Next Article in Journal
Theoretical Model and Practical Pathway for Digital Transformation of Classroom Teaching in Health Education Using Big Data Technology
Previous Article in Journal
Comparison of the Effects of Essential Oils and Antibiotics on Listeria monocytogenes Isolates
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Electrospun Hyaluronan-Based Nanofibers with Mangiferin: Preparation, Morphology, and Drug Release Kinetics †

1
Institute of Advanced Data Transfer Systems, ITMO University, Kronverkskiy Prospekt, 49, bldg. A, Saint Petersburg 197101, Russia
2
Core Shared Research Facilities “Analytical Center”, St. Petersburg State Chemical Pharmaceutical University, 14 Prof. Popov, Saint Petersburg 197376, Russia
3
Progressive Materials and Additive Technologies Center, Kabardino-Balkarian State University Named After H.M. Berbekov, St. Chernyshevsky, 173, Nalchik 360004, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 1st International Online Conference on Bioengineering, 16–18 October 2024; Available online: https://sciforum.net/event/IOCBE2024.
Eng. Proc. 2024, 81(1), 2; https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024081002
Published: 28 November 2024

Abstract

:
The rise in antibiotic-resistant bacterial infections is a major global health concern. The search for natural compounds that inhibit the growth of pathogens is becoming urgent. One such compound is mangiferin, a non-toxic polyphenolic compound derived mainly from Mangifera indica. In addition to antibacterial properties, it exhibits anticancer, antioxidant, immunomodulatory, analgesic and other activities. However, the clinical application of mangiferin is limited by poor solubility and bioavailability. This study describes mangiferin-loaded electrospun nanofibers based on high-molecular-weight hyaluronic acid. The nanofibers improve mangiferin delivery and possess favorable morphological characteristics and drug release kinetics, making them promising candidates for effective antibacterial dressings. This study found that an increase in the mangiferin content of the fibers led to an increase in the average diameter of the fibers. It was also found that nanofibers with different mangiferin content have similar release kinetics with an anomalous non-Fickian transport pattern: most of the mangiferin is released within 10–15 min.

1. Introduction

One of the major global healthcare problems is the strong increase in the spread of resistant bacterial infections [1]. To address this problem, numerous studies are being conducted worldwide to find alternative treatment options. One of these solutions is the use of natural biologically active agents derived from plants with antibacterial properties [2].
Mangiferin (Figure 1) is a non-toxic polyphenolic natural compound present in different plant families in various concentrations, but one of its main sources is Mangifera indica [3,4].
Antibacterial studies have shown that mangiferin is able to inhibit the growth of pathogens from the ESKAPE group, except for the growth of Acinetobacter baumannii [5,6,7,8,9,10]. In addition to antibacterial properties, this polyphenolic compound has numerous pharmacological properties, including antioxidant, antiviral, antidiabetic, anticancer, immunomodulatory, hepatoprotective, analgesic, and anti-aging effects [11]. Therefore, mangiferin is a potent therapeutic agent, but its clinical application is limited due to its poor aqueous solubility (0.111 mg/mL) and bioavailability [12,13]. Various methods have been used to improve the efficacy of the bioactive compound, including the loading of mangiferin into polymeric transport systems [14]. Among such systems, films based on hydroxyethyl cellulose were studied. Such systems showed significant antimicrobial activity against Gram-positive bacteria [15]. Mangiferin was also loaded in core–shell hydrogel beads based on carrageenan and chitosan. The higher the mangiferin content in the beads, the higher the % of release efficiency [16]. In addition, electrospun fibers based on polyurethane and hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose loaded with mangiferin also showed high and dose-dependent antibacterial efficacy [17].
Biopolymer-based nanofibers have recently attracted attention due to their increasing application in the medical field [18,19,20,21]. Such materials are ideal for the use as wound dressings due to their biocompatibility, which results in fewer immunogenic reactions. Hyaluronic acid (HA) is a natural heteropolysaccharide, which, due to properties such as biodegradability, biocompatibility, and mucoadhesiveness, is widely used in targeted drug delivery as well as in various medical applications like ophthalmology, oncology, arthrology, regenerative medicine, and cosmetology [22]. Nanofibers based on this biopolymer promote cell adhesion and cell proliferation and can be used as wound dressings [23]. Moreover, hyaluronic acid nanofibers loaded with a natural compound like curcumin showed antibacterial activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria [24].
This study describes the mangiferin-loaded electrospun nanofibers based on high-molecular-weight hyaluronic acid, their morphological characteristics, and the drug release kinetics of mangiferin from the polymer matrix into PBS with pH = 7.34.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Hyaluronic acid with molecular weight equal to 1.30 MDa was purchased from Rensin Chemicals Limited (Nanjing, China); mangiferin 98% was obtained from abcr GmbH (Karlsruhe, Germany); dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) 99.5% ACS TS 2635-114-44493179-08 was purchased from JSC EKOS-1 (Moscow, Russia); and distilled water GOST R 58144-2018 was obtained using a laboratory distilling apparatus.

2.2. Preparation of Polymer Solution

To prepare the polymer solution, hyaluronic acid was dissolved in binary (equivoluminal) solvent mixture consisting of distilled water/DMSO to obtain a spinning polymer solution with HA concentration equal to 1.9 wt.%. Mangiferin was added into a spinning solution with the weight ratios of HA to mangiferin as follows: 1:0, 25:1, 15:1, and 5:1.

2.3. Electrospinning

Nanofiber formation was performed using electrospinning equipment with the following technological parameters: applied voltage 28 kV, volume flow rate 2 mL/h, distance between electrodes 140 mm, temperature 22.0 ± 2.0 °C, and relative humidity 20.0–25.0%.

2.4. Determination of Morphology and Diameters of Nanofibers

A MIRA3 TESCAN scanning electronic microscope was used to accurately determine the morphology and size distribution of nanofibers. The scanning parameters were as follows: accelerating voltage 2.0 kV, SE detector, and working distance 15.17 mm.

2.5. Digital and Statistical Analysis

The digital analysis of photomicrographs and diameter measurement was conducted using the ImageJ program Version 1.54k (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA). Each nanofibrous sample was analyzed with 2–3 SEM photomicrographs, with 400 measurements taken in total. The diameter distribution was determined using OriginPro 2024b software (OriginLab Corporation, Northampton, MA, USA).

2.6. Drug Loading Capacity and Encapsulation Efficiency

Accurately weighed samples were dissolved in 10.0 mL of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.34). After total dissolution, the solution was filtered through a membrane filter with a pore size of 0.45 μm and analyzed using a UV spectrophotometer Lambda 1050 (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA) at 237 nm from the previously obtained calibration curve for mangiferin in the same media. The drug loading capacity (DL) and encapsulation efficiency (EE) were calculated using the formulae [25,26]:
D L = A m o u n t   o f   m a n g i f e r i n   i n   t h e   H A b a s e d   n a n o f i b e r s A m o u n t   o f   t h e   H A b a s e d   n a n o f i b e r s × 100
E E = A m o u n t   o f   m a n g i f e r i n   i n   t h e   H A b a s e d   n a n o f i b e r s A m o u n t   o f   t h e   i n i t i a l   m a n g i f e r i n × 100
For each mangiferin-loaded nanofiber, the determinations were carried out in triplicate and the results are presented with the standard deviation (SD).

2.7. Evaluation of Mangiferin Release Kinetics from Polymeric Nanofibers

Phosphate-buffered saline (pH 7.34) was used to analyze the kinetics of mangiferin release from hyaluronic acid-based fibers. An accurately weighted nanofibrous sample was immersed in 20 mL of PBS at 37.0 ± 1.0 °C with constant shaking at 100 rpm. An aliquot 1.0 mL was taken at predetermined intervals, and 1.0 mL of fresh PBS was added each time to maintain the total volume. If necessary, the samples were diluted 8–10 times. Spectrophotometry was performed similarly to the previous subsection. The experiment was performed three times for each sample.
To determine the kinetics release of mangiferin from polymeric nanofibers, the most common mathematical models were used, including zero-order, first-order, Higuchi, Hixson–Crowell, Korsmeyer–Peppas, Peppas–Sahlin, and Weibull. The values of the kinetic parameters were obtained by the analysis of the experimental data in OriginPro 2019b (OriginLab Corporation, Northampton, MA, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Morphology of Electrospun Nanofibers

SEM microphotographs of drug-loaded nanofibers with various HA/mangiferin weight ratios are demonstrated in Figure 2.
The diameter distributions histograms of mangiferin-loaded nanofibers with HA/mangiferin weight ratios of 1:0, 25:1, 15:1, and 5:1 were obtained by ImageJ analysis of SEM photomicrographs and are depicted in Figure 3.
As shown in Figure 3, the minimum diameter, average diameter, and range of blank HA nanofibers are equal to 107 nm, 252 nm, and 291 nm, respectively. With increasing mangiferin concentration, the above-mentioned characteristics increase up to 152 nm, 291 nm, and 398 nm, respectively. Thus, the diameter distribution extension is detected. Nanofibers fabricated with a high content of mangiferin have a higher mean diameter in general. The sample with a HA/mangiferin weight ratio of 25:1 (Figure 3b) has a lower mean diameter than the blank nanofibers; however, the blank nanofibers have the lowest minimal and maximal diameters. Additionally, the samples of mangiferin-loaded fibers (HA/mangiferin 5:1) have a wider diameter distribution (397.9 nm, in comparison with 291.3 for blank nanofibers). Also, there is a tendency to form fibers of the same diameter in a narrow range of values when adding mangiferin.

3.2. Drug Loading Capacity and Encapsulation Efficiency

The calculated drug loading capacity (DL) and encapsulation efficiency (EE) are demonstrated in Table 1.
According to Table 1, the encapsulation efficiency of all samples has high value and exceeds the recommended level (70%) [27] in all cases. The polymer matrix capacity depended on the initial mangiferin amount and increased with the increase in mangiferin content.

3.3. Evaluation of Mangiferin Release Kinetics from Polymeric Nanofibers

The mangiferin release profiles into phosphate-buffered saline (pH 7.34) from HA-based electrospun nanofibers are depicted in Figure 4. The kinetic release had a similar profile regardless of the mangiferin content in the samples. Additionally, there was a burst effect: most of mangiferin was released in the first 10–15 min, and then we had a controlled or sustained release from 15 to 60 min. The fast initial release and further stable regime provide us with the possibility of rapid anti-inflammatory and antibacterial activity and could be used in modern medicine as a potential antibacterial wound dressing.
The mechanism of mangiferin release from hyaluronic acid-based nanofibers can be analyzed by comparing the experimental data about mangiferin release with various mathematical models of drug release kinetics, including zero-order, first-order, Higuchi, Hixson–Crowell, Korsmeyer–Peppas, Peppas–Sahlin, and Weibull models. These models were applied to the release profile of mangiferin from electrospun nanofibers. The results of the calculation of the key parameters are demonstrated in Table 2.
The Korsmeyer–Peppas (up to 60% released mangiferin), Peppas–Sahlin, and Weibull models are the most suitable mathematical descriptions of the mangiferin release kinetics from polymeric matrixes based on hyaluronic acid. The value of the diffusional exponent n in the Korsmeyer–Peppas model for all analyzed samples falls within the range 0.45 < n < 0.89, that indicates an anomalous non-Fickian mechanism of mangiferin diffusion from the nanofibers [28,29]. Such an anomalous mechanism of mangiferin release in this case could be attributed to the hydrophilic nature of hyaluronic acid, the rapid swelling of the polymer matrix, and the similar orders of solvent diffusion rate and polymer relaxation rate [30].
In the Weibull equation, the parameter β characterizes the shape of the release curve. Thus, if β = 1.0, the release curve is exponential; if β > 1.0, it is sigmoidal; and in the case of β < 1.0, it is parabolic [31,32]. For the analyzed hyaluronic acid-based nanofibers, the shape parameter β is less than 1.0, which corresponds to the parabolic profile of the mangiferin release. In addition, the value 0.59 < β < 1.13 for all samples indicates an anomalous non-Fickian transport pattern of mangiferin release from the nanofibers [33]. This model is flexible and allows us to describe complex systems, including those based on hydrophilic polymers that have the ability to swell during the release of biologically active agents loaded into the polymer matrix.

4. Conclusions

The demand for alternative substances with antimicrobial activity is growing due to the increasing resistance of pathogenic bacterial strains and bans on the use of antibiotics in agriculture. Mangiferin, in particular, being a natural compound, has antimicrobial, antioxidant, and immunomodulatory properties. In our study, we embedded mangiferin in hyaluronic acid nanofibers obtained by electrospinning. It was found that increasing the concentration of mangiferin in the matrix led to an increase in the average diameter of the nanofibers. However, the difference between the largest and smallest fiber diameter did not exceed 25% of the smallest diameter. It is also possible that this effect is in part mediated by the particularities of the electrospinning method. The data from the mangiferin release experiment show that hyaluronic acid nanofibers release most of the mangiferin within 10–15 min, which makes it difficult to use such nanofibers as long-lasting matrices; however, they may be very useful for urgent medical treatment. Mangiferin release from the polymer nanofibers has an anomalous non-Fickian transport pattern. The data obtained can be used both for the further study of mangiferin and its properties and for the development of polymeric matrices for the delivery of drugs with prolonged action.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.M. and P.S. (Petr Snetkov); methodology, Y.G., S.M. and P.S. (Petr Snetkov); formal analysis, R.S. and V.K.; investigation, V.K., Y.G., M.D. and P.S. (Petr Snetkov); resources, P.S. (Petr Snetkov); data curation, P.S. (Petr Snetkov); writing—original draft preparation, R.S., V.K., P.S. (Polina Serbun) and A.K.; writing—review and editing, S.M., Y.G. and P.S. (Petr Snetkov); visualization, R.S., V.K., M.D. and P.S. (Petr Snetkov); supervision, S.M. and P.S. (Petr Snetkov); validation, P.S. (Polina Serbun); project administration, P.S. (Petr Snetkov); funding acquisition, P.S. (Petr Snetkov) All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Russian Science Foundation, project number 24-23-00269. Link to information about the project: https://rscf.ru/en/project/24-23-00269/ (accessed on 27 November 2024).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Salam, M.A.; Al-Amin, M.Y.; Salam, M.T.; Pawar, J.S.; Akhter, N.; Rabaan, A.A.; Alqumber, M.A.A. Antimicrobial Resistance: A Growing Serious Threat for Global Public Health. Healthcare 2023, 11, 1946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Khameneh, B.; Iranshahy, M.; Soheili, V.; Bazzaz, B.S.F. Review on Plant Antimicrobials: A Mechanistic Viewpoint. Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Control 2019, 8, 118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Barreto, J.C.; Trevisan, M.T.S.; Hull, W.E.; Erben, G.; De Brito, E.S.; Pfundstein, B.; Würtele, G.; Spiegelhalder, B.; Owen, R.W. Characterization and Quantitation of Polyphenolic Compounds in Bark, Kernel, Leaves, and Peel of Mango (Mangifera indica L.). J. Agric. Food Chem. 2008, 56, 5599–5610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Hou, S.; Wang, F.; Li, Y.; Li, Y.; Wang, M.; Sun, D.; Sun, C. Pharmacokinetic Study of Mangiferin in Human Plasma after Oral Administration. Food Chem. 2011, 132, 289–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Mahalakshmi, K.; Pushpangadan, S.; Padmavathy, K.; Vivekanandan, P.; Sukumaran, V.; Subbiya, A. Antibacterial Efficacy of Mangifera indica L. Kernel and Ocimum sanctum L. Leaves against Enterococcus Faecalis Dentinal Biofilm. J. Conserv. Dent. 2013, 16, 454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Mazlan, N.A.; Azman, S.; Ghazali, N.F.; Yusri, P.Z.S.; Idi, H.M.; Ismail, M.; Sekar, M. Synergistic Antibacterial Activity of Mangiferin with Antibiotics against Staphylococcus aureus. Drug Invent. Today 2019, 12, 14–17. [Google Scholar]
  7. Sarker, A.; Amin, N.; Shimu, I.J.; Akhter, M.P.; Alam, M.A.; Rahman, M.M.; Sultana, H. Antimicrobial Activity of Methanolic Extract of Langra Mango Pulp. J. Pharmacog. Phytochem. 2017, 6, 28–30. [Google Scholar]
  8. Nguyen, H.T.; Miyamoto, A.; Hoang, H.T.; Vu, T.T.T.; Pothinuch, P.; Nguyen, H.T.T. Effects of Maturation on Antibacterial Properties of Vietnamese Mango (Mangifera indica) Leaves. Molecules 2024, 29, 1443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Thambi, P.A.; John, S.; Lydia, E.; Iyer, P.; Monica, S.J. Antimicrobial Efficacy of Mango Peel Powder and For-mulation of Recipes Using Mango Peel Powder (Mangifera indica L.). Int. J. Home Sci. 2016, 2, 155–161. [Google Scholar]
  10. Vasudevan, A.; Kesavan, D.K.; Wu, L.; Su, Z.; Wang, S.; Ramasamy, M.K.; Hopper, W.; Xu, H. In Silico and In Vitro Screening of Natural Compounds as Broad-Spectrum β-Lactamase Inhibitors against Acinetobacter Baumannii New Delhi Metallo-β-Lactamase-1 (NDM-1). BioMed Res. Int. 2022, 2022, 4230788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Jangra, A.; Arora, M.K.; Kisku, A.; Sharma, S. The Multifaceted Role of Mangiferin in Health and Diseases: A Review. Adv. Tradit. Med. 2020, 21, 619–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wang, Z.; Deng, J.; Li, X.; Wang, Q. Dissoluble Mangiferin Inclusion Compound and Its Preparation Method. Chinese Patent CN101019877-A, 22 March 2007. [Google Scholar]
  13. Allaw, M.; Pleguezuelos-Villa, M.; Manca, M.L.; Caddeo, C.; Aroffu, M.; Nacher, A.; Diez-Sales, O.; Saurí, A.R.; Ferrer, E.E.; Fadda, A.M.; et al. Innovative Strategies to Treat Skin Wounds with Mangiferin: Fabrication of Transfersomes Modified with Glycols and Mucin. Nanomedicine 2020, 15, 1671–1685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Morozkina, S.N.; Vu, T.H.N.; Generalova, Y.E.; Snetkov, P.P.; Uspenskaya, M.V. Mangiferin as New Potential Anti-Cancer Agent and Mangiferin-Integrated Polymer Systems—A Novel Research Direction. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Tohamy, H.-A.S.; El-Sakhawy, M.; El-Masry, H.M.; Saleh, I.A.; AbdelMohsen, M.M. Preparation of Hydroxyethyl Cellulose/Mangiferin Edible Films and Their Antimicrobial Properties. BMC Chem. 2022, 16, 113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Athipornchai, A.; Pabunrueang, P.; Trakulsujaritchok, T. Mangiferin Loaded Carrageenan/Chitosan Core-Shell Hydrogel Beads: Preparation, Characterization and Proposed Application. Food Hydrocoll. 2023, 147, 109394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Al-Naymi, H.A.S.; Mahmoudi, E.; Kamil, M.M.; Almajidi, Y.Q.; Al-Musawi, M.H.; Mohammadzadeh, V.; Ghorbani, M.; Moghadam, F.M. A Novel Designed Nanofibrous Mat Based on Hydroxypropyl Methyl Cellulose Incorporating Mango Peel Extract for Potential Use in Wound Care System. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 259, 129159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Abadi, B.; Goshtasbi, N.; Bolourian, S.; Tahsili, J.; Adeli-Sardou, M.; Forootanfar, H. Electrospun Hybrid Nanofibers: Fabrication, Characterization, and Biomedical Applications. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2022, 10, 986975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Jeevanandam, J.; Pan, S.; Rodrigues, J.; Elkodous, M.A.; Danquah, M.K. Medical Applications of Biopolymer Nanofibers. Biomater. Sci. 2022, 10, 4107–4118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Deshmukh, S.; Kathiresan, M.; Kulandainathan, M.A. A Review on Biopolymer-Derived Electrospun Nanofibers for Biomedical and Antiviral Applications. Biomater. Sci. 2022, 10, 4424–4442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Syed, M.H.; Khan, M.M.R.; Zahari, M.A.K.M.; Beg, M.D.H.; Abdullah, N. A Review on Current Trends and Future Prospectives of Electrospun Biopolymeric Nanofibers for Biomedical Applications. Eur. Polym. J. 2023, 197, 112352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Fallacara, A.; Baldini, E.; Manfredini, S.; Vertuani, S. Hyaluronic Acid in the Third Millennium. Polymers 2018, 10, 701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Uppal, R.; Ramaswamy, G.N.; Arnold, C.; Goodband, R.; Wang, Y. Hyaluronic Acid Nanofiber Wound Dressing—Production, Characterization, and in Vivo Behavior. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater. 2011, 97B, 20–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Snetkov, P.; Rogacheva, E.; Kremleva, A.; Morozkina, S.; Uspenskaya, M.; Kraeva, L. In-Vitro Antibacterial Activity of Curcumin-Loaded Nanofibers Based on Hyaluronic Acid against Multidrug-Resistant ESKAPE Pathogens. Pharmaceutics 2022, 14, 1186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Thien, D.V. Electrospun Chitosan/PVA Nanofibers for Drug Delivery. Vietnam J. Sci. Technol. 2018, 54, 185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Fallacara, A.; Marchetti, F.; Pozzoli, M.; Citernesi, U.R.; Manfredini, S.; Vertuani, S. Formulation and Characterization of Native and Crosslinked Hyaluronic Acid Microspheres for Dermal Delivery of Sodium Ascorbyl Phosphate: A Comparative Study. Pharmaceutics 2018, 10, 254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yeo, Y.; Park, K. Control of Encapsulation Efficiency and Initial Burst in Polymeric Microparticle Systems. Arch. Pharm. Res. 2004, 27, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ahmed, L.; Atif, R.; Eldeen, T.; Yahya, I.; Omara, A.; Eltayeb, M. Study the Using of Nanoparticles as Drug Delivery System Based on Mathematical Models for Controlled Release. JLTEMAS 2019, 8, 52–56. [Google Scholar]
  29. Ritger, P.L.; Peppas, N.A. A simple equation for description of solute release II. Fickian and anomalous release from swellable devices. J. Control. Release 1987, 5, 37–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Masaro, L.; Zhu, X. Physical models of diffusion for polymer solutions, gels and solids. Prog. Polym. Sci. 1999, 24, 731–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Papadopoulou, V.; Kosmidis, K.; Vlachou, M.; Macheras, P. On the use of the Weibull function for the discernment of drug release mechanisms. Int. J. Pharm. 2006, 309, 44–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Rohani, S.A.; Hemmatinejad, N.; Bahrami, S.H.; Bashari, A. A comparison between solvent casting and electrospinning methods for the fabrication of neem extract-containing buccal films. J. Ind. Text. 2022, 51 (Suppl. 1), 311S–335S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Martín-Camacho, U.J.; Rodríguez-Barajas, N.; Sánchez-Burgos, J.A.; Pérez-Larios, A. Weibull β value for the discernment of drug release mechanism of PLGA particles. Int. J. Pharm. 2023, 640, 123017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Structural formula of mangiferin.
Figure 1. Structural formula of mangiferin.
Engproc 81 00002 g001
Figure 2. (a) SEM microphotographs of electrospun nanofibers: blank nanofibers; (b) mangiferin-loaded nanofibers (HA/mangiferin = 25:1); (c) mangiferin-loaded nanofibers (HA/mangiferin = 15:1); (d) mangiferin-loaded nanofibers (HA/mangiferin = 5:1).
Figure 2. (a) SEM microphotographs of electrospun nanofibers: blank nanofibers; (b) mangiferin-loaded nanofibers (HA/mangiferin = 25:1); (c) mangiferin-loaded nanofibers (HA/mangiferin = 15:1); (d) mangiferin-loaded nanofibers (HA/mangiferin = 5:1).
Engproc 81 00002 g002
Figure 3. (a) Results of statistical analysis of fiber diameter: blank HA-nanofibers; (b) nanofibers containing hyaluronic acid/mangiferin = 25:1; (c) nanofibers containing hyaluronic acid/mangiferin = 15:1; (d) nanofibers containing hyaluronic acid/mangiferin = 5:1.
Figure 3. (a) Results of statistical analysis of fiber diameter: blank HA-nanofibers; (b) nanofibers containing hyaluronic acid/mangiferin = 25:1; (c) nanofibers containing hyaluronic acid/mangiferin = 15:1; (d) nanofibers containing hyaluronic acid/mangiferin = 5:1.
Engproc 81 00002 g003
Figure 4. Results of an experiment on the release of mangiferin from hyaluronic acid fibers. Data are presented for samples MNG:HA = 1:25; MNG:HA = 1:15; and MNG:HA = 1:5.
Figure 4. Results of an experiment on the release of mangiferin from hyaluronic acid fibers. Data are presented for samples MNG:HA = 1:25; MNG:HA = 1:15; and MNG:HA = 1:5.
Engproc 81 00002 g004
Table 1. Experimentally determined and theoretical values of drug loading capacity and encapsulation efficiency. Data are presented for samples MNG:HA = 1:25; MNG:HA = 1:15; and MNG:HA = 1:5 (n = 3, ±SD).
Table 1. Experimentally determined and theoretical values of drug loading capacity and encapsulation efficiency. Data are presented for samples MNG:HA = 1:25; MNG:HA = 1:15; and MNG:HA = 1:5 (n = 3, ±SD).
Sample NamePolymer Matrix Capacity, %Encapsulation Efficiency, %
TheoreticalExperimentalTheoreticalExperimental
HA_253.852.78 ± 0.25~100.071.49 ± 6.64
HA_156.255.82 ± 0.96~100.085.79 ± 10.01
HA_516.6714.74 ± 0.28~100.081.68 ± 13.53
Table 2. Kinetic parameters of mangiferin release from nanofibers.
Table 2. Kinetic parameters of mangiferin release from nanofibers.
Model and ParametersSample Name
HA_25HA_15HA_5
Zero-orderK00.031930.063940.18515
R20.475330.432840.38877
First-orderKF0.010510.00930.00666
R20.496730.46160.33961
HiguchiKH0.48561.035522.60798
R20.546920.455560.22509
Hixson–CrowellKS−0.01064−0.02131−0.04554
R20.475330.432840.32487
Korsmeyer–Peppas
(Qt/Q0 < 0.6)
KK0.240520.252680.26158
n0.581710.603160.74067
R20.994560.994250.99933
Korsmeyer–Peppas
(all data)
KK0.448860.489820.58548
n0.212710.191010.14669
R20.952840.948860.93256
Peppas–SahlinK10.356980.40340.4807
K2−0.03157−0.04025−0.05609
m0.462120.434040.41491
R20.989350.984120.98213
Weibullα0.28720.312060.32284
β0.743280.75710.88384
R20.996970.994510.99503
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Shaikenov, R.; Klimshina, V.; Generalova, Y.; Serbun, P.; Kosova, A.; Dorogov, M.; Morozkina, S.; Snetkov, P. Electrospun Hyaluronan-Based Nanofibers with Mangiferin: Preparation, Morphology, and Drug Release Kinetics. Eng. Proc. 2024, 81, 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024081002

AMA Style

Shaikenov R, Klimshina V, Generalova Y, Serbun P, Kosova A, Dorogov M, Morozkina S, Snetkov P. Electrospun Hyaluronan-Based Nanofibers with Mangiferin: Preparation, Morphology, and Drug Release Kinetics. Engineering Proceedings. 2024; 81(1):2. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024081002

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shaikenov, Roman, Vladislava Klimshina, Yuliya Generalova, Polina Serbun, Anna Kosova, Maksim Dorogov, Svetlana Morozkina, and Petr Snetkov. 2024. "Electrospun Hyaluronan-Based Nanofibers with Mangiferin: Preparation, Morphology, and Drug Release Kinetics" Engineering Proceedings 81, no. 1: 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024081002

APA Style

Shaikenov, R., Klimshina, V., Generalova, Y., Serbun, P., Kosova, A., Dorogov, M., Morozkina, S., & Snetkov, P. (2024). Electrospun Hyaluronan-Based Nanofibers with Mangiferin: Preparation, Morphology, and Drug Release Kinetics. Engineering Proceedings, 81(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024081002

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop