Next Article in Journal
Propaganda and Manipulation in Mexico: A Programmed, Coordinated and Manipulative “Pink” Campaign
Previous Article in Journal
New Routines in Making the Local News: How Fear and Distancing Change the Coverage of Violence in Brazil
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Correction

Correction: Meier et al. (2022). Examining the Most Relevant Journalism Innovations: A Comparative Analysis of Five European Countries from 2010 to 2020. Journalism and Media 3: 698–714

by
Klaus Meier
1,*,
Jonas Schützeneder
2,
José Alberto García Avilés
3,
José María Valero-Pastor
3,
Andy Kaltenbrunner
4,5,
Renée Lugschitz
4,5,
Colin Porlezza
6,
Giulia Ferri
6,
Vinzenz Wyss
7 and
Mirco Saner
7
1
School of Journalism, Catholic University Eichstaett-Ingolstadt, 80572 Eichstaett, Germany
2
Institute of Journalism, Hochschule Magdeburg-Stendal, 39114 Magdeburg, Germany
3
Department of Social Sciences, Miguel Hernández University, 03202 Elche, Spain
4
Medienhaus Wien, 1160 Wien, Austria
5
CMC-Institute, Austrian Academy of Sciences/University of Klagenfurt, 1010 Wien, Austria
6
Institute of Media and Journalism, Università della Svizzera Italiana, 6900 Lugano, Switzerland
7
IAM Institute of Applied Media Studies, ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences, 8400 Winterthur, Switzerland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Journal. Media 2023, 4(2), 576-577; https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia4020036
Submission received: 21 March 2023 / Accepted: 21 March 2023 / Published: 28 April 2023

Error in Table 6

In the original publication Meier et al. 2022, we made a mistake in Table 6, where we slipped in the columns during layout and therefore transmitted errors in the values. Below, we present the corrected table. These mistakes do not affect the data and results presented in the text, or the article’s conclusions (Meier et al. 2022).
Table 6. Total Innovations selected in the five markets.
Table 6. Total Innovations selected in the five markets.
Name of InnovationAustria
Position
Germany PositionSpain
Position
Switzerland
Position
UK
Position
Data journalism35141
Collaborative/Investigative1115113
Engagement (data)1621293
Social media1134820
Diversity41015149
Paywalls/Paid content41281613
Automation111612710
New organizational teams101215319
Storytelling6262
Citizen participation11328
Mobile journalism215511
Audio/Podcast68716
Remote work178147
Fact-checking1035
Membership models8616
Newsletter14818
Media labs161516
Crowdfunding201719
Journalism start-ups71
Local journalism105
Constructive journalism712
Foundation funding1214
Para-journalism1111
Science journalism1215
Niche media1914
Other financing models1916
Targeting 5
Quality management11
Tools discourse quality8
Personal/Digital meetings9
News only TV channel14
Video by print media16
Corporate culture19
Entrepreneurial journalism19
Branded content20
Source: Authors’ own research.

Reference

  1. Meier, Klaus, Jonas Schützeneder, José Alberto García Avilés, José María Valero-Pastor, Andy Kaltenbrunner, Renée Lugschitz, Colin Porlezza, Giulia Ferri, Vinzenz Wyss, and Mirco Saner. 2022. Examining the Most Relevant Journalism Innovations: A Comparative Analysis of Five European Countries from 2010 to 2020. Journalism and Media 3: 698–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Meier, K.; Schützeneder, J.; García Avilés, J.A.; Valero-Pastor, J.M.; Kaltenbrunner, A.; Lugschitz, R.; Porlezza, C.; Ferri, G.; Wyss, V.; Saner, M. Correction: Meier et al. (2022). Examining the Most Relevant Journalism Innovations: A Comparative Analysis of Five European Countries from 2010 to 2020. Journalism and Media 3: 698–714. Journal. Media 2023, 4, 576-577. https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia4020036

AMA Style

Meier K, Schützeneder J, García Avilés JA, Valero-Pastor JM, Kaltenbrunner A, Lugschitz R, Porlezza C, Ferri G, Wyss V, Saner M. Correction: Meier et al. (2022). Examining the Most Relevant Journalism Innovations: A Comparative Analysis of Five European Countries from 2010 to 2020. Journalism and Media 3: 698–714. Journalism and Media. 2023; 4(2):576-577. https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia4020036

Chicago/Turabian Style

Meier, Klaus, Jonas Schützeneder, José Alberto García Avilés, José María Valero-Pastor, Andy Kaltenbrunner, Renée Lugschitz, Colin Porlezza, Giulia Ferri, Vinzenz Wyss, and Mirco Saner. 2023. "Correction: Meier et al. (2022). Examining the Most Relevant Journalism Innovations: A Comparative Analysis of Five European Countries from 2010 to 2020. Journalism and Media 3: 698–714" Journalism and Media 4, no. 2: 576-577. https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia4020036

APA Style

Meier, K., Schützeneder, J., García Avilés, J. A., Valero-Pastor, J. M., Kaltenbrunner, A., Lugschitz, R., Porlezza, C., Ferri, G., Wyss, V., & Saner, M. (2023). Correction: Meier et al. (2022). Examining the Most Relevant Journalism Innovations: A Comparative Analysis of Five European Countries from 2010 to 2020. Journalism and Media 3: 698–714. Journalism and Media, 4(2), 576-577. https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia4020036

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop