Next Article in Journal
Sharing Information for Wildfire Risk Management: The MEDSTAR Platform
Previous Article in Journal
RISICO, An Enhanced Forest Fire Danger Rating System: Validation on 2021 Extreme Wildfire Season in Southern Italy
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Abstract

Physical and Non-Physical Fire-Spotting Models: A Comparison Study by a Wildfire Simulator Based on a Cellular Automata Approach †

by
Marcos López-De-Castro
1,*,
Andrea Trucchia
2,
Paolo Fiorucci
2 and
Gianni Pagnini
1,3
1
BCAM-Basque Center for Applied Mathematics, Alameda de Mazarredo 14, 48009 Bilbao, Spain
2
CIMA Research Foundation, 17100 Savona, Italy
3
Ikerbasque-Basque Foundation for Science, Plaza Euskadi 5, 48009 Bilbao, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the Third International Conference on Fire Behavior and Risk, Sardinia, Italy, 3–6 May 2022.
Environ. Sci. Proc. 2022, 17(1), 27; https://doi.org/10.3390/environsciproc2022017027
Published: 9 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The Third International Conference on Fire Behavior and Risk)

Abstract

:
Wildfire propagation is a non-linear and multiscale system in which multiple physical and chemical processes are involved. One critical mechanism in the spread of wildfires is so-called fire-spotting: a random phenomenon that occurs when embers are transported over large distances by the wind, causing the start of new spotting ignitions that jeopardize firefighting actions. Due to its nature, fire-spotting is usually modelled as a probabilistic process. In this work, the physical parametrization of fire-spotting RandomFront has been implemented into the operational wildfire spread simulator PROPAGATOR, which is based on a cellular automata approach. In the RandomFront parametrization, the downwind landing distribution of firebrands is modelled by the means of a lognormal distribution, which is parameterized taking into account the physics involved in the phenomenon. The considered physical parameters are wind field, fire-line intensity, fuel density, firebrand radius, maximum loftable height, as well as factors related to atmospheric stability and flame geometry. The results are compared against an already established fire-spotting empirical submodel for cellular automata-based wildfire models. Preliminary results show that the RandomFront parametrization on the one hand reproduces the main spotting effects given by the available literature model, while on the other hand, it generates a variety of fire-spotting situations as well as long range fluctuations of the burning probability. The physical parametrization allows for complex patterns of fire spreading in this operational simulator context.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.L.-D.-C., A.T., P.F. and G.P.; methodology, M.L.-D.-C.; software, M.L.-D.-C. and A.T.; validation, M.L.-D.-C.; formal analysis, M.L.-D.-C.; investigation, M.L.-D.-C., A.T., P.F. and G.P.; resources, A.T., P.F. and G.P.; data curation, M.L.-D.-C. and A.T.; writing—original draft preparation, M.L.-D.-C.; writing—review and editing, M.L.-D.-C., A.T., P.F. and G.P.; visualization, M.L.-D.-C.; supervision, A.T., P.F. and G.P.; project administration, P.F. and G.P.; funding acquisition, P.F. and G.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research has been supported by the Basque Government through the BERC 2022–2025 programme; by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO) through the BCAM Severo Ochoa excellence accreditation SEV-2017-0718 and through the project PID2019-107685RB-I00; by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) and the Department of Education of the regional government, the Junta of Castilla y León, (Grant contract SA089P20).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The georeferenced data produced with PROPAGATOR and the scripts developed to perform the analysis of the data can be found here: https://gitlab.bcamath.org/malopez/fire-spotting.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare not conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

López-De-Castro, M.; Trucchia, A.; Fiorucci, P.; Pagnini, G. Physical and Non-Physical Fire-Spotting Models: A Comparison Study by a Wildfire Simulator Based on a Cellular Automata Approach. Environ. Sci. Proc. 2022, 17, 27. https://doi.org/10.3390/environsciproc2022017027

AMA Style

López-De-Castro M, Trucchia A, Fiorucci P, Pagnini G. Physical and Non-Physical Fire-Spotting Models: A Comparison Study by a Wildfire Simulator Based on a Cellular Automata Approach. Environmental Sciences Proceedings. 2022; 17(1):27. https://doi.org/10.3390/environsciproc2022017027

Chicago/Turabian Style

López-De-Castro, Marcos, Andrea Trucchia, Paolo Fiorucci, and Gianni Pagnini. 2022. "Physical and Non-Physical Fire-Spotting Models: A Comparison Study by a Wildfire Simulator Based on a Cellular Automata Approach" Environmental Sciences Proceedings 17, no. 1: 27. https://doi.org/10.3390/environsciproc2022017027

APA Style

López-De-Castro, M., Trucchia, A., Fiorucci, P., & Pagnini, G. (2022). Physical and Non-Physical Fire-Spotting Models: A Comparison Study by a Wildfire Simulator Based on a Cellular Automata Approach. Environmental Sciences Proceedings, 17(1), 27. https://doi.org/10.3390/environsciproc2022017027

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop