Next Article in Journal
Active Fault Detection Device for LV Electrical Installations with Goertzel-Based Impedance Estimation and IoT Connectivity
Previous Article in Journal
An Analysis of Artificial Intelligence Adoption Behavior Applying Extended UTAUT Framework in Urban Cities: The Context of Collectivistic Culture
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Quantitative Comparison of Machine Learning Clustering Methods for Tuberculosis Data Analysis †

1
Department of Information Technology, Non-Profit JSC “Almaty University of Power Engineering and Telecommunications Named after Gumarbek Daukeyev”, 050013 Almaty, Kazakhstan
2
School of Information Technology and Engineering, Kazakh-British Technical University, 050000 Almaty, Kazakhstan
3
Academy of Logistics and Transport, 050012 Almaty, Kazakhstan
4
Faculty of Computer Technologies and Cyber Security, International University of Information Technology, 050000 Almaty, Kazakhstan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 4th International Conference on Communications, Information, Electronic and Energy Systems (CIEES 2023), Plovdiv, Bulgaria, 23–25 November 2023.
Eng. Proc. 2024, 60(1), 20; https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024060020
Published: 16 January 2024

Abstract

In many fields, data-driven decision making has become essential due to machine learning (ML), which provides insights that improve productivity and quality of life. A basic machine learning approach called clustering helps find comparable data points. Clustering plays a critical role in the identification of patient subgroups and the customisation of treatment in the context of tuberculosis (TB) research. While prior studies have recognized its utility, a comprehensive comparative analysis of multiple clustering methods applied to TB data is lacking. Using TB data, this study thoroughly assesses and contrasts four well-known machine learning clustering algorithms: spectral clustering, DBSCAN, hierarchical clustering, and k-means. To evaluate the quality of a cluster, quantitative measures such as the silhouette score, Davies–Bouldin index, and Calinski–Harabasz index are utilised. The results provide quantitative insights that enhance comprehension of clustering and guide future research.
Keywords: machine learning; clustering; tuberculosis; data analysis machine learning; clustering; tuberculosis; data analysis

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kossakov, M.; Mukasheva, A.; Balbayev, G.; Seidazimov, S.; Mukammejanova, D.; Sydybayeva, M. Quantitative Comparison of Machine Learning Clustering Methods for Tuberculosis Data Analysis. Eng. Proc. 2024, 60, 20. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024060020

AMA Style

Kossakov M, Mukasheva A, Balbayev G, Seidazimov S, Mukammejanova D, Sydybayeva M. Quantitative Comparison of Machine Learning Clustering Methods for Tuberculosis Data Analysis. Engineering Proceedings. 2024; 60(1):20. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024060020

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kossakov, Marlen, Assel Mukasheva, Gani Balbayev, Syrym Seidazimov, Dinargul Mukammejanova, and Madina Sydybayeva. 2024. "Quantitative Comparison of Machine Learning Clustering Methods for Tuberculosis Data Analysis" Engineering Proceedings 60, no. 1: 20. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024060020

APA Style

Kossakov, M., Mukasheva, A., Balbayev, G., Seidazimov, S., Mukammejanova, D., & Sydybayeva, M. (2024). Quantitative Comparison of Machine Learning Clustering Methods for Tuberculosis Data Analysis. Engineering Proceedings, 60(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024060020

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop