1. Introduction
The energy industry worldwide is going through a substantial transformation due to the necessity of tackling issues related to climate change and energy security. As societies confront the constraints of fossil fuel resources and their impact on the environment, the shift to renewable energy sources has become more than just a strategic choice—it is now a crucial necessity. Solar power is distinguished among renewable energy sources for its plentifulness, adaptability, and rapidly decreasing cost. Utilizing solar power in energy grids has the potential to significantly reduce greenhouse gas emissions and mitigate the effects of climate change, offering a sustainable solution to the world’s energy needs [
1,
2,
3,
4].
Solar–hydrogen systems have the capability to maximize the utilization of solar energy. By using PVs (Photovoltaics) cells to transform sunlight into electricity, these systems can produce hydrogen through electrolysis, a process that separates water into hydrogen and oxygen using electricity. This hydrogen can be stored and utilized as a clean energy source, addressing the issue of unreliability in renewable energy [
5,
6,
7,
8]. Solar power generation is naturally unpredictable, relying on elements like the time of day, weather patterns, and seasonal fluctuations. Hydrogen serves as a buffer, allowing for the storage of extra solar energy to be used at a later time when production does not match consumption. This dual-purpose capability enhances energy reliability and provides a sustainable method for reducing reliance on fossil fuels [
9,
10].
Although solar–hydrogen systems offer many benefits, effectively running them poses significant obstacles. Various factors such as environmental conditions, system design, and operational strategies impact the performance of these systems. Changes in energy requirements and availability lead to complications that call for advanced energy management techniques [
11,
12,
13]. Conventional methods of energy management frequently fail to adequately handle these intricate issues, especially in time-sensitive situations that require quick decision-making. Therefore, it is crucial to develop innovative methods that can merge the capabilities of real-time data analysis and forecasting to improve the effectiveness and reliability of solar–hydrogen systems [
14,
15,
16,
17]. In recent times, there has been substantial advancement in artificial intelligence, particularly with regard to deep learning, which has proven to be a valuable tool for addressing these challenges [
18,
19,
20,
21]. MobileNetV2 and InceptionV3, among other deep learning algorithms, have shown outstanding results in different fields like image categorization and in predicting time series. These models excel at handling large datasets and understanding intricate patterns, making them ideal for use in renewable energy systems. By utilizing these models, we can utilize the extensive datasets produced by solar–hydrogen systems to forecast energy needs, improve operational efficiency, and boost system reliability as a whole [
22,
23,
24,
25].
The transition to renewable energy sources is a critical component of addressing global energy challenges, particularly in the context of climate change and sustainability. However, this transition is fraught with numerous challenges, especially in the integration and management of variable renewable energy (VRE) sources such as solar and wind power. Deep learning (DL) and other advanced machine learning techniques have shown significant promise in addressing these challenges by improving forecasting accuracy, optimizing energy management, and enhancing system reliability. The integration of renewable energy sources into existing power grids presents several challenges, including the intermittent and unpredictable nature of these energy sources. For instance, solar and wind energy generation can vary significantly due to weather conditions, making it difficult to maintain a stable and reliable power supply. Additionally, the complexity of managing energy flows increases with the integration of multiple renewable sources, necessitating advanced control and optimization techniques [
26,
27].
Deep learning has emerged as a powerful tool for addressing the complexities of renewable energy management. Various DL-based approaches have been developed to improve the forecasting of solar and wind energy generation, system scheduling, and grid management. For example, deep reinforcement learning (DRL) has been applied to optimize the control policies for renewable power systems, demonstrating significant improvements in performance and cost reduction. Moreover, hybrid DL techniques, which combine multiple learning methods, have shown superior performance in handling large datasets and improving prediction accuracy [
28,
29].
Quantitative data are essential to support the transition to renewable energy, particularly when demonstrating the effectiveness of DL applications. Studies have shown that DL techniques can achieve up to 20% performance improvement in energy management tasks compared to traditional methods [
30]. In the context of solar–hydrogen systems, DL-driven optimization has been shown to reduce operational costs by up to 89.1% compared to conventional battery energy storage systems [
31]. These data points underscore the potential of DL in enhancing the efficiency and reliability of renewable energy systems.
The implementation of ISO 50001:2018, an international standard for energy management systems, in universities can lead to significant energy savings and operational efficiencies. Case studies from various universities have demonstrated the quantifiable benefits of adopting this standard. For instance, universities that have implemented ISO 50001:2018 have reported energy savings of up to 15% and a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions [
32]. These case studies highlight the practical benefits and the importance of adopting standardized energy management practices in educational institutions.
The selection of specific deep learning models, such as MobileNetV2 and InceptionV3, requires a strong justification based on comparative analysis with other available models. MobileNetV2 and InceptionV3 are known for their efficiency and accuracy in handling large-scale image data, making them suitable for applications in energy management where high-resolution data from sensors and imaging devices are used [
33,
34]. Comparative studies have shown that these models outperform other architectures in terms of computational efficiency and prediction accuracy, making them ideal choices for real-time energy management applications [
35].
This research is motivated by both the necessity for enhanced energy management in solar–hydrogen systems and the possibility of deep learning techniques offering new solutions. Incorporating cutting-edge deep learning techniques into existing energy management systems like ISO 50001:2018 can provide a chance to develop a more effective and resilient operational model. ISO 50001:2018 offers a thorough structure for EnMS, emphasizing systematic methods to enhance energy efficiency and lower consumption [
36,
37,
38,
39]. By combining deep learning abilities with the guidelines specified in ISO 50001:2018, we can guarantee that energy management procedures are both effective and environmentally friendly. One primary objective of this study is to evaluate how MobileNetV2 and InceptionV3 can enhance the effectiveness of solar–hydrogen systems. This evaluation involves assessing the models’ capability to forecast energy use, identify operational problems, and enhance strategic operations instantly. MobileNetV2 is created for mobile and embedded vision tasks, providing a compact design for fast processing and effective use of resources. On the other hand, InceptionV3, which is known for its intricate design, outperforms it in terms of precision and is especially efficient when dealing with substantial amounts of data. Our goal is to determine the most efficient methods for incorporating deep learning into the management of solar–hydrogen systems by comparing the performances of different models.
This study aims to explore how ISO 50001:2018 can help improve energy management in solar–hydrogen systems, in addition to assessing deep learning models. ISO 50001 stresses the significance of setting up a structured system to monitor and enhance energy efficiency. It offers a methodical strategy involving identifying EnPIs, conducting audits, and ongoing improvement processes. By incorporating deep learning models into this system, we can improve the decision-making process, enabling quicker reactions to changing energy needs and environmental situations.
An important part of our study involves presenting a thorough integration framework that merges deep learning techniques with the concepts of ISO 50001:2018. This framework aims to make the exchange of data between energy management processes and machine learning models smoother, ultimately boosting the overall efficiency and sustainability of solar–hydrogen systems. Through establishing a loop of feedback in which current data influence predictive models, and the predictions help to inform energy management choices, we can enhance the efficiency of these systems in a flexible way. The goals of this study can be outlined as follows:
Assess the efficiency of MobileNetV2 and InceptionV3 in predicting energy needs and detecting irregularities in solar–hydrogen systems. This will require comparing model performance in terms of accuracy, processing speed, and applicability for real-time use.
Study energy-management guidelines: Explore the impact of ISO 50001:2018 on energy-management methods in solar–hydrogen systems. This involves evaluating how the standard can be successfully combined with machine learning strategies to improve energy efficiency.
Suggest an Integrated Framework: Create a thorough framework that merges deep learning techniques with ISO 50001:2018 guidelines to enhance the operational efficiency of solar–hydrogen systems. This structure will prioritize creating a feedback system that uses up-to-date information to guide decision-making processes.
Encourage sustainability: Emphasize the opportunity for this holistic method to support wider sustainability objectives, illustrating how smart energy management can result in lower carbon emissions and enhanced resource efficiency.
This research seeks to tackle the difficulties encountered by solar–hydrogen systems by connecting advanced machine-learning methods with established energy management frameworks [
40,
41,
42,
43,
44,
45,
46,
47]. This study leverages open-source AI architectures, specifically MobileNetV2 and InceptionV3, as core components of the proposed fault detection system. The use of open-source models offers several advantages, including accessibility, cost-effectiveness, and reproducibility. These models allow for easy replication and adaptation by other researchers and institutions without the constraints of licensing fees, supporting the development of scalable and widely applicable solutions. By emphasizing open-source tools, our approach promotes transparency and fosters collaboration in the field, facilitating advancements in solar panel fault detection and sustainable energy management. Combining MobileNetV2 and InceptionV3 with ISO 50001:2018 provides a distinct chance to develop more intelligent, effective renewable energy setups.
AI refers to the simulation of human intelligence in machines, enabling them to perform tasks such as learning, reasoning, and problem-solving. On the other hand, AIoT represents the integration of AI (artificial intelligence) technologies with the Internet of Things (IoT), where interconnected devices utilize AI (artificial intelligence) capabilities to analyze data and make intelligent decisions in real time. This distinction is crucial, as it underscores how AI (artificial intelligence) serves as the foundational technology that empowers IoT devices to operate more autonomously and efficiently. By elaborating on this differentiation, we aim to provide a clearer understanding of the roles of both AI (artificial intelligence) and AIoT (artificial intelligence of things) in our research, particularly in the context of advancing solar panel fault detection and management.
This research aims to offer knowledge that can encourage more widespread use of similar integrated methods in the renewable energy industry, thus promoting a more sustainable energy future. Embracing new solutions that utilize advanced technologies will be crucial in achieving sustainability goals as the world faces the challenges of the energy transition. The combination of deep learning and energy management guidelines offers an effective way to improve solar–hydrogen systems, improve their performance, and support global initiatives to address climate change. This study seeks to enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of renewable energy solutions by improving the performance of solar–hydrogen systems and encouraging further exploration of the technology’s potential.
4. Results and Discussion
4.1. Design of Energy Management System Standard, Organization Structure and Regulations in University
Customizing ISO 50001:2018 to develop an Energy Management System (EnMS) standard for universities involves tailoring the widely recognized structure to meet the specific energy management needs of educational institutions. The initial step in this approach is to have a deep understanding of the university’s energy context, which includes its infrastructure, stakeholders, and sustainability goals. In order to guarantee successful execution, it is crucial to establish a diverse energy management team and obtain commitments from leadership. These methods provide the necessary assistance and expertise. By carrying out a gap analysis, universities can identify areas needing improvement and set specific objectives aligned with the principles of ISO 50001:2018. Developing an energy policy involving stakeholders is essential for driving energy efficiency initiatives and achieving the set goals. The standard’s operational basis is the execution of processes, which involve monitoring, measuring, and ongoing enhancement following the PDCA cycle. Employee awareness and training programs promote a culture of sustainability and energy conservation, while comprehensive record-keeping and documentation ensure accountability and transparency. Seeking external accreditation to ISO 50001:2018 standards can enhance the university’s reputation as a leader in sustainability within the higher education industry and demonstrate its commitment to efficient energy management. In order for universities to align with the unique requirements of academic institutions, it is essential to take several important steps to ensure the effectiveness of the Energy Management System (EnMS) standard based on ISO 50001:2018 (
Table 11).
It is important to create a hierarchy in line with ISO 50001:2018’s leadership commitment, continuous improvement, and systematic energy management principles to integrate it into a university’s structure. The university’s top executives oversee the energy strategy, allocate funding, and supervise energy management programs. Underneath them, there is a dedicated Energy Management Team that guides ongoing improvement efforts and oversees the implementation of the Energy Management System (EnMS). This team consists of individuals from academic departments, sustainability offices, and facilities management. Facilities management departments must prioritize energy-saving measures and adhere to energy management processes, while sustainability offices oversee broader sustainability policies and initiatives. Academic departments play a role in improving energy efficiency through research, education, and collaborative work across disciplines. Encouraging sustainable practices involves engaging students, and partnering with external stakeholders provides additional support and resources. By integrating ISO 50001:2018 principles into their organizational framework, academic institutions can successfully handle energy resources, reduce their impact on the environment, and achieve sustainability objectives (
Figure 3).
Before introducing ISO 50001:2018, it is essential to thoroughly examine and adjust a university’s organizational structure to align with its existing administrative hierarchies. The guideline highlights the significance of leadership engagement and dedication to energy management techniques. Therefore, the typical components included when integrating ISO 50001:2018 (
Figure 1) into the university’s organizational structure are as follows:
Management at the highest level, which includes individuals like the president, chancellor, vice-chancellor, or dean, plays a significant role in determining the strategic path for energy management at universities. Their duties involve endorsing the energy policy, allocating funds, and showing a firm dedication to implementing ISO 50001:2018.
Energy Management Team: It is necessary to form a dedicated Energy Management Team composed of members from various university departments and fields. The interdisciplinary team is in charge of implementing and overseeing the Energy Management System (EnMS), ensuring its integration into the university’s operations, and leading initiatives for continual improvement.
Facilities Management: The department responsible for facilities management typically oversees the daily maintenance and operation of university infrastructure and buildings. This department is crucial in carrying out energy-saving initiatives, conducting energy audits, and ensuring compliance with energy management procedures under ISO 50001:2018.
Sustainability Offices: The promotion of sustainable practices and advancement of environmental initiatives is the duty of specialized sustainability offices or departments in many universities. These offices often take the lead in implementing ISO 50001:2018 and work closely with other departments to incorporate energy management into broader sustainability plans and programs.
Academic departments and faculties can contribute to energy management efforts through research, teaching, and awareness campaigns. They may explore energy-saving technology, integrate energy-focused topics into their curriculum, and collaborate with different departments on interdisciplinary projects to reduce energy consumption.
Get students involved in energy management programs to promote a sustainable campus culture. Student-led organizations advocating for energy conservation, such as sustainability committees and environmental clubs, have the opportunity to collaborate with the administration on energy initiatives and promote awareness through campaigns.
External parties such as energy providers, government bodies, and community organizations can collaborate with universities to enhance energy management efforts. By utilizing these connections, it is possible to gain access to financial opportunities, resources, and knowledge, which can help in implementing ISO 50001:2018 and reaching energy efficiency goals.
Academic institutions can effectively adopt ISO 50001:2018, achieve energy efficiency objectives, and uphold broader sustainability aims through clearly outlining responsibilities in university policies and ensuring accountability across all tiers.
Incorporating ISO 50001:2018 concepts and requirements into university energy management policies and processes is essential to align university legislation with the standard’s requirements. In order to achieve this, the university needs to create an energy policy that demonstrates their dedication to sustainability and energy efficiency, aligned with ISO 50001:2018. According to the university regulations, departments like sustainability offices and facilities management are in charge of implementing the Energy Management System (EnMS) as specified in the standard. These guidelines specify the criteria for meeting ISO 50001:2018 by performing regular energy audits and recording energy efficiency. Additionally, staff, instructors, and students must engage in training programs to enhance their understanding of energy management techniques. Monitoring and reporting systems track the progress of energy efficiency goals, while documentation and record-keeping protocols ensure transparency and accountability. Incorporating ISO 50001:2018 into university regulations means integrating the standard’s principles and requirements into the school’s energy management policies, procedures, and guidelines. University guidelines regarding ISO 50001:2018 typically address several crucial areas (
Table 12).
4.2. Fault Detection Performance
Before delving into the specific performance metrics of the fault detection methods employed, it is important to highlight the significance of the computing environment that supports our deep learning models. The effectiveness of these models in identifying faults in solar panels hinges not only on their architecture but also on the computational resources at their disposal.
Table 13 presents the key specifications of the computing equipment utilized in this study, designed to meet the intensive requirements of our analytical processes.
This computing setup, featuring a powerful 13th Gen Intel Core i9 processor and 32 GB of RAM, provides the necessary computational resources to handle the higher demands of the InceptionV3 model effectively. Utilizing online platforms like Kaggle further enhances our capability to leverage cloud-based resources for training and testing our models, ensuring optimal performance in our deep learning tasks. Additionally, software tools like OpenCV and Pandas are employed to assist in dataset creation, preprocessing, and analysis, facilitating the development of a robust and reliable dataset for model training.
Decreased energy generation is caused by the buildup of trash on solar panels, such as dust, snow, bird droppings, and other debris. This decreases the panels’ ability to convert sunlight into energy. Regular monitoring and cleaning are essential in order to maintain the efficiency of solar panels. It is important to have a methodical process for monitoring and cleaning in order to maximize resource utilization, reduce maintenance expenses, and improve panel efficiency. Having a carefully organized schedule for checking and maintaining solar panels can help owners optimize energy generation, prolong panel life, and support overall sustainability objectives. This dataset aims to evaluate the effectiveness of various machine-learning classifiers in identifying dust, snow, bird droppings, and mechanical and electrical issues on solar panels. The dataset for classification contains six class folders: bird drop, clean, snow-covered, bird drop, dusty and physical damage (
Figure 4). A slight discrepancy in the number of photos collected is present due to sourcing data from the internet. Multiple steps are required in the data verification process to guarantee the quality and integrity of the dataset used to train a machine learning model. Getting the data ready for training involves carrying out preprocessing tasks like cleansing, standardization, and feature creation. Reviewing the preprocessed data is crucial to identify anomalies, inconsistencies, or missing variables that may impact the model’s performance. This can involve creating visuals such as plots or graphs to detect patterns or outliers in the data. Furthermore, it is crucial to address class imbalances in order to reduce possible biases in the model caused by overrepresentation or underrepresentation of certain classes.
Splitting the dataset into training and validation sets is essential for assessing the model’s performance on new data. Allowing the use of cross-validation procedures ensures the strength and adaptability of the model. Sustaining the model’s precision and efficiency in the long term also necessitates on consistent monitoring and revising of the training data as new data arises. By closely examining the training data, machine learning practitioners can develop more precise and reliable models for a range of uses, such as detecting faults in solar panels.
The performance of the two deep learning architectures, MobileNetV2 and InceptionV3, when applied to detect defects in solar panel images, shows noticeable differences. The results (as shown in
Figure 5) indicate the relative strengths and weaknesses of both models in terms of accuracy and loss value.
MobileNetV2 Performance: The MobileNetV2 model achieved an accuracy of 80% with a loss value of 55%. While this is a respectable performance, especially considering the model’s lightweight nature and suitability for resource-constrained environments, it reveals that MobileNetV2 may struggle to capture the more complex features of solar panel defects. The higher loss value (55%) suggests that the model has room for improvement in minimizing prediction errors and refining its ability to differentiate between defective and non-defective panels. However, the trade-off in computational efficiency makes it a valuable choice for real-time applications where low power consumption is a priority.
InceptionV3 Performance: On the other hand, the InceptionV3 model demonstrated superior performance with an accuracy of 90% and a lower loss value of 48%. The increased accuracy indicates that InceptionV3 is more effective at identifying defects in solar panel images, likely due to its deeper and more complex architecture, which allows it to extract more intricate patterns from the data. Additionally, the lower loss value (48%) suggests better optimization and a more consistent ability to generalize across different solar panel images, reducing the likelihood of misclassification. InceptionV3′s higher computational complexity may make it more suitable for scenarios in which accuracy is a higher priority than computational efficiency.
The findings indicate that InceptionV3 outperforms in defect detection accuracy and loss reduction, but MobileNetV2 may be favored for tasks needing quicker, resource-efficient performance (
Figure 6). Choosing the right model necessitates consideration of the particular use case, requiring a trade-off between precision and computational speed.
In situations with high stakes in which even small errors could lead to major financial or operational impacts, InceptionV3 is the preferred option. In contrast, in situations where speed and resource efficiency are crucial, like in on-site monitoring systems with low computational power, MobileNetV2 provides a practical option despite its reduced accuracy (
Table 14).
Accuracy: InceptionV3 outperforms MobileNetV2 in terms of accuracy by a 10% margin, making it a more reliable model for defect detection tasks. This increased accuracy suggests that InceptionV3 can detect more subtle defects, improving the overall detection rate.
Loss Value: The lower loss value of InceptionV3 (48%) compared to MobileNetV2 (55%) reflects better performance in terms of minimizing prediction errors. This implies that InceptionV3 produces fewer misclassifications and has a more refined understanding of the data, leading to better generalization.
Computational Efficiency: Despite the higher performance of InceptionV3, MobileNetV2 remains a strong contender due to its computational efficiency. It requires fewer resources and has lower latency, which makes it suitable for real-time applications in environments where computational power is limited, such as embedded systems for monitoring solar panels in remote locations.
5. Future Prospects
5.1. Implications for Sustainability and Future Directions
The adoption of ISO 50001:2018 in academic institutions not only enhances energy management practices but also plays a pivotal role in fostering sustainability and environmental stewardship. By integrating these energy management standards, universities can align their operational strategies with broader environmental objectives, promoting a culture of sustainability within their communities. This integration creates a framework for continuous improvement in energy performance, facilitating the development and implementation of innovative strategies that minimize energy consumption and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Furthermore, by harnessing renewable energy sources, such as solar and hydrogen technologies, institutions can significantly contribute to achieving the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals, particularly SDG 7, which emphasizes the importance of sustainable energy access for all. Therefore, our research into hydrogen and solar–hydrogen systems aligns well with the principles of ISO 50001:2018, highlighting the potential for these technologies to transform energy management practices in academic settings and support the transition toward a more sustainable future.
Universities can support global sustainability objectives by reducing their carbon emissions, decreasing resource use, and addressing environmental impacts with strategic energy conservation methods. Furthermore, academic institutions can improve the energy performance and efficiency of all campus buildings by adopting ISO 50001:2018. Universities have the opportunity to enhance their energy efficiency and reduce operational costs by acknowledging the potential for energy conservation, setting specific objectives, and implementing energy-saving initiatives. This enhances economic sustainability and allows for more resources to be directed towards educational programs, research endeavors, and student support services. Furthermore, the university’s commitment to the best energy management practices is demonstrated by its ISO 50001:2018 certification, which also adds credibility to the institution. By boosting the university’s reputation as a leader in sustainability within the higher education sector, it attracts prospective students, faculty, and funding prospects. Additionally, accreditation could result in collaborations with government entities, business groups, and other supporters of sustainability and energy initiatives.
Over time, the implementation of ISO 50001:2018 sets the stage for ongoing progress and innovation in the energy management sector. Universities can adapt to evolving energy technologies, legal obligations, and sustainability trends through implementing ongoing enhancement. This involves researching sustainable energy sources, such as implementing intelligent technology for managing and monitoring energy, and developing creative energy solutions. Furthermore, ISO 50001:2018 provides academic institutions with an opportunity to address broader sustainability concerns beyond energy management alone. It advocates for implementing sustainable practices in waste management, procurement, transportation, and curriculum development, as well as other aspects of university operations. Students are equipped with the knowledge and skills needed to emerge as future leaders in sustainability across a range of fields and industries using a comprehensive approach to sustainability. Ultimately, the adoption of ISO 50001:2018 within the higher education sector will have important implications for sustainability and forthcoming pathways. Universities can reduce their environmental impact, boost their financial stability, enhance their reputation, foster innovation, and prepare students to address complex sustainability challenges in the future.
5.2. Solar Fault Detection for an AIoT-Based Solar–Hydrogen System at a University
Solar–hydrogen systems, which integrate solar power generation with hydrogen production and storage, provide hopeful solutions for sustainable energy control. Yet, a significant hurdle in implementing these systems in institutions such as universities is concerns about the dependability and effectiveness of solar panels. Issues with solar panels, such as shading, soiling, or physical harm, can result in notable decreases in energy output. It is crucial to quickly and accurately identify these faults in order to uphold system performance and enhance energy conversion. AIoT solutions combine artificial intelligence with IoT sensors and devices to offer an innovative way to monitor and detect faults in solar–hydrogen systems in real time.
The incorporation of AIoT in solar–hydrogen setups allows for ongoing supervision of solar panel activity via multiple sensors that gather information like temperature, voltage, current, and irradiance. Next, the information undergoes analysis with advanced deep learning algorithms such as MobileNetV2 and InceptionV3 to identify irregularities and possible malfunctions. AI algorithms are able to predict and classify faults by analyzing historical and real-time data and can also set off maintenance alarms. Using AIoT allows for early fault detection, decreasing downtime and enhancing energy efficiency. Some of the types of faults (
Table 15) that can be detected in solar–hydrogen systems are listed below.
Shading: Partial shading of solar panels can significantly reduce energy output, and AI models can identify shading patterns based on data from sensors.
Soiling: Accumulation of dirt or dust on the panels can lead to decreased efficiency. AIoT systems detect performance drops associated with soiling.
Panel degradation: Long-term wear and tear of panels can result in performance degradation, which can be detected using trend analysis and predictive maintenance algorithms.
Electrical faults: These include issues like short circuits, grounding faults, or connection failures that affect the electrical performance of the system.
The incorporation of AIoT into solar–hydrogen systems at universities offers notable advantages. The use of deep learning models such as MobileNetV2 and InceptionV3 enables precise solar fault detection, ensuring timely identification of potential system performance risks (
Table 16). The lightweight design of the models allows for their efficient operation on edge devices, making them ideal for distributed systems at university campuses. In addition, universities can guarantee a dependable energy supply, extend the system’s lifespan, and lower operational expenses by stopping unnoticed faults from turning into significant issues that could affect solar infrastructure.
6. Conclusions
The research on solar fault detection in university-based solar–hydrogen systems, utilizing AIoT-enabled deep learning models, demonstrates significant advancements in energy management and fault detection efficiency. Customizing ISO 50001:2018 for universities offers a robust framework for developing Energy Management Systems (EnMS), promoting energy efficiency, and achieving sustainability goals. By aligning university operations with ISO 50001:2018’s principles, universities can structure their energy management efforts, with leadership commitment, multidisciplinary teams, and continuous improvement cycles ensuring the integration of energy-saving practices into daily activities. This framework establishes a clear organizational structure, with top management endorsing the energy policy, facilities management overseeing day-to-day operations, and sustainability offices driving broader initiatives. In the solar fault detection component, the comparison between MobileNetV2 and InceptionV3 offers insights into the trade-offs between accuracy and computational efficiency. MobileNetV2, which achieves 80% accuracy, is more suitable for real-time, resource-constrained environments due to its lightweight architecture. This makes it ideal for on-site monitoring systems, especially when a low amount of computational power is available. However, its higher loss value (55%) suggests that it has room for improvement in terms of accurately identifying complex defects. On the other hand, InceptionV3 achieved a superior 90% accuracy and lower loss value (48%), indicating better performance in detecting subtle defects and minimizing prediction errors. Its more complex architecture allows it to extract intricate patterns, making it more suitable for high-precision applications. However, InceptionV3’s higher computational demands mean it may be less appropriate for real-time, low-power environments, whereas it is ideal for centralized systems where accuracy is a priority. The overall findings highlight that the choice between MobileNetV2 and InceptionV3 depends on the specific application scenario. For real-time monitoring and resource-efficient environments, MobileNetV2 offers a practical solution. In contrast, InceptionV3 is better suited for high-stakes environments where accuracy and defect detection precision are critical.
By implementing ISO 50001:2018, this research thoroughly examines and analyzes energy management system standards, focusing on their relevance to implementing solar–hydrogen systems on university grounds. The research has highlighted the significant implications and potential benefits for colleges incorporating solar–hydrogen technologies by examining the basic concepts and requirements of ISO 50001:2018 in detail, as well as their practical application in academia. By using ISO 50001:2018, universities have the ability to establish structured systems to enhance sustainable practices, optimize energy efficiency, and encourage continuous improvements in energy management. This paper uses Kangwon National University Samcheok Campus as an example to show how organizational structures, rules, and best practices are important in implementing energy management system standards in academic institutions. Overall, this article provides important viewpoints and suggestions for educational institutions aiming to enhance their efforts in sustainable energy growth through the use of solar–hydrogen systems and through promoting environmental consciousness within the academic community using ISO 50001:2018.
The integration of deep learning models such as MobileNetV2 and InceptionV3 into university-based solar–hydrogen systems provides an effective means of enhancing energy management. While MobileNetV2 excels in computational efficiency, InceptionV3 achieves higher accuracy, making it essential to balance the demands of the specific use case with the strengths of each model. Through continuous improvement, adherence to ISO 50001:2018, and the adoption of AIoT-based monitoring, universities can maintain their energy systems’ operational efficiency and further their sustainability efforts.