Next Article in Journal
Digital Diplomacy: A Case Study of Foreign Relations of Mongolian and India in Social Media by Big Data Analysis and Computation
Previous Article in Journal
An Investigation of the Synthesis of a Hybrid Homogeneous Structure of ZnO/Si Nanowires with Stable Energy Properties
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Assessing the Impact of Asset Management on Energy Recovery: The ENERGIDRICA Project †

1
Department of Civil, Environmental, Land, Building Engineering and Chemistry, Politecnico di Bari, 70126 Bari, Italy
2
Department of Engineering and Geology, University “G. D’Annunzio” of Chieti-Pescara, 65127 Pescara, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 3rd International Joint Conference on Water Distribution Systems Analysis & Computing and Control for the Water Industry (WDSA/CCWI 2024), Ferrara, Italy, 1–4 July 2024.
Eng. Proc. 2024, 69(1), 43; https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024069043
Published: 3 September 2024

Abstract

:
The ENERGIDRICA project was born in 2017 at a time of transformation in the “management of water infrastructure” in Italy due to socioeconomic and technological events that have determined the current operational context, in which the “digital transition” represents an opportunity to make the processes related to the management and planning activities for these systems more effective and efficient. The concept of the water–energy nexus is the basis of ENERGIDRICA because an efficient use of energy in aqueducts has positive hydraulic and CO2-related impacts.

1. Introduction

Energy efficiency plays a key role in aqueducts, encompassing the treatment, pumping, and transportation of water from the sources to the end users. The “Energidrica: energy efficiency in the management of water networks” project aims to develop innovative tools and methodologies for the energy-efficient management of water systems, featuring the creation of decision-support tools and processes. The ongoing digital transition offers a chance to enhance conventional operations through the collection and analysis of data, transforming them into useful information for the efficient management of these systems. Advanced hydraulic modeling of water networks, including the development of a digital twin, enables analyses using Digital Water Services (DWSs) [1]. DWSs allow for the evaluation of different management and operational scenarios [2], incorporating strategies like optimal pump control, pressure management, pipe rehabilitation, reduction in pumping energy consumption, and use of power recovery systems. This approach aims at assisting water service providers in selecting the best solutions to meet their technical, managerial, and economic requirements, crucial for effective management and planning.
This document presents the outcomes of a project related to a water network in Apulia, managed by Acquedotto Pugliese S.p.A. (AQP), a project partner. Asset management strategies developed in collaboration with AQP and their implications for energy efficiency are discussed, including the assessment of energy consumption for pumping and potential recovery through the installation of microturbines at pressure control points.

2. Materials and Methodology

2.1. Advanced Hydraulic Modeling

The advanced hydraulic modeling of water networks is implemented in the WDNetGIS-XL platform, developed by IDEA-RT s.r.l., as stakeholders of the project [3]. Differently from traditional software (e.g., based on EPANET) aimed at designing and verifying water networks, the implemented model incorporates features that are essential for supporting management decisions. Some of the key attributes of the advanced hydraulic model include (i) pressure-driven simulations to evaluate volumetric water losses based on deterioration and average pressure on each pipe; (ii) detailed analysis of hydraulic data (demand and pressure) for individual users (meters at private connections); (iii) accurate simulation of water levels in tanks, allowing for their feeding from the top; (iv) inclusion of several control devices and valves with customizable rules in the hydraulic simulation; (v) assessments of energy consumption and CO2 production in pumps; (vi) assessment of energy recovery potential through the integration of pressure control and Banki–Mitchell turbines [3]. The WDNetGIS-XL platform’s functionalities are fully interoperable in GIS, supporting the use of DWSs [1]. In line with the evolving concept of digital transformation in the water sector, this model is the bedrock of an advanced approach assisting water network managers, supporting operations focused on water/energy efficiency, combined with integrated data analysis strategies, multi-objective optimization, and complex network theory.

2.2. Methodology to Support the Efficiency of Water Networks

The methodology developed by the project is based on two complementary perspectives, focused on water and energy efficiency, which are considered integrated. In this context, advanced hydraulic modeling via the WDNetGIS-XL platform serves as a bridge between these two areas of efficiency. It provides insights into the hydraulic state of the system across various efficiency scenarios, jointly defined by researchers and AQP technicians based on operational, technical, and economic constraints. Figure 1 illustrates the sequence of technical steps undertaken for this study’s water network.
The process begins with a preliminary phase of analysis of the topological and monitoring data of the network, available to the water company, to construct and validate the network’s geometric model. This model, along with measured data on key hydraulic parameters (e.g., supply flow rate, users’ water consumption, pressure levels, and tank levels), is used to calibrate the water network model [2]. This calibrated model acts as a phenomenological twin of the system under study, enabling the analysis of the main components at which efficiency improvements are targeted, including water losses, energy consumption by pumping systems, and the characteristics and functionality of pressure control devices. In this study, we determine crucial decision variables for six water efficiency scenarios—that include reducing losses through the optimization of pressure control and replacing damaged pipes—and energy efficiency scenarios, such as optimizing pump operations and energy recovery via micro-turbines.

2.3. Case Study

The case study selected by AQP focuses on the network that provides water to the municipalities of Sternatia, Martignano, and Zollino in southern Apulia (Figure 2). Currently, the system operates with two reservoirs: the Corigliano Alto and the Galugnano Vecchio reservoirs. In the proposed efficiency scenarios, the Galugnano Vecchio reservoir will be excluded. The Corigliano Alto reservoir receives water from a group of four wells, of which only one is in constant operation. Additionally, the system includes three pressure control valves (PCVs), one at the entry point of each municipality.

3. Results and Discussion

Table 1 presents key indicators related to water resource use, implemented asset management actions, energy consumption, CO2 emissions, and potential energy recovery through micro-turbines on an annual basis.
These indicators are based on an analysis conducted over a 120 h operational cycle (selecting 5 days from the data provided by AQP). Figure 3a,b visualize the different alternative scenarios regarding water savings achievable through asset management actions, associated energy consumption for pumping, and total recovery potential. The scenarios depicted in the figure are exclusively related to pipeline replacement. It is noted that optimizing pressure control alone can lead to the recovery of more than 75,000 cubic meters of water per year. When this optimization is combined with replacing pipes at a rate exceeding 16% (as seen in scenario 3), the water savings increase to more than 140,000 cubic meters per year. Note that water saving decreases energy recovery. Using the data in Table 2, managers can assess the budget required to implement asset management actions and estimate impact in terms of water and energy savings for each scenario.

4. Conclusions

This paper summarizes alternative strategies based on advanced hydraulic modeling, highlighting their potential to reduce energy consumption, enhance energy recovery, decrease water losses, and improve the efficiency of water networks. Consequently, managers and technicians are equipped with technical and quantitative tools for applying realistic and operational solutions to enhance network performance and ensure superior service quality. In the wider context of the digital transition in the water sector, the outcomes of the Energidrica project contribute by using advanced hydraulic modeling to enrich the knowledge base, realistically simulate system operations, and strengthen the decision-making process, aligned with the current digital transformation efforts.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.A., L.E., A.S., F.G.C., D.B.L. and L.B.; methodology, A.A., L.E., A.S., F.G.C., D.B.L. and L.B.; formal analysis, A.A., L.E., A.S., F.G.C., D.B.L. and L.B.; investigation, A.A., L.E., A.S., F.G.C., D.B.L. and L.B.; writing—original draft preparation, A.A., L.E., A.S., F.G.C., D.B.L. and L.B.; writing—review and editing, A.A., L.E., A.S., F.G.C., D.B.L. and L.B. All authors contributed equally to the article. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Ministry of University and Research, grant ARS01_00625.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors on request.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the ENERGIDRICA project, National Operational Program—Research and Innovation 2014–2020.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Ciliberti, F.G.; Berardi, L.; Laucelli, D.B.; Ariza, A.D.; Enriquez, L.V.; Giustolisi, O. From digital twin paradigm to digital water services. J. Hydroinform. 2023, 25, 2444–2459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Laucelli, D.B.; Enriquez, L.V.; Ariza, A.D.; Ciliberti, F.G.; Berardi, L.; Giustolisi, O. A digital water strategy based on the digital water service concept to support asset management in a real system. J. Hydroinform. 2023, 25, 2004–2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. WDNetGIS-XL. Available online: http://www.idea-rt.com/digital-water-latest-innovation (accessed on 25 March 2024).
Figure 1. Flow-chart of the structured hydraulic and energy analysis methodology for WDNs.
Figure 1. Flow-chart of the structured hydraulic and energy analysis methodology for WDNs.
Engproc 69 00043 g001
Figure 2. Sternatia–Martignano–Zollino water system.
Figure 2. Sternatia–Martignano–Zollino water system.
Engproc 69 00043 g002
Figure 3. Annual water recovery: (a) energy consumption and (b) total energy recovery.
Figure 3. Annual water recovery: (a) energy consumption and (b) total energy recovery.
Engproc 69 00043 g003
Table 1. Indicators on the use of water resources.
Table 1. Indicators on the use of water resources.
Scenario
Indicator012345
Optimized pressure controlNONOYESYESYESYES
Replacement (%)000162025
Average water supplied volume (m3/year)626699699555543530
Average raised capacity (L/s)20.321.420.217.117.317
Average energy consumption (kWh/year)416436413352355348
Average CO2 emissions (kg CO2/m3)0.690.650.690.660.680.68
Average CO2 emissions in 24 h (kg CO2/day)1183.51238.41174999.11009.3988.7
Average volume of water losses (m3/year)42641333926925724.5
Energy recovery potential (MWh/year)30.332.334.431.430.930.3
Table 2. Summary of results for each optimal rehabilitation plan.
Table 2. Summary of results for each optimal rehabilitation plan.
ScenarioReplacement [%]Cost [EUR]# PipesReplaced Pipes [m]Reduction in Losses [m3/day]Efficiency
[-]
316%22948181289642.35
420%286010010,09611242.20
525%358613512,67813032.04
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ariza, A.; Enriquez, L.; Simone, A.; Ciliberti, F.G.; Laucelli, D.B.; Berardi, L. Assessing the Impact of Asset Management on Energy Recovery: The ENERGIDRICA Project. Eng. Proc. 2024, 69, 43. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024069043

AMA Style

Ariza A, Enriquez L, Simone A, Ciliberti FG, Laucelli DB, Berardi L. Assessing the Impact of Asset Management on Energy Recovery: The ENERGIDRICA Project. Engineering Proceedings. 2024; 69(1):43. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024069043

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ariza, Andres, Laura Enriquez, Antonietta Simone, Francesco G. Ciliberti, Daniele B. Laucelli, and Luigi Berardi. 2024. "Assessing the Impact of Asset Management on Energy Recovery: The ENERGIDRICA Project" Engineering Proceedings 69, no. 1: 43. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024069043

APA Style

Ariza, A., Enriquez, L., Simone, A., Ciliberti, F. G., Laucelli, D. B., & Berardi, L. (2024). Assessing the Impact of Asset Management on Energy Recovery: The ENERGIDRICA Project. Engineering Proceedings, 69(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024069043

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop