Next Article in Journal
Chitosan Nanoparticles as Seed Priming Agents to Alleviate Salinity Stress in Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Seedlings
Previous Article in Journal
Application of Polysaccharide-Based Edible Coatings on Fruits and Vegetables: Improvement of Food Quality and Bioactivities
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Beyond Proteins—Edible Insects as a Source of Dietary Fiber

by
Carolyne Kipkoech
German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, Department of Safety in Food Chain, Unit Plant Toxins and Mycotoxins, Max-Dohrn-Str. 8-10, 10589 Berlin, Germany
Polysaccharides 2023, 4(2), 116-128; https://doi.org/10.3390/polysaccharides4020009
Submission received: 28 February 2023 / Revised: 23 March 2023 / Accepted: 26 March 2023 / Published: 12 April 2023

Abstract

:
The consumption of insects as an alternative protein source is acceptable as a sustainable alternative to mainstream protein sources. Apart from containing a high protein content, insects also have dietary fiber in the form of chitin, which helps to enrich gut microbiota. The importance of the gut microbiome in general health has recently been underlined for humans, farm animals, pets, poultry, and fish. The advances in 16S RNA techniques have enabled the examination of complex microbial communities in the gastrointestinal tract, shedding more light on the role of diet in disease and immunity. The gut microbiome generates signals influencing the normal nutritional status, immune functions, metabolism, disease, and well-being. The gut microbiome depends on dietary fiber; hence, their diversity is modulated by diet, a relevant factor in defining the composition of gut microbiota. Small shifts in diet have demonstrated an enormous shift in gut microbiota. Edible insects are an excellent source of protein, fat, and chitin that could influence the gut microbiota as a prebiotic. Chitin from insects, when consumed, contributes to a healthy gut microbiome by increasing diversity in fecal microbiota. Moreover, a high fiber intake has been associated with a reduced risk of breast cancer, diverticular disease, coronary heart disease, and metabolic syndrome. This review presents edible insects with a focus on fiber found in the insect as a beneficial food component.

1. Introduction

More than 2 billion people around the world are already consuming insects, directly or indirectly, making them an important part of diets. Most insects contain the essential nutrients required by humans and animals, which include fats, proteins, fiber, vitamins, and, in addition, minerals [1]. The nutrient composition of many edible insects is comparable to that of other traditionally consumed animal protein sources. Therefore, they may act as an alternative source to other mainstream animal protein sources such as chicken, beef, and fish. Relative to livestock, insects are a more sustainable and efficient food source, requiring minimum water and space [2]. The consumption of insects for food is a traditional practice in many societies, especially in Asia, Latin America, and Africa, and is common in low-income groups in these countries, often collected from the wild. By contrast, in most Western countries, people view entomophagy with disgust or even as culturally inappropriate; therefore, consumption is infrequent [3]. However, with greater awareness of the environmental footprint associated with the livestock industry and concerns around the sustainability of agriculture and the impacts of climate change on productive systems, there is an opportunity for using insects as an additional and healthy protein source. Currently, the use of insects as protein sources within the European Union has a legal basis [4], which has allowed many startup companies to engage in insect farming for pigs, poultry, and fish. Already, yellow mealworm is extensively farmed, and other insects such as crickets and grasshoppers may be farmed for human consumption. There is a possibility of increased consumption of insects, especially due to their potential to provide other uses beyond their nutritional benefits. The isolation of specific compounds that can be used as food supplements, the dietary fiber contained in insects, and their use as high-protein supplements in sports will likely increase the usage of edible insects [5,6].

2. Edible Insects

Most countries are currently embracing insect farming for pet food, poultry, pigs, and fish. The inclusion of edible insects in food production has the potential to benefit the environment and animal and human health by supplementing other animal-sourced proteins. This would help save resources such as land and water; reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and eventually address issues of food security [7]. Concerning nutrient composition, edible insects have a sufficient number of essential amino acids, fatty acids, fiber, vitamins, and minerals [8]. This is a suitable alternative to livestock, fish, and poultry and can replace fishmeal in animal feed as a more suitable and efficient protein source, often reared on organic waste [9].
The increased interest in agricultural resources and the decreasing ecological impact of food production have shown the consumption of insects rising at a global rate, and their farming for feed may offer a sustainable means of food production [10]. To satisfy the demand for sufficient insect quantities, farming insects is gaining fast momentum across the globe. Edible insects not only provide common nutrients but also bioactive substances such as chitin and antimicrobial peptides [6]. The nutritional profile of insects can be highly variable and depends on the insect species, the feed used, and the developmental stage [11]. Environmental factors can also affect their nutritional value, and this may include the day length, light intensity, temperature, and humidity [11]. Insects’ protein content varies between 12 and 70% (Table 1), they may be highly digestible, and their consumption may contribute to the total protein intake, enhancing nutritional quality in the human diet. Edible insects meet the daily energy and nutrient requirements, from their fat, amino acid, and mineral composition. The high amino acid content in insects and the presence of omega fatty acids allow them to act as dietary supplements that help alleviate disease [12]. Therefore, using edible insects may confer positive health implications.
The total fat content of insects ranges between 6 and 43% (Table 1) and is generally similar to that of animal fats and vegetable oil [12]. However, in comparison with beef and pork, insects are particularly rich in mono and polyunsaturated fatty acids. The high content of unsaturated fatty acids may be problematic due to oxidation during the handling and processing of insect products, and this may lead to a food safety risk. Processed food with high protein and fat contents is prone to spoilage due to oxidation [13]; hence, food products processed with whole insects as ingredients may fall into this category. If this is the case, defatting may be a solution to the high fat content and the obtained fat, used on its own or in combination with other products. Some insects contain phenols and flavonoids, which have antioxidative properties. Substantial levels of these compounds are seen in silkworm larvae, crickets, and grasshoppers [14].
Table 1. Nutrient content in edible insects approved within the EU according to the selected literature.
Table 1. Nutrient content in edible insects approved within the EU according to the selected literature.
Insect TypeProtein (%) Fat (%)Chitin (%) References
Mealworms16–4520–431–3[15,16,17,18]
Crickets15–477–291–12[16,19,20]
Grasshopper50–706–115–15[16,21]
Black soldier fly12–5511–293–15[17,18,22]
Although edible insects appear to be a valuable source of nutrients and bioactive compounds, some compounds are seen as antinutritive, such as chitin. Chitin is a source of dietary fiber obtained from the exoskeleton consisting of a long-chain polymer of N-acetyl-glucosamine. Chitin can be digested by humans, into a deacetylated form, chitosan, which is regarded as a functional food component [23] providing beneficial effects as an antimicrobial and an immune modulator in cholesterol reduction, wounds, and chronic disease healing [23]. Studies have shown that chitin has the potential to improve gastrointestinal health when gut microbiota ferment it [24]. It can also increase immune function by immune modulation, decreasing the risk of bacterial infection through antimicrobial effects, and reducing chronic inflammation that may be associated with cancer and cardiovascular disease [23,25]. Insect chitin, therefore, has great potential to improve human and animal gut health by regulating the gut microbiota as a dietary fiber.

2.1. Limitation of the Possible Widespread Use of Insects

Disgust and neophobia are limiting global acceptance of insects and their products [3]. Every new product faces some amount of resistance, and there is hope that, if the advantages of using edible insects will outweigh the disadvantages, then adoption will be achieved at some point. The addition of edible insects to products will greatly help reduce disgust since the consumer will reap the benefits of edible insects without having to see the insects themselves. The extensive use of edible insects is under development and is not yet widespread, especially in the colder geographic regions where insects are limited. Insects are very sensitive to temperature and humidity changes, and their rearing should ensure a well-maintained environment. Rearing insects in these regions will require specialized units that will enable climate control in unfavorable seasons. Often, these new technologies are expensive, limiting the widespread production of edible insects and leading to reduced use due to inaccessibility [26]. Currently, edible insects are therefore not available in many outlets, which is a limitation for new users who would desire to explore.
Inaccessibility does not only affect colder regions and the tropics, where insects are traditionally used, but its use is also limited to seasonality, and with the recent climate change occurrences, the swarming of edible insects cannot be predicted and hence cannot be included as a stable food [27]. This can be improved by the widespread farming of insects, although in the regions where people are collecting insects from the wild, there is a lack of knowledge and tools to be used for insect rearing [28]. When reared, insects have a short life span, which may hinder their use as long-term application tools. The tools and equipment used for raising insects have been fabricated for other uses and are therefore not food-grade material. The exact food safety risk posed by the use of this equipment has not been fully accessed, and this is yet another limitation. There is a need for complex and specialized training for personnel to handle insect rearing. The training can be expensive and time-consuming, requiring specialized knowledge and skills. Pioneer farmers have reported frequent colony collapse, which may be caused by an extensive lack of knowledge [29].
Another major setback involving the widespread use of edible insects is the limited number of edible insects that have been approved for human food. So far, grasshoppers/locusts, crickets, and yellow mealworms have been approved for production and use within the European Union [4]. The other limitation may be caused by the possible allergic reaction to insect products [30], through contact, consumption, or inhalation. Insects can cause allergic reactions that include itching skin, dizziness, and shock [31]. People who would like to explore edible insects should ensure that the insects are sourced from known, reputable sources and are well cooked to reduce the risks associated with foodborne illnesses [32]. When considering consuming insects, an individual with a history of allergy reactions from crustaceans or another protein source should be aware of possible allergic reactions from edible insects [33].
Like other protein sources, insects can carry harmful bacteria, viruses, toxins, and parasites [34]. These can cause foodborne illnesses, especially if the insects are not well-cooked. Depending on the rearing practices, insects can absorb and retain chemicals from the environment that may include heavy metals, pesticides, and other process contaminants [35]. The initial analysis carried out has shown that insects do not concentrate on these harmful substances [36], although there is a need for a complete risk assessment.

2.2. Possible Limitations of Insect Use within the European Union

Insect farming will require more insects to be killed to provide the required tones of insect proteins [35]. Currently, the large-scale production of insects is under development, and there is a knowledge gap on the humane extermination of insects during harvest; this in itself is a setback since the EU laws on the protection of animals kept for farm purposes do not include invertebrates and, in this case, edible insects [37]. There is a need for the inclusion of insects in the legal regulations, which is key to the expansion of insect farming and effective marketing [35].
Large-scale insect farming will likely promote the factory farming of insects instead of promoting more sustainable food systems, and the energy requirement for controlled insect breeding has not been quantified; therefore, its impact is still unknown. There is also a need for more research on insect welfare and the impact of large-scale production on the ecosystem. Edible insects have the opportunity to contribute to the circular economy [38] when insects are fed organic waste, although when they are fed low-quality food waste and straws, the live weight and nutrient quality are low, with high mortality rates [39]. Food safety is the cornerstone of the modern food industry and therefore important for EU legislation, and edible insects are no exception [35]. Currently, manure, catering wastes, and other wastes are not allowed as insect feed in the EU, and therefore, insects are likely to be fed commonly available animal feed and may end up not contributing much to the circular economy [35]. In third-world countries, black soldier flies have been fed organic waste [40,41] and sometimes sewage sludge [42,43]. Unfortunately, edible insects within these production systems cannot be traded in the EU, and therefore, there is a need for harmonized practices for better global trade in the edible insect industry. There may be an opportunity for edible insects to contribute to the circular economy in the EU if waste is redefined. Often, fruits and vegetables from outlets expire due to their perishable nature and are discarded. The need to look at the enormous quantities of vegetable leftovers in agriculture, in supermarkets, and in households as possible insect feed may better contribute to the circular economy.

3. Chitin and Chitosan as a Dietary Fiber

Dietary fibers are carbohydrates not digested in the body and can travel through the digestive system, helping the system to stay healthy [44]. The soluble dietary fiber can dissolve sugar and cholesterol, while the insoluble ones help in bulking and therefore facilitate better bowel movement [44]. Chitin is an abundant natural polymer with a structure almost similar to that of cellulose, while chitosan is the deacetylated form of chitin and is soluble in slightly acidic conditions [45]. Chitin is the main component of crustacean shells, insects’ exoskeletons, and the cell wall of fungi. The major source of chitin in the world is crustaceans’ shells, which usually accumulate as large waste and are a major concern of this industry [46]. The chitin content from crustaceans is enormous but is extracted before use, often using aggressive chemicals, while chitin from insects and some fungi is converted directly to chitosan (Figure 1).
Crustacean and insects chitin are cross-linked with proteins, while fungal chitin is associated with other polysaccharides such as glucans that are often in higher quantities than the chitin [47]. During extraction, the mycelial or fruiting bodies are used for fungal chitin extraction, the shells for crustaceans, and the pupae or whole insects for the extraction of chitin from edible insects [47]. Marine sources have the greatest potential for chitin yield, but sources are seasonal and limited due to climate change; moreover, the shells are also often exposed to infections and contaminations, which may affect the quality of chitin obtained [48]. Fungi is the second-largest source of chitin that has a commercial advantage as a vegan source of chitin and chitosan (Table 2). Some fungal species can be a source of chitosan directly without having to undergo deacetylation [49]. The widely studied species for direct chitosan production are Zygomycetes, Ascomycetes, and Basidiomycetes, although this has not been conducted on an industrial scale [49]. Insects are usually promoted due to their high protein and fat contents, and the addition of fiber is likely to increase the benefits of this novel food. Figure 1 outlines the major source of chitin; edible insect chitin can be consumed and deacetylated by the host enzymes. Edible insects contain varied amounts of chitin depending on the developmental stage [50]. The older the insect, the higher the chitin content. This has partly contributed to the increased interest in chitin and chitosan from farmed edible insects. More chitin and chitosan from exuviate can be obtained after the emergence of the adult from the pupae shell. This can provide additional chitin extraction material from the rearing of the black soldier fly, and this contributes to a circular economy [30].
Insects, when consumed whole, contain chitin that will act as dietary fiber both in humans and in animals. Industries in the domain of beneficial insect breeding are witnessing rapid growth, and the market estimation of edible insects for food and feed is estimated to increase, with the current estimation being that more than EUR 1 billion has been invested in the insect sector [51]. The importance of chitin and chitosan as food relates to their outcome as a dietary fiber and hence a functional ingredient, since chitosan is a novel food ingredient [52]. Chitosan is used as a food quality enhancer, and products containing chitosan are sold in Japan for their cholesterol-lowering ability [53]. Apart from its use in humans, chitin and chitosan have also been used in soil to improve plant health [54], to help improve growth in chicken [55], to improve immunity in fish [56], and to relieve pathogenic bacteria-induced retardant growth in pigs [57]. Table 2 highlights the three main sources of chitin and chitosan, depicting the advantages and disadvantages of each source according to the cited literature.
Table 2. Major chitin and chitosan sources.
Table 2. Major chitin and chitosan sources.
SourceAdvantagesDisadvantages Reference
Crustaceans
Content 16–49%
The highest content of chitin; hence, it is viable for industrial extractionLimited to seasonal and regional variations
High mineral content requiring aggressive extraction
Highly susceptible to heavy metal contaminants
[47,48]
Fungi
Content 1–29%
Possibility of the direct production of chitosan by some species
No seasonal variations
Can be produced by solid phase fermentation that can control for desired chitin/chitosan production
Important as a vegan source of chitin and chitosan
Consistent physiological and chemical properties
Limited availability and low content
Industrial production not widely established
[47,49,57,58,59]
Edible insects
Content 6–36%
Can be consumed directly
Can be produced all year round
Can be produced by bacterial fermentation
With industrial insect farming, chitin can be available as a cheap byproduct
Commercial production has not been established
The risk of allergic reactions has not been fully described
[47,58,60,61]
Chitin is a viscous dietary fiber that binds cholesterol, hence decreasing its absorption and leading to the excretion of excess cholesterol [45]. Chitin is non-digestible in the upper gastrointestinal tract, with high viscosity and high water binding capacity, while at the lower part of the gastrointestinal tract, it has low water holding capacity that helps in the effective reduction of cholesterol by the dietary fiber. The lower part of the gastrointestinal tract contains microorganisms that secrete chitinase, which can digest chitin, releasing bile acids and sterols that are excreted without absorption [45]. The production of short-chain fatty acid after the consumption of chitin has not been demonstrated in humans but has been demonstrated in poultry [62]. This study reported that a diet consisting of black soldier fly larvae affected the production of large intestinal microbiota and short-chain fatty acids in poultry [62]. This may have been due to the prebiotic potential of chitin that promotes the gut health and, subsequently, the overall health of the poultry. Additionally, the increase in butyric acid and short-chain fatty acids optimizes intestinal health and inhibits pathogenic bacteria [63].
The human gastrointestinal tract is home to a host of bacterial cells that are slightly higher in number than human cells [64]. The ideal number of bacteria in the gut has not been determined due to the huge diversity caused by genetic variability, the difference in diet, and health [65]. Research has demonstrated that microbiota in the human gut respond to nutritional changes [66,67,68]. When this happens, the microbiota generates signals that influence the normal nutritional status, metabolism, immune function, and disease progression, which greatly contribute to overall well-being [69,70,71]. In addition, there is a general agreement that healthy microbiota are associated with better health [72,73]. People suffering from obesity have a lower diversity of gut microbiota commonly known as dysbiosis [74]. Low microbial diversity is associated with chronic non-communicable diseases [75,76]. The diet is the most relevant factor in defining the composition of gut microbiota [77]; indigestible fiber is the primary energy source and can be fermented by the microbiota and hence acts as a prebiotic. A healthy diet leads to a more diverse and healthy microbiome [78,79]. The ability to maintain healthy microbiota is useful in activating the host’s immune system and other mechanisms that may constitute a new therapeutic strategy for preventing chronic disease.
Dysbiosis is a microbial imbalance in the body, leading to impaired microbiota, which is a commonly reported condition in the gastrointestinal tract, caused by small intestinal bacterial or fungal overgrowth. Normal microbial colonies are beneficial and help aid the digestion and synthesis of vitamins such as B3, B5, B6, B7, B9, B12, and vitamin K [80], which are involved in myriad aspects of the microbial and host metabolism. When there is a microbial imbalance, the microbes exhibit a decreased ability to check each other’s growth; this can cause the overgrowth of one of the disturbed microbes, which may damage beneficial ones in a vicious cycle [81]. Usually, microbial colonies excrete different types of waste that the body effectively manages, but oversized microbes excreta can cause negative outcomes. These may include pathogenic members taking hold of the gut environment [81]. Imbalances in the gut microbiota are associated with metabolic and non-communicable diseases, gastrointestinal conditions, allergies, asthma, and environmental enteric dysfunction (EED) [74]. Relationships between the diet, nutritional status, immune system, and microbial ecology are important as we look for new ways to feed healthy foods to a human population predicted to expand to 10 billion by 2050.
Gut health is determined by gut microbiota commonly called probiotics. Probiotics are living organisms that benefit the host when available in adequate amounts, though even dead bacteria and their products confer probiotics benefits [82]. Prebiotics are substances that can maintain normal gut microbiota when there is an imbalance; therefore, probiotics and prebiotics are dependent on each other. The most popular probiotics are the lactic acid bacteria that help in the fermentation of non-digestible polysaccharides [82].

Insect Chitin as a Prebiotic

The nutritional value of edible insects is well documented, as described above, but other potential benefits beyond protein and fat have not been widely documented. Studies have reported important biofunctional effects of various components of edible insects such as chitin, fat, and protein [83,84,85]. The biofunctional properties highlighted include antioxidant properties, anti-inflammatory microbial modulation, and cholesterol reduction ability [83]. The fermentation of prebiotics produces breakdown products such as short-chain fatty acids that enter the bloodstream and thus help other organs far from the digestive system [84]. A positive change in the composition and metabolic activity of the host gut is of great interest due to the important role of intestinal microflora in human health. Prebiotics can have positive effects on host organisms by selectively stimulating beneficial gut bacteria [85].
Chitin is fermented in the colon to form short-chain fatty acid that has a mild laxative [86] effect, although this has not been carried out in human studies. The beneficial effects of chitin and chitosan in fish poultry and pigs have been successfully tested, and clinical studies ascertaining these benefits in humans are limited, with some studies mimicking this effect in vitro [55,56,57]. The following table lists in vitro and in vivo studies of insect chitin concerning human health (Table 3).
Table 3. Edible insects in gut health and disease.
Table 3. Edible insects in gut health and disease.
Study MethodsMain FindingsRecommendationsReferences
Critical review on the effects of chitin and derived polysaccharides on human gut microbiotaReviewWhole insect meal is beneficial in the modulation of gut microbiota. Chitin-derived chitosan has the potential to be prebiotic when ingested with low protein diets, as a high protein content may counteract the benefits of chitin. Chitosan promotes the growth of beneficial bacteria, suppresses potentially pathogenic bacteria, has anti-inflammatory and immune stimulating properties, and may also help to treat obesity and diabetesThere is a need for more research to promote the use of chitin and chitosan as human food.[65]
Effects of consuming whole cricket powder on gut microbiota; n = 20Stool analysisEnhanced growth of Bifidobacterium animalis and reduced TNF-αNeed to understand underlying mechanisms[87]
The potential of the edible insect as a prebioticIn vitro bacterial composition of human fecal microbiomeChanges in microbial composition induced by undigested insect material in the batch culture—particularly, an increase in Faecalibacterium spp., previously associated with anti-inflammation There is a need to test this in vivo [88]
In vitro gastrointestinal digestion of cricket protein hydrolysatesSequential fractionationProtein peptides from edible crickets have positive effects on inflammation and hypersensitivityFurther research on the underlying mechanisms of the anti-inflammation effects of cricket peptides [89]
Adding insects to the dietReview Reduced nutrient deficiencies and beneficial effects of insect bioactive compounds in diseases such as coronary heart disease, inflammation, and cancerBioactive compounds derived from insects should be used to formulate diets for better health[90]
Benefits of eating insects and shrimps ReviewInsect extracts have antioxidant properties and the potential to be used in low-sodium dietsThere is a need for further in vivo and clinical studies[91]
Environmental and health benefits of edible insectsReviewImproved gastrointestinal health, reduced infection, and improved immunity. This could be due to reduced inflammation and a high protein content that is important in building musclesNeed for well-designed clinical studies[92]
Consumption of insect-derived proteinDouble-blind controlled trialIncreased muscle synthesis at rest and during exerciseIncrease the use of insects to provide high-quality proteins [93]
The antioxidant ability of insect productsReviewEdible insect-derived products can help the oxidative stress-mediated infectionResearch to develop oxidative molecules from edible insects[94]
Edible insects in complementary foodRandomized control trialImproved micronutrient status in infantsMore research on nutrient bioavailability; there is also a need to use edible insect products to save humanitarian situations, especially in malnourished children[95]
Effects of edible insects on gut healthReviewImproved gut health and microbial diversity, and increased secretion of short-chain fatty acidsStudy of digestion and bioavailability of chitin in humans[86]
Prebiotic potential of insect chitosanIn vitro studyInhibition of pathogenic bacteriaNeed for in vivo studies to test its use as a prebiotic.[96]
Feeding bugs to bugsBatch culture inoculationModulation of gut microbiotaNeed for in vivo studies to gain insight into the required dosage[88]
There are other important types of prebiotics, the majority of which are subsets of carbohydrates [84]. Among the most important prebiotics are fructans, which consist of inulin and fructooligosaccharides, which stimulate bacteria species capable of fermenting them [84]; lactic acid bacteria are stimulated the most, although other bacteria species may also be promoted. Galacto-oligosaccharides are also prebiotic and can strongly stimulate Bifidobacteria and lactobacilli [97]. Starch that is resistant to digestion in the upper part of the digestive system can produce butyrate during fermentation and can promote the growth of Firmicutes [98]. Pectin and cocoa-derived flavanols stimulate lactic acid bacteria [84]. The use of edible insects as prebiotics would be beneficial when compared to other sources due to their occurrence together with high protein, fat, and fiber contents. Most animal protein sources are considered of high quality but lack dietary fiber; on the contrary, edible insects can provide a high animal protein source with fiber that could act as a prebiotic. A good prebiotic would work in the local gastrointestinal tract to support the selective growth of beneficial bacteria [96]. The gut is constantly exposed to substances and toxins that are likely to cause dysbiosis [74]; therefore, frequent interventions to ensure balanced microbiota in the gut are necessary.

4. Conclusions and Outlook

The gut microbiome plays an important role in disease, and taking prebiotics helps restore normal gut flora by promoting the growth of beneficial bacteria and reducing the risk of chronic infections. Chitin from edible insects may be a functional prebiotic due to its ability to stimulate the growth of certain beneficial bacteria, which may help solve gut health problems by acting directly as an antimicrobial or as a prebiotic to feed probiotic bacteria. Although prebiotics have tremendous benefits, there is the limitation of individual variability caused by the diversity of microbiota present due to diet, race, age, and health status. The effect is likely dose-dependent, and despite the consumption of edible insects by traditional or new consumers, it is necessary to determine the effective amount that will influence gut health. The ingestion of insects during swarming season has been associated with diarrhea and bloating in the past, which may be due to intolerance of chitin in some people. Therefore, consumers should be in consultation with health professionals to avoid unforeseen negative effects. The production of prebiotics from edible insects may require additional steps to ensure a high quality and meet desired properties, and this can be expensive.

Funding

This work was funded by the Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture—Funding code 2819DOKA01.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares that there are no conflict of interest concerning this work.

References

  1. Rumpold, B.A.; Schluter, O.K. Nutritional composition and safety aspects of edible insects. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2013, 57, 802–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Van Huis, A.; Rumpold, B.; van der Fels-Klerx, H.; Tomberlin, J. Advancing edible insects as food and feed in a circular economy. J. Insects Food Feed 2021, 7, 935–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Sogari, G.; Riccioli, F.; Moruzzo, R.; Menozzi, D.; Sosa, D.A.T.; Li, J.; Liu, A.J.; Mancini, S. Engaging in entomophagy: The role of food neophobia and disgust between insect and non-insect eaters. Food Qual. Prefer. 2023, 104, 104764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. European Commission. Authorising the placing on the market of frozen, dried and powder forms of Acheta domesticus as a novel food under Regulation (EU) 2015/2283 of the European Parliament and of the Council, and amending Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/2470. Off. J. Eur. Union 2022, 7. [Google Scholar]
  5. Gasco, L.; Jozefiak, A.; Henry, M. Beyond the protein concept: Health aspects of using edible insects on animals. J. Insects Food Feed 2021, 7, 715–741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Aguilar-Toala, J.E.; Cruz-Monterrosa, R.G.; Liceaga, A.M. Beyond Human Nutrition of Edible Insects: Health Benefits and Safety Aspects. Insects 2022, 13, 1007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. van Huis, A. Edible insects are the future? Proc. Nutr. Soc. 2016, 75, 294–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. van Huis, A.; Rumpold, B.; Maya, C.; Roos, N. Nutritional Qualities and Enhancement of Edible Insects. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 2021, 41, 551–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lumanlan, J.C.; Williams, M.; Jayasena, V. Edible insects: Environmentally friendly sustainable future food source. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2022, 57, 6317–6325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wade, M.; Hoelle, J. A review of edible insect industrialization: Scales of production and implications for sustainability. Environ. Res. Lett. 2020, 15, 123013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Meyer-Rochow, V.B.; Gahukar, R.T.; Ghosh, S.; Jung, C. Chemical Composition, Nutrient Quality and Acceptability of Edible Insects Are Affected by Species, Developmental Stage, Gender, Diet, and Processing Method. Foods 2021, 10, 1036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Ramos-Bueno, R.P.; Gonzalez-Fernandez, M.J.; Sanchez-Muros-Lozano, M.J.; Garcia-Barroso, F.; Guil-Guerrero, J.L. Fatty acid profiles and cholesterol content of seven insect species assessed by several extraction systems. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2016, 242, 1471–1477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hematyar, N.; Rustad, T.; Sampels, S.; Dalsgaard, T.K. Relationship between lipid and protein oxidation in fish. Aquac. Res. 2019, 50, 1393–1403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Slocinska, M.; Marciniak, P.; Rosinski, G. Insects antiviral and anticancer peptides: New leads for the future? Protein Pept. Lett. 2008, 15, 578–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Bordiean, A.; Krzyżaniak, M.; Stolarski, M.J.; Czachorowski, S.; Peni, D. Will yellow mealworm become a source of safe proteins for Europe? Agriculture 2020, 10, 233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Finke, M.D. Complete nutrient content of four species of commercially available feeder insects fed enhanced diets during growth. Zoo Biol. 2015, 34, 554–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Payne, C.L.R.; Scarborough, P.; Rayner, M.; Nonaka, K. Are edible insects more or less ‘healthy’ than commonly consumed meats? A comparison using two nutrient profiling models developed to combat over- and undernutrition. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2016, 70, 285–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Thrastardottir, R.; Olafsdottir, H.T.; Thorarinsdottir, R.I. Yellow Mealworm and Black Soldier Fly Larvae for Feed and Food Production in Europe, with Emphasis on Iceland. Foods 2021, 10, 2744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Pastell, H.; Mellberg, S.; Ritvanen, T.; Raatikainen, M.; Mykkanen, S.; Niemi, J.; Latomaki, I.; Wirtanen, G. How Does Locally Produced Feed Affect the Chemical Composition of Reared House Crickets (Acheta domesticus)? ACS Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 1, 625–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kowalczewski, P.; Siejak, P.; Jarzębski, M.; Jakubowicz, J.; Jeżowski, P.; Walkowiak, K.; Smarzyński, K.; Ostrowska-Ligęza, E.; Baranowska, H. Comparison of technological and physicochemical properties of cricket powders of different origin. J. Insects Food Feed 2022, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Rodríguez-Miranda, J.; Alcántar-Vázquez, J.P.; Zúñiga-Marroquín, T.; Juárez-Barrientos, J.M. Insects as an alternative source of protein: A review of the potential use of grasshopper (Sphenarium purpurascens Ch.) as a food ingredient. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2019, 245, 2613–2620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Magalhães, R.; Sánchez-López, A.; Leal, R.S.; Martínez-Llorens, S.; Oliva-Teles, A.; Peres, H. Black soldier fly (Hermetia illucens) pre-pupae meal as a fish meal replacement in diets for European seabass (Dicentrarchus labrax). Aquaculture 2017, 476, 79–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Singh, A.; Gairola, K.; Upadhyay, V.; Kumar, J. Chitosan: An elicitor and antimicrobial Bio-resource in plant protection. Agric. Rev. 2018, 39, 163–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Zhou, G.Y.; Zhang, H.Y.; He, Y.H.; He, L. Identification of a chitin deacetylase producing bacteria isolated from soil and its fermentation optimization. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res. 2010, 4, 2597–2603. [Google Scholar]
  25. Xu, Y.; Mao, H.; Yang, C.; Du, H.; Wang, H.; Tu, J. Effects of chitosan nanoparticle supplementation on growth performance, humoral immunity, gut microbiota and immune responses after lipopolysaccharide challenge in weaned pigs. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2020, 104, 597–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kröncke, N.; Baur, A.; Böschen, V.; Demtröder, S.; Benning, R.; Delgado, A. Automation of insect mass rearing and processing technologies of mealworms (Tenebrio molitor). In African Edible Insects as Alternative Source of Food, Oil, Protein and Bioactive Components; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2020; pp. 123–139. [Google Scholar]
  27. Raheem, D.; Carrascosa, C.; Oluwole, O.B.; Nieuwland, M.; Saraiva, A.; Millan, R.; Raposo, A. Traditional consumption of and rearing edible insects in Africa, Asia and Europe. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2019, 59, 2169–2188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Han, R.; Shin, J.T.; Kim, J.; Choi, Y.S.; Kim, Y.W. An overview of the South Korean edible insect food industry: Challenges and future pricing/promotion strategies. Entomol. Res. 2017, 47, 141–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kelemu, S.; Niassy, S.; Torto, B.; Fiaboe, K.; Affognon, H.; Tonnang, H.; Maniania, N.K.; Ekesi, S. African edible insects for food and feed: Inventory, diversity, commonalities and contribution to food security. J. Insects Food and Feed 2015, 1, 103–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Garino, C.; Mielke, H.; Knuppel, S.; Selhorst, T.; Broll, H.; Braeuning, A. Quantitative allergenicity risk assessment of food products containing yellow mealworm (Tenebrio molitor). Food Chem. Toxicol. 2020, 142, 111460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Feng, Y.; Chen, X.M.; Zhao, M.; He, Z.; Sun, L.; Wang, C.Y.; Ding, W.F. Edible insects in China: Utilization and prospects. Insect Sci. 2018, 25, 184–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Bhattacharyya, S.; Das, C. Foodborne infections and food safety. East. J. Med. Sci. 2022, 60–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Pali-Schöll, I.; Meinlschmidt, P.; Larenas-Linnemann, D.; Purschke, B.; Hofstetter, G.; Rodríguez-Monroy, F.A.; Einhorn, L.; Mothes-Luksch, N.; Jensen-Jarolim, E.; Jäger, H. Edible insects: Cross-recognition of IgE from crustacean-and house dust mite allergic patients, and reduction of allergenicity by food processing. World Allergy Organ. J. 2019, 12, 100006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Murefu, T.R.; Macheka, L.; Musundire, R.; Manditsera, F.A. Safety of wild harvested and reared edible insects: A review. Food Control 2019, 101, 209–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zuk-Golaszewska, K.; Galecki, R.; Obremski, K.; Smetana, S.; Figiel, S.; Golaszewski, J. Edible Insect Farming in the Context of the EU Regulations and Marketing-An Overview. Insects 2022, 13, 446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Meyer, A.M.; Meijer, N.; Hoek-van den Hil, E.F.; Van der Fels-Klerx, H.J. Chemical food safety hazards of insects reared for food and feed. J. Insects Food Feed 2021, 7, 823–831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. European Commision. Council Directive 98/58/EC of 20 July 1998 Concerning the Protection of Animals Kept for Farming Purposes. European Commision, Ed.; European Commission, European Union. 1998. Available online: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/1998/58/oj (accessed on 10 March 2023).
  38. Delgado, L.; Garino, C.; Moreno, F.J.; Zagon, J.; Broll, H. Sustainable Food Systems: EU Regulatory Framework and Contribution of Insects to the Farm-To-Fork Strategy. Food Rev. Int. 2022, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Smetana, S.; Palanisamy, M.; Mathys, A.; Heinz, V. Sustainability of insect use for feed and food: Life Cycle Assessment perspective. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 137, 741–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Siddiqui, S.A.; Ristow, B.; Rahayu, T.; Putra, N.S.; Yuwono, N.W.; Nisa, K.; Mategeko, B.; Smetana, S.; Saki, M.; Nawaz, A.; et al. Black soldier fly larvae (BSFL) and their affinity for organic waste processing. Waste Manag. 2022, 140, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Lalander, C.; Diener, S.; Zurbrugg, C.; Vinneras, B. Effects of feedstock on larval development and process efficiency in waste treatment with black soldier fly (Hermetia illucens). J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 208, 211–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Tokwaro, R.; Semiyaga, S.; Niwagaba, C.B.; Nakagiri, A.; Sempewo, J.I.; Muoghalu, C.C.; Manga, M. Application of black soldier fly larvae in decentralized treatment of faecal sludge from pit latrines in informal settlements in Kampala City. Front. Environ. Sci. 2023, 11, 138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Chirere, T.E.S.; Khalil, S.; Lalander, C. Fertiliser effect on Swiss chard of black soldier fly larvae-frass compost made from food waste and faeces. J. Insects Food Feed 2021, 7, 457–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Soliman, G.A. Dietary Fiber, Atherosclerosis, and Cardiovascular Disease. Nutrients 2019, 11, 1155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Shahidi, F.; Arachchi, J.K.V.; Jeon, Y.J. Food applications of chitin and chitosans. Trends Food Sci. Tech. 1999, 10, 37–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Amiri, H.; Aghbashlo, M.; Sharma, M.; Gaffey, J.; Manning, L.; Basri, S.M.M.; Kennedy, J.F.; Gupta, V.K.; Tabatabaei, M. Chitin and chitosan derived from crustacean waste valorization streams can support food systems and the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Nat. Food 2022, 3, 822–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Jones, M.; Kujundzic, M.; John, S.; Bismarck, A. Crab vs. Mushroom: A Review of Crustacean and Fungal Chitin in Wound Treatment. Mar. Drugs 2020, 18, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Ma, J.; Faqir, Y.; Tan, C.; Khaliq, G. Terrestrial insects as a promising source of chitosan and recent developments in its application for various industries. Food Chem. 2022, 373, 131407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Hahn, T.; Tafi, E.; Paul, A.; Salvia, R.; Falabella, P.; Zibek, S. Current state of chitin purification and chitosan production from insects. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2020, 95, 2775–2795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Kipkoech, C.; Kinyuru, J.; Imathiu, S.; Roos, N. Use of house cricket to address food security in Kenya: Nutrient and chitin composition of farmed crickets as influenced by age. Afr. J. Agric. Res. 2017, 12, 3189–3197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Derrien, C.; Boccuni, A. Current status of the insect producing industry in Europe. In Edible Insects in Sustainable Food Systems; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; pp. 471–479. [Google Scholar]
  52. European Commission. Approval of chitosan hydrochloride as basic substance in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009; European Commission, Ed.; European Commission, European Union: Washington, DC, USA, 2014; pp. 5–7. [Google Scholar]
  53. Santos, V.P.; Marques, N.S.S.; Maia, P.C.S.V.; de Lima, M.A.B.; Franco, L.D.; de Campos-Takaki, G.M. Seafood Waste as Attractive Source of Chitin and Chitosan Production and Their Applications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 4290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Kemboi, V.J.; Kipkoech, C.; Njire, M.; Were, S.; Lagat, M.K.; Ndwiga, F.; Wesonga, J.M.; Tanga, C.M. Biocontrol Potential of Chitin and Chitosan Extracted from Black Soldier Fly Pupal Exuviae against Bacterial Wilt of Tomato. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Ibitoye, E.B.; Lokman, I.H.; Hezmee, M.N.M.; Goh, Y.M.; Zuki, A.B.Z.; Jimoh, A.A.; Danmaigoro, A.; Nicholas, N.P. Gut health and serum growth hormone levels of broiler chickens fed dietary chitin and chitosan from cricket and shrimp. Poult. Sci. 2019, 98, 745–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Kamilya, D.; Khan, M.I.R. Chitin and chitosan as promising immunostimulant for aquaculture. In Handbook of Chitin and Chitosan; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; pp. 761–771. [Google Scholar]
  57. Zhang, J.; Wan, J.; Wu, G.; Chen, D.; Yu, B.; Huang, Z.; Mao, X.; Zheng, P.; Yu, J.; He, J. Low-molecular-weight chitosan relieves enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli-induced growth retardation in weaned pigs. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2020, 78, 105798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Huq, T.; Khan, A.; Brown, D.; Dhayagude, N.; He, Z.; Ni, Y. Sources, production and commercial applications of fungal chitosan: A review. J. Bioresour. Bioprod. 2022, 7, 85–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Araújo, D.; Ferreira, I.C.; Torres, C.A.; Neves, L.; Freitas, F. Chitinous polymers: Extraction from fungal sources, characterization and processing towards value-added applications. J. Chem. Technol. Biot. 2020, 95, 1277–1289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Lagat, M.K.; Were, S.; Ndwigah, F.; Kemboi, V.J.; Kipkoech, C.; Tanga, C.M. Antimicrobial Activity of Chemically and Biologically Treated Chitosan Prepared from Black Soldier Fly (Hermetia illucens) Pupal Shell Waste. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 2417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Zainol Abidin, N.A.; Kormin, F.; Zainol Abidin, N.A.; Mohamed Anuar, N.A.F.; Abu Bakar, M.F. The potential of insects as alternative sources of chitin: An overview on the chemical method of extraction from various sources. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 4978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Borrelli, L.; Coretti, L.; Dipineto, L.; Bovera, F.; Menna, F.; Chiariotti, L.; Nizza, A.; Lembo, F.; Fioretti, A. Insect-based diet, a promising nutritional source, modulates gut microbiota composition and SCFAs production in laying hens. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 16269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Gong, T.; Zhou, Y.; Zhang, L.; Wang, H.; Zhang, M.; Liu, X. Capsaicin combined with dietary fiber prevents high-fat diet associated aberrant lipid metabolism by improving the structure of intestinal flora. Food Sci. Nutr. 2023, 11, 114–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Abbott, A. Scientists bust myth that our bodies have more bacteria than human cells. Nat. News 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Lopez-Santamarina, A.; Mondragon, A.D.C.; Lamas, A.; Miranda, J.M.; Franco, C.M.; Cepeda, A. Animal-Origin Prebiotics Based on Chitin: An Alternative for the Future? A Critical Review. Foods 2020, 9, 782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Kashtanova, D.A.; Popenko, A.S.; Tkacheva, O.N.; Tyakht, A.B.; Alexeev, D.G.; Boytsov, S.A. Association between the gut microbiota and diet: Fetal life, early childhood, and further life. Nutrition 2016, 32, 620–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Maukonen, J.; Saarela, M. Human gut microbiota: Does diet matter? Proc. Nutr. Soc 2015, 74, 23–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Merra, G.; Noce, A.; Marrone, G.; Cintoni, M.; Tarsitano, M.G.; Capacci, A.; De Lorenzo, A. Influence of mediterranean diet on human gut microbiota. Nutrients 2021, 13, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Rio-Aige, K.; Azagra-Boronat, I.; Massot-Cladera, M.; Selma-Royo, M.; Parra-Llorca, A.; Gonzalez, S.; Garcia-Mantrana, I.; Castell, M.; Rodriguez-Lagunas, M.J.; Collado, M.C.; et al. Association of Maternal Microbiota and Diet in Cord Blood Cytokine and Immunoglobulin Profiles. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 1778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Teng, N.M.Y.; Price, C.A.; McKee, A.M.; Hall, L.J.; Robinson, S.D. Exploring the impact of gut microbiota and diet on breast cancer risk and progression. Int. J. Cancer 2021, 149, 494–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Berding, K.; Vlckova, K.; Marx, W.; Schellekens, H.; Stanton, C.; Clarke, G.; Jacka, F.; Dinan, T.G.; Cryan, J.F. Diet and the Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis: Sowing the Seeds of Good Mental Health. Adv. Nutr. 2021, 12, 1239–1285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Lankelma, J.M.; Nieuwdorp, M.; de Vos, W.M.; Wiersinga, W.J. The gut microbiota in internal medicine: Implications for health and disease. Neth. J. Med. 2015, 73, 61–68. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  73. Lee, Y.K. Effects of diet on gut microbiota profile and the implications for health and disease. Biosci. Microbiota Food Health 2013, 32, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Walker, W. Dysbiosis. In The Microbiota in Gastrointestinal Pathophysiology; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2017; pp. 227–232. [Google Scholar]
  75. Carding, S.; Verbeke, K.; Vipond, D.T.; Corfe, B.M.; Owen, L.J. Dysbiosis of the gut microbiota in disease. Microb. Ecol. Health Dis. 2015, 26, 26191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Levy, M.; Kolodziejczyk, A.A.; Thaiss, C.A.; Elinav, E. Dysbiosis and the immune system. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2017, 17, 219–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Bibbo, S.; Ianiro, G.; Giorgio, V.; Scaldaferri, F.; Masucci, L.; Gasbarrini, A.; Cammarota, G. The role of diet on gut microbiota composition. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2016, 20, 4742–4749. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  78. Flint, H.J.; Duncan, S.H.; Scott, K.P.; Louis, P. Links between diet, gut microbiota composition and gut metabolism. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 2015, 74, 13–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  79. Zhang, N.; Ju, Z.; Zuo, T. Time for food: The impact of diet on gut microbiota and human health. Nutrition 2018, 51–52, 80–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Magnúsdóttir, S.; Ravcheev, D.; de Crécy-Lagard, V.; Thiele, I. Systematic genome assessment of B-vitamin biosynthesis suggests co-operation among gut microbes. Front. Genet. 2015, 6, 148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Valdes, A.M.; Walter, J.; Segal, E.; Spector, T.D. Role of the gut microbiota in nutrition and health. BMJ 2018, 361, k2179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Plaza-Diaz, J.; Ruiz-Ojeda, F.J.; Gil-Campos, M.; Gil, A. Mechanisms of action of probiotics. Adv. Nutr. 2019, 10, S49–S66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Lee, J.H.; Kim, T.K.; Jeong, C.H.; Yong, H.I.; Cha, J.Y.; Kim, B.K.; Choi, Y.S. Biological activity and processing technologies of edible insects: A review. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2021, 30, 1003–1023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Davani-Davari, D.; Negahdaripour, M.; Karimzadeh, I.; Seifan, M.; Mohkam, M.; Masoumi, S.J.; Berenjian, A.; Ghasemi, Y. Prebiotics: Definition, types, sources, mechanisms, and clinical applications. Foods 2019, 8, 92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. Ushakova, N.; Nekrasov, R.; Pravdin, I.; Sverchkova, N.; Kolomiyets, E.; Pavlov, D. Mechanisms of the effects of probiotics on symbiotic digestion. Biol. Bull. 2015, 42, 394–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Anusha, S.; Negi, P.S. Edible insects and gut health. In Nutrition and Functional Foods in Boosting Digestion, Metabolism and Immune Health; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2022; pp. 523–539. [Google Scholar]
  87. Stull, V.J.; Finer, E.; Bergmans, R.S.; Febvre, H.P.; Longhurst, C.; Manter, D.K.; Patz, J.A.; Weir, T.L. Impact of Edible Cricket Consumption on Gut Microbiota in Healthy Adults, a Double-blind, Randomized Crossover Trial. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 10762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Young, W.; Arojju, S.K.; McNeill, M.R.; Rettedal, E.; Gathercole, J.; Bell, N.; Payne, P. Feeding Bugs to Bugs: Edible Insects Modify the Human Gut Microbiome in an in vitro Fermentation Model. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 1763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Hall, F.; Reddivari, L.; Liceaga, A.M. Identification and Characterization of Edible Cricket Peptides on Hypertensive and Glycemic In Vitro Inhibition and Their Anti-Inflammatory Activity on RAW 264.7 Macrophage Cells. Nutrients 2020, 12, 3588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Acosta-Estrada, B.A.; Reyes, A.; Rosell, C.M.; Rodrigo, D.; Ibarra-Herrera, C.C. Benefits and Challenges in the Incorporation of Insects in Food Products. Front. Nutr. 2021, 8, 687712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Mishyna, M.; Glumac, M. So different, yet so alike Pancrustacea: Health benefits of insects and shrimps. J. Funct. Foods 2021, 76, 104316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Nowakowski, A.C.; Miller, A.C.; Miller, M.E.; Xiao, H.; Wu, X. Potential health benefits of edible insects. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2022, 62, 3499–3508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Hermans, W.J.H.; Senden, J.M.; Churchward-Venne, T.A.; Paulussen, K.J.M.; Fuchs, C.J.; Smeets, J.S.J.; van Loon, J.J.A.; Verdijk, L.B.; van Loon, L.J.C. Insects are a viable protein source for human consumption: From insect protein digestion to postprandial muscle protein synthesis in vivo in humans: A double-blind randomized trial. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2021, 114, 934–944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Oghenesuvwe, E.E.; Paul, C. Edible insects bio-actives as anti-oxidants: Current status and perspectives. J. Complement. Med. Res. 2019, 10, 89–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Konyole, S.O. Effect of Improved Complementary Foods on Growth and Iron Status of Kenyan Infants; University of Nairobi: Nairobi, Kenya, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  96. Kipkoech, C.; Kinyuru, J.N.; Imathiu, S.; Meyer-Rochow, V.B.; Roos, N. In Vitro Study of Cricket Chitosan’s Potential as a Prebiotic and a Promoter of Probiotic Microorganisms to Control Pathogenic Bacteria in the Human Gut. Foods 2021, 10, 2310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Hong, K.B.; Kim, J.H.; Kwon, H.K.; Han, S.H.; Park, Y.; Suh, H.J. Evaluation of prebiotic effects of high-purity galactooligosaccharides in vitro and in vivo. Food Technol. Biotechnol. 2016, 54, 156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Zaman, S.A.; Sarbini, S.R. The potential of resistant starch as a prebiotic. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2016, 36, 578–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Process of obtaining chitosan from various sources.
Figure 1. Process of obtaining chitosan from various sources.
Polysaccharides 04 00009 g001
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kipkoech, C. Beyond Proteins—Edible Insects as a Source of Dietary Fiber. Polysaccharides 2023, 4, 116-128. https://doi.org/10.3390/polysaccharides4020009

AMA Style

Kipkoech C. Beyond Proteins—Edible Insects as a Source of Dietary Fiber. Polysaccharides. 2023; 4(2):116-128. https://doi.org/10.3390/polysaccharides4020009

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kipkoech, Carolyne. 2023. "Beyond Proteins—Edible Insects as a Source of Dietary Fiber" Polysaccharides 4, no. 2: 116-128. https://doi.org/10.3390/polysaccharides4020009

APA Style

Kipkoech, C. (2023). Beyond Proteins—Edible Insects as a Source of Dietary Fiber. Polysaccharides, 4(2), 116-128. https://doi.org/10.3390/polysaccharides4020009

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop