Next Article in Journal
Green Synthesis of Sodium Cyanide Using Hydrogen Cyanide Extracted under Vacuum from Cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) Leaves
Previous Article in Journal
Development of a Binder-Free Tetra-Metallic Oxide Electrocatalyst for Efficient Oxygen Evolution Reaction
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Fast and Efficient Mechanosynthesis of Aldonamides by Aminolysis of Unprotected Sugar Lactones

Laboratoire de Glycochimie, des Antimicrobiens et des Agroressources (LG2A) UMR CNRS 7378, Institut de Chimie de Picardie CNRS FR 3085, Université de Picardie Jules Verne, 33 Rue Saint Leu, FR-80039 Amiens, France
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustain. Chem. 2022, 3(3), 300-311; https://doi.org/10.3390/suschem3030019
Submission received: 16 May 2022 / Revised: 10 June 2022 / Accepted: 20 June 2022 / Published: 22 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Topic Green and Sustainable Chemistry)

Abstract

:
Sugar amides, such as aldonamides, are interesting, sugar-based molecules used in various fields, from detergency to medicine. Nevertheless, their valorization, especially as alternatives to petroleum-based substances, can be slowed down by their synthetic pathway, which is generally not in accordance with green chemistry principles, and is also not economically competitive. We propose herein a fast procedure for the synthesis of aldonamide-derived glycoconjugates with mechanochemistry. The conditions were first optimized with galactonolactone, used as a model lactone, and dodecylamine. After only 5 min of grinding of stoechiometric amounts of amine and lactone, in the presence of water used as a Liquid Assisted Grinding (LAG) agent, the corresponding galactonamide was isolated with a high yield (90%) after a simple aqueous work-up. The optimized conditions were then applied to a wide variety of amines and sugar lactones, showing the versatility of the methodology. Gluco- and ribono-lactone exhibited similarly excellent reactivity, showing that the procedure is not sugar-dependent. Furthermore, the procedure was shown to be compatible with various functional groups such as alkene, alkyne, thiol, ester and hydroxyl.

1. Introduction

Thanks to their renewability and abundance, the use of carbohydrates as biomass feedstock, and their eco-friendly conversion into glycoconjugates, are becoming increasingly attractive as potential alternatives to petroleum-based chemicals [1]. In particular, aldonamides, defined as the amides of aldonic acids, were demonstrated to show various properties according to the nature of the amide moiety. The presence of lipophilic alkyl chains linked to hydrophilic sugar heads, leading to N-alkyl-aldonamides, confers them amphiphilic properties, making them potential alternatives to petroleum-based surfactants [2]. For example, a composition comprising N-alkyl-D-gluconamide molecules was very recently patented as a hair conditioning agent by the Henkel group [3]. Otherwise, N-alkyl-aldonamides have been reported as good stabilizing agents for microemulsions [4,5] and as hydrogelators [6]. Foamability properties have also been observed for derivatives such as N-alkyl-N-(2-hydroxyethyl) and N-cycloalkylaldonamides [7,8]. Properties of some aldonamides are also interesting for biological applications: abilities to protect hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells against cryoinjury (i.e., ice recrystallization inhibitory properties) [9,10] or bacteriostatic properties on some gram-positive bacteria [11,12] were reported, among others. In addition, aldonamides have been described as intermediates for the synthesis of glycoconjugates, evaluated as glucose-sensing materials [13], or for the synthesis of neo-glycoconjugates [14,15,16,17]. For several years, our group has been involved in the design of N-alkylaldonamides and their derivatives as sugar-based surfactants [18,19,20].
Overall, N-alkyl-aldonamides can be obtained either by (1) the oxidative amidation of aldoses or by (2) the aminolysis of aldonolactones. Metal-free one-pot procedures have been described for the first strategy. Nevertheless, starting materials need to be at least partially protected, which leads to multistep protocols including protection/deprotection steps and, thus, to poor atom efficiency [21,22]. A direct method was described in 2009, but an excess of amines (4 eq) was necessary and the obtained glyconamides needed to be protected (e.g., peracetylation) to be purified [23]. The second strategy is the reaction of the alkylamine with either an aldonic acid or its cyclic derivative (lactone), but the use of large quantities of hazardous solvents, such as pyridine [24], DMF [25] or DMSO [26], and long reaction times under reflux, are often necessary. Thus, the development of a more eco-friendly procedure, allowing for the modification of non-protected sugars respecting green chemistry principles, represents a challenge for the aldonamide synthesis and, thus, for their valorization.
In recent years, mechanochemical techniques have appeared as an efficient method to reduce or eliminate the use of solvents and to enhance the efficiency of several organic reactions [27,28,29]. Moreover, it is possible to reduce the environmental footprint of the synthesis by decreasing the reaction time and the number of steps. This technique is particularly appropriate to compounds with opposite polarities, which cannot react in conventional solvent media. Mechanochemical transformations, which have been reported over the three last decades, are conducted in automated ball mills for a wide range of organic transformations [30,31,32,33,34,35]. They fulfill a similar function to grinding with a mortar and pestle, but in a reproducible manner. Different types of grinding equipment are commercially available, in particular vibrational and planetary ball mills. In a previous study, we successfully used a ball mill to synthesize a broad range of glycosylamines and glycamines from free sugars [36,37]. Furthermore, a very recent article dealing with the direct amidation of esters in a ball mill highlighted (during the course of our study) the requirement for more eco-friendly approaches for the synthesis of amide groups [38].
Herein, we report a fast and efficient synthesis of aldonamides by the aminolysis of unprotected lactones in solvent-free conditions (Scheme 1). This reaction is ecofriendly: (1) it is performed on renewable feedstocks, (2) all of the atoms of the reagents are involved in the final product, in respect with atom economy principle, (3) solventless conditions allow for a reduction in waste and toxicity, etc. The aminolysis procedure was firstly optimized on two model molecules (γ-galactonolactone and dodecylamine) before being applied to a variety of lactones and amines, allowing us to show both the versatility and the limits of the method. As described below, the nature of the amine particularly influences the success of this procedure.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. General

All chemicals were purchased from Fluka, Acros Organics and Sigma Aldrich, and were used as received. Reactions were conducted in a high-speed vibrational ball mill (Spex 8000M) in a stainless steel jar (volume: 60 mL) with stainless steel balls (diameter: 13 mm, 6 mm and 4 mm). Syntheses were monitored by thin-layer chromatography (TLC) on silica gel 60 F254 plates (Merck) and detection was conducted by charring with ninhydrine reagent.
Electrospray high-resolution mass spectrometry experiments (ESI-HRMS) were performed on a SYNAPT G2-Si-Q-TOF hybrid quadrupole time-of-flight instrument (Waters, Manchester, UK). NMR analyses were performed on a BRUKER DRX spectrometer (Bruker, Wissembourg, France), operating at 400 MHz for 1H analysis and 100 MHz 13C analysis. Samples were prepared in DMSO-d6. Assignments for 1H and 13C signals were performed using correlated spectroscopy (COSY) and heteronuclear single quantum correlation (HSQC).

2.2. General Optimized Procedure

Lactone (500 mg), amine (1 eq.) and H2O used as a LAG (0.25 mL) were introduced into a stainless steel jar containing the stainless steel balls. The jar was placed in the vibrational ball-mill and was shaken at 18 Hz. After milling, the reaction mixture was scratched off the vessel in a minimum of water. Depending on the amine, the product could be soluble in water; in this case, it was recovered by evaporation. If the as-obtained amide was not soluble in water, it was recovered by filtration.

2.3. Crudes Characterization Data

N-dodecyl-d-galactonamide 1a. Characterization data in accordance with the literature [39].
N-dodecyl-d-ribonamide 3a. Characterization data in accordance with the literature [40].
N-dodecyl-d-gluconamide 4a. Characterization data in accordance with the literature [41].
N-tetradecyl-d-gluconamide 4b. White powder. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 7.58 (t, J = 5.8 Hz, 1H, NH), 5.33 (d, J = 5.0 Hz, 1H, OH-2), 4.52 (d, J = 4.6 Hz, 1H, OH-3), 4.45 (d, J = 4.9 Hz, 1H, OH-4), 4.37 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H, OH-5), 4.32 (t, J = 5.6 Hz, 1H, OH-6), 3.96 (t, J = 4.2 Hz, 1H, H-2), 3.92–3.86 (m, 1H, H-5), 3.61–3.52 (m, 1H, H-6), 3.52–3.41 (m, 2H, H-3, H-4), 3.37 (dd, J = 10.9, 5.5 Hz, 1H, H-6′), 3.12–2.99 (m, 2H, CH2-N), 1.45–1.35 (m, 2H, CH2-CH2-N), 1.31–1.17 (s, 20H, -CH2- alkyl), 0.85 (t, J = 6.7 Hz, 3H, CH3). 13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 172.2 (C=O), 73.6 (C-2), 72.4 (C-3), 71.5 (C-4), 70.1 (C-5), 63.4 (C-6), 38.3 (CH2-N), 31.3, 29.2, 29.1 (2s), 29.0, 28.8, 28.7, 26.4, 22.1 (CH2 alkyl), 14.0 (CH3). HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C20H41NO6Na [M + Na]+ 414.2832, found 414.2829. FT-IR ν (cm−1) 3296.4, 2918.3, 2805.8, 1624.1, 1548.8, 1085.9, 1030.0.
N-butyl-d-gluconamide 4c. Characterization data in accordance with the literature [24].
N-allyl-d-gluconamide 4e. Characterization data in accordance with the literature [25].
N-propargyl-d-gluconamide 4f. Characterization data in accordance with the literature [42].
N-benzyl-d-gluconamide 4h. Characterization data in accordance with the literature [24].
N,N′-1,3-butanediylbis-d-gluconamide 4i′. White powder. Isolated yield 39%. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 7.61 (br s, 2H, NH), 5.34 (br s, 2H, OH-2), 4.55 (br s, 8H, OH-3, OH-4, OH-5, OH-6), 3.97 (d, J = 2.5 Hz, 2H, H-2), 3.90 (s, 2H, H-5), 3.57 (d J = 10.7 Hz, 2H, H-6), 3.47 (s, 4H, H-3, H-4), 3.42–3.28 (m, 2H, H-6′), 3.08 (s, 4H, CH2-N), 1.40 (s, 4H, CH2-CH2-N). 13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 172.3 (C=O), 73.7 (C-2), 72.4 (C-3), 71.5 (C-4), 70.1 (C-5), 63.4 (C-6), 38.0 (CH2-N), 26.4 (-CH2-CH2-N). HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C16H32N2O12Na [M + Na]+ 467.1853, found 467.1850. FT-IR ν (cm−1) 3300.2, 2935.7, 1624.1, 1546.9, 1469.76, 1446.6, 1085.9, 1030.0.
N,N′-1,3-butanediylbis-d-gluconamide 4i′. White powder. Isolated yield 39%. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 7.61 (br s, 2H, NH), 5.34 (br s, 2H, OH-2), 4.55 (br s, 8H, OH-3, OH-4, OH-5, OH-6), 3.97 (d, J = 2.5 Hz, 2H, H-2), 3.90 (s, 2H, H-5), 3.57 (d J = 10.7 Hz, 2H, H-6), 3.47 (s, 4H, H-3, H-4), 3.42–3.28 (m, 2H, H-6′), 3.08 (s, 4H, CH2-N), 1.40 (s, 4H, CH2-CH2-N). 13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 172.3 (C=O), 73.7 (C-2), 72.4 (C-3), 71.5 (C-4), 70.1 (C-5), 63.4 (C-6), 38.0 (CH2-N), 26.4 (-CH2-CH2-N). HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C16H32N2O12Na [M + Na]+ 467.1853, found 467.1850. FT-IR ν (cm−1) 3300.2, 2935.7, 1624.1, 1546.9, 1469.76, 1446.6, 1085.9, 1030.0.
N-(3-hydroxypropyl)-d-gluconamide 4j. White powder. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 7.66 (t, J = 5.8 Hz, 1H, NH), 5.36(d, J = 4.7 Hz, 1H, OH-2), 4.53 (d, J = 2.2 Hz, 1H, OH-3), 4.49–4.41 (m, 2H, OH-4, OH alk), 4.39 (d, J = 7.1 Hz, 1H, OH-5), 4.32 (t, J = 5.3 Hz, 1H, OH-6), 3.97 (t, J = 3.7 Hz, 1H, H-2), 3.90 (d, J = 3.6 Hz, 1H, H-5), 3.63–3.53 (m, 1H, H-6), 3.47 (s, 2H, H-3, H-4), 3.43–3.35 (m, 3H, H-6′, -CH2-OH alk), 3.23–3.07 (m, 2H, CH2-N), 1.56 (p, J = 6.3 Hz, 2H, CH2-CH2-N). 13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 172.5 (C=O), 73.6 (C-2), 72.4 (C-3), 71.5 (C-4), 70.1 (C-5), 63.4 (C-6), 58.6 (-CH2-OH alk), 37.5 (CH2-N), 32.2 (-CH2-CH2-N). HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C9H19NO7Na [M + Na]+ 276.1059, found 276.1067. FT-IR ν (cm−1) 3404.4, 3348.4, 3240.4, 2976.1, 2947.2, 2897.1, 1651.1, 1539.2, 1249.9, 1114.9, 1072.4, 1024.2.
N-(2-thioethyl)-D-gluconamide 4k. Characterization data in accordance with the literature [43].
N-gluconylglycine methyl ester 4l. Characterization data in accordance with the literature [23].

3. Results and Discussion

The operating conditions were first optimized on the aminolysis of γ-galactonolactone 1 with dodecylamine 2a (Scheme 2) in a vibrational ball-mill, and compared to the conventional procedure conducted in MeOH and to manual grinding. The results are reported in Table 1.
All reactions were performed using stoechiometric amounts of free sugar lactone and amine. In the first study where the optimal conditions were sought, methanol, able to solubilize both unreacted galactonolactone and dodecylamine, but not the as-obtained galactonamide, was chosen to quench the reaction and ensure reliable results concerning the conversion. The latter was also checked using TLC analyses of the crude. After filtration and washing, N-dodecyl-galactonamide 1a was isolated as a white powder. NMR analyses (1H and 13C NMR) confirmed that neither residual lactone nor residual amine were present in the as-obtained crudes, N-dodecyl-galactonamide 1a being the only product observed.
Starting from 0.5 g of lactone 1 in the presence of one equivalent of dodecylamine 2a, a yield of 62 % for compound 1a was obtained after 30 min of stirring in MeOH (conventional conditions, entry 1). When the same reaction was performed in a ball mill (Spex 8000M) under less solvent conditions, a comparable yield (69%) was obtained for the same time (entry 2), with TLC analyses showing incomplete conversion. A reduction in milling time led to a drop in the production of amide (34% obtained after 10 min milling (entry 3)). However, when water was added as a liquid-assisted grinding agent (LAG), the yield raised to 86% for 10 min milling (entry 4), confirming the enhancement of conversion (confirmed by TLC measurement) which is well described for other transformations. In general, LAG improved reaction kinetics, allowed for the optimization of reactivity to quantitative yields and reduced the problems of product amorphization, which can be observed with neat grinding [44,45]. The parameter η is defined as the ratio of the added liquid (in μL) to the total weight of the solid reactants (in mg). To be considered as a LAG agent and not as a solvent, η must be lower than 2 μL mg−1. In our case, the η value was below 0.75 μL mg−1. The influence of milling time was also evaluated, but no significant change was observed between 5 and 15 min of milling (entries 5, 6). Finally, since ball mills are not available in every organic lab, we were interested in comparing this method with manual grinding, whilst considering that this technique is not as reliable as mechanical milling. By grinding the same quantities of reagents (equimolar ratio of galactonolactone with dodecylamine in the presence of water as a LAG agent) for 10 min in a mortar with a pestle, a high yield (83%) of N-dodecyl-galactonamide 1a was obtained, similarly to those obtained by mechanical milling, but without requiring any expensive equipment.
As illustrated by the results obtained with and without a LAG (Table 1, entry 3 vs. 4), a LAG agent is essential for the efficiency of this condensation reaction. Its nature and amount should influence the conversion and thus the isolated yield of N-dodecyl-galactonamide 1a. To evaluate these parameters, three different eco-friendly solvents, namely EtOAc, EtOH and H2O, were added in different quantities (from 0.25 mL to 0.75 mL) to the powder mixture before milling.
As reported in Table 2, when using EtOAc, compound 1a was obtained in a moderate 50% yield (entry 1), in accordance with the TLC analyses showing an incomplete conversion. In contrast, in the same conditions, protic solvents (H2O, EtOH) led to total conversions and high isolated yields (82 and 86%, respectively, entries 2 and 3). These results seem to suggest that the establishment of H-bounds with lactone may activate the electrophilic center. The adding of larger quantities of a LAG (0.5 or 0.75 mL, entries 4 and 5) does not allow for the enhancement of the isolated yield, for which a maximum of 86–87% was consistently obtained.
Furthermore, even in the presence of larger amounts of amine (1.05 and 1.1 eq), or by extending the milling time (such as for Table 1, entry 6), no more than 87% of N-dodecyl-galactonamide 1a was ever recovered, suggesting that the ~15% yield loss may occur during the workup (probably due to a slight solubilisation of 1a in methanol). This hypothesis corroborates the TLC analyses showing a total conversion of lactone. An aqueous workup (i.e., recovering of the white powder as a suspension in water followed by a filtration step) allowed for a slight enhancement of the isolated yield whilst reducing the environmental impact: 90% of N-dodecyl-galactonamide 1a was isolated after 5 min (Table 3, entry 1) of milling vs. 82% when methanol was used for washing. These last conditions of synthesis and workup were chosen as optimized conditions for the subsequent studies.
The development of a versatile methodology applicable to a wide variety of sugars is not easy in glycochemistry: a procedure, powerful on one series of sugar (i.e., glucose, for example), can lead to erratic results on other sugars (i.e., galactose, mannose and so on). On the other hand, the reactivity of an amine group is directly related to the radical which carries it. To illustrate the proposed methodology and identify its limitations, optimized conditions were applied to a variety of unprotected sugar lactones and amines (Figure 1).
Firstly, in addition to γ-galactonolactone 1, two commercially available aldonolactones (γ-ribonolactone 3 and δ-gluconolactone 4) were reacted with dodecylamine 2a (Table 3). Corresponding N-dodecyl-ribonamide 3a and N-dodecyl-gluconamide 4a were obtained, with high isolated yields (91% and 96% respectively) and excellent purities (>95% determined by NMR), showing that the procedure is not sugar-dependent (entries 2–3).
With the aim to prove the versatility of the procedure on the amines as well, a series of sundry amines (aliphatic, aromatic, unsaturated, functionalized with hydroxyl or thiol group, amino-acids, etc.) were then tested on δ-gluconolactone 4, this being more reactive, cheaper and abundant (Table 4). Conversion was determined based on 1H NMR, by comparison between the characteristic signals of the as-obtained amide and of the residual amine or lactone (or its saponified form) when present. All 1H and 13C NMR spectra are displayed in the Supplementary Materials.
Saturated and unsaturated aliphatic amines (2be) were used for the synthesis of the corresponding N-alkyl-aldonamides 4be. Good (84%) to total conversions (entry 3, Table 3 and entries 1–2, Table 4) were observed using saturated primary alkylamines (2a2c), even for volatile amines such as butylamine, for which milling may cause evaporation. On the other hand, the only secondary amine used in our conditions, pyrrolidine 2d, logically led to a weaker conversion (24%) because of its steric hindrance, leading to weaker nucleophilicity (entry 3). Nevertheless, this first attempt suggests that, after a new optimization step (by modulating time of milling, quantity of LAG, etc.), this solvent-less procedure may work with secondary amines.
Furthermore, unsaturated volatile amines, such as allylamine 2e and propargylamine 2f, gave good to excellent conversions (89% and quantitative, respectively, entries 4-5). Aromatic amines were also studied (entries 6–7). Because of the weak nucleophilicity of the amine group (due to the delocalization of the N nucleophilic lone pair into the aromatic moiety), aniline (2g) did not react. In contrast, benzylamine (2h) led to a good conversion of 89% (entry 7).
In order to study the versatility of the reaction, three functionalized amines (namely diaminobutane 2i, aminopropanol 2j and cysteamine 2k) were used (entries 8–10). Diaminobutane 2i showed excellent reactivity (quantitative conversion) but low selectivity, despite the use of one equivalent of diamine reagent: a mixture of mono- (4i) and di-amide (4i′) products was obtained (entry 8). When MeOH was used as a treatment at the end of the milling process, only the di-amide product 4i′ precipitated and was isolated by filtration, with a 39% yield and excellent purity. The reaction was also performed in the presence of 0.5 eq. of diaminobutane 2i, but a mixture of 4i/4i′ was again obtained, leading again to an uncomplete conversion. Furthermore, aminopropanol 2j showed a weaker reactivity (entry 9), since 80% of the conversion was obtained after 5 min milling. On the other hand, good selectivity was observed when using cysteamine (entry 10), since only the production of N-addition was observed. No residual lactone or amine was visualized by NMR, confirming a quantitative conversion. Nevertheless, the disulfide product was detected in the mixture, due to the oxidation of the thiol-free group. A comparison of crude NMR spectra (especially 13C) with the literature [43] with mass spectrometry allows for the confirmation that N-(2-thioethyl)-d-gluconamide 4k was the major product in the crude (~80% determined by NMR).
To complete this work, a protected amino-acid, l-glycine methyl ester 2l, was used to show the possibility of rapidly and efficiently synthesizing other glycoconjugates, such as glyco-aminoacids, glycopeptids or glycoproteins (Scheme 3). Indeed, for more than 20 years, the glycoscientist community has been interested in this type of glycoconjugates (sugar/amino-acids, peptids and proteins), for the understanding of biological phenomena or the design of new drugs, for instance [46,47,48]. Since l-glycine methyl ester 2l is commercially available as hydrochloride salt, the addition of a base is needed to release the free amine. Therefore, one equivalent of NaHCO3 was first milled with amino-ester hydrochloride 2l for 5 min, then δ-gluconolactone 4 (0.5 g) and LAG (H2O, 0.25 mL) were added to the jar. The aminolysis step was performed as for the other amines. The preliminary step of alkalinisation is essential for the reactivity of the amine, which is also hazardous: in the second step (the aminolysis of the lactone) the presence of the residual base and water (used as a LAG, but also during the work-up) may cause saponification of the lactone into carboxylate salt, which is unable to react with amine. Consequently, even if the gluconolactone was totally converted, a mixture gluconamide 4l/gluconate salt 4l′ was obtained (in proportion ~2/1). Two hypotheses can be drawn to explain this degradation: (1) the saponification may take place during the aminolysis when residual base and water (used as a LAG) are present, meaning that the nature and quantity of the base as well as LAG should be optimized, or that the free amine derivative should be isolated prior to aminolysis, or (2) that the conversion is not quantitative and the residual gluconolactone is saponified during the work-up; in this case, an optimization of the aminolysis step in terms of progress of the reaction (milling time, nature of the ball mill, etc.) should be carried out. Nevertheless, this first attempt suggested that the synthesis of such glycoconjugates can be performed by using this simple procedure after optimization. This is under study and will be the subject of a future article.

4. Conclusions

To conclude, we presented herein a fast and simple procedure to obtain a variety of glycoconjugates by the mechanical-assisted aminolysis of sugar lactones using a vibrational ball mill. This methodology is performed on unprotected lactones and is totally free of organic solvents, making it an excellent eco-friendly alternative to conventional procedures for the synthesis of such glycoconjugates. No purification step is needed, avoiding the use of excess solvents. Only a minimum of H2O as a “liquid-assisted grinding” agent (LAG) is used to activate the reaction, resulting in the corresponding glycoconjugates in less than 5 min. Moreover, it can also be performed in a mortar, which has the advantage of being available in any laboratory. The reaction conditions were first optimized by using dodecylamine and galactonolactone as starting substrates, and the optimal conditions were then applied to a wide variety of substrates (lactones and amines). Gluco-, ribono- and galactonolactone exhibited excellent similar reactivity, showing that the procedure is not sugar-dependent, which is often a lock in glycochemistry. Overall, unfunctionalized primary amines also led to excellent conversions, except for deactivated ones such as aniline. By using pyrrolidine, the proof of concept was also established for secondary amines, which need further optimization to give quantitative conversion. The procedure is compatible with various functional groups, such as alkene, alkyne, thiol, ester, or hydroxyl. Finally, it has been shown that glycoconjugates such as sugar/amino-acid derivatives should be easily obtained (further optimization concerning the nature and quantity of base, milling time, apparatus is currently ongoing), which paves the way to the synthesis of more complex glycoconjugates.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/suschem3030019/s1, 1H and 13C NMR spectra of the 1a, 3a, 4a, 4c-4h, 4k-l crudes and characterization (1H, 13C, COSY, HSQC NMR analyses, HRMS and FTIR spectra) of the 4b, 4i′ and 4j crudes. Figure S1: 1H NMR spectrum of 1a crude; Figure S2: 13C NMR spectrum of 1a crude; Figure S3: 1H NMR spectrum of 3a crude; Figure S4: 13C NMR spectrum of 3a crude; Figure S5: 1H NMR spectrum of 4a crude; Figure S6: 13C NMR spectrum of 4a crude; Figure S7: 1H NMR spectrum of 4b crude; Figure S8: 13C NMR spectrum of 4b crude; Figure S9: COSY NMR 2D spectrum of 4b crude; Figure S10: HSQC 13C-1H NMR 2D spectrum of 4b crude; Figure S11: HRMS analysis of 4b crude; Figure S12: IR analysis of 4b crude; Figure S13: 1H NMR spectrum of 4c crude; Figure S14: 13C spectrum of 4c crude; Figure S15: 1H NMR spectrum of 4d crude; Figure S16: 13C NMR spectrum of 4d crude; Figure S17: 1H NMR spectrum of 4e crude; Figure S18: 13C NMR spectrum of 4e crude; Figure S19: 1H NMR spectrum of 4f crude; Figure S20: 13C NMR spectrum of 4f crude; Figure S21: 1H NMR spectrum of 4h crude; Figure S22: 13C NMR spectrum of 4h crude; Figure S23: 1H NMR spectrum of 4i′ crude; Figure S24: 13C NMR spectrum of 4i′ crude; Figure S25: COSY NMR 2D spectrum of 4i′ crude; Figure S26: HSQC 13C-1H NMR 2D spectrum of 4i′ crude; Figure S27: HRMS analysis of 4i′ crude; Figure S28: IR analysis of 4i′ crude; Figure S29: 1H NMR spectrum of 4j crude; Figure S30: 13C NMR spectrum of 4j crude; Figure S31: COSY NMR 2D spectrum of 4j crude; Figure S32: HSQC 13C-1H NMR 2D spectrum of 4j crude; Figure S33: HRMS analysis of 4j crude; Figure S34: IR analysis of 4j crude; Figure S35: 1H NMR spectrum of 4k crude; Figure S36: 13C NMR spectrum of 4k crude; Figure S37: 1H NMR spectrum of 4l crude; Figure S38: 13C NMR spectrum of 4l crude.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.P. and A.W.; Data curation, G.P.; Formal analysis, G.P.; Funding acquisition, A.W.; Investigation, A.B. and B.A.; Methodology, G.P. and A.W.; Project administration, A.W.; Supervision, G.P. and A.W.; Validation, G.P.; Visualization, G.P.; Writing—original draft, G.P.; Writing—review & editing, G.P. and A.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the French Government, as part of the Investments for the Future, under the reference ANR-001-01.This work was performed, in partnership with the SAS PIVERT, within the frame of the French Institute for the Energy Transition (Institut pour la Transition Energétique (ITE) P.I.V.E.R.T. (www.institut-pivert.com) selected as an Investment for the Future (“Investissements d’Avenir”).

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Gallezot, P. Conversion of biomass to selected chemical products. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 1538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Ruiz, C.C. Sugar-Based Surfactants: Fundamentals and Applications; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2008; pp. 245–306. [Google Scholar]
  3. Kahn, G.F. Hair Compositions, Comprising a Glucose-Based Hair Conditioning Agent and an Unsaturated Cationic Surfactant. HENKEL AG & CO. Patent KGAA—DE102020206655, 2 December 2021. [Google Scholar]
  4. Zielińska, K.; Wilk, K.A.; Jezierski, A.; Jesionowski, T. Microstructure and structural transition in microemulsions stabilized by aldonamide-type surfactants. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2008, 321, 408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Zielińska, K.; Pietkiewicz, J.; Saczko, J.; Wilk, K.A. Microemulsion stabilized by gemini, dicephalic and single-head single tail sugar surfactants as biologically important systems: Hemolytic activity and cytotoxic studies. Prog. Colloid Polym. Sci. 2011, 138, 193. [Google Scholar]
  6. Ohsedo, Y.; Oono, M.; Saruhashi, K.; Watanabe, H. Onset of mixing-induced thixotropy in hydrogels by mixing two homologues of low-molecular-weight hydrogelators. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 43560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Pilakowska-Pietras, D.; Lunkenheimer, K.; Piasecki, A. Investigations on foamability of surface-chemically pure aqueous solutions of functionalized alkylaldonamides. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2006, 294, 423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Piasecki, A.; Pilakowska-Pietras, D. Synthesis and properties of functionalized alkylaldonamides. J. Surfactants Deterg. 2007, 10, 125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Capicciotti, C.J.; Leclère, M.; Perras, F.A.; Bryce, D.L.; Paulin, H.; Harden, J.; Liu, Y.; Ben, R.N. Potent inhibition of ice recrystallization by low molecular weight carbohydrate-based surfactants and hydrogelators. Chem. Sci. 2012, 3, 1408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Briard, J.G.; Jahan, S.; Chandran, P.; Allan, D.; Pineault, N.; Ben, R.N. Small-molecule ice recrystallization inhibitors improve the post-thaw function of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. ACS Omega 2016, 1, 1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Wilk, K.A.; Syper, L.; Domagalska, B.W.; Komorek, U.; Maliszewska, I.; Gancarz, R. Aldonamide-type gemini surfactants: Synthesis, structural analysis, and biological properties. J. Surfactants Deterg. 2002, 5, 235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Reis, R.C.N.; Oda, S.C.; De Almeida, M.V.; Lourenço, M.C.S.; Vicente, F.R.C.; Barbosa, N.R.; Trevizani, R.; Santos, P.L.C.; Le Hyaric, M. Synthesis and antimicrobial activity of amphiphilic carbohydrate derivatives. J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 2008, 19, 1065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Acharya, G.; Park, K.; Thompson, D.H. Synthesis and evaluation of α-cyclodextrin-aldonamide conjugates for D-glucose recognition. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 2006, 16, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Adokoh, C.K.; Quan, S.; Hitt, M.; Darkwa, J.; Kumar, P.; Narain, R. Synthesis and evaluation of glycopolymeric decorated gold nanoparticles functionalized with gold-triphenyl phosphine as anti-cancer agents. Biomacromolecules 2014, 15, 3802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Aoyama, Y. Macrocyclic glycoclusters: From amphiphiles through nanoparticles to glycoviruses. Chem. Eur. J. 2004, 10, 588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Abe, H.; Kenmoku, A.; Yamaguch, N.; Hattori, K. Structural effects of oligosaccharide-branched cyclodextrins on the dual recognition toward lectin and drug. J. Incl. Phenom. Macrocycl. Chem. 2002, 44, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lönngren, J.; Goldstein, I.I.; Niederhuber, J.E. Aldonate coupling, a simple procedure for the preparation of carbohydrate-protein conjugates for studies of carbohydrate-binding proteins. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1976, 175, 661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Lu, B.; Vayssade, M.; Miao, Y.; Chagnault, V.; Grand, E.; Wadouachi, A.; Postel, D.; Drelich, A.; Egles, C.; Pezron, I. Physico-chemical properties and cytotoxic effects of sugar-based surfactants: Impact of structural variations. Colloids Surf. B 2016, 145, 79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Bois, R.; Abdellahi, B.; Mika, B.; Golonu, S.; Vigneron, P.; Chagnault, V.; Drelich, A.; Pourceau, G.; Wadouachi, A.; Vayssade, M.; et al. Physicochemical, foaming and biological properties of lowly irritant anionic sugar-based surfactants. Colloid Surf. A 2020, 607, 125525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Abdellahi, B.; Bois, R.; Golonu, S.; Pourceau, G.; Lesur, D.; Chagnault, V.; Drelich, A.; Pezron, I.; Nesterenko, A.; Wadouachi, A. Synthesis and interfacial properties of new 6-sulfate sugar-based anionic surfactants. Tetrahedron Lett. 2021, 74, 153113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Colombeau, L.; Traoré, T.; Compain, P.; Martin, O.R. Metal-free one-pot oxidative amidation of aldoses with functionalized amines. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 8647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Fusaro, M.; Chagnault, V.; Postel, D. Synthesis of glycosylamines and glyconamides using molecular iodine. Tetrahedron 2013, 69, 542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Cho, C.C.; Liu, J.N.; Chien, C.H.; Shie, J.J.; Chen, Y.C.; Fang, J.M. Direct amidation of aldoses and decarboxylative amidation of α-keto acids: An efficient conjugation method for unprotected carbohydrate molecules. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 1549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Reis, M.I.P.; Gonçalves, A.D.; da Silva, F.C.; Jordão, A.K.; Alves, R.J.; de Andrade, S.F.; Resende, J.A.L.C.; Rocha, A.A.; Ferreira, V.F. Synthesis and evaluation of D-gluconamides as green mineral scales. Carbohydr. Res. 2012, 353, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Li, D.; Wu, J.; Yang, S.; Zhang, W.; Niu, X.; Chen, Y.; Ran, F. Hydrophilicity and anti-fouling performance of polyethersulfone membrane modified by grafting block glycosyl copolymers via surface initiated electrochemically mediated atom transfer radical polymerization. New J. Chem. 2018, 42, 2692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Cerrada, M.L.; Sánchez-Chaves, M.; Ruiz, C.; Fernández-García, M. Recognition abilities and development of heat-induced entangled networks in lactone-derived glycopolymers obtained from ethylene-vinyl alcohol copolymers. Biomacromolecules 2009, 10, 1828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wang, G.-W. Mechanochemical organic synthesis. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 7668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Rightmire, N.R.; Hanusa, T.P. Advances in organometallic synthesis with mechanochemical methods. Dalton Trans. 2016, 45, 2352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Howard, J.L.; Cao, Q.; Browne, D.L. Mechanochemistry as an emerging tool for molecular synthesis: What can it offer? Chem. Sci. 2018, 9, 3080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Tan, D.; Friščić, T. Mechanochemistry for Organic Chemists: An Update. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2018, 2018, 18–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Avila-Ortiz, C.G.; Juaristi Egorov, E. Novel Methodologies for Chemical Activation in Organic Synthesis under Solvent-Free Reaction Conditions. Molecules 2020, 25, 3579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Egorov, I.N.; Santra, S.; Kopchuk, D.S.; Kovalev, I.S.; Zyryanov, G.V.; Majee, A.; Ranu, B.C.; Rusinov, V.L.; Chupakhin, O.N. Ball milling: An efficient and green approach for asymmetric organic syntheses. Green Chem. 2020, 22, 302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ardila-Fierro, K.J.; Hernández, J.G. Sustainability Assessment of Mechanochemistry by Using the Twelve Principles of Green Chemistry. ChemSusChem 2021, 14, 2145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Yang, X.; Wu, C.; Su, W.; Yu, J. Mechanochemical C−X/C−H Functionalization: An Alternative Strategic Access to Pharmaceuticals. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2022, 2022, e202101440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Bento, O.; Luttringer, F.; Mohy El Dine, T.; Pétry, N.; Bantreil, X.; Lamaty, F. Sustainable Mechanosynthesis of Biologically Active Molecules. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2022, 2022, e202101516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Lingome, C.E.; Pourceau, G.; Gobert-Deveaux, V.; Wadouachi, A. Efficient synthesis of glycosylamines in solventless conditions promoted by mechanical milling. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 36350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Epoune Lingome, C.; Wadouachi, A.; Pourceau, G.; Beury, A.; Gobert-Deveaux, V. Novel Method for Synthesising n-alkyl-glycosyl(di)amine Derivatives and Uses of Same against Phytopathogens. PCT International Application WO 2014195828 A1, 11 December 2014. [Google Scholar]
  38. Nicholson, W.I.; Barreteau, F.; Leitch, J.A.; Payne, R.; Priestley, I.; Godineau, E.; Battilocchio, C.; Browne, D.L. Direct amidation of esters in ball milling. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 21868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Frankel, D.A.; O’Brien, D.F. Supramolecular Assemblies of Diacetylenic Aldonamides. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 10057. [Google Scholar]
  40. Falentin-Daudre, C.; Beaupère, D.; Stasik-Boutbaiba, I. Synthesis of new N-substituted 3,4,5-trihydroxypiperidin-2-ones from d-ribono-1,4-lactone. Carbohydr. Res. 2010, 345, 1983–1987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zhi, L.; Li, J.; Li, X.; Chen, Y.; Song, Y.; Yu, J.; Zhang, Q. Enhancing water solubility of N-dodecyl-D-gluconamide surfactant using borax. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2019, 725, 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ryu, E.-H.; Zhao, Y. Efficient synthesis of water-soluble calixarenes using click chemistry. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 1035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Adokoh, C.K.; Obuah, C.; Kinfe, H.H.; Zinyemba, O.; Darkwa, J. Novel bio-friendly and non-toxic thiocarbohydrate stabilizers of gold nanoparticles. New J. Chem. 2015, 39, 5249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Friščić, T.; Childs, S.L.; Rizvi, S.A.; Jones, W. The role of solvent in mechanochemical and sonochemical cocrystal formation: A solubility-based approach for predicting cocrystallisation outcome. CrystEngComm 2009, 11, 418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ying, P.; Yu, J.; Su, W. Liquid-Assisted Grinding Mechanochemistry in the Synthesis of Pharmaceuticals. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2021, 363, 1246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Pratt, M.R.; Bertozzi, C.R. Synthetic glycopeptides and glycoproteins as tools for biology. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2005, 34, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Davis, B.G. Synthesis of glycoproteins. Chem. Rev. 2002, 102, 579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Grogan, M.J.; Pratt, M.R.; Marcaurelle, L.A.; Bertozzi, C.R. Homogeneous Glycopeptides and Glycoproteins for Biological Investigation. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2002, 71, 593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Scheme 1. General procedure for the mechanosynthesis of aldonamides proposed in this work.
Scheme 1. General procedure for the mechanosynthesis of aldonamides proposed in this work.
Suschem 03 00019 sch001
Scheme 2. Optimized synthesis of N-dodecyl-galactonamide 1a.
Scheme 2. Optimized synthesis of N-dodecyl-galactonamide 1a.
Suschem 03 00019 sch002
Figure 1. Glyconolactones (1,3,4) and amines (2a2m) used in this study.
Figure 1. Glyconolactones (1,3,4) and amines (2a2m) used in this study.
Suschem 03 00019 g001
Scheme 3. Mechanosynthesis of N-gluconylglycine methyl ester 4l.
Scheme 3. Mechanosynthesis of N-gluconylglycine methyl ester 4l.
Suschem 03 00019 sch003
Table 1. Comparative conditions for the synthesis of N-dodecyl-d-galactonamide 1a.
Table 1. Comparative conditions for the synthesis of N-dodecyl-d-galactonamide 1a.
EntryConditionsLAG bt (min)Isolated Yield (%)
1MeOH a-3062
2SPEX ball mill-3069
3-1034
4H2O1086
5H2O584
6H2O1583
7MortarH2O1083
Reaction conditions: γ-galactonolactone (2.8 mmol), dodecylamine (2.8 mmol). a 10 mL of MeOH. b 0.75 mL.
Table 2. Influence of nature and quantity of LAG for the mechanosynthesis of 1a in the SPEX ball-miller.
Table 2. Influence of nature and quantity of LAG for the mechanosynthesis of 1a in the SPEX ball-miller.
EntryLAGV (mL)Yield (%)
1EtOAc0.2550
2H2O82
3EtOH86
4EtOH0.5083
50.7584
Reaction conditions: γ-galactonolactone (2.8 mmol), dodecylamine (2.8 mmol), LAG agent, milled during 10 min.
Table 3. Applications to various sugar lactones a.
Table 3. Applications to various sugar lactones a.
EntrySugar LactoneProductIsolated Yield (%)
1 Suschem 03 00019 i001 Suschem 03 00019 i00290
2 Suschem 03 00019 i003 Suschem 03 00019 i00491
3 Suschem 03 00019 i005 Suschem 03 00019 i00696
a 0.5 g lactone, 1 eq. dodecylamine 2a, 0.25 mL H2O (LAG), 5 min milling, aqueous treatment.
Table 4. Applications to various amines a.
Table 4. Applications to various amines a.
EntryAminesProductConv. (%)
1 Suschem 03 00019 i007 Suschem 03 00019 i008Quant.
2 Suschem 03 00019 i009 Suschem 03 00019 i01084
3 Suschem 03 00019 i011 Suschem 03 00019 i01224
4 Suschem 03 00019 i013 Suschem 03 00019 i01489
5 Suschem 03 00019 i015 Suschem 03 00019 i016Quant.
6 Suschem 03 00019 i017 Suschem 03 00019 i018-
7 Suschem 03 00019 i019 Suschem 03 00019 i02089
8 Suschem 03 00019 i021Mixture of
Suschem 03 00019 i022
Suschem 03 00019 i023
Quant. b Isolated yield of 4i′: 39
9 Suschem 03 00019 i024 Suschem 03 00019 i02580
10 Suschem 03 00019 i026 Suschem 03 00019 i027
Suschem 03 00019 i028
Quant. 4k/4k′: ~80/20
a 0.5 g gluconolactone 4, 1 eq. amine, 0.25 mL H2O (LAG), 5 min milling, aqueous treatment; b: washing with MeOH.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bil, A.; Abdellahi, B.; Pourceau, G.; Wadouachi, A. Fast and Efficient Mechanosynthesis of Aldonamides by Aminolysis of Unprotected Sugar Lactones. Sustain. Chem. 2022, 3, 300-311. https://doi.org/10.3390/suschem3030019

AMA Style

Bil A, Abdellahi B, Pourceau G, Wadouachi A. Fast and Efficient Mechanosynthesis of Aldonamides by Aminolysis of Unprotected Sugar Lactones. Sustainable Chemistry. 2022; 3(3):300-311. https://doi.org/10.3390/suschem3030019

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bil, Abed, Bemba Abdellahi, Gwladys Pourceau, and Anne Wadouachi. 2022. "Fast and Efficient Mechanosynthesis of Aldonamides by Aminolysis of Unprotected Sugar Lactones" Sustainable Chemistry 3, no. 3: 300-311. https://doi.org/10.3390/suschem3030019

APA Style

Bil, A., Abdellahi, B., Pourceau, G., & Wadouachi, A. (2022). Fast and Efficient Mechanosynthesis of Aldonamides by Aminolysis of Unprotected Sugar Lactones. Sustainable Chemistry, 3(3), 300-311. https://doi.org/10.3390/suschem3030019

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop