Next Article in Journal
Seismic Response of a Cable-Stayed Bridge with Concrete-Filled Steel Tube (CFST) Pylons Equipped with the Seesaw System
Previous Article in Journal
Exceptional Cluster of Simultaneous Shallow Landslides in Rwanda: Context, Triggering Factors, and Potential Warnings
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

GIS-Based Risk Assessment of Building Vulnerability in Flood Zones of Naic, Cavite, Philippines Using AHP and TOPSIS

by
Shashi Rani Singh
1,
Ehsan Harirchian
1,*,
Cris Edward F. Monjardin
2 and
Tom Lahmer
1
1
Institute of Structural Mechanics (ISM), Bauhaus-Universität Weimar, 99423 Weimar, Germany
2
School of Civil, Environmental, and Geological Engineering, Mapua University, Manila 1002, Philippines
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
GeoHazards 2024, 5(4), 1040-1073; https://doi.org/10.3390/geohazards5040050
Submission received: 4 July 2024 / Revised: 16 September 2024 / Accepted: 26 September 2024 / Published: 2 October 2024

Abstract

Floods pose significant challenges globally, particularly in coastal regions like the Philippines, which are vulnerable to typhoons and subsequent inundations. This study focuses on Naic city in Cavite, Philippines, using Geographic Information Systems (GIS) to develop flood risk maps employing two Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) methods including Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). These maps integrate hazard, vulnerability, and exposure assessments to identify structures most vulnerable to flooding. Weight assignments in the study are derived from a literature review and expert opinions, reflecting the Philippines’ flood-prone geography and historical data. Structural attributes, categorized on a low to very high scale, were assessed based on field survey data from 555 buildings. AHP categorized 91.3% of buildings as moderate to very high risk, whereas TOPSIS placed 68% in this category, underscoring methodological disparities in data handling and assumptions. This research enhances understanding of flood threats and offers a decision-making framework for resilient flood risk management strategies. Identifying vulnerable buildings aims to support informed urban planning and disaster preparedness in flood-prone areas, thereby mitigating potential property, infrastructure, and livelihood damage.
Keywords: flood; risk assessment; buildings; AHP; TOPSIS; GIS flood; risk assessment; buildings; AHP; TOPSIS; GIS

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Singh, S.R.; Harirchian, E.; Monjardin, C.E.F.; Lahmer, T. GIS-Based Risk Assessment of Building Vulnerability in Flood Zones of Naic, Cavite, Philippines Using AHP and TOPSIS. GeoHazards 2024, 5, 1040-1073. https://doi.org/10.3390/geohazards5040050

AMA Style

Singh SR, Harirchian E, Monjardin CEF, Lahmer T. GIS-Based Risk Assessment of Building Vulnerability in Flood Zones of Naic, Cavite, Philippines Using AHP and TOPSIS. GeoHazards. 2024; 5(4):1040-1073. https://doi.org/10.3390/geohazards5040050

Chicago/Turabian Style

Singh, Shashi Rani, Ehsan Harirchian, Cris Edward F. Monjardin, and Tom Lahmer. 2024. "GIS-Based Risk Assessment of Building Vulnerability in Flood Zones of Naic, Cavite, Philippines Using AHP and TOPSIS" GeoHazards 5, no. 4: 1040-1073. https://doi.org/10.3390/geohazards5040050

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop