Olfactory Interfaces: Recent Trends and Challenges of E-Noses in Human–Computer Interaction †
Abstract
:1. Introduction
1.1. Background on E-Noses
1.2. Composition of E-Noses
1.3. HCI in E-Noses
- Odor information sensed by the e-nose can be presented to the user visually [15].
- The odor data can be sonified and presented in an auditory display [16].
- E-noses can be used to support sensory substitution, for example, in users with anosmia (the full or partial loss of smell) caused by COVID-19 [17].
- E-noses can be used in wearable computing [18], supporting user mobility.
- E-noses can work seamlessly as ubiquitous computing in an environment, working in the background for the service of users [19].
2. Recent Trends in E-Noses
3. Challenges of E-Noses in HCI
- Odor sensors need a calibration process when used for the first time [27], where sensor manufacturers recommend a time interval for calibrating the sensor. This may require an extra task for either the e-nose (when the calibration is performed automatically by the e-nose algorithm) or its users (performing the calibration manually) if this has not been completed before using the e-nose.
- Sensor drift may affect the e-nose accuracy in HCI, generating false positives in the odor recognition. Fortunately, sensor drift can be compensated by applying artificial intelligence techniques such as deep learning [28].
- A mixture of odors present in the user environment could affect the e-nose performance and recognition because one odor can enhance or weaken another [29], and thus this may affect the HCI.
- Some types of e-noses may not work fast enough for a timely rendering of data to a UI depending on the type of odor sensor [30], affecting the user experience (UX) with the UI interaction.
- In some cases, e-nose data can be difficult to visualize on a GUI due to their amount or complexity, e.g., measuring many types of odors concurrently [31]. HCI techniques such as auditory display techniques (the use of auditory parameters to represent data, e.g., [32]) could be used in UIs, which may help identify and comprehend the odor identification data.
- The e-nose’s UI should clarify the measurement unit notation used in the e-nose application, e.g., clearly show if the odor data are presented as parts per million (PPM) or parts per billion (PPB) [33] to avoid user confusion.
4. Conclusions and Prospects
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Shankar, K.; Mehendale, H.M. Oxidative Stress. In Encyclopedia of Toxicology, 3rd ed.; Wexler, P., Ed.; Academic Press: Oxford, UK, 2014; pp. 735–737. ISBN 978-0-12-386455-0. [Google Scholar]
- Kermani, B.G.; Schiffman, S.S.; Nagle, H.T. Performance of the Levenberg–Marquardt neural network training method in electronic nose applications. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2005, 110, 13–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gardner, J.W.; Shin, H.W.; Hines, E.L. An electronic nose system to diagnose illness. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2000, 70, 19–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharp, H.; Preece, J.; Rogers, Y. Interaction Design: Beyond Human-Computer Interaction, 5th ed.; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Joseph, R.S.; William, R.P. Electrochemistry Encyclopedia—Electrochemical Nose. Available online: https://knowledge.electrochem.org/encycl/art-n01-nose.htm (accessed on 18 April 2022).
- Röck, F.; Barsan, N.; Weimar, U. Electronic Nose: Current Status and Future Trends, Chemical Reviews. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 705–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gardner, J.W.; Bartlett, P.N. A brief history of electronic noses. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 1994, 18, 210–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Technology, K.I. “E-Nose” Can Discriminate Various Mint Scents. Available online: https://phys.org/news/2021-05-e-nose-discriminate-mint-scents.html (accessed on 18 April 2022).
- Garcia-Ruiz, M.A.; Santana-Mancilla, P. DIY Microcontroller Projects for Hobbyists, 1st ed.; Packt: Birmingham, UK, 2021; ISBN 978-1-80056-413-8. [Google Scholar]
- Szulczyński, B.; Gębicki, J.; Namieśnik, J. Application of fuzzy logic to determine the odour intensity of model gas mixtures using electronic nose. E3S Web Conf. 2018, 28, 01036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Srivastava, S.; Mishra, G.; Mishra, H.N. Fuzzy controller based E-nose classification of Sitophilus oryzae infestation in stored rice grain. Food Chem. 2019, 283, 604–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Garcia-Ruiz, M.A.; Santana-Mancilla, P.C.; Gaytan-Lugo, L.S.; Aquino-Santos, R.T. Smelling on the Edge: Using Fuzzy Logic in Edge Computing to Control an Olfactory Display in a Video Game. In Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE Conference on Games (CoG), Beijing, China, 21 August 2022; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2022; pp. 508–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shahid, A.; Choi, J.-H.; Rana, A.U.H.S.; Kim, H.-S. Least Squares Neural Network-Based Wireless E-Nose System Using an SnO2 Sensor Array. Sensors 2018, 18, 1446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Shi, B.; Zhao, L.; Zhi, R.; Xi, X. Optimization of electronic nose sensor array by genetic algorithms in Xihu-Longjing Tea quality analysis. Math. Comput. Model. 2013, 58, 752–758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ko, H.J.; Park, T.H. Bioelectronic nose and its application to smell visualization. J. Biol. Eng. 2016, 10, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Boeve, J.-L.; Giot, R. Volatiles That Sound Bad: Sonification of Defensive Chemical Signals from Insects against Insects. In Proceedings of the the 20th International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD–2014), New York, NY, USA, 22–25 June 2014; ICAD: New York, NY, USA, 2014; p. 6. [Google Scholar]
- Pinger, M.; Draf, J.; Lakner, T.; Ferdenzi, C.; Rouby, C.; Hummel, T.; Bensafi, M. Perceived utility of electronic noses in patients with loss of smell. Eur. Arch. Oto-Rhino-Laryngol. 2021, 278, 2155–2156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Castro-García, J.A.; Molina-Cantero, A.J.; Gómez-González, I.M.; Lafuente-Arroyo, S.; Merino-Monge, M. Towards Human Stress and Activity Recognition: A Review and a First Approach Based on Low-Cost Wearables. Electronics 2022, 11, 155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khaloo, P.; Oubre, B.; Yang, J.; Rahman, T.; Lee, S.I. NOSE: A Novel Odor Sensing Engine for Ambient Moni-toring of the Frying Cooking Method in Kitchen Environments. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 2019, 3, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seesaard, T.; Seaon, S.; Lorwongtragool, P.; Kerdcharoen, T. On-Cloth Wearable E-Nose for Monitoring and Discrimination of Body Odor Signature. In Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE Ninth International Conference on Intelligent Sensors, Sensor Networks and Information Processing (ISSNIP), Singapore, 21–24 April 2014; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2014; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
- Van Tran, V.; Park, D.; Lee, Y.-C. Indoor Air Pollution, Related Human Diseases, and Recent Trends in the Control and Improvement of Indoor Air Quality. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 2927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Chen, J.; Chen, Z.; Boussaid, F.; Zhang, D.; Pan, X.; Zhao, H.; Bermak, A.; Tsui, C.-Y.; Wang, X.; Fan, Z. Ultra-Low-Power Smart Electronic Nose System Based on Three-Dimensional Tin Oxide Nanotube Arrays. ACS Nano 2018, 12, 6079–6088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shi, T.; Wu, G.; Jin, Q.; Wang, X. Camellia oil authentication: A comparative analysis and recent analytical techniques developed for its assessment. A review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 97, 88–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hai, Z.; Wang, J. Detection of adulteration in camellia seed oil and sesame oil using an electronic nose. Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 2006, 108, 116–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kovacs, Z.; Bodor, Z.; Zaukuu, J.-L.Z.; Kaszab, T.; Bazar, G.; Tóth, T.; Mohácsi-Farkas, C. Electronic Nose for Monitoring Odor Changes of Lactobacillus Species during Milk Fermentation and Rapid Selection of Probiotic Candidates. Foods 2020, 9, 1539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, W.; Liu, T.; Brown, A.; Ueland, M.; Forbes, S.L.; Su, S.W. The Use of Electronic Nose for the Classification of Blended and Single Malt Scotch Whisky. IEEE Sens. J. 2022, 22, 7015–7021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maag, B.; Zhou, Z.; Thiele, L. A Survey on Sensor Calibration in Air Pollution Monitoring Deployments. IEEE Internet Things J. 2018, 5, 4857–4870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Rudnitskaya, A. Calibration Update and Drift Correction for Electronic Noses and Tongues. Front. Chem. 2018, 6, 433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Szulczyński, B.; Gębicki, J. Determination of Odor Intensity of Binary Gas Mixtures Using Perceptual Models and an Electronic Nose Combined with Fuzzy Logic. Sensors 2019, 19, 3473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Arshak, K.; Moore, E.; Lyons, G.M.; Harris, J.; Clifford, S. A review of gas sensors employed in electronic nose applications. Sens. Rev. 2004, 24, 181–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Szulczyński, B.; Armiński, K.; Namieśnik, J.; Gębicki, J. Determination of Odour Interactions in Gaseous Mixtures Using Electronic Nose Methods with Artificial Neural Networks. Sensors 2018, 18, 519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Garcia-Ruiz, M.; Aquino-Santos, R.; Vargas Martin, M.; El Seoud, S.A. Using Auditory Display to Teach Network Intrusion Detection. In Proceedings of the ICL, Villach, Austria, 1 January 2007; Kassel University Press: Kassel, Germany, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Binson, V.; Subramoniam, M. Design and development of an e-nose system for the diagnosis of pulmonary diseases. Acta Bioeng. Biomech. 2021, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sierra-Padilla, A.; García-Guzmán, J.; López-Iglesias, D.; Palacios-Santander, J.; Cubillana-Aguilera, L. E-Tongues/Noses Based on Conducting Polymers and Composite Materials: Expanding the Possibilities in Complex Analytical Sensing. Sensors 2021, 21, 4976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Garcia-Ruiz, M.A.; Santana-Mancilla, P.C.; Gaytan-Lugo, L.S. Olfactory Interfaces: Recent Trends and Challenges of E-Noses in Human–Computer Interaction. Eng. Proc. 2023, 31, 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/ASEC2022-13820
Garcia-Ruiz MA, Santana-Mancilla PC, Gaytan-Lugo LS. Olfactory Interfaces: Recent Trends and Challenges of E-Noses in Human–Computer Interaction. Engineering Proceedings. 2023; 31(1):18. https://doi.org/10.3390/ASEC2022-13820
Chicago/Turabian StyleGarcia-Ruiz, Miguel A., Pedro C. Santana-Mancilla, and Laura S. Gaytan-Lugo. 2023. "Olfactory Interfaces: Recent Trends and Challenges of E-Noses in Human–Computer Interaction" Engineering Proceedings 31, no. 1: 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/ASEC2022-13820
APA StyleGarcia-Ruiz, M. A., Santana-Mancilla, P. C., & Gaytan-Lugo, L. S. (2023). Olfactory Interfaces: Recent Trends and Challenges of E-Noses in Human–Computer Interaction. Engineering Proceedings, 31(1), 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/ASEC2022-13820