Statement of Peer Review †
- Type of peer review: Single blind
- Conference submission management system: Microsoft CMT
- Number of submissions sent for review: 38
- Number of submissions accepted: 20
- Acceptance rate (number of submissions accepted/number of submissions received): 52.63%
- Average number of reviews per paper: 2
- Total number of reviewers involved: 21
- Peer-review process and regulations: The review process was single-blinded. The main criteria of acceptance were the originality, clarity of the presentation and the findings.
Conflicts of Interest
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Recioui, A.; Bentarzi, H.; Dekhandji, F.Z. Statement of Peer Review. Eng. Proc. 2023, 29, 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2023029018
Recioui A, Bentarzi H, Dekhandji FZ. Statement of Peer Review. Engineering Proceedings. 2023; 29(1):18. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2023029018
Chicago/Turabian StyleRecioui, Abdelmadjid, Hamid Bentarzi, and Fatma Zohra Dekhandji. 2023. "Statement of Peer Review" Engineering Proceedings 29, no. 1: 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2023029018
APA StyleRecioui, A., Bentarzi, H., & Dekhandji, F. Z. (2023). Statement of Peer Review. Engineering Proceedings, 29(1), 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2023029018