Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
Genome-Wide Identification of the PYL Gene Family in Chenopodium quinoa: From Genes to Protein 3D Structure Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
Chemistry of Hydrogen Peroxide Formation and Elimination in Mammalian Cells, and Its Role in Various Pathologies
Previous Article in Special Issue
Response of Yam (Dioscorea alata) to the Application of Rhizophagus irregularis and Potassium Silicate under Salinity Stress
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Stresses
Volume 2
Issue 3
10.3390/stresses2030020
stresses-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Highly Salt-Tolerant Bacterium Brevibacterium sediminis Promotes the Growth of Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Seedlings

by
Mahmud-Ur-Rahman
1,2,
Iftekhar Bin Naser
1,2,
Nur Uddin Mahmud
1,
Aniruddha Sarker
3,
M. Nazmul Hoque
4 and
Tofazzal Islam
2,*
1
Institute of Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Agricultural University, Gazipur 1706, Bangladesh
2
Department of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, BRAC University, Dhaka 1213, Bangladesh
3
School of Applied Biosciences, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41566, Korea
4
Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Reproductive Health, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Agricultural University (BSMRAU), Gazipur 1706, Bangladesh
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Stresses 2022, 2(3), 275-289; https://doi.org/10.3390/stresses2030020
Submission received: 2 June 2022 / Revised: 7 July 2022 / Accepted: 20 July 2022 / Published: 25 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Physiological and Molecular Mechanisms of Plant Stress Tolerance)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Soil salinity has emerged as a serious issue for food security due to global climate change. It is estimated that currently about 62 million hectares or 20 percent of the world’s irrigated land is affected by salinity. Salinity is a serious problem in the coastal areas of Bangladesh. Isolation of salt-tolerant plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) and applying them as bioinoculants in crop plants are considered promising and effective biotechnological approaches to combat soil salinity. This study aimed to screen salt-tolerant PGPB from the root, leaf, and rhizospheric soils of rice plants collected from salt-affected coastal areas including Chattogram, Noakhali, Lakshmipur, and Cox’s Bazar districts of Bangladesh and evaluated their performances on the seedling growth of rice. Out of forty-one salinity-tolerant bacterial isolates screened, Brevibacterium sediminis showed salinity tolerance up to 12% NaCl (w/v). In vitro bioassay revealed that B. sediminis promoted the seedling growth of rice cv. BRRI dhan29 (salinity susceptible) and BINAdhan-10 (salinity tolerant), and the growth-promoting effects were higher in BINAdhan-10. This study for the first time identified B. sediminis strain IBGE3C as a salt-tolerant PGPB from a widely cultivated rice variety, BRRI dhan28 in the Lakshmipur district of Bangladesh. Our results suggest that salt-tolerant PGPB isolated from the root, leaf, and rhizospheric soil of rice plants could be used as a low cost and environmentally friendly option for overcoming the detrimental effects of salt stress on rice plants in the southern coastal regions of Bangladesh. However, further studies are needed for assessing the efficacy of B. sediminis on enhancement of salinity tolerance, and growth and yield of rice under salinity stressed conditions.

1. Introduction

Many crop plants are sensitive to the high salt concentration in soils that inhibits their growth and productivity [1]. Salinity is a serious environmental hazard for plants and it significantly affects the agricultural system throughout the world [2]. Moreover, the situation is getting worse day by day because of the global tidal surge in coastal regions due to global climate change [3]. Soil salinity is a prominent threat to food security [4], mostly in the developing countries of South and Southeast Asia where the major crops are rice (Oryza sativa L.) and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) [5]. The coastal regions are occupied 20% of the total land along with covering 30% of the total cultivable land in Bangladesh [6]. However, scientists are working to cope with the problems of salinity and their strategies include resource management and developing better salt-tolerant cultivars including transgenics [7]. Since all of these strategies are lengthy and cost-intensive [8,9,10], there is a need for research on developing a novel, sustainable, and cost-effective approach. In this regard, the role of microorganisms, especially plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB), is a very important for enhancing salinity stress tolerance in crop plants [11].
Water and soil resources are the main aspects of agricultural practices and their impacts are vital [12], but the 21st century starts with the problems of the global water scarcity and salinization of soil and water [13]. The current world is struggling to establish sustainable development in agriculture because of population increase,, thereby decreasing cultivable land [14]. When the electrical conductivity (EC) of the saturation extract (ECe) in the root zone increases to 4 dS m−1 (about 40 mM NaCl) at 25 °C and has an exchangeable sodium of 15% or more, then the soil is called saline soil [15]. It was estimated that more than half of the total cultivable land would be salinity-affected by the year 2050 [13]. In addition, many reasons, such as irrigation with saline water and poor cultural practices, are increasing the amount of salinized soil at a significant rate every year [16]. Along with decreasing yield, salt stress also alters the quality of crops [17]. Salinity strikes plant in various ways, including abnormalities in flowering and fruiting patterns [18], and delayed formation of roots and shoots [19]. Although plants have self-defense mechanisms [20], they cannot cope with severe salinity [21]. Therefore, additional approaches such as inoculating plants with PGPB offer a great advantage to combat salt stress [21]. The PGPB has remarkable impacts to ensure normal growth and development of plants under salinity [22]. A good number of bacterial strains, such as Bacillus spp., Pseudomonas spp., Frankia spp., and Rhizobia spp., have been identified that are capable of aiding plants to tolerate various environmental stresses including salinity [11,22,23]. In addition, the magnificent benefits of the PGPB have developed a large trading platform; the commercialization of PGPB has been reported by Vessey [24] and Lucy et al. [25]. Rice is the most extensively cultivated and staple food crop in Bangladesh [26,27,28]. The salinity of soils in the southern coastal regions in the country is a big problem for rice cultivation. Due to climate change, the problem is increasing day by day.
Salinity-tolerant bacteria associated with rice plants can be exploited as natural bioagents for the enhancement of growth and yield of rice in salinity-affected areas. We hypothesized that the isolation and characterization of potential salt-tolerant PGPB strains could be utilized as climate-smart and cost-effective agricultural technologies in the salinity-prone coastal areas of Bangladesh. Therefore, the present study aimed to: (i) isolate and screen potential salt-tolerant bacterial isolates from rice plants cultivated in the soils of saline-prone regions of Bangladesh; (ii) identify and characterize salinity tolerant rice-associated bacteria having plant growth-promoting features using 16S rRNA gene sequencing; and (iii) evaluate some selected salinity tolerant rice-associated bacteria on seedling growth of rice.

2. Results

The results of the current study are divided into three sections—(i) collection of rice plant samples (Figure 1 and Figure 2) from saline soils, and isolation and screening of the salinity tolerant bacteria from rice plants grown in the saline soils; (ii) performance evaluation of the screened salt-tolerant bacterial isolates on seedling growth of rice cv. BRRI dhan29 (a salinity susceptible variety) and BINAdhan-10 (a salinity tolerant variety); and (iii) identification of the best salt tolerant PGPB using 16S rRNA gene sequencing.

2.1. Isolation and Screening of Salinity-Tolerant Bacteria

To isolate and screen the effective salinity-tolerant bacteria, isolated bacteria from the rice plants were cultured in NBA medium containing the varying concentrations: 2%, 4%, 6%, 8%, 10%, and 12% (w/v) of NaCl, and the growth of the bacteria was recorded. Forty-one bacterial isolates including 8 isolates (BTNSo1–BTNSo8) from rice plants grown in the saline soils of Noakhali, 16 isolates (BTCoR1-BTCoR4, BTCoL1-BTCoL6, BTCoSo1-BTCoSo6) from Cox’s Bazar, 6 isolates (BTChL1, BTChL2, BTChR1, BTChR2, BTChSo1, BTChSo2) from Chattogram, and 11 isolates (BTLSo1-BTLSo10 and IBGE3C) from the Lakshmipur district were tested (Table 1).
Among 41 bacterial isolates, only 3 bacterial isolates provided better growth in 10% and 12% NaCl (w/v) (Figure 3). Among these 3 isolates, BTCoSo2 was Gram-negative and the other two (BTCoR2 and IBGE3C) were Gram-positive.

2.2. Effect of Bacterial Isolates on Vegetative Growth of BRRIdhan 29 Seedlings

Representative images of variation in root and shoot lengths through the effects of bacteria at 7 days after inoculation are shown in Figure 4 and Figure 5. In root length, both BTCoSo2 and BTCoR2 are significant compared to the control although there was no significant change observed in IBGE3C. All the treatments showed significant changes in shoot length, root dry weight, and shoot dry weight. Out of these 3 bacteria, the effects of IBGE3C on seedling growth of rice was prominent (Table 2).

2.3. Effect of Bacterial Isolates on Vegetative Growth of BINAdhan-10 Seedlings

Root and shoot length along with their respective dry weight were recorded after seven days of PGPB inoculation (Figure 6 and Figure 7). In root length, changes were significant in BTCoSo2 and BTCoR2 compared to the control, but no significant changes occurred by the application of B. sediminis strain IBGE3C. In shoot length, all three isolates induced significant changes compared to the control, but there were no significant changes among the bacteria treated seedlings. In root and shoot dry weight, significant changes were observed in seedling treated with all the three isolates compared to the control, and there were no significant changes in seedling growth by the isolates of BTCoR2 and BTCoSo2 (Table 3).

2.4. Molecular Identification of the Most Salinity-Tolerant PGPB

A phylogenetic analysis was performed by partial 16S rRNA gene sequencing the most promising salinity-tolerant PGPB isolate, IBGE3C. Following BLAST analysis to search for homology, the sequences together with their closest relatives in GenBank were used to construct a phylogenetic tree using the maximum-likelihood method (Figure 8). In this study, the isolate IBGE3C showed 99.57% sequence homology with Brevibacterium sediminis strain C1 MW564208.1 and B. sediminis strain M15.B MZ054436.1 (Figure 8). Therefore, the isolate IBGE3C was tentatively identified as B. sediminis.

3. Discussion

Salinity is one of the environmental stresses that hamper rice production in the coastal areas of Bangladesh and beyond. To ensure higher crop productivity through environmentally friendly salinity management, the application of the PGPB is a promising biotechnological approach [22,29]. Three bacterial isolates (BTCoSo2, BTCoR2, and B. sediminis strain IBGE3C) were selected from the initial forty-one isolates based on their survivability under high salt stress conditions in the culture medium. These isolates displayed higher tolerance to salinity, and were further investigated for their effects on seedling growth of two popular varieties of rice differing from salinity tolerance.

3.1. Isolation and Screening of the Bacterial Isolates

Salinity is a big problem in crop production in the Southern districts of Bangladesh. The situation is aggravating due to the impacts of climate change. Salinity poses a serious threat to the future food security of the country. This study isolated 41 rice-associated bacteria collected from salt-affected areas in Chattogram, Noakhali, Lakshmipur, and Cox’s Bazar districts of Bangladesh. Bioassay revealed that these bacteria highly differed in salinity tolerance in vitro. Interestingly, three of them, BTCoSo2, BTCoR2, and B. sediminis strain IBGE3C, displayed tolerance of up to 12% of salinity. Isolation of salinity-tolerant bacteria from the salt-adapted plants and soils has previously been reported in several studies [30,31,32]. This study for the first time isolated very high salinity-tolerant bacteria associated with rice cultivated in the salinity affected areas of Bangladesh. Enhancement of salinity tolerance in crop plants by the application of the PGPB has been reported earlier [11]. To be effective in enhancing salinity tolerance by the plant probiotic bacteria, the isolate must be salinity tolerant. Therefore, the findings of this experiment of isolation of salinity-tolerant PGPB from rice are encouraging for their evaluation of the growth promotion of rice.

3.2. Effects of Bacterial Isolates on Rice Seedlings in Petri Dish

Three salt stress-tolerant PGPBs isolated from rice remarkably improved the root and shoot growth of rice. Among the two varieties tested, the PGPB isolates showed better performances in seedling growth of salt-tolerant rice variety, BINAdhan-10 (Figure 6 and Figure 7) compared to salt-susceptible rice variety, BRRI dhan29 (Figure 4 and Figure 5). Enhancement of salt tolerance in rice and other crop plants by the application of the PGPB has been reported [33,34,35,36]. Growth of B. sediminis in nutrient agar medium with up to 20% of NaCl (w/v) along with the optimum growth at 3.3% NaCl (w/v) has been reported [37]. In the current study, we observed the salinity tolerance level of B. sediminis was up to 12% of NaCl (w/v) (Figure 3) in a nutrient agar medium. Furthermore, an improvement in growth of rice seedlings by the inoculation of the isolated PGPB from rice cultivated in saline soils was demonstrated by the current study.
In salt-susceptible BRRI dhan29 at 1% salinity, inoculation with highly salt-tolerant B. sediminis strain IBGE3C displayed a 7% and 62% increase in the root length and shoot length, respectively, compared to the untreated control. Similarly, root dry weight and shoot dry weight were increased by 238% and 107%, respectively, by the treatment of the same isolate compared to control. Moreover, in salt-tolerant BINAdhan-10 at 1% salinity, B. sediminis strain IBGE3C offered 44% and 31% increase in root and shoot length, respectively. Although root dry weight was increased by 28%, shoot dry weight was decreased by 8% in the same condition. In the case of isolate BTCoSo2 on BRRI dhan29 at 1% salinity, it offered a 46% and 54% increase in the root length and shoot length, respectively, and a 97% and 35% increase in the root dry weight and shoot dry weight compared to the untreated control. However, in BINAdhan-10, the same isolate increased the root length and shoot length by 5% and 4%, respectively, compared to control. In addition, root dry weight and shoot weight were increased by 28% and 6%, respectively, by the treatment of that particular isolate. Besides, the isolate BTCoR2 at 1% in BRRI dhan29 increased the root length by 96% and shoot length by 48%; root dry weight and shoot dry weight by 132% and 56%, respectively, compared to the untreated control. Moreover, this isolate on BINA dhan 10 at the same salinity level increased the root length and shoot length by 13% and 8%, respectively; and root dry weight was increased by 3%, and shoot dry weight was decreased by 8%. In this study, the isolated B. sediminis strain IBGE3C displayed the best performances in terms of salinity tolerance and seedling growth of rice. However, a further study is needed to test the effects of the rice PGPB on growth and yield of rice in greenhouse and field conditions under varying levels of soil salinity.

3.3. DNA Sequencing and Molecular Identification of the Best Performing Isolate IBGE3C

The 16S rRNA is a gold standard and convenient molecular method for the molecular identification of bacteria. The best performer rice probiotic bacterial isolate, IBGE3C (accession no. MZ573246.1) showed 99.57% sequence similarity with Brevibacterium sediminis CGMCC 1.15472 (accession no. NR_153678.1). Although salinity-tolerant Brevibacterium spp. have been discovered from some soils [35,37,38] and plant sources [36,38], this study for the first time discovered a high salinity (12% NaCl w/v)-tolerant B. sediminis strain IBGE3C from rice plants cultivated in the salt-affected area (Lakshmipur district) of Bangladesh. The phylogenetic tree based on the 16S rRNA gene sequences showed that the 10 isolates were divided into 3 groups representing a relatively low diversity for the rhizospheric Brevibacter species.
The mechanisms of salinity tolerance in bacteria have been reported by Kumar et al. [39]. Although the mechanisms of salinity tolerance and growth promotion of plants by the application of the PGPB have not precisely been elucidated [22], a large body of literature is available on this aspect [35,36,40]. Plant growth-promoting bacteria have both active and passive mechanisms to augment availability of the essential nutrient elements for plants and improve soil health [41]. PGPB minimizes the detrimental effects of salinity by retaining the required ratio of Na+/K+ through excreting exopolysaccharides (EPS) that consequently secure their survival under salt-stressed conditions [42,43]. Similar to other PGPB, Brevibacterium spp. can produce significant amounts of ACC deaminase [36], and it has been found that inoculation of plants with ACC deaminase-producing bacteria increases root biomass and produce longer roots [11,44]. High production of antioxidant enzymes reduces the generation of hydrogen peroxide under salt stress [45]. PGPB directly help a plant’s salt tolerance and hence, improve growth by producing IAA [46,47]. Moreover, the sodium ion (Na+) binding capacity of PGPB maintains cellular turgidity and defends chloroplast from adverse impacts of salinity and thus increasing photosynthesis, chlorophyll synthesis, and plant growth under salt-stressed conditions [48,49]. However, further in silico and laboratory analyses of the whole-genome sequence of this salinity-tolerant bacteria would result in interesting insights into its plant growth promoting and salinity tolerance mechanism that are needed for their practical application in rice. This study for the first time demonstrated that a very high salt-tolerant PGPB isolate, B. sediminis IBGE3C, native to rice plants cultivated in salt-affected areas, enhanced seedling growth of rice under varying levels of salinity.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Samples Collection

Two rice varieties were selected; one was salinity susceptible (BRRI dhan29) and the other was salinity tolerant (BINAdhan-10). Rice plant samples were collected from four coastal districts of Bangladesh (Chattogram, Cox’s Bazar, Lakshmipur, and Noakhali). Sample collection areas were selected based on salinity in the soil. The variety of plant samples collected from Chattogram and Noakhali were cv. BRRI dhan29. In addition, Cox’s Bazar and Lakshmipur plant samples were cv. BRRI dhan28. All plant samples were salt-susceptible and the plant varieties were confirmed by corresponding field farmers. Seeds were collected from the Bangladesh Rice Research Institute (BRRI), regional station, Cumilla, and Bangladesh Institute of Nuclear Agriculture (BINA), substation in Cumilla. The seed samples were selected based on salinity tolerance. Five rice plant samples were randomly collected from the corresponding field of each of the four districts mentioned earlier. The rice seedlings were uprooted having the rhizospheric soils and kept in a sterile ziplock polybag with marking to avoid any cross-contamination during sampling [49].

4.2. Isolation and Screening of Bacteria

For the collection of potential salt-tolerant bacteria, different plant parts such as the leaf, root, and rhizospheric soil were taken. The bacteria were isolated from plant parts using protocols described earlier [11,50]. Six-fold serial dilution was prepared in autoclaved water [51]. Of them, fifty microliter aliquots from a particular dilution were taken through a pipette and spread on nutrient broth agar (NBA) plates and then placed in the incubator for 24 h at 26 °C ± 1 °C. After incubation, different bacterial colonies were isolated and purified on an NBA medium. For salt tolerance evaluation, the isolated bacteria were grown in NBA medium with various doses of sodium chloride (NaCl) (2%, 4%, 6%, 8%, 10%, and 12% w/v). Then, the growth of the bacteria in the medium with different concentrations of salt was observed and recorded.
For the identification of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, a loopful of bacteria was taken onto a glass slide and mixed with a drop of 3% KOH solution to make a smear [52]. After a few minutes, their characteristics were observed. A positive reaction is represented by the formation of thread-like mass, whereas KOH positives are Gram-positive and the KOH negatives are Gram-negative [53]. The current study involved three replications of each experiment.

4.3. Preparation of Bacterial Inocula

Bacterial isolates were cultured in 250 mL conical flasks containing 200 mL NB broth medium on a shaker at 120 rpm for 72 h at 27 °C. To collect bacterial cells, the broth was centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for 1 min at 4 °C, and two times washed with SDW (Sterile Distilled Water). The bacterial pellets were suspended in around 1 mL SDW and vortex for 45 s before using for the seed treatment.

4.4. Seed Treatment with Bacteria

One gram of surface-sterilized seeds was soaked into bacterial suspension. The bacteria treated seeds were dried overnight at room temperature to ensure a better coating of the seeds with bacteria [54].

4.5. Seedling Assay

The inoculated seeds were placed on a Petri dish containing a water-soaked sterilized filter paper [54,55,56,57]. After the germination of seeds, the seedlings were allowed to grow for one week. The seedlings were watered on alternate days. The seedling assay was carried out under varying levels of salinity such as 0%, 0.2%, 0.4%, 0.6%, 0.8%, 1%, 2%, 4%, 6%, 8%, and 10% NaCl (w/v). However, data were taken from the 0% to 1% level of salinity because the germination of rice seeds sharply declined from 1% salinity and no germination occurred above 2% salt concentration and so on.

4.6. Genomic DNA Extraction, Ribosomal Gene (16S rRNA) Sequencing, and Data Analysis

Wizard®’s Genomic DNA Purification Kit (Cat. No A1120) was used for the extraction of DNA from pure culture of bacteria. DNA quantity and purity were determined with NanoDrop 2000 (ThermoFisher, Waltham, MA, USA) by measuring 260/280 absorbance ratios, and stored at −20 °C. Following DNA extraction, PCR amplification was carried out targeting the ribosomal (16S rRNA) gene fragments. The 16S rRNA gene was amplified using universal primers 27F (5′-AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG-3′) and U1492R (5′-CTACGGCTACCTTGTTACGA-3′) [55,56,57,58]. The individual PCR reaction mixture contained nuclease-free water, buffer, dNTPs, forward primer, reverse primer, Taq polymerase, and sample DNA. PCR amplification was performed in the Veriti® 96-Well thermal cycler (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). PCR product was sequenced using Sanger dideoxy sequencing method. Using Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) version 7.0 for the larger datasets [59], the nucleotide sequence of the corresponding isolates was visualized. In order to search for nucleotide sequences similarity, Genbank databases were used by online program nucleotide BLAST (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast/Blast.cgi (accessed on 21 November 2021)). Closely related sequences were retrieved from NCBI and subjected to multiple sequence alignment by ClustalW program. Trimmomatic program (version 0.39) was used to estimate the quality of each sequence, edit, and trim poor quality sequences [60]. A maximum-likelihood tree was generated by MEGA 7.0 software using default parameters, and visualized by iTOL v5.6.1 [61]. Nodal confidence in the resulting phylogenetic relationships was assessed using the bootstrap test (1000 replicates). The sequences of the strain IBGE3C were submitted in NCBI [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov (accessed on 21 November 2021)], under the GenBank accession numbers: MZ573246.1.

4.7. Statistical Analysis

The statistical methods include one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) using Minitab (version 2017) Fisher’s Least Significant Difference (LSD) method for grouping analysis, and MS excel (MS version 2017) for preparing graphs and other calculations. A two-tailed Student’s t-test was used for the comparisons across the means of four groups, and p values < 0.05 were considered as statistically significant.

5. Conclusions

The mutualistic association between PGPB and plants is well established. This study scrutinized three highly salinity-tolerant bacterial isolates obtained from rice cultivated in the saline soils of Bangladesh. These bacterial isolates, viz., BTCoSo2, BTCoR2, and IBGE3C were evaluated on growth promotion of rice seedlings. In general, these elite bacterial strains improved the seedling growth of rice varieties (BRRI dhan29 and BINAdhan-10) with varying levels of salinity tolerance. However, the effects of the bacteria were more pronounced in BINAdhan-10. Among the bacterial isolates, the best performing one, strain IBGE3C, was tentatively identified as B. sediminis using 16S rRNA gene sequencing. The identification of an isolate of salinity-tolerant and rice growth-promoting B. sediminis strain IBGE3C is the first evidence in Bangladesh. The B. sediminis isolated in this study showed PGP abilities, which is potential to be used as PGPB. This is a pre-field study under pilot phase investigation of some potential salt-tolerant PGPB from rice. The results indicate that our three salinity tolerant isolates could be useful in the formulation of new PGPB inoculants. Although the findings of this study are limited to in vitro bioassay, these findings could serve as the bench mark clues for further investigation of the performances and mode of action of these bacterial isolates in promoting growth and increasing the yield of rice plants under adverse field conditions in the salinity-prone coastal regions of Bangladesh. Further studies are also needed for field evaluation of the performance of the particular strain of B. sediminis on rice in the saline soils of Bangladesh.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.I.; methodology, M.-U.-R.; formal analysis, M.-U.-R. and N.U.M.; investigation, M.-U.-R.; resources, T.I.; data curation, A.S.; writing—original draft preparation, M.-U.-R. and I.B.N.; writing—review and editing, M.-U.-R., A.S. and N.U.M.; visualization, M.N.H.; supervision, T.I.; project administration, T.I.; writing—critical review and editing, T.I., M.N.H. and I.B.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Bangladesh Academy of Sciences under a project No. BAS-USDA PAL CR-11 to T.I.

Data Availability Statement

The sequences were submitted in NCBI (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov, accessed on 28 June 2022), under the GenBank accession numbers: MZ573246.1.

Acknowledgments

The author M.-U.-M. is grateful to A.F.M. Yusuf Haider, Professor and Chairperson, Department of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, BRAC University, Dhaka for recommending to conduct this research at the IBGE labs under the guidance of T.I. T.I. is thankful to Bangladesh Academy of Sciences (BAS) for the funding of this work under a project No. BAS-USDA PALS CR-11.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

ECElectrical conductivity
ECeElectrical conductivity of the saturation extract
RPMRotation per minute
NaClSodium chloride
KOHPotassium hydroxide
SDWSterile distilled water
ACC1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid
IAAIndole-3-acetic acid
NBANutrient broth agar
DNADeoxyribonucleic acid
RNARibonucleic acid
PCRPolymerase chain reaction
BINABangladesh Institute of Nuclear Agriculture
BRRIBangladesh Rice Research Institute
IBGEInstitute of Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering
BSMRAUBangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Agricultural University
NCBINational Center for Biotechnology Information
BLASTBasic Local Alignment Search Tool
ANOVAAnalysis of variance
LSDLeast Significant Difference

References

  1. Zörb, C.; Geilfus, C.-M.; Dietz, K.-J. Salinity and Crop Yield. Plant Biol. 2019, 21, 31–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Gupta, A.; Mishra, R.; Rai, S.; Bano, A.; Pathak, N.; Fujita, M.; Kumar, M.; Hasanuzzaman, M. Mechanistic Insights of Plant Growth Promoting Bacteria Mediated Drought and Salt Stress Tolerance in Plants for Sustainable Agriculture. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 3741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Baten, M.A.; Seal, L.; Lisa, K.S. Salinity Intrusion in Interior Coast of Bangladesh: Challenges to Agriculture in South-Central Coastal Zone. Am. J. Clim. Chang. 2015, 4, 248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Szabo, S.; Hossain, M.; Adger, W.N.; Matthews, Z.; Ahmed, S.; Lázár, A.N.; Ahmad, S. Soil Salinity, Household Wealth and Food Insecurity in Tropical Deltas: Evidence from South-West Coast of Bangladesh. Sustain. Sci. 2016, 11, 411–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Nawaz, A.; Farooq, M.; Nadeem, F.; Siddique, K.H.; Lal, R. Rice–Wheat Cropping Systems in South Asia: Issues, Options and Opportunities. Crop Pasture Sci. 2019, 70, 395–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hasan, M.H.; Rahman, M.R.; Haque, A.; Hossain, T. Soil Salinity Hazard Assessment in Bangladesh Coastal Zone. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Disaster Risk Management, Dhaka, Bangladesh, 12–14 January 2019. [Google Scholar]
  7. Cominelli, E.; Conti, L.; Tonelli, C.; Galbiati, M. Challenges and Perspectives to Improve Crop Drought and Salinity Tolerance. New Biotechnol. 2013, 30, 355–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Visarada, K.; Meena, K.; Aruna, C.; Srujana, S.; Saikishore, N.; Seetharama, N. Transgenic Breeding: Perspectives and Prospects. Crop Sci. 2009, 49, 1555–1563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bradford, K.J.; Van Deynze, A.; Gutterson, N.; Parrott, W.; Strauss, S.H. Regulating Transgenic Crops Sensibly: Lessons from Plant Breeding, Biotechnology and Genomics. Nat. Biotechnol. 2005, 23, 439–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Chandler, S.F.; Sanchez, C. Genetic Modification; the Development of Transgenic Ornamental Plant Varieties. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2012, 10, 891–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hossain, M.T.; Islam, T. Amelioration of Salinity Stress by Bacillus Species as Promoters of Plant Growth in Saline Soil. In Bacilli in Agrobiotechnology; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2022; pp. 199–208. [Google Scholar]
  12. Zalidis, G.; Stamatiadis, S.; Takavakoglou, V.; Eskridge, K.; Misopolinos, N. Impacts of Agricultural Practices on Soil and Water Quality in the Mediterranean Region and Proposed Assessment Methodology. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2002, 88, 137–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hassani, A.; Azapagic, A.; Shokri, N. Global Predictions of Primary Soil Salinization under Changing Climate in the 21st Century. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 6663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Ayub, M.A.; Usman, M.; Faiz, T.; Umair, M.; Rizwan, M.; Ali, S.; Zia ur Rehman, M. Restoration of Degraded Soil for Sustainable Agriculture. In Soil Health Restoration and Management; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2020; pp. 31–81. [Google Scholar]
  15. Osman, K.T. Saline and Sodic Soils. In Management of Soil Problems; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2018; pp. 255–298. [Google Scholar]
  16. Shrivastava, P.; Kumar, R. Soil Salinity: A Serious Environmental Issue and Plant Growth Promoting Bacteria as One of the Tools for Its Alleviation. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2015, 22, 123–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. dos Santos, T.B.; Ribas, A.F.; de Souza, S.G.H.; Budzinski, I.G.F.; Domingues, D.S. Physiological Responses to Drought, Salinity, and Heat Stress in Plants: A Review. Stresses 2022, 2, 113–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Egamberdieva, D.; Wirth, S.; Bellingrath-Kimura, S.D.; Mishra, J.; Arora, N.K. Salt-Tolerant Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria for Enhancing Crop Productivity of Saline Soils. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 2791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Jamil, M.; Rha, E.-S. The Effect of Salinity (NaCl) on the Germination and Seedling of Sugar Beet (Beta Vulgaris L.) and Cabbage (Brassica Oleracea L.). Plant Resour. 2004, 7, 226–232. [Google Scholar]
  20. Ryan, C.A.; Jagendorf, A. Self Defense by Plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1995, 92, 4075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Safdar, H.; Amin, A.; Shafiq, Y.; Ali, A.; Yasin, R.; Shoukat, A.; Hussan, M.U.; Sarwar, M.I. A Review: Impact of Salinity on Plant Growth. Nat. Sci. 2019, 17, 34–40. [Google Scholar]
  22. Islam, M.T.; Rahman, M.; Pandey, P.; Jha, C.K.; Aeron, A. Bacilli and Agrobiotechnology; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2016; Volume 6, pp. 47–87. [Google Scholar]
  23. Glick, B.R. Plant Growth-Promoting Bacteria: Mechanisms and Applications. Scientifica 2012, 2012, 963401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Vessey, J.K. Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria as Biofertilizers. Plant Soil 2003, 255, 571–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Lucy, M.; Reed, E.; Glick, B.R. Applications of Free Living Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2004, 86, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Shelley, I.J.; Takahashi-Nosaka, M.; Kano-Nakata, M.; Haque, M.S.; Inukai, Y. Rice Cultivation in Bangladesh: Present Scenario, Problems, and Prospects. J. Int. Coop. Agric. Dev. 2016, 14, 20–29. [Google Scholar]
  27. Chowdhury, M.A. Sustainability of Accelerated Rice Production in Bangladesh: Technological Issues and the Environment. Bangladesh J. Agric. Res. 2009, 34, 523–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Khan, A.; Huda, F.A.; Alam, A. Farm Household Technical Efficiency: A Study on Rice Producers in Selected Areas of Jamalpur District in Bangladesh. Eur. J. Soc. Sci. 2010, 14, 262–271. [Google Scholar]
  29. Rahman, M.; Sabir, A.A.; Mukta, J.A.; Khan, M.; Alam, M.; Mohi-Ud-Din, M.; Miah, M.; Rahman, M.; Islam, M.T. Plant probiotic bacteria Bacillus and Paraburkholderia improve growth, yield and content of antioxidants in strawberry fruit. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 2504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Kearl, J.; McNary, C.; Lowman, J.S.; Mei, C.; Aanderud, Z.T.; Smith, S.T.; West, J.; Colton, E.; Hamson, M.; Nielsen, B.L. Salt-Tolerant Halophyte Rhizosphere Bacteria Stimulate Growth of Alfalfa in Salty Soil. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 1849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Ansari, M.; Shekari, F.; Mohammadi, M.H.; Juhos, K.; Végvári, G.; Biró, B. Salt-Tolerant Plant Growth-Promoting Bacteria Enhanced Salinity Tolerance of Salt-Tolerant Alfalfa (Medicago Sativa L.) Cultivars at High Salinity. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2019, 41, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Sharma, A.; Dev, K.; Sourirajan, A.; Choudhary, M. Isolation and Characterization of Salt-Tolerant Bacteria with Plant Growth-Promoting Activities from Saline Agricultural Fields of Haryana, India. J. Genet. Eng. Biotechnol. 2021, 19, 195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Nakbanpote, W.; Panitlurtumpai, N.; Sangdee, A.; Sakulpone, N.; Sirisom, P.; Pimthong, A. Salt-Tolerant and Plant Growth-Promoting Bacteria Isolated from Zn/Cd Contaminated Soil: Identification and Effect on Rice under Saline Conditions. J. Plant Interact. 2014, 9, 379–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Shultana, R.; Kee Zuan, A.T.; Yusop, M.R.; Saud, H.M. Characterization of Salt-Tolerant Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria and the Effect on Growth and Yield of Saline-Affected Rice. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0238537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Wang, R.; Wang, C.; Feng, Q.; Liou, R.-M.; Lin, Y.-F. Biological Inoculant of Salt-Tolerant Bacteria for Plant Growth Stimulation under Different Saline Soil Conditions. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2021, 31, 398–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Chopra, A.; Vandana, U.K.; Rahi, P.; Satpute, S.; Mazumder, P.B. Plant Growth Promoting Potential of Brevibacterium Sediminis A6 Isolated from the Tea Rhizosphere of Assam, India. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2020, 27, 101610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Chen, P.; Zhang, L.; Wang, J.; Ruan, J.; Han, X.; Huang, Y. Brevibacterium Sediminis Sp. Nov., Isolated from Deep-Sea Sediments from the Carlsberg and Southwest Indian Ridges. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2016, 66, 5268–5274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Siddikee, M.A.; Chauhan, P.S.; Anandham, R.; Han, G.-H.; Sa, T.-M. Isolation, Characterization, and Use for Plant Growth Promotion under Salt Stress, of ACC Deaminase-Producing Halotolerant Bacteria Derived from Coastal Soil. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2010, 20, 1577–1584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Kumar, A.; Singh, S.; Gaurav, A.K.; Srivastava, S.; Verma, J.P. Plant Growth-Promoting Bacteria: Biological Tools for the Mitigation of Salinity Stress in Plants. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 1216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Chatterjee, P.; Samaddar, S.; Niinemets, Ü.; Sa, T.-M. Brevibacterium Linens RS16 Confers Salt Tolerance to Oryza Sativa Genotypes by Regulating Antioxidant Defense and H+ ATPase Activity. Microbiol. Res. 2018, 215, 89–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Sarker, A.; Ansary, M.; Rahman, W.; Hossain, M.N.; Islam, T. Prospect and challenges for sustainable management of climate change-associated stresses to soil and plant health by beneficial rhizobacteria. Stresses 2021, 1, 200–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Singh, R.P.; Jha, P.N. The Multifarious PGPR Serratia Marcescens CDP-13 Augments Induced Systemic Resistance and Enhanced Salinity Tolerance of Wheat (Triticum Aestivum L.). PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0155026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Vurukonda, S.S.K.P.; Vardharajula, S.; Shrivastava, M.; SkZ, A. Enhancement of Drought Stress Tolerance in Crops by Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria. Microbiol. Res. 2016, 184, 13–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Belimov, A.A.; Dodd, I.C.; Safronova, V.I.; Hontzeas, N.; Davies, W.J. Pseudomonas Brassicacearum Strain Am3 Containing 1-Aminocyclopropane-1-Carboxylate Deaminase Can Show Both Pathogenic and Growth-Promoting Properties in Its Interaction with Tomato. J. Exp. Bot. 2007, 58, 1485–1495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Kim, S.-Y.; Lim, J.-H.; Park, M.-R.; Kim, Y.-J.; Park, T.-I.; Seo, Y.-W.; Choi, K.-G.; Yun, S.-J. Enhanced Antioxidant Enzymes Are Associated with Reduced Hydrogen Peroxide in Barley Roots under Saline Stress. BMB Rep. 2005, 38, 218–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Qin, Y.; Druzhinina, I.S.; Pan, X.; Yuan, Z. Microbially Mediated Plant Salt Tolerance and Microbiome-Based Solutions for Saline Agriculture. Biotechnol. Adv. 2016, 34, 1245–1259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Dame, Z.T.; Rahman, M.; Islam, T. Bacilli as sources of agrobiotechnology: Recent advances and future directions. Green Chem. Lett. Rev. 2021, 14, 246–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kang, S.-M.; Khan, A.L.; Waqas, M.; You, Y.-H.; Kim, J.-H.; Kim, J.-G.; Hamayun, M.; Lee, I.-J. Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria Reduce Adverse Effects of Salinity and Osmotic Stress by Regulating Phytohormones and Antioxidants in Cucumis Sativus. J. Plant Interact. 2014, 9, 673–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Del Amor, F.M.; Cuadra-Crespo, P. Plant Growth-Promoting Bacteria as a Tool to Improve Salinity Tolerance in Sweet Pepper. Funct. Plant Biol. 2011, 39, 82–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Onda, Y.; Kato, H.; Hoshi, M.; Takahashi, Y.; Nguyen, M.-L. Soil Sampling and Analytical Strategies for Mapping Fallout in Nuclear Emergencies Based on the Fukushima Dai-Ichi Nuclear Power Plant Accident. J. Environ. Radioact. 2015, 139, 300–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Mukta, J.A.; Rahman, M.; Sabir, A.A.; Gupta, D.R.; Surovy, M.Z.; Rahman, M.; Islam, M.T. Chitosan and plant probiotics application enhance growth and yield of strawberry. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2017, 11, 9–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Anjum, N.; Chandra, R. Endophytic Bacteria: Optimization of Isolation Procedure from Various Medicinal Plants and Their Preliminary Characterization. Asian J. Pharm. Clin. Res. 2015, 8, 233–238. [Google Scholar]
  53. Arthi, K.; Appalaraju, B.; Parvathi, S. Vancomycin Sensitivity and KOH String Test as an Alternative to Gram Staining of Bacteria. Indian J. Med. Microbiol. 2003, 21, 121–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Khan, M.M.A.; Haque, E.; Paul, N.C.; Khaleque, M.A.; Al-Garni, S.M.; Rahman, M.; Islam, M.T. Enhancement of growth and grain yield of rice in nutrient deficient soils by rice probiotic bacteria. Rice Sci. 2017, 24, 264–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Sarkar, A.; Islam, T.; Biswas, G.C.; Alam, S.; Hossain, M.; Talukder, N.M. Screening for phosphate solubilizing bacteria inhabiting the rhizoplane of rice grown in acidic soil in Bangladesh. Acta Microbiol. Immunol. Hung. 2012, 59, 199–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Islam, M.T.; Deora, A.; Hashidoko, Y.; Rahman, A.; Ito, T.; Tahara, S. Isolation and identification of potential phosphate solubilizing bacteria from the rhizoplane of Oryza sativa L. cv. BR29 of Bangladesh. Z. Naturforsch. 2007, 62c, 103–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Islam, M.T.; Hasidoko, Y.; Deora, A.; Ito, T.; Tahara, S. Suppression of damping-off disease in host plants by the rhizoplane bacterium Lysobacter sp. strain SB-K88 is linked to plant colonization and antibiosis against soilborne Peronosporomycetes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2005, 71, 3786–3796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Hoque, M.N.; Istiaq, A.; Clement, R.A.; Gibson, K.M.; Saha, O.; Islam, O.K.; Abir, R.A.; Sultana, M.; Siddiki, A.Z.; Crandall, K.A.; et al. Insights into the resistome of bovine clinical mastitis microbiome, a key factor in disease complication. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Tamura, K. MEGA7: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2016, 33, 1870–1874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Rahman, M.S.; Hoque, M.N.; Puspo, J.A.; Islam, M.R.; Das, N.; Siddique, M.A.; Hossain, M.A.; Sultana, M. Microbiome signature and diversity regulates the level of energy production under anaerobic condition. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 19777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Letunic, I.; Bork, P. Interactive Tree of Life (iTOL) v4: Recent updates and new developments. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, W256–W259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Stresses 02 00020 g001 550
Figure 1. Collected rice plant samples from four different districts of Bangladesh for isolation of salinity tolerant PGPB. Images (a–d) of rice plants were collected from the farmers fields in Chattogram, Cox’s Bazar, Lakshmipur, and Noakhali districts of Bangladesh. The age of the collected plants ranged from 35–50 days.
Figure 1. Collected rice plant samples from four different districts of Bangladesh for isolation of salinity tolerant PGPB. Images (a–d) of rice plants were collected from the farmers fields in Chattogram, Cox’s Bazar, Lakshmipur, and Noakhali districts of Bangladesh. The age of the collected plants ranged from 35–50 days.
Stresses 02 00020 g001
Stresses 02 00020 g002 550
Figure 2. Rice plant sample collection sites (black bullets) in Bangladesh.
Figure 2. Rice plant sample collection sites (black bullets) in Bangladesh.
Stresses 02 00020 g002
Stresses 02 00020 g003 550
Figure 3. Growth and survival of three potential isolates in nutrient agar medium using higher concentrations of salts including ((Left) panel) 10% NaCl (w/v) and ((Right) panel) 12% NaCl (w/v).
Figure 3. Growth and survival of three potential isolates in nutrient agar medium using higher concentrations of salts including ((Left) panel) 10% NaCl (w/v) and ((Right) panel) 12% NaCl (w/v).
Stresses 02 00020 g003
Stresses 02 00020 g004 550
Figure 4. Assessment of BRRI dhan29 rice seedlings treated with three bacterial isolates at 1% salinity. (a) Control; (b) BTCoSo2; (c) BTCoR2, and (d) IBGE3C.
Figure 4. Assessment of BRRI dhan29 rice seedlings treated with three bacterial isolates at 1% salinity. (a) Control; (b) BTCoSo2; (c) BTCoR2, and (d) IBGE3C.
Stresses 02 00020 g004
Stresses 02 00020 g005 550
Figure 5. Effects of bacterial isolates on (a) root length; (b) shoot length; (c) root dry weight, and (d) shoot dry weight of BRRI dhan29 rice seedlings under 1% salinity. The IBGE3C was identified as Brevibacterium sediminis. From left to right, treatments are indicated under columns. Results are expressed in relative length and dry weight compared to control where values are means and bars indicate standard errors (n = 3). * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.005 as compared to control.
Figure 5. Effects of bacterial isolates on (a) root length; (b) shoot length; (c) root dry weight, and (d) shoot dry weight of BRRI dhan29 rice seedlings under 1% salinity. The IBGE3C was identified as Brevibacterium sediminis. From left to right, treatments are indicated under columns. Results are expressed in relative length and dry weight compared to control where values are means and bars indicate standard errors (n = 3). * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.005 as compared to control.
Stresses 02 00020 g005
Stresses 02 00020 g006 550
Figure 6. Assessment of BINAdhan-10 rice seedlings treated with three bacterial isolates at 1% salinity. (a) Control; (b) BTCoSo2; (c) BTCoR2, and (d) B. sediminis strain IBGE3C.
Figure 6. Assessment of BINAdhan-10 rice seedlings treated with three bacterial isolates at 1% salinity. (a) Control; (b) BTCoSo2; (c) BTCoR2, and (d) B. sediminis strain IBGE3C.
Stresses 02 00020 g006
Stresses 02 00020 g007 550
Figure 7. Effects of bacterial isolates on (a) root length; (b) shoot length; (c) root dry weight, and (d) shoot dry weight in BINAdhan-10 rice seedlings under 1% salinity. IBGE3C was identified as Brevibacterium sediminis. From left to right, treatments are indicated under columns. Results are expressed in relative length and dry weight compared to control where values are means and bars indicate standard errors (n = 3). * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.005 as compared to control.
Figure 7. Effects of bacterial isolates on (a) root length; (b) shoot length; (c) root dry weight, and (d) shoot dry weight in BINAdhan-10 rice seedlings under 1% salinity. IBGE3C was identified as Brevibacterium sediminis. From left to right, treatments are indicated under columns. Results are expressed in relative length and dry weight compared to control where values are means and bars indicate standard errors (n = 3). * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.005 as compared to control.
Stresses 02 00020 g007
Stresses 02 00020 g008 550
Figure 8. Maximum likelihood (ML) phylogenetic tree of Brevibacterium sediminis strain IBGE3C, and some of its closest phylogenetic relatives. Bootstrap values are referred to by the numbers on branches. Delftia tsuruhatensis strain BTLM2 MG661808.1 served as an outgroup.
Figure 8. Maximum likelihood (ML) phylogenetic tree of Brevibacterium sediminis strain IBGE3C, and some of its closest phylogenetic relatives. Bootstrap values are referred to by the numbers on branches. Delftia tsuruhatensis strain BTLM2 MG661808.1 served as an outgroup.
Stresses 02 00020 g008
Table
Table 1. Growth of isolated bacteria from different districts in the NBA medium containing varying concentrations of NaCl (w/v).
Table 1. Growth of isolated bacteria from different districts in the NBA medium containing varying concentrations of NaCl (w/v).
Name of Isolates% NaCl Concentration (w/v)
Control2%4%6%8%10%12%
BTNSo1+++++++++++NGNGNG
BTNSo2+++++++++++NGNGNG
BTNSo3++++++++++++NGNGNG
BTNSo4+++++++NGNGNG
BTNSo5+++++++++++++++++
BTNSo6++++++++++++NGNGNG
BTNSo7++++++++++++NGNGNG
BTNSo8++++++++NGNGNG
BTCoR1++++++++NGNGNG
BTCoR2++++++++++++++++++
BTCoR3+++++++++++++++++
BTCoR4+++++++++++++NGNG
BTCoL1++++++++++++++++NG
BTCoL2++++++++++++++++NG
BTCoL3++++++++++++++NG
BTCoL4+++++++++NGNGNG
BTCoL5++++++++++++++NG
BTCoL6+++++++++++++NG
BTCoSo1+++++++++++NGNG
BTCoSo2++++++++++++++++++++
BTCoSo3++++++++++++NGNGNG
BTCoSo4+++++++++++NGNG
BTCoSo5++++++++++NGNGNG
BTCoSo6++++++++++NGNGNG
BTChL1++++++++++++++++NG
BTChL2++++++++++++++++NG
BTChR1++++++++++NGNG
BTChR2++++++++++++++NG
BTChSo1++++++++++++NGNGNG
BTChSo2+++++++++++NGNGNG
BTLSo1+++++++++NGNGNG
BTLSo2++++++++++NGNGNG
BTLSo3+++++++++++NGNGNG
BTLSo4++++++++++++NGNGNG
BTLSo5+++++++++++NGNGNG
BTLSo6+++++++++++NGNGNG
BTLSo7++++++++++++NGNG
BTLSo8++++++++++++NGNG
BTLSo9++++++++++++NGNG
BTLSo10+++++++++++++++++
IBGE3C+++++++++++++++++++
Note: “+++”, high growth; “++”, moderate growth; “+”, low growth, and “NG”, no growth. BTN = bacterial isolates from Noakhali; BTCo = bacterial isolates from Cox’s Bazar; BTCh = bacterial isolates from Chattogram, and BTL = bacterial isolates from Lakshmipur. IBGE3C was also isolated from Lakshmipur.
Table
Table 2. Effects of bacterial isolates on seedling growth of BRRI dhan29 at 1% salinity. Values are mean ± standard error (significance level α = 0.05).
Table 2. Effects of bacterial isolates on seedling growth of BRRI dhan29 at 1% salinity. Values are mean ± standard error (significance level α = 0.05).
TreatmentSeedling Growth *
Root Length (cm)Shoot Length (cm)Root Dry Weight (mg)Shoot Dry Weight (mg)
Control0.87 ± 0.03 c1.23 ± 0.03 c3.23 ± 0.07 d5.4 ± 0.29 d
BTCoSo21.27 ± 0.09 b1.9 ± 0.12 ab6.4 ± 0.36 c7.33 ± 0.22 b
BTCoR21.7 ± 0.06 a1.83 ± 0.09 b7.53 ± 0.33 b8.43 ± 0.27 c
IBGE3C0.93 ± 0.09 c2 ± 0.12 a10.93 ± 1.02 a11.2 ±0.15 a
* Any two means having a common letter (in superscript) are not significantly different at the 5% level of significance.
Table
Table 3. Effects of bacterial isolates on seedling growth of BINAdhan-10 at 1% salinity. Values are mean and provided with standard error (significance level α = 0.05).
Table 3. Effects of bacterial isolates on seedling growth of BINAdhan-10 at 1% salinity. Values are mean and provided with standard error (significance level α = 0.05).
TreatmentSeedling Growth *
Root Length (cm)Shoot Length (cm)Root Dry Weight (mg)Shoot Dry Weight (mg)
Control1.93 ± 0.09 b2.23 ± 0.07 b10.83 ± 0.09 c13.33 ± 0.23 b
BTCoSo22.03 ± 0.12 ab2.33 ± 0.12 a13.93 ± 0.09 b14.23 ± 0.18 ab
BTCoR22.2 ± 0.15 a2.43 ± 0.07 a11.2 ± 0.15 b12.3 ± 0.21 ab
IBGE3C2.8 ± 0.10 ab2.93 ± 0.09 a13.97 ± 0.12 a12.27 ± 0.20 a
* Any two means having a common letter (in superscript) are not significantly different at the 5% level of significance.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mahmud-Ur-Rahman; Naser, I.B.; Mahmud, N.U.; Sarker, A.; Hoque, M.N.; Islam, T. A Highly Salt-Tolerant Bacterium Brevibacterium sediminis Promotes the Growth of Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Seedlings. Stresses 2022, 2, 275-289. https://doi.org/10.3390/stresses2030020

AMA Style

Mahmud-Ur-Rahman, Naser IB, Mahmud NU, Sarker A, Hoque MN, Islam T. A Highly Salt-Tolerant Bacterium Brevibacterium sediminis Promotes the Growth of Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Seedlings. Stresses. 2022; 2(3):275-289. https://doi.org/10.3390/stresses2030020

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mahmud-Ur-Rahman, Iftekhar Bin Naser, Nur Uddin Mahmud, Aniruddha Sarker, M. Nazmul Hoque, and Tofazzal Islam. 2022. "A Highly Salt-Tolerant Bacterium Brevibacterium sediminis Promotes the Growth of Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Seedlings" Stresses 2, no. 3: 275-289. https://doi.org/10.3390/stresses2030020

APA Style

Mahmud-Ur-Rahman, Naser, I. B., Mahmud, N. U., Sarker, A., Hoque, M. N., & Islam, T. (2022). A Highly Salt-Tolerant Bacterium Brevibacterium sediminis Promotes the Growth of Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Seedlings. Stresses, 2(3), 275-289. https://doi.org/10.3390/stresses2030020

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop