4.1. Fully Tetrahedral Networks and the Ratio ONB/Zn
The Zn borophosphate glasses have the potential to form continuous disordered networks of corner-connected tetrahedra with all oxygen atoms being two-fold coordinated. The Zn metaphosphate glass (50 mol% P
2O
5) has been considered a continuous tetrahedral network for a long time now [
40], which is manifested in its properties [
41]. This classification is not entirely accurate because the Zn−O coordination number is slightly larger than four, which is also reflected in the corresponding bond lengths (
Figure S4 and
Figure 5). The ZnO
4 units of the β-Zn(PO
3)
2 crystal [
37] show a fifth Zn−O bond of 0.28 nm in length. Similarly, a few longer distances exist for the investigated glasses. Nevertheless, the metaphosphate glass zbp01 and the borophosphate glasses of 50 mol% P
2O
5 (zbp02, zbp09, zbp03, and zbp04) show the narrowest Zn−O peaks, together with the smallest distance contributions at ~0.212 nm (
Figure 7a and
Figure S6); this is evidence that a great majority of Zn ions are in tetrahedral units that have their four corners in Zn−O−P linkages.
The Zn−O peaks of the samples possessing less than 50 mol% P
2O
5 show increased contributions at ~0.212 nm that indicate O
NB shared by two Zn. A significant increase in the corresponding
NZnO is not detected. Two samples (zbp10, zbp11) of the series with the fixed O/P ratio of 3.25 have more than 50 mol% P
2O
5. The zbp11 sample shows significantly increased values of
NZnO,
rZnO, and peak width (fwhm). In this case, the O
NB/Zn ratio is larger than four, and some larger units than ZnO
4 are formed. Similar to the binary ZnO-P
2O
5 system [
25,
26,
42], the borophosphate networks behave in such a way that avoids PO
4 units (Q
3, Q
2) with terminal P=O double bonds. The possible second bond partner of this oxygen is Zn but not B, for reasons of bond valences. This is in contrast to what has been found for the Zn aluminophosphate glasses, where the Al
3+ cations form AlO
5 and AlO
6 units for the P
2O
5-rich and ZnO-poor compositions [
24]. This structural flexibility of Al allows the glass-forming range to reach the binary Al
2O
3-P
2O
5 border. However, similar to the BPO
4, the range of the AlPO
4 composition is excluded for its strong crystallization tendency.
On the side of the binary B
2O
3-P
2O
5 system, BPO
4 crystals [
14,
15] are known, but disordered networks of PO
4 and BO
4 units are not formed. The structure of BPO
4 consists of
and
units, each connected via their four corners by P−O−B bridges.
Figure 8a shows the bond valences in the BPO
4 crystals formed by these units. The tetrahedral network in the Zn(PO
3)
2 metaphosphate glass consists of
and ZnO
4 units (
Figure 8b). If one connects the Zn(PO
3)
2 and the BPO
4 compositions (50 mol% P
2O
5) in
Figure 1, their mixture could create networks of ZnO
4, BO
4, and PO
4 units whose corners are connected exclusively by twofold coordinated oxygens. That behavior receives support from the narrow Zn−O distance peaks (
Figure 7a). However, the question arises as to how the structures made of Zn(PO
3)
2 and BPO
4 with mixed
and
groups can be arranged, whereby the isolated ZnO
4 and BO
4 units must be provided with the necessary bond valences. Starting from the side of the ZnO-rich glasses, the problem is solved using a structural speciation reaction:
where the oxygens of the
(a Q
1 unit) are shared with one ZnO
4, one PO
4, and two BO
4 units, as shown in
Figure 8c. The Q
1 groups terminate the phosphate chains. Most ZnO
4 corners interact with the remaining Q
2 groups while the BO
4 tetrahedra connect the Q
1 and Q
0 groups. Neither the ZnO
4 nor the BO
4 could exist in isolated sites alone with only Q
1 neighbors (with
or
, respectively). The ZnO
4 would have to share O
NB and the BO
4 would not receive sufficient bond valence. Approaching the composition of the zbp04 sample, nearly all Q
2 have changed to Q
1 groups. A high ordering of the ZnO
4 and BO
4 is required so that both groups can receive the necessary bond valences. Fortunately, a further solution exists for the bond valences, which stabilizes the disordered borophosphate networks, whereby some of the oxygens that, for example, would form P−O−B bonds, are instead incorporated into B−O−B bonds, necessitating the concomitant formation of new P−O−P bonds to produce a weak polymerization of the phosphate network [
13]. This rearrangement is described by the following:
Figure 8d illustrates an arrangement of a
with a
unit.
11B MAS NMR has determined the fractions of the
in addition to the
units [
13]. Hence, the O/P ratio is no longer exactly related to the Q
n distribution. Four of the Zn borophosphate glasses used in [
13] have ~50 mol% P
2O
5. The glass with the highest B
2O
3 fraction (18.5 mol%) was found with the highest
fraction (88%). The other samples had ~35%
in addition to the
units. Reactions according to Equation (3) take place in glasses of high Q
2 fractions (high ZnO content), whereas reactions according to Equation (4) dominate when the Q
2 units are already in the minority (equal amounts of ZnO and B
2O
3). The fraction of oxygens that are available for coordinating the Zn
2+ cations is preserved when the fraction of
units changes. Equation (4) does not change the numbers of P−O and B−O bonds, as illustrated in
Figure S7. That allows us to calculate the accurate O
NB/Zn without knowing the accurate
fraction and this O
NB/Zn ratio largely determines the Zn−O environments.
Now, the question of how one can divide the oxygen fractions to coordinate the Zn and B is discussed. Simply knowing the sample composition of the ternary phosphate glasses is not sufficient for addressing this. The available number of oxygens is derived by subtracting the number of P−O−P bonds per PO4 and that is calculated from the total O/P ratio. In analogy to the structural behavior of the Zn phosphate glasses (cf. Introduction), all oxygens will find two neighbors with decreasing P2O5 content (P, B, Zn) before threefold coordinated oxygen sites occur. Sophisticated considerations have to take into account the different properties of the two sorts of cations besides the P5+ such as charge balance, field strength, preference of definite oxygen polyhedra, or threefold coordinated oxygen sites.
A general model (model 1) takes into account the different requirements for the charge compensation of the Zn
2+ and B
3+ cations. It is assumed that the two cationic species act independently of each other and are linked to the different Q
n with equal probability, which makes sense for a simple approach. The corresponding O
NB/Zn and O
B/B values are obtained with the following:
and
where the
ci are the concentrations of the four sorts of atoms. This approach produces O
B/B ratios that are too large (>4) for all samples, as shown in
Figure 9, where the ratios are considered for the series with constant P
2O
5 contents at 50 mol% (a) and constant O/P ratios of 3.25 (b). The boron cannot meet this coordination behavior. In other words, the Zn−O environments and BO
4 units cannot form independently of each other. Preferences for special Q
n neighbors, as shown in
Figure 8c,d, must be effective. In the range of the glasses studied, the situation is quite simple because
11B MAS NMR detected only BO
4 (no BO
3) [
13]. When
NBO is fixed to the number four for BO
4 units, a well-defined fraction of oxygens is used as bridging oxygens by the borons. Then, the oxygens formed as non-bridging in the PO
4 units are used for the coordination of the zinc (model 2) with the following ratio:
For glasses with P
2O
5 contents of 50 mol%, model 2 predicts that O
NB/Zn = 4. This value is exactly what is necessary for isolated ZnO
4 units and fully tetrahedral networks (filled squares in
Figure 9a). Differently, the fixed O/P ratios of 3.25 produce a continuous increase in O
NB/Zn with increasing B
2O
3 content (cf.
Figure 9b). For completeness, the O
NB/Zn ratios according to model 2 for the zbp12 and zbp13 samples result in 3.10 and 3.27, respectively.
The O
NB/Zn ratio becomes less than four for glasses with P
2O
5 contents below 50 mol%. Then, two ZnO
4 units must share some of their O
NB neighbors. The obtained O
NB/Zn ratios are still larger than three, which means a few connected ZnO
4 units are present, but not any interconnected ZnO
4 substructures. If one looks at the binary ZnO-B
2O
3 glasses obtained with 54 to 70 mol% ZnO [
19], theO
NB/Zn ratios reach only 1.5 to 1.9 (
Table S3). For the ZnO
4 units existing in these glasses, each O
NB is shared by at least two Zn and extended substructures of interconnected ZnO
4 exist. Octahedral ZnO
6 units were proposed for these glasses [
19]. However, EXAFS and X-ray scattering suggest that ZnO
4 units are the dominant moiety [
43]. The
NZnO value of 4.3 for our Zn borate glass is similar to those of the borophosphate glasses. Its mean bond length of 0.200 nm is the largest among those of the other glasses (cf.
Figure 7c). The Zn−O distances of zbp14 show large variations due to the massive need for shared O
NB. Highly distorted ZnO
5 polyhedra co-exist beside ZnO
4.
Figure 9b shows strongly increasing O
NB/Zn ratios > 4 with increasing B
2O
3 contents. Thus, a significant increase in
NZnO is forced. According to the Zn−O distances (
Figure 5b and
Figure 7b), the
NZnO of the zbp11 sample is significantly larger than four but it is expected to be less than five. Otherwise, in the case of
NZnO < O
NB/Zn, some terminal P=O double bonds must occur. According to the other limitations of the zbp11 sample (
NPO = 3.6), its P
2O
5 content should be a little less than the nominal value. The formation of homogeneous glasses reaches the limit for this sample as reported for such compositions [
22].
Model 1 was introduced assuming equal preferences of B and Zn for the oxygens of the different Q
n. The B and Zn would form their environments independently. However, that is not possible with the limit
NBO ≤ 4. For the ZnO-Al
2O
3-P
2O
5 glasses, the Al−O coordination number can increase up to six and the changes of
NAlO according to model 1 are possible in a large concentration range. The
NAlO values were calculated from the fractions of the AlO
4, AlO
5, and AlO
6 units, which were determined with
27Al MAS NMR [
24]. One of the glasses is a compositional analog to that of the zbp11 sample. That Al−O coordination number was 5.2 and close to 5.0, which resulted from model 1 (
Figure 9b). The structural analysis of Na
2O-Al
2O
3-P
2O
5 glasses has shown that all oxygen is used to break P−O−P bridges [
44]. The compositional dependence of
NAlO was found to follow other rules than simply a continuous increase with the O
NB fractions. Abrupt changes from
NAlO = 4 to 6 were found [
44], which indicates the greater stability of the AlO
4 and AlO
6 polyhedra if compared with the AlO
5. The Na
+ coordinating the oxygens in Al−O−P bridges is essential for this behavior. Certainly, special preferences with the different Q
n groups exist.
In this work, the different preferences for the oxygens of the Q2, Q1, and Q0 units with the Zn and B polyhedra are due to the restrictions of the B to BO4 units (model 2). The different field strengths of Zn2+ and B3+ are not essential in this context. The maximum limit NBO = 4 made the model considerations comparably simple for the borophosphate glasses of this study. As long as the NBO value = 4 is less than the OB/B ratio of model 1, the ONB/Zn ratio can be calculated and it determines the Zn−O environments. The success of model 2 became obvious in the predicted behavior of the Zn−O distances with the narrow peaks along the line of 50 mol% P2O5.
4.2. The Stabilization of the BO4 Units and the Boron Anomaly
BO
4 tetrahedra and planar BO
3 triangles are the units in the crystalline forms of B
2O
3 [
45,
46]. The BO
4 unit is the variant with the densest packing and can be formed provided that its bond valences can be balanced. In the high-pressure B
2O
3 crystal [
45], charge compensation is realized with oxygens which are threefold-linked to borons. Usually, glasses are only obtained when there is no or little threefold connected oxygen in the network. Accordingly, vitreous B
2O
3 forms BO
3 units. Other mechanisms can deplete electron density from the B−O bonds in the BO
4 unit resulting in four bonds with the necessary valences of ~0.75 vu. The BO
4 units in binary borate glasses were identified as the origin of non-continuous property changes known as the boron anomaly [
12].
For the borophosphate glasses, the BPO
4 crystals [
14,
15] show the mutual benefit for the B and P atoms with a deficit and excess valence electron density in the B−O−P bridges of the tetrahedral networks (cf.
Figure 8a). This type of valence transfer is effective throughout the Zn borophosphate glasses studied, whereby the BO
4 units do not form B−O−Zn bridges. The typical PO
4–Zn interactions are shown in
Figure 10a,b, which were discussed above. The interaction of the Zn with the oxygen sites in P−O−B bridges is rather improbable. Each Zn−O bond of a ZnO
4 requires a bond valence of ~0.50 vu, which is too much to be shared with these oxygens. For the same reasons, the oxygen corner of a ZnO
4 unit cannot be the oxygen between two BO
3 units or a pair of BO
3 and BO
4 (analogously to
Figure 10g). These circumstances suggest a relation to the lack of glass formation in the B
2O
3-rich and P
2O
5-poor regions of the Zn borophosphate system. There is one exception; the oxygen sites in B−O−B between BO
4 pairs can coordinate a Zn (cf.
Figure 10d), as found in several Zn borate crystals [
47,
48,
49,
50]. However, this feature is not sufficient to stabilize any glasses poor in P
2O
5, but it can occur in the glasses of moderate P
2O
5 content until just under 50 mol%.
Binary Zn borate glasses are obtained in a small range rich in ZnO [
19], where a significant fraction of O
NB in BO
3-triangles already exists (O
NB/Zn ≥ 1.5). Two Zn
2+ cations share each O
NB (cf.
Figure 10c), which means that at least three such O
NB corners are present in each Zn-O environment. The scattering results of the Zn borate glass (zbp14) suggest a fraction of ZnO
5 units in addition to the ZnO
4. The ZnO
5 have bonds of unequal lengths whose two more distant corners can coordinate the oxygens in any B−O−B bridge. The corner of a ZnO
4 can only coordinate an O
B in a bridge between two BO
4 units (cf.
Figure 10d), as explained in the preceding paragraph.
Similar to the ZnO
4 units, the Na
+ cations have total coordination numbers close to four (
Table S2). The cation oxygen distance is larger for Na
+ and the width (fwhm) of the Na−O peak is ~0.042 nm (cf.
Figure S8), much more than the ~0.017 nm of the Zn−O peak (
Figure 6). These parameters express the large flexibility of the Na
+ cations to form distorted oxygen environments.
Figure 10e,h show the interaction of the Na
+ with the O
NB of the P or B atoms, which is similar to the Zn−O bonds in
Figure 10a–c. Here, the Na-O bonds are drawn with bond valences of ~0.25 vu as belonging to a NaO
4 tetrahedron. This value can vary according to the distortions of the NaO
m polyhedron, including the variations in
m. The Na−O bonds are dominantly ionic, but it is better not to mix the bond valences and electronic charges in the schematic presentations. The weak Na−O interaction allows the Na
+ to approach the O
B sites in the P−O−B and B−O−B bridges (cf.
Figure 10f,g). The corresponding oxygens are still quasi-twofold linked. The third partner Na
+ forms a flexible bond that maintains sufficient flexibility to the disordered network as necessary for glass formation.
It was emphasized that the BO
4 units in the Zn borophosphate glasses with P
2O
5 contents of ≥50 mol% are charge-balanced by PO
4 units (
Figure 8). The Zn
2+ cations can approach oxygens in B−O−B bridges only for glasses with a P
2O
5 content < 50 mol% and then also contribute to the BO
4 stabilization. Of course, the BO
4 fractions in the binary Zn borate glasses [
19] are charge-balanced by the Zn
2+ cations. What about the Na borophosphate glasses? One can compare them with the known crystal structures. The Na
2B
8O
13 crystal, which is free of phosphate [
51], shows two mechanisms for BO
4 stabilization through Na
+. The lengths of the B−O bonds suggest that the surplus negative charge of the BO
4 is not only balanced by the Na
+ coordinating the BO
4 corners, but it is also transferred to the neighboring BO
3 triangles. The bond lengths in the BO
3 units are strengthened in B−O−B bridges to the BO
4 (~0.134 nm), whereas they are elongated in bridges to other BO
3 (~0.138 nm). Thus, the Na
+ cations also act across the BO
3 triangles as neighbors of the BO
4. It is to be presumed that there is no serious difference between the depletion effects of electron density from the bonds in the BO
4 in the direction of the PO
4 units or the Zn
2+ and Na
+ cations.
4.3. Different Effects of Zn and Na on the P−O Bond Lengths
The lengths of the P−O bonds in the zbp13 and nbp13 glasses with compositions with an O/P ratio of 3.5 reveal different effects of the Zn
2+ and Na
+ cations. Binary phosphate glasses with the same O/P ratio (pyrophosphates with O
NB/O
B = 6:1) possess two different lengths of P−O bonds, the P−O
NB and P−O
B bonds, with a frequency ratio of 3:1 [
23,
36]. The obtained distribution of bond lengths of a corresponding glass (ZnPbP
2O
7 [
36]) is shown in
Figure 11, and its structure is illustrated in
Figure S9a.
The neutron diffraction results of zbp13 and nbp13 also show two types of P−O bonds (cf.
Figures S3 and S4). The frequency numbers of the two P−O bonds are obtained with 2.8 and 1.0 for zbp13 and 2.5 and 1.3 for nbp13 (cf.
Table S2). The corresponding ratios of bonds are similar to that of the ZnPbP
2O
7 glass, though the P−O
NB/P−O
B ratios of 9:11 for zbp13 and nbp13 are formally quite different from 3:1 (cf.
Figure S9). This difference is explained by short P−O
B bonds in the P−O−B bridges if compared with those in the P−O−P bridges.
For the zbp13 sample, the ratio is close to 3:1, and the P−O peak agrees with that of the ZnPbP
2O
7 glass (cf.
Figure 11). The nbp13 sample has a slightly larger fraction of P−O bonds with lengths of ~0.160 nm. An effect that could increase this P−O fraction is the formation of B−O−B bridges between two BO
4 according to Equation (4), which is accompanied by additional P−O−P bridges. A borophosphate glass with a composition close to that of zbp13 has 27.7% boron in
units [
13]. According to the glass composition of zbp13 and excluding B−O−B bridges, the P−O bonds can be divided into 25% in P−O−P bridges, 30% in P−O−B bridges, and 45% in P−O
NB. A total of 27.7% of the B in
units means that there is an increase in the bonds in P−O−P bridges from 25% to 27%. Therefore, the corresponding increase in the number of longer P−O
B bonds is insignificant (<0.1).
The Na borophosphate glass nbp13 is expected to be almost free of B−O−B bridges, as has been reported for a similar glass (sample
x = 0.125 in [
10]). The structures of the Na
3BP
2O
8 [
16] and Na
5B
2P
3O
13 [
17] crystals help to understand the larger fraction of the longer P−O bonds, although the crystal’s compositions differ somewhat from that of nbp13 (cf.
Figure 1). The Na borophosphate crystals have isolated PO
4 units (Q
0). From the point of view of binary phosphates [
23], only a single P−O distance should occur. However, two distances become obvious (cf.
Figure 11). Half of the oxygens of the PO
4 units participate in P−O−B bridges and these oxygens have a Na
+ cation in their close vicinity, as illustrated in
Figure 10f. These Na
+ stabilize the BO
4 but also reduce the bond valence in the adjacent PO
4 (elongation of the P−O bond). The other two PO
4 corners coordinate only Na
+ cations, as shown in
Figure 10e, and the corresponding short P−O bonds carry the surplus bond valence taken over from the others. The difference in both P−O bond strengths in these crystals is a little smaller than that in the zbp13 and ZnPbP
2O
7 glasses, the latter with bond valences of 1.33 and 1.0 vu (cf.
Figure 11). For the nbp13 glass, the changes in bond lengths appear less pronounced than in the crystals. Again, 25% of the P−O bonds are in P−O−P bridges, 30% in P−O−B bridges, and 45% in P−O
NB. To achieve the right ratio of the short and long P−O bonds of the nbp13 sample (2.5:1.3), the fraction of the P−O−B bridges is split into two parts, those with a Na
+ close nearby and those free of any Na
+ neighbor. Then, 30% of the P−O bonds in the P−O−B bridges are elongated, indicating the effect of a Na
+ cation. The other 70% of P−O bonds in P−O−B bridges are not affected by any Na
+ cations and have lengths similar to those of typical P−O
NB bonds. This difference from zbp13 means that the BO
4 units in the nbp13 glass undergo charge compensation equally by Na
+ cations and PO
4 units. The ZnO
4 units in zbp13 contribute less because their corners do not participate in P−O−B bridges.
Two species of P−O−B bridges are suggested for nbp13 that seem to be easily distinguishable. One is coordinated to a Na
+ cation, and the other is not. On the other hand, a clear separation of the P−O−B bridges into those with and without a Na
+ neighbor might be questionable due to the large width of the Na−O distance peak. Both P−O peak components overlay with each other. The analyses of the O 1s spectra (XPS) did not distinguish two different types of P−O−B bridges in the Na and Zn borophosphate glasses [
8,
20]. Nevertheless, the effect of the Na
+ on the P−O−B is real and it is not effective for Zn
2+. Another approach supports the fact that only part of the P−O−B bridges of nbp13 can have Na
+ neighbors. The total Na−O coordination number is calculated assuming all oxygens in the P−O
NB bonds or P−O−B bridges are present with three or one Na
+ neighbors, as shown in
Figure 10e,f, respectively. Then, for nbp13, a
NNaO value of ~6.0 is obtained, which noticeably exceeds the value of 4.0 obtained from scattering. Accordingly, only part of the P−O−B can have a Na
+ neighbor (30% as estimated for nbp13). Also, the O
NB shown in
Figure 10e can only have 2.3 Na
+ neighbors on average instead of 3 Na
+ neighbors. These conditions mean that only a third of the Na
+ can coordinate the oxygen in a P−O−B bridge. All other oxygens in the Na−O bonds belong to the P−O
NB bonds. Here, only the behavior of a single sample is discussed. The corresponding relations will strongly change with the glass compositions.
The ionic forces of Na
+ are weak compared to strong P−O and B−O bonds. Therefore, Na
+ does not form dense oxygen environments, e.g., NaO
6 octahedra. The broad Na−O distance peaks (cf.
Figure S8) correspond to
NNaO values of 4.5 and 4.0 in the glasses and are thus significantly smaller than those (5 and 6) in the related crystals [
16,
17], accompanied by shorter bonds. Likewise, the number and bond valences of the P−O
NB bonds in zbp13 (cf.
Figure 10b) would allow the Zn
2+ to form ZnO
6 octahedra, which is not the case. The strong bonds in the PO
4 and BO
4 units and the comparatively high cross-linking density of the borophosphate networks prevent the modifier cations from forming compact oxygen polyhedra.
The relation between the network structure and the modifier environments was also used to interpret the mixed network-former effect. The average number of O
B per glass-forming unit,
BO, calculated for the
yNa
2O-
xB
2O
3-(1−
x)P
2O
5 glasses, characterizes the stiffness of the network [
6,
10]. This value’s behavior correlates well with the
Tg values. A larger
BO means an increasing network stiffness, which is accompanied by more disordered modifier environments; in this case, it is the NaO
m polyhedron. In addition, the O
NB/Na ratio decreases (Equation (7)). These changes explain the reduced activation energies for ionic transport when the B
2O
3 content increases while the Na
2O content is constant [
6,
10]. The average number of bridging corners per network-forming unit,
BCNFU, is a more plausible value with
BCNFU = 2
BO. For the borophosphate glasses, it is calculated with the following:
The
BCNFU value is two for the
chain units in the NaPO
3 glass. It increases to 2.6 for the nbp13 sample. Maximum values of ≥3 are reached for a larger B
2O
3 content until the potential of the PO
4 units to stabilize the BO
4 is exhausted and BO
3 triangles occur. The Na−O distances of the two glass compositions are shown in
Figure S8. A significant change in the Na−O peaks is not observed. The small scattering power of Na, if compared with Zn and the overlap with the O−O distances at 0.25 nm, impede an accurate distance analysis.
Previous diffraction work on Na
2O-B
2O
3-P
2O
5 glasses [
52,
53] did not reach such a large
Qmax, which is needed to resolve different P−O bonds. The structural analysis was made using the Reverse Monte Carlo (RMC) technique, which aimed to elucidate the mixed network-former effect. A main point was the description of the medium-range order which includes the migration pathways for the Na
+ cations. The analysis of the Na−O environments in the model configurations gave total
NNaO values of ~4.5 with very broad distributions of the distinct Na sites ranging from a two- to eightfold coordination. The two distances of 0.152 and 0.156 nm given in [
53] for the P−O
NB and P−O
B bonds are simply calculated from the RMC configurations, but are not resolved in the measuring results and thus cannot be compared with our data.
4.4. The Evolution of the Properties of the Zn Borophosphate Glasses
The figures with the mass densities
ρ of the ZnO-B
2O
3-P
2O
5 glasses in [
22] show a continuous increase with fixed ZnO and increasing B
2O
3 contents. Glass transition temperatures
Tg show similar trends while the expansion coefficients α change in opposite directions. The values of
ρ and
Tg in [
13] show similar trends, although the comparisons are made along constant O/P ratios. It needs to be remembered that the Zn phosphate glasses have been classified as showing anomalous behavior [
40]. The minima of mass density at 50 mol% ZnO [
25,
40,
54] or
Tg values [
13,
54] at ~60 mol% ZnO are characteristic of the binary Zn phosphate glasses. Below, the mass densities that were published for the full range of glass formation in the ZnO-B
2O
3-P
2O
5 system are discussed [
22]. Packing densities are better suited for comparisons whereby the influence of atomic size and mass is widely eliminated. Such comparisons were made for the ZnO-P
2O
5 glasses recently [
27] by using the ionic radii from [
55].
A packing density is the filled volume fraction, assuming the atoms are spheres of known ionic radii. Since the BO
4 tetrahedra have small O−O distances, there is some overlap of the oxygen spheres with an ionic radius of 0.135 nm; to a lesser extent, there is also some overlap for the PO
4 tetrahedra. A correction was made for this overlap. The packing densities of the Zn borophosphate glasses obtained from the mass densities given in [
22] are shown in
Figure 12 as numbers given close to the sample positions in the concentration triangle. The absolute minimum at 50 mol% ZnO shows a packing density of 46.4%. This behavior was attributed to being caused by the network of corner-connected PO
4 and ZnO
4 tetrahedra with all oxygens in bridges (
Figure 8b), a network that fills the space quite inefficiently [
25].
Above, it was shown that the tetrahedral character of the network does not change when B
2O
3 replaces the ZnO while 50 mol% P
2O
5 is fixed. A plateau of ~51% packing density is reached with 10% B
2O
3 (
Figure 12). This increase is due to the exchange of the rather open ZnO
4 unit for the more compact BO
4 unit. There exists a further subtle increase in the packing density up to ~52.5% in the direction of decreasing P
2O
5 contents. This fact is interpreted with the change from P−O−Zn bridges (
Figure 10a) to the first O
NB shared by two Zn (
Figure 10b) and the exchange of PO
4 for BO
4 units. Finally, when only isolated PO
4 units exist, then BO
3 units with O
NB shared by two Zn are also formed (
Figure 10c), and the packing densities still increase. The (ZnO)
x(B
2O
3)
1−x glasses with 0.54 ≤
x ≤ 0.67 [
19] with few BO
4 connected with BO
3 have packing efficiencies of 55% to 53.5%, where the O
NB of the BO
3 are shared by two Zn. For the reachable glass compositions, the BO
3 units of the Zn borate glasses have one or two O
NB.