Next Article in Journal
Incorporation and Mobilisation of Health-Related Organisms from within Drinking Water Biofilm
Previous Article in Journal
Attributing Minimum Night Flow to Individual Pipes in Real-World Water Distribution Networks Using Machine Learning
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

EWA—A Web-Based Awareness Creation Tool for Change Impact on Water Supply †

1
Institute of Urban Water Management and Landscape Water Engineering, Graz University of Technology, Stremayrgasse 10/I, 8010 Graz, Austria
2
Institute of Interactive Systems and Data Science, Graz University of Technology, Sandgasse 36/III, 8010 Graz, Austria
3
Independent Researcher, Tyroltgasse 22/16, 8020 Graz, Austria
4
Media Informatics Group, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Frauenlobstraße 7a, 80337 Munich, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 3rd International Joint Conference on Water Distribution Systems Analysis & Computing and Control for the Water Industry (WDSA/CCWI 2024), Ferrara, Italy, 1–4 July 2024.
Eng. Proc. 2024, 69(1), 114; https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024069114
Published: 10 September 2024

Abstract

:
Climate and demographic changes force water utilities to adapt to shifts in both water demand and water availability. The web-based EWA tool supports Austrian water utilities in addressing these problems. Based on water demand and availability forecasts from 2025 to 2055, it encourages robust planning by calculating different performance indicators based on hydraulic models. It provides a platform for assessing water distribution systems, integrating forecast and operational scenarios, and performance indicators. Users can assess long-term impacts, adjust planning approaches, and visualize results through specific graphs. Tutorials help users navigate the tool, while gamified challenges aim at testing problem-solving skills and motivating users to improve their performance and raise awareness. The EWA tool facilitates resilient and forward-looking planning, which is critical to adapting to climate change and demographic shifts while ensuring sustainable water resource management.

1. Introduction

The impact of climate change and demographic trends on future water supply is a growing concern for water utilities worldwide [1,2]. As longer heat waves and droughts become more frequent, changes in consumer behavior are inevitable. In recent years, more private swimming pools have been built, and garden irrigation systems have been installed, which were previously unnecessary in Austria due to sufficient summer precipitation [3,4,5]. These behavioral changes, coupled with population growth, will lead to a change in water demand, particularly affecting the water supply systems of smaller communities.
Addressing these challenges sustainably requires proactive measures, including consideration of demographic trends and water demand forecasts based on different climate change scenarios. In order to ensure a reliable and sufficient water supply in the long term, it is crucial to take into account changes in settlement patterns and a possible expansion of the supply areas.
To raise awareness of these pressing issues and explore necessary actions in an engaging way, the EWA research project [6] developed a web-based tool with gamification elements for planning water distribution systems. The tool combines elements of hydraulic modeling with water demand forecasting models, providing users with a dynamic platform to navigate through future water supply scenarios. In this paper, we provide an overview of the developed EWA tool, highlighting its features and potential contributions to addressing the challenges posed by climate change and demographic shifts in water management.

2. Materials and Methods

The overall goal of the EWA project was to develop a web-based decision support tool to assist water utilities in strategic resource and network planning, considering the diverse impacts of climate change and demographic trends. An important aspect of the tool is its ability to assess the robustness of planning alternatives by calculating various performance indicators.
These indicators were developed in participatory workshops with stakeholders. The performance indicators were then weighted using an Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) [7]. The AHP was carried out using the AHP online tool [8]. This gave stakeholders the opportunity to help determine which performance indicators would be integrated into the tool. The results of the Wasserschatz study [4] were integrated to incorporate water demand forecasts. This study provides Austria-wide future water demand forecasts up to 2050, depending on climate change and population development. Two different scenarios were developed in the study, one favorable and one unfavorable. The favorable scenario has a low intensity of use, and the unfavorable scenario has a high intensity of use. Furthermore, future water availability was also evaluated for both scenarios within the study.
To combine these findings with hydraulic models, EPANET 2.2 [9] and OOPNET [10], a Python-based programming interface for EPANET, were employed. The simulations use pressure-driven analysis to simulate pressure-deficient conditions more accurately. The tool itself was implemented as a web application to easily update the UI itself and the underlying forecasts for all users. Its architecture consists of a front-end client and a set of back-end services (e.g., databases, computing clusters). The front-end client, built as a single-page application using TypeScript and React, was developed with a strong focus on usability.

3. Results and Discussion

The result of our efforts is a web-based platform with gamification elements tailored explicitly for water utilities looking to future-proof their distribution systems. Within this platform, users can either upload and modify existing systems or create entirely new systems, facilitated by a map-based graphical user interface (Figure 1). Like existing hydraulic modeling tools, users can interact with the model by adding, removing, and changing model components such as pipes, nodes, and pumps.
A key feature of the platform is its emphasis on long-term planning capabilities, supported by a timeline divided into 10-year intervals covering the period from 2025 to 2055. Users can navigate between these time segments, allowing them to track the propagation of model changes over time. For example, if a new water resource is introduced in 2045, it will be available in subsequent years but will be absent if the user switches back to an earlier timeframe.
In addition, estimated increases or decreases in water demand in a specific region for a certain timeframe are allocated to nodal demands in an aliquot manner based on the nodes’ original base demands. To incorporate water availability changes, springs and wells are modeled as nodes with a negative base demand. Again, these base demands are adapted based on the forecasted changes in water availability. Users can also add and switch between different operational scenarios, allowing them to freely model various system states, especially fault conditions like pump failures.
The different future scenarios, timeframes, and operational scenarios are combined to create a set of hydraulic models. Each model is then evaluated using performance indicators. These indicators include critical metrics such as security of supply, water demand coverage, costs, and resource conservation. Users can visualize the evolution of these indicators over time through graphs and data overlays on the map. Users can save their model at any point and try different approaches while modeling. These planning alternatives can then be compared with each other to facilitate informed decision-making.
In addition to classic hydraulic modeling functionality, we introduced a dynamic challenge system. Each challenge consists of several sets of tasks that must be completed sequentially by the user. Each task set is accompanied by descriptive text, which is an invaluable tool for explaining tool functionality, hydraulic modeling concepts, task nuances, or, alternatively, telling interactive stories. Upon completing a challenge, users receive detailed feedback, including optional messages and performance statistics. These gamification elements were added to the tool to improve user onboarding and stimulate the users’ intrinsic motivation while using the tool.
In the web tool, users can freely create or edit challenges and use this feature to raise awareness or demonstrate certain design considerations. For example, a challenge could be to select the optimum location for a large consumer to illustrate the impact of different design decisions.

4. Conclusions

In view of the complex interplay between climate change and demographic change, water supply companies are forced to take strategic, forward-looking, and resilient planning initiatives. To effectively address these challenges, the innovative web-based modeling tool EWA was developed. This versatile tool enables water utilities to systematically explore and develop planning alternatives in a dynamic virtual environment. The EWA tool includes a water demand forecast that considers various climate projections and the effects of demographic trends. By incorporating these dynamic variables, the EWA tool enables stakeholders to model and analyze different scenarios to find optimal solutions tailored to the specific needs of the system. By visualizing potential bottlenecks and challenges arising from unsustainable practices, the tool underscores the importance of environmentally sound approaches to water management. The continuous improvement of the tool’s user interface ensures accessibility and usability and facilitates seamless interaction for stakeholders with different levels of knowledge. In addition, stakeholder feedback has shown that there is particular interest in the challenge feature, which can simulate real-life scenarios to improve user engagement and decision-making.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.S., G.A.-R. and D.F.-H.; methodology, G.A.-R., A.S. and D.F.-H.; software, G.A.-R., V.A. and D.C.; validation, A.S., G.A.-R., V.A. and D.C.; formal analysis, G.A.-R., A.S. and V.A.; investigation, A.S., G.A.-R., V.A. and D.C.; resources, D.F.-H. and J.P.; data curation, A.S., G.A.-R. and V.A.; writing—original draft preparation, A.S.; writing—review and editing, A.S., G.A.-R. and D.F.-H.; visualization, G.A.-R.; supervision, D.F.-H. and J.P.; project administration, D.F.-H. and J.P.; funding acquisition, D.F.-H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research is part of the research project EWA, funded by the Austrian Federal Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, Regions, and Water Management, with a funding amount of €190,000. (https://info.bml.gv.at/themen/wasser/nutzung-wasser/wasserversorgung/entscheidungshilfe-trinkwasserversorgung.html, accessed on 3 September 2024).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available upon request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We sincerely wish to thank the Austrian Federal Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, Regions, and Water Management for funding this project. We would like to thank all stakeholders who were involved in deriving the performance indicators and who were also available for many rounds of feedback. The valuable feedback helped us to improve the tool.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study, in the collection, analysis, or interpretation of data, in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Wang, X.; Zhang, J.; Shahid, S.; Guan, E.; Wu, Y.; Gao, J.; He, R. Adaptation to Climate Change Impacts on Water Demand. Mitig. Adapt. Strateg. Glob. Chang. 2016, 21, 81–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Murdock, S.H.; Albrecht, D.E.; Hamm, R.R.; Backman, K. Role of Sociodemographic Characteristics in Projections of Water Use. J. Water Resour. Plan. Manag. 1991, 117, 235–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Land Steiermark, Abteilung 14 Wasserwirtschaft, Ressourcen und Nachhaltigkeit. Private Schwimmbäder in der Steiermark. Available online: https://www.wasserwirtschaft.steiermark.at/cms/dokumente/12873092_4570309/ad0b90ce/Fachinformation_Private_Schwimmbaeder_24-04-22_web.pdf (accessed on 29 April 2024).
  4. BMLRT Wasserschatz Österreichs: Studie Beantwortet “Wie Viel Wasser Haben Wir, Wie Viel Brauchen Wir?”. Available online: https://info.bml.gv.at/themen/wasser/nutzung-wasser/wasserschatz-oesterreichs-studie.html (accessed on 30 October 2023).
  5. Neunteufel, R.; Schmidt, B.; Perfler, R. Wasserversorgung im Jahre 2015—Erfahrungen und Ausblick. Available online: https://www.ovgw.at/media/medialibrary/2016/04/Studie_Wasserversorgung_2015.pdf (accessed on 29 April 2024).
  6. BML EWA—Entscheidungshilfe in der Wasserversorgung unter Einbeziehung von Wandelfaktoren. Available online: https://info.bml.gv.at/service/publikationen/wasser/ewa-entscheidungshilfe-in-der-wasserversorgung-unter-einbeziehung-von-wandelfaktoren.html (accessed on 11 April 2024).
  7. Saaty, R.W. The Analytic Hierarchy Process—What It Is and How It Is Used. Math. Model. 1987, 9, 161–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Goepel, K.D. Implementation of an Online Software Tool for the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP-OS). Int. J. Anal. Hierarchy Process 2018, 10, 469–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Rossman, L.; Woo, H.; Tryby, M.; Shang, F.; Janke, R.; Haxton, T. EPANET 2.2 User Manual; EPA/600/R-20/133; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  10. Steffelbauer, D.; Fuchs-Hanusch, D. OOPNET: An Object-Oriented EPANET in Python. Procedia Eng. 2015, 119, 710–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Screenshot depicting the map view in the EWA tool. Colored nodes depict nodes with insufficient water pressure. The box in the top right corner describes tasks for the user.
Figure 1. Screenshot depicting the map view in the EWA tool. Colored nodes depict nodes with insufficient water pressure. The box in the top right corner describes tasks for the user.
Engproc 69 00114 g001
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Stelzl, A.; Arbesser-Rastburg, G.; Adler, V.; Camhy, D.; Pirker, J.; Fuchs-Hanusch, D. EWA—A Web-Based Awareness Creation Tool for Change Impact on Water Supply. Eng. Proc. 2024, 69, 114. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024069114

AMA Style

Stelzl A, Arbesser-Rastburg G, Adler V, Camhy D, Pirker J, Fuchs-Hanusch D. EWA—A Web-Based Awareness Creation Tool for Change Impact on Water Supply. Engineering Proceedings. 2024; 69(1):114. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024069114

Chicago/Turabian Style

Stelzl, Anika, Georg Arbesser-Rastburg, Valentin Adler, David Camhy, Johanna Pirker, and Daniela Fuchs-Hanusch. 2024. "EWA—A Web-Based Awareness Creation Tool for Change Impact on Water Supply" Engineering Proceedings 69, no. 1: 114. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024069114

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop