Next Article in Journal
Demonstration of a Stereospecific Photochemical Meta Effect
Next Article in Special Issue
Photoreactions of Sc3N@C80 with Disilirane, Silirane, and Digermirane: A Photochemical Method to Separate Ih and D5h Isomers
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
Nanostructured Luminescent Micelles: Efficient “Functional Materials” for Sensing Nitroaromatic and Nitramine Explosives
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A P-61 Black Widow Inspired Palladium Biladiene Complex for Efficient Sensitization of Singlet Oxygen Using Visible Light

Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Photochem 2022, 2(1), 58-68; https://doi.org/10.3390/photochem2010005 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 29 November 2021 / Revised: 29 December 2021 / Accepted: 4 January 2022 / Published: 11 January 2022

Abstract

:
Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a promising treatment option that ablates cancerous cells and tumors via photoinduced sensitization of singlet oxygen. Over the last few decades, much work has been devoted to the development of new photochemotherapeutic agents for PDT. A wide variety of macrocyclic tetrapyrrole based photosensitizers have been designed, synthesized and characterized as PDT agents. Many of these complexes have a variety of issues that pose a barrier to their use in humans, including biocompatibility, inherent toxicity, and synthetic hurdles. We have developed a non-traditional, non-cyclic, and non-aromatic tetrapyrrole ligand scaffold, called the biladiene (DMBil1), as an alternative to these traditional photosensitizer complexes. Upon insertion of a heavy atom such as Pd2+ center, Pd[DMBil1] generates singlet oxygen in substantial yields (ΦΔ = 0.54, λexc = 500 nm) when irradiated with visible light. To extend the absorption profile for Pd[DMBil1] deeper into the phototherapeutic window, the tetrapyrrole was conjugated with alkynyl phenyl groups at the 2- and 18-positions (Pd[DMBil2-PE]) resulting in a significant redshift while also increasing singlet oxygen generation (ΦΔ = 0.59, 600 nm). To further modify the dialkynyl-biladiene scaffold, we conjugated a 1,8-diethynylanthracene with to the Pd[DMBil1] tetrapyrrole in order to further extend the compound’s π-conjugation in a cyclic loop that spans the entire tetrapyrrole unit. This new compound (Pd[DMBil2-P61]) is structurally reminiscent of the P61 Black Widow aircraft and absorbs light into the phototherapeutic window (600–900 nm). In addition to detailing the solid-state structure and steady-state spectroscopic properties for this new biladiene, photochemical sensitization studies demonstrated that Pd[DMBil2-P61] can sensitize the formation of 1O2 with quantum yields of ΦΔ = 0.84 upon irradiation with light λ = 600 nm. These results distinguish the Pd[DMBil2-P61] platform as the most efficient biladiene-based singlet oxygen photosensitizer developed to date. When taken together, the improved absorption in the phototherapeutic window and high singlet oxygen sensitization efficiency of Pd[DMBil2-P61] mark this compound as a promising candidate for future study as an agent of photodynamic cancer therapy.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is an alternative treatment option for various types of cancers [1,2], whereby a photosensitizer is administered to a patient, and the treatment site is selectively irradiated with light of a particular wavelength [3]. The photosensitizer absorbs the photons and is promoted into an excited electronic state [4]. From this excited state, the complex then undergoes intersystem crossing, flipping the spin of an electron, and entering into an excited triplet state [5]. The energy in that excited triplet state can then be intermolecularly transferred to ground state triplet molecular oxygen (3O2) [6], resulting in triplet–triplet annihilation. This process returns the photosensitizer to its singlet ground state, while promoting molecular oxygen into an excited singlet state (1O2) [7]. Singlet oxygen is a potent reactive oxygen species (ROS) that can readily oxidize organic matter [8]. For this therapy, the ROS causes oxidative damage to various organelles inside the cell, ultimately leading to cellular death, preferentially via apoptosis rather than necrosis [9,10].
Much research has gone into developing new photosensitizers for PDT against cancer [11,12,13], microbes/viruses [14,15,16], and for various dermatological applications [17]. Many of these complexes are comprised of cyclic, aromatic tetrapyrroles that absorb strongly in the phototherapeutic window (600–900 nm) [18,19,20]. Within this arena, our laboratory and others have actively developed non-traditional tetrapyrroles that contain a single tetrapyrrole, with an sp3-hybridized meso-carbon for applications in photomedicine and catalysis. Some platforms of interest include 10,10-dimethylphlorins [21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29] and 10,10-dimethylisocorroles [30,31,32,33,34,35], however, the most attractive alternative platforms we have prepared and studied for PDT applications have been new oligotetrapyrrole complexes based upon a 10,10-dimethyl-5,15-dipentfluorophenylbiladiene (DMBil1) core [36]. The DMBil1 architecture is a linear oligotetrapyrrole, with an sp3 hybridized meso-carbon at the 10-position. This freebase tetrapyrrole absorbs light as far red as 500 nm with minimal singlet oxygen generation (ΦΔ = 0.015), however, metalation of DMBil1 with Pd2+ to invoke the heavy atom effect [37], induces enhanced intersystem crossing (ISC) through improved spin orbit coupling [38]. Accordingly, the parent biladiene bound to Pd2+ (Pd[DMBil1]) showed a modest redshift in absorption to ~550 nm, and high ISC efficiency and excited state triplet lifetimes on the order of 15–30 μs [39]. These altered photophysics result in improved quantum yields for sensitization of singlet oxygen as Pd[DMBil1] supports ΦΔ = 0.54, upon excitation at 550 nm. Water solubilization of Pd[DMBil1] and related derivatives showed that the biladiene construct is well tolerated by triple-negative breast cancer cell lines in culture [40]. Irradiation of Pd[DMBil1] [40] as well as Pd[DMBil1]–(gold nanoshell) conjugates [41,42] within TNBC cells demonstrated that these architectures provide an exceptionally high phototoxicity index (PI = 5300), and preferentially phototrigger cell death via apoptotic pathways. To date, the main limitation of the Pd[DMBil1] framework for PDT applications is its lack of absorption in the phototherapeutic window of light (600–900 nm) that most deeply penetrates biological tissues.
Recent work has aimed at modifying the biladiene periphery to drive the tetrapyrroles absorbance profile to the long end of the visible region. In recent work, regioselective bromination of Pd[DMBil1] at the 2- and 18-positions to deliver Pd[DMBilBr2] followed by Sonogashira coupling with aryl alkynes provided a series of biladienes with extended π-systems (see Figure 1 and Scheme 1) [43]. An extended biladiene variant bearing phenyl-alkyne based moieties at the 2- and 18-positions was shown to absorb light out to ~650 nm and sensitized the formation of 1O2 with an improved quantum yield of ΦΔ ~ 0.6. The basic structural motif of the phenyl-alkyne appended biladiene provides a conceptual opportunity for additional modification. As shown in Figure 1, the addition of an unsaturated linker between the ancillary phenyl groups would form a π-conjugated bridge that spans both of the dipyrrin units that comprise the biladiene architecture. This structure, which is structurally reminiscent of the Northrop P-61 Black Widow aircraft, places a 1,8-disubstituted anthracene across the biladiene’s alkyne appendages, giving rise to an extended macrocyclic framework that remains non-aromatic. We hypothesized that the installation of the anthracenyl diyne unit would serve to buttress the biladiene core and provide much greater rigidity to the oligotetrpyrrole scaffold. We envisioned that this structural reinforcement could improve the complex’s triplet excited-state lifetime and engereder a higher ΦΔ than had been observed for previously studied biladienes.
Herein, we report an concise synthetic route to the Pd[DMBil2-P61] complex, which is also subjected to full structural and steady state spectroscopic analysis. These results demonstrate that this new biladiene bearing a dialkynylanthracene bridge at the 2- and 18- pyrrole positions can absorb light in the phototherapeutic window and supports a triplet photochemistry that can be leveraged for PDT and other applications. Additional experiments also demonstrate that Pd[DMBil2-P61] is by far the most efficient biladiene-based photosensitizer for 1O2 that has been prepared and studied to date. The exceptional ability of Pd[DMBil2-P61] to sensitize the formation of 1O2 may well be due to its relatively rigid, macrocyclic structure, which is unique among palladium biladiene complexes studied prior this work.

2. Materials and Methods

All reagents and solvents used for synthesis were purchased from commercial sources (i.e., Sigma, Fisher, Acros, Alfa Aesar, VWR, Oakwood Chemicals, TCI, etc.). All glassware was dried at 150 °C for at least 3 h prior to use. Reactions requiring an inert atmosphere were performed under nitrogen utilizing standard Schlenk techniques. Anhydrous and air free solvents were transferred into reaction vessels via syringe or cannula methods. Solvents for synthesis were of reagent grade or better. Column chromatography was performed using 43-60 mM silica gel from Silicycle. 1,8-diethynylanthracene [44], Pd[DMBil1] [37], and Pd[DMBil1Br2] [43] were each prepared using previously described methods. Spectra for newly synthesized compounds are provided in the Supplementary Materials.

2.1. Compound Characterization

1H, 13C, and 19F NMR spectra were recorded at 25 °C on a Bruker 400 MHz spectrometer with a cryogenic QNP probe. Proton and carbon spectra are referenced to the residual proton signal of the deuterated solvent (CDCl3 = δ 7.26 for 1H, δ 77.16 for 13C). Fluorine spectra are referenced to an external trifluoroacetic acid standard (TFA = δ −76.55 in CD3CN). All chemical shifts are reported in parts-per-million. High-resolution mass spectrometry analyses were performed by the Mass Spectrometry Laboratory in the Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry using High Resolution Electrospray Ionization (ESI) or Liquid Injection Field Desorption Ionization (LIFDI) Mass Spectrometry techniques.
P-61 Black Widow Biladiene Complex (Pd[DMBil-P61]). To a hot 200 mL oven dried Schlenk flas was added 92 mg (0.10 mmol) of Pd[DMBil1Br2], 12 mg (0.10 mmol, 10 mol %) Pd(PPh3)4, 2 mg (0.10 mmol, 10 mol%) CuI, and 70 mg (0.3 mmol) of 1,8-diethynylanthracene. This solid mixture was placed under vacuum for 10 min while it cooled to room temperature, after which 50 mL of anhydrous toluene was added by cannula transfer under nitrogen. To the resulting solution was then added 3.0 mL of triethylamine via syringe. The resulting reaction solution was allowed to stir for 18 h at 100 °C under an atmosphere of N2, after which time, the reaction was cooled to room temperature. The solution was diluted with 100 mL of ethyl acetate and transferred to a separatory funnel. The organic layer was washed sequentially with water and brine, and then dried over sodium sulfate. Following solvent removal via rotary evaporation the product was purified by flash chromatography on silica using 10% dichloromethane in hexanes as the eluent, to deliver 50 mg of the desired product as a purple solid. (51% yield) 1H NMR (600 MHz, Chloroform-d) δ 9.31 (s, 1H), 8.43 (s, 1H), 7.97 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 1H), 7.83 (d, J = 1.4 Hz, 2H), 7.68 (dd, J = 6.9, 1.1 Hz, 2H), 7.43 (dd, J = 8.5, 6.9 Hz, 2H), 6.80 (d, J = 1.3 Hz, 2H), 6.77 (d, J = 4.6 Hz, 2H), 6.66 (d, J = 4.6 Hz, 2H), 1.85 (s, 6H). 13C NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3) δ 167.80, 156.40, 146.01, 144.34, 141.28, 136.95, 136.30, 135.14, 132.45, 132.03, 131.97, 130.50, 129.29, 128.62, 128.48, 128.32, 125.43, 123.97, 121.72, 118.18, 113.99, 111.99, 91.40, 88.97, 77.57, 77.36, 77.15, 42.75, 31.51. 19F NMR (565 MHz, Chloroform-d) δ −138.01–−138.43 (m, 4F), −151.81 (t, J = 20.8 Hz, 2F), −160.57 (td, J = 22.6, 8.2 Hz, 4F).

2.2. X-ray Crystallography

Crystals of Pd[DMBil-P61] were grown by slow evaporation of saturated solutions in a 1:1 solution of dichloromethane and hexanes containing five drops of toluene at room temperature. A crystal suitable for single-crystal X-ray diffraction was selected and mounted using viscous oil onto a plastic mesh and cooled to the data collection temperature. Data were collected on a Bruker-AXS APEX II DUO CCD diffractometer with Cu-Kα radiation (λ = 1.54178 Å) focused with Goebel mirrors. Unit cell parameters were obtained from 48 data frames, 0.5° ω, from different sections of the Ewald sphere.
The unit-cell dimensions, equivalent reflections and systematic absences in the diffraction data are consistent with Cc, and C2/c. The centrosymmetric space group option, C2/c, yielded chemically reasonable and computationally stable results of refinement. The data were treated with multi-scan absorption corrections [45] Structures were solved using intrinsic phasing methods [46] and refined with full-matrix, least-squares procedures on F2 [47]. A disordered, half-occupied hexane solvent molecule which could not be modeled was treated as diffused contributions using Squeeze [48]. Non-hydrogen atoms were refined with anisotropic displacement parameters. Hydrogen atoms were treated as idealized contributions with geometrically calculated positions and with Uiso equal to 1.2 Ueq (1.5 Ueq for methyl) of the attached atom. Atomic scattering factors are contained in the SHELXTL program library. The structures have been deposited at the Cambridge Structural Database under the following CCDC depositary numbers: CCDC 2123257.

2.3. UV-Vis Absorption Experiments

All UV–vis absorbance spectra were collected at room temperature on a StellarNet CCD array UV–vis spectrometer using quartz cuvettes (6Q) with a 1.0 cm path length from Firefly Scientific. Absorption spectra were collected in methanol containing the biladiene sample at concentrations ranging from 4.0–20.0 μM. A 5.0 mM stock solution of Pd[DMBil2-P61] was prepared in ethyl acetate, and diluted in methanol to make a 50 μM stock solution (1:99/ethyl acetate: methanol). This stock solution was used to make the samples of varying biladiene concentration for Beers Law analysis (all of which contained less than 1% ethyl acetate in methanol).

2.4. Emission Experiments

Emission spectra were recorded on an automated Photon Technology International (PTI) QuantaMaser 40 fluorometer equipped with a 75 W xenon arc lamp, an LPS-220B lamp power supply, and a Hamamatsu R2658 photomultiplier tube. Solutions of Pd[DMBil2-P61] were prepared in nitrogen saturated toluene (within an N2-filled glove box) in varying concentrations such that the absorbance value at 500 nm was approximately 0.5 a.u. Samples were excited at λex = 500 nm and emission was scanned from λem = 515 to 1000 nm using a step size of 1 nm, an integration time of 0.25 s. Emission spectra presented herein are averages compiled from five separate scans. Emission data was also collected following exposure of the above samples to air. The caps were removed from the cuvettes, and the spectroscopic samples were allowed to equilibrate with the atmosphere for at least 5 min. The cuvettes were then recapped and shaken to ensure thorough mixing of the air-saturated headspace and solution. Emission scan parameters for the air saturated samples were identical to those recorded under N2.
Emission quantum yields for the samples were calculated using a solution of [Ru(bpy)3][PF6]2 in nitrogen saturated acetonitrile (Φref = 0.094) [49] as a reference. The [Ru(bpy)3][PF6]2 solution was prepared in a 1 cm pathlength quartz cuvette such that its absorbance at 500 nm was approximately 0.5 a.u. The expression below (Equation (1)) was used to determine emission quantum yields:
Φ s = Φ r e f ( I s I r e f ) ( A r e f A s ) ( η s η r e f ) 2
where Φs and Φref are the emission quantum yields of the sample and the reference, respectively. Is and Iref are the integrated emission intensities of the sample and reference. As and Aref refer to the absorbance values recorded for the solutions at λex = 500 nm. Lastly, ηs and ηref are the respective solvent refractive indices for the sample and the reference.

2.5. Singlet Oxygen Experiments

1O2 production was quantified by monitoring the fluorescence quenching of 1,3-diphenylisobenzofuran (DPBF) as a trapping agent for 1O2 [50]. Measurements were carried out on an automated Photon Technology International (PTI) QuantaMaster 40 fluorometer equipped with a 75-W Xenon arc lamp, an LPS-220B lamp power supply and a Hammamatsu R2658 photomultiplier tube using quartz cuvettes (6Q) of 1.0 cm path length. from Firefly Scientific. Each cuvette contained 3.0 mL of methanol solution that was 10.0 μM in biladiene or 10.0 μM methylene blue (used as a reference, Φref = 0.5) [51] and 25.0 μM in DPBF. An additional cuvette containing only methanol and 25.0 μM DPBF was used as a control. Consumption of DPBF was monitored by observing the change in its integrated emission intensity following irradiation with light from an Intralux 9000 light source (Volpi) fitted with a 10 nm (fwhm) bandpass filter centered at 600 nm (Thor Labs, FB600-10). During the studies, each cuvette was irradiated for 5 s intervals for a total of 25 s. DPBF emission spectra were obtained by exciting at λex = 405 nm and scanning from λem = 400–600 nm using a step size of 1 nm and an integration time of 0.25 s.
Calibration curves were generated by increasing the proportion of DPBF to the photosensitizer. Five emission spectra were collected from samples containing 10.0 μM of photosensitizer and 10.0, 20.0, 30.0, 40.0, or 50.0 μM of DPBF. Logarithmic regression fits to the calibration data from each solution enabled the integrated emission intensity values obtained from the 1O2 sensitization experiments to be converted into the corresponding concentrations of unreacted DPBF. A final plot of the concentration of unreacted DPBF versus irradiation time formed a straight line of slope m, which allowed for calculation of the 1O2 quantum yields via Equation (2):
Φ s = Φ r e f ( m s m r e f ) ( ε r e f ε s )
where Φs and Φref are the 1O2 sensitization quantum yields of the sample and the methylene blue reference, respectively; ms and mref are the slopes correlating to the concentration of unreacted DPBF vs. irradiation time plots for the sample and reference; and, εs and εref are the extinction coefficients for the sample and the methylene blue reference at the wavelength of irradiation (λirr = 600 nm). All reported 1O2 quantum yields were obtained from an average of three trials.

3. Results and Discussion

The route employed to prepare Pd[DMBil2-P61] is shown in Scheme 1. Briefly, Pd[DMBil1] was selectively brominated at the 2- and 18- positions using NBS to deliver Pd[DMBil1Br2] in excellent yield. This brominated biladiene was then subjected to Sonogashira coupling with 1,8-diethynylanthracene (prepared separately from 1,8-dibromoanthracene and (triisopropylsilyl)acetylene [44]) in anhydrous toluene at 100 °C, using a Pd(PPh3)4/CuI catalyst system and triethylamine as base. The Sonogashira coupling shown in Scheme 1 yielded the desired Pd[DMBil2-P61] compound in reasonable 51% yield. We did not observe the formation of oligomerized products formed upon addition of multiple dialkynylanthracenes moieties to a single Pd[DMBil1Br2] scaffold. This result suggests that the second Sonogashira coupling required to close the cyclic Pd[DMBil2-P61] framework is fast relative to the first coupling between 1,8-diethynylanthracene and the dibromo-palladium biladiene.
The molecular structure of Pd[DMBil2-P61] was confirmed by single crystal X-ray diffraction studies. The molecular structure of the Black Widow inspired biladiene complex is represented in Figure 2. Despite creating a macrocyclic structure, and imparting greater rigidity to the tetrapyrrole scaffold, the Pd2+ center of Pd[DMBil2-P61] is unable to adopt a true square planar geometry. While the coordination geometry of palladium biladiene complexes often approaches planarity, steric clashing between the α-hydrogens at the biladiene 1- and 19-positions on the open end of the tetrapyrrole distort the geometry of the Pd–N4 core. From a more quantitative standpoint, the geometry index for Pd–N4 coordination of Pd[DMBil2-P61] was determined to τ’4 = 0.1681 [32,52], which is the most distorted from square planar (and toward tetrahedral) of any palladium biladiene complex that has been structurally characterized to date. By contrast, the parent Pd[DMBil1] complex presents a geometry index of τ’4 = 0.109, while other dialkyne appended palladium biladiene complexes displayed geometry indices of τ’4 ~ 0.114–0.135. The average Pd−N bond distances for Pd[DMBil2-P61] were determined to be 2.018 Å, which are very similar to those observed for Pd[DMBil1] and other extended biladiene frameworks.
Upon completing the synthesis and characterization of Pd[DMBil2-P61], we characterized the steady state photochemical and spectroscopic properties of this macrocyclic system. The UV-Vis absorption spectrum for Pd[DMBil2-P61] was recorded in methanol, and is shown in Figure 3a against those of Pd[DMBil1] and a previously reported extended biladiene bearing aryl-alkyne groups at the 2- and 18-positions (Pd[DMBil2-PE]). The extended π-system of Pd[DMBil2-P61] effectively pushes this compound’s light harvesting abilities past those displayed by the parent Pd[DMBil1] complex. More specifically, Pd[DMBil2-P61] absorbs light in the phototherapeutic window to wavelengths as long as ~650 nm and also displays a second strong absorption feature toward the high energy end of the visible region. The main absorption feature is centered at λmax = 520 nm (ε = 43,600 M–1 cm–1) and the weaker local maximum is centered at 437 nm (ε437 = 30,000 M–1cm–1).
Pd[DMBil2-P61] displays attractive light absorption properties for PDT applications as compared to the parent palladium biladiene (Pd[DMBil1]), which does not absorb light in the phototherapeutic window. Comparisons between Pd[DMBil2-P61] and a previously reported extended biladiene derivative (Pd[DMBil2-PE]), akin to that shown on the bottom left of Figure 1, are more nuanced. While the overall shape and absorbance profile of Pd[DMBil2-P61] is nearly identical to that of Pd[DMBil2-PE] (see Figure 3a), the new Black Widow inspired construct does absorb slightly more strongly at its maximum (εmax = 43,600 M–1cm–1 for Pd[DMBil2-P61]; (εmax = 40,900 M–1cm–1 for Pd[DMBil2-PE]). In addition, Pd[DMBil2-P61] also displays a significantly stronger absorption feature toward the high energy end of the visible region compared to both Pd[DMBil1]402 = 19,280 M−1 cm−1) and Pd[DMBil2-PE]414 = 18,300 M–1cm–1). We attribute this increase in absorptivity from ~350–450 nm to the larger conjugated anthracene bridge of Pd[DMBil2-P61], in contrast to the two independent aryl-alkyne units present for Pd[DMBil2-PE].
Previous studies of Pd[DMBil1] have shown that this tetrapyrrole supports a triplet photochemistry and dual emission profiles (i.e., both singlet and triplet emission) [37], and the emission properties of Pd[DMBil2-P61] were probed in N2 saturated toluene. We note that toluene was specifically employed for photoluminescence spectroscopy experiments to avoid aggregation of the extended biladiene architecture in solution. As shown in Figure 3b, Pd[DMBil2-P61] displays a main fluorescence feature centered at λfl = 638 nm. Phosphorescence was also observed as a plateau that spans from λem = 750–850 nm. Upon exposure of the Pd[DMBil2-P61] sample to air, this longer wavelength luminescence was completely quenched (Figure S4), consistent with this feature corresponding to emission from a triplet excited state. Like other previously studied palladium biladiene derivatives, Pd[DMBil2-P61] is weakly luminescent, displaying fluorescence and phosphorescence quantum yields of ΦFl = 3.22 × 10–4 and ΦPh = 5.09 × 10–5, respectively. These values are very similar to those recorded for Pd[DMBil1] as well as other Pd2+ containing biladienes.
The observation that the long-wavelength luminescence observed for Pd[DMBil2-P61] is quenched in the presence of air (vide supra), suggests that the triplet excited-state of this biladiene can be deactivated via energy transfer to molecular oxygen. Accordingly, we evaluated the efficacy with which Pd[DMBil2-P61] sensitizes the formation of 1O2 to assess its potential for use as a PDT agent. Based on prior work, both Pd[DMBil1]Δ = 0.54) and Pd[DMBil2-PE]Δ = 0.59) can sensitize the generation of singlet oxygen with reasonable efficiencies for photomedical applications when irradiated at λex = 500 or 600 nm, respectively. Repetition of such studies for Pd[DMBil2-P61] using methylene blue as an actinometer (ΦΔ = 50%) and 1,3-diphenylisobenzofuran (DPBF) as a 1O2 trapping agent [50] demonstrated that the Black Widow inspired biladiene construct is a potent triplet photosensitizer. Upon irradiation at λex = 600 nm, Pd[DMBil2-P61] was determined to generate singlet oxygen with nearly 85% efficiency (ΦΔ = 0.84 (±0.01)), marking this complex as the most potent biladiene-based 1O2 sensitizer that has been developed to date.
The heightened efficacy with which the Black Widow inspired biladiene generates singlet oxygen is particularly impressive when compared against the aryl-alkyne appended biladiene (Pd[DMBil2-PE]), which is ~25% less efficient at sensitizing the formation of 1O2 upon excitation at 600 nm. The improved quantum yield that is realized upon linking both alkyne appendages via the anthracene bridge of Pd[DMBil2-P61] may be attributed to the heightened rigidity of the macrocyclic architecture (over Pd[DMBil2-PE]). Since the luminescence efficiency of Pd[DMBil2-P61] is very similar to more structurally flexible biladienes that have been previously studied, it is likely that the more rigid anthracene bridged dialkynyl biladiene photosensitizer undergoes vibrational relaxation from the triplet excited state more slowly than other Pd2+ biladienes that have been previously considered. The ability of the rigid Pd[DMBil2-P61] biladiene construct to absorb light in the phototherapeutic window and sensitize the formation of 1O2 with a quantum yield of ~85% highlights the potential of this compound for evaluation as an PDT agent. We note that Pd[DMBil2-P61] sensitizes the formation of 1O2 with efficiencies that rival some of the best porphyrinoid based photosensitizers that have been clinically evaluated as agents of PDT, including Photofrin (ΦΔ = 89%), Foscan (ΦΔ = 87%), Laserphyrin (ΦΔ = 77%), Tookad (ΦΔ = 50%), Redaporphine (ΦΔ = 43%), and Photosens (ΦΔ = 38%) [53,54,55,56].

4. Conclusions and Future Directions

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) holds significant potential as an alternative treatment option for a variety of different cancers and other disease states. To date, much work has been dedicated to the development of new agents for PDT that absorb strongly in the phototherapeutic window and generate significant amounts of singlet oxygen. We have previously reported that biladienes are oligotetrapyrroles that upon coordination to Pd2+ can serve as biocompatible agents of PDT toward triple negative breast cancer cells. While the parent Pd[DMBil1] architecture displays a reasonable 1O2 quantum yield of ΦΔ = 0.54, it must be activated using 500 nm light, which is outside the phototherapeutic window that most deeply penetrates biological tissues.
Synthetic modification of Pd[DMBil1] via introduction of alkynes at the 2- and 18-positions effectively shifts the absorbance profile for this architecture toward the low energy end of the visible region. To this end, a new biladiene framework (Pd[DMBil2-P61]), the structure of which was inspired by the P-61 Black Widow patrol aircraft, places an anthracene bridge across the two alkynes and effectively absorbs light from 600–650 nm. X-ray crystallography confirms the macrocyclic nature of the Pd biladiene complex, which maintains a pseudo-square planar geometry about the metal center. Most notably, in addition to absorbing light capable of penetrating epithelial tissues, Pd[DMBil2-P61] also demonstrated a drastic increase in singlet oxygen generation quantum yield (ΦΔ = 0.84) compared to previously reported Pd2+ biladienes, including those that bear unbridged alkynyl units. When all of these characteristics are taken into consideration, the Black Widow inspired biladiene complex (Pd[DMBil2-P61]) emerges as an attractive candidate for further consideration and study as a potential phototherapeutic agent. We anticipate that future efforts to employ this (and related) biladiene phototherapeutics will require PEGylation of the tetrapyrrole periphery for enhanced solubilization in biological media [40,41,42]. Solubilized biladiene agents will be evaluated for in-vitro efficacy and dark toxicity against various cell lines in culture, and in vivo efficacy using murine tumor models.
The development of Pd[DMBil2-P61] opens doors to many different research directions going forward. Future efforts in our laboratory will focus on synthetically modifying the anthracene bridge of Pd[DMBil2-P61] to further improve the compound’s light absorbing properties in the phototherapeutic window and map the impact that such alterations have on the biladiene’s excited state dynamics. We expect that such efforts may lead to next generation Black Widow inspired PDT agents that can absorb toward the near-IR, while maintaining exceptionally high quantum yields for singlet oxygen sensitization. Our work along these lines will be disclosed in due course.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/photochem2010005/s1, Crystallographic and spectroscopic data. Crystallographic data are also available from the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre (CCDC 2123257).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.T.R. and J.R.; Investigation, A.T.R. and J.R.; Crystallography, G.P.A.Y.; Writing the original draft, A.T.R.; Writing—Review and editing, A.T.R. and J.R.; Funding acquisition, J.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences EPSCoR and Catalysis programs under award no. DESC-0001234.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in the supplementary material.

Acknowledgments

This manuscript is dedicated to David I. Schuster, Professor Emeritus, New York University and Vincent Giglio who worked at Northrop Grumman (manufacturer of the P-61 Black Widow) during the 1990s. Schuster ignited J.R.’s passion for synthesis and photochemistry and Giglio helped shape J.R.’s curiosity, work ethic, and love of learning. This research was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences EPSCoR and Catalysis programs under award no. DESC-0001234. We thank M.I. Martin for preliminary efforts to obtain and solve X-ray diffraction data.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Sample Availability

Samples of the compounds are not available from the authors.

References

  1. Ferreira dos Dantos, A.; Queiroz de Almeida, D.R.; Ferriera Terra, L.; Baptista, M.S.; Labriola, L. Photodynamic therapy in cancer treatment—An update review. J. Cancer Metastasis Treat. 2019, 5, 25. [Google Scholar]
  2. Dolmans, D.; Fukumura, D.; Jain, R. Photodynamic therapy for cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2003, 3, 380–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Dougherty, T.J.; Gomer, C.J.; Henderson, B.W.; Jori, G.; Kessel, D.; Korbelik, M.; Moan, J.; Peng, Q. Photodynamic Therapy. JNCI J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1998, 90, 889–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Dougherty, T.J.; Marcus, S.L. Photodynamic therapy. Eur. J. Cancer 1992, 28, 1734–1742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Miller, J. Photodynamic Therapy: The Sensitization of Cancer Cells to Light. J. Chem. Educ. 1999, 76, 592–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Castano, A.P.; Demidova, T.N.; Hamblin, M.R. Mechanisms in photodynamic therapy: Part one—Photosensitizers, photochemistry and cellular localization. Photodiagnosis Photodyn. Ther. 2004, 1, 279–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Agostinis, P.; Berg, K.; Cengel, K.A.; Foster, T.H.; Girotti, A.W.; Gollnick, S.O.; Hahn, S.M.; Hamblin, M.R.; Juzeniene, A.; Kessel, D.; et al. Photodynamic therapy of cancer: An update. CA A Cancer J. Clin. 2011, 61, 250–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. DeRosa, M.C.; Crutchley, R.J. Photosensitized singlet oxygen and its applications. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2002, 233–234, 351–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Macdonald, I.J.; Dougherty, T.J. Basic principles of photodynamic therapy. J. Porphyr. Phthalocyanines 2001, 5, 105–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Robertson, C.A.; Hawkins Evans, D.; Abrahamse, H. Photodynamic therapy (PDT): A short review on cellular mechanisms and cancer research applications for PDT. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 2009, 96, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Abrahamse, H.; Hamblin, M.R. New photosensitizers for photodynamic therapy. Biochem. J. 2016, 473, 347–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Hamblin, M.R. Photodynamic Therapy for Cancer: What’s Past Is Prologue. Photochem. Photobiol. 2020, 96, 506–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Algorri, J.F.; Ochoa, M.; Roldán-Varona, P.; Rodríguez-Cobo, L.; López-Higuera, J.M. Photo-dynamic Therapy: A Compendium of Latest Reviews. Cancers 2021, 13, 4447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Abdelkarim-Elafifi, H.; Parada-Avendaño, I.; Arnabat-Dominguez, J. Photodynamic Therapy in Endodontics: A Helpful Tool to Combat Antibiotic Resistance? A Literature Review. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 1106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lotufo, M.A.; Tempestini Horliana, A.C.R.; Santana, T.; de Queiroz, A.C.; Gomes, A.O.; Motta, L.J.; Ferrari, R.A.M.; dos Santos Fernandes, K.P.; Bussadori, S.K. Efficacy of Photodynamic Therapy on the Treatment of Herpes Labialis: A Systematic Review. Photodiagnosis Photodyn. Ther. 2020, 29, 101536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Conrado, P.C.V.; Sakita, K.M.; Arita, G.S.; Galinari, C.B.; Gonçalves, R.S.; Lopes, L.D.G.; Lonardoni, M.V.C.; Teixeira, J.J.V.; Bonfim-Mendonça, P.S.; Kioshima, E.S. A Systematic Review of Photodynamic Therapy as an Antiviral Treatment: Potential Guidance for Dealing with SARS-CoV-2. Photodiagnosis Photodyn. Ther. 2021, 34, 102221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Tosa, M.; Ogawa, R. Photodynamic Therapy for Keloids and Hypertrophic Scars: A Review. Scars Burn. Heal. 2020, 6, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Nyman, E.S.; Hynninen, P.H. Research advances in the use of tetrapyrrolic photosensitizers for photodynamic therapy. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 2004, 73, 1–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Diwu, Z.; Lown, J.W. Phototherapeutic potential of alternative photosensitizers to porphyrins. Pharmacol. Ther. 1994, 63, 1–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Dabrowski, J.M.; Pucelik, B.; Regiel-Futyra, A.; Brindell, M.; Mazuryk, O.; Kyziol, A.; Stochel, G.; Macyk, W.; Arnaut, L.G. Engineering of relevant photodynamic processes through structural modifications of metallotetrapyrrolic photosensitizers. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2016, 325, 67–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Pistner, A.J.; Yap, G.P.; Rosenthal, J. A Tetrapyrrole Macrocycle Displaying a Multielectron Redox Chemistry and Tunable Absorbance Profile. J. Phys. Chem. C 2012, 32, 16918–16924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Pistner, A.J.; Lutterman, D.A.; Ghidiu, M.J.; Ma, Y.Z.; Rosenthal, J. Synthesis, electrochemistry, and photophysics of a family of phlorin macrocycles that display cooperative fluoride binding. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 17, 6601–6607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. O’Brien, A.Y.; McGann, J.P.; Geier, G.R., III. Dipyrromethane + dipyrromethanedicarbinol routes to an electron deficient meso-substituted phlorin with enhanced stability. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 11, 4084–4092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Pistner, A.J.; Lutterman, D.A.; Ghidiu, M.J.; Walker, E.; Yap, G.P.A.; Rosenthal, J. Factors Controlling the Spectroscopic Properties and Supramolecular Chemistry of an Electron Deficient 5,5-Dimethylphlorin Architecture. J. Phys. Chem. C 2014, 118, 14124–14132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Kim, D.; Chun, H.-J.; Donnelly, C.C.; Geier, G.R., III. Two-Step, One-Flask Synthesis of a Me-so-Substituted Phlorin. J. Org. Chem. 2016, 81, 5021–5031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Bruce, A.M.; Weyburne, E.S.; Engle, J.T.; Ziegler, C.J.; Geier, G.R., III. Phlorins Bearing Different Substituents at the sp3-Hybridized Meso-Position. J. Org. Chem. 2014, 79, 5664–5672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. LeSaulnier, T.D.; Graham, B.W.; Geier, G.R., III. Enhancement of Phlorin Stability by the In-corporation of meso-Mesityl Substituents. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 5633–5637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Nieto-Pescador, J.; Abraham, B.; Pistner, A.J.; Rosenthal, J.; Gundlach, L. Electronic State Dependence of Heterogeneous Electron Transfer: Injection from the S 1 and S 2 State of Phlorin into TiO2. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2015, 17, 7914–7923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Pistner, A.J.; Martin, M.I.; Yap, G.P.A.; Rosenthal, J. Synthesis, structure, electronic characterization and halogenation of gold(III) phlorin complexes. J. Porphyr. Phthalocyanines 2021, 25, 683–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Flint, D.L.; Fowler, R.L.; LeSaulnier, T.D.; Long, A.C.; O’Brien, A.Y.; Geier, G.R., III. Investigation of Complementary Reactions of a Dipyrromethane with a Dipyrromethanemonocarbinol Leading to a 5-Isocorrole. J. Org. Chem. 2010, 75, 553–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Costa, R.; Geier, G.R., III; Ziegler, C.J. Structure and Spectroscopic Characterization of Free Base and Metal Complexes of 5,5-Dimethyl-10,15-Bis(Pentafluorophenyl)Isocorrole. Dalton Trans. 2011, 40, 4384–4386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Hoffmann, M.; Cordes, B.; Kleeberg, C.; Schweyen, P.; Wolfram, B.; Broring, M. Template Synthesis of Alkyl-Substituted Metal Isocorroles. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2016, 19, 3076–3085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Pomarico, G.; Xiao, X.; Nardis, S.; Paolesse, R.; Fronczek, F.R.; Smith, K.M.; Fang, Y.; Ou, Z.; Kadish, K.M. Synthesis and characterization of free-base, copper, and nickel isocorroles. Inorg. Chem. 2010, 12, 5766–5774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Thomas, K.E.; Beavers, C.M.; Gagnon, K.J.; Ghosh, A. beta-Octabromo- and beta-Octakis(trifluoromethyl)isocorroles: New Sterically Constrained Macrocyclic Ligands. ChemistryOpen 2017, 3, 402–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Martin, M.I.; Cai, Q.; Yap, G.P.A.; Rosenthal, J. Synthesis, Redox, and Spectroscopic Proper-ties of Pd(II) 10,10-Dimethylisocorrole Complexes Prepared via Bromination of Dimethylbila-diene Oligotetrapyrroles. Inorg. Chem. 2020, 59, 18241–18252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Pistner, A.J.; Pupillo, R.C.; Yap, G.P.A.; Lutterman, D.A.; Ma, Y.Z.; Rosenthal, J. Electro-chemical, Spectroscopic and Singlet Oxygen Sensitization Characteristics of 10,10-Dimethylbiladiene Complexes of Zinc and Copper. J. Phys. Chem A 2014, 118, 10639–10648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Potocny, A.; Pistner, A.; Yap, G.; Rosenthal, J. Electrochemical, Spectroscopic, and 1O2 Sensi-tization Characteristics of Synthetically Accessible Linear Tetrapyrrole Complexes of Palladium and Platinum. Inorg. Chem. 2017, 56, 12703–12711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Clara De Simone, B.; Mazzone, G.; Russo, N.; Sicilia, E.; Toscano, M. Metal Atom Effect on the Photophysical Properties of Mg(II), Zn(II), Cd(II), and Pd(II) Tetraphenylporphyrin Complexes Proposed as Possible Drugs in Photodynamic Therapy. Molecules 2016, 21, 1093. [Google Scholar]
  39. Cai, Q.; Rice, A.T.; Pointer, C.A.; Martin, M.I.; Davies, B.; Yu, A.; Ward, K.; Hertler, P.R.; Warndorf, M.C.; Yap, G.P.A.; et al. Synthesis, Electrochemistry and Photophysics of Pd(II) Biladiene Complexes Bearing Varied Substituents at the sp3-Hybridized 10-Position. Inorg. Chem. 2021, 60, 15797–15807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Potocny, A.; Riley, R.; O’Sullivan, R.; Day, E.; Rosenthal, J. Photochemotherapeutic Properties of a Linear Tetrapyrrole Palladium (II) Complex displaying an Exceptionally High Phototoxicity Index. Inorg. Chem. 2018, 57, 10608–10615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Riley, R.S.; O’Sullivan, R.K.; Potocny, A.M.; Rosenthal, J.; Day, E.S. Evaluating Nanoshells and a Potent Biladiene Photosensitizer for Dual Photothermal and Photodynamic Therapy of Triple Negative Breast Cancer Cells. Nanomaterials 2018, 8, 658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Wang, J.; Potocny, A.M.; Rosenthal, J.; Day, E.S. Upconverting Gold Nanoshell- Linear Tetrapyrrole Conjugates for Near Infrared-Activated Dual Photodynamic and Photothermal Therapies. ACS Omega 2020, 5, 926–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Rice, A.T.; Martin, M.I.; Warndorf, M.C.; Yap, G.P.A.; Rosenthal, J. Synthesis, Spectroscopic and 1O2 Sensitization Characteristics of Extended Pd(II) 10,10-Dimethylbiladiene Complexes Bearing Alkynyl-Aryl Appendages. Inorg. Chem. 2021, 60, 11154–11163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Albrecht, F.; Rey, D.; Fatayer, S.; Schulz, F.; Perez, D.; Pena, D.; Gross, L. Intramolecular Coupling of Terminal Alkynes by Atom Manipulation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 22989–22993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Apex3 [Computer Software]; Bruker AXS Inc.: Madison, WI, USA, 2015.
  46. Sheldrick, G.M. SHELXT—Integrated space-group and crystal-structure determination. Acta Cryst. 2015, A71, 3–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Sheldrick, G.M. Crystal structure refinement with SHELXL. Acta Cryst. 2015, C71, 3–8. [Google Scholar]
  48. Spek, A.L. Chemistry and structure in Acta Crystallographica Section C. Acta Cryst. 2015, C71, 9–18. [Google Scholar]
  49. Brouwer, A. Standards for Photoluminescence Quantum Yield Measurements in Solution. Pure Appl. Chem. 2011, 83, 2213–2228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Singh, A.; McIntyre, N.; Koroll, G. Photochemical Formation of Metastable Species from 1,3-Diphenylisobenzofuran. Photochem. Photobiol. 1978, 28, 595–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Tanielian, C.; Wolff, C. Determination of the parameters controlling singlet oxygen production via oxygen heavy-atom enhancement of triplet yields. J. Phys. Chem. 1995, 99, 9831–9837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Okuniewski, A.; Rosiak, D.; Chojnacki, J.; Becker, B. Coordination Polymers and Molecular Structures Among Complexes of Mercury(II) Halides with Selected 1-Benzoylthioureas. Polyhedron 2015, 90, 47–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Ormond, A.B.; Freeman, H.S. Dye Sensitizers for Photodynamic Therapy. Materials 2013, 6, 3817–3840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Correia, J.H.; Rodrigues, J.A.; Pimenta, S.; Dong, T.; Yang, Z. Photodynamic Therapy Review: Principles, Photosensitizers, Applications, and Future Directions. Pharmaceutics 2021, 13, 1332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Bonnett, R. Photosensitizers of the Porphyrin and Phthalocyanine Series for Photodynamic Therapy. Chem. Soc. Rev. 1995, 24, 19–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Pham, T.C.; Nguyen, V.-N.; Choi, Y.; Lee, S.; Yoon, J. Recent Strategies to Develop Innovative Photosensitizers for Enhanced Photodynamic Therapy. Chem. Rev. 2021, 121, 13454–13619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Conceptual strategy to target an extended palladium biladiene complex (Pd[DMBil2-P61]) possessing a conjugated bridge that spans both halves of the tetrapyrrole. This biladiene construct bears structural resemblance to the P-61 Black Widow aircraft.
Figure 1. Conceptual strategy to target an extended palladium biladiene complex (Pd[DMBil2-P61]) possessing a conjugated bridge that spans both halves of the tetrapyrrole. This biladiene construct bears structural resemblance to the P-61 Black Widow aircraft.
Photochem 02 00005 g001
Scheme 1. Methodology employed for synthesis of Pd[DMBil2-P61].
Scheme 1. Methodology employed for synthesis of Pd[DMBil2-P61].
Photochem 02 00005 sch001
Figure 2. Solid-state structure of Pd[DMBil2-P61] shown (a) face on and (b) in profile. Several bonding metrics are highlighted in orange.
Figure 2. Solid-state structure of Pd[DMBil2-P61] shown (a) face on and (b) in profile. Several bonding metrics are highlighted in orange.
Photochem 02 00005 g002
Figure 3. Steady-state spectroscopic properties of Pd[DMBil2-P61]. (a) Comparison of the UV-vis absorbance properties of Pd[DMBil1], Pd[DMBil2-PE], and Pd[DMBil2-P61] in MeOH. (b) UV-vis absorption spectrum (solid-trace) juxtaposed against the normalized luminescence profile recorded for Pd[DMBil2-P61] in toluene under N2.
Figure 3. Steady-state spectroscopic properties of Pd[DMBil2-P61]. (a) Comparison of the UV-vis absorbance properties of Pd[DMBil1], Pd[DMBil2-PE], and Pd[DMBil2-P61] in MeOH. (b) UV-vis absorption spectrum (solid-trace) juxtaposed against the normalized luminescence profile recorded for Pd[DMBil2-P61] in toluene under N2.
Photochem 02 00005 g003
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rice, A.T.; Yap, G.P.A.; Rosenthal, J. A P-61 Black Widow Inspired Palladium Biladiene Complex for Efficient Sensitization of Singlet Oxygen Using Visible Light. Photochem 2022, 2, 58-68. https://doi.org/10.3390/photochem2010005

AMA Style

Rice AT, Yap GPA, Rosenthal J. A P-61 Black Widow Inspired Palladium Biladiene Complex for Efficient Sensitization of Singlet Oxygen Using Visible Light. Photochem. 2022; 2(1):58-68. https://doi.org/10.3390/photochem2010005

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rice, Anthony T., Glenn P. A. Yap, and Joel Rosenthal. 2022. "A P-61 Black Widow Inspired Palladium Biladiene Complex for Efficient Sensitization of Singlet Oxygen Using Visible Light" Photochem 2, no. 1: 58-68. https://doi.org/10.3390/photochem2010005

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop