Next Article in Journal
Conservation and In Situ Enhancement of Earthen Architecture in Archaeological Sites: Social and Anthropic Risks in the Case Studies of the Iberian Peninsula
Next Article in Special Issue
Recent Applications of Unilateral NMR to Objects of Cultural Heritage
Previous Article in Journal
Tourism Development through the Sense of UNESCO World Heritage: The Case of Hegra, Saudi Arabia
Previous Article in Special Issue
New Frontiers in the Digital Restoration of Hidden Texts in Manuscripts: A Review of the Technical Approaches
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

An Archaeometric Study of Lead-Glazed Medieval Ceramics (13th–14th Century) from Santarém, Portugal

by
L. F. Vieira Ferreira
1,2,*,
T. M. Casimiro
3,
C. Boavida
4,
M. F. Costa Pereira
5 and
I. Ferreira Machado
1,6
1
iBB—Institute for Bioengineering and Biosciences, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, 1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal
2
Portugal and Associate Laboratory i4HB—Institute for Health and Bioeconomy at Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, 1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal
3
História Territórios Comunidades, Centro de Ecologia Funcional, NOVA University of Lisbon, 1069-061 Caparica, Portugal
4
Instituto de Arqueologia e Paleociências, NOVA University of Lisbon, 1069-061 Caparica, Portugal
5
CERENA—Centro de Estudos em Recursos Naturais e Ambiente, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, 1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal
6
Polytechnic Institute of Portalegre, 7300-110 Portalegre, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Heritage 2024, 7(5), 2217-2238; https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage7050105
Submission received: 26 March 2024 / Revised: 17 April 2024 / Accepted: 22 April 2024 / Published: 25 April 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Non-invasive Technologies Applied in Cultural Heritage)

Abstract

:
Ceramic sherds from approximately 20 samples of lead-glazed tableware, recovered from diverse archaeological sites, including three repurposed storage pits transformed into dumpsters within the medieval city of Santarém (13th–14th century), underwent a meticulous examination. This investigation utilised techniques such as micro-Raman, ground-state diffuse reflectance absorption, and X-ray fluorescence spectroscopies, in addition to X-ray diffraction and stereomicroscopy. A parallel study was conducted on contemporaneous European ceramics (glazed sherds) sourced from archaeological sites dating back to the 13th–15th centuries in Saintonge (France), Ardenne, Zomergem, and Bruges (Belgium), as well as Surrey–Hampshire, Kingston, and Cheam (England). The first premise for comparing the Santarem samples with European production locations was their frequent commercial relations with Portugal and the frequency of these productions being found in Portugal. The colour of the ceramic bodies is predominantly white or whitish, with a few exhibiting a vivid red hue. Analyses of the fabric, mineralogical, and elemental composition of the sherds suggest that the majority of Santarém’s glazed ceramics were locally or regionally produced, potentially derived from a Pliocene kaolin-rich sand formation. However, this conclusion is not supported by the absence of discovered lead glaze kilns or workshops in Santarém for the late Middle Ages.

1. Introduction

Santarém was one of the most important cities in late Medieval Portugal. This importance needs to be observed from many different perspectives. One of the most important was related to its cereal production capacity, which granted this urban centre the nickname of “Portugal’s barn”. Santarém could produce large quantities of cereal and its location less than 100 km from Lisbon and close to the Tagus River made it fundamental in the wider Portuguese urban strategy [1,2]. The centralisation of cereal in communal barns only started to happen in the late 16th century [3]. Until then, cereals were kept underground in pits excavated into the bed rock. These can be found in many shapes but the most common were excavated shaped like a bag [4], and some of them date back to the Muslim occupation of the city (8th–12th centuries). Archaeological information obtained from many parts of the country reveals that these were located inside houses as much as on open fields. When these underground structures were out of use, independently of the reason behind this, they were filled with garbage either obtained from demolitions or just domestic refuse. Their abandonment occurred for many reasons but when some areas of the city were refurbished (construction of new roads or buildings), large areas of these storage pits were filled with domestic garbage. Although ceramics are the most abundant, all types of domestic refuse are frequently found inside.
The ceramics studied in this paper were found in some of these storage pits during an archaeological intervention carried out in Santarém in 2014, and they distinguish themselves from most other pottery objects due to their surfaces covered in glaze. These are what we can consider tableware. Their shapes correspond essentially to pitchers used to serve wine and can be dated (through information retrieved from archaeological stratigraphy and style) to the 13th and 14th centuries.
Although lead-glazed ceramics were common during the Muslim occupation and used in the majority of Santarém households [5,6,7] and other places where Muslim communities were, these tended to disappear from the set of household ceramics in the following centuries. In 1147, the city of Santarém was conquered by Christian forces, together with many other towns in the Tagus Valley. Although political and military elites disappeared, the local population continued to live there, including potters. This continuity can be seen in their production with the continuation of the use of similar shapes and decorations. Local production of redwares is confirmed by the existence of kilns dated to the 12th and 13th centuries [8,9,10]. However, this did not occur with glazed wares, which seemed to disappear completely in the second half of the 12th century and the first half of the 13th century. Nevertheless, these started to reappear in the archaeological context in the second half of the 13th century, although in small amounts.
The lack of published evidence of any kiln producing lead-glazed wares in the Tagus region in the 13th and 14th centuries made us believe initially that all these vessels were imported from Northern Europe, an area with whom the Portuguese kingdom had commercial relations [11]. These glazed vessels have been identified in many parts of the country but are seldom published [12,13,14] and demonstrate a relationship between Portugal and the Northern European markets.
Building upon the premise that these objects are imported, this paper will initially analyse a collection of such vessels unearthed in Santarém and juxtapose them with lead-glazed ceramics confidently crafted in Northern European workshops.
A detailed comparison of both ceramic bodies and glazes originating from Santarém and from the different coeval kilns in different European countries (countries with which Portugal had frequent commercial relations) aims to clarify the local or imported origin of all the earthenware samples under study. Upon noting substantial compositional disparities between the two sets of sherds under scrutiny, the proposal is to ascertain a plausible local or regional geological source for the clay deposits that provided the raw materials.

2. Geological Framework

The Santarém region is situated in Cenozoic formations, with ages ranging from ancient Miocene to modern Quaternary. Geomorphologically, the region is characterised by two Miocene–Pliocene plateaus with horizontally stratified layers and extensive lateral extent. These plateaus confine the Tagus River and its respective floodplains and river terraces. Detrital rocks, ranging from clayey sediments to large rounded pebbles, prevail, but locally, there are lithotypes of carbonate composition or transitional nature. Various geological resources exist in the region, particularly some clayey or sandy formations with suitability for the ceramic industry, continuing in use until recent times [15,16].
Kaolinite-bearing formations are less common but can be found in the Pliocene complex at various points along the Lisbon to Santarém railway line. Primarily used for ceramics (whitish bodies), they have led to exploitation at the site called Fonte da Pipa, west of the Vale de Santarém railway station. Clays used to produce tiles and bricks (red bodies) are also present at various points in the region.
The provenance of ceramic raw materials and the ceramic technology employed was studied in a recent publication [17], focused on the analysis of Islamic ceramics from the Alcáçova of Santarém. The authors collected samples from locations with historical records or of a more recent exploitation, as previously referenced for Miocene and Pliocene formations. In some cases, the authors conducted purification of the collected clays and sandy materials, providing detailed chemical and mineralogical characterisation to establish the local or external origin of those Islamic ceramics. The composition of those materials is mainly quartz, illite/muscovite, and minor feldspars (K feldspars and plagioclase). Calcite and chlorite can be also present in some layers. Based on various indicators, these authors concluded that both local production and imported objects existed in the Alcáçova of Santarém. Given the highly sandy-silt (siliceous) composition prevalence, they conclude that all raw materials were treated before use. This information is, therefore, highly relevant to the present study, which seeks to investigate whether there is temporal continuity in ceramic production, based on local mineral resources and marked stylistic similarities, or whether, conversely, medieval materials originate from European production centres.

3. The Ceramic Sample Set—Selection Methodology

3.1. Archaeological Context

In 2014/2013, a large archaeological campaign was carried out in Santarém, taking advantage of the replacement of water and electricity infrastructures. Being a historical city, it is legally mandatory that an archaeological survey is performed. During the work developed both in Travessa das Capuchas—Largo António Monteiro, 22 abandoned underground storage pits were found. In Largo Pedro Alvares Cabral, that number was 20. Not all of them were filled with domestic waste and that process occurred in the 13th and 14th centuries. In the Capuchas area, this certainly happened before 1415, when the Hospital dos Inocentes was built, and in Largo Pedro Alvares Cabral, this action was most likely related to the construction of Igreja da Graça that started to be built in the 1380s [18].
The commercial nature of the archaeological excavation did not allow excavation of these underground structures, except for three cases that were only partially excavated. They presented different dimensions from small, just over 1 m deep, to large, almost 3 m deep. Still, this allowed the recovery of hundreds of ceramic objects, most of them unglazed red earthenwares produced locally. In addition to the ceramic evidence, a large quantity of food remains were also recovered, demonstrating that these abandoned storage pits were used for domestic refusal deposits.
In considering the significance of these storage pits within the Medieval Santarém cultural frame, it becomes evident that they not only served utilitarian functions but also embodied symbolic meanings within the social manufacture of the city and the social construction of space. Their presence in urban spaces reveals aspects of the organisation of domestic life, the management of resources, and the interconnectedness of economic, social, and cultural spaces. These archaeological findings within the pits can thus be contextualised and inserted into broader historical narratives, gaining a richer understanding of medieval Santarém and its inhabitants’ daily experiences and practices. As one of the most productive areas of the kingdom of Portugal, Santarém had many wealthy inhabitants. Historical documents attest to that social reality [2] and when looking at the pottery used in tables, when compared to the other Portuguese cities mentioned below, the consumption of pottery reveals the same reality.

3.2. Samples

Figure 1 presents 20 sherds recovered from two underground cereal storage pits transformed into dumpsters excavated in Santarém and dated to the late medieval period (13th–14th-century archaeological context). Only glazed ceramics were selected for the archaeometric analyses presented in this paper.
As Figure 1 shows, green glazes are predominant, but some sherds exhibit amber or light brown glazes. In some cases, all sherd surfaces are glazed, but there is no pigment in some areas, and the glaze simply covers the ceramic body. As it is possible to observe through the sherd’s images, the samples can be considered quite heterogenous. Samples S1 and S2 are particularly interesting since they belonged to jugs decorated with green grapes in the S1 sample and black ‘grapes’ in the case of S2. S1 exhibits a red ceramic body, while all the other Santarém samples exhibit a whitish paste. All sherds are small, not exceeding about 10 cm in the longest dimension. The exception is sherd S1, which is about 15 cm high and 10 cm long.
Previous compositional studies of pottery ceramic pastes and clay raw materials from the region of Lisbon enabled us to establish a limited number of clay sources and formulations being used in the Lisbon workshops, where most of the ceramic production in the country was located [19,20,21,22]. Pliocene ceramic pastes (highly siliceous) or Miocene ceramic pastes (with a high content of calcium carbonate) were detected [23]. Potters settled preferentially in vicinity areas with clayey soils. We have to say, however, that there is no evidence of kilns producing lead-glazed pottery in the 13th and 14th centuries in the Tagus Valley (where Santarém is located). The production of glazed ceramics existed in the Muslim period until the 12th century and it was again proven from the 15th century onwards [24].
One should emphasise that in the Lisbon region, Miocene clays can be found in the North and South of the Tagus River, while Pliocene clays only exist on the South bank [16,21,22,23]. In the region of Santarém, Pliocene formations exhibit a more diversified composition, including predominantly illitic clayey facies, occasionally with calcretes (calcite-bearing formations) [17]. The only kaoliniferous formation referenced is the P1 level of kaolin sands [16].
In order to clarify this issue, many glazed (and some nonglazed) sherds from coeval European workshops were studied, and 20 samples are presented in Figure 2.
The suspicion that Santarém ceramics originated from different parts of Northern Europe is related to several factors: (a) 13th- and 14th-century ceramic productions are not that well known in Portugal, and lead-glazed wares are proportionally rare in medieval collections; (b) the majority of these ceramics correspond to shapes and glazes which are very similar to Northern European productions; (c) Northern European glazed ceramics have been found in other archaeological contexts in Portugal and medieval lead-glazed ceramic production has never been confirmed—Figure 3. When observing some of the lead-glazed ceramics found in Portugal, these objects are very similar to Saintonge, Bruges, and English productions. It is known that ceramics previously identified as Northern European ceramics in 15th-century contexts were after all produced in Portugal [25]. The Santarém contexts are earlier and, thus far, no kiln before the 15th century is known to have produced any type of glazed ceramics.
The sherds analysed as comparative productions in this paper were obtained from different excavations in different parts of Northern Europe in sites possible to date to the 13th to the 15th century. The Saintonge, Surrey–Hampshire, Kingston, and Cheam types were all found in unstratified contexts in the greater London area and were classified by pottery specialists. As for the remaining types, these were obtained in the Ardenne, Zomergem, and Bruges areas. They were found associated with kilns and pottery wasters, and are thus considered local productions [26,27]. The choice of these areas as comparative productions was based on two basic premises. First, this area had frequent commercial relations with Portugal in the 13th and 14th centuries [11], and second, ceramics produced in this area are frequent finds in Portugal [12,13].
The Saintonge productions tend to present a light buff fabric glazed either green or dark yellow and are among the most widely distributed medieval glazed ceramics in Northern Europe [28]. The red fabric objects are usually glazed in green and are believed to be produced in the Bruges area (or the Netherlands) [29,30]. Finally, there are some objects that, by their characteristics, seem to have been produced in Britain [31].
Our archaeometric study of the glazed pottery found in the archaeological sites of medieval Santarém dated to the 13th to 14th centuries are, in this context, the first ones for such medieval glazed ceramics, and it is particularly interesting to determine whether they were locally produced or imported pottery.

4. Experimental Techniques under Use

Micro-Raman and ground-state diffuse reflectance absorption spectra spectroscopy (GSDR), stereomicroscopy (SM), and X-ray fluorescence (XRF) are non-invasive spectroscopies for glazes, while X-ray diffraction (XRD) analyses of the ceramic bodies involve the removal of ca. 10 to 15 mg of powder from each sherd. The use of powdered samples was mandatory for the equipment under use (described in the experimental section). The same powder was used for the X-ray fluorescence (XRF) experiments, enabling us to obtain results from more homogenous samples. This amount of 10 to 15 mg of powder is negligible since all sherds’ weights vary between 5 and 75 g, and these two techniques can be considered as quasi-non-invasive methodologies for the study of ceramic bodies.
Micro-Raman investigations were carried out employing Renishaw InVia Confocal Raman equipment (manufacturer: Renishaw, London, UK), in a back-scattering configuration, using a 532 nm laser excitation.
GSDR experiments were conducted employing a home-built diffuse reflectance set-up, using an ICCD as a detector and a W-Hal lamp as the excitation source. Three standards, Spectralon white and grey disks and barium sulphate powder, were used to obtain the reflectance curves, and from them, the remission function was calculated.
For elemental composition information, XRF analyses were performed using a Niton XL3T GOLDD spectrometer from Thermo Scientific (manufacturer: ThermoFisher Scientific, London, UK).
To study the mineralogical and phase composition of the ceramic bodies of the sherds, XRD analyses were conducted utilising a Panalytical X’ PERT PRO (Malvern Panalytical Ltd., Malvern, UK) diffractometer system equipped with a copper source.
The analysis conditions for the four methodologies under use were the same as in the references provided. Diffractograms were performed only one time for most samples as they were quite similar, as discussed in the text. However, in the cases where some differences were noted, they were repeated once or twice. All the other experiments were repeated at least three times.
In the stereomicroscopy (SM) experiments, tile sections’ were observed using a Nikon SMZ645 stereomicroscope and representative images were acquired using a Moticam 10.0 MP digital camera.
XRF spectroscopy provides the elemental compositions of both ceramic bodies and glazes, diffractograms provide the mineralogical composition of pastes, and GSDR absorption spectra provide the colour characterisation. Finally, stereomicroscopy allowed us to perform a detailed comparison of cross-sections, which distinctly revealed that the fabric of light-coloured pastes in Santarém was quite distinct from the foreign fabrics.
Further details regarding all these techniques were previously described in [20,21,22].

5. Results and Discussion

5.1. Micro-Raman Studies

Micro-Raman spectroscopy is an excellent technique to identify the pigments used to decorate the surface of the glazed ceramic and to characterise the glaze itself [32]. All the white paste ceramics were made with highly siliceous clays; therefore, quartz was detected in many samples. In the white pastes, most samples exhibited anatase (TiO2) and carbon black on the darker surfaces. As expected, the red pastes were rich in hematite, as will be further demonstrated.
As previously referred to, sherd S1 has dimensions of about 15 cm × 10 cm and belonged to a wine jar, common in medieval pottery. Both the body of the jar and the grapes are covered with a green glaze, and it is interesting to point out that no specific copper signature (Cu2+) was detected in the Raman spectrum of S1. The green colour of the lead-based glaze was certainly obtained with the use of copper oxide, as XRF data presented later in this paper for glazes will show. However, no Raman signature was detected because Cu2+ was dissolved in the matrix, as pointed out in previous publications [33,34].
Sherd S2 was probably also from a wine jug, in this case decorated with black grapes. Large amounts of hematite (Fe2O3) and magnetite (Fe3O4) were detected in that black decoration, as the micro-Raman spectra of Figure 4a show. The presence of a red paste beneath the substrate, covering the white paste, justifies the obtained results (see also Figure S1).
In samples S2 and S4 from Santarém, a clear signature of anatase was detected, showing that this mineral is dispersed in the glaze layer that covers the surface of the pottery. Anatase and quartz were also detected in most Santarém Raman spectra of the ceramic bodies, as Figure 4b shows.
One should also mention that, in all samples, there was a remarkable absence of calcium carbonate, as shown in Figure 4 and Figure 5. The only exception was Santarém S6 white paste, although the amount of CaCO3 (peaking at 1087 cm−1) was certainly very low. The residual presence of calcite can be attributed to secondary calcite formed during burial, through impregnation or alteration of primary ceramic components, with the latter hypothesis being less likely, as will be shown subsequently using other methodologies.
Micro-Raman spectroscopy was also used to obtain information about the nature of the glaze, even establishing correlations with the firing temperature of the kiln. Quartz is a crystalline form of SiO2 and, in glassy structures, part of the covalent bonds between the SiO4 tetrahedra is destroyed. The ratio of the stretching (i.e., ~1000 cm−1) and bending (~500 cm−1) Raman envelopes can be correlated to the temperature of the kiln, the glaze composition, and the different fluxing agents. Colomban introduced a quantification using a ratio of band areas Ip = A500/A1000, where Ip is the polymerisation index [32]. Santarém glass types are lead-rich glazes with Ip ~0.1 to 0.2, pointing to kiln firing temperatures below 700 °C.
The maximum wavenumber of the Si-O stretching bands (υmax) for the Santarém glazes lies in the 935 to 960 cm−1 range, a value typical of lead-rich glazes [32].
Figure 4b shows the Raman spectra found for most ceramic bodies for the Santarém sherds. Large amounts of anatase, quartz, and carbon black were detected.
A similar study was performed for the sherds of the European coeval production centres, and some significant cases are shown in Figure 5.
A striking similarity is observed in the micro-Raman spectra of the glazes depicted in Figure 4a and Figure 5. Additionally, the Ip parameter exhibits slight variations, ranging from approximately 0.1 to 0.2. Consequently, discerning distinctive features indicative of different production centres proves challenging through this spectroscopic technique alone. No Raman spectra are presented for the ceramic bodies of the European sherds because the results are basically the same as those presented in Figure 4b. To ascertain the origins of Santarém pottery conclusively, we will proceed by presenting results derived from alternative spectroscopic and visual methods or techniques.

5.2. GSDR Studies

Ground-state diffuse reflectance absorption spectra for all coloured sherds in Figure 1 and Figure 2 are presented in Figure 6 and Figure 7, where the remission function is the ordinate and the wavelength in nm is the abscissa. Figure 6a shows the absorption spectra of sample S2, the one with black grapes. The green glaze presents two maxima, one at about 380 nm and the other in the visible region, maximising at ca. 700 nm. The absorption in the red region produces the observed green colour (the complementary colour of the red). The black grapes are characterised by a high value of the remission function both in the UV and visible regions of the spectrum. By contrast, the ceramic body absorbs primarily in the UV region.
Figure 6b refers to the amber colour of sample S3. An absorption band maximising at about 470 nm is compatible with a higher concentration of iron oxide, as described in [33,34].
The GSDR absorption spectra of Figure 7 are like the ones presented in Figure 6, regarding the green and greenish glazes. The brown glaze of sherd Z1 is characterised by a broad absorption band, spreading from the UV to all visible regions and maximising at about 420 nm. The K2 sherd exhibits yellow and green spots, and the absorption bands reflect blue and red absorptions. Finally, the yellow glaze of sample St3 exhibits an absorption, in the blue region, at about 380 nm, while the creamy glaze of the A2 sample absorbs in the UV region and has a small broad band in the visible region.
Again, the similarity of the GSDR absorption spectra for the glazes presented for the Santarém and European sherds is remarkable, and no clear differences in the production centres can be established using this spectroscopic technique.

5.3. XRD Studies

The ceramic bodies retrieved from both the Santarém pits and European archaeological sites underwent comprehensive analysis using X-ray diffraction (XRD powder method). As illustrated in Figure 8 (limited to whitish pastes), the striking resemblance between the two groups outweighs any noticeable distinctions. All pastes were crafted from siliceous raw materials, resulting in pronounced quartz (Q) signatures. Alongside amorphous/nanocrystalline phases, which XRD cannot fully characterise, a select number of minor minerals were identified, including muscovite, rutile, anatase, microcline, and plagioclase. Hematite was found only in the red pastes. Furthermore, the presence of muscovite or illite/muscovite thermal-derived phases was observed (see Table 1). This temperature-dependent phenomenon, primarily governed by dihydroxylation, is discernible in XRD pattern modifications, particularly evident in characteristic reflections at 2θ = 8.9 and 2θ = 19.8. These modifications facilitate the assessment of minimum kiln temperatures [22].

5.4. XRF Studies

5.4.1. Ceramic Bodies

The XRF results achieved for the ceramic bodies of sherds from the Santarém archaeological site are presented in Table 2, and Table 3 presents similar data for the European sherds.
The data included in Table 2 and Table 3 allow for establishing various types of ratios, commonly used for comparative analyses between materials. After an exploratory analysis of these data, it is found that one of the main ratios with discriminatory capacity among the samples under study is based on the concentration of the two main oxides, SiO2 and Al2O3, with which K2O, CaO, and Fe2O3 can be associated. The observed differences/trends will be directly correlated with the original formulation of the paste, where, alongside the clay components and quartz, the aforementioned accessory minerals occur. Thus, Figure 9 was selected, elaborated on with the ratios of Al/Si vs. Ca/Si, to chemically describe all the samples under study.
The scatterplot for Al/Si versus Ca/Si (% wt ratio) for all sherds (Figure 9) reveals two distinct clusters, with the upper one corresponding to Santarém samples and the lower one to the European group. There are a few samples that slightly deviate from this general clustering. The Santarém sample S1 (red paste), is positioned in the group of the blue ellipse, the European one. Saintonge St1 and Ardenne A1 and A2 are included in the Santarém green ellipse. Santarém samples exhibit a distinctly higher aluminium content, while the majority of European ceramic bodies are more quartz-rich. The Ca/Si ratio shows little variability as, in general, CaO contents are very low, and according to the XRD-identified mineralogy, they can be correlated with the presence of Na-Ca plagioclase.
This finding represents the initial spectroscopic evidence definitively delineating between Santarém and European samples. All preceding findings from Figure 9 gathered with the data of Table 2 and Table 3 reinforce the non-calcareous nature of the ceramic bodies, with calcium contents less than 5% wt CaO [36,37], aligning with the Pliocene-like origin of the clays used from the Lisbon region [19].
Table 2 and Table 3 present R values. R is defined by R = (SiO2 + Al2O3 + K2O)/CaO and was used in previous papers by our group [19,20,21,22] to quantify the relative amounts of the structural components of the ceramic pastes (SiO2 + Al2O3 + K2O), related to calcium fractions (CaO). As one could expect, all R values are characteristic of the Pliocene-like clays [19], and no significant difference exists between Santarém and the European cases.
Figure 10 depicts samples S1 (red paste) from Santarém and Belgium (B1, B2, and B3 from Bruges—red pastes and Z1 and Z2 from Zomergem—grey–brown pastes). These pastes are represented in the lower section of Figure 10, exhibiting notably low Al/Si and Ca/Si ratios. All of them demonstrate a higher iron content (7–9% wt.). This aspect clearly indicates that Belgian pastes have a markedly distinct formulation from the other light-coloured pastes from Santarém. The similarity in chemical composition between sample S1 and the other coloured paste samples suggests a common origin. This aspect will be further evaluated by also considering the data from the ceramic’s fabric.

5.4.2. Glazes

XRF results for glazes are presented in Table 4 and Table 5. As mentioned before, all glazed sherds possess transparent lead glazes [38], and, for most samples, the PbO content of the Santarém samples (~50% wt.) is higher than the European ones (~40% wt.). The PbO/SiO2 ratio is also different for the two groups, pointing to different technologies in the glaze-manufacturing process.
Figure 11 shows the correlation between the flux, PbO, and the SiO2 content, suggesting a linear relation between them. Indeed, the flux content is higher in the Santarém samples (the green triangles).
Some authors [39,40,41] referred to the use of Sb-based opacifiers in the studied glazes (from Korchabad, Susa, Persepolis, and Tepe Rabat—8th and 6th centuries BC), present as lead antimonate, calcium antimonate, and/or sodium antimonate. In some cases [39], even no Pb was detected. This was not our case, because no Sb was detected in the samples studied by us.
The colouring agent of green-coloured sherds was copper, as is common in ancient coloured glazed ceramics [39,42,43], while brown and amber colours were obtained with the use of iron oxide. The black grape of sample S2, apart from the iron compounds revealed by the micro-Ramam spectrum, also presents the addition of copper, perhaps used to reinforce the darkness [40].

5.5. Optical Microscopy (OM)

Given the limited variability in X-ray diffraction (XRD) analyses of light-coloured ceramic pastes, suggesting similarities in the components of raw materials and firing conditions, a clear trend emerges regarding the proportion of these components. This trend becomes more evident when considering major oxides (SiO2 and Al2O3) as stated before. Despite previous evidence revealing a strong possibility of different origins for the light clay samples from Santarém compared to European ones, a visual inspection of their manufacturing was carried out, using various parameters, to validate this assumption. Particular attention was given to European samples whose composition fell within the domain of the Santarém group or vice versa, as well as to the group of coloured ceramics, namely those made of red clay.
Figures S1 and S2 (Supplementary Material) present cross-sections of Santarém samples S1 to S20 and all European samples. Tables S1 and S2 summarise the fabric paste characteristics of all samples used in this study.
The combination of chemical data (Table 2 and Table 3) with the fabric analysis of the light sherds, including sample Z1, observed through stereomicroscopy, is represented in Figure 12. Alongside the Al/Si and Ca/Si values that determined the positioning of the samples in the figure, two parallel vertical axes were placed, aiming to establish a correspondence between the ceramic and the raw material that it originated from (clay–quartz mixture) for a given value of Al/Si. Given the aluminous and siliceous composition of the pastes, with a low content of K2O, hypotheses of kaolinite–quartz and illite–quartz mixtures are considered based on their ideal chemical compositions. On the horizontal axis, we placed the slight trend of enrichment in CaO instead of the Ca/Si parameter, which, according to observations, is due to the presence of relic feldspar (Na-Ca plagioclase) in the ceramic paste (e.g., sample S16).
From top to bottom, the samples exhibit a decreasing Al2O3/SiO2 ratio (indicating that they are more quartzose or siliceous), and from left to right, they show a slight enrichment in feldspar, possibly albite/oligoclase.
Visual analysis distinctly reveals that the manufacture of light-coloured pastes in Santarém is distinct from other foreign manufactures. Foreign light-coloured paste fabrics are also distinct from each other. Only the samples from SH exhibit two distinct manufactures (SH1, SH3, SH4 vs. SH2), revealing that they may have a different origin or formulation. The remaining samples show a notable origin homogeneity in both chemical composition and fabric.
In the formulation of pastes found in Santarém, it is evident that there is control over the quantity of quartz in the paste formulation. The fabric is globally dominated by an abundant plastic fraction, where the quartz temper is unimodal, tending to be fine, with occasional coarse grains. Some small compositional differences are observed in the content of muscovite and feldspar, still recognisable in XRD patterns and visual inspection. The overall composition suggests that the paste results from a source rich in kaolinite, where quartz is consistently present. Considering only quartz and kaolinite as paste constituents, the quartz content of Santarém light pastes varies between 15 and 30%, which is in good agreement with the visual analysis. The light colour of the pastes and the actual content of quartz exclude the hypothesis of an illite-bearing source, as can be seen in Figure 12.
The gathered information suggests that the origin of the ceramics found in Santarém are not of European import, as initially thought due to stylistic similarities. On the other hand, there are geological formations in the local area capable of providing ceramic raw materials, particularly a Pliocene or Pliocene-like formation rich in kaolinite (Pliocene sands P1 with approximately 30% kaolinite) [16,17].
Upon initial visual observation, the entirely red ceramics appear similar due to the abundance of quartz and similarity in manufacturing. However, there is a noticeable trend towards a greater predominance of fine and rounded quartz in the Bruges samples. Another evident aspect, observed in the two selected pastes with red and white components, is that, in the case of Santarém (S2), there is a very plastic and compact white paste, almost devoid of quartz, onto which another very plastic red paste was added, the grape decoration. On the other hand, in Bruges, there is a coarser red paste in the interior and a more plastic and visibly porous white decorative layer—Figure 13.
Based on the comprehensive data collected, we can confidently assert that most identified Santarém ceramic fragments are likely of local origin. The production of light-coloured ceramics seems to have involved the utilisation of clay from Fonte da Pipa, specifically from the Pliocene formation P1 [16], known for its kaolin-bearing sands. In the refinement process, the explored material underwent purification, with meticulous control over the temper proportion tailored to meet the specific requirements dictated by the intended function of each object. In contrast, the origins of the red ceramics appear more diverse, reflecting the multiple possibilities suggested by historical records. In this case, a more illite-bearing local clay is expected [17].

6. Conclusions

A multiple analytical approach using micro-Raman, ground-state diffuse reflectance absorption, and X-ray fluorescence spectroscopies, as well as the X-ray diffraction technique and stereomicroscopy, allowed us to establish the mineralogical and elemental composition of the Santarém and European coeval sherds. Most techniques did not allow us to determine a distinction between the two groups.
However, biplots of XRF data, both for ceramic bodies and glazes, seem to indicate that the majority of the Santarém ceramics were most probably produced locally. This assumption is validated by the visual analysis of the paste’s fabric. Considering the results obtained, it seems possible to infer that the raw material could have been obtained from local or regional clay sources, particularly from the purification of kaolinitic siliceous sands of the Pliocene type.
Late medieval imported ceramics from Northern Europe have already been identified in Porto and Lisbon. However, these were two of the most prominent cities in the kingdom of Portugal whose economy was largely based on their Atlantic ports. Santarém had no direct access to the sea and all trade was made by river navigation. This may have motivated the production of objects resembling Northern European ceramics. The hypothesis that some of these objects were produced locally opens very interesting paths of discussion in terms of cultural influence. As aforementioned, several studies demonstrate that Muslim potters did not abandon the city and redwares continued to be made following the 8th–12th-century tradition. However, the same did not happen with lead-glazed wares. If made in Santarém, these were made following the patterns and styles of Northern European productions, revealing a confluence of influences and styles that permits us to conclude that, while daily used objects such as pots and pans were produced according to old traditions, glazed tableware production followed the most recent imported style.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/heritage7050105/s1, Figure S1: Cross-sections of Santarém samples S1 to S20; Figure S2: Cross-sections of European sherds; Table S1: Santarém Stereomicroscope fabric sherd character; Table S2: European Stereomicroscope fabric sherd characterization.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.F.V.F., I.F.M., T.M.C., M.F.C.P. and C.B.; investigation, L.F.V.F., I.F.M. and M.F.C.P.; writing—original draft preparation, L.F.V.F., I.F.M., T.M.C. and M.F.C.P.; writing—review and editing, L.F.V.F., I.F.M., T.M.C. and M.F.C.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT). Projects UID/NAN/50024/2019, UIDB/04028/2020, M-ERA-MNT/0002/2015.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Materials, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s.

Acknowledgments

Thanks are due to Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT, Portugal, for the funding. The authors would like to thank Chris Jarret and Maxime Poulain for the non-Portuguese samples used in this paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Viana, M. Alguns Preços de Cereais em Portugal (séculos XIII-XVI). Arquipél. Hist. 2008, 12, 207–279. [Google Scholar]
  2. Beirante, M. Santarém Quinhentista; Fundo de Fomento Cultural: Lisboa, Portugal, 1981.
  3. Barata, F. Negócios e crédito: Complexidade e flexibilidade das práticas creditícias (século XV). Anál. Soc. 1996, XXI, 683–709. [Google Scholar]
  4. Rosa, S. Os silos Medievais de Almada. Morfologia e Dinâmicas de Utilização. Master’s Dissertation, NOVA University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal, 2019, unpublished. [Google Scholar]
  5. Viegas, C.; Arruda, A. Cerâmicas islâmicas da Alcáçova de Santarém. Rev. Port. Arqueol. 1999, 2, 105–186. [Google Scholar]
  6. Silva, M. A Cerâmica Islâmica da Alcáçova de Santarém, das Unidades Estratigráficas 17, 18, 27, 28, 30, 37, 39, 41, 193, 195, 196, 197 e 210. Master’s Dissertation, Faculdade de Letras da Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal, 2011, unpublished. [Google Scholar]
  7. Casimiro, T.M.; Ferreira, A.F.; Silva, T. Alfange: Núcleo habitacional nos arrabaldes de Santarém em época islâmica. Arqueol. História 2017, 66–67, 85–96. [Google Scholar]
  8. Liberato, M. A Cerâmica Pintada a Branco na Santarém Medieval: Uma Abordagem Diacrónica Séculos XI a XVI. Master’s Dissertation, Faculdade de Letras da Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal, 2011, unpublished. [Google Scholar]
  9. Liberato, M. A pintura a banco na Santarém Medieval. Séculos XI a XVI. In Actas do X Congresso Internacional de Cerâmica no Mediterrâneo Ocidental; Campo Arqueológico de Mértola: Mértola, Portugal, 2015; pp. 777–791. [Google Scholar]
  10. Casimiro, T.M.; Boavida, C.; Silva, T.; Neves, D. Ceramics and cultural change in medieval (14th–15th century) Portugal. The case of post-Reconquista Santarém, 14724. Mediev. Ceram. 2018, 3, 21–35. [Google Scholar]
  11. Marques, A.O. Hansa e Portugal na Idade Média; Editorial Presença: Lisboa, Portugal, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  12. Gomes, P.D.; Melo, M.R.; Osório, M.I.P.; Silva, A.M.; Teixeira, R.J. Cerâmicas tardo-medievais e modernas de importação na cidade do Porto: Primeira notícia. Olaria Estud. Arqueol. Históricos E Etnológicos 2004, 3, 89–96. [Google Scholar]
  13. Oliveira, F.; SIlva, R.; Bargão, A.; Ferreira, S. O comércio medieval de cerâmicas importadas em lisboa: O caso da rua das pedras negras n.os 21-28. In Arqueologia em Portugal/2017—Estado da Questão; Associação dos Arqeólogos Portugueses: Lisboa, Portugal, 2017; pp. 1523–1538. [Google Scholar]
  14. Fernandes, L.; Marques, A.; Torres, A. Ocupação baixo-medieval do teatro romano de Lisboa: A propósito de uma estrutura hidráulica, as cerâmicas vidradas e esmaltadas. Arqueol. Mediev. 2008, 8, 159–183. [Google Scholar]
  15. Zbyszewsky, G. Carta Geológica de Portugal, na escale 1/50000, Notícia Explicativa no Mapa 31-a—Santarém; Direcção Geral das Minas e Serviços Geológicos, Serviço Geológico de Portugal: Lisboa, Portugal, 1953.
  16. Lepierre, C. Estudo Chimico e Technologico sobre a Cerâmica Portuguesa Moderna; Imprensa Nacional: Lisboa, Portugal, 1899.
  17. Beltrame, M.; Sitzig, F.; Arruda, A.M.; Barrudas, P.; Barata, F.T.; Mirão, J. The Islamic Ceramic of the Santarém Alcáçova: Raw materials, technology, and trade. Archaeometry 2021, 63, 1157–1177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Mendonça, I. Hospital dos Inocentes/Convento das Capuchas. 1996. Available online: http://www.monumentos.pt (accessed on 12 March 2024).
  19. Vieira Ferreira, L.F.; Ferreira Machado, I.; Pereira, M.F.C.; Mangucci, C. Archaeometry of tiles produced in the region of Lisbon—16th to 18th centuries. A comparison of Lisbon and Seville pastes for the cuerda seca and arista tiles. J. Archaeol. Sci. Rep. 2023, 49, 104041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Vieira Ferreira, L.F.; Barros, L.; Ferreira Machado, I.; Pereira, M.F.C.; Casimiro, T.M. An archaeometric study of a Late Neolithic cup and coeval and Chalcolithic ceramic sherds found in the São Paulo Cave, Almada, Portugal. J. Raman Spectrosc. 2020, 51, 483–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Vieira Ferreira, L.F.; Barros, L.; Machado, I.; Gonzalez, A.; Pereira, M.; Casimiro, T. Spectroscopic characterization of amphorae from the 8th to the 7th c. BCE found at the Almaraz settlement in Almada, Portugal. J. Archaeol. Sci. Rep. 2018, 21, 166–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Vieira Ferreira, L.F.; Gonzalez, A.; Pereira, M.F.C.; Santos, L.F.; Casimiro, T.M.; Ferreira, D.P.; Conceição, D.S.; Ferreira Machado, I. Spectroscopy of 16th century Portuguese tin-glazed earthenware produced in the region of Lisbon. Ceram Intern. 2015, 41, 13433–13446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zbyszewski, G. Carta Geológica dos Arredores de Lisboa na escala 1/50 000—Notícia Explicativa da folha 4—Lisboa; Serviço Geológico de Portugal: Lisboa, Portugal, 1963.
  24. Henriques, J.P.; Filipe, V.; Casimiro, T.M.; Krus, A. By fire and clay. A late 15th century pottery workshop in Lisbon. In Proceedings of the of the 12th International Congress on Medieval and Modern Pottery Ceramics, Athens, Greece, 21–27 October 2018; pp. 41–52. [Google Scholar]
  25. Vieira Ferreira, L.F.; Varela Gomes, M.; Pereira, M.F.C.; Santos, L.F.; Ferreira Machado, I. A multi-technique study for the spectroscopic characterization of the ceramics from Santa Maria do Castelo church (Torres Novas, Portugal). J. Archaeol. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 182–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. De Clercq, W.; De Groote, K.; Moens, J.; Mortier, S. Zomergem. Bauwerwaan: Sporen van 12de-Eeuwse Kleiwinning en Pottenbakkersactiviteit. Monumentenzorg en Cultuurpatrimonium; Jaarverslag van de Provincie Oost-Vlaanderen: Ghent, Belgium, 2000; pp. 192–195. [Google Scholar]
  27. Vandewalle, E. Pottenbakkersafval van de Potterierei-Schipperskapel te Brugge. Bijdrage tot het Stadsarcheologisch en Regionaal Aardewerkonderzoek. Master’s Thesis, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  28. Haggarty, G. A gazetteer and summary of French pottery imported into Scotland c. 1150 to c. 1650 a ceramic contribution to Scotland’s economic history Ceramic Resource Disc 3. Tayside Fife Archaeol. Soc. 2006, 12, 117–118. [Google Scholar]
  29. Janssen, H. Later medieval pottery production in the Netherlands. In Ceramics and Trade; Davey, P., Hodges, R., Eds.; Department of Prehistory and Archaeology of the University of Sheffield: Sheffield, UK, 1983; pp. 121–185. [Google Scholar]
  30. Verhaeghe, F. Medieval pottery production in coastal Flanders. In Ceramics and Trade; Davey, P., Hodges, R., Eds.; Department of Prehistory and Archaeology of the University of Sheffield: Sheffield, UK, 1983; pp. 63–94. [Google Scholar]
  31. Pearce, J. Post-Medieval Pottery in London, 1500–1700; Border Wares, Stationary Office: London, UK, 1992; Volume 1. [Google Scholar]
  32. Colomban, P.; Tournie, A.; Bellot-Gurlet, L. Raman identification of glassy silicats used in ceramics, glass and jewellery: A tentative differentiation guide. J. Raman Spectrosc. 2006, 37, 841–852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Prinsloo, L.C.; Colomban, P. A Raman spectroscopic study of the Mapungubwe oblates: Glass trade beads excavated at an Iron Age archaeological site in South Africa. J. Raman Spectrosc. 2008, 39, 79–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Moncke, D.; Papageorgiou, M.; Winterstein-Beckmann, A.; Zacharias, N. Roman glasses coloures by dissolved transition metal ions: Redox-reactionsw, optical spectroscopy and ligang field theory. J. Archaeol. Sci. 2014, 46, 23–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Simsek, G.; Casadio, F.; Colomban, P.; Bellot-Gurlet, L.; Faber, K.T.; Zelleke, G.; Milande, V.; Moinet, E. On-site identification of early Böttger red stoneware made at Meissen using portable XRF: 1, body analysis. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2014, 97, 2745–2754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Tite, M. Ceramic production, provenance and use—A review. Archaeometry 2008, 50, 216–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Walton, M.; Tite, M.S. Production Technology of Roman Lead-Glazed Pottery and its Continuance into Late Antiquity. Archaeometry 2010, 52, 733–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Tite, M.S.; Freestone, I.; Mason, R.; Molera, J.; Vendrell-Saz, M.; Wood, N. Lead Glazes in Antiquity—Methods of Production and Reasons for Use. Archaeometry 1998, 40, 241–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Holakooei, P.; Ahmadi, M.; Volpe, L.; Vaccaro, C. Early opacifiers in the glaze industry of first millennium BC Persia: Persepolis and Tepe Rabat. Archaeometry 2017, 59, 239–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Alloteau, F.; Majérus, O.; Gerony, F.; Bouquillon, A.; Doublet, C.; Gries, H.; Fügert, A.; Thomas, A.; Wallez, G. Microscopic-Scale Examination of the Black and Orange–Yellow Colours of Architectural Glazes from Aššur, Khorsabad and Babylon in Ancient Mesopotamia. Minerals 2022, 12, 311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Beauvoit, E.; Bouquillon, A.; Majérus, O.; Caurant, D.; Cuny, J.; Thomas, A. Comparative Study of Architectural Bricks from Khorsabad and Susa Sites: Characterization of Black Glazes. Heritage 2023, 6, 6291–6310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Benedetto, G.E.; Acquafreda, P.; Masieri, M.; Quarta, G.; Sabbatini, L.; Zambonin, P.G.; Tite, M.; Walton, M. Investigation on Roman Lead Glaze from Canosa: Results of Chemical Analyses. Archaeometry 2004, 46, 615–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Molera, J.; Ferreras, V.M.; Fusaro, A.; Esparraguera, J.M.G.; Gaudenzia, M.; Pidaev, S.R.; Pradell, T. Islamic glazed wares from ancient Termez (southern Uzbekistan). Raw materials and techniques. J. Archaeol. Sci. Rep. 2020, 29, 102169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Glazed ceramic sherds collected from two storage pits, dated to the 13th–14th centuries, Santarém. S stands for Santarém. Scale bar: 10 mm.
Figure 1. Glazed ceramic sherds collected from two storage pits, dated to the 13th–14th centuries, Santarém. S stands for Santarém. Scale bar: 10 mm.
Heritage 07 00105 g001
Figure 2. Glazed ceramic sherds collected from several European archaeological sites dated to the 13th–14th centuries. St—Saintonge; A—Ardenne; Z—Zomergem; B—Bruges; SH—Surrey–Hampshire; K—Kingston; and C—Cheam. Scale bar: 10 mm.
Figure 2. Glazed ceramic sherds collected from several European archaeological sites dated to the 13th–14th centuries. St—Saintonge; A—Ardenne; Z—Zomergem; B—Bruges; SH—Surrey–Hampshire; K—Kingston; and C—Cheam. Scale bar: 10 mm.
Heritage 07 00105 g002
Figure 3. Map with Santarém and European archaeological sites where all samples were collected.
Figure 3. Map with Santarém and European archaeological sites where all samples were collected.
Heritage 07 00105 g003
Figure 4. Micro-Raman spectra from the most significant glazed surfaces (a) and pastes (b) of the Santarém sherds. Quartz (Q), anatase (A), hematite (H), magnetite (M), carbon black (CB), stretching (υ) and bending (δ) of Raman envelopes.
Figure 4. Micro-Raman spectra from the most significant glazed surfaces (a) and pastes (b) of the Santarém sherds. Quartz (Q), anatase (A), hematite (H), magnetite (M), carbon black (CB), stretching (υ) and bending (δ) of Raman envelopes.
Heritage 07 00105 g004
Figure 5. Micro-Raman spectra from the most significant glazed surfaces from the European sherds. Quartz (Q), anatase (A), c arbon black (CB), stretching (υ) and bending (δ) of Raman envelopes.
Figure 5. Micro-Raman spectra from the most significant glazed surfaces from the European sherds. Quartz (Q), anatase (A), c arbon black (CB), stretching (υ) and bending (δ) of Raman envelopes.
Heritage 07 00105 g005
Figure 6. GSDR absorption spectra of S2 Santarém green and black glaze and ceramic body (a) and S3 Santarém amber glaze and ceramic body (b).
Figure 6. GSDR absorption spectra of S2 Santarém green and black glaze and ceramic body (a) and S3 Santarém amber glaze and ceramic body (b).
Heritage 07 00105 g006
Figure 7. GSDR absorption spectra of European sherds: (a) St1—Saintonge green glaze; St3—Saintonge yellow glaze; A2—Ardenne cream glaze; Z1—Zomergem brown glaze; (b) B1—Bruges green glaze; SH2—Surrey–Hampshire greenish glaze; K2—Kingston cream glaze; C1—Cheam brownish glaze.
Figure 7. GSDR absorption spectra of European sherds: (a) St1—Saintonge green glaze; St3—Saintonge yellow glaze; A2—Ardenne cream glaze; Z1—Zomergem brown glaze; (b) B1—Bruges green glaze; SH2—Surrey–Hampshire greenish glaze; K2—Kingston cream glaze; C1—Cheam brownish glaze.
Heritage 07 00105 g007
Figure 8. Representative XRD patterns for ceramic bodies of sherds from Santarém medieval archaeological site, all non-carbonaceous silicious-type pastes. XRD peaks: quartz (Q), anatase (A), rutile (R), muscovite (M), and microcline (Mic). (All diffractograms were normalised to the quartz peak at 2θ0 = 21.0 (constant intensity), to allow comparisons of the relative amounts of all the other minerals).
Figure 8. Representative XRD patterns for ceramic bodies of sherds from Santarém medieval archaeological site, all non-carbonaceous silicious-type pastes. XRD peaks: quartz (Q), anatase (A), rutile (R), muscovite (M), and microcline (Mic). (All diffractograms were normalised to the quartz peak at 2θ0 = 21.0 (constant intensity), to allow comparisons of the relative amounts of all the other minerals).
Heritage 07 00105 g008
Figure 9. Scatterplot of Al/Si versus Ca/Si count ratios for the studied ceramic. The contents of Al and Ca measured by XRF were normalised to the Si content [35]. Green ellipse—light coloured pastes with lower quartz temper. Blue ellipse—light, reddish, and grey brownish pastes with higher quartz temper.
Figure 9. Scatterplot of Al/Si versus Ca/Si count ratios for the studied ceramic. The contents of Al and Ca measured by XRF were normalised to the Si content [35]. Green ellipse—light coloured pastes with lower quartz temper. Blue ellipse—light, reddish, and grey brownish pastes with higher quartz temper.
Heritage 07 00105 g009
Figure 10. Selection of representative Santarém (S1, Santarém), and European red (Bruges—Belgium B1, B2, B3) and grey–brown (Zomergem Z1, Z2) fabric pastes. Scale bar: 1 mm.
Figure 10. Selection of representative Santarém (S1, Santarém), and European red (Bruges—Belgium B1, B2, B3) and grey–brown (Zomergem Z1, Z2) fabric pastes. Scale bar: 1 mm.
Heritage 07 00105 g010
Figure 11. Scatterplot of PbO versus SiO2 for glazed surfaces of Santarém and European samples.
Figure 11. Scatterplot of PbO versus SiO2 for glazed surfaces of Santarém and European samples.
Heritage 07 00105 g011
Figure 12. Selection of representative Santarém and European fabric pastes. From top to bottom, quartz temper increases. From left to right, feldspar slightly increases (Na-Ca plagioclase).
Figure 12. Selection of representative Santarém and European fabric pastes. From top to bottom, quartz temper increases. From left to right, feldspar slightly increases (Na-Ca plagioclase).
Heritage 07 00105 g012
Figure 13. Selection of representative Santarém (S2—Santarém) and European (B3—Bruges—Belgium) red combined fabric pastes. Scale bar: 1 mm.
Figure 13. Selection of representative Santarém (S2—Santarém) and European (B3—Bruges—Belgium) red combined fabric pastes. Scale bar: 1 mm.
Heritage 07 00105 g013
Table 1. Main XRD peaks used to identify the minerals in the diffractograms of all ceramic bodies.
Table 1. Main XRD peaks used to identify the minerals in the diffractograms of all ceramic bodies.
Quartz—Q, SiO2, 2θ0 = 21.0, 26.7, 36.7, 46.0, 50.2, 60.0, 64.1, 68.2,
Microcline—Mic, K Al Si3O8, 2θ0 = 20.9, 25.7, 27.5, 42.0, 50.8,
Muscovite—M, KAl2(Si3Al)O10(OH)2, 2θ0 = 8.9, 17.8, 19.8, 25.7,
Illite—I (K, H3O)(Al, Mg, Fe)2(Si, Al)4O10(OH)2) 2θ0 = 8.8, 17.8, 19.8, 25.7,
Rutile—R, TiO2, 2θ0 = 27.3, 36.1, 54.3,
Anatase—A, TiO2, 2θ0 = 25.3, 307.1, 47.9,
Hematite—H, α−Fe2O3, 2θ0 = 24.4, 35.7. 49.6, 54.2, 57.4
Table 2. Chemical composition of the powdered ceramic bodies of the Santarém sherds, obtained by XRF. Data are presented as wt.% for major and minor constituents and ppm for trace elements. (nd: not detected; nq: not quantified).
Table 2. Chemical composition of the powdered ceramic bodies of the Santarém sherds, obtained by XRF. Data are presented as wt.% for major and minor constituents and ppm for trace elements. (nd: not detected; nq: not quantified).
SamplesMgOAl2O3SiO2K2O CaOTiO2Fe2O3Mn Rb Sr ZrNb R (*)
SantarémS11.4112.4473.663.470.671.057.26nd/nq677026622134
S2nd/nq27.1363.103.111.082.842.71nd/nq621222242987
S3nd/nq25.4566.702.180.701.363.61nd/nq55226619135
S4nd/nq22.8968.642.100.771.384.21nd/nq28186610122
S5nd/nq21.0970.402.670.701.383.75nd/nq37218613135
S6nd/nq24.1164.035.300.901.923.71nd/nq1484824036104
S7nd/nq22.0870.322.180.451.333.61nd/nq78289423210
S8nd/nq25.3766.002.410.521.514.16nd/nq945221037182
S91.2925.7762.182.701.551.435.06nd/nq69521192358
S10nd/nq27.3563.842.340.481.614.34nd/nq985924340194
S11nd/nq26.3963.732.771.401.484.21nd/nq81461543067
S12nd/nq25.1365.022.881.121.484.34nd/nq73491352683
S13nd/nq27.8862.472.391.241.314.67nd/nq8154902875
S14nd/nq24.2864.883.151.691.614.36nd/nq90692003255
S15nd/nq26.1864.742.641.171.413.84nd/nq7530872480
S16nd/nq23.9965.042.982.211.544.21nd/nq75661833042
S17nd/nq25.5764.052.241.371.335.41nd/nq84681513067
S18nd/nq22.2069.272.520.691.234.06nd/nq815617831135
S191.4521.7468.142.340.901.204.19nd/nq795920032102
S20nd/nq26.5865.062.310.751.293.9735247nd/nqnd/nq20126
(The estimated error for major elements (Si and Al) was ≤ 3%, for minor elements (K, Ca and Fe) ≤ 4% and for trace elements ≤ 8%). (*) Ratio R = (SiO2 + Al2O3 + K2O)/CaO.
Table 3. Chemical composition of the powdered ceramic bodies of European sherds, obtained by XRF. St, Saintonge; A, Ardenne; Z, Zomergem; B, Bruges; SH, Surrey- Hampshire; K, Kingston; C, Cheam. Data are presented as wt.% for major and minor constituents and ppm for trace elements. (nd: not detected; nq: not quantified).
Table 3. Chemical composition of the powdered ceramic bodies of European sherds, obtained by XRF. St, Saintonge; A, Ardenne; Z, Zomergem; B, Bruges; SH, Surrey- Hampshire; K, Kingston; C, Cheam. Data are presented as wt.% for major and minor constituents and ppm for trace elements. (nd: not detected; nq: not quantified).
SamplesMgOAl2O3SiO2K2O CaOTiO2Fe2O3Mn Rb Sr ZrNb R (*)
SaintongeSt1nd/nq23.0767.512.910.921.733.82nd/nq646317021101
St2nd/nq16.9574.512.791.091.303.30nd/nq432032101886
St3nd/nq18.4272.034.240.831.742.71nd/nq465514920115
St4nd/nq19.7871.762.040.671.823.91nd/nq403816819141
Ardenne and ZomergemA1nd/nq22.2269.611.120.902.693.42nd/nq388727346104
A2nd/nq23.5368.141.241.102.673.28nd/nq30742263884
Z11.5511.2773.213.370.641.088.83nd/nq635832520138
Z21.2011.0974.223.160.541.058.70nd/nq595724820164
BrugesB11.2410.5375.683.230.831.067.39nd/nq596424320108
B21.5413.4669.704.231.341.258.42nd/nq821142682565
B31.1610.6876.683.400.791.046.21nd/nq506022116115
Surrey
Hampshire
SH1nd/nq19.9070.513.410.951.353.84nd/nq372221421599
SH2nd/nq15.1973.692.632.890.924.5836046162871332
SH31.1418.6671.113.000.951.223.85nd/nq673823482998
SH41.2815.9873.632.870.801.094.27nd/nq4638316518115
KingstonK1nd/nq12.4580.032.000.180.884.43nd/nq352212511531
K21.1517.2472.701.680.811.285.11nd/nq333912620113
K31.1715.9374.622.350.711.054.14nd/nq343917817131
K4nd/nq15.6276.532.260.401.014.14nd/nq374524421237
CheamC1nd/nq18.6771.992.530.911.404.48nd/nq457621724102
(The estimated error for major elements (Si and Al) was ≤ 3%, for minor elements (K, Ca and Fe) ≤ 4% and for trace elements ≤ 8%) (*) Ratio, R = (SiO2 + Al2O3 + K2O)/CaO.
Table 4. Chemical composition of the glazed surfaces of Santarém sherds obtained by XRF, wt.%. (nd: not detected; nq: not quantified).
Table 4. Chemical composition of the glazed surfaces of Santarém sherds obtained by XRF, wt.%. (nd: not detected; nq: not quantified).
SamplesColoursMgOAl2O3SiO2K2O CaOTiO2MnOFe2O3NiO CuO ZnO As2O3SnO2PbOPbO/SiO2
SantarémS1Green nd/nq7.0320.200.42nd/nq0.280.281.130.053.760.516.330.1559.873.0
S2Green nd/nq8.9732.331.573.400.340.220.420.073.120.024.860.2044.491.4
Black (grape)nd/nq9.4834.501.171.920.300.241.210.062.600.025.500.1542.851.2
S3Ambernd/nq9.3120.680.35nd/nq0.050.284.400.070.030.026.51nd/nq58.312.8
Brown (scratch)nd/nq9.7121.910.43nd/nqnd/nq0.284.540.120.09nd/nq5.37nd/nq57.562.6
S4Ambernd/nq9.7223.580.51nd/nqnd/nq0.284.570.090.030.025.61nd/nq55.592.4
Brown (scratch)2.939.2222.930.49nd/nq0.030.284.440.080.050.025.89nd/nq53.642.3
S5Green nd/nq9.7034.831.261.630.070.240.570.072.950.025.19nd/nq43.481.2
S6Green nd/nq5.0116.800.2410.02nd/nq0.250.310.075.960.565.960.0854.733.3
S8Green nd/nq9.3529.460.77nd/nq0.060.310.770.111.96nd/nq5.45nd/nq51.761.8
S10 Green nd/nq9.4325.931.046.580.070.240.930.081.670.024.740.0249.261.9
Brown2.489.2825.540.68nd/nq0.050.273.720.070.220.025.78nd/nq51.892.0
S19Green nd/nq7.6449.331.174.490.060.200.670.082.420.023.650.0430.250.6
Table 5. Chemical composition of the glazed surfaces of European sherds obtained by XRF, wt.% (nd: not detected; nq: not quantified).
Table 5. Chemical composition of the glazed surfaces of European sherds obtained by XRF, wt.% (nd: not detected; nq: not quantified).
SamplesColoursMgOAl2O3SiO2K2O CaOTiO2MnOFe2O3NiO CuO ZnO As2O3SnO2PbOPbO/SiO2
BelgiumB1Greennd/nq11.5735.460.42nd/nq0.250.351.410.092.770.575.910.0541.151.2
B3Yellow1.9119.1929.671.78nd/nq0.090.231.190.08nd/nq0.025.100.1340.601.4
A2Creamynd/nq13.5838.230.22nd/nq0.390.291.210.13nd/nq2.545.60nd/nq37.811.0
Z1Brown2.628.9637.520.58nd/nq0.200.233.340.09nd/nq0.035.50nd/nq40.931.1
SaintongeSt1Greennd/nq8.1338.160.30nd/nq0.210.270.940.083.250.466.040.1741.981.1
St2Greennd/nq10.7126.240.801.970.190.331.480.083.180.735.690.1048.481.8
St3Creamynd/nq11.9345.680.73nd/nq0.260.250.990.080.600.025.77nd/nq33.690.7
Greennd/nq11.9138.880.860.640.230.250.990.091.840.005.75nd/nq38.571.0
St4Green2.3813.2335.160.522.900.370.281.640.062.430.035.36nd/nq35.641.0
Surrey-HampshireSH1Green2.5312.1521.790.980.440.170.251.000.094.150.074.920.2851.212.3
SH2Greennd/nq9.5728.340.580.660.140.301.480.112.260.217.260.3948.701.7
SH3Green2.1114.2829.771.361.950.220.210.990.083.170.024.790.0341.021.4
KingstonK1Yellowishnd/nq11.1430.450.50nd/nq0.140.271.340.101.250.035.790.0948.901.6
K2Green2.4412.3930.771.44nd/nq0.170.231.240.085.010.684.330.1741.041.3
Yellowish2.7411.4940.851.32nd/nq0.250.251.480.070.780.134.770.0335.860.9
K3Green2.9011.3926.100.47nd/nq0.190.252.000.094.820.025.280.5445.951.8
Colourlessnd/nq11.9932.810.41nd/nq0.190.271.610.100.910.026.160.4645.071.4
CheamC1Greennd/nq8.5928.570.521.050.160.281.670.083.560.265.790.5948.881.7
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Vieira Ferreira, L.F.; Casimiro, T.M.; Boavida, C.; Costa Pereira, M.F.; Ferreira Machado, I. An Archaeometric Study of Lead-Glazed Medieval Ceramics (13th–14th Century) from Santarém, Portugal. Heritage 2024, 7, 2217-2238. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage7050105

AMA Style

Vieira Ferreira LF, Casimiro TM, Boavida C, Costa Pereira MF, Ferreira Machado I. An Archaeometric Study of Lead-Glazed Medieval Ceramics (13th–14th Century) from Santarém, Portugal. Heritage. 2024; 7(5):2217-2238. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage7050105

Chicago/Turabian Style

Vieira Ferreira, L. F., T. M. Casimiro, C. Boavida, M. F. Costa Pereira, and I. Ferreira Machado. 2024. "An Archaeometric Study of Lead-Glazed Medieval Ceramics (13th–14th Century) from Santarém, Portugal" Heritage 7, no. 5: 2217-2238. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage7050105

APA Style

Vieira Ferreira, L. F., Casimiro, T. M., Boavida, C., Costa Pereira, M. F., & Ferreira Machado, I. (2024). An Archaeometric Study of Lead-Glazed Medieval Ceramics (13th–14th Century) from Santarém, Portugal. Heritage, 7(5), 2217-2238. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage7050105

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop