Physical and Non-Physical Fire-Spotting Models: A Comparison Study by a Wildfire Simulator Based on a Cellular Automata Approach †
Abstract
:Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
López-De-Castro, M.; Trucchia, A.; Fiorucci, P.; Pagnini, G. Physical and Non-Physical Fire-Spotting Models: A Comparison Study by a Wildfire Simulator Based on a Cellular Automata Approach. Environ. Sci. Proc. 2022, 17, 27. https://doi.org/10.3390/environsciproc2022017027
López-De-Castro M, Trucchia A, Fiorucci P, Pagnini G. Physical and Non-Physical Fire-Spotting Models: A Comparison Study by a Wildfire Simulator Based on a Cellular Automata Approach. Environmental Sciences Proceedings. 2022; 17(1):27. https://doi.org/10.3390/environsciproc2022017027
Chicago/Turabian StyleLópez-De-Castro, Marcos, Andrea Trucchia, Paolo Fiorucci, and Gianni Pagnini. 2022. "Physical and Non-Physical Fire-Spotting Models: A Comparison Study by a Wildfire Simulator Based on a Cellular Automata Approach" Environmental Sciences Proceedings 17, no. 1: 27. https://doi.org/10.3390/environsciproc2022017027
APA StyleLópez-De-Castro, M., Trucchia, A., Fiorucci, P., & Pagnini, G. (2022). Physical and Non-Physical Fire-Spotting Models: A Comparison Study by a Wildfire Simulator Based on a Cellular Automata Approach. Environmental Sciences Proceedings, 17(1), 27. https://doi.org/10.3390/environsciproc2022017027