Next Article in Journal
Mathematical Perspectives on Consumer Spending during a Financial Crisis
Previous Article in Journal
Plato’s Allegory of the ‘Cave’ and Hyperspaces: Sonic Representation of the ‘Cave’ as a Four-Dimensional Acoustic Space via an Interactive Art Application
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Combinatorial Identities with Multiple Harmonic-like Numbers

1
Department of Physics and Engineering Physics, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife 220005, Nigeria
2
Independent Researcher, 72762 Reutlingen, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
AppliedMath 2024, 4(3), 986-998; https://doi.org/10.3390/appliedmath4030053
Submission received: 17 June 2024 / Revised: 5 August 2024 / Accepted: 15 August 2024 / Published: 19 August 2024

Abstract

:
Multiple harmonic-like numbers are studied using the generating function approach. A closed form is stated for binomial sums involving these numbers and two additional parameters. Several corollaries and examples are presented which are immediate consequences of the main result. Finally, combinatorial identities involving harmonic-like numbers and other prominent sequences like hyperharmonic numbers and odd harmonic numbers are offered.

1. Preliminaries

Cheon and El-Mikkawy [1,2] defined multiple harmonic-like numbers as follows:
H n ( m ) = 1 k 1 + k 2 + + k m n 1 k 1 k 2 k m ,
with H n ( 0 ) = 1 for n 0 and H 0 ( m ) = 0 for m 1 . They showed that the generating function of H n ( m ) equals
H ( z ) = n = 0 H n ( m ) z n = ( ln ( 1 z ) ) m 1 z .
For m = 1 , these numbers reduce to harmonic numbers H n as follows:
H n ( 1 ) = 1 k 1 n 1 k 1 = H n , H 0 = 0 .
For m = 2 , we see that
H n ( 2 ) = 1 k 1 + k 2 n 1 k 1 k 2 = j = 1 n k 1 + k 2 = j 1 k 1 k 2 = j = 1 n k 1 = 1 j 1 1 k 1 ( j k 1 ) = j = 1 n 2 j H j 1 = j = 1 n H n j j = H n 2 H n ( 2 ) ,
where, in the last line, a result of Kargin and Can [3] was used and where H n ( 2 ) represents the second-order harmonic numbers, i.e.,
H n ( 2 ) = j = 1 n 1 j 2 .
The brute-force computation of H n ( 3 ) is tedious. The result is
H n ( 3 ) = j = 1 n 1 j l = 1 n j H n j l l .
The next lemma is thus helpful.
Lemma 1. 
For all n 1 and m 0 , we have the identity
H n ( m + 1 ) = j = 1 n H n j ( m ) j .
Proof. 
Using (2), we have
n = 0 H n ( m + 1 ) z n = ( 1 z ) ln ( 1 z ) 1 z ( ln ( 1 z ) ) m 1 z = ( 1 z ) n = 0 H n z n n = 0 H n ( m ) z n = n = 0 j = 0 n H j H n j ( m ) z n n = 1 j = 0 n 1 H j H n 1 j ( m ) z n .
By extracting and comparing the coefficients of z n , we obtain for all n 1
H n ( m + 1 ) = j = 0 n 1 H j H n j ( m ) H n 1 j ( m ) = j = 1 n H n j ( m ) ( H j H j 1 ) = j = 1 n H n j ( m ) j ,
as claimed. □
Multiple harmonic-like numbers were studied recently by Chen and Guo in [4,5]. For instance, in [4], several summation formulae involving harmonic-like numbers and other combinatorial numbers were derived. In the paper presented in [5], a certain sequence A α ( n , k ) was studied, and, as a part of this study, additional interesting combinatorial identities involving harmonic-like numbers were presented.
In this paper, we continue the work on harmonic-like numbers by applying the generating function approach. Our first main result is a closed form for binomial sums involving these numbers and two additional parameters a , b C . Several corollaries and examples are presented, which are immediate consequences of the main result. Finally, combinatorial identities involving harmonic-like numbers and other prominent sequences like hyperharmonic numbers and odd harmonic numbers are offered.
Odd harmonic numbers O n are defined as follows:
O n = k = 1 n 1 2 k 1 , O 0 = 0 .
Obvious relations between harmonic numbers H n and odd harmonic numbers O n are given by calculating
H 2 n = 1 2 H n + O n and H 2 n 1 = 1 2 H n 1 + O n .
Additional relations are contained in the next lemma.
Lemma 2. 
If n is an integer, then
H n 1 / 2 = 2 O n 2 ln 2
H n 1 / 2 H 1 / 2 = 2 O n ,
H n 1 / 2 H 1 / 2 = 2 O n 1 ,
H n + 1 / 2 H 1 / 2 = 2 O n + 1 ,
H n + 1 / 2 H 1 / 2 = 2 O n + 1 1 ,
H n + 1 / 2 H n 1 / 2 = 2 2 n + 1 ,
H n 1 / 2 H 3 / 2 = 2 O n 1 ,
H n + 1 / 2 H 3 / 2 = 2 O n + 1 1 .
Proof. 
Let ψ ( z ) = Γ ( z ) / Γ ( z ) be the psi or digamma function, where Γ ( z ) denotes the Gamma function (see [6]). Then, we have the well-known relation
ψ ( n ) = H n 1 γ ,
with γ being the Euler–Mascheroni constant. The relation in (13) can be seen as a definition of the harmonic numbers for all complex n (excluding zero and the negative integers). Having this in mind, we can use the known result for the digamma function at half-integer arguments ([6], Equation (51)), namely,
ψ ( n + 1 / 2 ) = γ 2 ln 2 + 2 k = 1 n 1 2 k 1 ,
to prove all results stated in the above lemma. For instance, identity (5) follows immediately from combining (13) with (14). Identity (6) is also immediate as H 1 / 2 = 2 ln 2 . The other identities are proven in a very similar manner. □
We conclude this section with a definition of the Stirling numbers of the first kind, s ( n , k ) , that will also be needed in the sequel. These numbers are defined by the following generating function:
Σ k ( z ) = n = k k ! n ! s ( n , k ) z n = ln k ( 1 + z ) .
Some particular values are
s ( n , k ) = 0 for n < k , s ( n , 0 ) = 1 , n = 0 ; 0 , n 1 ; s ( n , 1 ) = ( 1 ) n 1 ( n 1 ) ! s ( n , 2 ) = ( 1 ) n ( n 1 ) ! H n 1 .

2. Binomial Sums Involving H n ( m )

For a , b C , let S n ( a , b , m ) be defined by
S n ( a , b , m ) = k = 0 n n k a k b n k H k ( m ) .
Then, we have the following result.
Theorem 1. 
For all n 0 , we have
S n ( a , b , m ) = j = 0 m m j k = 0 n H k ( j ) ( a + b ) k ( m j ) ! ( n k ) ! ( 1 ) n k b n k s ( n k , m j ) ,
where s ( n , k ) are the Stirling numbers of the first kind.
Proof. 
Let S ( z ) denote the generating function of S n ( a , b , m ) . Then (see [7,8]),
S ( z ) = n = 0 S n ( a , b , m ) z m = 1 1 b z H a z 1 b z .
Substituting 1 a z 1 b z = 1 ( a + b ) z 1 b z , we see that
S ( z ) = 1 1 ( a + b ) z ln ( 1 ( a + b ) z ) + ln ( 1 b z ) m = j = 0 m m j ( ln ( 1 ( a + b ) z ) ) j 1 ( a + b ) z ln m j ( 1 b z )
according to the binomial theorem, where | 1 ( a + b ) z | < 1 , | 1 b z | < 1 . The expression for S n ( a , b , m ) is now obtained from the generating power series (2) and (15) in conjunction with the Cauchy product for power series. This completes the proof of Theorem 1. □
Remark 1. 
When m = 1 , we obtain
S n ( a , b , 1 ) = k = 0 n n k a k b n k H k = k = 0 n ( 1 ) n k ( n k ) ! ( a + b ) k b n k s ( n k , 1 ) + k = 0 n ( 1 ) n k ( n k ) ! H k ( a + b ) k b n k s ( n k , 0 ) = H n ( a + b ) n k = 0 n 1 ( a + b ) k b n k 1 n k ,
which reproduces Boyadzhiev’s main result (Proposition 6) from [9].
Corollary 1. 
For n , m 0 , we have
k = 0 n n k ( 1 ) k H k ( m ) = ( 1 ) n m ! n ! s ( n , m )
and
k = m n n k s ( k , m ) k ! = 1 m ! H n ( m ) .
Proof. 
The first result follows immediately by setting a = 1 and b = 1 in (17) and simplifying the equation accordingly. The second identity is the inverse binomial transform of the first (for information on the binomial transform see [7]). □
Remark 2. 
The identity (19) was first discovered by Chen and Guo (see [5], Corollary 8). The second identity also appears in their paper (albeit with a typo; see the proof of Proposition 13).
Corollary 2. 
For n , m 0 , we have
k = 0 n n k H k ( m ) = j = 0 m m j k = 0 n H k ( j ) ( 1 ) n k 2 k ( m j ) ! ( n k ) ! s ( n k , m j ) .
In particular, we recover the classical identity [9]:
k = 0 n n k H k = 2 n H n k = 1 n 1 2 k k .
Proof. 
Set a = b in (17) and simplify. □
Corollary 3. 
For n 0 , we have
S n ( a , b , 2 ) = H n ( 2 ) ( a + b ) n + 2 k = 1 n ( a + b ) n k b k H k 1 H n k k .
Proof. 
Set m = 2 in (17) and simplify. □
Some consequences of Corollary 3 will now be stated as examples.
Example 1. 
We have
k = 0 n n k H k ( 2 ) = 2 n H n ( 2 ) + 2 k = 1 n H k 1 H n k 2 k k .
Example 2. 
From
k = 0 n n k ( 1 ) k H k ( 2 ) = 2 n H n 1 ,
we deduce that
k = 0 n n k ( 1 ) k H k ( 2 ) = H n n .
To construct the equation above, we used the fact that (see, for instance, [10])
k = 0 n n k ( 1 ) k H k 2 = H n n 2 n 2 .
The inverse binomial relation also yields
k = 1 n n k ( 1 ) k + 1 H k k = H n ( 2 ) .
Example 3. 
We have
k = 0 n n k 2 k ( 1 ) n k H k ( 2 ) = H n ( 2 ) + 2 k = 1 n ( 1 ) k H k 1 H n k k .
Example 4. 
We have
k = 0 n n k 2 k H k ( 2 ) = 3 n H n ( 2 ) + 2 k = 1 n H k 1 H n k 3 k k .
Example 5. 
Let F n and L n be the Fibonacci and Lucas numbers, respectively (see Koshy [11] or Vajda [12]). Then, we have
k = 0 n n k F k H k ( 2 ) = H n ( 2 ) F 2 n + 2 k = 1 n F 2 ( n k ) H k 1 H n k k ,
k = 0 n n k L k H k ( 2 ) = H n ( 2 ) L 2 n + 2 k = 1 n L 2 ( n k ) H k 1 H n k k ,
and
k = 0 n n k ( 1 ) k + 1 F k H k ( 2 ) = H n ( 2 ) F n + 2 k = 1 n F n k H k 1 H n k k ,
k = 0 n n k ( 1 ) k L k H k ( 2 ) = H n ( 2 ) L n + 2 k = 1 n L n k H k 1 H n k k .
Corollary 4. 
For n 0 , we have
S n ( a , b , 3 ) = H n ( 3 ) ( a + b ) n 3 k = 1 n ( a + b ) n k b k H k 1 2 H k 1 ( 2 ) 2 H k 1 H n k + H n k 2 H n k ( 2 ) k .
Proof. 
Set m = 3 in (17) and simplify using
s ( n , 3 ) = 1 2 ( 1 ) n 1 ( n 1 ) ! H n 1 2 H n 1 ( 2 ) .

3. Combinatorial Identities from Partial Summation

For sequences ( a k ) k 0 and ( b k ) k 0 , let Δ a k = a k a k 1 . Then, we have the following well-known partial summation formula:
k = 1 n b k Δ a k + 1 = b n a n + 1 b 0 a 1 k = 1 n a k Δ b k .
In particular, with b k = H k , we obtain
k = 1 n H k ( a k + 1 a k ) = H n a n + 1 k = 1 n a k k .
Remark 3. 
Lemma 1 is also a partial summation identity. Indeed, with a k = H n k ( m ) ( a n = H 0 ( m ) = 0 ) , (35) reads
k = 1 n 1 H k ( H n ( k + 1 ) ( m ) H n k ( m ) ) = k = 1 n 1 H n k ( m ) k
or
k = 1 n 1 H n k ( m ) k = k = 1 n 1 H k ( H n k ( m ) H n 1 k ( m ) ) ,
from which Lemma 1 can be derived easily.
Theorem 2. 
If m and n are non-negative integers, then
k = 1 n H k j = m k k 1 j 1 s ( j , m ) j ! = 1 m ! H n ( m ) H n 1 m ! k = 1 n H k 1 ( m ) k .
Proof. 
Use (35) with a k = H k 1 ( m ) while noting from (20) that
H k ( m ) H k 1 ( m ) = m ! j = m k k 1 j 1 s ( j , m ) j ! .
Setting m = 1 in (36) gives the known result
k = 1 n H k k = 1 2 H n 2 + H n ( 2 ) ,
while m = 2 gives
2 k = 1 n H k j = 1 k ( 1 ) j k 1 j 1 H j 1 j = H n 3 H n ( 2 ) H n k = 1 n H k 1 2 H k 1 ( 2 ) k .
Theorem 3. 
If m and n are positive integers, then
k = 1 n H k j = m n k + 1 n k j 1 s ( j , m ) j ! = 1 m ! H n + 1 ( m + 1 ) .
In particular,
k = 1 n H k n k + 1 = H n + 1 2 H n + 1 ( 2 )
and
k = 1 n H k j = 2 n k + 1 n k j 1 1 j j H j 1 = 1 2 k = 1 n + 1 1 k j = 1 n + 1 k H n k j + 1 j .
Proof. 
Set a k = H n k + 1 m in (35) and use (4) and (37). □
Lemma 3. 
If ( a n ) n 0 is a sequence, then
k = 1 n a k a k 1 k = k = 1 n a k k ( k + 1 ) a 0 + a n n + 1 .
Proof. 
This is a consequence of
1 k 1 k + 1 = 1 k ( k + 1 ) .
Many results can be derived from Lemma 3. For instance, setting a k = H k + p (with p being a real number) gives
k = 1 n H k + p k ( k + 1 ) = H n ( 2 ) H n n + 1 , p = 0 ; H n + H p H n + p p + H p H n + p n + 1 otherwise .
For the equation above, we used the following result:
k = 1 n 1 k ( k + p ) = H n ( 2 ) , p = 0 ; H n + H p H n + p p otherwise .
Theorem 4. 
If m is a non-negative integer and n is a positive integer, then
k = 1 n H n k m k k + 1 = H n m + H n m + 1 H n + 1 m + 1 .
In particular,
k = 1 n H n k k k + 1 = H n + H n 2 H n ( 2 ) H n + 1 2 + H n + 1 ( 2 )
and
k = 1 n H n k 2 H n k ( 2 ) k ( k + 1 ) = H n 2 H n ( 2 ) + k = 1 n 1 k j = 1 n k H n k j j k = 1 n + 1 1 k j = 1 n + 1 k H n + 1 k j j .
Proof. 
Use a k = H n k ( m ) in Lemma 3 and invoke Lemma 1. □
Lemma 4. 
Let ( a n ) n 0 be a sequence. If r is a complex number and n is a non-negative number, then
k = 0 n ( 1 ) k r 1 k ( a k + 1 a k ) = ( 1 ) n r 1 n a n + 1 k = 0 n ( 1 ) k r k a k .
Proof. 
This is a variation on an identity of Kollár ([13], Lemma 1). □
Theorem 5. 
If r is a complex number and m and n are positive integers, then
k = 0 n ( 1 ) k r 1 k j = m k + 1 k j 1 s ( j , m ) j ! = ( 1 ) n r 1 n 1 m ! H n + 1 m 1 m ! k = 0 n ( 1 ) k r k H k m .
In particular,
k = 0 n 1 k k + 1 r 1 k = 1 n r 1 n H n + 1 k = 0 n 1 k r k H k
and
k = 0 n 1 k r 1 k j = 2 k + 1 1 j k j 1 H j 1 j = 1 n r 1 n 1 2 H n + 1 2 H n ( 2 ) 1 2 k = 0 n 1 k r k H k 2 H k ( 2 ) .
Proof. 
Use a k = H k m in Lemma 4. □

4. More Identities Involving H n ( m ) and Other Sequences

Hyperharmonic numbers H n , p (or h n ( p ) ), p 1 , are another generalization of harmonic numbers [14,15,16]. They are defined by
H n , p = i = 1 n H i , p 1 with H n , 0 = 1 n , H 0 , p = 0 , H n , 1 = H n .
They can be written in the compact form as
H n , p + 1 = n + p n ( H n + p H p ) , p = 0 , 1 , 2 , ,
and possess the following generating function ([16], Equation (5) or [3], Equation (2)):
n = 0 H n , p + 1 z n = ln ( 1 z ) ( 1 z ) p + 1 , | z | < 1 .
Theorem 6. 
For all n , p , m 0 , we have
k = 0 n k + p k H n k ( m ) ( H k + p H p ) = k = 0 n k + p k H n k ( m + 1 ) .
In particular,
k = 0 n k + p k ( H k + p H p ) = k = 0 n k + p k H n k
and
k = 0 n k + p k H n k ( H k + p H p ) = k = 0 n k + p k H n k 2 H n k ( 2 ) .
Proof. 
Let B ( z ) be the generating function of H n , p + 1 . We can then calculate
H ( z ) · B ( z ) = n = 0 H n ( m ) z n n = 0 H n , p + 1 z n = n = 0 k = 0 n H k ( m ) H n k , p + 1 z n = ( ln ( 1 z ) ) m 1 z ln ( 1 z ) ( 1 z ) p + 1 = 1 ( 1 z ) p + 1 ( ln ( 1 z ) ) m + 1 1 z = n = 0 n + p n z n n = 0 H n ( m + 1 ) z n = n = 0 k = 0 n k + p k H n k ( m + 1 ) z n
and the statement follows. □
The next lemma provides a relation between hyperharmonic numbers and odd harmonic numbers.
Lemma 5. 
If p and r are non-negative integers, then
H r , p + 1 / 2 = 1 2 2 r 1 2 p p 1 2 ( r + p ) r + p r + p r O r + p O p .
Proof. 
Identity (7) gives
H r + p 1 / 2 H r 1 / 2 = 2 O r + p O p .
Using this and
r + p 1 / 2 r = 1 2 2 r 2 p p 1 2 ( r + p ) r + p r + p r
in (52) gives (56). □
Theorem 7. 
If n and p are non-negative integers, then
k = 1 n 1 2 2 k 2 k + p k + p k + p k O k + p O p = 1 2 2 n + 1 p + 1 2 p + 1 2 n + p + 1 n + p + 1 n + p + 1 n O n + p + 1 O p + 1 .
In particular,
k = 1 n O k 2 2 k 2 k k = n + 1 2 2 n + 1 2 ( n + 1 ) n + 1 O n + 1 1 .
Proof. 
Write p + 1 + 1 / 2 for p in (51) to obtain
k = 1 n H k , p + 1 / 2 = H n , ( p + 1 ) + 1 / 2 ,
and use (56). □
Theorem 8. 
For all n , m 0 we have
k = 0 n 2 k k O k H n k ( m ) 4 k = 1 2 k = 0 n 2 k k H n k ( m + 1 ) 4 k .
In particular,
k = 0 n 2 k k O k 4 k = 1 2 k = 0 n 2 k k H n k 4 k
and
k = 0 n 2 k k O k H n k 4 k = 1 2 k = 0 n 2 k k 1 4 k H n k 2 H n k ( 2 ) .
Proof. 
We use the fact that [17,18]
n = 0 2 n n z n = 1 1 4 z .
It is also known that [17]
O ( z ) = n = 0 2 n n O n z n = 1 2 1 4 z ln ( 1 4 z ) 1 4 z .
This yields
O ( z ) · H ( 4 z ) = n = 0 k = 0 n 2 k k O k 4 n k H n k ( m ) z n = 1 2 1 4 z ( ln ( 1 4 z ) ) m + 1 1 4 z = 1 2 n = 0 2 n n z n n = 0 H n ( m + 1 ) 4 n z n = 1 2 n = 0 k = 0 n 2 k k 4 n k H n k ( m + 1 ) z n
and the proof is completed. □
Note that from (60) and (62), we also have
k = 0 n 2 k k H n k 2 2 k = n + 1 2 2 n 2 ( n + 1 ) n + 1 O n + 1 1 .
The next theorem, based on Theorem 6, generalizes Theorem 8.
Theorem 9. 
If n and p are non-negative integers, then
k = 0 n 1 2 2 k 2 ( k + p ) k + p k + p k H n k m O k + p O p = 1 2 k = 0 n 1 2 2 k 2 ( k + p ) k + p k + p k H n k m + 1 .
In particular, setting m = 0 and using (59) gives the following generalization of (64):
k = 0 n 1 2 2 k 2 ( k + p ) k + p k + p k H n k = 1 2 2 n p + 1 2 p + 1 2 n + p + 1 n + p + 1 n + p + 1 n O n + p + 1 O p + 1 .
Proof. 
Write p 1 / 2 for p in (53) and use (57) and (58). □
Lemma 6. 
If ( a n ) n 0 is a sequence, then
k = 1 n k ( a k a k 1 ) = n a n k = 1 n a k 1 .
Theorem 10. 
If n N 0 and p C Z , then
k = 1 n k H k , p = n H n , p + 1 H n 1 , p + 2 .
Proof. 
Identity (52) gives the following recurrence relation:
H k , p + 1 H k 1 , p + 1 = H k , p .
Use a k = H k , p + 1 in Lemma 6, keeping (68) in mind. □
Theorem 11. 
If n and p are non-negative integers, then
k = 1 n k 2 2 k 2 ( k + p ) ( k + p ) k + p k O k + p O p = n 2 2 n 2 ( p + 1 ) p + 1 1 2 p p 2 ( n + p + 1 ) n + p + 1 n + p + 1 n O n + p + 1 O p + 1 1 2 2 n 2 2 ( p + 2 ) p + 2 1 2 p p 2 ( n + p + 1 ) n + p + 1 n + p + 1 n 1 O n + p + 1 O p + 2 .
In particular,
k = 1 n k 2 2 k 2 k k O k = n ( n + 1 ) 2 2 n + 1 2 ( n + 1 ) n + 1 O n + 1 1 n ( n + 1 ) 2 2 n 3 2 ( n + 1 ) n + 1 O n + 1 4 3 .
Proof. 
Write p + 1 / 2 for p in (67) and use (56). □
Theorem 12. 
If n and p are non-negative integers, then
k = 1 n 2 k k 1 2 ( k + p ) k + p k + p k O k + p O k = 1 4 2 n n 1 2 n + p + 1 n + p + 1 n + p + 1 n O n + p + 1 O n 1 4 2 p + 1 p + 1 O p + 1 .
Proof. 
Rearrange (68), interchange k and p, and write k + 1 / 2 for k to obtain
H p , k + 1 / 2 = H p + 1 , k + 1 / 2 H p + 1 , k 1 / 2 ,
which telescopes to give
k = 1 n H p , k + 1 / 2 = H p + 1 , n + 1 / 2 H p + 1 , 1 / 2 ,
from which (71) follows, in view of (56). □

5. Conclusions

In this study, we offer new contributions to the field of combinatorics of multiple harmonic-like numbers. To prove most of the main results, the generating function approach was applied, making the derivations concise and easily accessible. We have also revealed connections between harmonic-like numbers, hyperharmonic numbers, and odd harmonic numbers. In the future, it would be interesting to explore combinatorial identities involving harmonic-like numbers and other prominent sequences of numbers (and polynomials), such as Catalan numbers, Lah numbers, Bernoulli numbers, Euler numbers, or Genocchi numbers [19,20,21,22]. Recall that Catalan numbers C n are given by
C n = 2 n n 1 n + 1 , 0 n ,
whereas the (unsigned) Lah numbers L ( n , k ) can be expressed by the following formula:
L ( n , k ) = n 1 k 1 n ! k ! , 1 k n .
Bernoulli numbers B n , Euler numbers E n , and Genocchi numbers G n are defined by their respective generating functions:
x e x 1 = n = 0 B n x n n ! , 2 e x e 2 x + 1 = n = 0 E n x n n ! , 2 x e x + 1 = n = 1 G n x n n ! .
Studying relations between multiple harmonic-like numbers and these sequences could be an interesting task for future research.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.A. and R.F.; methodology, K.A. and R.F.; writing—original draft preparation, R.F.; writing—review and editing, K.A. and R.F.; All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the three reviewers for their interest in this work and for their constructive criticism. In particular, the authors are indebted to Reviewer 1, who reminded them about the partial summation identity.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Cheon, G.S.; El-Mikkawy, M.E.A. Generalized harmonic number identities and a related matrix representation. J. Korean Math. Soc. 2007, 44, 487–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Cheon, G.S.; El-Mikkawy, M.E.A. Generalized harmonic numbers with Riordan arrays. J. Number Theory 2008, 128, 413–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kargin, L.; Can, M. Harmonic number identities via polynomials with r-Lah coefficients. Comptes Rendus Math. Acad. Sci. Paris 2020, 358, 535–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Chen, Y.; Guo, D. Formulae concerning multiple harmonic-like numbers. Contrib. Math. 2023, 8, 24–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Chen, Y.; Guo, D. Summation formulas for certain combinatorial sequences. Mathematics 2024, 12, 1210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Srivastava, H.M.; Choi, J. Series Associated with the Zeta and Related Functions; Springer Science+Media, B.V.: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  7. Boyazhiev, K.N. Notes on the Binomial Transform; World Scientific: Singapore, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  8. Prodinger, H. Some information about the binomial transform. Fibonacci Quart. 1994, 32, 412–414. [Google Scholar]
  9. Boyadzhiev, K.N. Harmonic number identities via Euler’s transform. J. Integer Seq. 2009, 12, 09.6.1. [Google Scholar]
  10. Adegoke, K.; Frontczak, R. Some notes on an identity of Frisch. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2405.10978. [Google Scholar]
  11. Koshy, T. Fibonacci and Lucas Numbers with Applications; Wiley-Interscience: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  12. Vajda, S. Fibonacci and Lucas Numbers, and the Golden Section: Theory and Applications; Dover Press: Mineola, NY, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  13. Kollár, R. Incomplete finite binomial sums of Harmonic numbers. J. Integer Seq. 2024, 27, 24.2.1. [Google Scholar]
  14. Boyadzhiev, K.N.; Frontczak, R. Hadamard product of series with special numbers. Funct. Approx. Comment. Math. 2023, 68, 231–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Coppo, M.A.; Young, P.T. On shifted Mascheroni series and hyperharmonic numbers. J. Number Theory 2016, 169, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Dil, A.; Boyadzhiev, K.N. Euler sums of hyperharmonic numbers. J. Number Theory 2015, 147, 490–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Chen, H. Interesting series associated with central binomial coefficients, Catalan numbers and harmonic numbers. J. Integer Seq. 2016, 19, 16.1.5. [Google Scholar]
  18. Gould, H.W. Combinatorial Identities, A Standardized Set of Tables Listing 500 Binomial Coefficient Summations, Revised Edition; National Security Agency: Morgantown, WV, USA, 1972. [Google Scholar]
  19. Peralta, D.; Quintana, Y.; Wani, S.A. Mixed-type hypergeometric Bernoulli–Gegenbauer polynomials. Mathematics 2023, 11, 3920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chu, W. Further identities on Catalan numbers. Discrete Math. 2018, 341, 3159–3164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Daboul, S.; Mangaldan, J.; Spivey, M.Z.; Taylor, P.J. The Lah numbers and the nth derivative of e1/x. Math. Mag. 2013, 86, 39–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wang, X.; Chu, W. Reciprocal relations of Bernoulli and Euler numbers/polynomials. Integral Transform. Spec. Funct. 2018, 29, 831–841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Adegoke, K.; Frontczak, R. Combinatorial Identities with Multiple Harmonic-like Numbers. AppliedMath 2024, 4, 986-998. https://doi.org/10.3390/appliedmath4030053

AMA Style

Adegoke K, Frontczak R. Combinatorial Identities with Multiple Harmonic-like Numbers. AppliedMath. 2024; 4(3):986-998. https://doi.org/10.3390/appliedmath4030053

Chicago/Turabian Style

Adegoke, Kunle, and Robert Frontczak. 2024. "Combinatorial Identities with Multiple Harmonic-like Numbers" AppliedMath 4, no. 3: 986-998. https://doi.org/10.3390/appliedmath4030053

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop