Assessing the Impact of Asset Management on Energy Recovery: The ENERGIDRICA Project †
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methodology
2.1. Advanced Hydraulic Modeling
2.2. Methodology to Support the Efficiency of Water Networks
2.3. Case Study
3. Results and Discussion
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Ciliberti, F.G.; Berardi, L.; Laucelli, D.B.; Ariza, A.D.; Enriquez, L.V.; Giustolisi, O. From digital twin paradigm to digital water services. J. Hydroinform. 2023, 25, 2444–2459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Laucelli, D.B.; Enriquez, L.V.; Ariza, A.D.; Ciliberti, F.G.; Berardi, L.; Giustolisi, O. A digital water strategy based on the digital water service concept to support asset management in a real system. J. Hydroinform. 2023, 25, 2004–2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- WDNetGIS-XL. Available online: http://www.idea-rt.com/digital-water-latest-innovation (accessed on 25 March 2024).
Scenario | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Indicator | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
Optimized pressure control | NO | NO | YES | YES | YES | YES |
Replacement (%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 20 | 25 |
Average water supplied volume (m3/year) | 626 | 699 | 699 | 555 | 543 | 530 |
Average raised capacity (L/s) | 20.3 | 21.4 | 20.2 | 17.1 | 17.3 | 17 |
Average energy consumption (kWh/year) | 416 | 436 | 413 | 352 | 355 | 348 |
Average CO2 emissions (kg CO2/m3) | 0.69 | 0.65 | 0.69 | 0.66 | 0.68 | 0.68 |
Average CO2 emissions in 24 h (kg CO2/day) | 1183.5 | 1238.4 | 1174 | 999.1 | 1009.3 | 988.7 |
Average volume of water losses (m3/year) | 426 | 413 | 339 | 269 | 257 | 24.5 |
Energy recovery potential (MWh/year) | 30.3 | 32.3 | 34.4 | 31.4 | 30.9 | 30.3 |
Scenario | Replacement [%] | Cost [EUR] | # Pipes | Replaced Pipes [m] | Reduction in Losses [m3/day] | Efficiency [-] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3 | 16% | 2294 | 81 | 8128 | 964 | 2.35 |
4 | 20% | 2860 | 100 | 10,096 | 1124 | 2.20 |
5 | 25% | 3586 | 135 | 12,678 | 1303 | 2.04 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Ariza, A.; Enriquez, L.; Simone, A.; Ciliberti, F.G.; Laucelli, D.B.; Berardi, L. Assessing the Impact of Asset Management on Energy Recovery: The ENERGIDRICA Project. Eng. Proc. 2024, 69, 43. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024069043
Ariza A, Enriquez L, Simone A, Ciliberti FG, Laucelli DB, Berardi L. Assessing the Impact of Asset Management on Energy Recovery: The ENERGIDRICA Project. Engineering Proceedings. 2024; 69(1):43. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024069043
Chicago/Turabian StyleAriza, Andres, Laura Enriquez, Antonietta Simone, Francesco G. Ciliberti, Daniele B. Laucelli, and Luigi Berardi. 2024. "Assessing the Impact of Asset Management on Energy Recovery: The ENERGIDRICA Project" Engineering Proceedings 69, no. 1: 43. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024069043
APA StyleAriza, A., Enriquez, L., Simone, A., Ciliberti, F. G., Laucelli, D. B., & Berardi, L. (2024). Assessing the Impact of Asset Management on Energy Recovery: The ENERGIDRICA Project. Engineering Proceedings, 69(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024069043