Next Article in Journal
State-Dependent Model Based on Singular Spectrum Analysis Vector for Modeling Structural Breaks: Forecasting Indonesian Export
Next Article in Special Issue
An In-Depth Look at Rising Temperatures: Forecasting with Advanced Time Series Models in Major US Regions
Previous Article in Journal
Forecasting the Occurrence of Electricity Price Spikes: A Statistical-Economic Investigation Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Bootstrapping Long-Run Covariance of Stationary Functional Time Series

Department of Actuarial Studies and Business Analytics, Level 7, 4 Eastern Rd, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia
Forecasting 2024, 6(1), 138-151; https://doi.org/10.3390/forecast6010008
Submission received: 4 January 2024 / Revised: 30 January 2024 / Accepted: 2 February 2024 / Published: 5 February 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Application of Functional Data Analysis in Forecasting)

Abstract

A key summary statistic in a stationary functional time series is the long-run covariance function that measures serial dependence. It can be consistently estimated via a kernel sandwich estimator, which is the core of dynamic functional principal component regression for forecasting functional time series. To measure the uncertainty of the long-run covariance estimation, we consider sieve and functional autoregressive (FAR) bootstrap methods to generate pseudo-functional time series and study variability associated with the long-run covariance. The sieve bootstrap method is nonparametric (i.e., model-free), while the FAR bootstrap method is semi-parametric. The sieve bootstrap method relies on functional principal component analysis to decompose a functional time series into a set of estimated functional principal components and their associated scores. The scores can be bootstrapped via a vector autoregressive representation. The bootstrapped functional time series are obtained by multiplying the bootstrapped scores by the estimated functional principal components. The FAR bootstrap method relies on the FAR of order 1 to model the conditional mean of a functional time series, while residual functions can be bootstrapped via independent and identically distributed resampling. Through a series of Monte Carlo simulations, we evaluate and compare the finite-sample accuracy between the sieve and FAR bootstrap methods for quantifying the estimation uncertainty of the long-run covariance of a stationary functional time series.
Keywords: sieve bootstrap; dynamic functional principal component analysis; functional autoregressive of order 1; vector autoregressive representation; long-run covariance; plug-in bandwidth sieve bootstrap; dynamic functional principal component analysis; functional autoregressive of order 1; vector autoregressive representation; long-run covariance; plug-in bandwidth

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Shang, H.L. Bootstrapping Long-Run Covariance of Stationary Functional Time Series. Forecasting 2024, 6, 138-151. https://doi.org/10.3390/forecast6010008

AMA Style

Shang HL. Bootstrapping Long-Run Covariance of Stationary Functional Time Series. Forecasting. 2024; 6(1):138-151. https://doi.org/10.3390/forecast6010008

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shang, Han Lin. 2024. "Bootstrapping Long-Run Covariance of Stationary Functional Time Series" Forecasting 6, no. 1: 138-151. https://doi.org/10.3390/forecast6010008

APA Style

Shang, H. L. (2024). Bootstrapping Long-Run Covariance of Stationary Functional Time Series. Forecasting, 6(1), 138-151. https://doi.org/10.3390/forecast6010008

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop