Next Article in Journal
A Systematic Study on the Effect of the Xanthation Temperature on Viscose Quality
Previous Article in Journal
Detecting Short-Notice Cancellation in Hotels with Machine Learning
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Studies Using Simulation to Examine the Behaviour of Sintered Aluminium Preforms during Densification †

by
Naga Venkata Srinivas Borra
1,2,*,
Veera Venkata Krishna Prasad Davuluri
3,*,
Ksbsvs Sastry
2,
Undru Srikanu
2,
Motupalli Harshad
2,
Akula Rama Krishna Prasad
2 and
Grandhi Sai Ram Teja
2
1
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Acharya Nagarjuna University, Guntur 522510, AP, India
2
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Sri Vasavi Engineering College, Tadepalligudem 534101, AP, India
3
Department of Mechanical Engineering, R.V.R. & J.C. College of Engineering, Guntur 522019, AP, India
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 5th International Conference on Innovative Product Design and Intelligent Manufacturing Systems (IPDIMS 2023), Rourkela, India, 6–7 December 2023.
Eng. Proc. 2024, 66(1), 24; https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024066024
Published: 12 July 2024

Abstract

:
Powder metallurgy process has the advantage of optimized material utilization with near net shape, resulting in reduced costs. The densification behavior of sintered aluminium under different loading conditions plays an important role in assessing the performance of parts. The experimental studies to examine the densification behavior are cost intensive and less flexible. Therefore, simulation studies are conducted and results are compared with the experimentation results. The FEA-based DEFORM-2D tool is used for modeling and simulation purposes. The performance curves of load vs. displacement are plotted. A new material is (Al-cr3c2) made and a flow curve is constructed using the disc compression test findings and using software to meet the experimentally observed flow stress. The relationship between stress and strain is studied under different loading conditions of sintered aluminium preforms during densification. Formability stress and strain in plane stress state condition initially rise with the rise in axial strain and then remain constant throughout the process. With a rise in the height reduction percentage, the relative density rises. The final density is higher because there are more pores in the sample when the aspect ratio is lower and the rate of densification is slower.

1. Introduction

Using compacts of compressed and sintered powder samples, powder forging is the process of creating products in a variety of shapes. On aluminium preforms, cold upsetting tests and various strain tests were conducted to estimate the fracture behavior of porous structured material, and the plastic deformation of permeable materials was predicted using correlation, which involves Poisson’s ratio, relative density, and flow stress [1,2,3]. ki and ni were calculated from the experiments, and it was found that both ni and ki peaked at low packing densities. Researchers have been working on the upset forging technique to densify powder preforms in recent years. Measurements of the (ni) and (ki) for various AR and compositions (ki) in small particles for the uniaxial condition of stress were more than others. The triaxial stress state was consistently found to have a higher hoop stress than the other two stress state scenarios [4,5]. The finite element method was used to study sintered metals’ behavior during forging, focusing on preform shape, density, height–diameter ratio, friction, and porous materials’ deformation under varied friction and aspect ratios. FEA simulations elucidate deformation, fracture strain, and aspect ratio correlation [6,7,8]. Powder metallurgy parts were simulated, analyzing the compacting method, pressure, and temperature’s impact on relative density. The extrusion angle and temperature’s effects on micro structural changes were investigated, finding finer grain structure at lower temperatures. Simulation benefits for material property prediction and product lifecycle optimization we assessed. The impact energy and friction coefficient’s influence on powder metallurgy parts’ green density was assessed, observing density improvement with increased energy and limited effect from friction [9,10,11,12].

2. FEA Simulations on the Densification Process

The experimental investigation focused on aspect ratios (AR) of 1.0, while AR values of 0.75 and 0.5 were analyzed using DEFORM-2D V 8.1. Figure 1 shows the model. Figure 2 depicts the load vs. the displacement from the simulation. Chandrasekhar et al. [11] studied sintered billets’ compaction and deformation characteristics. Disc compression tests determined k and n. Preforms were sintered at 500 °C for an hour with an initial density of 0.88. A preform with a 1:1 aspect ratio was designed for the program’s geometry with a starting density set at 0.88. Compression occurred between hard-surfaced platens, with ram a speed of 0.5 mm/sec and friction between the work piece and dies of 0.3. The displacement, density, and deformation load were recorded, along with the top and bottom bulged dimensions.

3. Discussion

Figure 3 illustrates the axial stress versus axial strain relationship in the simulation and experiments. Stress rises with strain, especially as the preform aspect ratio decreases from 1 to 0.5. The reduced aspect ratio increases the load concentration, closing smaller pores faster, accelerating stress increase compared to higher aspect ratio samples.
Figure 4 depicts stress states and their relation hoop stress σθ versus axial strain εZ. In both stress conditions, hoop stress σθ increases with axial strain, more so in triaxial stress. Simulations and experiments exhibit similar patterns, with slight variations. A reduced aspect ratio augments hoop stress.
Figure 5 depicts the axial strain εz and σm relationship, increasing concurrently in triaxial and plane stress conditions across stress states. Hydro static stress σm is compressed in plane and tensile in triaxial conditions. The simulation agrees with the experiments, consistent across aspect ratios.
Figure 6 compares the formability stress index (β) and axial strain (εZ) under triaxial stress, aligning experimental and simulation data. β increases rapidly with εZ, consistently across aspect ratios. Formability stress is comparable up to 0.15 axial strains, and lower ARs signify lower β.
Figure 7 shows the relationship between β and εZ under plane stress, initially increasing and then stabilizing. Consistent trends between the simulation and experiment are observed, with aspect ratios insignificantly affecting β.
Figure 8 depicts the relationship between β and axial strain under plane stress. Formability stress initially increases with strain before leveling off, which is consistent across the simulation and the experiment. The aspect ratio minimally affects the formability strain index.
Figure 9 shows the density increasing with higher height reduction percentages. The simulation aligns closely with the experiments, with aspect ratios having minimal effect. Compression tests reveal pore closure, enhancing the density. Higher aspect ratios exhibit slower densification due to increased pore content.
Figure 10 illustrates the relationship between axial strain and relative density for aspect ratios 1, 0.75, and 0.5. The density increases with strain for all ratios. Smaller ratios show a higher density. Compression closes pores, enhancing densification.
Figure 11 illustrates density (ρ) and α relation, indicating an initially rapid increase in α due to limited densification from friction. The subsequent load gradually increases the densification and α, reflecting uniform dimensional changes. The simulation aligns with the experimental values.
Figure 12 shows higher densities at the billet center and die interfaces post-simulation, with a lower density in the bulge area due to reduced pore closure from metal displacement. Figure 12b illustrates the metal flow from the center to the periphery, with a decreased velocity at the die–preform interface due to friction.

4. Conclusions

Hoop stress (σθ) rises as the axial stress (σZ) rises in both the triaxial and plane stress conditions, and it was discovered that (σθ) is higher in the triaxial stress condition. In the triaxial and plane stress states, the hydrostatic stress (σm) is tensile and compressive and follows same pattern for all aspect ratios. Triaxial stress state conditions have a higher hydrostatic stress than in the other conditions. Axial strain (εZ) causes a rise in the formability stress index. It exhibits the same pattern for all aspect ratios in triaxial stress conditions and is higher for low aspect ratio (AR) specimens compared to high AR specimens. Formability stress and strain in plane stress state conditions initially rise with the rise in saxial strain and then remain constant throughout the process. With a rise in the height reduction percentage, the relative density rises. The final density is higher because there are more pores in the sample when the aspect ratio is lower and the rate of densification is slower.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, methodology, software, validation, formal analysis, investigation, resources, data curation, original draft preparation, N.V.S.B. and V.V.K.P.D.; review and editing, K.S., U.S., M.H., A.R.K.P. and G.S.R.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data will be made available on considerable request to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kuhn, H.A.; Downey, C.L. How flow and fracture affect design of preforms of powder forging. Powder Metallurgy Powder Technol. 1974, 10, 59–66. [Google Scholar]
  2. Narayanasamy, R.; Ponalagusamy, R. A Mathematical theory of plasticity for compressible powder metallurgy materials—Part II. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2000, 97, 110–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Park, J.J. Constitutive relations to predict plastic deformations in porous metal during Compaction. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 1995, 37, 709–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Selvakumar, N.; Narayanasamy, R. Phenomenon of strain hardening behaviour of sintered aluminium preforms during cold axial forming. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2003, 142, 347–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Narayanasamy, R.; Ramesh, T.; Pandey, K.S. Some aspects on work ability of aluminium–iron powder metallurgy composite during cold upsetting. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2005, 391, 418–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhang, X.Q.; Peng, Y.H.; Ruan, X.Y. Simulation and fracture prediction for sintered materials in upsetting by FEM. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2000, 105, 253–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Huang, C.C.; Cheng, J.H. An investigation into the forming limits of sintered porous materials under different operational conditions. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2004, 148, 382–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bharath, K.; Khanra, A.K.; Davidson, M.J. Micro Structural Analysis and Simulation Studies of Semi-Solid Extruded Al–Cu–Mg Powder Metallurgy Alloys. In Advances in Materials and Metallurgy, Proceedings of ICEMMM 2018, Kalavakkam, India, 2018; Springer Nature Pte Ltd.: Singapore, 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Smith, L. Simulation in Powder Metallurgy. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference and Exhibition on Powder Metallurgy, Sinaia, Romania, 7–9 July 2005. [Google Scholar]
  10. Zhou, J.; Zhu, C.; Zhang, W.; Ai, W.; Zhang, X.; Liu, K. Experimental and 3D MPFEM simulation study on the green density of Tie6Ale4V powder compact during uniaxial high velocity compaction. J. Alloys Compd. 2020, 817, 153226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chandrasekhar, P.; Singh, S. Investigation of dynamic effects during cold upset-forging of sintered aluminium truncated conical preforms. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2011, 211, 1285–1295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Narayanasamy, R.; Ramesh, T.; Pandey, K.S.; Pandey, S.K. Effect of particle size on new constitutive relationship of aluminium–iron powder metallurgy composite during cold upsetting. Mater. Des. 2008, 29, 1011–1026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The axisymmetric work piece between top die and bottom die after compression in DEFORM 2D.
Figure 1. The axisymmetric work piece between top die and bottom die after compression in DEFORM 2D.
Engproc 66 00024 g001
Figure 2. The load versus displacement graph in DEFORM 2D.
Figure 2. The load versus displacement graph in DEFORM 2D.
Engproc 66 00024 g002
Figure 3. Axial stress vs. axial strain.
Figure 3. Axial stress vs. axial strain.
Engproc 66 00024 g003
Figure 4. Hoop stress vs. axial strain.
Figure 4. Hoop stress vs. axial strain.
Engproc 66 00024 g004
Figure 5. Hydro static stress vs. axial strain.
Figure 5. Hydro static stress vs. axial strain.
Engproc 66 00024 g005
Figure 6. Formability stress index vs. axial strain (AR_1, 0.75, 0.5).
Figure 6. Formability stress index vs. axial strain (AR_1, 0.75, 0.5).
Engproc 66 00024 g006
Figure 7. Formability stress index vs. axial strain (AR_1, 0.75, 0.5).
Figure 7. Formability stress index vs. axial strain (AR_1, 0.75, 0.5).
Engproc 66 00024 g007
Figure 8. Formability stress index vs. axial strain (AR_1, 0.75, 0.5).
Figure 8. Formability stress index vs. axial strain (AR_1, 0.75, 0.5).
Engproc 66 00024 g008
Figure 9. Relative density vs. height reduction.
Figure 9. Relative density vs. height reduction.
Engproc 66 00024 g009
Figure 10. Relative density vs. axial strain.
Figure 10. Relative density vs. axial strain.
Engproc 66 00024 g010
Figure 11. Poisson’s ration vs. relative density.
Figure 11. Poisson’s ration vs. relative density.
Engproc 66 00024 g011
Figure 12. Density distribution (a) and material velocity or rate of flow of material (b).
Figure 12. Density distribution (a) and material velocity or rate of flow of material (b).
Engproc 66 00024 g012
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Borra, N.V.S.; Davuluri, V.V.K.P.; Sastry, K.; Srikanu, U.; Harshad, M.; Prasad, A.R.K.; Teja, G.S.R. Studies Using Simulation to Examine the Behaviour of Sintered Aluminium Preforms during Densification. Eng. Proc. 2024, 66, 24. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024066024

AMA Style

Borra NVS, Davuluri VVKP, Sastry K, Srikanu U, Harshad M, Prasad ARK, Teja GSR. Studies Using Simulation to Examine the Behaviour of Sintered Aluminium Preforms during Densification. Engineering Proceedings. 2024; 66(1):24. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024066024

Chicago/Turabian Style

Borra, Naga Venkata Srinivas, Veera Venkata Krishna Prasad Davuluri, Ksbsvs Sastry, Undru Srikanu, Motupalli Harshad, Akula Rama Krishna Prasad, and Grandhi Sai Ram Teja. 2024. "Studies Using Simulation to Examine the Behaviour of Sintered Aluminium Preforms during Densification" Engineering Proceedings 66, no. 1: 24. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024066024

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop