Next Article in Journal
Harnessing the Power of Random Forest for Precise Short-Term Water Demand Forecasting in Italian Water Districts
Previous Article in Journal
Evaluating Pipe Burst Flooding Impacts in Urban Environments Using a Hazard-Vulnerability-Risk Approach
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Engineering Proceedings
Volume 62
Issue 1
10.3390/engproc2024062026
engproc-logo
Submit to this Journal
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Statement of Peer Review †

by
Geetha Ganesan
1,*,
Xiaochun Cheng
2 and
Valentina Emilia Balas
3
1
School of Computer Science and Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Jain (Deemed-to-Be) University, Bengaluru 562121, India
2
Computer Science Department, Swansea University, Bay Campus, Fabian Way, Swansea SA1 8EN, UK
3
Department of Automatics and Applied Software, Faculty of Engineering, University “Aurel Vlaicu” Arad, 310032 Arad, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
All papers published in this volume are presented at the 2nd Computing Congress 2023, Chennai, India, 28–29 December 2023.
Eng. Proc. 2024, 62(1), 26; https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024062026
Published: 6 September 2024
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 2nd Computing Congress 2023)
Versions Notes
In submitting conference proceedings to Engineering Proceedings, the volume editors of the proceedings certify to the publisher that all the papers published in this volume have been subjected to peer review administered by the volume editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal.
  • Type of peer review: double-blind review process.
  • Conference submission management system: Microsoft Conference Management System.
  • Number of submissions sent for review: 92.
  • Number of submissions accepted: 24.
  • Acceptance rate (number of submissions accepted/number of submissions received): 26.1%.
  • Average number of reviews per paper: 2.
  • Total number of reviewers involved: 31.
  • Any additional information on the review process:
Plagiarism Checker used—Turnitin.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ganesan, G.; Cheng, X.; Balas, V.E. Statement of Peer Review. Eng. Proc. 2024, 62, 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024062026

AMA Style

Ganesan G, Cheng X, Balas VE. Statement of Peer Review. Engineering Proceedings. 2024; 62(1):26. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024062026

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ganesan, Geetha, Xiaochun Cheng, and Valentina Emilia Balas. 2024. "Statement of Peer Review" Engineering Proceedings 62, no. 1: 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024062026

APA Style

Ganesan, G., Cheng, X., & Balas, V. E. (2024). Statement of Peer Review. Engineering Proceedings, 62(1), 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024062026

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop