Next Article in Journal
The Impact of Implementing Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanisms on the Steel Industry until 2034: A Forecasting Study
Previous Article in Journal
Study on 3D Computer-Aided Feature Inspection for Product Design and Analysis
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Engineering Proceedings
Volume 52
Issue 1
10.3390/engproc2023052030
engproc-logo
Submit to this Journal
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Statement of Peer Review †

by
Russel Torah
1,*,
Kai Yang
2,
Beckie Isaia
1,
Paula Veske-Lepp
3,
Frederick Bossuyt
3 and
Stephen Beeby
1
1
School of Electronics & Computer Science, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK
2
Winchester School of Art, University of Southampton, Southampton SO23 8DL, UK
3
Department of Electronics and Information Systems, University of Ghent, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
All papers published in the volume are presented at E-Textiles 2023: 5th International Conference on the Challenges, Opportunities, Innovations and Applications in Electronic Textiles, Ghent, Belgium, 14–16th November 2023.
Eng. Proc. 2023, 52(1), 30; https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2023052030
Published: 11 March 2024
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of Eng. Proc., 2023, E-Textiles 2023)
Versions Notes
In submitting conference proceedings to MDPI Engineering Proceedings, the volume editors of the proceedings certify to the publisher that all papers published in this volume have been subjected to peer review administered by the volume editors. The reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal.
  • Type of peer review: Open peer review
  • Conference submission management system: ConfTool
  • Number of submissions sent for review: 76
  • Number of submissions accepted: 59 (22 oral, 37 posters)
  • Acceptance rate (number of submissions accepted/number of submissions received): 78% overall, 29% oral.
  • Average number of reviews per paper: 3
  • Total number of reviewers involved: 34
  • Any additional information on the review process: None.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Torah, R.; Yang, K.; Isaia, B.; Veske-Lepp, P.; Bossuyt, F.; Beeby, S. Statement of Peer Review. Eng. Proc. 2023, 52, 30. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2023052030

AMA Style

Torah R, Yang K, Isaia B, Veske-Lepp P, Bossuyt F, Beeby S. Statement of Peer Review. Engineering Proceedings. 2023; 52(1):30. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2023052030

Chicago/Turabian Style

Torah, Russel, Kai Yang, Beckie Isaia, Paula Veske-Lepp, Frederick Bossuyt, and Stephen Beeby. 2023. "Statement of Peer Review" Engineering Proceedings 52, no. 1: 30. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2023052030

APA Style

Torah, R., Yang, K., Isaia, B., Veske-Lepp, P., Bossuyt, F., & Beeby, S. (2023). Statement of Peer Review. Engineering Proceedings, 52(1), 30. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2023052030

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop