Next Article in Journal
Visible-Light-Active Photocatalysts for Environmental Remediation and Organic Synthesis
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
Transition-Metal-Free Access to 2-Subsituted Indolines from Indoles via Dearomative Nucleophilic Addition Using Two-Molecule Organic Photoredox Catalysts
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Renaissance of “Photoredox Catalysis” for Organic Molecules

Department of Applied Chemistry and Biotechnology, Graduate School of Engineering, University of Fukui, 3-9-1 Bunkyo, Fukui 910-8507, Japan
Photochem 2021, 1(3), 458-459; https://doi.org/10.3390/photochem1030028
Submission received: 1 November 2021 / Accepted: 1 November 2021 / Published: 4 November 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Photoredox Catalysis 2021)
The concept of “Photoredox Catalysis” for organic molecules was reported by Sakurai and Pac in 1977 [1], and they called it a “Redox-Photosensitized Reaction” in 1978 [2], because they wanted to make sure the difference in redox reactions using TiO2 was recognized as a “Photocatalyst”. In their studies, a radical cation of phenanthrene (Phen) or a radical anion of 1,4-dicyanobenzene (DCB) serves as an oxidant or a reductant, respectively, through photoinduced electron transfer (PET) between Phen and DCB, to provide unique products. From the 1980s, a lot of similar photoredox organic reactions, mainly with UV irradiation, were developed by Arnold [3], Albini [4], Griesbeck [5], Okada [6], Fukuzumi [7], Mizuno [8], etc. However, the scopes of the substrate, reagent, and product were quite limited, and the control of reactive intermediates, such as radicals and radical ions, was not efficient at this time. Thus, the synthetic application of “Redox-Photosensitized Reaction” to useful organic reactions was unsuccessful. These facts caused a decrease in this type of reports from the latter half of the 1990s. On the other hand, advances in the knowledge of radical reactions using alkyl halides, AIBN, and Bu3SnH from the 1980s showed that radical reaction is a versatile and powerful tool for the transformation of organic compounds, due to the unique reactivity of radicals, their high tolerance for unprotected functional groups compared to ionic reactions, and the well-established reaction pathway of the generated radicals [9,10,11]. This is despite environmental problems, such as the toxicity of these substrates and reagents, difficulties associated with the removal of tin-containing byproducts (Bu3SnX), and harsh conditions (high temperature). Accordingly, there have been efforts to make “Photoredox Catalysis” a more environmentally friendly and cleaner process that can generate reactive species, such as radicals under mild conditions. For example, Yoshimi reported PET-induced decarboxylative alkyl radical generation from aliphatic carboxylic acids using a “Redox-Photosensitized Reaction” system at room temperature in 2007 [12], and, finally, the decarboxylative aryl radical generation of benzoic acids in 2020 [13], which minimize the use of hazardous substances without heating or cooling. MacMillan reported the excellent “Photoredox Catalysis” with visible photoredox catalysts in the 2010s [14], and the number of studies on the visible-light-induced redox reaction rapidly increased. In addition, new technology such as LED and flow reactors that “Photoredox Catalysis” is easily accessible to researchers.
At present, “Photoredox Catalysis” is the most exciting topic in organic chemistry, because photoredox catalysts can provide unique and environmentally friendly processes of organic synthesis. Therefore, this Special Issue aims to illustrate recent developments related to photoinduced reactions with photoredox catalysts. Contributions will focus on a broad range of organic reactions by effective photoredox catalysts.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

The Guest Editor wishes to thank all the authors for their contributions to this Special Issue, all the reviewers for their work in evaluating the submitted articles, and the editorial staff of Photochem for their kind assistance.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Pac, C.; Nakasone, A.; Sakurai, H. Photosensitized electron-transfer reaction of electron donor-acceptor pairs by aromatic hydrocarbons. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1977, 99, 5807–5808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Majima, T.; Pac, C.; Nakasone, A.; Sakurai, H. Redox-photosensitized cleavage of indene dimers using aromatic hydrocarbon-dicyanobenzene systems; Catalysis by the chain radical of aromatic hydrocarbons. J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 1978, 12, 490–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Arnold, D.R.; Snow, M.S. The photochemical nucleophile-olefin combination, aromatic substitution reaction (Part 2): Methanol−cyclic olefins, 1,4-dicyanobenzene. Can. J. Chem. 1988, 66, 3012–3026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Fasani, E.; Peverali, D.; Albini, A. Alkyl radicals from t-butyl esters through photoinduced electron transfer. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 35, 9275–9278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Griesbeck, A.G.; Henz, A.; Peters, K.; Peters, E.-M.; von Schnering, H.G. Photo electron transfer induced macrocyclization of N-phthaloyl-ω-aminocarboxylic acids. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1995, 34, 474–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Okada, K.; Okamoto, K.; Morita, N.; Okubo, K.; Oda, M. Photosensitized decarboxylative Michael addition through N-(acyloxy)phthalimides via an electron-transfer mechanism. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 9401–9402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Fujita, M.; Ishida, A.; Takamuku, S.; Fukuzumi, S. Addition versus oxygenation of alkylbenzenes with 10-methylacridinium ion via photoinduced electron transfer. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 8566–8574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Mizuno, K.; Hashizume, T.; Otsuji, Y. Photocyclodimerization of alkyl, benzyl, and trimethylsilyl vinyl ethers in the presence of 1,4-dicyanonaphthalene. J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 1983, 14, 772–773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Giese, B. Radicals in Organic Synthesis: Formation of Carbon–Carbon Bonds; Pergamon: Oxford, UK, 1986. [Google Scholar]
  10. Zard, S.Z. Radical Reactions in Organic Synthesis; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  11. Renaud, P.; Sibi, M.P. Radicals in Organic Synthesis; Wiely-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  12. Yoshimi, Y.; Itou, T.; Hatanaka, M. Decarboxylative reduction of free aliphatic carboxylic acid by photogenerated cation radical. Chem. Commun. 2007, 48, 5244–5246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Kubosaki, S.; Takeuchi, H.; Iwata, Y.; Tanaka, Y.; Osaka, K.; Yamawaki, M.; Morita, T.; Yoshimi, Y. Visible and UV-light-induced decarboxylative radical reactions of benzoic acids using organic photoredox catalysts. J. Org. Chem. 2020, 85, 5362–5369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Shaw, M.H.; Twilton, J.; MacMillan, D.W.C. Photoredox catalysis in organic chemistry. J. Org. Chem. 2016, 81, 6898–6926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yoshimi, Y. Renaissance of “Photoredox Catalysis” for Organic Molecules. Photochem 2021, 1, 458-459. https://doi.org/10.3390/photochem1030028

AMA Style

Yoshimi Y. Renaissance of “Photoredox Catalysis” for Organic Molecules. Photochem. 2021; 1(3):458-459. https://doi.org/10.3390/photochem1030028

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yoshimi, Yasuharu. 2021. "Renaissance of “Photoredox Catalysis” for Organic Molecules" Photochem 1, no. 3: 458-459. https://doi.org/10.3390/photochem1030028

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop