Next Article in Journal
Flammability and Combustibility of Some Mediterranean Species Related with Forest Fires in Croatia
Previous Article in Journal
Fires’ Impact on Olive Orchards in Kabylia (North of Algeria): Use of GIS and Remote Sensing
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Abstract

Optimum Allocation of Firebreaks Networks during the Design Process in Golestan National Park, Northeastern Iran †

by
Mhd Wathek Alhaj Khalaf
1,2,*,
Shaban Shataee-Jouibary
1 and
Roghayeh Jahdi
3,4
1
Faculty of Forest Sciences, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, 49138-15739 Gorgan, Iran
2
Department of Renewable Natural Resources and Environment, University of Aleppo, 12212 Aleppo, Syria
3
Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, 56199-11367 Ardabil, Iran
4
National Research Council, Institute of BioEconomy (CNR-IBE), 07100 Li Punti, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the Third International Conference on Fire Behavior and Risk, Sardinia, Italy, 3–6 May 2022.
Environ. Sci. Proc. 2022, 17(1), 41; https://doi.org/10.3390/environsciproc2022017041
Published: 9 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The Third International Conference on Fire Behavior and Risk)
Due to their increasing frequency wildfires and the area burned in natural areas, wildfires are becoming increasingly challenging to control. Firebreaks are an effective method to stop the spread of wildfires. To find the optimal allocation of firebreaks, a weight-linear combination (WLC) with an AHP fuzzy method was used to allocate optimum fuel breaks networks in the Golestan National Park in northeastern Iran. The effective factors that may impact the designing of firebreaks, including climate, topography, fuel, and fire behavior characteristics, were determined. The WindNinja simulator was used to create wind direction and speed layers based on the prevailing wind direction (250°) and three wind-speed scenarios (low = 6, medium = 12, and high = 18 mph). FlamMap (basic FB and MTT algorithms) was used to predict potential characteristics of fire behavior, including burn probability, rate of spread, flame length, and fireline intensity, under constant weather and fuel moisture conditions, using historic ignition points in the most recent ten years in the study area. Furthermore, the suitability map of the fuel-break allocation was determined by the AHP weights and the weighted linear combination (WLC) method and was considered effective (Table 1).
The firebreaks network was designed and allocated to the study area based on the suitability firebreak allocation map. To evaluate firebreaks performance across the landscape, four historical large fires (>100 ha) were simulated to investigate the effectiveness of the firebreaks with the Kappa coefficient corresponding index. An analysis of the AHP questionnaire showed that the fuel characteristics, the distance of barriers, and wind factors are the most effective criteria in firebreak allocation, with an inconsistency rate of 0.02. In addition, the evaluation of the suggested firebreaks showed the ability of fire breaks to stop the spread of fire (Kappa coefficient: 0.50, 0.43, 0.48, 0.61) (Figure 1).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.W.A.K. and S.S.-J.; methodology, M.W.A.K. and R.J.; software, M.W.A.K.; validation, M.W.A.K., R.J. and S.S.-J.; formal analysis, M.W.A.K. and R.J.; investigation, M.W.A.K.; resources, M.W.A.K.; data curation, M.W.A.K.; writing—original draft preparation, M.W.A.K.; writing—review and editing, M.W.A.K., R.J. and S.S.-J.; visualization, M.W.A.K.; supervision, S.S.-J.; project administration, S.S.-J.; funding acquisition, M.W.A.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figure 1. Effect of suggested fuel breaks network on fire spread.
Figure 1. Effect of suggested fuel breaks network on fire spread.
Environsciproc 17 00041 g001
Table 1. Final weights of effective criteria for allocating fire break network.
Table 1. Final weights of effective criteria for allocating fire break network.
CriteriaWeightSub CriteriaWeightFinal Weight
Topography0.161Aspect0.410.06601
Slope0.590.09499
Elevation00
Fire history0.164Burned area0.3090.05068
Fire points0.6910.11332
Fire behavior0.164Flame length0.0380.00623
Fire line intensity0.1860.0305
Heat per unit area0.2650.04346
Fire spread0.230.03772
Ignition potential map0.2820.04625
Wind characteristics0.169Wind speed0.0490.00828
Wind effect index0.4260.07199
Wind speed mid flame0.5250.08873
Fuel characteristics0.172Fuel load0.3330.05728
Fuel type0.3360.05779
Fuel moisture0.3310.05693
Distance of barriers0.171 0.171
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Alhaj Khalaf, M.W.; Shataee-Jouibary, S.; Jahdi, R. Optimum Allocation of Firebreaks Networks during the Design Process in Golestan National Park, Northeastern Iran. Environ. Sci. Proc. 2022, 17, 41. https://doi.org/10.3390/environsciproc2022017041

AMA Style

Alhaj Khalaf MW, Shataee-Jouibary S, Jahdi R. Optimum Allocation of Firebreaks Networks during the Design Process in Golestan National Park, Northeastern Iran. Environmental Sciences Proceedings. 2022; 17(1):41. https://doi.org/10.3390/environsciproc2022017041

Chicago/Turabian Style

Alhaj Khalaf, Mhd Wathek, Shaban Shataee-Jouibary, and Roghayeh Jahdi. 2022. "Optimum Allocation of Firebreaks Networks during the Design Process in Golestan National Park, Northeastern Iran" Environmental Sciences Proceedings 17, no. 1: 41. https://doi.org/10.3390/environsciproc2022017041

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop