Next Article in Journal
How Accurate Climate Information Can Help the Climate Adaptation in Regional Scale: The Case Study of Sitia
Previous Article in Journal
The Predictability of the Synoptic-Scale Fire Weather Conditions during the 2018 Mati Wildfire
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

The Organization of Convection into Lines in Northern Greece: The Case of 18 May 2007 †

by
Anastasia Dokopoulou
1,
Kostantinos Laskos
2,
Maria Olga Voudouri
2,
Mairi Vlachou
3,* and
Dimitris Brikas
4
1
Departmentof Physics, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
2
School of Geology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
3
ELGA—Meteorological Applications Centre, Airport Makedonia, 55103 Thessaloniki, Greece
4
Regional Meteorological Center Makedonia, International Airport Makedonia, 55103 Thessaloniki, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 16th International Conference on Meteorology, Climatology and Atmospheric Physics—COMECAP 2023, Athens, Greece, 25–29 September 2023.
Environ. Sci. Proc. 2023, 26(1), 169; https://doi.org/10.3390/environsciproc2023026169
Published: 4 September 2023

Abstract

:
The synoptic–meso-α scale study of a convective line shows that the latter was favored by the vertical superposition of the passage of an ULFnt onto a low-level convergence line.

1. Introduction

Moist convection often organizes in lines in Greece, despite the highly complicated nature of the terrain. Even during the warm season of the year, when convective elements are expected to be more localized/isolated, due to daytime heating, the organization of convective cells into lines is a common feature. This makes weather modification a challenging task for the staff of the Hellenic Agricultural Insurance Organization, both for air crews and meteorologists, who work on the National Hail Suppression Program. In view of the above, the ability to forecast the organization of moist convection into lines may improve the effectiveness of its treatment, as far as weather modification is concerned. The European Center for Medium-range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF), RADAR, as well as hailpad data were collected for a set of nine (9) cases from the period 2007–2017, with the criterion of an accompanying southwesterly upper air current, which has been shown to be a factor of potential occurrence of severe convection [1]. The first of these cases occurred in the early morning hours of 18 May 2007.
Echoes appeared on the radar monitor at 04:15 UTC, a time of the day when convection is not expected to occur. Cells were initially scattered, but very soon organized in a line, which stretched along the western coast of the Thermaikos Gulf. Also, unexpectedly, the line convection strengthened as it moved northeastward, above the sea (Figure 1d), whose surface temperature is only 17 °C this time of the year. The line soon approached land, reaching a rather high intensity, with maximum reflectivities exceeding 60 dBz and producing hail. The gradual vertical destabilization of the air column may be seen in the Τ-Φgrams of Figure 1a–c.

2. Synoptic–Meso-α Scale-Associated Features

Neither the time nor the area of formation favored the initiation of moist convection in this case, whichindicates the potentially important role of the dynamics. All charts and plots are for the period 12 UTC on 17 May–06 UTC on 18 May 2007. Synoptic charts are plotted in Figure 2. At 12 UTC on 17 May (hereafter 17/12), two main frontal lows can be seen in the left column, one in southern Scandinavia, with its cold front extending down to Central Europe and another one in the Balkans, with a ratherlooser frontal structure. The accompanying upper air troughs, a southern and a northern one, merge along the northwesterly part of their flow. This creates a strong north northwesterly jet. Warm air (see 300–500 hPa relative flow directions) and anticyclonic vorticity (not shown) advection occur in the jet, whereas cold air and cyclonic vorticity advection occur ahead of its left exit, above Greece. This flow pattern is associated with the gradual build-up of the ridgeabove Western Europe and the deepening/amplification and later tendency of the trough in the Mediterranean to cut-off. The response of the mean sea level pressure (MSLP) is the gradual southeastward expansion of the cold anticyclone behind the main cold front in Europe and the slow deepening of the stationary low in Greece. At the time, the convective event under study occurred, 18/06 (last chart), the maximum pressure gradient is observed above the Balkans, with five (5) standard isobars between Central Europe and Greece and the anticyclone (low) attaining its maximum (minimum) pressure, 1022 (1002) hPa in Austria (Northern Greece). As will be seen below, this strong pressure gradient was associated with a northwesterly current, which even reached Greece pre-frontally. The deepening of the low favored the convergence of the northwesterly current with an easterly current, in the area the convection emerged.
In the right column, the main features of interest are the following. A polar air mass (min θe ~290 K) advances southeastward behind the main cold front in Europe. Further south, due to the land/mass distribution, southwesterly wind directions act to advect relatively cool air masses, so the warm sector (max θe ~330 K) of the low in Greece is actually cut-off to the north of the center of the low. From 18/00, the cool northwesterly pre-frontal flow of the main cold front has entered Greece and, at 18/06, it converges with the warm easterly flow, associated with the warm sector of the low. Equally important, at 500 hPa, a baroclinic zone surrounds the trough of cold/dry air (min θe ~210 K) in Southern Italy, at 17/12. As the trough expands westward, this upper level front (ULFnt, thick dotted black line) sweeps across Greece. Just before 18/06, the time the convection occurred, the passage of the ULFnt coincides with the convergence of the northwesterlies with the easterlies at low levels. The above correspond to a vertical column destabilization and a low-level triggering of convection, respectively.
Aiming to focus in the area of interest, low-level flow and low and upper-level θe are plotted in Figure 3. Only the low-level flow is shown in the left column, where the gradual pick up of the winds is evident around the low in the Greek area. Two are the most important wind currents. First, the initially southerly one, that gradually spirals around the low, finally (18/06) turning easterly in Central Makedonia. Second, the northerly current that advances southward, entering the chart (Greek area) at 17/18 (18/06). The two above wind currents converged at the time and place the convective line formed.
In the middle column, the thermal advection associated with each of the above air currents may be inferred, as the 850 hPa θe distribution is in the background. It is obvious that in the area the convection broke out (18/06), cold (warm) air advection from the NNW (east) were brought into close proximity. In both left and middle columns, it can be seen that the vertical superposition of dry and cold air masses (see passage of ULFnt) aided vertical destabilization.
In the third column of Figure 3, a further focus in the Central Makedonian area shows that the ULFnt is better defined in the eastern part. This is in accordance with the fact that the ECMWF actually diagnosed little or no ascent (white cross-hatching) in the region affected by the line under study (red area in last chart of the sequence). A comparison of the sounding data (Figure 1a–c) with ECMWF vertical profiles may shed light in the poorly reproduced physical processes that led to this model deviation.

3. Conclusions

The examination of ECMWF data shows that early in the morning of 18 May 2007, in Central Makedonia, the low-level confluence between a warm easterly current and a cold northwesterly one coincided with the passage of an ULFnt aloft. The low-level convergence provided the necessary trigger, lifting the convectively unstable layer that formed as cold/dry air masses which, superimposed onto the warm and humid ones, wasadvected by the low-level easterly flow. The result was the break out of convection, which organized into a line that very likely consisted of the points of the “temporal” intersection of the convergence line and the ULFnt. Although further research is required toward this direction, a general conclusion from this study is that the careful appreciation of the synoptic–meso-α features is required in order to detect the potential for moist convection, especially during the warm season, when an only-minor trigger may result in significant activity. A more specific conclusion is that the eastern–northeasterly winds are particularly favorable for moist convection, as they advect air that is heated over the adjacent land mass. Cut-off lows at relatively low latitudes favor a general backing of the wind with time, at least up to the easterly direction. Less backing would mean that the southerly component of the wind would transfer cool air masses from the Aegean Sea, which would dump the convection, whereas no backing at all would mean a significant westerly component, which is katabatic in the area of Central Makedonia.

Author Contributions

All authors contributed equally to each sector. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

www.ecmwf.int, http://resources.eumetrain.org/ePort_MapViewer/index.htm, ELGA—Meteorological Applications Centre, University of Wyoming.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Reference

  1. Greek National Hail Suppression Program, Annual Report; Hellenic Agricultural Insurance Organization (ELGA): Thessaloniki, Greece, 2007.
Figure 1. (a). Soundings from the upper air station of Thessaloniki for 12UTC 17 May 2007. Blue (red): areas of CAPE (CIN). Layers of cold air advection (CAA) are indicated. (b,c): as in a, but for 00 and 06UTC 18 May, resp. (d). RADAR data for 06UTC 18 May 2007.
Figure 1. (a). Soundings from the upper air station of Thessaloniki for 12UTC 17 May 2007. Blue (red): areas of CAPE (CIN). Layers of cold air advection (CAA) are indicated. (b,c): as in a, but for 00 and 06UTC 18 May, resp. (d). RADAR data for 06UTC 18 May 2007.
Environsciproc 26 00169 g001
Figure 2. (Left): Shading: MSLP per 4 hPa. Black contours: 500 hPa heights per 60 gpm. First contour in lower left corner of first chart is 5760 gpm. Arrows:300 hPa winds > 25 m/s. (Right): Colours: 850 hPa θe. Black isotherms: 500 hPa θe. Arrows: 850 hPa winds. Thick lines: blue (red): cold (warm) fronts, black dotted: 500 hPa θe front (ULFnt).
Figure 2. (Left): Shading: MSLP per 4 hPa. Black contours: 500 hPa heights per 60 gpm. First contour in lower left corner of first chart is 5760 gpm. Arrows:300 hPa winds > 25 m/s. (Right): Colours: 850 hPa θe. Black isotherms: 500 hPa θe. Arrows: 850 hPa winds. Thick lines: blue (red): cold (warm) fronts, black dotted: 500 hPa θe front (ULFnt).
Environsciproc 26 00169 g002
Figure 3. (Left): 850 hPa winds (speed) > 2 (8) m/s. Main wind currents are highlighted by thick black arrows. ULFnt is thick black dotted line and C (W) denote its cold (warm) side. (Middle): As in left, but for 925 hPa θe (colours). (Right): further zoom in Greek area. Isotherms: 500 hPa θe. Open frontal symbols: 500 hPa θe front. Arrows and colours: as in middle. White hatching: ω850 – 400 hPa < - 0.5 Pa/s per 0.5 Pa/s. Red line encloses area where RADAR reflectivity is significant, but ECMWF diagnoses little or no ascent.
Figure 3. (Left): 850 hPa winds (speed) > 2 (8) m/s. Main wind currents are highlighted by thick black arrows. ULFnt is thick black dotted line and C (W) denote its cold (warm) side. (Middle): As in left, but for 925 hPa θe (colours). (Right): further zoom in Greek area. Isotherms: 500 hPa θe. Open frontal symbols: 500 hPa θe front. Arrows and colours: as in middle. White hatching: ω850 – 400 hPa < - 0.5 Pa/s per 0.5 Pa/s. Red line encloses area where RADAR reflectivity is significant, but ECMWF diagnoses little or no ascent.
Environsciproc 26 00169 g003
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dokopoulou, A.; Laskos, K.; Voudouri, M.O.; Vlachou, M.; Brikas, D. The Organization of Convection into Lines in Northern Greece: The Case of 18 May 2007. Environ. Sci. Proc. 2023, 26, 169. https://doi.org/10.3390/environsciproc2023026169

AMA Style

Dokopoulou A, Laskos K, Voudouri MO, Vlachou M, Brikas D. The Organization of Convection into Lines in Northern Greece: The Case of 18 May 2007. Environmental Sciences Proceedings. 2023; 26(1):169. https://doi.org/10.3390/environsciproc2023026169

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dokopoulou, Anastasia, Kostantinos Laskos, Maria Olga Voudouri, Mairi Vlachou, and Dimitris Brikas. 2023. "The Organization of Convection into Lines in Northern Greece: The Case of 18 May 2007" Environmental Sciences Proceedings 26, no. 1: 169. https://doi.org/10.3390/environsciproc2023026169

APA Style

Dokopoulou, A., Laskos, K., Voudouri, M. O., Vlachou, M., & Brikas, D. (2023). The Organization of Convection into Lines in Northern Greece: The Case of 18 May 2007. Environmental Sciences Proceedings, 26(1), 169. https://doi.org/10.3390/environsciproc2023026169

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop