Impacts of Product Variety and Supply Chain Networks on the Influx of Information Exchange in Industry Applications
Abstract
:1. Introduction
- This paper uses qualitative research based on a case study to investigate and answer our research question, using both major and minor propositions to highlight the impacts of product variety and supply chain networks on the influx of information exchange.
- This paper categorizes and visualizes correspondent opinions to facilitate deep analysis, including factors such as product variety, supply chain network, and information exchange.
- This paper analyzes our case study results, including factors such as product variety, supply chain networks, and information exchange by categorizing the interview raw data.
- This paper discusses the important key factors that can influence the influx of information exchange from the perspective of different industries.
2. Related Work
2.1. Qualitative Research
2.2. Product Variety
2.3. Supply Chain Network
2.4. Information Exchange
3. Methodology
3.1. Major Proposition
- A high degree of product variety correlates with increased supply chain network complexity.
- A high level of product variety and supply chain complexity is associated with an increased frequency of the influx of information exchange within the supply chain network.
Conceptual Modeling Framework
3.2. Minor Proposition
3.2.1. Attribute and Supporting Elements
Product Variety Domain
Supply Chain Network Domain
Information Exchange Domain
3.3. Data Collection
3.3.1. Telephone and Email Inquiry
3.3.2. Semi-Structured Interviews
3.3.3. Re-Review or Cross-Checking Interview Results with Correspondents
3.4. Categorical Data
4. Results and Analysis
4.1. Characteristics of the Correspondents
Correspondent Indicators and Eligibility
4.2. Data Visualization and Analysis
4.2.1. Product Variety
Product Characteristics
Material Characteristics
4.2.2. Supply Chain Network
Coordination
Supply Chain Partners
4.2.3. Information Exchange
Information Sharing
Information Technology Application
5. Conclusions and Discussion
6. Implications
6.1. Theoretical Implications
6.2. Managerial Implications
7. Limitations and Future Work
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Cole, E. Toyota’s Hyper Growth and Complexity Trap. Harv. Bus. Rev. 2010. Available online: https://hbr.org/2010/02/toyota-the-downside-of-hyper-g (accessed on 19 October 2021).
- Scavarda, L.F.; Schaffer, J.; Scavarda, A.J.; da Cunha Reis, A.; Schleich, H. Product variety: An auto industry analysis and a benchmarking study. Benchmarking Int. J. 2009, 16, 387–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scavarda, L.F.; Reichhart, A.; Hamacher, S.; Holweg, M. Managing product variety in emerging markets. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 2010, 30, 205–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mocker, M.; Ross, J.W. The problem with product proliferation. Harv. Bus. Rev. 2017, 2017, 8. [Google Scholar]
- Santos, V.; Sampaio, M.; Alliprandini, D.H. The impact of product variety on fill rate, inventory and sales performance in the consumer goods industry. J. Manuf. Technol. Manag. 2020, 31, 1481–1505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- ElMaraghy, H.; Schuh, G.; ElMaraghy, W.; Piller, F.; Schönsleben, P.; Tseng, M.; Bernard, A. Product variety management. CIRP Ann. 2013, 62, 629–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bode, C.; Wagner, S.M. Structural drivers of upstream supply chain complexity and the frequency of supply chain disruptions. J. Oper. Manag. 2015, 36, 215–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shou, Y.; Li, Y.; Park, Y.W.; Kang, M. The impact of product complexity and variety on supply chain integration. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 2017, 47, 297–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Laureijs, R.E.; Fuchs, E.R.; Whitefoot, K.S. Is more less? Benefits and costs of high-variety production in nonassembled manufacturing. J. Mech. Des. 2019, 141, 061703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mateo-Fornés, J.; Soto-Silva, W.; González-Araya, M.C.; Plà-Aragonès, L.M.; Solsona-Tehas, F. Managing quality, supplier selection, and cold-storage contracts in agrifood supply chain through stochastic optimization. Int. Trans. Oper. Res. 2023, 30, 1901–1930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Löfsten, H. Product innovation processes and the trade-off between product innovation performance and business performance. Eur. J. Innov. Manag. 2014, 17, 61–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duan, Y.; Yao, Y.; Huo, J. Bullwhip effect under substitute products. J. Oper. Manag. 2015, 36, 75–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wan, X.; Britto, R.; Zhou, Z. In search of the negative relationship between product variety and inventory turnover. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2020, 222, 107503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Golrizgashti, S.; Hosseini, S.; Zhu, Q.; Sarkis, J. Evaluating supply chain dynamics in the presence of product deletion. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2023, 255, 108722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stief, P.; Etienne, A.; Dantan, J.Y.; Siadat, A. A methodology for production system design driven by product modelling and analysis–application in the automotive industry. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2023, 61, 1341–1357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Busse, C.; Schleper, M.; Niu, M.; Wagner, S. Supplier development for sustainability: Contextual barriers in global supply chains. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 2016, 46, 442–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Motiwalla, L.F.; Thompson, J. Enterprise Systems for Management; Pearson Prentice Hall: New Jersey, NJ, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Cooper, M.C.; Ellram, L.M. Characteristics of supply chain management and the implications for purchasing and logistics strategy. Int. J. Logist. Manag. 1993, 4, 13–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cooper, M.; Lambert, D.; Pagh, J. Supply Chain Management: More Than a New Name for Logistics. Int. J. Logist. Manag. 1997, 8, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lambert, D.; Cooper, M.; Pagh, J. Supply Chain Management: Implementation Issues and Research Opportunities. Int. J. Logist. Manag. 1998, 9, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sivadasan, S.; Efstathiou, J.; Frizelle, G.; Shirazi, R.; Calinescu, A. An information-theoretic methodology for measuring the operational complexity of supplier-customer systems. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 2002, 22, 80–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sivadasan, S.; Efstathiou, J.; Calinescu, A.; Huatuco, L.H. Advances on measuring the operational complexity of supplier–customer systems. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2006, 171, 208–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sivadasan, S.; Smart, J.; Huaccho Huatuco, L.; Calinescu, A. Operational complexity and supplier–customer integration: Case study insights and complexity rebound. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 2010, 61, 1709–1718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sivadasan, S.; Smart, J.; Huatuco, L.H.; Calinescu, A. Reducing schedule instability by identifying and omitting complexity-adding information flows at the supplier–customer interface. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2013, 145, 253–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oghazi, P.; Rad, F.F.; Karlsson, S.; Haftor, D. RFID and ERP systems in supply chain management. Eur. J. Manag. Bus. Econ. 2018, 27, 171–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Welker, G.A.; van der Vaart, T.; van Donk, D.P. The influence of business conditions on supply chain information-sharing mechanisms: A study among supply chain links of SMEs. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2008, 113, 706–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, X.; van Donk, D.P.; van Der Vaart, T. Does ICT influence supply chain management and performance? A review of survey-based research. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 2011, 31, 1215–1247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van der Vaart, T.; van Donk, D.P.; Gimenez, C.; Sierra, V. Modelling the integration-performance relationship: Collaborative practices, enablers and contextual factors. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 2012, 32, 1043–1074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sanders, N.; Wan, X. Mitigating forecast errors from product variety through information sharing. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2018, 56, 4356–4367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, X.; Wang, P.; Pal, R. The effects of agro-food supply chain integration on product quality and financial performance: Evidence from Chinese agro-food processing business. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2021, 231, 107832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boon-itt, S.; Wong, C.Y. The moderating effects of technological and demand uncertainties on the relationship between supply chain integration and customer delivery performance. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 2011, 41, 253–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sundram, V.P.K.; Chandran, V.; Bhatti, M.A. Supply chain practices and performance: The indirect effects of supply chain integration. Benchmarking Int. J. 2016, 23, 1445–1471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Donk, D.P.; van der Vaart, T. Business conditions, shared resources and integrative practices in the supply chain. J. Purch. Supply Manag. 2004, 10, 107–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van der Vaart, T.; Van Donk, D.P. Buyer focus: Evaluation of a new concept for supply chain integration. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2004, 92, 21–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van der Vaart, T.; van Donk, D.P. Buyer-focused operations as a supply chain strategy: Identifying the influence of business characteristics. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 2006, 26, 8–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gimenez, C.; Vaart, T.; Van Donk, D.P. Supply chain integration and performance: The moderating effect of supply complexity. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 2012, 32, 583–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wan, X.; Evers, P.T.; Dresner, M.E. Too much of a good thing: The impact of product variety on operations and sales performance. J. Oper. Manag. 2012, 30, 316–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Le, S.; Wu, J.; Zhong, J. Relationship quality and supply chain quality performance: The effect of supply chain integration in hotel industry. Comput. Intell. 2021, 37, 1388–1404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Creswell, J.W. Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research; Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 2002; Volume 7. [Google Scholar]
- Creswell, J.W.; Poth, C.N. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches; Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Bogdan, R.; Biklen, S. Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction to Theories and Methods; Allyn & Bacon Boston: Massachusetts, MA, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Faggioni, F.; Rossi, M.V.; Sestino, A. Supply Chain Resilience in the Pharmaceutical Industry: A Qualitative Analysis from Scholarly and Managerial Perspectives. Int. J. Bus. Manag. 2023, 18, 129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhalla, R.; Chowdhary, N. Green workers of Himalayas: Evidence of transformation induced regeneration. J. Tour. Futur. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rozas, S.; Michaud, V.; Rhéaume, J. What’s Your History? Methodological Prospects and Challenges of Using Life-History Narratives as an Alternative Method to Assess Nonprofits’ Impacts. Int. J. Volunt. Nonprofit Organ. 2022, 33, 1122–1131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beaudonnet, L.; Belot, C.; Caune, H.; Houde, A.M.; Pennetreau, D. Narrating Europe: (Re-)constructed and Contested Visions of the European Project in Citizens’ Discourse. JCMS J. Common Mark. Stud. 2023, 61, 161–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rogerson, M.; Parry, G.C. Blockchain: Case studies in food supply chain visibility. Supply Chain Manag. Int. J. 2020, 25, 601–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Madar, R.T.; Yohay, N.Z.; Cohen, O.G.; Cohen, L.; Newman-Heiman, N.; Dvori, Y. Post-Bariatric Surgery Care in Israeli Adolescents: A Qualitative Study. Clin. Nurs. Res. 2021, 30, 1281–1289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Muchineripi, J.; Chinyamurindi, W.; Chimucheka, T. African immigrants self-employment journey: Navigating contextual challenges in South Africa. J. Glob. Mobility Home Expatr. Manag. Res. 2022, 10, 530–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zainal, K.A.; Barlas, J. Mental health, stressors and resources in migrant domestic workers in Singapore: A thematic analysis of in-depth interviews. Int. J. Intercult. Relat. 2022, 90, 116–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Otieno, R. Development of a conceptual framework of the role of sizing in marketing strategy within clothing firms: Indications from in-depth interviews with manufacturers. J. Fash. Mark. Manag. 2000, 4, 337–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheong, H.; Baksh-Mohammed, S. U.S. consumer m-commerce involvement: Using in-depth interviews to propose an acceptance model of shopping apps-based m-commerce. Cogent Bus. Manag. 2019, 6, 1674077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Owino, J.; Weber, C.D. Explicating anomie in refugee women’s integration narratives: A qualitative research study. Int. J. Intercult. Relat. 2020, 74, 69–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gilman, A.; Henley, S.C.; Quinlan, J. Understanding barriers to consumers to stop washing raw poultry through in-depth interviews. Br. Food J. 2022, 124, 3411–3427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, R.Y.M.; Shi, M.; Abankwa, D.A.; Xu, Y.; Richter, A.; Ng, K.T.W.; Song, L. Exploring the market requirements for smart and traditional ageing housing units: A mixed methods approach. Smart Cities 2022, 5, 1752–1775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ton, Z.; Raman, A. The effect of product variety and inventory levels on retail store sales: A longitudinal study. Prod. Oper. Manag. 2010, 19, 546–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, G.; Lee, H.S.; Son, J. Product variety in local grocery stores: Differential effects on stock-keeping unit level sales. J. Oper. Manag. 2022, 68, 33–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- ElMaraghy, H.A. Flexible and reconfigurable manufacturing systems paradigms. Int. J. Flex. Manuf. Syst. 2005, 17, 261–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wan, X.; Sanders, N.R. The negative impact of product variety: Forecast bias, inventory levels, and the role of vertical integration. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2017, 186, 123–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bortolini, M.; Galizia, F.G.; Mora, C. Reconfigurable manufacturing systems: Literature review and research trend. J. Manuf. Syst. 2018, 49, 93–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Battistello, L.; Haug, A.; Trattner, A.; Hvam, L. A classification of barriers to product variety reduction. CIRP J. Manuf. Sci. Technol. 2021, 35, 517–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mentzer, J.T.; DeWitt, W.; Keebler, J.S.; Min, S.; Nix, N.W.; Smith, C.D.; Zacharia, Z.G. Defining supply chain management. J. Bus. Logist. 2001, 22, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Choi, T.Y.; Hong, Y. Unveiling the structure of supply networks: Case studies in Honda, Acura, and DaimlerChrysler. J. Oper. Manag. 2002, 20, 469–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, C.Y.; Chen, T.L.; Chen, Y.Y. An analysis of the structural complexity of supply chain networks. Appl. Math. Model. 2014, 38, 2328–2344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aitken, J.; Bozarth, C.; Garn, W. To eliminate or absorb supply chain complexity: A conceptual model and case study. Supply Chain Manag. Int. J. 2016, 21, 759–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vrabič, R.; Butala, P. Computational mechanics approach to managing complexity in manufacturing systems. CIRP Ann. 2011, 60, 503–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sabet, E.; Yazdani, N.; De Leeuw, S. Supply chain integration strategies in fast evolving industries. Int. J. Logist. Manag. 2017, 28, 29–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Huddiniah, E.R.; ER, M. Product Variety, Supply Chain Complexity and the Needs for Information Technology: A Framework Based on Literature Review. Oper. Supply Chain Manag. Int. J. 2019, 12, 245–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramayah, T.; Omar, R. Information exchange and supply chain performance. Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak. IJITDM 2010, 9, 35–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ye, F.; Wang, Z. Effects of information technology alignment and information sharing on supply chain operational performance. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2013, 65, 370–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ganesh, M.; Raghunathan, S.; Rajendran, C. The value of information sharing in a multi-product, multi-level supply chain: Impact of product substitution, demand correlation, and partial information sharing. Decis. Support Syst. 2014, 58, 79–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vanpoucke, E.; Vereecke, A.; Muylle, S. Leveraging the impact of supply chain integration through information technology. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 2017, 37, 510–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Syed, A.S.; Sierra-Sosa, D.; Kumar, A.; Elmaghraby, A. IoT in smart cities: A survey of technologies, practices and challenges. Smart Cities 2021, 4, 429–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prajogo, D.; Olhager, J. Supply chain integration and performance: The effects of long-term relationships, information technology and sharing, and logistics integration. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2012, 135, 514–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miranda, M.G.; Borges, R. Technology-based business incubators: An exploratory analysis of intra-organizational social networks. Innov. Manag. Rev. 2019, 16, 36–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Garay-Rondero, C.L.; Martinez-Flores, J.L.; Smith, N.R.; Morales, S.O.C.; Aldrette-Malacara, A. Digital supply chain model in Industry 4.0. J. Manuf. Technol. Manag. 2020, 31, 887–933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gelderman, C.J.; Semeijn, J.; Ter Avest, F.; Peeters, E. Social capital, power and information sharing–evidence from the Dutch meat processing industry. Br. Food J. 2020, 122, 3343–3360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, H.; Shou, Y.; Zhai, X.; Li, L.; Wood, C.; Wu, X. Supply chain practice and information quality: A supply chain strategy study. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2014, 147, 624–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Del Giudice, M.; Chierici, R.; Mazzucchelli, A.; Fiano, F. Supply chain management in the era of circular economy: The moderating effect of big data. Int. J. Logist. Manag. 2021, 32, 337–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Foli, S.; Durst, S.; Temel, S. The link between supply chain risk management and innovation performance in SMEs in turbulent times. J. Entrep. Emerg. Econ. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Perona, M.; Miragliotta, G. Complexity management and supply chain performance assessment. A field study and a conceptual framework. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2004, 90, 103–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, H.Y.; Seo, Y.J.; Dinwoodie, J. Supply chain integration and logistics performance: The role of supply chain dynamism. Int. J. Logist. Manag. 2016, 27, 668–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qrunfleh, S.; Tarafdar, M. Supply chain information systems strategy: Impacts on supply chain performance and firm performance. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2014, 147, 340–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Serdarasan, S. A review of supply chain complexity drivers. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2013, 66, 533–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Auramo, J.; Kauremaa, J.; Tanskanen, K. Benefits of IT in supply chain management: An explorative study of progressive companies. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 2005, 35, 82–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Flick, U. The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Data Collection; SAGE Publications Ltd.: London, UK, 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Domain | Literature Studies | Attributes |
---|---|---|
Product Variety | [6,7,8,17,21,22,26,33,35,36,57,83] | Product Characteristics |
Material Characteristics | ||
Supply Chain Network | [7,8,17,21,22,23,24,26,33,35,36,83] | Coordination |
Supply Chain Partner | ||
Information Exchange | [7,8,17,21,22,23,24,26,27,33,36,83,84] | Information Sharing |
Information Technology Application |
Respondent Characteristics | Freq. | Respondent Characteristics | Freq. | Company Characteristics | Freq. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gender | Division | Industry sector | |||
Man | 39 | Marketing | 30 | Manufacturing Industry | 29 |
Woman | 10 | Sales | 4 | Commerce | 14 |
Age (in years) | Production | 3 | Service | 6 | |
21–30 | 12 | Bakery | 2 | Production strategies | |
31–35 | 7 | IT | 2 | MTS | 37 |
36–40 | 7 | Administration | 1 | MTO | 9 |
41≤ | 23 | Business | 1 | Service | 3 |
Education | Consultant | 1 | Total employees (in people) | ||
Bachelor’s degree | 28 | Distributor | 1 | ≤10 | 9 |
Senior high school | 17 | Electric | 1 | 11–20 | 8 |
Associate’s degree | 2 | Engineering | 1 | 21–50 | 4 |
Master’s degree | 2 | Instructor | 1 | 51–100 | 3 |
Working experience (in years) | Fishery | 1 | 101≤ | 25 | |
1–6 | 18 | Job title | Volume of sales | ||
7–11 | 5 | Sales | 12 | ≤1000 | 8 |
12–16 | 3 | Owner | 11 | 1001–10,000 | 7 |
17–21 | 10 | Manager | 10 | 10,001–100,000 | 8 |
22–26 | 6 | Staff | 6 | 100,001–1,000,001 | 3 |
26–31 | 5 | Supervisor | 6 | 1,000,001≤ | 23 |
32≤ | 2 | Director | 2 | ||
Account Officer | 1 | ||||
Teacher | 1 |
Product Market Share | Main Product Type | New Products Introduced | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Instrument Questions | Freq. | Instrument Questions | Freq. | Instrument Questions | Freq. | Instrument Questions | Freq. |
Market share | Main product type | Main product | New products (in years) | ||||
Individual customer | 47 | FnB | 29 | Instant noodle | 17 | ≤5 | 10 |
Industrial customer | 39 | TCLF | 4 | Seasonings | 13 | 6–10 | 31 |
Grocery Store | 4 | Groceries | 6 | 11≤ | 8 | ||
Tobacco | 3 | Tobacco | 3 | Influenced factor | |||
Pulp and Paper | 2 | Clothing & footwear | 2 | Price | 33 | ||
Bank | 1 | Leather wallet | 2 | Advertisement | 22 | ||
Consultant | 1 | Pastry and bakery | 2 | Product Quality | 19 | ||
Daily Newspaper | 1 | Printing business | 2 | Taste | 12 | ||
Electrical Equipment | 1 | Restaurant | 2 | Demand | 8 | ||
Material Warehouse | 1 | Agricultural consumer product | 1 | Packaging | 7 | ||
Tutoring Institution | 1 | Bank | 1 | Supply | 3 | ||
Wood-Based and Furniture | 1 | Building Material | 1 | Competitor | 2 | ||
Seasonal production | Consultant service | 1 | Innovation | 2 | |||
No | 37 | Fish food | 1 | Time | 2 | ||
Yes | 12 | Fruits & vegetables | 1 | Efficiency | 1 | ||
Furniture | 1 | Material | 1 | ||||
Machine | 1 | Technology | 1 | ||||
Newspaper | 1 | ||||||
Tutoring institution | 1 |
Material Type | Material Interactions | Material Source | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Instrument Questions | Freq. | Instrument Questions | Freq. | Instrument Questions | Freq. |
Material Importance | Production–Material Dependency | Alternative Suppliers | |||
Very Important | 49 | High dependency | 49 | Fixed | 29 |
Bill of Materials | Dependency Material Solution | Depend on | 20 | ||
FnB ingredients | 26 | Keeping stock raw material | 19 | Raw Material Origins | |
Groceries | 7 | Alternative supplier | 15 | Domestic | 49 |
Paper | 3 | Finding best supplier | 10 | Import | 18 |
People | 3 | Target fulfillment | 3 | Supplier Specifications | |
Tobacco | 3 | Production sharing | 1 | Quality | 40 |
Leather | 2 | Raw material substitution | 1 | Price | 35 |
Textile | 2 | Availability | 20 | ||
Building material | 1 | Delivery time | 2 | ||
Iron | 1 | ||||
Stainless | 1 | ||||
Wood-based ingredients | 1 |
Coordinations | Supply Chain Partner | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Coordination Mechanism | Supplier | Customer | |||
Instrument Questions | Freq. | Instrument Questions | Freq. | Instrument Questions | Freq. |
Coordination Communications | Supplier Distance (km) | Customer Distance (km) | |||
Application | 24 | 11–100 | 20 | 11–100 | 49 |
Text message | 21 | 101–1000 | 35 | 101–1000 | 40 |
Direct coordination | 11 | 1001≤ | 25 | 1001≤ | 35 |
Social media | 10 | Supplier Resources | Customer Locations | ||
Coordination Activities | Local supplier | 49 | Local customer | 49 | |
Inventory management | 35 | International supplier | 10 | International customer | 25 |
Price negotiation | 30 | Offline store | 7 | ||
Manage collaboration | 25 | Company | 2 | ||
Product quality | 15 | Online store | 2 | ||
Challenging | |||||
Price agreement | 28 | ||||
Availability | 25 | ||||
Distance | 15 | ||||
New Product | 10 | ||||
Competitor | 7 |
Information Sharing | Information Technology Application | ||
---|---|---|---|
Information Flow | Information Carrier | ||
Instrument Questions | Freq. | Instrument Questions | Freq. |
Information Exchanges | IT Applications | ||
Important | 49 | Social media | 49 |
Information Exchange Intensity | ERP | 25 | |
High intensity | 34 | Real-time Accessibility | |
Depends | 15 | No | 27 |
Information exchange on suppliers | Yes | 22 | |
Availability of material | 43 | IT Implementation Factors | |
Price | 41 | Information exchange | 46 |
Material specification | 25 | Digital technology | 37 |
Delivery schedule | 20 | Coordination | 28 |
Program promotion | 17 | Market share | 18 |
Information Exchange on Customers | IT Implementation Impact | ||
Price | 45 | Expanding market share | 48 |
Product availability | 42 | Effectiveness and efficiency | 46 |
Product specification | 35 | Increasing profitability | 35 |
Program promotion | 19 | Flexibility | 20 |
Delivery schedule | 18 | ||
New product | 10 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Huddiniah, E.R.; Pradana, H. Impacts of Product Variety and Supply Chain Networks on the Influx of Information Exchange in Industry Applications. Smart Cities 2023, 6, 1059-1086. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities6020051
Huddiniah ER, Pradana H. Impacts of Product Variety and Supply Chain Networks on the Influx of Information Exchange in Industry Applications. Smart Cities. 2023; 6(2):1059-1086. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities6020051
Chicago/Turabian StyleHuddiniah, Estu Rizky, and Hilmil Pradana. 2023. "Impacts of Product Variety and Supply Chain Networks on the Influx of Information Exchange in Industry Applications" Smart Cities 6, no. 2: 1059-1086. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities6020051
APA StyleHuddiniah, E. R., & Pradana, H. (2023). Impacts of Product Variety and Supply Chain Networks on the Influx of Information Exchange in Industry Applications. Smart Cities, 6(2), 1059-1086. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities6020051