Next Article in Journal
Fabrication of Low-Emissivity Glass with Antibacterial Properties by Coating Cu/AZO Thin Films
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
Point-Defect Segregation and Space-Charge Potentials at the Σ5(310)[001] Grain Boundary in Ceria
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Pressure-Induced YbFe2O4-Type to Spinel Structural Change of InGaMgO4

1
Institute of Innovative Research, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Yokohama 226-8501, Japan
2
Kanagawa Institute of Industrial Science and Technology, Ebina 243-0435, Japan
3
Department of Applied Chemistry, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Kindai University, Higashiosaka 577-8502, Japan
4
Department of Applied Chemistry, Okayama University of Science, Okayama 700-0005, Japan
5
Departamento de Investigaciones en Polimeros y Materiales, Universidad de Sonora, Hermosillo 83000, Mexico
6
School of Materials and Chemical Technology, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Meguro 152-8552, Japan
7
Department of Materials Science, Graduate School of Engineering, Osaka Metropolitan University, Sakai 599-8531, Japan
8
Department of Physics, Graduate School of Science, Osaka Metropolitan University, Sakai 599-8531, Japan
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Solids 2024, 5(3), 422-433; https://doi.org/10.3390/solids5030028
Submission received: 30 June 2024 / Revised: 6 August 2024 / Accepted: 13 August 2024 / Published: 19 August 2024

Abstract

:
Spinel-type InGaMgO4 with a = 8.56615(3) Å was prepared by treating layered YbFe2O4-type InGaMgO4 at 6 GPa and 1473 K. DFT calculation and Rietveld analysis of synchrotron X-ray powder diffraction data revealed the inverse spinel structure with In3+:Ga3+/Mg2+ = 0.726:0.274 in the tetrahedral site and 0.137:0.863 in the octahedral site. InGaMgO4 spinel is an insulator with an experimental band gap of 2.80 eV, and the attempt at hole doping by post-annealing in a reducing atmosphere to introduce an oxygen defect was unsuccessful. This is the first report of the bulk synthesis of AB2O4 compounds with both YbFe2O4 and spinel polymorphs.

1. Introduction

Transparent conductive oxides (TCOs) find applications in various fields, including flat-panel displays and solar cells. Among them, amorphous indium gallium zinc oxide (a-IGZO) is widely used in smartphones and displays in thin films [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]. a-IGZO allows for low-temperature deposition, enabling the fabrication of complex devices on plastic substrates. However, due to its random structural nature, variations in oxygen binding strength occur, leading to the easy removal of some oxygen. As the free electron density is related to oxygen defects, a-IGZO is electrically unstable. Crystalline IGZO is known to have a layered YbFe2O4-type structure with space group R 3 ¯ m (166). MgIn2O4-x with the other AB2O4 structure, spinel, is also known as a TCO [8,9]. Spinel has a closed packing oxygen sublattice with the ABCABCA sequence of a triangular lattice, while the sequence of oxygen layers in the YbFe2O4 structure is ABABCACABCBCA, as shown in Figure 1 [10]. Divalent A-cation in the normal spinel structure has an oxygen tetrahedral coordination (Td), while trivalent B-cation has an octahedral coordination (Oh). Recently, the synthesis of the polycrystalline spinel phase of IGZO by physical vapor deposition (PVD) on a Ga2ZnO4 (GZO) template layer has been reported [11]. However, no AB2O4 composition having both YbFe2O4 and spinel polymorphs is known in bulk form. Since the spinel phase generally has a higher density, the transformation of YbFe2O4 into spinel structures is expected to occur under high pressure. In this work, we focus on MgInGaO4. Inverse spinel structures of MgIn2O4 (In3+[Mg2+In3+]O4) and MgGa2O4 (Ga3+[Mg2+Ga3+]O4) were reported, while MgIn2-xGaxO4 (0.8 ≤ x ≤ 1.0) has a YbFe2O4-type structure when prepared at ambient pressure [9,12,13]. We first investigated the stable cation distribution of spinel MgInGaO4 by density functional theory (DFT) calculations and Monte Carlo simulation, which indicated that the tetrahedral site was mainly occupied by In3+. Treatment of the YbFe2O4-type phase at 6 GPa and 1473 K resulted in the formation of a spinel phase. Our structural analysis using synchrotron X-ray diffraction (SXRD) data revealed that the resultant spinel phase adopts an inverse-type structure with a cation distribution of In3+:Ga3+/Mg2+ = 0.726:0.274 in the tetrahedral site, whereas the distribution in the octahedral sites was In3+:Ga3+/Mg2+ = 0.137:0.863, consistent with our theoretical investigation. This is the first report of the bulk synthesis of AB2O4 compounds with both YbFe2O4 and spinel polymorphs.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Computational Details

To determine the lowest-energy cation arrangements in the InGaMgO4 system, we developed In-Ga-Mg ternary models using the cluster expansion (CE) method [15,16,17] as implemented in the Cluster Approach to Statistical Mechanics (CASM) software [18]. The ternary model Hamiltonian was expanded as a functional of occupation variable σ as, E σ = E 0 + γ m γ J γ Φ γ , where m γ , J γ and Φ γ represent the multiplicity of inequivalent cluster, effective cluster interactions (ECI) and cluster function, respectively. E o denotes the point energy and γ represents a cluster lattice size. The basis is defined as 1 , σ , σ 2 to construct the cluster function [19]. The lattice Hamiltonian was expanded up to four-site clusters. We employed the linear regression method with the genetic algorithm to fit the ternary Hamiltonian with the first principles of density functional theory (DFT) calculated energies. The final Hamiltonian was optimized to a ~ 8 meV/f.u cross-validation (CV) score. Canonical Monte Carlo simulations based on the DFT-constructed In-Ga-Mg ternary model considering up to 9 × 9 × 9 supercell size were performed. We considered an energy convergency criteria of 10−4 eV to detect phase transitions.
In addition, to model the effect of cation disorder within DFT tractable cell size, we generated special quasi-random structures (SQS) [20], considering a supercell consisting of a maximum of 112 atoms and various cation configurations. Within a supercell, a perfectly random network for the selected shells around a given site was closely generated to create an SQS structure by using the Alloy Theoretic Automated Toolkit (ATAT) [21].
First-principles calculations were performed using DFT [22,23] by employing the projector augmented-wave (PAW) method [24,25] as implemented in the Vienna ab initio simulation package (VASP) [26,27]. We used an energy cutoff of 600 eV and sampled the k-pints according to crystal symmetry. The lowest-energy cation-ordered structures were determined by considering the generalized gradient approximation (GGA) of Perdew, Burke and Ernzerhof (PBE) approximation for the exchange-correlation functionals developed for solids (PBEsol) [28,29]. The Hellmann-Feynman forces were converged to 0.001 eV/Å. We cross-checked our electronic energy bands and optical properties by using the meta-GGA functional r2SCAN [30] as well as the hybrid functional HSE06 [31]. We selected PAW potentials for Mg, In, Ga and O with the electronic configurations 2s22p63s2, 5s24d105p1, 5s24d105p1, 2s22p4, respectively. Additionally, we cross-checked our results, considering other electronic configurations.
To estimate the value of electron effective mass for each structure, we performed a calculation of the band structure considering the multiple symmetry lines and computed the effective masses along the band-structure symmetry lines using the AMSET package [32], which employs the Fourier interpolation of the band structure using BoltzTraP2 [33]. The average effective electron masses are listed in Table 1.

2.2. Experimental

YbFe2O4-type InGaMgO4 was prepared by calcining a stoichiometric mixture of In2O3, Ga2O3 and MgO at atmospheric pressure and 1573 K for 6 days [12]. The obtained powder was packed in Pt capsules, loaded into pyrophyllite cells and then treated at 6 GPa and 1473 K for 30 min using a cubic anvil-type high-pressure apparatus. The powder X-ray diffraction patterns were obtained with a Bruker D8 Advance diffractometer equipped with a Cu Kα radiation source. SXRD data for structural refinements were collected at the BL02B2 beamline of SPring-8 with a wavelength of λ = 0.50061 Å. The Rietveld analysis of SXRD data was conducted using the RIETAN-FP program [34]. Transmission electron microscope (TEM) and electron diffraction (ED) images were obtained with a scanning transmission electron microscope (STEM, JEOL JEM-2800). Optical reflectance measurements were carried out using a U-4100 Hitachi High-Tech Co. ultraviolet–visible (UV–vis) spectrophotometer.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Theoretical Comparative Analysis between the Layered and the Inverse Spinel Phase

The F d 3 ¯ m cubic phase of spinel MgAl2O4-type structure has two types of cation sites: tetrahedral ( T d ) and octahedral ( O h ). In agreement with experimental observations [35], both MgIn2O4 and MgGa2O4 were found to be crystallized in the inverse spinel P 4 1 22 structure (see Figure 2a) with In 1 . 0 T d Mg 1 . 0 In 1 . 0 O h O 4 and Ga 1 . 0 T d Mg 1 . 0 Ga 1 . 0 O h O 4 configurations, respectively. As Mg2+ ions exhibit a strong tendency to occupy the octahedral site, we generated MgInGaO4 configurations by distributing the cations in both the T d and O h sub-lattices. The ground state structure predicted by DFT + CE within eight formula units of cell size has inverse spinel P 4 3 22 symmetry with In 1 . 0 T d Mg 1 . 0 Ga 1 . 0 O h O 4 configuration, with In3+ ions showing a higher tendency to occupy the four-fold oxygen-coordinated T d sites compared to the six-fold oxygen coordination ( O h ) sites. The CE model was constructed by fitting the In-Ga-Mg ternary Hamiltonian with DFT calculated energies of 370 configurations, resulting in a CV score of ~8 meV/f.u. The calculated formation energies and estimated ECI values are shown in Figure 2. The formation energy of the InGaMgO4 composition was calculated with respect to the end members, MgIn2O4 and MgGa2O4 stable compositions, as
f E = E InGaMnO 4 1 2 E MgIn 2 O 4 1 2 E MgGa 2 O 4
where E InGaMnO 4 , E MgIn 2 O 4 and E MgGa 2 O 4 denote the corresponding DFT calculated internal energies. The formation energy of the lowest-energy cation-ordered inverse spinel structure is ~0.018 eV/oxygen, which agrees with experimental observations [9] that the inverse spinel phase is less likely to crystallize under ambient conditions. Canonical MC simulations do not clearly indicate any temperature-induced cation order–disorder transition; rather, at 305 K, stabilize structures having In 0 . 74 Ga 0 . 17 Mg 0 . 09 T d In 0 . 26 Ga 0 . 82 Mg 0 . 92 O h O 4 cation configurations. Interestingly, the lowest-energy SQS model has a In 1 . 0 T d Mg 1 . 0 Ga 1 . 0 O h O 4 configuration. Therefore, the key observations are the following: (1) while In3+ ions tend to form at the T d sites, the Mg2+ and Ga3+ ions occupy the O h sites with anti-site disorder, which is in line with the estimated ECI values of binary and ternary clusters; (2) the inverse spinel phase is less likely to form at ambient conditions in contrast to the parent systems; and (3) at finite temperatures, the cations are less likely to form a long-range order. These predictions were experimentally confirmed, as discussed later. In fact, T. Moriga et al. [9] synthesized the YbFe2O4-type layered phase of InGaMgO4 at ambient conditions. By studying the energies of 200 ordered cation structures, where cations are distributed within the trigonal bipyramidal and octahedral sites of the layered phase, the lowest-energy cation-ordered structure was found to have P 2 ¯ m symmetry and was 0.030 eV/oxygen lower in energy compared to the inverse spinel phase. The calculated formation energy is ~−0.012 eV/oxygen. In the layered phase, while the In3+ ions sit within an oxygen octahedral environment, the Mg2+ and Ga3+ occupy the five-fold coordinated trigonal bipyramid sites. A phase transition from the layered to inverse spinel structure is expected to take place at around ~9.5 GPa of applied pressure, accompanied by a 2% volume reduction.
The band structures of the layered and inverse spinel phases of InGaMgO4 calculated using HSE functionals, as shown in Figure 3, show an indirect nature of the band gap with values of 3.77 eV ( E Γ ) and 3.58 eV ( X Γ ), respectively, like the parent compounds MgIn2O4 and MgGa2O4. The various band structures corresponding to the inverse spinel phase of MgInxGa2-xO4 compositions display striking similarities across a range of functionalities. These sets of common behavioral patterns are as follows: (1) the valence bands are dominated by O 2p states forming valence band maxima (VBM) at the X 0 , 1 2 , 0 point; (2) valence bands near Fermi energy are flat with localized oxygen 2p bonding character and large hole effective mass; (3) the conduction bands, on the other hand, are primarily composed of post-transition metal 5s states having a strong dispersion and low electron effective mass, originating from the strong antibonding interaction between the cation 5s and oxygen 2p states, a common feature in the post-transition metal-based TCOs such as In2O3, SnO2 and Ga2O3; and (4) a direct band gap at the Γ point lies close to an indirect band gap between the X and Γ points. The calculated band gaps ( E g ) and mean effective electron masses ( m e * ) for MgInxGa2-xO4 compositions using various exchange-correlation functionals are listed in Table 1. The calculated band gaps at the HSE level for MgIn2O4 and MgGa2O4 compositions, 3.04 eV and 4.71 eV, respectively, are in close agreement with previous reports [8,9]. The estimated values of electron mean effective masses and reduced effective masses indicate high electron mobility and are comparable to those of known post-transition metal-based TCOs [35,36]. The direct band-to-band absorption spectrum calculated by employing the hybrid HSE06 functional is shown in Figure 3 for both the layered and inverse spinel phases of InGaMgO4. In the case of the MgIn2O4 parent system, the absorption coefficient reaches a value of 104 cm−1 at an energy of 3.43 eV, which is close to the optical band gap of 3.4 eV reported for MgIn2O4−x [8,9]. The theoretically estimated optical band gap of MgGa2O4 at the level of HSE06, ~4.9 eV, is also in good agreement with the experiment. Therefore, according to the HSE06 results, an optical band gap of ~3.8 eV is predicted to be observed for InGaMgO4. The optical band gap of the layered phase is expected to be slightly higher than that of the inverse spinel phase. We calculated the electronic structures for multiple cation configurations with and without anti-site disorder energetically lying within 50 meV above the energy hull and observed that the value of the indirect band gap varies within 0.1 eV energy around that of the lowest-energy cation-ordered phase (see Table 1) and hence does not significantly depend on the cation ordering or anti-site disorder. Therefore, even if a situation of the formation of cation-disordered states arises at a finite temperature, as observed in the MC simulations, the electronic structure and optical properties of the system are least likely to register any significant alteration.
Next, to develop insights into the probability of oxygen formation and hence its impact on the electronic and optical properties of InGaMnO4−x compositions, we calculated oxygen vacancy formation energy as a function of oxygen pressure and temperature by using the following equation:
E f = E V 0 E 0 + μ 0 + q E f
Here, E V 0 and E 0 denote the total energies with and without an oxygen vacancy in a charge state of q, respectively. The oxygen chemical potential and the electronic chemical potential are denoted as μ 0 and E f , respectively. The chemical potential of oxygen as a function of oxygen pressure (p) and temperature (T) was estimated from the following equation:
μ 0 p , T = μ 0 p 0 , T 0 + μ 0 p 1 , T + 1 2 k B T ln p p 1
Here, μ 0 p 0 , T 0 and μ 0 p 1 , T represent oxygen chemical potential at zero pressure ( p 0   = 0), zero temperature ( T 0 = 0 K) and at p 1 = 1 atm pressure and finite temperature ( T ), respectively. The value of the former parameter was estimated from the DFT calculations, μ 0 p 0 , T 0 = 1 2 E O 2 , where E O 2 denotes the total energy of an oxygen molecule. The second term, μ 0 p 1 , T , was obtained from the experimental data [37]. We estimated the formation energy of a charged (2+) vacancy by performing a total energy calculation in a charge-neutralized cell using a jellium background. The energy shift associated with the jellium neutralization was adjusted by using the total energy of a positively charged perfect crystal. In the inverse spinel structure, each oxygen is connected to one T d and three O h sites. Therefore, a 3D distribution of oxygen vacancies is expected. The formation of charged vacancies is ( V O · · ) ~3.7 eV lower in energy compared to that of neutral vacancies ( V O × ). At the oxidation limit and 0 K, the formation energy of V O · · is ~0.23 eV, indicating a high probability of oxygen vacancy formation similar to the parent system MgIn2O4 [8,9]. The calculated formation energies at a finite temperature and oxygen pressure are given in Figure 4a. In the layered structure, oxygen vacancies can form at the octahedral and trigonal bipyramid layers. Our results show that the charged V O · · vacancies exhibit a high tendency of becoming accumulated in the 2D In 1 - δ 1 - δ 2 Ga δ 1 Mg δ 2 O layer (values of δ 1 and δ 2 are negligibly small), as the formation energy of V O · · in the trigonal bipyramid layer is ~1.2 eV higher in energy compared to that in the octahedral layer. At the oxidation limit and 0 K, the formation of V O · · in the layered phase is ~0.37 eV lower in energy compared to that in the inverse spinel phase. The calculated formation energies at a finite temperature and oxygen pressure are given in Figure 4b. The pressure-induced phase transition can be accompanied by a change in the spatial distribution of oxygen vacancies from 2D 3D. Interestingly, the charged V O · · vacancy formation was found to have a considerable impact on the electronic structure of InGaMgO4, as depicted in Figure 4c. An almost linear decrease in the indirect and direct band gap with the increase in oxygen defects has been observed for the inverse spinel phase. Moreover, a similar trend has also been observed in the case of charged cation defects (see Figure 4d), indicating that the optical properties are expected to be influenced by the cation or oxygen deficiencies.

3.2. Experimental Investigations of the Structural Transition

Figure 5 shows the result of the Rietveld analysis of the SXRD data of YbFe2O4-type InGaMgO4. The refined crystallographic parameters are summarized in Table 2. The refinement indicates the occupations of In in the octahedral sites and Ga/Mg in the trigonal pyramid sites, consistent with the previous report [10]. The site preference is governed by the ionic size rather than the valence of the cations. This phase was further investigated by TEM. Figure 6 shows the TEM image, ED and nano-beam diffraction (NBD) patterns. Twin boundaries, denoted as TB, are observed. NBD reveals that the c-axis is coherent, while the a- and b- axes are inversed at TB.
The SXRD patterns of high-pressure processed InGaMgO4 shown in Figure 7 were indexed, assuming a cubic unit cell with a ~8.56 Å indicating the formation of the spinel phase. The calculated density of 5.77 g/cm3 is higher than that of the YbFe2O4-type phase, 5.61 g/cm3, in accordance with the pressure-induced phase transition. Since the DFT calculation indicated the structure with In in the Td site and Mg/Ga in the Oh site was energetically stable and Monte Carlo simulation also showed the tendency of In in the Td site and 1:1 mixing of Mg and Ga, the Rietveld analysis was performed assuming the presence of Mg/Ga in the 1:1 ratio both in the Td and Oh sites. It should be noted that the cation occupancies cannot be freely refined in this case, and such a constraint must be applied. The refinement gave reasonable reliability factors of RWP = 7.960% and RI = 2.648%. The refined crystal structure is shown as the inset of Figure 7, with the crystallographic parameters summarized in Table 3. The Td site is predominantly occupied by In3+, with a compositional ratio of In3+:Ga3+/Mg2+ = 0.726:0.274, indicative of the inverse spinel structure as anticipated by DFT calculations and Monte Carlo simulations, while the occupancy factors of the Oh site are In3+:Ga3+/Mg2+ = 0.137:0.863. The refined u parameter for the oxygen position (u, u, u), 0.3828, is close to the ideal value u = 0.375.
Figure 8a shows the diffuse reflectance spectrum of the spinel phase. The absorption edge is around 410 nm, corresponding to the band gap of 3.0 eV. To further accurately determine the band gap, the diffuse reflectance data were converted using the Kubelka–Munk function and the Tauc plot was made in Figure 8b using the following Tauc equation:
h ν F R 1 / n = A h ν E g ,
where F(R) is the Kubelka–Munk function, h is Planck’s constant, A is a proportionality constant, ν is the frequency of light and Eg is the band gap energy. Based on the results of the band structure from DFT calculations, direct transitions (indirect transitions) were assumed, with n = 2. The band gap was determined by locating the intersection of the linear region and the baseline. The estimated band gap for the spinel InGaMgO4 is 2.80 eV, close to the calculated value employing r2SCAN, but is considerably smaller than the HSE06 value (3.58 eV) and the experimental values reported for MgIn2O4 (3.45 eV) and MgGa2O4 (4.95 eV) [8,9]. The origin of the smaller band gap is not clear at this stage, but a small amount of cation deficiency under the detection limit of the Rietveld analysis might affect the band gap.
The electrical resistance of spinel InGaMgO4 was above the range of our measurement system, indicating the sample is highly insulating. The attempt at hole doping by inducing oxygen vacancy by post-annealing in 5% H2 gas at 723 K as performed for MgIn2O4 and MgGa2O4 was unsuccessful. No change in the lattice constant or the electrical resistivity was observed.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, we have successfully obtained the spinel-type InGaMgO4 phase by treating the layered YbFe2O4-type phase at 6 GPa and 1473 K. The formation of an inverse spinel structure with In3+:Ga3+/Mg2+ = 0.726:0.274 in the Td and In3+:Ga3+/Mg2+ = 0.137:0.863 in the Oh sites was confirmed by a comprehensive DFT calculation, Monte Carlo simulation and the Rietveld analysis of SXRD patterns. The spinel phase is an insulator with an experimental band gap of 2.80 eV. The attempt at hole-doping by introducing oxygen deficiency was not successful. This is the first report of the bulk synthesis of AB2O4 compounds with both YbFe2O4 and spinel polymorphs.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, N.K., V.E.A.-M. and M.A.; sample preparation, T.K., F.C., F.B.B., H.T. and I.Y.; theoretical calculations, H.D.; structural analysis, K.O., H.I., Y.K. (Yoshiki Kubota), S.M. and M.A.; TEM observations, Y.K. (Yoshihiro Kusano); optical measurement: T.K., K.S. and S.I.; writing—original draft preparation, T.K. and H.D.; writing—review and editing, M.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Numbers JP19H05625 and JP24H00374, Design and Engineering by Joint Inverse Innovation for Materials Architecture, MEXT and Collaborative Research Project of Laboratory for Materials and Structures, Institute of Innovative Research, Tokyo Institute of Technology.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors on request.

Acknowledgments

The synchrotron-radiation experiments were performed at SPring-8 with the approval of the Japan Synchrotron Radiation Research Institute (2022A1250).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Petti, L.; Münzenrieder, N.; Vogt, C.; Faber, H.; Büthe, L.; Cantarella, G.; Bottacchi, F.; Anthopoulos, T.D.; Tröster, G. Metal oxide semiconductor thin-film transistors for flexible electronics. Appl. Phys. Rev. 2016, 3, 021303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kamiya, T.; Nomura, K.; Hosono, H. Subgap states, doping and defect formation energies in amorphous oxide semiconductor a-InGaZnO4 studied by density functional theory. Phys. Status Solidi A 2010, 207, 1698–1703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Arai, T.; Sasaoka, T. 49.1: Invited Paper: Emergent Oxide TFT Technologies for Next-Generation AM-OLED Displays. SID Symp. Dig. Tech. Pap. 2011, 42, 710–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kataoka, Y.; Imai, H.; Nakata, Y.; Daitoh, T.; Kimura, T.M.N.; Nakano, T.; Mizuno, Y.; Oketani, T.; Takahashi, M.; Tsubuku, M.; et al. 56.1: Development of IGZO-TFT and Creation of New Devices Using IGZO-TFT. SID Symp. Dig. Tech. Pap. 2013, 44, 771–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Nag, M.; Rockele, M.; Steudel, S.; Chasin, A.; Myny, K.; Bhoolokam, A.; Willegems, M.; Smout, S.; Vicca, P.; Ameys, M.; et al. Novel back-channel-etch process flow based a-IGZO TFTs for circuit and display applications on PEN foil. J. Soc. Inf. Disp. 2013, 21, 369–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Nag, M.; Roose, F.D.; Myny, K.; Steudel, S.; Genoe, J.; Groeseneken, G.; Heremans, P. Characteristics improvement of top-gate self-aligned amorphous indium gallium zinc oxide thin-film transistors using a dual-gate control. J. Soc. Inf. Disp. 2017, 25, 349–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hiblot, G.; Rassoul, N.; Teugels, L.; Devriendt, K.; Chasin, A.V.; van Setten, M.; Belmonte, A.; Delhougne, R.; Kar, G.S. Process- Induced Charging Damage in IGZO nTFTs. In Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE International Reliability Physics Symposium (IRPS), Monterey, CA, USA, 21–25 March 2021. [Google Scholar]
  8. Ueda, N.; Omata, T.; Hikuma, N.; Ueda, K.; Mizoguchi, H.; Hashimoto, T.; Kawazoe, H. New oxide phase with wide band gap and high electroconductivity, MgIn2O4. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1992, 61, 1954–1955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Moriga, T.; Sakamoto, T.; Sato, Y.; Khalid, A.H.; Suenari, R.; Nakabayashi, I. Crystal Structures and Electrical and Optical Properties of MgIn2−xGaxO4 Solid Solutions. J. Solid State Chem. 1999, 142, 206–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kato, K.; Kawada, I.; Kimizuka, N.; Katsura, T. Die Kristallstruktur von YbFe2O4. Z. Kristallogr. 1975, 141, 314–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Dekkers, H.F.W.; van Setten, M.J.; Belmonte, A.; Chasin, A.V.; Subhechha, S.; Rassoul, N.; Glushkova, A.V.; Delhougne, R.; Sankar Kar, G. Deposition, Characterization, and Performance of Spinel InGaZnO4. ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. 2022, 4, 1238–1249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kimizuka, N.; Mohri, T. Spinel-, YbFe2O4- and Yb2Fe3O7-types of structures for compounds in the In2O3-and Sc2O3-A2O3-BO systems [A:Fe, Ga or Al, B:Mg, Mn, Fe, Ni, Cu or Zn] at temperatures over 1000 °C. J. Solid State Chem. 1985, 60, 382–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Pilania, G.; Kocevski, V.; Valdez, J.A.; Kreller, C.R.; Uberuaga, B.P. Prediction of structure and cation ordering in an ordered normal-inverse double spinel. Commun. Mater. 2020, 1, 84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Momma, K.; Izumi, F. VESTA 3 for three-dimensional visualization of crystal, volumetric and morphology data. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2011, 44, 1272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Thomas, J.C.; Van der Ven, A. Finite-Temperature Properties of Strongly Anharmonic and Mechanically Unstable Crystal Phases from First Principles. Phys. Rev. B 2013, 88, 214111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Puchala, B.; Van der Ven, A. Thermodynamics of the Zr-O System from First-Principles Calculations. Phys. Rev. B 2013, 88, 094108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Van der Ven, J.; Thomas, J.C.; Xu, Q.; Bhattacharya, J. Linking the Electronic Structure of Solids to Their Thermodynamic and Kinetic Properties. Math. Comput. Simulat. 2010, 80, 1393–1410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. CASM, v0.3.dev-269-gd07b42. Available online: https://Github.Com/Prisms-Center/CASMcode (accessed on 6 November 2019).
  19. Das, H.; Urban, A.; Huang, W.; Ceder, G. First-Principles Simulation of the (Li−Ni−Vacancy)O Phase Diagram and Its Relevance for the Surface Phases in Ni-Rich Li-Ion Cathode Materials. Chem. Mater. 2017, 29, 7840–7851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zunger, A.; Wei, S.-H.; Ferreira, L.G.; Bernard, J.E. Special quasirandom structures. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1990, 65, 353–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. van de Walle, A.; Asta, M.; Ceder, G. The alloy theoretic automated toolkit: A user guide. CALPHAD: Comput. Coupling Phase Diagr. Thermochem. 2002, 26, 539–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Hohenberg, P.; Kohn, W. Inhomogeneous electron gas. Phys. Rev. 1964, 136, B864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kohn, W.; Sham, L.J. Self-consistent equations including exchange and correlation effects. Phys. Rev. 1965, 140, A1133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Blöchl, P.E. Projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 1994, 50, 17953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Kresse, G.; Joubert, D. From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 1999, 59, 1758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kresse, G.; Furthmüller, J. Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set. Comput. Mater. Sci. 1996, 6, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kresse, G.; Furthmüller, J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B 1996, 54, 11169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Perdew, J.P.; Burke, K.; Ernzerhof, M. Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996, 77, 3865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Perdew, J.P.; Ruzsinszky, A.; Csonka, G.I.; Vydrov, O.A.; Scuseria, G.E.; Constantin, L.A.; Zhou, X.; Burke, K. Restoring the density-gradient expansion for exchange in solids and surfaces. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2008, 100, 136406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Furness, J.W.; Kaplan, A.D.; Ning, J.; Perdew, J.P.; Sun, J. Accurate and Numerically Efficient r2SCAN Meta-Generalized Gradient Approximation. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2020, 11, 8208–8215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Krukau, A.V.; Vydrov, O.A.; Izmaylov, A.F.; Scuseria, G.E. Influence of the exchange screening parameter on the performance of screened hybrid functionals. J. Chem. Phys. 2006, 125, 224106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Ganose, A.M.; Park, J.; Faghaninia, A.; Woods-Robinson, R.; Persson, K.A.; Jain, A. Efficient calculation of carrier scattering rates from first principles. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 2222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Madsen, G.K.H.; Carrete, J.; Verstraete, M.J. BoltzTraP2, a program for interpolating band structures and calculating semi-classical transport coefficients. Comput. Phys. Commun. 2018, 231, 140–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Izumi, F.; Momma, K. Three-Dimensional Visualization in Powder Diffraction. Solid State Phenom. 2007, 130, 15–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Feneberg, M.; Nixdorf, J.; Lidig, C.; Goldhahn, R.; Galazka, Z.; Bierwagen, O.; Speck, J.S. Many-electron effects on the dielectric function of cubic In2O3: Effective electron mass, band nonparabolicity, band gap renormalization, and Burstein-Moss shift. Phys. Rev. B 2016, 93, 045203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Serin, T.; Yildiz, A.; Serin, N.; Yildirim, N.; Özyurt, F.; Kasap, M. Electron–Electron Interactions in Sb-Doped SnO2 Thin Films. J. Electron. Mater. 2010, 39, 1152–1158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. JANAF Thermochemical Tables [Electronic Resource]/D.R. Stull and H. Prophet, Project Directors (National Library of Australia). Available online: https://catalogue.nla.gov.au/Record/4614045 (accessed on 25 June 2024).
Figure 1. Crystal structures of YbFe2O4 and spinel types AB2O4 drawn using VESTA 3 software [14].
Figure 1. Crystal structures of YbFe2O4 and spinel types AB2O4 drawn using VESTA 3 software [14].
Solids 05 00028 g001
Figure 2. DFT-calculated and cluster-expanded formation energies of the inverse spinel phase of MgInGaO4 composition as a function of In3+ concentration (x). (a) The calculated energies of the spinel and inverse spinel phases of the end members MgGa2O4 and MgIn2O4 are denoted as green solid squares and red circles, respectively. The special quasi-random structures (SQS) models MSQS1, MSQS2 and MSQS3 correspond to In 0 . 5 Ga 0 . 5 T d Mg 1 . 0 In 0 . 5 Ga 0 . 5 O h O 4 , In 0 . 5 Ga 0 . 25 Mg 0 . 25 T d Mg 0 . 75 In 0 . 5 Ga 0 . 75 O h O 4 and In 1 . 0 T d Mg 1 . 0 Ga 1 . 0 O h O 4 configurations, where T d and O h denote tetrahedral (multiplicity = 8) and octahedra (multiplicity = 16) sites, respectively. (b) Estimated values of effective cluster interactions (ECI) for two sites (top panel), three sites (middle panel) and four sites (bottom panel) clusters.
Figure 2. DFT-calculated and cluster-expanded formation energies of the inverse spinel phase of MgInGaO4 composition as a function of In3+ concentration (x). (a) The calculated energies of the spinel and inverse spinel phases of the end members MgGa2O4 and MgIn2O4 are denoted as green solid squares and red circles, respectively. The special quasi-random structures (SQS) models MSQS1, MSQS2 and MSQS3 correspond to In 0 . 5 Ga 0 . 5 T d Mg 1 . 0 In 0 . 5 Ga 0 . 5 O h O 4 , In 0 . 5 Ga 0 . 25 Mg 0 . 25 T d Mg 0 . 75 In 0 . 5 Ga 0 . 75 O h O 4 and In 1 . 0 T d Mg 1 . 0 Ga 1 . 0 O h O 4 configurations, where T d and O h denote tetrahedral (multiplicity = 8) and octahedra (multiplicity = 16) sites, respectively. (b) Estimated values of effective cluster interactions (ECI) for two sites (top panel), three sites (middle panel) and four sites (bottom panel) clusters.
Solids 05 00028 g002
Figure 3. (a) Calculated band structure (left panel) and optical absorption (right panel) for the layered phase of InGaMnO4, corresponding to the lowest-energy cation-ordered structure using hybrid potential. (b) Calculated band structure (left panel) and optical absorption (right panel) for the inverse spinel phase of InGaMnO4, corresponding to the lowest-energy cation-ordered structure using hybrid potential. The gray band in (b) represents the visible spectrum of light.
Figure 3. (a) Calculated band structure (left panel) and optical absorption (right panel) for the layered phase of InGaMnO4, corresponding to the lowest-energy cation-ordered structure using hybrid potential. (b) Calculated band structure (left panel) and optical absorption (right panel) for the inverse spinel phase of InGaMnO4, corresponding to the lowest-energy cation-ordered structure using hybrid potential. The gray band in (b) represents the visible spectrum of light.
Solids 05 00028 g003
Figure 4. Calculated formation energies ( E f ) of charged oxygen vacancy V O · · as a function of oxygen partial pressure and temperature for the inverse spinel (a) and layered (b) phases of InGaMgO4. The E f was set at the valence band maximum. (c) Calculated energy band gap (Eg) of the inverse spinel phase of InGaMgO4-x as a function of oxygen defect concentration x at the level of HSE06. (d) Estimated band gap values corresponding to the crystals with charged cation and oxygen defects with 0.125 concentration at the level of HSE06. The dashed line denotes the band gap value for the perfect crystal.
Figure 4. Calculated formation energies ( E f ) of charged oxygen vacancy V O · · as a function of oxygen partial pressure and temperature for the inverse spinel (a) and layered (b) phases of InGaMgO4. The E f was set at the valence band maximum. (c) Calculated energy band gap (Eg) of the inverse spinel phase of InGaMgO4-x as a function of oxygen defect concentration x at the level of HSE06. (d) Estimated band gap values corresponding to the crystals with charged cation and oxygen defects with 0.125 concentration at the level of HSE06. The dashed line denotes the band gap value for the perfect crystal.
Solids 05 00028 g004
Figure 5. Observed (red points), calculated (green line) and difference (blue line) patterns of YbFe2O4-type InGaMgO4 from the result of the Rietveld analysis of the SXRD data at room temperature (λ = 0.500606 Å). The green tick marks indicate the positions of Bragg reflections of YbFe2O4-type InGaMgO4, In2O3 and MgGa2O4 phases from top to bottom. The reliability factors of the refinement were RWP = 9.62% and RI = 1.67%. The weight fractions of the impurity of In2O3 and MgGa2O4 phases were estimated to be 0.3 and 1.7 wt%, respectively. The crystal structure of YbFe2O4-type InGaMgO4 was visualized using VESTA 3 software [14].
Figure 5. Observed (red points), calculated (green line) and difference (blue line) patterns of YbFe2O4-type InGaMgO4 from the result of the Rietveld analysis of the SXRD data at room temperature (λ = 0.500606 Å). The green tick marks indicate the positions of Bragg reflections of YbFe2O4-type InGaMgO4, In2O3 and MgGa2O4 phases from top to bottom. The reliability factors of the refinement were RWP = 9.62% and RI = 1.67%. The weight fractions of the impurity of In2O3 and MgGa2O4 phases were estimated to be 0.3 and 1.7 wt%, respectively. The crystal structure of YbFe2O4-type InGaMgO4 was visualized using VESTA 3 software [14].
Solids 05 00028 g005
Figure 6. TEM image, ED and NBD patterns of YbFe2O4-type InGaMgO4. a and b are the ED images of the corresponding area in the main panel. c–f are the NBD patterns of the corresponding area in the main panel.
Figure 6. TEM image, ED and NBD patterns of YbFe2O4-type InGaMgO4. a and b are the ED images of the corresponding area in the main panel. c–f are the NBD patterns of the corresponding area in the main panel.
Solids 05 00028 g006
Figure 7. Observed (red points), calculated (green line) and difference (blue line) patterns of spinel InGaMgO4 from the result of the Rietveld analysis of the SXRD data at room temperature (λ = 0.500606 Å). The tick marks correspond to the positions of Bragg reflections of the InGaMgO4 spinel and In2O3 phases from top to bottom. The reliability factors of the refinement were RWP = 7.960% and RI = 2.648%. The weight fraction of the impurity of In2O3 was estimated to be 3.3 wt%. The crystal structure of the InGaMgO4 spinel phase was visualized using VESTA 3 software [14].
Figure 7. Observed (red points), calculated (green line) and difference (blue line) patterns of spinel InGaMgO4 from the result of the Rietveld analysis of the SXRD data at room temperature (λ = 0.500606 Å). The tick marks correspond to the positions of Bragg reflections of the InGaMgO4 spinel and In2O3 phases from top to bottom. The reliability factors of the refinement were RWP = 7.960% and RI = 2.648%. The weight fraction of the impurity of In2O3 was estimated to be 3.3 wt%. The crystal structure of the InGaMgO4 spinel phase was visualized using VESTA 3 software [14].
Solids 05 00028 g007
Figure 8. (a) The diffuse reflectance spectrum and (b) Tauc plots of spinel phase.
Figure 8. (a) The diffuse reflectance spectrum and (b) Tauc plots of spinel phase.
Solids 05 00028 g008
Table 1. Estimated values of electronic band gap ( E g ) and mean effective electron mass ( m e * ) for MgInxGa2-xO4 compositions at levels of GGA PBEsol, Meta-GGA r2SCAN and hybrid functional HSE06. The values of the direct band gap are given within parenthesis.
Table 1. Estimated values of electronic band gap ( E g ) and mean effective electron mass ( m e * ) for MgInxGa2-xO4 compositions at levels of GGA PBEsol, Meta-GGA r2SCAN and hybrid functional HSE06. The values of the direct band gap are given within parenthesis.
Exchange-Correlation FunctionalMgIn2O4MgGa2O4InGaMgO4 (IS)InGaMgO4 (L)
E g (eV) E g (eV) E g (eV) E g (eV)
PBEsol1.45 (1.48)2.88 (3.01)1.90 (2.05)2.10 (2.14)
r2SCAN2.09 (2.11)3.62 (3.75)2.57 (2.72)2.77 (2.80)
HSE063.04 (3.07)4.71 (4.85)3.58 (3.72)3.77 (3.83)
Exchange-Correlation FunctionalMgIn2O4MgGa2O4InGaMgO4 (IS)InGaMgO4 (L)
m e * m e * m e * m e *
PBEsol0.3240.4070.3460.285
r2SCAN0.3910.4650.4230.305
HSE060.1600.1800.1700.206
Table 2. Refined structural parameters for YbFe2O4-type InGaMgO4 from SXRD data at room temperature.
Table 2. Refined structural parameters for YbFe2O4-type InGaMgO4 from SXRD data at room temperature.
AtomsSitegxyzUiso2
In3a0.964 (2)0000.0046 (2)
Ga0.018
Mg0.018
In6c0.034 (3)000.21671 (3)0.0047 (3)
Ga0.483
Mg0.483
O6c1000.1289 (1)0.011 (1)
O6c1000.2915 (1)0.005 (1)
Space group R 3 ¯ m (No.166), a = 3.30397(2) Å, c = 25.8047(2) Å. The occupation factors g of Mg and Ga are constrained to have identical values for the refinement. The sum of occupation factors for each distinct site is constrained to be unity.
Table 3. Refined structural parameters for high-pressure processed InGaMgO4 spinel from SXRD data at room temperature.
Table 3. Refined structural parameters for high-pressure processed InGaMgO4 spinel from SXRD data at room temperature.
AtomsSitegxyzU2
In8a0.726 (3)0000.0058 (2)
Ga0.137
Mg0.137
In16d0.1370.6250.6250.6250.0071 (2)
Ga0.432
Mg0.432
O32e10.3828 (2)0.38280.38280.0118 (6)
Space group Fd-3m (No. 227), a = 8.56615(3) Å. The occupation factors g of Mg and Ga are constrained to have identical values for the refinement. The sum of occupation factors is constrained to be unity for each distinct site and maintain the chemical composition of InGaMgO4.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Koike, T.; Das, H.; Oka, K.; Kusano, Y.; Cubillas, F.; Bojorqez, F.B.; Alvarez-Montano, V.E.; Ito, S.; Shigematsu, K.; Togano, H.; et al. Pressure-Induced YbFe2O4-Type to Spinel Structural Change of InGaMgO4. Solids 2024, 5, 422-433. https://doi.org/10.3390/solids5030028

AMA Style

Koike T, Das H, Oka K, Kusano Y, Cubillas F, Bojorqez FB, Alvarez-Montano VE, Ito S, Shigematsu K, Togano H, et al. Pressure-Induced YbFe2O4-Type to Spinel Structural Change of InGaMgO4. Solids. 2024; 5(3):422-433. https://doi.org/10.3390/solids5030028

Chicago/Turabian Style

Koike, Takehiro, Hena Das, Kengo Oka, Yoshihiro Kusano, Fernando Cubillas, Francisco Brown Bojorqez, Victor Emmanuel Alvarez-Montano, Shigekazu Ito, Kei Shigematsu, Hayato Togano, and et al. 2024. "Pressure-Induced YbFe2O4-Type to Spinel Structural Change of InGaMgO4" Solids 5, no. 3: 422-433. https://doi.org/10.3390/solids5030028

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop