Optimizing Solar-Integrated Microgrid Design for Sustainable Rural Electrification: Insights from the LEOPARD Project
Abstract
:1. Introduction
- Accurate load profiling: Estimating energy demands in rural settings is complex due to variable consumption patterns and seasonal fluctuations. For instance, agricultural activities such as irrigation and crop processing significantly increase electricity demand during planting and harvesting seasons, while household consumption may peak in the evenings when lighting and cooking appliances are used [3].
- System scalability: expanding microgrids to accommodate growing energy needs without sacrificing efficiency remains a technical hurdle [4].
- Environmental factors: dust accumulation and thermal stress severely impact PV system performance, especially in arid and tropical climates [2].
- Economic barriers: high upfront costs and limited access to financing hinder adoption, particularly in low-income communities [5].
- Load profiling and energy demand estimation: Accurate load profiling is vital for reliable microgrid operations. Sanfilippo et al. (2023) demonstrated how inaccuracies in demand estimation affected system efficiency in the Leveraging Energy Optimization for Adaptable Renewable Deployment (LEOPARD) project [3]. Falk et al. (2021) emphasized dynamic load modeling’s importance, highlighting socio-economic challenges in implementing microgrids in rural Tanzania [9].
- Operational strategies for efficiency: Optimizing energy flow and load balancing is critical for long-term microgrid performance. Arévalo et al. (2024) explored artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance energy efficiency through predictive control [10]. Ding et al. (2020) introduced temperature-dependent battery degradation models that improved reliability and reduced maintenance costs [11]. Hybrid systems combining solar PV with backup energy sources, such as diesel generators or wind energy, demonstrated increased reliability and cost efficiency [12].
- Environmental challenges and solutions: Dust accumulation and thermal stress significantly reduce PV performance in rural settings. Predictive maintenance approaches, including advanced data analytics and real-time condition monitoring, have been shown to mitigate these environmental effects, improving system efficiency and reliability [13]. Studies have shown that dust deposition can lead to efficiency losses of 10–40%, depending on environmental conditions and the frequency of cleaning [14]. Similarly, excessive heat can reduce PV module efficiency by approximately 0.4–0.5% per °C increase in temperature above the standard test condition (STC) of 25 °C [15]. Kamal et al. (2022) emphasized predictive maintenance to mitigate these effects [2]. Recent innovations, such as self-cleaning coatings and automated maintenance systems, have shown promise in maintaining PV efficiency under harsh conditions [16].
- Economic sustainability of microgrid systems: High deployment costs are a barrier in low-resource settings. Nasir et al. (2020) demonstrated the cost-effectiveness of DC microgrid architectures for rural electrification [4]. Falk et al. (2021) highlighted community engagement and public–private partnerships as successful models to reduce financial barriers [9,17].
- Economic optimization: Minimize the Levelized Cost of Electricity (LCOE) through optimized system design, operational efficiency, and financing mechanisms like public–private partnerships and community solar models. Reducing costs, improving energy dispatch, and enhancing storage performance are key. Subsidy integration further lowers financial barriers [9].
- Scalability and replicability: provide a replicable framework adaptable to similar rural contexts, ensuring lessons learned inform future deployments across Africa and other developing regions [4].
- Case study scope: The Songhai Center integrates solar PV technology with components such as battery storage and diesel generators to evaluate the following:
- -
- Microgrid performance under varying solar irradiance and load conditions.
- -
- Environmental impacts on PV efficiency, such as temperature fluctuations.
- -
- Load balancing strategies to ensure reliability.
- Broader implications: The findings provide a replicable framework for rural and off-grid energy solutions, offering
- -
- Insights into system optimization, including load estimation and quality control;
- -
- Recommendations for economic sustainability via innovative financing models.
- Contribution to global energy goals: By addressing rural electrification challenges, this study aligns with global efforts to
- -
- Reduce energy poverty in underserved regions;
- -
- Promote low-carbon solutions to mitigate climate change;
- -
- Empower communities through sustainable energy systems.
2. Methodology
2.1. Project Scope and Demonstrator Location
- Geographical location: the center’s location offered abundant solar energy potential [3].
- Diverse energy demands: mixed-use energy loads facilitated testing under real-world conditions.
- Environmental challenges: thermal stress and dust accumulation provided conditions reflective of microgrid challenges in West Africa [11].
- Seasonal stability: The steady variation in solar energy ensures predictable PV system performance, allowing for effective system sizing and design optimization. This stability supports long-term operational reliability, even during less favorable months.
- Energy storage opportunities: High solar irradiation during peak months allows for surplus energy to be stored, which can be utilized during periods of lower irradiation. This facilitates load balancing and ensures an uninterrupted energy supply, reducing the need for diesel backup systems.
- Environmental benefits: By leveraging the region’s abundant solar resource, diesel generator usage can be minimized, significantly reducing greenhouse gas emissions and aligning with sustainability goals.
2.2. Technical Framework
2.2.1. Modeling and Predictive Tools for Optimization
- Modeling components such as PV arrays, inverters, batteries, and diesel generators.
- Sensitivity analyses for parameters like grid length, population size, and renewable energy share.
- Optimization using advanced meta-heuristics via the OptQuest solver to improve efficiency.
- Simulation and modeling: MEMOGRID evaluates real-world constraints and decision variables to analyze system behavior under different conditions. The optimization process employs meta-heuristic algorithms through OptQuest, allowing efficient search and decision-making in complex, multi-variable energy models. This approach ensures accurate feasibility assessments and enhances system resilience.
- Optimization and Decision Support: The tool focuses on multiple key aspects of microgrid operations:
- -
- Resource allocation: determines optimal PV, battery, and diesel generator configurations.
- -
- Load balancing: ensures stable energy distribution under varying demand conditions.
- -
- Predictive analytics: forecasts energy generation and consumption trends to minimize lost energy.
- Outputs include the optimal system design (PV and battery size), diesel usage percentage, yearly diesel input, lost energy, and LCOE calculations.
- Environmental factors: temperature and solar irradiation data.
- Load characteristics: energy demand profiles from household, commercial, and public sector consumers.
- Technical specifications: PV panel efficiency, battery capacity, and inverter performance.
- Economic considerations: investment and maintenance costs, lifespan, and financial discount rates.
- Optimization requirements: constraints such as maximum uncovered demand and the acceptable percentage of diesel usage.
- Predictive modeling: simulation of different microgrid configurations under real-world scenarios.
- Iterative optimization: refining system parameters to improve performance.
- Optimal PV and battery sizing to meet energy demand.
- Diesel percentage and total yearly diesel consumption.
- Levelized Cost of Electricity (LCOE) and lost energy assessments.
2.2.2. Load Profile Estimation
- Identification of population clusters and energy demands using geospatial data.
- Network length estimations for specific rural sites [4].
- Application of clustering and pathfinding algorithms to group buildings and determine optimal network layouts.
2.2.3. Solar Irradiation Data from EU PVGIS
- Accurate PV array performance modeling under varying solar conditions.
- Sensitivity analyses for optimal microgrid sizing and energy production.
2.2.4. Economic Feasibility and LCOE
- : capital expenditures.
- : operational expenditures.
- : annual energy output.
- r: discount rate.
- d: degradation rate.
- T: project lifespan.
- is the cost of photovoltaic modules (EUR per kW);
- is the cost of battery energy storage systems (EUR per kWh);
- represents the cost of inverters and other power electronics;
- includes labor, grid connection, and site preparation costs.
- includes routine servicing, monitoring, and predictive maintenance.
- accounts for periodic replacement of batteries and inverters based on lifespan.
- applies to diesel backup systems if integrated.
2.2.5. CO2 Emission Reduction
- : the total amount of CO2 emissions avoided by using solar energy instead of diesel generators;
- : solar energy produced by the microgrid (in kWh);
- : CO2 emission factor of diesel generators (in kg CO2/kWh), typically ranging from 0.27 to 0.35 kg CO2/kWh, depending on generator efficiency and fuel type.
2.2.6. Integration of GIS, Microgrid Optimization, and Economic Assessment
- Phase 1—LENI Tool: The Load Estimation and Network Identification (LENI) tool utilizes GIS-based clustering and pathfinding algorithms to identify potential microgrid sites by estimating network lengths and population clusters.
- Phase 2—MEMOGRID and LCOE Tools: The MEMOGRID tool optimizes system sizing and operational strategies based on environmental, technical, and economic inputs, ensuring a minimal LCOE. The LCOE tool then evaluates financial viability by integrating cost and operational data to determine the feasibility of identified sites.
3. System Design and Optimization
3.1. PV System Configuration
- Technology selection: Key components were integrated to ensure efficient energy generation and storage:
- PV modules: JAsolar 455 Wc monocrystalline panels with 20% efficiency and high-temperature performance.
- Charge controllers: Victron MPPT RS 450/100-Tr controllers (3 units) for optimal power point tracking.
- Battery storage: BYD Lithium Batteries (15.4 kWh each) offering 95% efficiency and a 6000-cycle lifespan.
- Inverters: Victron Quattro 48V/10kVA (3 units) and Fronius SYMO grid inverters with 98.1% efficiency.
- Container Design and Housing: The system was housed in a 20 ft container to ensure modularity, protection, and ease of deployment. Features included removable frames for rapid setup of PV arrays (Table A1).This design choice played a crucial role in system optimization by enhancing both scalability and operational efficiency. The container
- -
- Provided a controlled environment for protecting PV system components against harsh environmental conditions, ensuring long-term reliability;
- -
- Enabled a plug-and-play approach, allowing for quick installation and deployment in remote or off-grid locations;
- -
- Facilitated replicability and scalability, as standardized modular units could be easily transported and integrated into various microgrid configurations.
Additionally, the compact and standardized form factor allowed for efficient logistics and deployment, reducing setup time and labor costs. The connection between container sizing and system efficiency is particularly relevant in replicability studies, where transportability and ease of integration are key factors in designing scalable microgrid solutions. - Environmental impact mitigation: Strategies addressed dust accumulation, temperature effects, and shading:
- -
- Regular cleaning and potential use of self-cleaning coatings to minimize dust impact [26].
- -
- Temperature management to maintain panel and battery efficiency.
- -
- Shading minimization through optimized spatial design.
3.2. System Optimization Strategies
- Algorithms for efficiency improvement: Predictive control and machine learning models optimized energy flow and balance loads:Theenergy flow diagram (Figure 6) illustrates the implementation of these control strategies. Predictive control and real-time monitoring ensured efficient distribution of energy sources, reducing dependence on diesel and maximizing renewable energy utilization.
- Battery management: BYD batteries were central to energy reliability:
- -
- Optimized charge/discharge cycles extended battery lifespan [11].
- -
- Peak shaving reduced diesel reliance during high-demand periods.
- -
- State of Charge (SOC) management maintained optimal battery operation (20–80% SOC range).
The energy flow diagram highlights the central role of batteries in storing excess PV energy and reducing diesel reliance. Battery SOC management ensures system stability and prolongs component lifespan. - Diesel backup integration: Diesel engines provided supplementary power when solar generation was insufficient:
- -
- Hybrid energy management prioritized renewables, minimizing diesel runtime [28].
- -
- Predictive activation reduced fuel consumption by triggering diesel engines only during critical SOC thresholds.
As shown in Figure 6, diesel backup was only activated when both PV generation and battery storage were insufficient, minimizing runtime and fuel consumption.
3.3. Energy Balancing and Operational Considerations
- Real-time monitoring: Sensors continuously monitored solar irradiance and system performance, informing operational adjustments [28].
- Load prioritization: Critical loads were prioritized during low-generation periods, ensuring uninterrupted supply.
- Hybrid energy integration: Combining PV, battery, and diesel systems ensured reliability and reduced emissions.
4. Replicability
- Relevant input data: Table 1 summarizes the CAPEX and OPEX costs for photovoltaic (PV) systems, batteries, and diesel generators in Benin and Senegal.
- -
- Benin:
- *
- Social data: included building distribution by customer type, population density estimates, and clustering analyses.
- *
- Technical data: CAPEX for PV systems (EUR 397.28/kW), batteries (EUR 385.97/kWh), and diesel generators (EUR 224.40/kW) tailored to local conditions.
- *
- Economic data: operational costs were EUR 0.198/kWh annually for renewable systems and EUR 0.107/kWh for diesel fuel, with an 8% discount rate.
- -
- Senegal:
- *
- Social data: cluster-specific load profiles for villages ranging from 200 to 1000 households.
- *
- Technical data: higher CAPEX for PV systems (EUR 450/kW) and diesel generators (EUR 300/kW). Battery CAPEX remained the same as in Benin (EUR 385.97/kWh).
- *
- Economic data: operational costs were similar to those in Benin, with an annual cost of EUR 0.198/kWh for renewable systems. However, higher diesel dependency increased annual expenses.
The battery prices in both Benin and Senegal remained the same because they were sourced from a standardized procurement process, ensuring uniform pricing across different locations. However, the CAPEX for PV systems and diesel generators differed due to local market conditions, import taxes, and supply chain logistics. Similarly, the OPEX for PV and batteries appeared identical due to comparable maintenance needs and degradation rates over time. While PV arrays require periodic cleaning and inverter maintenance, battery systems undergo capacity degradation and replacement cycles, leading to similar long-term operational costs. This assumption was validated through cost modeling and real-world microgrid operation data. - Geographical replicability: The LENI tool identified potential replication sites in Benin and Senegal (Figure 7). Key findings included the following:
- -
- Benin: Without subsidies, 144 sites were economically viable for replication. A 30% CAPEX subsidy increased this to 196 sites.
- -
- Senegal: Without subsidies, 43 sites were viable. A 30% subsidy increased this to 296 sites, while a 40% subsidy further raised the total to 321 sites.
- Economic replicability: Economic analyses revealed how microgrid feasibility varied across different regions due to cost dynamics and infrastructural constraints.
- -
- Benin: the LCOE ranged from EUR 0.40 to EUR 0.47/kWh, primarily influenced by grid length and population size. Figure 8 shows that the LCOE decreased slightly as population size increased, though variability remained due to site-specific conditions. Grid length had a minor impact on the LCOE, indicating that shorter distances between settlements led to more consistent costs.
- -
- Senegal: the LCOE averaged EUR 0.48/kWh, affected by a higher CAPEX and diesel dependency. Figure 9 demonstrates that the LCOE increased with grid length, as longer networks required higher infrastructure investment. Population size did not significantly reduce the LCOE, likely due to higher initial costs and operational constraints.
Comparison and key insights: Figure 8 and Figure 9 illustrate different cost trends in Benin and Senegal:- -
- In Benin, the LCOE remained relatively stable with respect to grid length, whereas in Senegal, longer grid networks resulted in higher costs.
- -
- Higher population density in Benin led to a lower LCOE, while in Senegal, diesel dependency limited cost reductions even with larger population sizes.
- -
- Senegal exhibited greater cost variability, likely due to a higher CAPEX and reliance on fossil fuel backup systems.
- -
- Benin’s LCOE remained below Senegal’s average (EUR 0.48/kWh), suggesting that microgrid replication may be more cost-effective in Benin under similar conditions.
This analysis highlights how geographical, infrastructural, and economic factors shape microgrid feasibility, emphasizing the need for region-specific optimization strategies. - Sensitivity analysis: As shown in Figure 10, the sensitivity analysis evaluated the impact of CAPEX subsidies and diesel share on economic feasibility:
- -
- Benin: Increasing the diesel share from 14% to 25% added 51 viable sites, expanding the total to 195. A 30% CAPEX subsidy slightly increased this to 196 sites.
- -
- Senegal: A 30% subsidy raised the number of viable sites from 43 to 296, while a 40% subsidy added 25 more sites, totaling 321.
5. Conclusions
- Performance optimization:
- -
- Integration of solar PV systems achieved energy conversion efficiencies exceeding 95%.
- -
- The system supplied between 50% and 80% of daily energy demands, with an average output of 184 kWh/day under optimal conditions.
- -
- Energy storage maintained an efficiency of 88%, ensuring consistent power availability during periods of low solar irradiance.
- Economic feasibility:
- -
- The Levelized Cost of Electricity (LCOE) was reduced to EUR 0.47/kWh, significantly lower than diesel-based alternatives.
- -
- Operational costs were lowered by decreasing diesel dependency by 65%, resulting in annual savings of EUR 0.198/kWh compared to diesel operations.
- Environmental sustainability:
- -
- The reduction in diesel usage prevented 10.16 tons of CO2 emissions within the first 150 operational days, supporting regional sustainability objectives.
- -
- Annual CO2 savings are projected to exceed 25 tons with continued maintenance and optimization.
5.1. Broader Impacts
- Community empowerment: The project provides stable, affordable electricity, enabling enhanced access to education, healthcare, and economic opportunities, thus fostering socio-economic development.
- Alignment with global goals: The initiative aligns with the Paris Agreement’s climate action targets, promoting renewable energy adoption in Sub-Saharan Africa while fostering European–African collaboration.
- Scalability and replicability: The system’s modular and adaptable design offers a scalable blueprint for similar rural settings. Its architecture allows for flexible expansion by integrating additional PV arrays, battery storage, and hybrid energy sources based on site-specific requirements. Additionally, predictive analytics and geospatial modeling tools assist in identifying suitable locations, ensuring technical feasibility. This framework has already demonstrated viability, with 296 sites in Senegal and 196 in Benin identified as potential replication candidates under subsidized conditions.
5.2. Challenges and Recommendations
- Technical challenges:
- -
- Enhance load profile accuracy using dynamic modeling to address demand variability.
- -
- Mitigate environmental impacts, such as dust accumulation and thermal stress, through hydrophobic and self-cleaning coatings (e.g., TiO2-based nanocoatings) that reduce dust deposition and thermally insulating materials that minimize heat-induced performance losses [29]. Additionally, predictive maintenance strategies utilizing infrared thermography and AI-driven fault detection enhance system longevity and efficiency [30,31]. Recent studies highlight the role of predictive maintenance in reducing PV inefficiencies, ensuring early fault detection and proactive maintenance scheduling [32].
- Economic barriers: Expand access to subsidies and financial incentives, such as a 30% CAPEX subsidy, to enhance economic feasibility for additional deployment sites.
- Scalability: Develop flexible system architectures to accommodate diverse energy demands, environmental conditions, and hybrid integration with other renewable sources like wind energy.
5.3. Future Directions
- Technology integration:
- -
- Incorporate IoT-based monitoring for real-time diagnostics and system performance optimization.
- -
- Explore hybrid systems integrating wind energy and other renewable sources to diversify energy generation.
- Policy and collaboration:
- -
- Strengthen European–African partnerships to drive innovation and adoption of renewable energy technologies.
- -
- Advocate for supportive policies, including CAPEX subsidies and carbon credits, to accelerate widespread adoption.
- Research opportunities:
- -
- Conduct longitudinal studies to assess long-term system performance and socio-economic benefits.
- -
- Investigate novel materials and technologies to improve efficiency and durability in challenging environmental conditions.
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
LEOPARD | Leveraging Energy Optimization for Adaptable Renewable Deployment |
LEAP-RE | Long-term Joint European and African Partnership on Renewable Energy |
EU | European Union |
SSA | Sub-Saharan Africa |
IEC | International Electrotechnical Commission |
MEMOGRID | Microgrid Modeling Optimization and Performance Assessment Tool |
LENI | Load Estimation and Network Identification Tool |
WHO | World Health Organization |
IRENA | International Renewable Energy Agency |
NREL | National Renewable Energy Laboratory |
RS | Renewable Subsystem |
RES | Renewable Energy Source |
LCOE | Levelized Cost of Electricity |
CAPEX | Capital expenditure |
OPEX | Operating expenditure |
PPA | Power Purchase Agreement |
PV | Photovoltaic |
MPPT | Maximum Power Point Tracking |
AI | Artificial intelligence |
GIS | Geographical Information System |
MG | Microgrid |
DC | Direct Current |
AC | Alternating Current |
SOC | State of Charge (Battery charge level) |
BESS | Battery Energy Storage System |
LFP | Lithium Iron Phosphate (battery type) |
BMS | Battery Management System |
EMS | Energy Management System |
IoT | Internet of Things |
EV | Electric Vehicle |
DER | Distributed Energy Resource |
GHI | Global Horizontal Irradiance |
DHI | Diffuse Horizontal Irradiance |
V2G | Vehicle-to-Grid |
OPC | Operating Performance Condition |
STC | Standard test condition |
Appendix A
Appendix A.1
Specification | Details | Unit |
---|---|---|
Container’s Sizing | ||
Length | 6060 | mm |
Width | 2440 | mm |
Height | 2590 | mm |
Features | ||
Container type | Standard 20 ft container | – |
Building frame | Removable and dismantled (roof arrangement) | – |
LEOPARD Prototype Validation | ||
Target commissioning time | 3–5 | h |
Tare weight | 2.3 | t |
Transportation | Trucks | – |
Parameter | Value | Unit |
---|---|---|
78 Modules of PV Panel: JAM72S20–460/MR | ||
Type | Crystalline Silicon | – |
Rater maximum power | 460 | W |
Maximum power voltage | 50 | V |
Maximum power current | 9.2 | A |
Efficiency | 20 | % |
3 Units of Charge Controller: Victron MPPT RS 450/100-Tr | ||
Maximum input voltage | 450 | V |
Maximum output current | 100 | A |
Nominal battery voltage | 48 | V |
Efficiency | 98 | % |
Communication interface | VE.Can and VE.Direct | – |
3 Units of Inverter/Charger: Victron Quattro 48V/10kVA | ||
Input voltage | 48 | V |
Continuous power output | 10,000 | VA |
Peak power | 20,000 | VA |
Efficiency | 96 | % |
AC output | Dual output (split phase) | – |
Communication interface | VE.Bus, VE.Can, VE.Direct | – |
Grid Inverters: Fronius SYMO 8.2-3-M and SYMO 6.0-3-M | ||
Maximum output power | 8.2/6.0 | kW |
AC output voltage | 230/400 | V |
Maximum efficiency | 98.1 | % |
MPPT voltage range | 150–800 | V |
Communication interface | Ethernet, WLAN | – |
3 Batteries: BYD Lithium Battery 15.4 kWh | ||
Capacity | 15.4 | kWh |
Nominal voltage | 48 | V |
Cycle life | 6000 | cycles |
Efficiency | 95 | % |
Operating temperature | −10 to 50 | °C |
References
- Silinto, B.F.; van der Laag Yamu, C.; Zuidema, C.; Faaij, A.P. Hybrid renewable energy systems for rural electrification in developing countries: A review on energy system models and spatial explicit modelling tools. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2025, 207, 114916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kamal, M.M.; Mohammad, A.; Ashraf, I.; Fernandez, E. Rural electrification using renewable energy resources and its environmental impact assessment. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 86562–86579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sanfilippo, S.; Cabrera, J.H.; Évora, J.; Kébé, C.M.F.; Kremers, E.; Péchiné, B.; Cardot, J.S.; Rachid, A.; Tossa, A.K.; Lekoto, J.; et al. Microgrid design optimization in Benin within the LEOPARD project: Evaluating the impact of inaccurate load profile estimation. In Proceedings of the 2023 3rd International Conference on Electrical, Computer, Communications and Mechatronics Engineering (ICECCME), Canary Islands, Spain, 19–21 July 2023; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Nasir, M.; Iqbal, S.; Khan, H.A.; Vasquez, J.C.; Guerrero, J.M. Sustainable rural electrification through solar PV DC microgrids—An architecture-based assessment. Processes 2020, 8, 1417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karekezi, S. Renewables in Africa—Meeting the energy needs of the poor. Energy Policy 2002, 30, 1059–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- World Bank. Solar Mini Grids Could Sustainably Power 380 Million People in Africa by 2030—If Action is Taken Now. 2023. Available online: https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2023/02/26/solar-mini-grids-could-sustainably-power-380-million-people-in-afe-africa-by-2030-if-action-is-taken-now (accessed on 17 December 2024).
- Moner-Girona, M.; Bender, A.; Becker, W.; Bódis, K.; Szabó, S.; Kararach, A.G.; Anadon, L.D. A multidimensional high-resolution assessment approach to boost decentralised energy investments in Sub-Saharan Africa. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2021, 148, 111282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bender, A.; Moner-Girona, M.; Becker, W.; Bódis, K.; Szabó, S.; Kararach, A.G.; Anadon, L.D. Dataset for multidimensional assessment to incentivise decentralised energy investments in Sub-Saharan Africa. Data Brief 2021, 37, 107265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Falk, J.; Angelmahr, M.; Schade, W.; Schenk-Mathes, H. Socio-economic impacts and challenges associated with the electrification of a remote area in rural Tanzania through a mini-grid system. Ecol. Environ. 2021, 6, 513–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arévalo, P.; Ochoa-Correa, D.; Villa-Ávila, E. Optimizing Microgrid Operation: Integration of Emerging Technologies and Artificial Intelligence for Energy Efficiency. Electronics 2024, 13, 3754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ding, Y.; Vijay, A.; Neal, D.; McCulloch, M. Predictive Control of Rural Microgrids with Temperature-dependent Battery Degradation Cost. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Europe, Virtual, 26–28 October 2020; pp. 509–513. [Google Scholar]
- Nejad, M.F.; Radzi, M.A.M.; Ab Kadir, M.Z.A.; Hizam, H. Hybrid renewable energy systems in remote areas of equatorial countries. In Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE Student Conference on Research and Development (SCOReD), Pulau Pinang, Malaysia, 5–6 December 2012; pp. 11–16. [Google Scholar]
- Ledmaoui, Y.; El Maghraoui, A.; El Aroussi, M.; Saadane, R. Review of Recent Advances in Predictive Maintenance and Cybersecurity for Solar Plants. Sensors 2025, 25, 206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hussain, A.; Batra, A.; Pachauri, R. An experimental study on effect of dust on power loss in solar photovoltaic module. Renewables Wind. Water Sol. 2017, 4, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shaker, L.M.; Al-Amiery, A.A.; Hanoon, M.M.; Al-Azzawi, W.K.; Kadhum, A.A.H. Examining the influence of thermal effects on solar cells: A comprehensive review. Sustain. Energy Res. 2024, 11, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, A.; Yadav, A.; Sinha, S. Hybrid Power Systems: Solution to Rural Electrification. Curr. Sustain. Energy Rep. 2022, 9, 77–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- United States Department of Energy. Microgrid and Integrated Microgrid Systems Program Report. 2022. Available online: https://www.energy.gov/oe/articles/microgrid-and-integrated-microgrid-systems-program-report-download (accessed on 17 December 2024).
- European Commission Joint Research Centre. Photovoltaic Geographical Information System (PVGIS). 2024. Available online: https://joint-research-centre.ec.europa.eu/photovoltaic-geographical-information-system-pvgis_en (accessed on 19 December 2024).
- Rituraj, G.; Oritz, J.; Ficarelli, N.; Mouli, G.C.; Rodden, P.; Martell, C.; Vallve, X.; Bauer, P. Evaluation of Software Tools for Standalone Microgrid Design and Optimization; IEA International Energy Agency: Paris, France, 2024. [Google Scholar]
- Zhu, X.; Ruan, G.; Geng, H.; Liu, H.; Bai, M.; Peng, C. Multi-objective sizing optimization method of microgrid considering cost and carbon emissions. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 2024, 60, 5565–5576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kraft, J.; Luh, M. Dimensioning Microgrids for Productive Use of Energy in the Global South–Considering Demand Side Flexibility to Reduce the Cost of Energy. Energies 2022, 15, 7500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chhlonh, C.; Alvarez-Herault, M.C.; Vai, V.; Raison, B. Low-Voltage Microgrid Planning Strategies for an Isolated Village—A Case Study in Cambodia. In Proceedings of the IECON 2023–49th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, Singapore, 16–19 October 2023; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Vera, E.G.; Canizares, C.; Pirnia, M. Integration of renewable energy sources for low emission microgrids in Canadian remote communities. arXiv 2022, arXiv:2207.13092. [Google Scholar]
- Jakhrani, A.Q.; Rigit, A.R.H.; Othman, A.K.; Samo, S.R.; Kamboh, S.A. Estimation of carbon footprints from diesel generator emissions. In Proceedings of the 2012 International Conference on Green and Ubiquitous Technology, Jakarta, Indonesia, 30 June –1 July 2012; pp. 78–81. [Google Scholar]
- Hasan, S.; Hazari, M.R.; Jahan, E.; Mannan, M.A. Design optimization of a grid-tied microgrid for a residential community in southern Bangladesh. Clean Energy 2023, 7, 1300–1315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qin, J.; Lu, H. A review of self-cleaning coatings for solar photovoltaic systems: Theory, materials, preparation, and applications. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2023, 30, 91591–91616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Muqeet, H.A.; Javed, H.; Akhter, M.N.; Shahzad, M.; Munir, H.M.; Nadeem, M.U.; Bukhari, S.S.H.; Huba, M. Sustainable solutions for advanced energy management system of campus microgrids: Model opportunities and future challenges. Sensor 2022, 22, 2345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mahdi, B.S.; Sulaiman, N.; Abd Shehab, M.; Shafie, S.; Hizam, H.; Hassan, S.L.M. Optimization of Operating Cost and Energy Consumption in a Smart Grid. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Electrical, Computer and Energy Technologies, Sydney, Australia, 25–27 July 2024; pp. 1–7. [Google Scholar]
- Fujishima, A.; Rao, T.N.; Tryk, D.A. Titanium dioxide photocatalysis. J. Photochem. Photobiol. C Photochem. Rev. 2000, 1, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bagavathiappan, S.; Lahiri, B.B.; Saravanan, T.; Philip, J.; Jayakumar, T. Infrared thermography for condition monitoring—A review. Infrared Phys. Technol. 2013, 60, 35–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yin, C.M. Application of Artificial Neural Networks to Condition Monitoring; University of Aberdeen: Aberdeen, UK, 1993. [Google Scholar]
- Bosman, L.B.; Leon-Salas, W.D.; Hutzel, W.; Soto, E.A. PV system predictive maintenance: Challenges, current approaches, and opportunities. Energies 2020, 13, 1398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Component | Benin CAPEX (EUR) | Senegal CAPEX (EUR) | OPEX (EUR/kWh/Year) |
---|---|---|---|
PV | 397.28 | 450.00 | 0.198 |
Battery | 385.97 | 385.97 | 0.198 |
Diesel generator | 224.40 | 300.00 | 0.110 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Rachid, A.; Korkut, T.B.; Cardot, J.-S.; Kébé, C.M.F.; Ndiaye, A.; Sinsin, L.M.; Fifatin, F.X. Optimizing Solar-Integrated Microgrid Design for Sustainable Rural Electrification: Insights from the LEOPARD Project. Solar 2025, 5, 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/solar5010009
Rachid A, Korkut TB, Cardot J-S, Kébé CMF, Ndiaye A, Sinsin LM, Fifatin FX. Optimizing Solar-Integrated Microgrid Design for Sustainable Rural Electrification: Insights from the LEOPARD Project. Solar. 2025; 5(1):9. https://doi.org/10.3390/solar5010009
Chicago/Turabian StyleRachid, Ahmed, Talha Batuhan Korkut, Jean-Sebastien Cardot, Cheikh M. F. Kébé, Ababacar Ndiaye, Léonide Michael Sinsin, and François Xavier Fifatin. 2025. "Optimizing Solar-Integrated Microgrid Design for Sustainable Rural Electrification: Insights from the LEOPARD Project" Solar 5, no. 1: 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/solar5010009
APA StyleRachid, A., Korkut, T. B., Cardot, J.-S., Kébé, C. M. F., Ndiaye, A., Sinsin, L. M., & Fifatin, F. X. (2025). Optimizing Solar-Integrated Microgrid Design for Sustainable Rural Electrification: Insights from the LEOPARD Project. Solar, 5(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/solar5010009