A Concise Review of Carbon Dioxide Storage in Depleted Oil Fields of Prinos in Northern Greece †
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Carbon Capture Storage in Prinos, Greece
CCS Technology Steps
3. Necessary Characteristics of the Candidate Tank
- Injection. A storage system can potentially include more than one reservoir of rocks characterized by different physicochemical properties. The content of a reservoir rock can be estimated through direct or indirect techniques [13]. The majority of Prinos, Epsilon, and Ammodis traps are bound in a densely faulted region as overturning anticlines. The Prinos basin, i.e., the northern part of all the traps, is 38 km long and about 20 km wide, while the southern part, which is deeper, forms the Prinos sub-basin [14]. The above basin includes three main filling series with very distinct boundaries between them: the pre-evaporative, evaporative, and post-evaporative series [15]. The mineralogical composition of the reservoirs in the basin consists of sandstones and some claystones. The inert thickness reaches about 260 m, while the depth from the surface to the top of the reservoir varies from 1 to 3.5 km. The ability to inject and maintain CO2 in its supercritical state is supported by the average permeability of the reservoir intervals reaching 50 mD and porosity ranging from 15% to 20% [3];
- Capacity. It has been calculated that the sequestration capacity in the Prinos oil zones amounts to 14.3 billion m3 and in the aquifers to 18 billion m3, shaping the total CO2 sequestration capacity of the Prinos reservoirs to 32.3 billion m3. The development of the Epsilon and Eastern Thassos deposits will increase more than double the storage capacity, resulting in an increase in the CO2 sequestration capacity of Greek greenhouse emissions to 31% [16];
- Safety. The anticlines that comprise the Prinos basin are covered with salt deposits and overlying clastic unconsolidated sediments with a thickness of 2300 m, offering excellent sealing and, by extension, security in CO2 storage [3]. To ensure proper transfer and detect potential leaks during injection, developing a subsea CO2 detection sensor for a novel use of existing data to reduce requirements for seismic data acquisition is required [17];
- Accessibility. CO2 can be transported via pipelines, ships, trains, and trucks. Due to economies of scale, pipelines and ships are expected to be much more cost-effective in transporting megatons of CO2 per year (Mtpa) [18]. In the case of storage in the facilities of Prinos, the transport through pipelines is chosen due to their ability to transport large quantities of CO2 in its liquefied or extremely critical/dense phase. Under these conditions, CO2 has a higher density, while final storage conditions will be similar to those of transport due to the high hydrostatic pressure in the underground porous rock formations [19].
4. Total Cost and Alternative Perspectives
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Price, J.; Smith, B. Geological Storage of Carbon Dioxide: Staying Safe Underground; IEA: Paris, France, 2008; pp. 1–12. [Google Scholar]
- Simões, H. Climate Action in Greece European Parliament. 2021. Available online: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2021/690685/EPRS_BRI(2021)690685_EN.pdf (accessed on 3 July 2023).
- Koukouzas, N.; Ziogou, F.; Gemeni, V. Preliminary assessment of CO2 geological storage opportunities in Greece. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 2009, 3, 502–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koukouzas, N.; Typou, I. An assessment of CO2 transportation cost from the power plants to geological formations suitable for storage in North Greece. Energy Procedia 2009, 1, 1657–1663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- HEREMA. Building a Bridge to a Carbon Free Future. 2023. Available online: https://herema.gr/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Final-herema.companyprofile-digital.17a-EN-1.pdf (accessed on 28 June 2023).
- National Energy Technology Laboratory. Carbon Storage, Faqs. Available online: https://www.netl.doe.gov/carbon-management/carbon-storage/faqs/carbon-storage-faqs (accessed on 27 June 2023).
- Ktenas, D.; Kosmidou, V.; Spinos, S. Underground Geological Storage of CO2 and Natural Gas in Greece, HEREMA. 6–8. 2020. Available online: https://www.greekhydrocarbons.gr/news_files/Technical_report_CCS_June_2020.pdf (accessed on 13 August 2023).
- Czarnota, R.; Knapik, E.; Wojnarowski, P.; Janiga, D.; Stopa, J. Carbon Dioxide Separation Technologies. Arch. Min. Sci. 2019, 64, 487–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karakas, E.; Doukelis, A.; Koukouzas, N. CO2 Capture and Storage in the Electricity Generation Sector, Institute of Energy (IENE). 12–13. 2011. Available online: https://www.iene.gr/articlefiles/eniaio_kakaras_04022011.pdf (accessed on 27 June 2023).
- Allangawi, A.; Alzaimoor, E.; Shanaah, H. Carbon Capture Materials in Post-Combustion: Adsorption and Absorption-Based Processes. 2023. Available online: https://www.mdpi.com/2311-5629/9/1/17 (accessed on 1 July 2023).
- Stanger, R.; Wall, T.; Sporl, R.; Paneru, M. Oxy–fuel combustion for CO2 capture in power plants. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 2015, 40, 55–125. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1750583615002637 (accessed on 29 June 2023). [CrossRef]
- Metz, B.; Davidson, O.; Coninck, H.; Loos, M.; Meyer, L. Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2005; pp. 105–179. Available online: https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/03/srccs_wholereport.pdf (accessed on 25 June 2023).
- Arvanitis, A.; Koutsovitis, P.; Koukouzas, N.; Tyrologou, P.; Karapanos, D.; Karkalis, C.; Pomonis, P. Potential Sites for Underground Energy and CO2 Storage in Greece: A Geological and Petrological Approach. Energies 2020, 13, 2707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Proedrou, P.; Papaconstantinou, C.M. Prinos Basin—A Model for Oil Exploration. In Proceedings of the 10th International Congress of Geological Society of Greece. Bulletin of the Geological Society of Greece, Thessaloniki, Greece, 15–17 July 2004; pp. 327–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mertzanides, Y.; Kargiotis, E.; Mitropoulos, A. Geological and Geophysical Data of “Epsilon” Field in Prinos Oil Basin. In Proceedings of the 12th International Congress of Geological Society of Greece, Patras, Greece, 19–22 May 2010; pp. 2257–2264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tingas, J.; Logothetis, S.; Tingas, A. Synergies and Environmental Benefits of Lignite Gasification in Ptolemais with Combined CO2 Sequestration and Enhanced Oil Recovery in the Prinos Oil Fields in Macedonia-Greece. In Proceedings of the Canadian International Petroleum Conference, Petroleum Society, Calgary, AB, Canada, 17–19 June 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Danish Offshore Technology Center. CO2 Storage in Depleted Oil and Gas Fields. Available online: https://offshore.dtu.dk/english/research/research-programmes/co2-storage (accessed on 24 June 2023).
- Smith, E.; Morris, J.; Kheshgi, H.; Teletzke, G.; Herzog, H.; Paltsev, S. The Cost of CO2 Transport and Storage in Global Integrated Assessment Modeling. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 2021, 109, 103367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koukouzas, N.; Klimantos, P.; Stogiannis, P.; Karakas, E. CO2 capture and storage in Greece: A case study from komotini ngcc power plant. Therm. Sci. 2006, 10, 71–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Energean PLC. Sustainability Report 2021, Uniting Diverse Cultures for a Sustainable Energy Transition. Available online: https://www.energean.com/media/5201/2021-sustainability-report.pdf (accessed on 14 August 2023).
- Offshore Engineer. Energean Hires Halliburton for Carbon Storage Project Offshore Greece. 2022. Available online: https://www.oedigital.com/news/495321-energean-hires-halliburton-for-carbon-storage-project-offshore-greece (accessed on 22 July 2023).
Pipeline | Length (km) | Diameter (inch) | Investment Cost ($) | Operation Cost ($) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kardia–Agios Dimitrios | 15 | 24 | 4.8 million | 7.66 million |
Agios Dimitrios–Nea Karvali | 350 | 30 | 128.8 million | 1.6 million |
Nea Karvali–Prinos | 20 | 34 | 24.2 million | 1.2 million |
Komotini–Nea Karvali | 150 | 16 | 24.4 million | 667 thousand |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Avraam, G.C.; Vatalis, K.I. A Concise Review of Carbon Dioxide Storage in Depleted Oil Fields of Prinos in Northern Greece. Mater. Proc. 2023, 15, 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/materproc2023015018
Avraam GC, Vatalis KI. A Concise Review of Carbon Dioxide Storage in Depleted Oil Fields of Prinos in Northern Greece. Materials Proceedings. 2023; 15(1):18. https://doi.org/10.3390/materproc2023015018
Chicago/Turabian StyleAvraam, Georgios C., and Konstantinos I. Vatalis. 2023. "A Concise Review of Carbon Dioxide Storage in Depleted Oil Fields of Prinos in Northern Greece" Materials Proceedings 15, no. 1: 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/materproc2023015018