Next Article in Journal
Site-Based Patterns of Variation in Leaf Endophytes and Ecophysiological Performance in Sweet Birch (Betula lenta L.) in the Southern Appalachian Mountains, USA: A Preliminary Study
Previous Article in Journal
Some Ecological Characteristics of a Neophyte of the Canary Islands: Pluchea ovalis (Asteraceae)
Previous Article in Special Issue
Response of Herbaceous and Woody Plant Species in Southern Portugal to Cope Oak Decline Associated to Phytophthora cinnamomi
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Floristic Composition and Phytoecological Characterization of Plant Communities in the M’Goun Geopark, High Atlas, Morocco

1
Environmental, Ecological and Agroindustrial Engineering Laboratory, Faculty of Science and Technology Beni Mellal, University Sultan Moulay Sliman, Beni Mellal 23000, Morocco
2
Research Team, Regional Management and Territorial Development, Faculty of Letters and Human Sciences, Cadi Ayyad University, Marrakech 40000, Morocco
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Ecologies 2025, 6(2), 29; https://doi.org/10.3390/ecologies6020029
Submission received: 10 January 2025 / Revised: 9 March 2025 / Accepted: 10 March 2025 / Published: 1 April 2025

Abstract

:
Moroccan vegetation faces significant pressure particularly from human activities and climate change, while most ecosystems lack detailed assessments. Phytoecological studies and species assessments are implemented using vegetation sampling, analysis of climate data, geological substrate maps, and the Digital Elevation Model (DEM). The study area hosts 565 plant species distributed into 74 families, with Asteraceae being the most abundant family, representing 17.7%. In addition, the correspondence analysis test demonstrates that species are grouped into six distinct blocks. Block 1 comprises a set of Quercus ilex forests. Block 2 encompasses Juniperus phoenicea lands and transition zones between Quercus ilex and Juniperus phoenicea. Block 3 represents Pinus halepensis forests and pine occurrences within Quercus ilex and Juniperus phoenicea stands. Block 4 indicates the emergence of xerophytic species alongside the aforementioned species; it forms the upper limits of Blocks 1, 2, and 3. Block 5 corresponds to formations dominated by Juniperus thurifera in association with xerophytes. Block 6 groups together a set of xerophytic species characteristic of high mountain environments. Additionally, Quercus ilex colonizes the subhumid zones and prefers limestone substrates, Juniperus phoenicea and Tetraclinis articulata, and Pinus halepensis occupies the hot part of the semi-arid in limestone, clays, and conglomerates, while the Juniperus thurifera and xerophytes inhabit the cold parts and limestone substrates. The thermo-Mediterranean vegetation level occupies low altitudes, dominated by Tetraclinis articulata, Juniperus phoenicea, and Olea europaea. The meso-Mediterranean level extends to intermediate altitudes, dominated by Quercus ilex and Juniperus phoenicea. While the supra-Mediterranean level is dominated by Quercus ilex, Arbutus unedo, and Cistus creticus. The mountain Mediterranean level, located in the high mountains, is dominated by Juniperus thurifera associated with xerophytes. Finally, the oro-Mediterranean level, found at extreme altitudes, is dominated by xerophytes. Some species within this region are endemic, rare, and threatened. Consequently, the implementation of effective conservation and protection policies is recommended.

1. Introduction

The concept of biodiversity encompasses all genes, species, habitats, and ecosystems on Earth [1]. It has key roles at all levels of ecosystem services, firstly as a regulator of ecosystem processes, as a final ecosystem service, and as a good that is subject to economic valuation or otherwise [2]. However, habitat degradation, intensive agriculture, overexploitation of renewable resources, and climate change have reached unprecedented levels [3]. Biodiversity loss is now recognized as a major and urgent environmental issue, warranting swift action to mitigate it [4]. In addition, biodiversity is a vital sector for its socioeconomic development [5] and also in protected areas [6].
The Mediterranean region is one of the most degraded regions in the world, having undergone significant changes in its primary natural ecosystems [7]. Additionally, the region is recognized as a biodiversity hotspot [8], making it the third richest hotspot in the world in terms of plant diversity [9]. It is home to approximately 30,000 plant species, with over 13,000 of them being endemic, found nowhere else in the world [10]. However, this diversity is threatened due to human population density, urban areas, and agriculture [11]. In addition, the loss, fragmentation, and degradation of habitats due to human activities are the main threats to this richness [12]. This vegetation is organized into elevational belts, commonly referred to as vegetation levels. The Thermo-Mediterranean level extends up to 400–600 m, the Meso-Mediterranean level from 600 to 1000 m, the Supra-Mediterranean level from 1000 to 1600 m, the Oro-Mediterranean level from 1600 to 2200 m, while the Alti-Mediterranean level occurs above 2200 m [13]. Quézel (1976) refined this classification, resulting in a revised system with Infra-Mediterranean, Thermo-Mediterranean, Meso-Mediterranean, Supra-Mediterranean, Montane-Mediterranean, and Oro-Mediterranean levels within the Mediterranean biome [14]. Each belt is characterized by a distinct vegetation cover. For instance, the Oro-Mediterranean level often consists of grazed grasslands or thorny xerophytic garrigues interspersed with sparse Juniperus trees [15]. However, the Montane-Mediterranean level is characterized by conifers (firs, Mediterranean pines, and cedars) [16].
Morocco is home to approximately 24,000 animal species and 7000 plant species [17], due to a wide variety of geological substrates, topographies, and climates [18]. This country inhabits large-scale ecosystem diversity, such as coastal and marine ecosystems; inland aquatic ecosystems and wetlands; terrestrial forest and pre-forest, steppe, and pre-steppe ecosystems; rocky and high mountain ecosystems; agroecosystems; and desert and oasis ecosystems [19]. Indeed, Morocco encompasses a wide coastline along the Atlantic Ocean and the Mediterranean (3500 km), two mountain ranges (the High Atlas, Middle Atlas, Anti-Atlas in the center, and Rif in the North), as well as the oases and desert ecosystems in the South [19].
The High Atlas is one of the most important Moroccan regions in terms of biological diversity and one of the major Mediterranean biodiversity hotspots [20]. Furthermore, the High Atlas meadows inhabit 4200 recorded species, distributed across 940 genera and 135 families, with 550 species endemic to Morocco [21]. The M’Goun Geopark (situated in Central High Atlas) has a rich and varied geological and biological diversity [22]. The High Atlas inhabits an outstanding richness in terms of geology and geosites (Ouzoud Cascades, Imi nifri natural bridge, dinosaurs’ footprints and skeletons, Cathedral Msfrane cliff, and so on), traditional building practices, and world heritage sites [19]. These features led to a significant part of the High Atlas being recognized by UNESCO (2014) as a Global Geopark. However, the region attracts a large number of tourists and camping activity, which causes pollution and exacerbates pressure on the region’s biodiversity. In addition, the vegetation cover in the High Atlas and Geopark M’Goun has experienced unprecedented pressure, climate change, and anthropogenic activities contributing to the loss of 79% of dense forests and 30% of medium dense cover [23]. Gharnit et al. (2025) have assessed the region’s rangeland diversity and proved that these rangelands host 509 species where at least 27.73% of the assessed species are threatened according to the IUCN. The endemism rate is 21%, with 49.5% of these endemic species restricted solely to Morocco. Rarity criteria indicate a 17.43% rarity rate, including 8.4% considered very rare, 4.42% rare, and three vulnerable [24].
Global biodiversity is in rapid decline and halting biodiversity loss is one of the most important challenges humanity must tackle now and in the immediate future [25]. Species diversity is one of the most widely adopted metrics for assessing patterns and processes of biodiversity, at both ecological and biogeographic scales [26], allowing the detection of rare and threatened species; indeed, monitoring of threatened species and threatened ecosystems is critical for determining population trends, identifying the urgency of management responses, and assessing the efficacy of management interventions [27]. Species diversity as measured by inventories is crucial for the selection of areas of conservation and management [28]. In addition, inventories permit detecting the effect of non-native species on native biodiversity with potentially devastating consequences [29]. While ecological studies on restoration have largely focused on community ecology and ecosystem ecology, particularly, plants [24,30]. Therefore, it is important to elaborate not only on the diversity of a site but also on ecology and phytoecology. This evaluation necessitates a rigorous sampling method, such as the Braun–Blanquet approach based on ‘relevés’. This method is widely recognized as an excellent tool for ecological analysis, particularly effective in identifying the diversity of different vegetation types [31].
This study aims to determine the floristic richness and composition of the entire Mgoun Geopark (Morocco), assess species rarity and endemism, and construct a comprehensive phytoecology of the site, including an analysis of elevational vegetation distribution (vegetation levels), bioclimatic conditions (temperatures and precipitations), and substrate types and life forms.

2. Methodology

2.1. Study Area

The UNESCO Global Geopark of M’Goun (Figure 1) constitutes the majority of the massifs of the Central High Atlas in Morocco located in the center of Morocco. The highest point is Ighil M’Goun (4068 m) [32], the area of the Geopark shown in Figure 1, recognized by UNESCO in 2014, is 5700 km2. It encompasses 15 rural communes, housing 200,000 inhabitants [19]. The study area elevation oscillates between 544 m and 3708 m, while the mean elevation of the site is 1588 m.
From a geological perspective, this part of the High Atlas is composed of a thick, folded Meso-Cenozoic cover that almost entirely overlays the underlying Paleozoic basement [33], and a highly diverse geological substrate, comprising limestone, clays, dolomites, marls, volcanic rocks, detrital formations, and others [23]. There are 22 geosites inventoried in the UNESCO Global Geopark of M’Goun: eight sites are purely geological (observation of a geological section or structure), six are paleontological sites (dinosaur footprints), four sites have an anthropogenic origin (rock engravings, architectural heritage, and dam lake), and four sites are geomorphological (the Ouzoud waterfalls, the travertine bridge of Imi-n-Ifri, the Tizi-n-Tighza landslide, and the Mastfrane rock) [19,34].
The region features a variety of topographic and climatic characteristics. The terrain is generally mountainous between 540 and 3700 m, and the bioclimatic zones range from semi-arid or subhumid to humid (with precipitation between 550 mm and 700 mm) [19,23,35], with temperatures ranging from below 0 °C in winter to above 40 °C during summer [19]. Generally, the region has a Mediterranean climate characterized by rainy, cold winters and dry, hot summers [24] as confirmed by Figure 2, Figure 3 and Figure 4.

2.1.1. Temperature

The spatial distribution of minimum, maximum, and annual average temperatures for the entire M’Goun Geopark (Figure 5) illustrates a continentality effect associated with the elevation effect in the Atlas Mountains and the plain. The average annual, maximum, and minimum temperatures are, respectively, around −9.37 °C and 23.4 °C at the mountain peaks and 3 °C and 34. 42 °C at lower elevations.

2.1.2. Rainfall Distribution

The lowest levels are found in the middle of the Geopark and the highest levels are found in the crests of the Atlas Mountains and the plains. The distribution of precipitation (Figure 6) shows a gradient in terms of elevation, linked to the combined effects of oceanic moisture currents and the Atlas Mountain barrier. Moreover, we observe the presence of two large precipitation depressions linked to site effects and topography. They are located in the Zaouit Ahansal Valley, where precipitation does not exceed 350 mm on average, with a total average between 356 and 622 mm.

2.1.3. Bioclimatic Zones

Variations in minimum and maximum temperatures (Table 1), as well as precipitation, act as the primary drivers of shifts in humid and sub-humid bioclimatic zones, including their variety such as extremely cold, very cold, cold, and cool zones (Figure 7). These changes, induced by climatic fluctuations, are not uniform and can be observed at various temporal and spatial scales. The sub-humid varieties are extremely cold, very cold, cold, and fresh, while the semi-arid bioclimate with extremely cold, very cold, cold, and fresh varieties.
Low-elevation areas are primarily used for agricultural purposes. As elevation increases, the amount of cultivated land decreases due to harsher climatic conditions. Agricultural activities gradually transition to extensive livestock grazing, with these higher-elevation areas serving as rangelands [24,36]. The region boasts a rich vegetation cover, rangelands dominate the landscape, while limited areas are cultivated with olive trees, seasonal crops, and other agricultural pursuits [7].

2.2. Methods

2.2.1. Sampling, Species Identification, and Floristic Analysis

A survey carried out generally during the period of vegetation development, when the majority of plant species are visible and easily recognizable (flowering and/or fruiting) [37]. In the field, varying transect sizes were employed to accommodate the diverse topography of the region. Line transects were employed during the sampling process. To ensure sampling representativeness, the sampling was surveyed until the addition of new species became negligible. Data on species presence/absence was recorded during this study.
The sampling surveys in the M’Goun Geopark were conducted in March, April, May, and June of 2022, 2023, and 2024. In total, we implement 206 floristic surveys. This means that we conducted surveys at various points within the area. The transects varied in length, ranging from 50 m to 200 m, the length of line transects was determined based on the slope’s magnitude and shape and a total of 30.900 m of length was sampled.
The identification and location of species, using the practical flora of Morocco [38]. The classification adopted was APG III and APG IV [39,40]. In order to identify the different vegetation groups, the Correspondence Analysis (CA) method is utilized. This statistical technique reduces the dimensions of data into a few components to explain variations [41], and is a multivariate method that allows for the elucidation of relationships between biological assemblages of species and their environment [42].

2.2.2. Phytoecology

Concerning the ecological factors, the map of bioclimatic zones is constructed using Emberger’s Pluviometric Quotient (Q2) for the Mediterranean climatic zone [43],
Q 2 = 1000 P ( M m ) ( M + m ) 2
Q2: bioclimatic quotient index, P: annual precipitation (mm), M: maximum temperature of the warmest month (K), m: minimum temperature of the coldest month (K).
The Q2 permits the characterization of the bioclimatic zones and the minimum temperature during the coldest month aids in defining climatic variants. The selected bioclimatic zones include the Saharan zone, arid zone, semi-arid zone, sub-humid zone, humid zone, and per-humid zone [15]. Each of these climates corresponds to a set of plant communities with the same general characteristics [42].
Vegetation levels are vertical distribution or elevational organization of plant cover, generally adopted by exploitation of the synthetic climate of Emberger, Quézel, and Barbero [19,44], the vegetation strata are thermos-Mediterranean, meso-Mediterranean, Infra-Mediterranean, Oro-Mediterranean, mountain Mediterranean [45].
The life form is determined based on the Raunkiaer system: Th for therophyte; Cr for Cryptophyte (including Geophytes); Hm for Hemicryptophytes; Ch for Chamaephytes; Ph for phanerophytes; and NPh for nanophanerophytes.
Endemism is elaborated using the ‘Flore Pratique du Maroc’ as follows: E: Moroccan endemic, EA: Morocco-Algerian, EC: Morocco and Canary Islands, EP: Morocco and the Iberian Peninsula. EAP: Morocco–Algerian and Iberian Peninsula, EAT: Morocco-Algerian and Tunisia.
Concerning rarity, the catalog of threatened and endemic plants is exploited. Indeed, based on the localities where the species are inventoried, Fennane and Ibn Tattou (1998) have classified Moroccan plant species as extremely rare (RR) for the species encountered in less than five localities, and (RR?) for the suspected very rare species. Rare species (R) for the species reported in two divisions in Emberger and Maire (1941). The suspected rare species are noted (R?). The species that undergo profound changes or are under extreme exploitation are indicated as vulnerable (V), and the species with unknown status are pointed as (??) [46].
The Worldclim is used to access spatial climate data (http://www.worldclim.org: accessed on 20 November 2024). These data were utilized to generate maps of temperature, precipitation, bioclimatic zones, and vegetation levels. Following the data download, the raw maps were clipped to the study area boundary using a shapefile. Subsequently, the pixel resolution of the maps was resampled to 30 m. The ecological factors considered in this analysis include elevation and substrate type. Later, the climatic parameters are determined based on the coordinates of the transect occurrences, projected onto the map of various parameters: Tmin, Tmax, and precipitation. While the substrates are determined using the coordinates of transects and the geological map of Morocco (https://www.mem.gov.ma/en/Pages/secteur.aspx?e=8: accessed on 20 November 2024).

3. Results

3.1. Plant Richness and Floristic Analysis

The flora of the M’Goun Geopark encompasses 565 vascular plant species, distributed among 74 families. The Asteraceae family is the richest, accounting for 17.7% of species inventoried in the M’Goun Geopark (accounting for 100 species). Fabaceae are classified in the second place, with 60 species, and represent 10.62%. Poaceae occupy third place accounting for 37 species (6.55%). Lamiaceae are represented by 32 species (5.75%). Caryophyllaceae had a total number of 31 species representing 5.48% of the Geoparc flora, while Brassicaceae have 30 species (5.31%). Apiaceae have 25 species representing 4.42% of the total species. Plantaginaceae are represented by 17 species (3%). Rubiaceae are represented by 13 species (2.3%). Asparagaceae are represented by 11 species (1.94%) and Amaranthaceae, Caprifoliaceae, and Cistaceae by 10 species each. Euphorbiaceae and Ranunculaceae have 9 species each, while Campanulaceae, Crassulaceae, Geraniaceae, and Rosaceae are represented by 8 species each. The full species list sampled in the study area is provided in the Supplementary File.
The most represented genera are Astragalus represented by nine, followed by Euphorbia and Medicago with eight each. The Centaurea is represented by seven species, Galium, Silene, and Convolvulus, and Genista is represented by six species each. Trifloium and Campanula are represented by 5 species.
The CA plot (Figure 8) and Table 2 reveal that the species are gathered into six blocks, and each bloc may be subdivided into subsets, hence 21 subgroups of species are revealed:
Bloc 1: The floristic composition indicates holm oak (Quercus ilex L.) forests and their clearings in the region. These are subhumid forests of the area. Generally, the subgroups of this bloc are homogenous in terms of floristic composition.
Bloc 2: This group is heterogeneous: F4 and F5. The presence of Quercus ilex L. and Juniperus phoenicea L. suggests that these subgroups are ecotones (transition zones) between Quercus ilex L. and Juniperus phoenicea L. forests. F6 represents Juniperus phoenicea L. forests in a warm semi-arid climate (abundant: Ceratonia siliqua L., Tetraclinis articulata (Vahl) Mast., Ziziphus lotus (L.) Lam.). F7 is another transition zone between Quercus ilex L. ilex, Juniperus phoenicea L., and Pinus halepensis Mill.
Bloc 3: F8 represents Pinus halepensis Mill forests. F9 represents clearings in Pinus halepensis Mill forests, with primarily Glubularia nainii Batt. and Anarrhinum fruticosum Desf. F10 and F11 represent co-occurrence zones of Juniperus phoenicea L. and Pinus halepensis Mill.
Bloc 4: The floristic composition of this group indicates that it is the zone of appearance of xerophytes: Euphorbia niceensis All., Marrubium ayardii Maire, Alyssum spinosum L., Bupleurum spinosum Gouan, and Astragalus granatensis Lam. These are the upper limits of the different groups mentioned above.
Bloc 5: F15 and F16 are formations of Juniperus thurifera L. associated with xerophytes. Deforestation is significant at this level. Consequently, only xerophytes persist (F17). The bundnat species at this level are Cytisus balansae (Boiss.) Ball, Euphorbia niceensis All., Juniperus thurifera L., Scorzonera caespitosa Pomel, Artemisia herba alba Asso, Ormenis scariosa (Ball) Litard, and Maire.
Bloc 6: This is the domain of spiny xerophytes of high mountains, highly rich with Arenaria pungens Clemente ex Lag., Vella mairei Humbert, Alyssum spinosum L, Erinacea anthyllis Link, Bupleurum spinosum Gouan, Cytisus balansae (Boiss.) Ball, Euphorbia niceensis All, Euphorbia megalatlantica Ball, and Scorzonera caespitosa Pomel.

3.2. Endemism and Rarity

Fourty-six species are extremely rare in Morocco, four are suspected very rare, twenty-four are rare, twenty-four are suspected rare, three are vulnerable, and three have unknown status (Figure 9).
Twenty-four species are endemic to Morocco, while thirteen inhabit only Moroccan and Algerian territory. Seven species are endemic to Morocco and the Iberian Peninsula. Fourteen species are endemic to Morocco, Algeria, and the Iberian Peninsula, and two are endemic to Morocco, Algeria, and Tunisia (Figure 10).

3.3. Life Forms

The majority of plants adapted to the ecological conditions of the study area are Therophytes (annual plants), representing roughly 36.24%, and Hemicryptophytes (35.32%). Cryptophytes represent 4.34%, Phanerophytes 10.86%, and Chamephytes 13.15% (Figure 11).
According to the geographic occurrences of the species, 30.53% of species are sampled only in the subhumid climate zone, while 22% occupy the semi-arid level; 52% of them are located in semi-arid fresh and temperate (hot) areas at low elevations, and the rest are situated in the semi-arid cold areas of high mountains. Furthermore, 14% of species are found in both semi-arid hot and subhumid zones, 17% inhabit both subhumid and semi-arid cold zones, and 7% of species colonize all bioclimates in the region (Figure 12).

3.4. The Vegetation Cover

For the A axis (Figure 13A), starting from the north, the northern slopes are characterized by Euphorbia resinefera. Then, Tetraclinis articulata, mixed with Juniperus phoenicea and Ceratonia siliqua becomes dominant. At 1400 m, Tetraclinis articulata disappears, and Juniperus phoenicea, Ceratonia siliqua, and Pistacia lentiscus continue. Around 1600 m, these formations give way to Quercus ilex. In the humid valley of Ait Abbas, Pinus halepensis flourishes between 1200 and 1700 m. The upper limit of Pinus halepensis is inhabited by Juniperus phoenicea between 1800 and 2000 m, followed by Quercus ilex up to 2200 m, where high-mountain xerophytes thrive. The same pattern is repeated on the southern slope (from the Jbel Tizzal summit to the Ait Bougemmez valley), except for the presence of Ormenis scariosa, especially at the Quercus ilex level. After Ait Bougemmaz, Juniperus phoenicea thrives at low elevations, followed by Quercus ilex as the elevation rises. Then, Juniperus thurifera takes over, generally mixed with xerophytes that dominate the landscape starting from 2300 m, where Juniperus thurifera declines
Concerning Axis B (Figure 13B) at the northeastern limit, Chamaerops humilis occupies large areas, occasionally mixed with Quercus ilex (at about 1800 m). Quercus ilex later becomes dominant. Afterward, Juniperus phoenicea appears as the elevation decreases. At low elevations in the Tillouguit site, scattered Tetraclinis articulata trees can be found at about 1300–1400 m. Moving towards the Mesfrane cliff, Juniperus phoenicea becomes the main formation but gradually declines (as the elevation rises) in favor of Pinus halepensis, which dominates the Mesfrane region. The Pinus halepensis and Juniperus phoenicea shape the space, with Juniperus phoenicea dominating the upper limits. The humid parts (northern slopes) are occupied by Buxus balearica and Quercus ilex. At around 1700 m, Pinus halepensis and Juniperus phoenicea disappear, and Quercus ilex takes over. Buxus balearica thrives on rocky soils and cliffs around 2100 m, followed by Juniperus thurifera, which is often mixed with xerophytes (up to 2500 m). These xerophytes become the only species adapted to extreme elevations. Table 3 represents some of the main features of the main vegetation formations. The axis A and B locations are represented in Figure 14.

3.5. The Vegetation Levels and Associated Vegetation

Diversity is generally higher at lower elevations (Thermo- and Meso-Mediterranean), with a gradual decrease as elevation increases. Additionally, diversity is often considerable in formations that encompass more than one vegetation level, commonly referred to as ecotones (F2 and F3) (Table 4).
The vegetation levels in the study area are Thermo-Mediterranean, Meso-Mediterranean, Supra-Mediterranean, Mountain Mediterranean, and Oro-Mediterranean. The Thermo-Mediterranean geographic zone is limited to the northern part of the geopark at an elevation approximately between 544 and 1100 m. The species that characterize this level in the area are Ziziphus lotus and Tetraclinis articulata. This part exhibits significant diversity, as these species are mixed with Juniperus phoenicea, Pistacia lentiscus, Pistacia atlantica, Ceratonia siliqua, and others. As the elevation rises, the Meso-Mediterranean approximately located between 530 and 1800 m takes over, with the appearance of Quercus ilex, which is well adapted to its condition, and mixed with the same species reported in the previous level at the lower. In the Supra-Mediterranean approximately located between 1100 and 2700 m, extensive forests of Quercus ilex dominate the landscape, mixed with Juniperus oxycedrus. In the semi-arid parts of this level, Pinus halepensis forests thrive, generally mixed with Juniperus phoenicea and others. The mountain Mediterranean is approximately located between 1200 and 2300 m and hosts the upper limits of Quercus ilex forests and the majority of Juniperus thurifera, mixed with xerophytes. The bioclimates are generally semi-arid with cold variants at these levels, with some features of the subhumid climate at their lower limits. Finally, the Oro-Mediterranean dominates high mountains, inhabited by xerophytes, the lower Oro-Mediterranean is approximately located between 1900 and 3700 m, while the average Oro-Mediterranean level is approximately located between 2800 and 3700 m (Figure 14). Table 5 represents the Phytoecological synthesis of the main plant formation and species of the geopark M’Goun of the High Atlas of Morocco.

4. Discussion

4.1. Floristic Richness

This study covers an area of remarkable species diversity, with 565 species recorded in the sampled region. The most abundant family is Asteraceae (100 species), followed by Fabaceae, Lamiaceae, Brassicaceae, and Caryophyllaceae. Gharnit et al. (2025) have demonstrated that the rangelands of the study area contain 509 species, while the most prominent botanical family is Asteraceae, Fabaceae, and Poaceae [24]. In Morocco, based on a recent inventory, 155 families, 981 genera, 3913 species, and 426 subspecies of vascular plants are reported [20]. Regarding genera, Silene, with 68 species, Centaurea, Teucrium, Ononis, Euphorbia, Astragalus, Trifolium, and Linaria each have between 40 and 50 species [47]. The richest families are Asteraceae, Fabaceae, and Poaceae; they total 1329 species. Five other families are also among the richest with more than 200 species (Brassicaceae, Lamiaceae, and Caryophyllaceae) and 100 species each (Apiaceae and Scrophulariaceae) [20]. High phylodiversity within the study area can be attributed to the fact that a single mountain may host a series of climatically distinct life zones over short elevational distances [47]. Furthermore, mountains offer a diverse array of habitats, including forests, grasslands, rocky outcrops, and wetlands [48]. Particularly in the High Atlas of Morocco, this region encompasses a diverse range of habitats, including forests, rangelands, grasslands, cliffs, and volcanic landscapes, resulting in a mosaic of dynamic ecosystems [7].
These species are organized into six groups as revealed by the CA plot. The main groups comprise Quercus ilex forests and their clearings, in subhumid areas of the region. Indeed, this tree is well adapted and dominates the subhumid climates in Morocco [49]. While Juniperus phoenicea and associated species form second group in a warm semi-arid climate, generally this plant in one of seriously affected species in the arid (and semi-arid) ecosystems of the Mediterranean [50]. In addition, heterogeneous groups, such as ecotones between Q. ilex and Juniperus phoenicea (F4, F5), and a transition zone between Quercus ilex, Juniperus phoenicea, and Pinus halepensis (F7) are located in the study area. Pinus halepensis forests (F8), and their clearings form a particular group, in the study area, these formations occupy the semi-arid to sub-humid cool bioclimate [51]. Juniperus thurifera formations associated with xerophytes occupy primarily semi-arid cold and subhumid. While extreme elevations represent the domain of spiny xerophytes of high mountains, characterized by species such as Arenaria pungens, Valla mairii, Alyssum spinosum, Erinacea Anthyllis, Bupleurum spinosum, Cytisus balansae, Euphorbia nicaeensis, and Euphorbia megatlantica. In fact, Juniperus thurifera (form 1.33% of the study area) and xerophyte cushions (6.84%) thrive at high elevations in semi-arid and subhumid [7].
The flora of the M’Goun Geopark faces numerous threats of degradation and extinction, primarily driven by uncontrolled development that leads to significant destruction of vegetation cover and its associated habitats. It should be noted that the M’Goun Geopark is constantly impacted by human activity, whether it be through grazing, agriculture, harvesting of medicinal plants, or tourism [24]. The effects of these activities on floral biodiversity are irreversible [23]. Furthermore, 21% of the local species are endemic, 50% species are endemic to Morocco, and 104 species are considered rare, very rare, or vulnerable. Strict endemic taxa are estimated at 951, representing 21% of Moroccan vascular plants [52]. The Asteraceae, Lamiaceae, and Fabaceae families are the richest in endemics, with 98, 77, and 63 species, respectively [46]. Morocco harbors 422 plant species listed as threatened in the IUCN Red List, of which 43 are endemic [53]. A total of 6% of species adapted to the geopark are listed in the IUCN Red List. The rarity rate is 18%, distributed as follows: 46 are extremely rare in Morocco, 24 are rare, and 3 are vulnerable. Morocco is home to 126 families with rare species, and hosts 2185 rare species and 634 rare subspecies [38]. The High Atlas consists of approximately 1916 plant species [54] and has been reported and identified by several authors as true biodiversity hotspots of the Mediterranean region with the most important endemism and rarity [46,55].

4.2. Phytoecology

Morocco presents a variety of climates due to the combined influence of several factors [56]. Two bioclimate zones are located in the area, these levels swap the localities each year in response to the recent climate anomalies. Generally, the semiarid with temperate variants occupy low elevation (lower limit), while its cold and very cold variants dominate, the high elevation along with the subhumid. The vegetation levels in the study area are Thermo-Mediterranean, Meso-Mediterranean, Supra-Mediterranean, Mountain Mediterranean, and Oro-Mediterranean. On the High Atlas Mountains, Defaut classifies the elevational zones as follows: Above 3708 m corresponds to the nival zone; 2800 m to 3708 m (+100 m) reflects upper oro-Mediterranean; 2350 m to 2800 m (+200 m) presents the lower Oro-Mediterranean; 2350 m to 1800 m hosts the mountain Mediterranean zone; 1500 m to 1800 m presents the Supra-Mediterranean zone; 1100 m to 1500 m represents the Meso-Mediterranean zone; while elevations bellow 1500 m are dominated by Thermo- and Infra-Mediterranean [57]. Generally, the Thermo-Mediterranean level hosts Carob, Olive–Mastic shrubland, and Mediterranean conifers; the Meso-Mediterranean contains sclerophyllous forest; while the Supra-Mediterranean hosts deciduous forest; the Mediterranean mountain is inhabited by Mediterranean mountain conifers (Black Pine, Cedar, Fir, etc.); and the Oro-Mediterranean encompasses thurifer junipers [14,58].
The Thermo-Mediterranean zone is the most widespread in Morocco, covering both large horizontal and vertical areas. It is also the most biodiverse. It stretches from sea level up to approximately 1000–1400 m, varying with latitude [45]. In addition, this level is characterized by Tetraclinis articulata, some Juniperus phoenicea, Olea europaea var. sylvestris, Quercus suber forests, Cupressus atlantica [59]. The Thermo-Mediterranean zone within the Geopark is characterized by summer temperatures between 36 and 36.12 °C, while most precipitation occurs during the winter months, totaling 500–569 mm. This zone generally occupies elevations between 661 and 1324 m within the Geopark, although variations may occur due to local conditions and topography. This level contains a rich and diverse flora, including a remarkable set of plant species: Pistacia atlantica, Ziziphus lotus, Tetraclinis articulata, Juniperus, phoenicea, Juniperus oxycedrus, Polygala balansae, Rhus pentaphylla, Cistus salviifolius, Teucrium fruticans, Olea europaea, Ceratonia siliqua, Chamaerops humilis, Pistacia lentiscus.
The Meso-Mediterranean contain Juniperus phoenicea, Pistacia lentiscus, Pinus halepensis, Tetraclinis articulata, and Quercus ilex [13]. Its elevational range fluctuates between approximately 900 and 1400 m in the Rif, and 1100 and 1500 m in the High Atlas. In addition, the holm oak (Quercus rotundifolia) forms at this level more or less open forest formations which become increasingly tall and dense with elevation [45]. The Meso-Mediterranean zone represents a transitional area between the Thermo-Mediterranean zone and more continental climates. It is characterized by a reduction in the seasonal contrasts observed in the Thermo-Mediterranean zone. Summers are less hot and dry compared to the Thermo-Mediterranean, with more frequent precipitation (500–550 mm). Winters are colder, with occasional frosts, and precipitation is distributed over a longer period but is distinguished by a lower diversity. Its elevational extension is approximately between 522 and 2067 m. The characteristic bioclimates of this level are semi-arid to subhumid, with essentially cool variants. Frosts are relatively frequent. This level is home to a specific flora, of which the dominant species is Holm oak (Quercus ilex); this species finds its optimal development at this level. Ozenda (1975) indicates that this level encompasses also Cork oak (Quercus suber) forming a few individuals inside the holm oak domains. Strawberry tree (Arbutus unedo), Wild olive tree (Olea europaea) Algerian thuya (Tetraclinis articulata) Carob tree (Ceratonia siliqua) Mastic tree (Pistacia lentiscus) Dwarf palm (Chamaerops humilis). The Meso-Mediterranean zone is characterized by having a complex cover formed by Q. callipinos, Qu. suber, pines, and other conifers [13].
The Supra-Mediterranean is dominated by sclerophyllous oak forests [45]. Within the Geopark, it occupies elevations ranging from 1017 to 1800 m, characterized by cooler and wetter climatic conditions. Maximum temperatures are generally cooler than lower elevations with more pronounced thermal amplitudes. Precipitation is more abundant and distributed over a longer period of the year, averaging between 400 and 450 mm. This level corresponds to deciduous oak forests and mixed deciduous–coniferous formations. The characteristic bioclimates of this level in the study area are of a semi-arid type to subhumid, with essentially cool variants. Snow precipitations are frequent. Holm oak (Quercus ilex) forests dominate the lower parts of this level, along with Arbutus unedo, Cistus creticus, and Thymus zygis. In the Mediterranean, this belt dominates in high mountains between 800 and 1700 m.a.s.l., occupied by pine trees accompanied by some other conifers, mixed temperate forests of conifers, oaks (Quercus pyrenaica, Quercus pubescens), strawberry trees (Arbutus unedo, Arbutus andrachne) and a prickly juniper (Juniperus oxycedrus) [60]. In Morocco, this level lies between approximately 1400 and 1800 m and is characterized by sclerophyllous oak forests (Quercus rotundifolia, Quercus suber) in relatively dry areas, deciduous oak forests (Quercus faginea, Quercus canariensis, Quercus pyrenaica) in humid areas, and coniferous formations (Cedrus atlantica, Abies maroccana) in humid areas where the thermal factor eliminates deciduous broadleaves at higher elevations [45]. The Supra-Meditterranean zone is typified by deciduous oak forests, along with Ostrya and other broad-leaved trees [13].
Mountain Mediterranean highlights the transition between the milder Mediterranean climates of the plains and the harsher mountain climates at higher elevations. elevations typically range between 1800 and 2350 m but can vary depending on topography and site features (Aspect, slope, wind, and climate). Among the major forest species, we observe Quercus rotundifolia and Juniperus thurifera. This level is found only in the high mountains of Morocco. It is the high-elevation forest level of the cold and very cold variants of the subhumid, humid, and perhumid bioclimates, exceptionally semi-arid. The base of the belt level reaches 2000 m in the High Atlas, while its ceiling reaches 2600 m [45].
Oro-Mediterranean is the culminating vegetation stage, observed only on the highest peaks of the Geopark. Its elevational limits are difficult to determine precisely. Pre-forest groups disappear giving way to cushion-forming xerophytic groups which reach 3700 m. The lower arboreal part corresponds to the lower Oro-Mediterranean. We can estimate that very cold subhumid and extremely cold and semi-arid bioclimates characterize these elevational levels. Certain pre-forest series of the lower Oro-Mediterranean, the Juniperus thurifera series, and cushion-forming xerophytes extend over the highest peaks of the Geopark, and under extremely cold semi-arid and subhumid sub-bioclimates. This belt occurs around 2300 m in the Middle Atlas and 2600 m in the High Atlas. In turn, the pre-forest formations disappear between 2800 and 3200 m, making way for xerophytes, which can reach elevations of between 3600 and 3800 m [45]. The thorny xerophytes dominate high elevations in the areas of Ait Boulli, Ait Bouguemmez, Zauit Ahansal, and Anergui. These species include Bupleurum spinosum or Bupleurum atlanticum, Alyssum spinosum, Erinacea Anthyllis, Cytisus Balansae or Cytisus purgans, Ormenis scariosa, and Arenaria pungens. It begins at an elevation from 2000 to 3200 m and grows generally on a calcareous substrate.
The soil nature in the area is generally limestones associated with dolomite or marls and the clays associated with sandstones [23,24]. Our study confirms that the Quercus ilex formations are typically found on limestone substrates. Pinus halepensis occupies a wider range of substrates, including limestone, clays, and conglomerates. Juniperus phoenicea is more commonly associated with clays and sandstones. Xerophytic species are often found in association with Juniperus thurifera and tend to inhabit limestone substrates. Furthermore, the region is characterized by volcanic soils generally basaltic [19].
Figure 15 shows the general aspects of some vegetal formation in the area. This region showcases the remarkable biodiversity of the High Atlas ecosystems, yet it is crucial to underscore that many species within these ecosystems are facing significant degradation and threats. This biodiversity decline is further exacerbated by the impacts of climate change. The local population heavily relies on these natural resources for their livelihoods, utilizing them for wood, rangelands, and livestock forage. Therefore, these forests are vital for maintaining biodiversity and supporting sustainable development policies. As a result, the protection and conservation of these forests are of paramount importance to avoid the severe consequences of their loss. Indeed, the loss of biodiversity may lead to a decrease in ecosystems’ climate resilience, accelerating the effects of climate change [61], and this loss reduces the stability of an ecosystem [62]. In addition, biodiversity loss may impact society, economy, health, food environment, societal structures, rural life, food security and livelihoods, and resilience of rural communities profoundly [63]. Several crucial conservation measures are necessary to safeguard the flora of the M’Goun Geopark. These include implementing rigorous investigations and comprehensive ecosystem assessments; establishing a well-defined network of protected areas, carefully selected based on specific criteria (diversity and activities); improving social conditions and local infrastructure to alleviate pressure on natural resources; fostering community engagement through awareness campaigns and active participation in conservation efforts; and utilizing the funding from this study as a foundation for ecosystem restoration and remediation initiatives.

5. Conclusions

The Moroccan flora exhibits exceptional diversity, a fact underscored by the outstanding species richness found in Geopark M’Goun and the High Atlas Mountains. The region’s vegetation cover comprises a mosaic of habitats, including holm oak, Phoenician juniper, Tetraclinis, and juniper thurifera. Moreover, these species form communities adapted to a wide range of ecological conditions, encompassing variations in temperature, precipitation, soil type, elevation, and cover nature.
The status of the majority of species remains unknown, and their true levels of rarity and the threats they face are unclear. This study identifies species that urgently require management and conservation policies, particularly in the context of increasing concerns about climate change. Rising temperatures, declining precipitation, and unprecedented heatwaves are exacerbating these threats. These factors, combined with destructive human activities such as uncontrolled exploitation of natural resources, particularly wood and charcoal production, and extensive overgrazing, have a significant impact. To mitigate these challenges, it is imperative to implement urgent conservation measures for threatened species and effective management strategies for the forests of the High Atlas of Morocco.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ecologies6020029/s1.

Author Contributions

Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by A.O. and Y.G. The first draft of the manuscript was written by A.O., Y.G., A.M. and K.E.H. Supervision and guidance: A.B. and A.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data supporting this study are available upon request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We extend our sincere gratitude to all those who assisted us during this research.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests, and this study did not receive any specific grant from any funding source. We declare that this work has not been previously published and it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere.

References

  1. Séné, A.M. Perte et lutte pour la biodiversité: Perceptions et débats contradictoires. VertigO-la Rev. Électronique en Sci. L’environnement 2010, 10, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  2. Mace, G.M.; Norris, K.; Fitter, A.H. Biodiversity and ecosystem services: A multilayered relationship. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2012, 27, 19–26. [Google Scholar]
  3. Bureau, D.; Bureau, J.-C.; Schubert, K. Biodiversité en danger: Quelle réponse économique? Notes du Cons. D’analyse Économique 2020, 59, 1–12. Available online: https://www.cairn.info/load_pdf.php?ID_ARTICLE=NCAE_059_0001 (accessed on 25 November 2024).
  4. Mauz, I.; Granjou, C. La construction de la biodiversité comme problème politique et scientifique, premiers résultats d’une enquête en cours. Sci. Eaux Territ. 2010, 3, 10–13. Available online: https://www.cairn.info/load_pdf.php?ID_ARTICLE=SET_003_0010 (accessed on 25 November 2024).
  5. Menioui, M. Biological diversity in Morocco. In Global Biodiversity; Apple Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 2018; pp. 133–171+452. [Google Scholar]
  6. Pisani, D.; Pazienza, P.; Perrino, E.V.; Caporale, D.; De Lucia, C. The economic valuation of ecosystem services of biodiversity components in protected areas: A review for a framework of analysis for the Gargano National Park. Sustainability 2021, 13, 11726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Gharnit, Y.; Outourakhte, A.; Moujane, A.; Ikhmerdi, H.; Hasib, A.; Boulli, A. Habitat diversity, ecology, and change assessment in the geoparc M’goun in High Atlas Mountains of Morocco. Geol. Ecol. Landsc. 2024; 1–22, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Médail, F.; Diadema, K. Biodiversité végétale méditerranéenne. Ann. Georgr. 2006, 115, 618–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Mittermeier, R.A.; Myers, N.; Mittermeier, C.G.; Robles Gil, P. Hotspots: Earth’s Biologically Richest and Most Endangered Terrestrial Ecoregions; Cemex, S.A., Agrupación Sierra Madre, S.C., Eds.; Graphic Arts Center Publishing Company: Washington, DC, USA, 1999; 431p. [Google Scholar]
  10. Derneği, D. Ecosystem Profile: Mediterranean Basin Biodiversity Hotspot; BirdLife International: Cambridge, UK, 2010; p. 259. [Google Scholar]
  11. Underwood, E.C.; Viers, J.H.; Klausmeyer, K.R.; Cox, R.L.; Shaw, M.R. Threats and biodiversity in the mediterranean biome. In Diversity and Distributions; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2009; Volume 15, pp. 188–197. [Google Scholar]
  12. Cuttelod, A.; García, N.; Malak, D.A.; Temple, H.J.; Katariya, V. The Mediterranean: A biodiversity hotspot under threat. In Wildlife in a Changing World—An Analysis of the 2008 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species; IUCN: Gland, Switzerland, 2009; Volume 89, pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  13. Ozenda, P. Sur les étages de végétation dans les montagnes du bassin méditerranéen. Doc. Cart. Ecol. 1975, 16, 1–32. [Google Scholar]
  14. Barbero, M.; Quézel, P. Les groupements forestiers de Grèce centro-méridionale. Ecol. Mediterr. 1976, 2, 3–86. [Google Scholar]
  15. Quézel, P.; Barbero, M. Definition and characterization of Mediterranean-type ecosystems. Ecol. Mediterr. 1982, 8, 15–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Tassin, C. Paysages Végétaux du Domaine Méditerranéen: Bassin Méditerranéen, Californie, Chili Central, Afrique du Sud, Australie Méridionale; IRD Éditions: Marseille, France, 2012; 424p. [Google Scholar]
  17. Benryane, M.A.; Belqadi, L.; Bounou, S.; Birouk, A. Analyse de la mise en œuvre du protocole de nagoya au maroc: Importance et limites de la gouvernance de la biodiversite. Rev. des Études Multidiscip. en Sci. Économiques Soc. 2022, 7, 167–196. [Google Scholar]
  18. Ilmen, R.; Benjelloun, H. Les écosystèmes forestiers marocains à l’épreuve des changements climatiques. Forêt Méditerranéenne 2013, XXXIV, 195–208. [Google Scholar]
  19. Gharnit, Y.; Outourakht, A.; Boulli, A.; Hassib, A. Biodiversity, Autecology and Status of Aromatic and Medicinal Plants in Geopark M’Goun (Morocco). Ann. di Bot. 2023, 13, 39–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Fennane, M.; Ibn Tattou, M. Statistiques et commentaires sur l’inventaire actuel de la flore vasculaire du Maroc. Bull. l’Institut Sci. Rabat, Sect. Sci. la Vie 2012, 34, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  21. Mostakim, L.; Guennoun, F.Z.; Fetnassi, N.; Ghamizi, M. Analysis of floristic diversity of the forest ecosystems of the Zat valley-High Atlas of Morocco: Valorization and conservation perspectives. J. Adv. Biotechnol. Exp. Ther. 2021, 5, 126–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. El Alami, A.; Fattah, A.; Bouzekraoui, H. Biodiversity, an essential component for the M’goun global geopark development (Morocco)-An overview. J. Anal. Sci. Appl. Biotechnol. 2021, 3, 103–106. [Google Scholar]
  23. Youssef, G.; Abdelaziz, M.; Aboubakre, O.; Abdelali, B.; Aziz, H. Impact of climate and demographic changes on the vegetation of the M’goun Geopark UNESCO of Morocco (1984–2021). Investig. Geográficas 2024, 81, 225–243. [Google Scholar]
  24. Gharnit, Y.; Moujane, A.; Outourakhte, A.; Hassan, I.; El Amraoui, K.; Hasib, A.; Boulli, A. Plant Richness, Species Assessment, and Ecology in the M’goun Geopark Rangelands, High Atlas Mountains, Morocco. Rangel. Ecol. Manag. 2025, 98, 357–376. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1550742424001490 (accessed on 4 January 2025). [CrossRef]
  25. Damiani, M.; Sinkko, T.; Caldeira, C.; Tosches, D.; Robuchon, M.; Sala, S. Critical review of methods and models for biodiversity impact assessment and their applicability in the LCA context. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 2023, 101, 107134. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925523001002 (accessed on 10 December 2024).
  26. Chiarucci, A.; Bacaro, G.; Scheiner, S.M. Old and new challenges in using species diversity for assessing biodiversity. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2011, 366, 2426–2437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lindenmayer, D.; Woinarski, J.; Legge, S.; Southwell, D.; Lavery, T.; Robinson, N.; Scheele, B.; Wintle, B. A checklist of attributes for effective monitoring of threatened species and threatened ecosystems. J. Environ. Manag. 2020, 262, 110312. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479720302474 (accessed on 20 November 2024).
  28. Green, M.J.B.; How, R.; Padmalal, U.; Dissanayake, S.R.B. The importance of monitoring biological diversity and its application in Sri Lanka. Trop. Ecol. 2009, 50, 41. [Google Scholar]
  29. Pauchard, A.; Meyerson, L.A.; Bacher, S.; Blackburn, T.M.; Brundu, G.; Cadotte, M.W.; Courchamp, F.; Essl, F.; Genovesi, P.; Haider, S. Biodiversity assessments: Origin matters. PLoS Biol. 2018, 16, e2006686. [Google Scholar]
  30. Vaughn, K.J.; Porensky, L.M.; Wilkerson, M.L.; Balachowski, J.; Peffer, E.; Riginos, C.; Young, T.P. Restoration ecology. Nat. Educ. Knowl. 2010, 3, 66. [Google Scholar]
  31. Van Der Maarel, E. The Braun-Blanquet approach in perspective. Vegetatio 1975, 30, 213–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Bussard, J.; Martin, S.; Monbaron, M.; Reynard, E.; El Khalki, Y. Geomorphological landscapes of the Central High Atlas (Morocco): Educative potential and resources for interpretation. Geomorphol. Process. Environ. 2022, 28, 173–185. [Google Scholar]
  33. Frizon de Lamotte, D.; Zizi, M.; Missenard, Y.; Hafid, M.; El Azzouzi, M.; Maury, R.C.; Charrière, A.; Taki, Z.; Benammi, M.; Michard, A. The Atlas System. In Continental Evolution: The Geology of Morocco: Structure, Stratigraphy, and Tectonics of the Africa-Atlantic-Mediterranean Triple Junction; Michard, A., Saddiqi, O., Chalouan, A., Lamotte, D.F.d., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2008; pp. 133–202. [Google Scholar]
  34. Bussard, J.; Martin, S.; Monbaron, M.; Reynard, E.; Khalki, Y. El Les paysages géomorphologiques du Haut Atlas central (Maroc): Potentiel éducatif et éléments pour la médiation scientifique. Géomorphologie Reli. Process. Environ. 2022, 28, 173–185. [Google Scholar]
  35. Taïbi, A.N.; Hannani, M.E.; Khalki, Y.E.; Ballouche, A. Les parcs agroforestiers d’Azilal (Maroc): Une construction paysagère pluri-séculaire et toujours vivante. Rev. Géographie Alp. 2019, 107, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Moujane, A.; Boulli, A.; Gharnit, Y.; Outourakhte, A.; Ouigmane, A. Assessing of forest cover changes in Zaouit Ahansal (Central High Atlas, Morocco) using remote sensing and field data. J. Mater. Environ. Sci. 2024, 15, 1558. [Google Scholar]
  37. Ozenda, P. Les végétaux dans la biosphère. Rev. Géographie Alp. 1982, 6, 310–311. [Google Scholar]
  38. Fennane, M. Catalogue des plantes vascularies rares, menacées ou endémiques du Maroc. Bocconea 1998, 8, 5–243. [Google Scholar]
  39. APG Angiosperm Phylogeny Group III (APG III). An update of The Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG III. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 2009, 161, 105–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. The Angiosperm Phylogeny Group; Chase, M.W.; Christenhusz, M.J.M.; Fay, M.F.; Byng, J.W.; Judd, W.S.; Soltis, D.E.; Mabberley, D.J.; Sennikov, A.N.; Soltis, P.S.; et al. An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG IV. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 2016, 181, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Viscarra Rossel, R.A.; Behrens, T.; Ben-Dor, E.; Brown, D.J.; Demattê, J.A.M.; Shepherd, K.D.; Shi, Z.; Stenberg, B.; Stevens, A.; Adamchuk, V.; et al. A global spectral library to characterize the world’s soil. Earth-Sci. Rev. 2016, 155, 198–230. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0012825216300113 (accessed on 14 November 2024).
  42. ter Braak, C.J.F.; Verdonschot, P.F.M. Canonical correspondence analysis and related multivariate methods in aquatic ecology. Aquat. Sci. 1995, 57, 255–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Daget, P. Le bioclimat méditerranéen: Analyse des formes climatiques par le système d’Emberger. Vegetatio 1977, 34, 87–103. [Google Scholar]
  44. Calvet, C. Interprétation hydrique de la notion d’étage de végétation selon L. Emberger: Application au Maroc (Meteoric water and Emberger’s vegetation levels in Morocco). Bull. Assoc. Geogr. Fr. 1979, 56, 331–339. [Google Scholar]
  45. Achhal, A.; Akabli, A.; Barbero, M.; Benabid, A.; M’Hirit, O.; Peyre, C.; Quézel, P.; Rivas-Martinez, S. À propos de la valeur bioclimatique et dynamique de quelques essences forestières au Maroc. Ecol. Mediterr. 1979, 5, 211–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Benabid, A. Les écosystèmes forestiers, préforestiers et presteppiques du Maroc: Diversité, répartition biogéographique et problèmes posés par leur aménagement. Forêt Méditerranéenne 1985, 7, 53–64. [Google Scholar]
  47. Ibn Tattou, M.; Fennane, M. Aperçu historique et état actuel des connaissances sur la flore vasculaire du Maroc. Bull. Inst. Sci 1989, 13, 85–94. [Google Scholar]
  48. Körner, C. Mountain biodiversity, its causes and function: An overview. In Mountain Biodiversity; Routledge: London, UK, 2024; pp. 3–20. [Google Scholar]
  49. Spehn, E.M.; Rudmann-Maurer, K.; Körner, C. Mountain biodiversity. Plant Ecol. Divers. 2011, 4, 301–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Dundas, J. The Vegetation of Morocco and Western Algeria. J. Ecol. 1939, 27, 546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. El-Barougy, R.F.; Dakhil, M.A.; Halmy, M.W.A.; Cadotte, M.; Dias, S.; Farahat, E.A.; El-keblawy, A.; Bersier, L.-F. Potential extinction risk of Juniperus phoenicea under global climate change: Towards conservation planning. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 2023, 46, e02541. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351989423001762 (accessed on 20 October 2024). [CrossRef]
  52. Belghazi, B.; Ezzahiri, M.; Romane, F. Productivité de peuplements naturels de pin d’Alep (Pinus halepensis Miller) dans la forêt de Tamga (Haut Atlas, Maroc). Cah. Agric. 2000, 9, 39–46. [Google Scholar]
  53. Fougrach, H.; Badri, W.; Malki, M. Flore vasculaire rare et menacée du massif de Tazekka (région de Taza, Maroc). Bull. l’Institut Sci. Rabat Sect. Sci. la Vie 2007, 29, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  54. Fennane, M.; De Montmollin, B. Réflexions sur les critères de l’UICN pour la Liste rouge: Cas de la flore marocaine. Bull. l’Institut Sci. Rabat 2015, 37, 1–11. [Google Scholar]
  55. Teixidor-Toneu, I.; M’Sou, S.; Salamat, H.; Baskad, H.A.; Illigh, F.A.; Atyah, T.; Mouhdach, H.; Rankou, H.; Babahmad, R.A.; Caruso, E.; et al. Which plants matter? A comparison of academic and community assessments of plant value and conservation status in the Moroccan High Atlas. Ambio 2022, 51, 799–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Medail, F.; Quezel, P. Hot-spots analysis for conservation of plant biodiversity in the Mediterranean Basin. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 1997, 84, 112–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Maliha, N.S.; Chaloud, D.J.; Kepner, W.G.; Sarri, S. Regional Assessment of Landscape and Land Use Change in the Mediterranean Region BT—Environmental Change and Human Security: Recognizing and Acting on Hazard Impacts. In Environmental Change and Human Security: Recognizing and Acting on Hazard Impacts; Liotta, P.H., Mouat, D.A., Kepner, W.G., Lancaster, J.M., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2008; pp. 143–165. [Google Scholar]
  58. Defaut, B. Nouvelles considérations sur les phytoclimats du Maroc. Application au Maroc oriental. Matériaux Orthoptériques Et Entomocénotiques 2015, 20, 97–106. [Google Scholar]
  59. Benabid, A. Bref aperçu sur la zonation altitudinale de la végétation climacique du Maroc. Ecol. Mediterr. 1982, 8, 301–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Vargas, P. The Mediterranean Floristic Region: High Diversity of Plants and Vegetation Types; Goldstein, M.I., DellaSala DABTE of the WB, Eds.; Elsevier: Oxford, UK, 2020; pp. 602–616. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780124095489120974 (accessed on 1 November 2024).
  61. Kim, A.-Y.; Lee, W.-S.; Son, Y. The Interaction between Climate Change and Biodiversity Can Be Assessed from a Material Cycle Perspective. Diversity 2024, 16, 506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Kleespies, M.W.; Dierkes, P.W. Personal Assessment of Reasons for the Loss of Global Biodiversity—An Empirical Analysis. Sustainability 2020, 12, 4277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Ebel, R.; Menalled, F.; Ahmed, S.; Gingrich, S.; Baldinelli, G.M.; Félix, G.F. How biodiversity loss affects society. In Handbook on the Human Impact of Agriculture; Edward Elgar Publishing: Cheltenham, UK, 2021; pp. 352–376. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Study area location.
Figure 1. Study area location.
Ecologies 06 00029 g001
Figure 2. Climate diagram of station A (900 m).
Figure 2. Climate diagram of station A (900 m).
Ecologies 06 00029 g002
Figure 3. Climate diagram for station B (1900 m).
Figure 3. Climate diagram for station B (1900 m).
Ecologies 06 00029 g003
Figure 4. Climate diagram for station C (2700 m).
Figure 4. Climate diagram for station C (2700 m).
Ecologies 06 00029 g004
Figure 5. (A) Minimum temperature map, (B) maximum temperature map.
Figure 5. (A) Minimum temperature map, (B) maximum temperature map.
Ecologies 06 00029 g005
Figure 6. Precipitation map of the M’Goun Geopark area.
Figure 6. Precipitation map of the M’Goun Geopark area.
Ecologies 06 00029 g006
Figure 7. Spatial distribution of bioclimatic zones ((A) 1960–1969), ((B) 1970–1979), ((C) 1980–1989), ((D) 1990–1999) ((E) 2000–2009) and ((F) 2010–2019) in the M’Goun Geopark.
Figure 7. Spatial distribution of bioclimatic zones ((A) 1960–1969), ((B) 1970–1979), ((C) 1980–1989), ((D) 1990–1999) ((E) 2000–2009) and ((F) 2010–2019) in the M’Goun Geopark.
Ecologies 06 00029 g007
Figure 8. The CA plot of floristic composition in the study area.
Figure 8. The CA plot of floristic composition in the study area.
Ecologies 06 00029 g008
Figure 9. The rarity rate in the area.
Figure 9. The rarity rate in the area.
Ecologies 06 00029 g009
Figure 10. The endemism rate in the study area.
Figure 10. The endemism rate in the study area.
Ecologies 06 00029 g010
Figure 11. The life forms distribution of Geopark species.
Figure 11. The life forms distribution of Geopark species.
Ecologies 06 00029 g011
Figure 12. Species distribution according to climate zone (SH: subhumid, SAh: semi-arid hot, SAc: semi-arid cold).
Figure 12. Species distribution according to climate zone (SH: subhumid, SAh: semi-arid hot, SAc: semi-arid cold).
Ecologies 06 00029 g012
Figure 13. The vegetation profiles. (A) Demnat—Ait Bougemmaz axis, (B) axis Tillouguit—Zaouit Ahensal.
Figure 13. The vegetation profiles. (A) Demnat—Ait Bougemmaz axis, (B) axis Tillouguit—Zaouit Ahensal.
Ecologies 06 00029 g013
Figure 14. The vegetation levels in the study area.
Figure 14. The vegetation levels in the study area.
Ecologies 06 00029 g014
Figure 15. Aspects of habitats in the study area: (A) Holm oak (Quercus ilex), (B) Aleppo pine (Pinus halepensis), (C) Juniperus thurifera, (D) Spiny xerophytes, (E) Phoenician juniper (Juniperus phoenicea) and Tetraclinis articulata, (F) Chamaerops humilis.
Figure 15. Aspects of habitats in the study area: (A) Holm oak (Quercus ilex), (B) Aleppo pine (Pinus halepensis), (C) Juniperus thurifera, (D) Spiny xerophytes, (E) Phoenician juniper (Juniperus phoenicea) and Tetraclinis articulata, (F) Chamaerops humilis.
Ecologies 06 00029 g015aEcologies 06 00029 g015b
Table 1. The climate patterns fluctuations between 1960 and 2019.
Table 1. The climate patterns fluctuations between 1960 and 2019.
PeriodTmin (Min–Max) in °CTmax (Min–Max) in °CPrecipitations (Min–Max) in mmQ2 (Min–Max)
1960–1969−9.97–2.1820.9–30.83369.67–658.6842.63–77.62
1970–1979−9.37–3.1223.5–34.42350.32–605.8137.92–66.91
1980–1989−10–2.3423.5–34.63295.56–506.2831–54.39
1990–1999−9.74–2.8923.87–35.17307.88–541.5832.34–58.25
2000–2009−8.86–2.3924.42–35.65309.58–533.4932–57.67
2010–2019−9.39–324.60–36.12329.25–571.1933.96–60.76
Table 2. The floristic assemblages and their floristic composition.
Table 2. The floristic assemblages and their floristic composition.
Blocs TransectsAbundant Species
Bloc 1F1T6, T14,
T4, T2,
T5, T1,
T56, T7
Quercus ilex, Anchusa azurea, Astragalus incanus, Bromus madritensis, Campanula filicaulis, Catananche caerulea, Echinops spinosissimus, Lactuca tenerrima, Silene vulgaris, Asperula hirsuta, Picnomon acarna
F2T34, T36, T32, T15, T8, T35, T31,
T10, T25, T9, T45, T18, T11
Galium tricornicum, Papaver rhoeas, Bromus madritensis, Quercus ilex, Anchusa azurea, Medicago minima, Mantisalca salmantica, Plantago afra, Scolymus hispanicus, Beta macrocarpa, Medicago monspeliaca, Silene vulgaris, Sonchus asper
F3T3, T13, T29, T17, T57, T39, T20, T23, T19, T24, T22, T16Quercus ilex, Hordeum murinum, Asphodelus macrocarpus, Galium tricornicum, Romulea bulbocodium, Anchusa azurea, Asperula hirsuta, Astragalus hamosus, Echinaria capitata, Echinops spinosissimus, Ononis cristata, Salvia verbenaca
Bloc 2F4T146, T78, T145, T51, T55, T27, T42, T46Quercus ilex, Clematis cirrhosa, Echinops spinosissimus, Arthemisia herba alba, Bromus madritensis, Buxus balearica, Carlina hispanica, Chamaerops humilis, Convolvulus althaeoides, Hordeum murinum, Juniperus phoenicea
F5T100, T47, T41, T107, T85, T30, T101, T86, T125, T43, T106, T99, T82, T105Juniperus phoenicea, Anchusa azurea, Quercus ilex, Silene vulgaris, Alyssum alyssoides, Asperula arvensis, Atractylis cancellata, Avena fatua, Dactylis glomerata, Erodium cicutarium, Hedypnois rhagadioloides, Isatis tinctoria, Lactuca tenerrima, Medicago minima, Papaver rhoeas, Schismus barbatus, Torilis leptophylla
F6T89, T69, T120, T75, T94, T62, T67, T68, T72, T118, T129, T81, T61, T92, T96, T66, T71, T95, T73, T104, T63, T81, T49, T88, T91, T93, T90, T101, T64, T93, T63Juniperus phoenicea, Stipellula capensis, Chamaerops humilis, Bromus madritensis, Pistacia lentiscus, Atractylis cancellata, A. sterilis, Torilis nodosa, Ceratonia siliqua, Cladanthus arabicus, Sonchus oleraceus, Tetraclinis articulata, Ziziphus lotus, Euphorbia resinifera…
F7T139, T111, T133, T102 T77, T98, T28 T84, T87, T80, T103, T110, T144, T130, T131, T121, T49, T46 Juniperus phoenicea, Picnomon acarna, Pinus halepensis, Buxus balearica, Quercus ilex, Thymus algeriensis, Lactuca tenerrima, Thymus saturejoides, Ajuga iva, Chondrella jencea, Crambe filiformis, Dactylis glomerata, Deverra scoparia, Genista scorpius, Globularia nainii, Lactuca viminea, Phagnalon saxatile, Phillyrea angustifolia, Salvia verbenaca, Teucrium polium, Thymus zygis
Bloc 3F8T127, T140, T117, T135, T151, T126Pinus halepensis, Globularia nainii, Buxus balearica, C. corymbosa, Centaurea melitensis, Cistus creticus, Euphorbia niceensis, Fraxinus angustifolia, Fumana ericoides, Narsturia officinalis, Polygala balansae, Sedum sediforme, Stipellula capensis
F9T44, T148, T132, T150Thymus zygis, Anarrhinum fruticosum, Globularia nainii, Arbutus unedo, Astragalus incanus, Euphorbia taurinensis, Ononis pusilla, Fraxinus angustifolia, Schismus barbatus, Ajuga iva
F10T141, T143, T116, T136, T142, 128,Juniperus phoenicea, Xanthium spinosus, Ajuga iva, Andryala integrifolia, Capparis spinosa, Crambe filiformis, Dittrichia viscosa, Erodium cicutarium, Globularia alypum, Melilotus sulcatus, Mentha peligium, Mentha suaveolens, Nerium oleander, Pinus halepensis, Pistacia lentiscus, Polypogon minspeliensis, Schismus barbatus
F11T124, T119, T112, T149, T137, T108, T114, T113, T115, T147Globularia nainii, Hirschfeldia incana, Lythrum junceum, Pinus halepensis, Pistacia lentiscus, Polygala balansae, Teucrium polium, Bombycilaena erecta, Centaurea calcitrapa, Chondrella jencea, Cistus creticus, Juniperus phoeniceae, Nerium oleander, Populus nigra, Schismus barbatus, Veronica polita, Anarrhinum fruticosum, Centaurea melitensis, Cistus albidus, Dianthus nudiflorus, Dittrichia viscosa
Bloc 4F12T52, T54, T160, T53, T50, T194, T196, T161Euphorbia niceensis, Fraxinus angustifolia, Polycarpon tetraphyllum, Bellis annua, Eryngium campestre, Lactuca tenerrima, poclama brevifolia, Quercus, Astragalus incanus, Bromus madritensis, Crambe filiformis, Euphorbia terracina, Globularia nainii, Marrubium ayardii
F13T175, T162, T195, T190Teucrium chamaedrys, Alyssum spinosum, Polycarpon tetraphyllum, Arenaria pungens, asperula hirsuta, Bupleurum spinosum, Cerastium arvense, Helianthemum cenereum, Jurinea humilis, Minuartia funkii, Thymelaea virgata, Thymus zygis
F14T193, T58, T38, T197, T37, T59Quercus ilex, Astragalus granatensis, Campanula filicaulis, Ononis spinosa, Polycarpon tetraphyllum, Scutellaria orientalis, Teucrium chamaedrys, Aegilops geniculate, Asperula hirsuta, Bromus madritensis, Cirsium acaule, Convolvulus lineatus, Coronilla minima, Crataegus lacinata
Bloc 5F15T187, T173, T164, T178Cytisus balansae, Euphorbia niceensis, Alyssum spinosum, Hirschfeldia incana, Anthyllis vulneraria Arthemisia herba alba Buxus balearica, Cirsium dyris, Coronilla minima, Delphinium gracile, Helianthemum apenninum, Juniperus thurifera, Jurinea humilis, Ormenis scariosa, Quercus ilex, Scorzonera caespitosa
F16T163, T167, T185, T165Arthemisia herba alba, Ormenis scariosa,
Euphorbia niceensis, Sanguisorba minor, Alyssum spinosum, Asperula cynanchica, Avena barbata, Bupleurum spinosum, Coronilla minima, Erinacea Anthyllis, Helianthemum cinereum, Hieracium pseudopilosella, Vella maierii
F17T172, T188, T181, T189Euphorbia nicaeensis, Ribes uva-crispa, Coronilla minima, Erinacea Anthyllis, Alyssum serpyllifolium, Buxus balearica; Cytisus balansae, Juniperus thurifera, Raffenaldia platycarpa, Scorzonera angustifolia, Scorzonera caespitosa, Thymelaea virgata
Bloc 6F18T179, T171, T184Alyssum spinosum, Scorzonera caespitosa,
Thymus pallidus, Arenaria pungens, Carduncellus atractyloides, Centaurea takredensis, Convolvulus sabatius, Delphinium gracile, Erinacea Anthyllis, Euphorbia niceensis, Euphorbia sagitalis, Juniperus thurifera
F19T186, T191, T180, T177, T155, T152, T174Alyssum spinosum, Bupleurum spinosum, Carduncellus atractyloides, Centaurea takredensis, Cytisus balansae, Erinacea Anthyllis, Euphorbia nicaeensis, Vella maierii, Ribes uva-crispa, Arenaria serpyllifolia, Arenaria pungens, Berberis vulgaris, Bupleurum atlanticum, Cirsium dyris, Delphinium gracile, Juniperus thurifera, Minuartia funkii, Ormenis scariosa, Prunus prostrata, Rahmnus liscoides, Thymus pallidus
F20T183, T153, T168Euphorbia nicaeensis, Alyssum spinosum
Erinacea Anthyllis, Juniperus thurifera,
Scorzonera caespitosa, Vella mairei, Arthemisia herba alba, Bupleurum, atlanticum, Bupleurum spinosum, Convolvulus lineatus,
Ormenis scariosa
F21T176, T154, T182, T170, T157, T192, T156Arenaria pungens, Valla mairei, Alyssum spinosum, Erinacea Anthyllis, Bupleurum spinosum, Clinopodium alpinum, Cytisus balansae, Euphorbia niceensis, Euphorbia megatlantica, Scorzonera caespitosa, Berberis vulgaris, Coronilla minima, Ormenis scariosa, Papaver atlanticum, Ruta montana, Stipa nitans
Table 3. Ecological synthesis of the main formation in the M’Goun Geopark the High Atlas of Morocco.
Table 3. Ecological synthesis of the main formation in the M’Goun Geopark the High Atlas of Morocco.
HabitatElevation (m)Tmin (°C)Tmax (°C)Precipitation (mm)BioclimateClimatic VariationVegetation Zone
Euphorbia resiniferaUp to 18008.05–9.0621.69–22.13305.13–552.85Semi-arid and subhumidModerate and coldMeso-Mediterranean
Juniperus phoeniceaUp to 20006.92–7.8819.95–20.56313.2–571.99Semi-arid and subhumidVery cold and coldMeso- and Thermo-Mediterranean
Chamaerops humilisUp to 20006.62–7.6920.98–21.43302.59–545.73Subhumid and semi-aridColdSupra-Mediterranean
Pinus halepensisUp to 22006.29–7.3619.13–19.72278.23–501.08Subhumid and semi-aridCool and coldSupra- and Meso-Mediterranean
Quercus ilexUp to 28005.61–6.2618.69–19.33299.01–548.25Semi-arid and subhumidAll variantsSupra-, Meso-, Thermo-, and Montane Mediterranean
Juniperus thuriferaUp to 27003.41–4.4216.26–16.98288.48–499.47Subhumid and semi-aridCold and very coldMontane Mediterranean
Buxus sempervirensUp to 30001.99–2.9314.9–15.51281.61–478.13Subhumid and semi-aridCold and very coldMontane Mediterranean
XerophytesUp to 37002.24–3.2615.14–15.79291.93–532.19Subhumid and semi-aridCold and very coldMontane and Oro-Mediterranean
Table 4. The specific richness (SR) according to vegetation levels.
Table 4. The specific richness (SR) according to vegetation levels.
BlocSRFormationVegetation LevelSR
B1233F1Meso-Mediterranean91
F2Meso-Mediterranean and Supra-Mediterranean176
F3Meso-Mediterranean and Supra-Mediterranean160
B2277F4Supra-Mediterranean91
F5Meso-Mediterranean114
F6Thermo- Mediterranean172
F7Meso-Mediterranean134
B3168F8Meso-Mediterranean64
F9Meso-Mediterranean31
F10Meso-Mediterranean91
F11Meso-Mediterranean111
B4119F12Supra-Mediterranean and Montane Mediterranean53
F13Montane Mediterranean41
F14Supra-Mediterranean and Montane Mediterranean69
B586F15Montane Mediterranean42
F16Montane Mediterranean42
F17Montane Mediterranean 57
B691F18Oro-Mediterranean 27
F19Oro-Mediterranean57
F20Oro-Mediterranean18
F21Oro-Mediterranean53
Table 5. Detailed ecological characteristics of vegetation formations in the Geopark M’Goun.
Table 5. Detailed ecological characteristics of vegetation formations in the Geopark M’Goun.
SymbolDominant SpeciesCompanion SpeciesElevationBioclimatic StageVegetation ZoneTmin and TmaxPrecipitationSubstrate
Type
F1Quercus ilex, Anchusa azurea, Astragalus incanusBromus madritensis, Campanula filicaulis, Catananche caerulea1100–1500Semi-arid fresh Meso-Mediterranean0 °C, 32 °C400–600 mmLimestones
F2Galium tricornicum, Quercus ilex, Anchusa azureaBromus madritensis, Medicago minima, Silene vulgaris1100–1800Semi-arid cold and sub-humid coldMeso-Mediterranean Supra-Mediterranean−3 °C, 28 °C550–650 mmLimestones
F3Quercus ilex, Hordeum murinum, Asphodelus macrocarpusGalium tricornicum, Romulea bulbocodium, Anchusa azurea1100–1800Semi-arid cold and sub-humid coldMeso-Mediterranean Supra-Mediterranean−3 °C, 30 °C550–650 mmLimestones
F4Quercus ilex, Clematis cirrhosa, Echinops spinosissimusArtemisia herba-alba, Juniperus phoenicea1500–1800Semi-arid, coldSupra-Mediterranean−3 °C, 30 °C550–600 mmLimestones
F5Juniperus phoenicea, Anchusa azurea, Quercus ilexSilene vulgaris, Avena fatua, Dactylis glomerata1100–1500Semi-arid fresh and Sub-humid freshMeso-Mediterranean0 °C, 32 °C600–650 mmLimestones
F6Juniperus phoenicea, Stipellula capensis, Chamaerops humilisAtractylis cancellata, Euphorbia resinifera544–1100Semi-arid fresh and Sub-humid freshThermo- Mediterranean5 °C, 34 °C600–650 mmClays and sandstone
F7Juniperus phoenicea, Pinus halepensis, Buxus balearicaThymus algeriensis, Lactuca tenerrima, Genista scorpius1400–1500Semi-arid fresh and Sub-humid freshMeso-Mediterranean and0 °C, 30 °C550–650 mmClays and limestone conglomerates
F8Pinus halepensis, Globularia nainii, Buxus balearicaCentaurea melitensis, Cistus creticus, Euphorbia niceensis1400–1500Semi-arid fresh and Sub-humid freshMeso-Mediterranean and0 °C, 30 °C550–650 mmClays and limestone
F9Thymus zygis, Anarrhinum fruticosum, Globularia nainiiArbutus unedo, Astragalus incanus, Ononis pusilla1400–1500Semi-arid fresh and Sub-humid freshMeso-Mediterranean0 °C, 32 °C600–650 mmLimestones and rocky limestones
F10Juniperus phoenicea, Xanthium spinosus, Ajuga ivaCapparis spinosa, Crambe filiformis, Nerium oleander1500–1800Semi-arid fresh and Sub-humid freshMeso-Mediterranean 0 °C, 32 °C600–650 mmClays and sandstones
F11Globularia nainii, Hirschfeldia incana, Lythrum junceumPinus halepensis, Polygala balansae, Teucrium polium1500–1800Semi-arid fresh and Sub-humid freshMeso-Mediterranean0 °C, 32 °C600–650 mmClays
F12Euphorbia niceensis, Fraxinus angustifolia, Polycarpon tetraphyllumBellis annua, Lactuca tenerrima, Quercus ilex1700–2350Semi-arid cold and very coldSupra-Mediterranean and Montane Mediterranean−6 °C, 28 °C500–600 mmLimestones
F13Teucrium chamaedrys, Alyssum spinosum, Polycarpon tetraphyllumArenaria pungens, Bupleurum spinosus, Cerastium arvense1800–2350Semi-arid cold and very coldMontane Mediterranean−6 °C, 28 °C400–450 mmLimestones, marls, and dolomites
F14Quercus ilex, Astragalus granatensis, Campanula filicaulisOnonis spinosa, Polycarpon tetraphyllum, Teucrium chamaedrys1700–2350Semi-arid cold, very cold, and Sub-humid coldSupra-Mediterranean and Montane Mediterranean−6 °C, 28 °C600–650 mmLimestones
F15Cytisus balansae, Euphorbia nicaeensis, Alyssum spinosumHirschfeldia incana, Cirsium dyris, Coronilla minima2200–2350Semi-arid cold and very coldMontane Mediterranean−6 °C, 28 °C400–600 mmLimestones
F16Artemisia herba-alba, Ormenis scariosa, Euphorbia niceensisSanguisorba minor, Alyssum spinosum, Bupleurum spinosus2200–2350Semi-arid cold and very coldMontane Mediterranean−6 °C, 28 °C400–600 mmLimestones
F17Euphorbia niceensis, Ribes uva-crispa, Coronilla minimaErinacea anthyllis, Alyssum serpyllifolium, Juniperus thurifera2000–2350Semi-arid cold and very coldMontane Mediterranean−6 °C, 28 °C400–600 mmLimestones
F18Alyssum spinosum, Scorzonera caespitosa, Thymus pallidusArenaria pungens, Carduncellus atractyloides, Euphorbia niceensis2200–2350Semi-arid cold and very coldMontane Mediterranean−6 °C, 28 °C400–600 mmLimestones
F19Alyssum spinosum, Bupleurum spinosum, Carduncellus atractyloidesCytisus balansae, Erinacea anthyllis, Euphorbia niceensis2350–2800Sub-humid is extremely cold and Semi-arid extremely coldOro-Mediterranean−9 °C, 24 °C550–650 mmLimestones
F20Euphorbia niceensis, Alyssum spinosum, Erinacea anthyllisJuniperus thurifera, Vella mairii, Ormenis scariosa2350–2800Sub-humid is extremely cold and Semi-arid is extremely coldOro-Mediterranean−9 °C, 24 °C550–650 mmLimestones
F21Arenaria pungens, Vella mairii, Alyssum spinosumErinacea anthyllis, Bupleurum spinosum, Cytisus balansae2350–2800Sub-humid is extremely cold and Semi-arid is extremely coldOro-Mediterranean−9 °C, 24 °C550–650 mmLimestones
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Outourakhte, A.; Gharnit, Y.; Moujane, A.; El Haddany, K.; Hasib, A.; Boulli, A. The Floristic Composition and Phytoecological Characterization of Plant Communities in the M’Goun Geopark, High Atlas, Morocco. Ecologies 2025, 6, 29. https://doi.org/10.3390/ecologies6020029

AMA Style

Outourakhte A, Gharnit Y, Moujane A, El Haddany K, Hasib A, Boulli A. The Floristic Composition and Phytoecological Characterization of Plant Communities in the M’Goun Geopark, High Atlas, Morocco. Ecologies. 2025; 6(2):29. https://doi.org/10.3390/ecologies6020029

Chicago/Turabian Style

Outourakhte, Aboubakre, Youssef Gharnit, Abdelaziz Moujane, Khalid El Haddany, Aziz Hasib, and Abdelali Boulli. 2025. "The Floristic Composition and Phytoecological Characterization of Plant Communities in the M’Goun Geopark, High Atlas, Morocco" Ecologies 6, no. 2: 29. https://doi.org/10.3390/ecologies6020029

APA Style

Outourakhte, A., Gharnit, Y., Moujane, A., El Haddany, K., Hasib, A., & Boulli, A. (2025). The Floristic Composition and Phytoecological Characterization of Plant Communities in the M’Goun Geopark, High Atlas, Morocco. Ecologies, 6(2), 29. https://doi.org/10.3390/ecologies6020029

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop