Next Article in Journal
Microclimate Changes Due to the Operation of Energy Infrastructures
Previous Article in Journal
The Influence of Meteorological Parameters on PM2.5 Concentrations on the Aegean Islands
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Source Apportionment of the Atmospheric Aerosol in Western Macedonia, GREECE, Part 1: Concentrations of Metallic Components, Major Ions, and PAHs in PM10 Samples †

by
Stylianos Gkaras
1,2,*,
Eleni Triantafyllou
1,
Anna Dougali
1,
Christos Diamantopoulos
1,
Evangelos Tolis
3 and
Athanasios Triantafyllou
1
1
Laboratory of Atmospheric Pollution and Environmental Physics (LAP-EP), Department of Mineral Resources Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Western Macedonia, 50100 Kozani, Greece
2
Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Western Macedonia, 50100 Kozani, Greece
3
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Western Macedonia, 50100 Kozani, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 16th International Conference on Meteorology, Climatology and Atmospheric Physics—COMECAP 2023, Athens, Greece, 25–29 September 2023.
Environ. Sci. Proc. 2023, 26(1), 85; https://doi.org/10.3390/environsciproc2023026085
Published: 28 August 2023

Abstract

:
The government decision to promote the change of energy mix has led to a serious decrease in industrial activities in the energy basin of Western Macedonia and subsequently had a positive influence on the air quality of the region. To examine the fact and estimate the current atmospheric emission sources, PM10 samples were collected at different sites in Western Macedonia, Greece, from February 2022 to May 2023 and were analyzed for metallic components, major ions, and PAHs. The dataset was then analyzed using PMF and CMB model to identify the possible emission sources. In this study, the first results are presented and discussed.

1. Introduction

One of the most significant pollutants aggravating air quality and impacting human health is ambient particulate matter and especially the inhalable fraction (PM10).
Generally, suspended particles are emitted from various sources (such as soil dust, marine aerosol, natural forest fires, volcanic activity, industrial emissions, transportation, wood burning, fossil fuel consumption, etc.) as a primary or secondary pollutant while they consist of organic and inorganic fraction [1]. Among their prevailing chemical constituents are associated metal(oid)s, particle-bound polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, and ionic species.
In order to identify emission sources and evaluate their contribution on ambient PM fraction, it is functional to qualify the chemical composition of atmospheric PM mass. Among the various assessment techniques, receptor modelling is a source-apportionment methodology that is widely applied to different areas affected by miscellaneous emission sources using pollutant concentration levels and meteorological data taken at receptor sites.
Up to today, a limited number of source-apportionment studies for the area of Western Macedonia have been published using receptor models. Moreover, all these studies only concern residential sites related to the lignite energy basin [2,3,4,5].
The objective of the current work is to determine the ambient PM10 concentrations levels at different sites in Western Macedonia and find out their chemical components regarding associated elements, particle-bound polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, and ionic species. In the present study, some first results of particulate matter chemical analyses are presented and described.
It must be noted that the present study represents the first part of a wider project which aims to spot dust-emission sources and explore their influence on receptors as the delignification proceeds rapidly. For this purpose, four sites were selected based on the dominant emission sources impacting the sampling sites (urban, traffic, industrial, transboundary pollution, and background pollution). Finally, the datasets of PM concentration levels and their chemical constituents presented here will be used in a second stage to assist source-apportionment studies through receptor modeling.

2. Monitoring

2.1. Study Area

Four receptor sites (Figure 1) were chosen based on the prevailing emission sources.
The first sampling site is located within the built environment in the city of Kozani (SKOZ, 40.299° Ν, 21.799° E, 711 m above sea level, 50,000 inhabitants), where urban activities take place, and anthropogenic emissions are dominant.
The second site is in Grevena city (SGRE, 40.082° N, 21.426° E, 526 m asl, 16,500 inhabitants) where biomass (wood and its derivatives) and oil consumption are the major energy sources for residential use. Urban activities and traffic also occur.
The third is in Neos Kaukasos (SNKAUK, 40.894° Ν, 21.472° E and 594 m asl), a hamlet with 230 inhabitants in a rural district, which is affected by industrial transboundary pollution. It is located 500 m away from the Greek–North Macedonian borders and about 15 km from the coal mines and lignite Power Plant (REK Bitola).
The fourth is in an area mainly covered by tree crops where farming activities (use of pesticides, ploughing etc.) generally take place. Specifically, it is located at west northwest sector of the village Velvendos and about 200 m away from the settlement (SVEL, 40.259° Ν, 22.064° E and 385 m asl, 3400 inhabitants). So, this receptor can be considered as rural.

2.2. Ambient Sampling

A one-year sampling of airborne particulate matter (PM10) was conducted at four chosen receptors in Western Macedonia, Greece, from February 2022 to May 2023. The 24 h samples of suspended particles were collected by filtration on PTFE membrane filters (teflo, Pall) using low-volume (2.3 m3 h−1) air samplers (PM162M Environment S.A. and Derenda LVS). Unloaded and loaded filters placed on open but dust-protected sieve trays, were exposed before and after sampling for 48 h to steady temperature and relative humidity (T = 22 ± 2 °C and R.H. = 43 ± 5%) in an air-conditioned weighing room. The determination of particle mass concentrations was carried out gravimetrically using an analytical microbalance, placed in the weighing room while the static electricity from the filters and tools used was eliminated by a static eliminator. Overall, 64, 90, 75 and 89 samples were selected for each site SKOZ, SGRE, SNKAUK and SVEL, respectively.

2.3. Elemental Analysis

The chosen filters (7, 31, 8 and 10 samples for SKOZ, SGRE, SNKAUK and SVEL, respectively) regarding the period from February to August 2022 were digested by an Anton Paar Multiwave GO Plus microwave digestion system (Method 3051A) using 6 mL mixed acid (3:1 high purity HNO3 and HCl). The extracts were filtered through syringe filter (PTFE, 0.45 μm pore size) and diluted to 25 mL with high-purity water. Eventually, the final aqueous solutions were analyzed by ICP-MS (Agilent 7500) for the determination of Be, Na, Mg, Al, K, Ca, V, Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Cu, As, Se, Mo, Ag, Cd, Sb, Ba, Pb, Th and U. The elemental concentrations were corrected using blank samples and taking into account the recovery rates for each chemical component.

2.4. Extraction and PAH Analysis

The representative number of samples was analyzed to determine the PM10-bound PAHs. The organic fraction was obtained from the filters using the two-stage extraction method. Initially, PTFE membrane filters were extracted via refluxing with 5 mL hexane for 30 min. The second stage was carried out using an ultrasonic extraction technique by 5 mL hexane–acetone mixture (1/1) for 15 min. The two-stage extracts obtained were transferred in 10 mL vials and were finally concentrated up to 0.1 mL under the gentle pure-nitrogen gas flow.
The final extracts were analyzed for PAHs by Agilent Technologies 6890 N gas chromatograph coupled to a 5973-mass selective detector (GC-MSD) operated in the selected ion-monitoring mode (SIM).

2.5. Extraction and Analysis of Ionic Species

The third quarter of the filter was treated in an ultrasonic bath for 30 min with 10 mL of ultra-pure water (Millipore Direct Q, resistivity 18.2 MΩ). The extracts after filtration through 0.45 μm Nylon syringe filters were injected to a Metrohom 850 Professional, chromatographic system. The ion chromatography injection volume was 20 μL, the run time was 30 min, and the column temperature was kept to 30 °C. Field and laboratory blanks were routinely analyzed for ionic species and the results were subtracted from the sample values.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. PM10 Concentrations

The measurement campaign was conducted throughout a year at four receptor sites SKOZ (April 2022 to May 2023, n = 64), SGRE (February 2022 to May 2023, n = 90), SNKAUK (Jun 2022–May 2023, n = 75) and SVEL (April 2022 to May 2023, n = 89), and the PM10 concentrations were determined gravimetrically. The mean annual concentrations of PM10 during the sampling period at the four receptors are presented in Table 1. As seen, the average concentrations of PM10 in all cases were below the EU-proposed annual limit value of 40 μg m−3 (83/399/ECC) [6].
The highest PM10 values were recorded at Kozani and Grevena, where urban activities take place, and anthropogenic emissions are generally dominant. The mean values of PM10 levels were 18 and 25 μg m−3, and the daily concentrations were ranging from 5 to 64 and 5 to 57 μg m−3, respectively.
In accordance with the directive 2008/50/EC [7], the 24 h limit value of 50 μg m−3 for PM10 has been exceeded once (1.6%) in the case of Kozani and three times (3.3%) at the measuring station of Grevena. However, no value recorded on a 24 h basis exceeded the daily limit at the SNKAUK and SVEL stations.

3.2. Elemental Concentrations

Restricted number of ambient PM10 samples regarding the period from February to August 2022, after collection and weighing, underwent a chemical analysis to determine the associated metals and metalloids at the receptors. Specifically, 7, 31, 8 and 10 filters were chosen and analyzed from SKOZ, SGRE, SNKAUK and SVEL, respectively. For the selection of sampling filters, the prevailing meteorological conditions, and the PM10 concentration levels were taken into account.
The first results of PM10 chemical analyses are shown in Table 2 where the elemental composition of particle matter at the sampling sites is summarized. Through examining these records, a wealth of information is drawn regarding specific properties and characteristics of collected aerosols such as their origin, toxicity, etc.
More specifically, the total mass of the chemical species determined as a percentage of the PM10 mass was 12.96, 8.75, 8.86 and 9.61% for SKOZ, SGRE, SNKAUK and SVEL receptor sites, respectively. As it seems, the crustal elements (Al, Ca, Mg, and Fe) were the most abundant components contributing to PM10 mass, indicating that the earth surface constitutes a significant emission source.
At all sites, mean Pb values were well below the ambient air quality standard of 500 ng m−3 (as annual mean, EC, 1999) [6]. Moreover, as it turns out, the mean concentrations of As and Cd were also lower than the proposed assessment thresholds (6 and 5 ng m−3, respectively, EC, 2003). In the case of V, the proposed 24 h concentration is 1 μg m3, a value never exceeded during the sampling campaign (WHO, 2000) [8]. Finally, the mean total concentration of Mn was found lower than the annual tolerance concentration included in the WHO Air Quality Guidelines (150 ng m−3, WHO, 2000) [8].
The above-mentioned results and observations constitute a small part of data to draw safe conclusions through receptor modeling.
So, with a view to estimate the contribution of PM emission sources on atmospheric PM mass and investigate this problem in depth, it is of great importance to gather as many data as possible regarding the chemical composition of PM10 samples.
Bearing that in mind, it is considered necessary to continue the chemical analyses of collected ambient dust samples.

4. Conclusions

  • The PM10 measurement campaign was conducted throughout a one-year period at three receptor sites with different features in Western Macedonia, a region in NW Greece with mining and lignite power activities.
  • The mean PM10 values from all the sampling sites were below the annual limit value of 40 μg m−3.
  • The 24 h limit value of 50 μg m−3 for PM10 has been exceeded once (1.6%) in the case of Kozani and three times (3.3%) at the measuring station of Grevena. No value recorded on a 24 h basis exceeded the daily limit at the New Kaukasos and Velvento stations.
  • Crustal matter (such as oxides of Al, Ca, Mg, and Fe) made up the main components of PM10.
  • At all receptor sites, the mean values of Pb, V, As, and Cd were lower than the proposed assessment thresholds.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.G. and A.T.; methodology, S.G.; validation, S.G. and A.T.; formal analysis, S.G., E.T. (Eleni Triantafyllou) and A.D.; investigation, S.G. and E.T. (Eleni Triantafyllou); data curation, S.G. and A.D.; field measurements: S.G. and C.D.; chemical analysis, S.G., E.T. (Evangelos Tolis) and A.D.; writing—original draft preparation, S.G. and E.T. (Eleni Triantafyllou); writing—review and editing, S.G., A.D. and A.T.; supervision, A.T.; project administration, A.T.; All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research has been funded by the Operational Program “Competitiveness, Entrepreneurship and Innovation” (NSRF 2014–2020) and co-financed by Greece and the European Union (European Regional Development Fund).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge support of this work by the project “Development of New Innovative Low-Carbon Energy Technologies to Enhance Excellence in the Region of Western Macedonia” (MIS 5047197), which is implemented under the Action “Reinforcement of the Research and Innovation Infrastructure”, funded by the Operational Program “Competitiveness, Entrepreneurship and Innovation” (NSRF 2014–2020) and co-financed by Greece and the European Union (European Regional Development Fund).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Diapouli, E.; Manousakas, M.; Vratolis, S.; Vasilatou, V.; Maggos, T.; Saraga, D.; Grigoratos, T.; Argyropoulos, G.; Voutsa, D.; Samara, C.; et al. Evolution of air pollution source contributions over one decade, derived by PM10 and PM2.5 source apportionment in two metropolitan urban areas in Greece. Atmos. Environ. 2017, 164, 416–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Samara, C. Chemical mass balance source apportionment of TSP in a lignite-burning area of Western Macedonia, Greece. Atmos. Environ. 2005, 39, 6430–6443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Samara, C.; Argyropoulos, G.; Grigoratos, T.; Kouras, A.; Manoli, E.; Andreadou, S.; Pavloudakis, F.; Sahanidis, C. Chemical characterization and receptor modeling of PM10 in the surroundings of the opencast lignite mines of Western Macedonia, Greece. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2018, 25, 12206–12221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Tolis, E.I.; Saraga, D.E.; Ammari, G.A.; Gougoulas, T.; Papaioannou, C.C.; Sarioglou, A.K.; Kougioumtzidis, E.; Sfetsos, A.; Bartzis, J.G. Chemical characterization of particulate matter (PM) and source apportionment study during winter and summer period for the city of Kozani, Greece. Cent. Eur. J. Chem. 2014, 12, 643–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Garas, S.K.; Triantafyllou, A.G.; Tolis, E.I.; Diamantopoulos, C.N.; Bartzis, J.G. Positive matrix factorization on elemental concentrations of PM10 samples collected in areas within, proximal and far from mining and power station operations in Greece. Glob. NEST J. 2020, 22, 132–142. [Google Scholar]
  6. EC. Council Directive 83/399/ECC Relating to Limit Values for Sulphur Dioxide and Oxides of Nitrogen, Particulate Matter, and Lead in Ambient Air; Official Journal of European Communications L 163/99; European Communities: Luxembourg, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  7. EU Directive 2008/50/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 May 2008 on Ambient Air Quality and Cleaner Air for Europe; Official Journal of European Communication L152/1. European Parliament, Council of the European Union: Strasbourg, France, 2008.
  8. WHO. Air Quality Guidelines for Europe; WHO Reginal Publications EurSer No 91; Regional Office for Europe: Copenhagen, Denmark, 2000. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. (a) Study area—NW Greece. (b) Map showing the receptor sites (S). The lignite power stations (PS, only two of these are in operation, AGD—Greece and REK Bitola—North Macedonia) and the opencast lignite mines in Western Macedonia, Greece, are also shown.
Figure 1. (a) Study area—NW Greece. (b) Map showing the receptor sites (S). The lignite power stations (PS, only two of these are in operation, AGD—Greece and REK Bitola—North Macedonia) and the opencast lignite mines in Western Macedonia, Greece, are also shown.
Environsciproc 26 00085 g001
Table 1. Statistical data of PM10 concentration level analysis.
Table 1. Statistical data of PM10 concentration level analysis.
Receptors nSampling PeriodAverage [μg m3] (min–max)Exceedances No (%)
SKOZ64April 22–May 2318 (5–64)1 (1.6%)
SGRE90February 22–May 2325 (5–57)3 (3.3%)
SNKAUK75June 22–May 2317 (4–45)-
SVEL89April 22–May 2314 (4–36)-
Table 2. Particle mass and associated elemental components—first results of chemical analysis.
Table 2. Particle mass and associated elemental components—first results of chemical analysis.
SKOZ (n = 7)SGRE (n = 31)SNKAUK (n = 8)SVEL (n = 10)
AverageSDAverageSDAverageSDAverageSD
PM10μg m32272912184197
Beng m30.030.020.020.030.020.010.020.01
Nang m38911314220111582111122
Mgng m32151372112231264913379
Alng m320317317823618182147145
Kng m318416049639417294213117
Cang m31556587998787519423859547
V ng m31.40.91.21.21.20.40.90.4
Crng m32.91.53.41.61.50.73.11.4
Mnng m312910910485
Fe ng m3579404477495433169340211
Co ng m30.30.20.330.250.30.20.190.10
Cu ng m352543532
As ng m30.60.40.400.200.70.40.30.2
Seng m30.50.20.420.170.40.10.50.2
Mo ng m30.090.080.040.040.070.090.10.3
Agng m30.040.030.040.050.020.020.10.2
Cd ng m30.20.10.240.200.20.20.10.1
Sbng m30.40.10.310.150.20.20.20.1
Ba ng m353553256
Pb ng m34916393272715
Th ng m30.110.080.080.110.110.060.070.04
U ng m30.020.010.010.020.010.010.020.01
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gkaras, S.; Triantafyllou, E.; Dougali, A.; Diamantopoulos, C.; Tolis, E.; Triantafyllou, A. Source Apportionment of the Atmospheric Aerosol in Western Macedonia, GREECE, Part 1: Concentrations of Metallic Components, Major Ions, and PAHs in PM10 Samples. Environ. Sci. Proc. 2023, 26, 85. https://doi.org/10.3390/environsciproc2023026085

AMA Style

Gkaras S, Triantafyllou E, Dougali A, Diamantopoulos C, Tolis E, Triantafyllou A. Source Apportionment of the Atmospheric Aerosol in Western Macedonia, GREECE, Part 1: Concentrations of Metallic Components, Major Ions, and PAHs in PM10 Samples. Environmental Sciences Proceedings. 2023; 26(1):85. https://doi.org/10.3390/environsciproc2023026085

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gkaras, Stylianos, Eleni Triantafyllou, Anna Dougali, Christos Diamantopoulos, Evangelos Tolis, and Athanasios Triantafyllou. 2023. "Source Apportionment of the Atmospheric Aerosol in Western Macedonia, GREECE, Part 1: Concentrations of Metallic Components, Major Ions, and PAHs in PM10 Samples" Environmental Sciences Proceedings 26, no. 1: 85. https://doi.org/10.3390/environsciproc2023026085

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop