Next Article in Journal
Comparative Analysis of the Six-Strand Hamstring and Peroneus Longus in Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation
Previous Article in Journal
Brain Tumor Reporting and Data System (BT-RADS) for the Surveillance of Adult-Type Diffuse Gliomas after Surgery
Previous Article in Special Issue
Mechanisms of Degradation of Collagen or Gelatin Materials (Hemostatic Sponges) in Oral Surgery: A Systematic Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Balancing Innovation and Proven Techniques in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

by
Karolina Walczyńska-Dragon
1 and
Maciej Chęciński
2,*
1
Department of Temporomandibular Disorders, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, Traugutta Sq. 2, 41-800 Zabrze, Poland
2
Department of Oral Surgery, Preventive Medicine Center, Komorowskiego 12, 30-106 Kraków, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Surgeries 2024, 5(3), 774-777; https://doi.org/10.3390/surgeries5030062
Submission received: 28 August 2024 / Revised: 29 August 2024 / Accepted: 3 September 2024 / Published: 5 September 2024

1. Introduction

The field of oral and maxillofacial surgery is continuously evolving, with ongoing advancements in surgical techniques, materials, and pharmacological approaches that enhance patient outcomes [1,2,3,4]. This Special Issue of Surgeries, titled “Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: Balance Between Innovative and Proven Procedures, Drugs, and Materials”, brings together a collection of systematic reviews and primary research that highlight the importance of balancing innovative practices with established methods [5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12]. The articles featured in this Special Issue reflect the diverse and dynamic nature of the field, providing insights that are crucial for both clinical and academic advancements [5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12].

2. Highlights

2.1. Material Science in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Material science plays a pivotal role in surgical success, especially where the degradation of biomaterials can significantly impact clinical outcomes [13,14,15,16]. In their systematic review “Mechanisms of Degradation of Collagen or Gelatin Materials (Hemostatic Sponges) in Oral Surgery”, Catarino et al. offer a comprehensive analysis of the enzymatic degradation mechanisms affecting these materials [5]. Their work highlights the need for standardized protocols in laboratory evaluations to better understand and predict material behavior in clinical settings [5].
Another critical aspect of surgical practice is the choice of suture materials, which can influence both healing outcomes and patient comfort [17,18,19,20]. The systematic review “Evaluating and Comparing the Tensile Strength and Clinical Behavior of Monofilament Polyamide and Multifilament Silk Sutures” by de Oliveira et al. provides valuable insights into the mechanical and clinical properties of these sutures [6]. Their findings reveal that while monofilament polyamide sutures cause a less inflammatory reaction, multifilament silk sutures offer superior mechanical characteristics [6]. This research advocates for a tailored approach to suture selection, aligning material properties with specific clinical needs to achieve the best patient outcomes [6].

2.2. Clinical Management with Innovative and Established Techniques

The impact of pharmacological agents on surgical outcomes is another theme currently being explored [21,22,23,24]. In this Special Issue, Jones et al. examine “The Effect of Antihypertensive Agents on Dental Implant Stability, Osseointegration, and Survival Outcomes” [7], and their systematic review presents compelling evidence of how certain antihypertensive agents may enhance bone density and implant stability, though more research is needed to fully understand their effects on osseointegration [7]. The study in question is a testament to the intricate interplay between pharmacology and surgical practice, highlighting the potential of medications to influence surgical success [7].
In the context of reconstructive surgery, particularly for conditions such as lip carcinoma, the study “Surgical Lip Cancer Reconstruction in the COVID-19 Era: Are Free Flaps or Loco-Regional Flaps Better?” by Staglianò et al. discusses reconstructive options during the challenging COVID-19 era [8]. The importance of choosing between free and loco-regional flaps based on available resources, patient needs, and esthetic outcomes is currently a widely discussed issue [8,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32]. The report by Staglianò et al. is an example of adapting innovative surgical techniques to suit the constraints imposed by a global health crisis, ultimately advocating for loco-regional flaps as a viable and effective option in the reconstruction of lip defects, balancing esthetic and functional outcomes [8].

2.3. Multidisciplinary Care, with Surgery Predominating

The importance of multidisciplinary approaches in improving patient care is another current concern [33,34,35,36,37,38,39]. The contribution titled “Guided Biopsy of a Radiopaque Lesion Simultaneous with Dental Implants’ Placement” by Parise et al. discusses the benefits of using new technologies and techniques in dental surgery, particularly guided surgery, which is often flapless and facilitates immediate prosthetic loading [9]. This approach reduces bleeding risks, lowers surgical risks, and is less invasive [9].
Scarano et al.‘s report on “Dermal Cosmetic Migration after Lip Augmentation Procedure” provides a unique perspective on managing complications from cosmetic procedures, combining clinical expertise with histological analysis [10]. The report details the case of a 34-year-old woman who experienced cheek swelling after a hyaluronic acid filler from a lip augmentation migrated, necessitating surgical removal and a histological analysis [10].
Similarly, Jordan et al.’s case report on “Nasal Floor Elevation—An Option of Premaxilla Augmentation” illustrates the potential of novel augmentation techniques in addressing severe maxillary atrophy, expanding the arsenal of surgical options available to practitioners [11]. The case report demonstrates that nasal floor elevation is a viable technique for augmenting the atrophic anterior maxilla, allowing the successful placement of implants and a bar-retained overdenture in a 75-year-old woman [11].
Finally, the report “Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Mandible Treated with Marginal Resection” by Chęciński et al. covers the successful treatment of a 70-year-old patient [12]. Following diagnosis, antibiotics and anticoagulants were administered, and a mandible resection was performed, with no recurrence after 3 years [12], thus underscoring the effectiveness of a well-selected resection range in severe medicine-related osteonecrosis of the jaw [12,40,41].

3. Concluding Thoughts

In conclusion, this Special Issue provides a rich tapestry of knowledge that spans innovative surgical techniques, material science, pharmacological impacts, and multidisciplinary approaches. The included research advances our understanding of oral and maxillofacial surgery and emphasizes the importance of a balanced approach in clinical practice. As the field evolves, researchers and clinicians must integrate these insights to enhance patient care and optimize surgical outcomes.
Through this Special Issue, the Editors aim to stimulate further research and discussion, fostering advancements that bridge the gap between novel and established surgeries.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.W.-D. and M.C.; writing—original draft preparation, K.W.-D.; writing—review and editing, M.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Vered, M.; Wright, J.M. Update from the 5th Edition of the World Health Organization Classification of Head and Neck Tumors: Odontogenic and Maxillofacial Bone Tumours. Head Neck Pathol. 2022, 16, 63–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Ruggiero, S.L.; Dodson, T.B.; Aghaloo, T.; Carlson, E.R.; Ward, B.B.; Kademani, D. American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons’ Position Paper on Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaws—2022 Update. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2022, 80, 920–943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Halpern, L.R.; Gammal, P.; Adams, D.R. An Update on Diagnosis and Pharmacologic Therapy for Headache in the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Practice. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. Clin. N. Am. 2022, 34, 83–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Caruso, S.R.; Yamaguchi, E.; Portnof, J.E. Update on Antimicrobial Therapy in Management of Acute Odontogenic Infection in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. Clin. N. Am. 2022, 34, 169–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Catarino, M.; Castro, F.; Macedo, J.P.; Lopes, O.; Pereira, J.; Lopes, P.; Fernandes, G.V.O. Mechanisms of Degradation of Collagen or Gelatin Materials (Hemostatic Sponges) in Oral Surgery: A Systematic Review. Surgeries 2024, 5, 532–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Alves de Oliveira, M.; Arcanjo, A.; Castro, F.; Fernandes, J.C.H.; Fernandes, G.V.O. Evaluating and Comparing the Tensile Strength and Clinical Behavior of Monofilament Polyamide and Multifilament Silk Sutures: A Systematic Review. Surgeries 2024, 5, 350–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Jones, D.; Khan, R.S.; Thompson, J.D.; Ucer, C.; Wright, S. The Effect of Antihypertensive Agents on Dental Implant Stability, Osseointegration and Survival Outcomes: A Systematic Review. Surgeries 2024, 5, 297–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Staglianò, S.; Tartaro, G.; Boschetti, C.E.; Guida, D.; Colella, G.; Rauso, R. Surgical Lip Cancer Reconstruction in the COVID-19 Era: Are Free Flaps or Loco-Regional Flaps Better? Surgeries 2023, 4, 108–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Parise, D.; Sartorato, F.; Fabris, E.; Scarpa, A.; Baesso, T.; Sbricoli, L.; Abdelwahab, O.; Fedrigo, M.; Bacci, C. Guided Biopsy of a Radiopaque Lesion Simultaneous with Dental Implants’ Placement: A Multidisciplinary Approach. Surgeries 2022, 3, 297–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Scarano, A.; Inchingolo, F.; Di Carmine, M.; Marchetti, M.; Lorusso, F.; Amore, R.; Amuso, D. Dermal Cosmetic Migration after Lip Augmentation Procedure: Clinical Management and Histological Analysis in a Case Report with Review of the Literature. Surgeries 2023, 4, 223–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Jordan, A.; Vuletić, M.; Sušić, M.; Stojić, L.; Gabrić, D. Nasal Floor Elevation—An Option of Premaxilla Augmentation: A Case Report. Surgeries 2022, 3, 306–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Chęciński, M.; Wróbel, K.; Sikora, M. Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Mandible Treated with Marginal Resection: A Case Report. Surgeries 2022, 3, 142–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wong, M.; Vasani, S.; Breik, O.; Zhang, X.; Kenny, L.; Punyadeera, C. The potential of hydrogel-free tumoroids in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Med. 2024, 13, e70129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Wang, X.; Mu, M.; Yan, J.; Han, B.; Ye, R.; Guo, G. 3D printing materials and 3D printed surgical devices in oral and maxillofacial surgery: Design, workflow and effectiveness. Regen. Biomater. 2024, 11, rbae066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Chęcińska, K.; Chęciński, M.; Sikora, M.; Nowak, Z.; Karwan, S.; Chlubek, D. The Effect of Zirconium Dioxide (ZrO2) Nanoparticles Addition on the Mechanical Parameters of Polymethyl Methacrylate (PMMA): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Experimental Studies. Polymers 2022, 14, 1047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Sun, H.D.; Yin, X.D.; Yang, C.; Kuang, H.D.; Luo, W.D. Advances in autogenous dentin matrix graft as a promising biomaterial for guided bone regeneration in maxillofacial region: A review. Medicine 2024, 103, e39422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Egbunah, U.P.; Adamson, O.; Fashina, A.; Adekunle, A.A.; James, O.; Adeyemo, W.L. Comparing the Treatment Outcomes of Absorbable Sutures, Nonabsorbable Sutures, and Tissue Adhesives in Cleft Lip Repair: A Systematic Review. Cleft Palate-Craniofac. J. 2022, 59, 110–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Gonçalves, M.W.A.; Souza, M.R.F.; Becheleni, M.T.; Galvão, E.L.; Al-Moraissi, E.A.; Falci, S.G.M. Does cyanoacrylate have the best postoperative outcomes after third molar extractions when compared to conventional sutures? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Heliyon 2024, 10, e23058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Mahardawi, B.; Jiaranuchart, S.; Rochanavibhata, S.; Siriwat, K.; Mattheos, N.; Pimkhaokham, A. Cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive versus silk sutures for mandibular third molar surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin. Oral Investig. 2024, 28, 180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Scribante, A.; Ghizzoni, M.; Pellegrini, M.; Poli, P.P.; Maiorana, C.; Spadari, F. Microbiological and Clinical Assessments of Suture Materials and Cyanoacrylate Application in Impacted Third Molar Surgeries: A Scoping Review. J. Funct. Biomater. 2023, 14, 529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Dammling, C.; Abramowicz, S.; Kinard, B. Current Concepts in Prophylactic Antibiotics in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. Clin. N. Am. 2022, 34, 157–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Mahmood, H.; Siddique, I.; McKechnie, A. Antiplatelet drugs: A review of pharmacology and the perioperative management of patients in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl. 2020, 102, 9–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Rosenfeld, J.; Dym, H. Emergency Drugs for the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeon Office. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. Clin. N. Am. 2022, 34, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Turosz, N.; Chęcińska, K.; Chęciński, M.; Kamińska, M.; Nowak, Z.; Sikora, M.; Chlubek, D. A Scoping Review of the Use of Pioglitazone in the Treatment of Temporo-Mandibular Joint Arthritis. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 16518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Dowgierd, K.; Pokrowiecki, R.; Wolanski, W.; Kawlewska, E.; Kozakiewicz, M.; Wos, J.; Dowgierd, M.; Krakowczyk, Ł. Analysis of the effects of mandibular reconstruction based on microvascular free flaps after oncological resections in 21 patients, using 3D planning, surgical templates and individual implants. Oral Oncol. 2022, 127, 105800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Thoenissen, P.; Najafi, R.; Sader, R.; Ghanaati, S. Volume reduction of vascularized flaps in the field of cranio-maxillofacial surgery: A narrative-style review. J. Cranio-Maxillofac. Surg. 2024, 52, 203–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Dowgierd, K.; Pokrowiecki, R.; Myśliwiec, A.; Krakowczyk, Ł. Use of a Fibula Free Flap for Mandibular Reconstruction in Severe Craniofacial Microsomia in Children with Obstructive Sleep Apnea. J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 1124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Li, P.; Zhang, S.; Liu, J.; Xu, Y.; Wu, H.; Gong, Z. Chimeric Anterolateral Thigh and Rectus Femoris Flaps for Reconstruction of Complex Oral and Maxillofacial Defects. J. Craniofac. Surg. 2021, 32, 1841–1844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Krakowczyk, D.; Opyrchał, J.; Koszutski, T.; Dowgierd, K.; Krakowczyk, Ł. Reconstructive Options for Pressure Ulcers in Pediatric Patients. Children 2024, 11, 691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Cho, A.M.; Lopez, J.; Teven, C.M.; Pourtaheri, N.; Do, N.T.; Jazayeri, H.E.; Steinbacher, D.M.; Blackwell, K.E.; Ozaki, W.; Jason, W.Y. Outcomes in Pediatric Maxillofacial Reconstruction with Vascularized Fibular Flaps: A Systematic Review. J. Craniofac. Surg. 2022, 33, 1346–1351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Opyrchał, J.; Bula, D.; Dowgierd, K.; Pachuta, B.; Krakowczyk, D.; Raciborska, A.; Krakowczyk, Ł. Case Series: Fibula Free Flap with Bone Allograft as the Gold Standard in Lower Limb-Salvage Surgery for Adolescent Patients with Primary Bone Tumors Located within Tibial Diaphysis: Technical Modifications and Short-Term Follow-Up. J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13, 4217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Frohwitter, G.; Lutz, R.; Baran, C.; Weber, M.; Nobis, C.P.; Rau, A.; Kesting, M. Consistent Value of Two-Stage Pedicle Flaps in the Age of Microsurgical Maxillofacial Reconstruction. J. Maxillofac. Oral Surg. 2023, 22 (Suppl. S1), 98–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Lin, J.; Wang, C.; Wang, X.; Chen, F.; Zhang, W.; Sun, H.; Yan, F.; Pan, Y.; Zhu, D.; Yang, Q.; et al. Expert consensus on odontogenic maxillary sinusitis multi-disciplinary treatment. Int. J. Oral Sci. 2024, 16, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Tel, A.; Miotti, G.; Ius, T.; de Marco, L.; Robiony, M.; Parodi, P.C.; Panciani, P.P.; Zeppieri, M. Stem Cells in Facial Regenerative Surgery: Current Clinical Applications. A Multidisciplinary, Systematic Review. Front. Biosci. 2023, 28, 123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. McCrory, D.; Kenny, C.; Fisher, M.; Smit, R.; Cobb, R. Systematic review of non-invasive ventilation and craniofacial fractures: A multidisciplinary perspective and recommendations for management. Br. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2024, 62, 396–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kośmider, K.; Kozakiewicz, A.; Filipiuk, A.; Sławińska, D.; Lejman, M.; Zawitkowska, J. Multiple sclerosis in a child with neurofibromatosis type I—Clinical management of a challenging case. Ann. Agric. Environ. Med. 2022, 29, 309–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. van Roey, V.; Ombashi, S.; Pleumeekers, M.; Mathijssen, I.; van der Molen, A.M.; Munill, M.; Versnel, S. Comparison of two surgical protocols for the treatment of unilateral cleft lip and palate: A multidisciplinary systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2024, 53, 803–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Marszałek-Kruk, B.A.; Myśliwiec, A.; Lipowicz, A.; Wolański, W.; Kulesa-Mrowiecka, M.; Dowgierd, K. Children with Rare Nager Syndrome—Literature Review, Clinical and Physiotherapeutic Management. Genes 2023, 15, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Semerci, Z.M.; Toru, H.S.; Aytekin, E.; Tercanlı, H.; Chiorean, D.M.; Albayrak, Y.; Cotoi, O.S. The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Early Diagnosis and Molecular Classification of Head and Neck Skin Cancers: A Multidisciplinary Approach. Diagnostics 2024, 14, 1477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wróbel, K.; Sikora, M.; Chęciński, M.; Jas, M.; Chlubek, D. Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw—A Continuing Issue. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 7781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Byrne, H.; O’reilly, S.; Weadick, C.S.; Brady, P.; Ni Ríordáin, R. How we manage medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw. Eur. J. Med. Res. 2024, 29, 402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Walczyńska-Dragon, K.; Chęciński, M. Balancing Innovation and Proven Techniques in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. Surgeries 2024, 5, 774-777. https://doi.org/10.3390/surgeries5030062

AMA Style

Walczyńska-Dragon K, Chęciński M. Balancing Innovation and Proven Techniques in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. Surgeries. 2024; 5(3):774-777. https://doi.org/10.3390/surgeries5030062

Chicago/Turabian Style

Walczyńska-Dragon, Karolina, and Maciej Chęciński. 2024. "Balancing Innovation and Proven Techniques in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery" Surgeries 5, no. 3: 774-777. https://doi.org/10.3390/surgeries5030062

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop