Next Article in Journal
Carbon Capture and Utilization through Biofixation: A Techno-Economic Analysis of a Natural Gas-Fired Power Plant
Previous Article in Journal
Synthesis of Hexamethylenetetramine Mono- and Di(P-Methoxyphenylacetochloride)
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Engineering Proceedings
Volume 71
Issue 1
10.3390/engproc2024071002
engproc-logo
Submit to this Journal
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Statement of Peer Review †

by
Nazmi Sellami
*,
Firdaus Muhammad-Sukki
and
Pablo Sola
School of Computing, Engineering & the Built Environment, Merchiston Campus, Edinburgh Napier University, 10 Colinton Road, Edinburgh EH10 5DT, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
Presented at the 4th Annual Conference Solar and Wind Power, Edinburgh, UK, 4–6 June 2024.
Eng. Proc. 2024, 71(1), 2; https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024071002
Published: 23 September 2024
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 4th Annual Conference Solar and Wind Power)
Versions Notes
In submitting conference proceedings to Engineering Proceedings, the volume editors of the proceedings certify to the publisher that all papers published in this volume have been subjected to peer review administered by the volume editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal.
  • Type of peer review: double-blind.
  • Conference submission management system: Microsoft CMT–Hosted and Scalable Academic Conference Management System.
  • Number of submissions sent for review: 7.
  • Number of submissions accepted: 7.
  • Acceptance rate (number of submissions accepted/number of submissions received): 100%.
  • Average number of reviews per paper: 2.
  • Total number of reviewers involved: 11.
  • Any additional information on the review process: https://cmt3.research.microsoft.com/ASWPC2024/Submission/Manage, accessed on 11 July 2024.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sellami, N.; Muhammad-Sukki, F.; Sola, P. Statement of Peer Review. Eng. Proc. 2024, 71, 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024071002

AMA Style

Sellami N, Muhammad-Sukki F, Sola P. Statement of Peer Review. Engineering Proceedings. 2024; 71(1):2. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024071002

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sellami, Nazmi, Firdaus Muhammad-Sukki, and Pablo Sola. 2024. "Statement of Peer Review" Engineering Proceedings 71, no. 1: 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024071002

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop