Journal Description
Journalism and Media
Journalism and Media
is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal on journalism and the media, published quarterly online by MDPI.
- Open Access— free for readers, with article processing charges (APC) paid by authors or their institutions.
- High Visibility: indexed within ESCI (Web of Science), Scopus and other databases.
- Rapid Publication: manuscripts are peer-reviewed and a first decision is provided to authors approximately 31.1 days after submission; acceptance to publication is undertaken in 5.5 days (median values for papers published in this journal in the second half of 2024).
- Journal Rank: JCR - Q2 (Communication) / CiteScore - Q1 (Linguistics and Language)
- Recognition of Reviewers: APC discount vouchers, optional signed peer review, and reviewer names are published annually in the journal.
Impact Factor:
2.0 (2023);
5-Year Impact Factor:
2.1 (2023)
Latest Articles
“Women Will Never Be Equal to Men”: Examining Women Journalists’ Experiences of Patriarchy and Sexism in South Africa
Journal. Media 2025, 6(1), 27; https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia6010027 (registering DOI) - 15 Feb 2025
Abstract
Research shows that gender transformation policies and programmes within the media industry have done little to curtail sexism and patriarchal values in news reporting. This study’s term ‘patriarchy’ refers to the systemic structures of masculine dominance entrenched in societal, cultural, and institutional norms.
[...] Read more.
Research shows that gender transformation policies and programmes within the media industry have done little to curtail sexism and patriarchal values in news reporting. This study’s term ‘patriarchy’ refers to the systemic structures of masculine dominance entrenched in societal, cultural, and institutional norms. This systemic understanding is complemented by exploring individual acts that perpetuate sexism, understood as both explicit and implicit forms of discrimination based on gender. Within newsrooms, where considerable studies have been conducted, data show alarming evidence of extensive sexism and patriarchal values, which are often nuanced and embedded into daily operations. Significantly, the current body of research argues that the problems experienced within the newsroom manifest a societal issue. However, there is a need for more research that turns the spotlight specifically on how newsmakers interact with women reporters in the field. This paper investigates how sexism and gender-based power imbalances affect female journalists’ professional experiences and roles in South Africa. The paper uses qualitative methods to explore how gender inequality and male dominance influence female journalists’ roles, opportunities, and treatment within the profession. This paper contributes to the current discourse by arguing that deeply ingrained societal and cultural patriarchal norms significantly shape and restrict the professional lives of women reporters. Data were collected using semi-structured interviews with eleven (n = 11) reporters drawn from various SABC radio reporters across the nine provinces in South Africa. The study’s findings detailed multiple layers of discrimination and harassment experienced by reporters when engaging with newsmakers. Evidenced in the research is how entrenched societal and cultural values limit and influence the productivity of the reporters and impede their freedom to tell stories effectively. Besides the documented glass ceilings that stunt the upward progression of female reporters, the study posits the existence of invisible walls that hinder their transversal advancement within their designated scope of reporting.
Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Mediating Sexual Violence in the #MeToo Era)
Open AccessArticle
Public Figures and Social Media from a Freedom of Expression Viewpoint in the Recent U.S. and EU Jurisdiction
by
Gergely Gosztonyi, János Bálint and Gergely Ferenc Lendvai
Journal. Media 2025, 6(1), 26; https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia6010026 - 12 Feb 2025
Abstract
Social media has transformed political communication’s landscape, reshaping how politicians engage with the public and express their views. The tension between freedom of expression and the need for responsible governance and politicians became more visible. This article examines the nuances of politicians’ freedom
[...] Read more.
Social media has transformed political communication’s landscape, reshaping how politicians engage with the public and express their views. The tension between freedom of expression and the need for responsible governance and politicians became more visible. This article examines the nuances of politicians’ freedom of expression on social media, emphasizing the importance of the right to receive information and participate in public debate. Furthermore, it explores the idea of social media profiles as public forums, examines the level of protection afforded to public officials in public discourse, and compares the content moderation frameworks in the United States and the European Union.
Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Challenges for the European Union from the Perspective of Journalism, Political Communication and Digital Platforms)
Open AccessArticle
Against-Hegemonic Agenda: Indigenous New Media and the Challenge to Hegemonic Power
by
Carlos del Valle-Rojas
Journal. Media 2025, 6(1), 25; https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia6010025 - 12 Feb 2025
Abstract
►▼
Show Figures
The main objective of this work is to identify the different strategies used by the Mapuche indigenous social movement, especially from the mid-1990s to the present day, to publicize their demands and claims. The study considered three methodological strategies, namely, the analysis of
[...] Read more.
The main objective of this work is to identify the different strategies used by the Mapuche indigenous social movement, especially from the mid-1990s to the present day, to publicize their demands and claims. The study considered three methodological strategies, namely, the analysis of a corpus of news, the making of individual and group interviews, and the documentation of a review and analysis. Among the main findings is the identification of two strategies. The first aimed to intervene in the agenda of the hegemonic media in Chile and the second aimed to create their own media as an alternative media agenda. The central concern of the research is to understand how the Mapuche movement, through the use of certain media strategies, manages to break through the hegemonic agenda in Chile towards an against-agenda that allows them to make their demands and claims visible. Thus, the problem also consists of knowing what the strategies most used by the Mapuche movement are. Is it possible to establish an against-agenda? And what are the characteristics of the latter? Finally, the paper argues for the dependence of the against-agenda on the underlying socio-political conditions. This work will allow us to analyze other experiences of indigenous or non-indigenous social movements that often use the media in different ways, especially through the intervention of hegemonic agendas and the use of alternative media.
Full article
![](https://pub.mdpi-res.com/journalmedia/journalmedia-06-00025/article_deploy/html/images/journalmedia-06-00025-g001-550.jpg?1739344868)
Figure 1
Open AccessArticle
The Visual Sociography of Disaster Journalism: A Local Case Study
by
Giacomo Buoncompagni
Journal. Media 2025, 6(1), 24; https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia6010024 - 11 Feb 2025
Abstract
►▼
Show Figures
Recent national and international emergencies have repeatedly highlighted the role of information, and local information in particular, in synthesising various social and cultural policies proposed by public authorities and providing a correct representation of the living conditions of citizens on the ground, overcoming
[...] Read more.
Recent national and international emergencies have repeatedly highlighted the role of information, and local information in particular, in synthesising various social and cultural policies proposed by public authorities and providing a correct representation of the living conditions of citizens on the ground, overcoming national media logics that are often based on the speed and spectacularisation of disasters. In fact, citizens have an “innate need” to know what is happening beyond their direct experience, to be aware of events that affect them or that are not happening in front of their eyes. A sociographic approach can be a supportive methodology to remember victims and report on disasters, but also to reconstruct new narratives by socially anticipating future environmental emergencies with the support of the media. Sociography as social narrative weaves together scientific analysis and journalistic storytelling, an old qualitative method that needs to be rediscovered, updated and integrated with new tools and methods. In this study, disaster narratives and analyses are supported by visual journalistic sources. In part, it takes up the gauntlet that Bruno Latour throws down to sociologists in Down to Earth, arguing that the latter should shift the focus of inquiry from theoretical analyses of social problems to descriptions of the existence of problems in experimental contexts, local shared spaces and common practices. This paper considers the description of (and within) the journalistic field as a methodological problem, examines the strengths and limitations of existing descriptive approaches and develops a different way of using a sociographic imagination in an attempt to make sense of changing journalistic practices with reference to specific Italian crisis events.
Full article
![](https://pub.mdpi-res.com/journalmedia/journalmedia-06-00024/article_deploy/html/images/journalmedia-06-00024-g001-550.jpg?1739239895)
Figure 1
Open AccessArticle
The Politics of Ethics: Can Honesty Cross Over Political Polarization?
by
Sang Lee and Samar Ben Romdhane
Journal. Media 2025, 6(1), 23; https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia6010023 - 9 Feb 2025
Abstract
►▼
Show Figures
This research demonstrates how confirmation and disconfirmation biases manifest based on individuals’ political affiliations when processing a self-disclosure message in the context of a political crisis. An experiment presented a crisis message in which a politician voluntarily revealed his campaign finance violations. The
[...] Read more.
This research demonstrates how confirmation and disconfirmation biases manifest based on individuals’ political affiliations when processing a self-disclosure message in the context of a political crisis. An experiment presented a crisis message in which a politician voluntarily revealed his campaign finance violations. The results revealed that confirmation bias and disconfirmation bias significantly influenced the information processing of participants based on their political affiliations. Democrat participants were significantly more open to and forgiving of the crisis message when it featured a Democrat politician. In contrast, Republican participants showed a strong tendency to be more critical and less forgiving under the same conditions. However, this pattern reversed when a Republican politician was shown in the crisis message. The research also tested moderated mediation hypotheses: the interaction effects between study participants’ political affiliations and politicians’ parties were mediated by perceived attitude toward the politician and crisis responsibility, leading to ethical perceptions about the politician. The study contributes to our understanding of the mechanisms underlying political polarization and the ways in which the biases of confirmation and disconfirmation influence individuals’ processing of political messages.
Full article
![](https://pub.mdpi-res.com/journalmedia/journalmedia-06-00023/article_deploy/html/images/journalmedia-06-00023-g001-550.jpg?1739320863)
Figure 1
Open AccessArticle
The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Romanian Broadcasting: Opportunities and Challenges
by
Ștefan Vlăduțescu and Georgiana Camelia Stănescu
Journal. Media 2025, 6(1), 22; https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia6010022 - 8 Feb 2025
Abstract
Artificial intelligence has made its mark on the media industry in Romania, and television is one of the sectors most affected by its development. This paper analyzes through a quantitative method the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on television from the perspective of
[...] Read more.
Artificial intelligence has made its mark on the media industry in Romania, and television is one of the sectors most affected by its development. This paper analyzes through a quantitative method the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on television from the perspective of media industry professionals in Romania. The research was conducted usinga quantitative method based on a structured questionnaire. The study focuses on the responses of 128 journalists working in local and national TV stations directly involved in content creation and editorial or production processes. We selected this sample because media specialists have the knowledge to express informed opinions on this subject. The survey results show that artificial intelligence is increasingly used in Romanian newsrooms. Television professionals believe that artificial intelligence tools are helpful and that they can improve the quality of content. However, at the same time, there are serious concerns about the possibility that jobs could be affected. In addition, the risk of misinformation is growing with the increasing use of artificial intelligence tools. Findings suggest that strategic, industry-wide regulations and ethical guidelines are essential to balance AI adoption while safeguarding media integrity. This research may serve media organizations, policymakers, and academia in formulating informed approaches toward AI.
Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Challenges of Journalism in the Age of AI: Information Disorders, Social Gaps and New Opportunities)
►▼
Show Figures
![](https://pub.mdpi-res.com/journalmedia/journalmedia-06-00022/article_deploy/html/images/journalmedia-06-00022-g001-550.jpg?1739009083)
Figure 1
Open AccessArticle
Realist and Constructivist Interpretations and Representations of the Second Nagorno-Karabakh War: As an Event and as a Process
by
Greg Simons and Iulian Chifu
Journal. Media 2025, 6(1), 21; https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia6010021 - 8 Feb 2025
Abstract
The aim of this article is to analyze communications from the presidential and security council websites on the interpretations and representations of the Second Nagorno-Karabakh War to understand how people, places, and events were interpreted and represented in terms of realism and constructivism
[...] Read more.
The aim of this article is to analyze communications from the presidential and security council websites on the interpretations and representations of the Second Nagorno-Karabakh War to understand how people, places, and events were interpreted and represented in terms of realism and constructivism in the geopolitics of the conflict to global audiences. Critical discourse analysis is used as a methodology for highlighting and making sense of texts in terms of the intangible elements of power relations, reputation and brand of the actors, relative balance of ethics and morality of the belligerents, value judgements, and predictions of the war’s outcome. There is a clear tendency to engage in what Sun Tsu and von Clausewitz characterize as the politics of war using brand and reputation management to global audiences of a good and virtuous self-image versus a projected ruthless opponent lacking virtue. This is an exploratory paper with an indicative result, and several apparent trends emerge. One observation suggests that the actor that is militarily weaker tends to communicate more often to shape the political variables that influence the conduct of war. The role of constructivist rhetoric is being used to justify and legitimize realist-oriented policy and practice in war.
Full article
Open AccessArticle
The Podcast Revolution? Exploring Journalistic Pioneers Beyond Legacy Media
by
Vera Katzenberger, Jana Keil and Michael Wild
Journal. Media 2025, 6(1), 20; https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia6010020 - 2 Feb 2025
Abstract
►▼
Show Figures
Podcasts have established themselves in the digital media landscape as an integral part of information gathering and opinion formation for many users. The number of podcast users has stabilized at a high level in recent years. However, podcast producers, including podcast journalists, remain
[...] Read more.
Podcasts have established themselves in the digital media landscape as an integral part of information gathering and opinion formation for many users. The number of podcast users has stabilized at a high level in recent years. However, podcast producers, including podcast journalists, remain a largely unexplored group. This study focuses on podcast journalists and aims to identify the perceptions, motivations, and quality standards relating to their roles in podcasting. It is based on the results of an online survey of 378 podcast journalists from Germany, Austria, and Switzerland. Against a background of the concept of pioneer journalism, this article argues that podcast journalists are innovative contributors to the journalism ecosystem and have positioned themselves as new actors within the field. The findings of this study show that podcast journalists create, produce, and present journalistic content, for instance news or background stories, in the form of audio episodes, and see themselves as both educators and entertainers. They use the creative freedom of podcasting to engage deeply with their audiences and achieve high levels of listener loyalty. While financial gain is not their primary motivation, they have innovated new revenue models. They are committed to the quality of their content and emphasize comprehensibility and accuracy of information.
Full article
![](https://pub.mdpi-res.com/journalmedia/journalmedia-06-00020/article_deploy/html/images/journalmedia-06-00020-g001-550.jpg?1738483372)
Figure 1
Open AccessArticle
Unmasking AI’s Role in the Age of Disinformation: Friend or Foe?
by
Livia García-Faroldi, Laura Teruel and Sonia Blanco
Journal. Media 2025, 6(1), 19; https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia6010019 - 2 Feb 2025
Abstract
This study addresses public perception of the relationship between artificial intelligence (AI) and disinformation. The level of general awareness of AI is considered, and based on this, an analysis is carried out of whether it may favor the creation and distribution of false
[...] Read more.
This study addresses public perception of the relationship between artificial intelligence (AI) and disinformation. The level of general awareness of AI is considered, and based on this, an analysis is carried out of whether it may favor the creation and distribution of false content or, conversely, the public perceive its potential to counteract information disorders. A survey has been conducted on a representative sample of the Andalusian population aged 15 and over (1550 people). The results show that over 90% of the population have heard of AI, although it is less well known among the eldest age group (78%). There is a consensus that AI helps to produce (86%) and distribute (84%) fake news. Descriptive analyses show no major differences by sex, age, social class, ideology, type of activity or size of municipality, although those less educated tend to mention these negative effects to a lesser extent. However, 54% of the population consider that it may help in combating hoaxes, with women, the lower class and the left wing having positive views. Logistic regressions broadly confirm these results, showing that education, ideology and social class are the most relevant factors when explaining opinions about the role of AI in disinformation.
Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Challenges of Journalism in the Age of AI: Information Disorders, Social Gaps and New Opportunities)
►▼
Show Figures
![](https://pub.mdpi-res.com/journalmedia/journalmedia-06-00019/article_deploy/html/images/journalmedia-06-00019-g001-550.jpg?1738827400)
Figure 1
Open AccessArticle
Election Satire: The Evolution of The Daily Show as a Cultural Artifact Reflecting Democratic Processes
by
Najla Lilya Jaballah
Journal. Media 2025, 6(1), 18; https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia6010018 - 28 Jan 2025
Abstract
►▼
Show Figures
The Trump era marked a turning point for political satire, where The Daily Show’s coverage of the last two election cycles reveals a dynamic interplay between satire, ideology, and democratic processes. This study examines how The Daily Show has progressively altered its
[...] Read more.
The Trump era marked a turning point for political satire, where The Daily Show’s coverage of the last two election cycles reveals a dynamic interplay between satire, ideology, and democratic processes. This study examines how The Daily Show has progressively altered its satirical voice and multimodal strategies to capture the changing landscape of U.S. presidential elections, spotlighting the different eras of Trevor Noah in 2020 and Jon Stewart in 2024. It decodes how news satire along with visuals reflect political and cultural moments, and the way social and political representations are depicted in this show. To achieve these aims, a Multimodal Critical Discourse Analysis (MCDA) approach is used to analyze the semiotic and multimodal features of four episodes of The Daily Show, ranging from Noah’s pandemic-era coverage of the 2020 elections to Stewart’s live studio format in 2024. This article reveals both hosts’ role in social and political representation by different means of satirical and multimodal techniques. It highlights how The Daily Show has remained a cultural touchstone, adapting its style and substance to meet the demands of its time.
Full article
![](https://pub.mdpi-res.com/journalmedia/journalmedia-06-00018/article_deploy/html/images/journalmedia-06-00018-g001-550.jpg?1738065600)
Figure 1
Open AccessArticle
Masculinities in Doraemon: A Critical Discourse Analysis
by
Zhouyan Wu and Zhaoxun Song
Journal. Media 2025, 6(1), 17; https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia6010017 - 26 Jan 2025
Abstract
This study conducts a Critical Discourse Analysis of the masculinities of male characters in Doraemon, a famous Japanese manga series. It explores the masculinities in Doraemon from three perspectives by utilising the following Critical Discourse Analysis framework: text, process and society. Five
[...] Read more.
This study conducts a Critical Discourse Analysis of the masculinities of male characters in Doraemon, a famous Japanese manga series. It explores the masculinities in Doraemon from three perspectives by utilising the following Critical Discourse Analysis framework: text, process and society. Five male characters in Doraemon were selected as the main research objects. Firstly, the text analysis of the male characters in terms of their appearances, characteristics, behaviours and values reveals major masculine traits such as the maintenance of patriarchy, the pursuit and yearning for fame and fortune, competition and aggression. Analysing these masculinities can help remind audiences and consumers to be cautious about works that seemingly do not convey gender stereotypes to viewers. The process analysis identifies corresponding masculinities of the creator of Doraemon through his life experiences. Innovative spirit led him to create characters and manga that could both reflect and confront social reality and promote new gender concepts and ideas that were different from the mainstream at the time. The social analysis of Doraemon attributes the masculinities in the manga to Japanese culture, which has been deeply influenced by the culture of the salaryman, Confucianism, androcentrism and Bushido. For audiences in Japan, anime is a way of spreading and consolidating traditional Japanese cultural ideas, at the same time provoking reflection on whether these inherent gender roles are reasonable and should be perpetuated in the contemporary era. For audiences outside of Japan, this manga and cartoon is equivalent to a typical case of the export and recreation of Japanese culture to the world. This study conveys gender equality values, especially in children’s TV programmes.
Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Gender, Television and Digital Media: Representations and Practices in a Platformized Public Landscape)
►▼
Show Figures
![](https://pub.mdpi-res.com/journalmedia/journalmedia-06-00017/article_deploy/html/images/journalmedia-06-00017-g001-550.jpg?1737903673)
Figure 1
Open AccessEditorial
Is Medium Still the Message? The Vague Relationship Between Broadcasting, Streaming, and Media Audiences
by
Anna Podara
Journal. Media 2025, 6(1), 16; https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia6010016 - 26 Jan 2025
Abstract
Marshall McLuhan’s famous assertion that “the medium is the message” and the affordances of a medium (e [...]
Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Situationship between Broadcasting and Streaming Platforms: Exploring the New Landscape of Media Usage)
Open AccessArticle
News Media Effects on Policy Priorities: A Second-Level Agenda-Setting Analysis of Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) Projects in Myanmar
by
Zeyar Oo and Yonghong Dai
Journal. Media 2025, 6(1), 15; https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia6010015 - 25 Jan 2025
Abstract
►▼
Show Figures
This study investigates the impact of the media’s secondary agenda-setting on public perception and policy priorities regarding the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) projects in Myanmar from to 2011–2024. Three hypotheses (Hs) were examined: H1 posits that media coverage aligns with public and
[...] Read more.
This study investigates the impact of the media’s secondary agenda-setting on public perception and policy priorities regarding the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) projects in Myanmar from to 2011–2024. Three hypotheses (Hs) were examined: H1 posits that media coverage aligns with public and policy perspectives; H2 proposes that media emphasis on specific attributes influences their prominence in public opinion and policymaking; and H3 suggests that public opinion mediates the relationship between media coverage and policy priorities, indicating an indirect media influence on policymaking. This study employed a cross-sectional research design, utilizing both quantitative content analysis and survey methodologies. The content comprises the analysis of two news outlets’ coverage (n = 144), surveys with 385 respondents (n = 385), and in-depth interviews with 30 participants (n = 30), and the findings revealed a significant positive correlation between media coverage and public opinion and policy priorities (r = 0.86, r = 0.81, respectively). SEM path analysis reveals that the media agenda indirectly shapes the policy agenda through the public agenda, with an indirect effect path coefficient of 0.718, highlighting the media’s role in policymaking processes. This is evidenced by a significant correlation between media coverage and public opinion (p < 0.05), and a strong direct association between public opinion and policy priorities (p < 0.05). This study extends the agenda-setting theory by empirically demonstrating the media’s indirect effect on policy formation in global infrastructure projects within a developing Southeast Asian country. Future studies should examine the evolution of media patterns across different administrations, including the current one. The results also suggest examining the broader media portrayal of governance issues and conducting extensive research on the media’s impact on public opinion.
Full article
![](https://pub.mdpi-res.com/journalmedia/journalmedia-06-00015/article_deploy/html/images/journalmedia-06-00015-g001-550.jpg?1737797985)
Figure 1
Open AccessArticle
Emotionalization of the 2021–2022 Global Energy Crisis Coverage: Analyzing the Rhetorical Appeals as Manipulation Means in the Mainstream Media
by
Ekaterina Veselinovna Teneva
Journal. Media 2025, 6(1), 14; https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia6010014 - 24 Jan 2025
Abstract
As the issues of the world’s overreliance on fossil fuels still remain unresolved, mainstream media play a central role in influencing public attitudes towards energy sources. This article aimed to consider Aristotle’s rhetorical appeals as manipulation means in the news coverage of the
[...] Read more.
As the issues of the world’s overreliance on fossil fuels still remain unresolved, mainstream media play a central role in influencing public attitudes towards energy sources. This article aimed to consider Aristotle’s rhetorical appeals as manipulation means in the news coverage of the 2021–2022 global energy crisis. Using computer-aided text analysis, media framing, discourse, and rhetorical analyses, this paper analyzes 600 news articles published on the websites of the four mainstream media sources from the key countries that were affected by the crisis. The results confirmed emotionalization of the news coverage that occurred through the use of similar rhetorical appeals and emotive language means aimed at inducing positive or negative feelings and shaping public opinion. The UK and US mainstream media appeared to rely more on the opinions of political, business, and energy authorities, highlighting a high level of politicization of their coverage. The findings also indicated polarization of the attitudes in the coverage, with mainly negative narratives about fossil fuels and more positive narratives about renewable energies, which contributed to public opinion manipulation and energy decision-making. This study opens up perspectives for future research on media emotions and rhetorical appeals as powerful manipulation means in applied linguistics, rhetoric, and journalism.
Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Challenges for the European Union from the Perspective of Journalism, Political Communication and Digital Platforms)
►▼
Show Figures
![](https://pub.mdpi-res.com/journalmedia/journalmedia-06-00014/article_deploy/html/images/journalmedia-06-00014-g001-550.jpg?1737721773)
Figure 1
Open AccessArticle
Participation of Social Media Influencers in Communicating the Global Health Crisis: An Observation of Chinese-Origin Influencers Across Argentina, the UK, and Spain During COVID-19
by
Yiheng Wang and Felipe Navarro Nicoletti
Journal. Media 2025, 6(1), 13; https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia6010013 - 24 Jan 2025
Abstract
This work focuses on the digital communicative practices of influencers, as the COVID-19 pandemic has opened a communicational doorway from diverse perspectives, and social media has emerged as an important tool for people to maintain contact and acquire information. Additionally, the preventive and
[...] Read more.
This work focuses on the digital communicative practices of influencers, as the COVID-19 pandemic has opened a communicational doorway from diverse perspectives, and social media has emerged as an important tool for people to maintain contact and acquire information. Additionally, the preventive and obligatory social distancing measures have driven us to reconsider methods of human interaction. Digital communication as the primary means of connection in the context of COVID-19 encompasses social interaction, entertainment, and informative channels. These facets usually coalesce within a single space or intersect when the practices of influencers are observed. Therefore, three influencers of Chinese origin residing in different countries are analysed, given that China was the initial epicentre of COVID-19. Influencers of Chinese descent living in the United Kingdom, Spain, and Argentina are selected to enable an exploration of more sociocultural diversity. The significance of influencers in disseminating information and content to society continues, according to observation, particularly among younger demographics. Although their main efforts do not reside in communicating COVID-19 within the context of the pandemic, their contribution indicates a complementary solution to fostering social interaction and debunking discourses of hatred aimed at individuals of Chinese or Asian descent.
Full article
(This article belongs to the Collection Role of Media and Journalism during COVID-19 Pandemic: Lessons Learned and Future Challenges)
Open AccessArticle
Cross-Border Communication Strategies: An Approach to Spanish Euroregions on Twitter (X)
by
Rubén Rivas-de-Roca, Ricardo Domínguez-García and Concha Pérez-Curiel
Journal. Media 2025, 6(1), 12; https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia6010012 - 18 Jan 2025
Abstract
In a political climate of social polarization and distrust in public institutions, which in turn fosters misinformation, the European Union (EU) faces the challenge of becoming closer to its citizens. At the same time, the EU has well-established collaboration mechanisms at the local
[...] Read more.
In a political climate of social polarization and distrust in public institutions, which in turn fosters misinformation, the European Union (EU) faces the challenge of becoming closer to its citizens. At the same time, the EU has well-established collaboration mechanisms at the local and regional levels. In this context, this study aims to analyze the Euroregions project, one of the strategies used by the EU to manage the different regions of Europe through cross-border collaboration. Thus, the main objective of this study is to find out, using the social network X (formerly Twitter), the communication strategies deployed by the regional governments that make up each of the five Spanish Euroregions on institutions of cross-border cooperation. The results show that regional governments do not promote effective communication strategies to publicize these Euroregions. Rather, these governments try to communicate their management success, focusing their discourse on the issue of European funds and thus generating a situation of misinformation around the benefits of belonging to the European Union. Our findings contribute to the budding literature on regional European areas, arguing that certain political actions could ameliorate the feeling of disaffection of the population towards European institutions.
Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Challenges for the European Union from the Perspective of Journalism, Political Communication and Digital Platforms)
►▼
Show Figures
![](https://pub.mdpi-res.com/journalmedia/journalmedia-06-00012/article_deploy/html/images/journalmedia-06-00012-g001-550.jpg?1737187953)
Figure 1
Open AccessArticle
From Guns to Mental Health and Accountability: Decoding Media Narratives and Audience Reactions in Public Mass Shootings
by
Maurice N. Emelu and Brent Brossmann
Journal. Media 2025, 6(1), 11; https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia6010011 - 18 Jan 2025
Abstract
►▼
Show Figures
Public mass shootings pose a critical safety challenge in the U.S. This study investigates how media framing relates to public online engagement, focusing on gun regulation, mental health, and individual and political accountability across five major TV networks: ABC, CNN, Fox News, MSNBC,
[...] Read more.
Public mass shootings pose a critical safety challenge in the U.S. This study investigates how media framing relates to public online engagement, focusing on gun regulation, mental health, and individual and political accountability across five major TV networks: ABC, CNN, Fox News, MSNBC, and NBC. Using a mixed-methods approach, the research analyzes 678 news reports and 7605 audience comments. Findings reveal significant differences in audience engagement based on framing, and in key variables show audiences taking opposite positions to their news network’s narratives. ABC, CNN, and NBC’s thematic framing, highlighting systemic failures, elicits more balanced responses, whereas Fox News and MSNBC’s episodic framing, emphasizing individual or political accountability, correlates with polarized reactions. This research extends media framing theories by showing how episodic framing reduces support for systemic reforms, emphasizing personal responsibility. The study offers crucial insights for scholars, policymakers, and journalists on media’s role in shaping public discourse on gun violence.
Full article
![](https://pub.mdpi-res.com/journalmedia/journalmedia-06-00011/article_deploy/html/images/journalmedia-06-00011-g001-550.jpg?1737182595)
Figure 1
Open AccessArticle
Gender Inequality in Spain’s Official Music Charts: Neither Representation nor Success for Female Artists (2008–2020)
by
Cande Sánchez-Olmos
Journal. Media 2025, 6(1), 10; https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia6010010 - 16 Jan 2025
Abstract
This study seeks to investigate gender inequality in the Spanish’s official music charts from 2008 to 2020, using a quantitative methodology. The dataset comprises 1300 entries sourced from Promusicae’s official charts, evenly divided between albums and singles. Firstly, this analysis evaluates the frequency
[...] Read more.
This study seeks to investigate gender inequality in the Spanish’s official music charts from 2008 to 2020, using a quantitative methodology. The dataset comprises 1300 entries sourced from Promusicae’s official charts, evenly divided between albums and singles. Firstly, this analysis evaluates the frequency of artist representation; secondly, it assesses the success achieved by gender; and finally, it examines disparities in featured collaborations. The findings indicate that male artists appear almost three times more frequently than their female counterparts on both charts, achieve a higher amount of points, and dominate the role of featuring collaborations. Notably, Spanish female artists are predominantly absent from the top positions in the singles chart. Moreover, there is an absence of female bands in the top 50. The observed outcomes align with previous research concerning gender inequality in the United States and the United Kingdom, highlighting a persistent structural gender inequality within Spain’s music industry throughout the reviewed period, which systematically undermines the creativity of female artists.
Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Gender, Television and Digital Media: Representations and Practices in a Platformized Public Landscape)
►▼
Show Figures
![](https://pub.mdpi-res.com/journalmedia/journalmedia-06-00010/article_deploy/html/images/journalmedia-06-00010-g001-550.jpg?1737017833)
Figure 1
Open AccessArticle
Covering the Israeli–Palestinian Conflict: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Al Jazeera English and BBC’s Online Reporting on the 2023 Gaza War
by
Kareem El Damanhoury, Faisal Saleh and Madeleine Lebovic
Journal. Media 2025, 6(1), 9; https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia6010009 - 16 Jan 2025
Abstract
►▼
Show Figures
The Hamas surprise attack on southern Israel on 7 October 2023, and the Israeli military response unleashed a catastrophic episode of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict and exacerbated broader tensions in the region. This study compares Al Jazeera English (AJE) and BBC’s coverage of and
[...] Read more.
The Hamas surprise attack on southern Israel on 7 October 2023, and the Israeli military response unleashed a catastrophic episode of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict and exacerbated broader tensions in the region. This study compares Al Jazeera English (AJE) and BBC’s coverage of and discourse around key events in the early stages of the 2023 Israel–Gaza War. Using critical discourse analysis as an analytical framework, this study employs mixed methods to compare transitivity, intertextuality, and lexicalization as key discursive features in the two outlets’ coverage of the war. Counter to previous qualitative works, this study quantitatively reveals no variation between AJE and BBC’s use of active voice yet points to key qualitative differences in the discursive treatment of Palestinians and the reporting on death tolls. It further demonstrates drastic differences in the quoting patterns and negative lexicalization of the early phases of the war, with AJE taking a more balanced approach and BBC refraining from emphasizing accusations against Israel of committing “genocide”, “ethnic cleansing”, “terrorism”, and “war crimes”. The study concludes with a discussion of the implications of differential discourses around the Gaza War and the Israeli–Palestinian conflict in international media.
Full article
![](https://pub.mdpi-res.com/journalmedia/journalmedia-06-00009/article_deploy/html/images/journalmedia-06-00009-g001-550.jpg?1737014439)
Figure 1
Open AccessArticle
Does Online Privacy Literacy Affect Privacy Protection Behaviour? A Mixed-Methods Study of Digital Media Users in the MENA Region
by
Walaa Bajnaid and Shuaa Aljasir
Journal. Media 2025, 6(1), 8; https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia6010008 - 9 Jan 2025
Abstract
►▼
Show Figures
This study examines the correlation between Online Privacy Literacy (OPL) and privacy protection behaviour (PPB), including evidence of any correlation between the two. In addition, it considers whether factors of intention, attitude, perceived behaviour, subjective norms, and perceived behaviour control mediate the relationship
[...] Read more.
This study examines the correlation between Online Privacy Literacy (OPL) and privacy protection behaviour (PPB), including evidence of any correlation between the two. In addition, it considers whether factors of intention, attitude, perceived behaviour, subjective norms, and perceived behaviour control mediate the relationship between OPL and PPB online, and whether the relationships between demographic variables may act as moderators. This research took a sequential mixed-methods approach, with Study One employing an online survey of 1040 voluntary digital media users in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA), and Study Two undertaking online interviews with ninety-five participants. The results found a relationship between OPL and PPB. In addition, subjective norms and perceived behaviour control also mediate relationship between OPL and PPB in MENA. Furthermore, while all the participants revealed paradoxical attitudes to PPB, the empirical study highlighted that the male participants tended to demonstrate greater concerns in relation to OPL.
Full article
![](https://pub.mdpi-res.com/journalmedia/journalmedia-06-00008/article_deploy/html/images/journalmedia-06-00008-g001-550.jpg?1736416866)
Figure 1
Highly Accessed Articles
Latest Books
E-Mail Alert
News
Topics
![loading...](https://pub.mdpi-res.com/img/loading_circle.gif?9a82694213036313?1739526160)
Conferences
Special Issues
Special Issue in
Journalism and Media
Mediating Sexual Violence in the #MeToo Era
Guest Editors: Rebecca Stringer, Georgia KnowlesDeadline: 28 February 2025
Special Issue in
Journalism and Media
The Challenges of Journalism in the Age of AI: Information Disorders, Social Gaps and New Opportunities
Guest Editors: Simón Peña-Fernández, Ainara Larrondo-Ureta, Koldobika Meso-AyerdiDeadline: 28 February 2025
Special Issue in
Journalism and Media
Sociality and Digitality: An Exploration of New Forms of Digital Social Connection and Belonging in Africa
Guest Editors: Anthea Garman, Nonhlanhla NdlovuDeadline: 28 February 2025
Special Issue in
Journalism and Media
Gender, Television and Digital Media: Representations and Practices in a Platformized Public Landscape
Guest Editors: Rita Basílio Simões, Ioanna Vovou, Fabiana PiccininDeadline: 31 March 2025
Topical Collections
Topical Collection in
Journalism and Media
Role of Media and Journalism during COVID-19 Pandemic: Lessons Learned and Future Challenges
Collection Editor: María Luisa Humanes