Next Article in Journal
Statement of Peer Review
Previous Article in Journal
Identification of the Hydrogeological Potential in Langos-San Andres, by Means of Electrical Resistivity Tomography Interpretation
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Engineering Proceedings
Volume 50
Issue 1
10.3390/engproc2023050015
engproc-logo
Submit to this Journal
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Statement of Peer Review †

by
Ioannis Kakkos
* and
Dimitrios Glotsos
Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of West Attica, 12243 Athens, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
All papers published in the volume are presented at the Advances in Biomedical Sciences, Engineering and Technology (ABSET) conference, Athens, Greece, 10–11 June 2023.
Eng. Proc. 2023, 50(1), 15; https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2023050015
Published: 3 January 2024
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of Advances in Biomedical Sciences, Engineering and Technology (ABSET) Conference)
Versions Notes
In submitting conference proceedings to Engineering Proceedings, the volume editors of the proceedings certify to the publisher that all papers published in this volume have been subjected to peer review administered by the volume editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal.
  • Type of peer review: double-blind.
  • Conference submission management system: online submission via the conference site.
  • Number of submissions sent for review: 15.
  • Number of submissions accepted: 14.
  • Acceptance rate (number of submissions accepted/number of submissions received): 93%.
  • Average number of reviews per paper: 2–3.
  • Total number of reviewers involved: 27.
  • Any additional information on the review process: Registered authors with accepted abstracts who will be presenting at the Conference may submit the full paper version of their work to undergo a second peer-review. If the second peer-review is successful, the full paper may be published as part of the Conference Proceedings.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kakkos, I.; Glotsos, D. Statement of Peer Review. Eng. Proc. 2023, 50, 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2023050015

AMA Style

Kakkos I, Glotsos D. Statement of Peer Review. Engineering Proceedings. 2023; 50(1):15. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2023050015

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kakkos, Ioannis, and Dimitrios Glotsos. 2023. "Statement of Peer Review" Engineering Proceedings 50, no. 1: 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2023050015

APA Style

Kakkos, I., & Glotsos, D. (2023). Statement of Peer Review. Engineering Proceedings, 50(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2023050015

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop