Next Article in Journal
Smoke Generation Parameters from the Cone Calorimeter Method and Single-Chamber Test
Previous Article in Journal
ArcheoBot Experimental Tools for Archaeology and Cultural Heritage
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Experimental and Numerical Analysis of Regenerative Indirect Evaporative Coolers †

by
Francisco Comino
1,*,
María Jesús Romero-Lara
2 and
Manuel Ruiz de Adana
2
1
Departamento de Mecánica, Escuela Politécnica Superior, Campus de Rabanales, Universidad de Córdoba, Antigua Carretera Nacional IV, km 396, 14071 Córdoba, Spain
2
Departamento de Química-Física y Termodinámica Aplicada, Escuela Politécnica Superior, Campus de Rabanales, Universidad de Córdoba, Antigua Carretera Nacional IV, km 396, 14071 Córdoba, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the Innovations-Sustainability-Modernity-Openness Conference (ISMO’21), Bialystok, Poland, 14 May 2021.
Environ. Sci. Proc. 2021, 9(1), 21; https://doi.org/10.3390/environsciproc2021009021
Published: 29 October 2021
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of Innovations-Sustainability-Modernity-Openness Conference (ISMO’21))

Abstract

:
Regenerative indirect evaporative cooling (RIEC) systems are an interesting alternative to conventional air-cooling systems. In the present work, the main objective was to experimentally determine the performance of a RIEC air-cooling system under different inlet air conditions. Moreover, a mathematical RIEC model based on a modified ε-NTU numerical method was developed and validated. The experimental RIEC results showed a high cooling capacity, with dew point effectiveness values up to 0.91. The accuracy obtained of the mathematical model was more than acceptable. Therefore, it can be used properly to study the global behavior of a RIEC.

1. Introduction

Development of very low energy consumption heating, ventilation and air conditioning HVAC systems are required in the European frame of nearly zero energy building (NZEB). Evaporative cooling systems could be an effective alternative to conventional technologies, due to their high efficiency and reduced primary energy consumption [1]. There are two main types of evaporative coolers: the direct evaporative cooler (DEC), and the indirect evaporative cooler (IEC) [2,3].
Different experimental and numerical research works have been carried out in order to study the operational parameters that influence the overall performance of regenerative indirect evaporative coolers (RIEC) [4]. Experimental results established that RIEC systems could achieve high COP values [5,6,7]. Other experimental studies of RIEC showed high cooling capacities [8,9].
The main objective of this study was to experimentally determine the performance of a RIEC air-cooling system under different inlet air conditions. Moreover, a mathematical RIEC model based on a modified ε-NTU numerical method was developed and validated.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental Test Rig

An experimental test rig was built to study the performance of a regenerative indirect evaporative cooler (RIEC) under different working conditions. A schematic representation of the experimental setup is shown in Figure 1. The inlet temperature, relative humidity and air flow rate of process stream were set using cooling and heating coils (CC, HC), a steam humidifier (SH) and a variable speed fan (F), located upstream of the RIEC. The data of temperature, humidity and air flow rate were measured and recorded for each experimental test. The sensor locations are shown in Figure 1.
The RIEC system consists of a counter-flow heat and mass exchanger, a water distributing system and an outer casing. The primary air of the device, Tin, is cooled along the dry channels without moisture increase and subsequently discharged (supply air), Tout. Through the perforations located at the end of channels, a portion of the primary air is diverted into the adjacent wet channels. Flowing in counter direction to the primary air in dry channels, the secondary air of wet channels is humidified, heated and finally exhausted to outside. A damper was used to regulate the discharge air pressure and control the supply air flow.
A total of 25 experimental tests of the RIEC system were performed for the study and validation of the mathematical RIEC model. The ranges of the experimental test carried out are shown in Table 1. The input variables were the inlet air primary temperature, Tin, inlet air primary humidity ratio, in, primary air flow rate, Vin, and ratio of secondary air flow rate to primary air flow rate, R. Each state point was taken under steady-state conditions and all the measured values were average values over a period of 20 min with sampling time steps of 5 s.

2.2. Mathematical Model of the Indirect Evaporative Cooler

A mathematical RIEC model based on modified ε-NTU numerical method to determine the optimal geometrical and operating parameters was developed. The main equations of the model are expressed by (1)–(3).
N T U = U * d A / C m i n , i
U * d A = ( a · [ 1 α d , i + δ K + δ w K w ] + 1 β i ) 1 · N c h · W · d x
ε = f ( N T U , C r , i )

2.3. Validation and Evaluation of the Indirect Evaporative Cooler

The validation of the mathematical model and the performance study of the RIEC were carried out in terms of variations in primary air temperature, T, and of dew point effectiveness, dp. Such indexes were defined through the following equations:
Δ T = T i n T o u t
ε d p = T i n T o u t T i n T d p , o u t
where T is dry bulb temperature and Tdp is dew point temperature.

3. Results and Discussion

The experimental and numerical results of variation of primary air temperature, T, and of dew point effectiveness, dp, are shown in Figure 2, corresponding to the 25 tests that were carried out. As shown in Figure 2, there is a very good agreement between numerical and experimental primary air temperature variations, being that the deviation was always within 0.45 °C (see Figure 2a). The accuracy of the dew point effectiveness results was also been found to be appropriate, with deviations of less than 0.025 (see Figure 2b).
The experimental results showed high T values, up to 26.5 °C for values of Tin, in, Vin and R equal to 43 °C, 8.5 g/kg, 4000 m3/h and 0.5, respectively, see Figure 2a. The dp results showed that the supply air conditions were close to the dew point. The highest dp value was 0.91 for values of Tin, in, Vin and R equal to 43 °C, 13 g/kg, 3000 m3/h and 0.35, respectively (see Figure 2b).
The validated model allowed to obtain the temperature, enthalpy and humidity distributions inside the exchanger. The air conditions of the primary and secondary air flows for each computational element of the exchanger are shown in Figure 3. For this example, 100 computational elements were used for the numerical modelling.

4. Conclusions

The experimental results showed that the studied RIEC system reached high cooling capacity. Therefore, the device can be considered as a serious alternative to conventional air-cooling systems composed of direct expansion units. The numerical results suggested that the proposed mathematical model can be valid to study the air-cooling system in detail, achieving suitable accuracy. The maximum deviations of T and dp were always within 0.45 °C and 0.025, respectively. Moreover, the model allowed to obtain the temperature, enthalpy and humidity distributions inside the exchanger.

Author Contributions

F.C. conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, and wrote the paper; M.J.R.-L. performed the experiments; M.R.d.A. contributed to the development of the numerical model and analyzed the data. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the financial support received by the European Regional Development Fund and the Andalusian Economy, Knowledge, Enterprise and University Council, Spain, through the research project HICOOL, reference 1263034, and the Postdoctoral Fellowship of the University of Cordoba, Spain, and by European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme, through the research project WEDISTRICT, reference H2020-WIDESPREAD2018-03-857801.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Porumb, B.; Ungureşan, P.; Tutunaru, L.F.; Şerban, A.; BǍlan, M. A Review of Indirect Evaporative Cooling Operating Conditions and Performances. Energy Procedia 2016, 85, 452–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Porumb, B.; Ungureşan, P.; Tutunaru, L.F.; Şerban, A.; BǍlan, M. A Review of Indirect Evaporative Cooling Technology. Energy Procedia 2016, 85, 461–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Pandelidis, D.; Anisimov, S.; Drag, P. Performance comparison between selected evaporative air coolers. Energies 2017, 10, 577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Wang, Y.; Huang, X.; Li, L. Comparative study of the cross-flow heat and mass exchangers for indirect evaporative cooling using numerical methods. Energies 2018, 11, 3374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Pandelidis, D.; Anisimov, S. Application of a statistical design for analyzing basic performance characteristics of the cross-flow Maisotsenko cycle heat exchanger. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 2016, 95, 45–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Duan, Z.; Zhao, X.; Li, J. Design, fabrication and performance evaluation of a compact regenerative evaporative cooler: Towards low energy cooling for buildings. Energy 2017, 140, 506–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Lin, J.; Wang, R.; Li, C.; Wang, S.; Long, J.; Chua, K.J. Towards a thermodynamically favorable dew point evaporative cooler via optimization. Energy Convers. Manag. 2020, 203, 112224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lin, J.; Bui, D.T.; Wang, R.; Chua, K.J. The counter-flow dew point evaporative cooler: Analyzing its transient and steady-state behavior. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2018, 143, 34–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ali, M.; Ahmad, W.; Sheikh, N.A.; Ali, H.; Kousar, R.; ur Rashid, T. Performance enhancement of a cross flow dew point indirect evaporative cooler with circular finned channel geometry. J. Build. Eng. 2020, 101980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Layout of the test facility of the regenerative indirect evaporative cooler.
Figure 1. Layout of the test facility of the regenerative indirect evaporative cooler.
Environsciproc 09 00021 g001
Figure 2. Parity plots of experimental and numerical results of (a) primary air temperature variations, ΔT, and (b) dew point effectiveness, εdp.
Figure 2. Parity plots of experimental and numerical results of (a) primary air temperature variations, ΔT, and (b) dew point effectiveness, εdp.
Environsciproc 09 00021 g002
Figure 3. Psychrometric chart with the primary and secondary air flows for each computational element.
Figure 3. Psychrometric chart with the primary and secondary air flows for each computational element.
Environsciproc 09 00021 g003
Table 1. Ranges of the experimental tests carried out.
Table 1. Ranges of the experimental tests carried out.
RangeTin [°C]in [g/kg]Vin [m3/h]R [-]
Lower value338.530000.3
Upper value431345000.7
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Comino, F.; Romero-Lara, M.J.; Adana, M.R.d. Experimental and Numerical Analysis of Regenerative Indirect Evaporative Coolers. Environ. Sci. Proc. 2021, 9, 21. https://doi.org/10.3390/environsciproc2021009021

AMA Style

Comino F, Romero-Lara MJ, Adana MRd. Experimental and Numerical Analysis of Regenerative Indirect Evaporative Coolers. Environmental Sciences Proceedings. 2021; 9(1):21. https://doi.org/10.3390/environsciproc2021009021

Chicago/Turabian Style

Comino, Francisco, María Jesús Romero-Lara, and Manuel Ruiz de Adana. 2021. "Experimental and Numerical Analysis of Regenerative Indirect Evaporative Coolers" Environmental Sciences Proceedings 9, no. 1: 21. https://doi.org/10.3390/environsciproc2021009021

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop