Next Article in Journal
Andean Ancient Grains: Nutritional Value and Novel Uses
Previous Article in Journal
Development of a Stacking-Based Ensemble Machine Learning for Detection of Depression in Parkinson’s Disease: Preliminary Research
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Investigating the Distribution of Foraging Habitat for Loggerhead Sea Turtles, Caretta caretta, in the Mediterranean Sea †

by
Vasiliki Almpanidou
1,*,
Anastasia Chatzimentor
1,
Vasiliki Tsapalou
1,2 and
Antonios D. Mazaris
1
1
Department of Ecology, School of Biology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
2
Groningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences, University of Groningen, 9712 CP Groningen, The Netherlands
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 1st International Electronic Conference on Biological Diversity, Ecology and Evolution, 15–31 March 2021; Available online: https://bdee2021.sciforum.net/.
Biol. Life Sci. Forum 2021, 2(1), 27; https://doi.org/10.3390/BDEE2021-09423
Published: 12 March 2021

Abstract

:
A better understanding of the habitat distribution of highly migratory marine megafauna xand its potential exposure to anthropogenic activities is essential for its effective protection. Here, we deliver a comprehensive view on the distribution of suitable foraging habitat for the representatives of marine megafauna, loggerheads, Caretta caretta, in the Mediterranean Sea, along with an assessment on their exposure to fisheries. Using the available published satellite tracking information on the adult Mediterranean foraging loggerheads, we built a series of distribution models to develop a map of the foraging habitat across the basin. We also assessed the exposure of the delineated foraging grounds to the cumulative risk due to different types of fisheries. Our findings revealed that the neritic foraging habitat of adult loggerheads extended over 9% of the Mediterranean Sea. We identified well-established areas in the central Mediterranean Sea but also sites, in the western part, for which current knowledge was restricted. The exposure of the foraging habitat to fisheries differed across the basin, with the Adriatic Sea showing the highest level of risk. The developed approach, combining modeling techniques and risk assessment, allowed the identification of critical sites for loggerheads on which conservation actions should focus.

1. Introduction

Marine megafauna represents a key component of marine ecosystems [1]. This iconic group of species consists of highly mobile animals, which inhabit different habitats that might be very distant [2]. Thus, they are extremely prone to various anthropogenic activities that could threaten the robustness of their populations [3]. Sea turtles, representatives of the charismatic marine megafauna, are migratory species characterized by an incredible dispersal performance; they use distinct areas for different life-history stages, with adult individuals travelling between foraging and breeding areas [4]. Still, our knowledge regarding the spatial distribution of suitable foraging grounds at a wide scale and the potential exposure of these habitats to human-related pressures is rather scarce [5], especially compared to their well-studied breeding activities [6].
The Mediterranean Sea is a regional entity that encompasses a specific population of loggerhead sea turtles with distinct biogeographical, demographic, and genetic characteristics [7]. Even though several local studies have been conducted in the basin focusing on foraging loggerheads (e.g., [8]), a systematic approach to consolidate the available data is still missing (but see [9,10] for baseline approaches in this direction). Information gaps regarding the distribution of suitable foraging areas at the basin scale raise further difficulties in achieving a better understanding of the vulnerability of the species due to anthropogenic activities in these habitats and hamper our capacity to design proper conservation measures [11]. For example, in the Mediterranean Sea, fisheries have been considered a major threat for loggerheads, with over 132,000 incidents of bycatch recorded on a yearly basis, leading to an estimation of more than 44,000 deaths per year [9,12]. Therefore, it is essential to assess to what extent the foraging grounds of the Mediterranean loggerhead population are subjected to this type of risk.
In the current study, we develop and provide a comprehensive systematic approach for elucidating the distribution of suitable foraging habitat for loggerhead sea turtles across the Mediterranean Sea. To do so, we created a thorough database with all the available tracking data for adult foraging animals published in the literature for the basin. Next, based on this information, we built a series of species distribution models so as to deliver a map of suitable foraging habitat delineated in the region. To improve our understanding of the potential impact of fisheries on these habitats, we also conducted an assessment of their exposure to the combined risk due to different types of fishing gears (i.e., longline, trawling, fixed net and purse seine fisheries). The proposed approach could contribute to the determination of key foraging areas and “hotspots” of fisheries risk to inform management and research priorities for loggerhead sea turtles in the Mediterranean region.

2. Methods

To collect all the available information on foraging sea turtles in the Mediterranean Sea, we conducted a systematic literature review, searching Google Scholar and using the terms “sea turtles” or “marine turtles”, “satellite telemetry”, and “Mediterranean”. From the sources identified (by July 2020), we extracted all locations of foraging adult loggerheads. We focused on sources that explicitly referred to adult animals and also retained individuals with curve carapace length > 66.5 cm, which is the mean lowest reported size for nesting females in the Mediterranean region [9]. We also excluded individuals that had been subjected to rehabilitation prior to release. We finally collected and digitized 119 presence locations of foraging turtles (Figure 1).
To determine current climatic conditions, we used climatic data on sea surface temperature (SST) for the Mediterranean Sea from the Centro Euro-Mediterraneo sui Cambiamenti Climatici (CMCC) [14], provided on a daily basis for 1950–2100, at a 0.0625° spatial resolution. To capture the most representative time period of foraging activity in the region, we used SSTs from September to March [5]. Based on these data, we built and used for the subsequent analyses a set of four bioclimatic variables [15] over the period 1991–2020: mean diurnal range, temperature range of the 7-month study period, temperature seasonality, and minimum temperature of the coldest month.
We applied an ensemble modelling approach [16] to develop a map of suitable foraging grounds across the Mediterranean region, using the sdm package for R [17] and fitting four different algorithms (i.e., generalized linear models, generalized additive models, random forest, and multivariate adaptive regression spline). We generated 10 different sets of 1000 pseudo-absences and applied a 10-fold cross-validation procedure to examine the predictive accuracy of the models. We also used two alternative evaluation metrics for the final ensemble, the area under the curve (AUC) [18] and true skill statistics (TSS) [19].
To transform the continuous model output to a binary distribution map, with 0 representing absence and 1 presence, we used the threshold that maximizes TSS as a cut-off value [20]. Given that the majority of the Mediterranean adult loggerheads forage within the neritic zone [21], we used a depth of 200 m as a threshold for distinguishing the most frequently used neritic foraging habitat from the oceanic habitat, based on bathymetry data derived from the General Bathymetric Chart of the Oceans (GEBCO) [22]. To further examine the distribution of foraging grounds across the Mediterranean Sea, we calculated the proportion of foraging area that was included within the seven marine ecoregions [13] found in the basin (Figure 1).
To evaluate the exposure of loggerhead foraging habitat to risk due to fisheries, we considered fishing effort from four types of fishing gears for which sea turtles have been reported as susceptible to bycatch incidents [12], namely, longline, trawling, fixed net, and purse seine fisheries. We obtained data on global fishing effort from the Global Fishing Watch (GFW) website [23,24], provided at 0.01° spatial resolution, on a daily basis for 2012–2016, by gear type and flag state, based on the Automatic Identification System (AIS) used by industrial fishing vessels. We calculated the annual fishing effort (fishing hours per year) for the most recent available year (2016) by estimating the sum of all the daily information for each gear type within a cell of 0.0625° × 0.0625° resolution, to be compatible with the output of the distribution model. It should be noted that data might be limited in specific regions (e.g., Northern Africa, Western Asia) because of poor coverage of AIS, while small, artisanal vessels were not included in the dataset [24].
To assess the cumulative risk derived from the different types of fishing gears on Mediterranean foraging grounds, we relied on the approach proposed by Sequeira et al. [25]. Thus, we first calculated the risk for each threat separately and then estimated the cumulative risk by adding the values of all the threats for each cell. We ranked the risk values across the Mediterranean within five classes with an equal number of features (i.e., very low, low, medium, high, very high), based on their distribution. Finally, we estimated to what extent the foraging grounds were exposed to the cumulative risk of fisheries in the entire basin and in the different marine ecoregions.

3. Results

The developed model was considered to exhibit a very good predictive capacity for the determination of suitable foraging habitat for adult Mediterranean loggerheads, based on the estimated evaluation metrics (i.e., AUC = 0.83, TSS = 0.7).
We found that the proposed neritic foraging habitat covered about 9% of the entire Mediterranean basin (i.e., ~217,000 km2; Figure 1). The largest percentage of this area was located in the Central and Eastern Mediterranean. More specifically, in the Central Mediterranean, the Tunisian Plateau and the Adriatic Sea hosted 31.75% and 24% of the total foraging area of the basin, respectively. In the Eastern Mediterranean, the Levantine Sea and parts of the Aegean Sea encompassed notable percentages of foraging habitat for loggerhead turtles (19.19% and 13.05% of the total area, respectively). The extent of foraging habitat was found to be more restricted in the Western Mediterranean (7.13% of the total foraging area), mainly located along the French and Spanish coasts. We also found that the oceanic part of the foraging habitat of adult loggerheads covered about 4% of the Mediterranean Sea (i.e., ~98,000 km2). This habitat was located mainly in the central (i.e., 34.07% and 18.30% of the total area in the Aegean and Ionian Seas, respectively) and eastern (i.e., 31.50% of the total area in the Levantine Sea) parts of the basin, adjacent to the neritic habitat.
Assessing the combined risk due to different types of fishing gears, we found that more than 40% (i.e., 40.94%) of the neritic foraging habitat was exposed to medium up to very high levels of threat, with variations being detected across the Mediterranean Sea (Figure 2).
The neritic foraging habitat enclosed within the Adriatic Sea, in the Central Mediterranean, was seriously affected by fisheries, with 85.87% of its extent being subjected to medium to very high risk. Moreover, 87.89% of the neritic foraging grounds hosted within the Western Mediterranean were also found to be under medium to very high levels of threat. More than 50% of the foraging habitat hosted within the Aegean and Ionian Seas was exposed to medium to very high levels of risk (54.38% and 51.52% of the foraging area, respectively), with lower percentages being detected in the Levantine Sea and the Tunisian Plateau/Gulf of Sidra. Regarding the oceanic foraging habitat, the areas within the Aegean Sea were found to be the most impacted by fisheries, with 36.40% of their extent being subjected to medium to very high levels of exposure. We would like to mention that the results within the Levantine Sea and the Tunisian Plateau/Gulf of Sidra should be interpreted with caution because of the poor coverage of fisheries data.

4. Discussion

Here, we delivered an integrated picture of the distribution of suitable foraging habitat for adult loggerhead sea turtles across the Mediterranean Sea. Our findings demonstrated well-established foraging areas, which are located at the Central Mediterranean, such as the Northern Adriatic Sea and the Gulf of Gabes, in Tunisia. The significance of these areas for the Mediterranean loggerhead population as their main foraging sites has been previously supported, with high abundance of individuals being detected in these regions (e.g., [26,27]). We also found a remarkable coverage of foraging habitat in the eastern part of the basin, in the Aegean and Levantine Seas, which are known to be frequently inhabited by loggerhead sea turtles [9]. Still, our findings highlighted foraging areas in the Western Mediterranean, such as those located in the Gulf of Lion, France, and in parts of the Spanish coast, for which satellite telemetry data from adult loggerheads are missing. However, evidence derived from other sources (e.g., aerial surveys [28], bycatch data [29]) have implied the potential important role of these areas as alternative or complementary foraging grounds for adult loggerheads across the Mediterranean Sea, further supporting our findings. Therefore, we suggest that research and conservation initiatives should be also directed towards these sites in order to ensure the persistence of the Mediterranean loggerhead population.
Our findings also revealed that loggerhead sea turtles might experience increased cumulative risk from the different types of fishing gears in the Mediterranean foraging habitat, raising doubts regarding the robustness of the population across the basin. Such results are in accordance with the incredible number of captures per year that have been conservatively estimated for the basin [9,12]. In the Adriatic Sea, more than 24,000 bycatch incidents and about 4500 deaths occur on a yearly basis, rendering the region a hotspot of risk for loggerhead turtles [30], as it was also highlighted by our analyses. Notably large numbers of capture events (~20,000) have been also recorded in Spain, in the Western Mediterranean and Aegean Sea, in the Eastern part of the basin [12]. Recent studies revealed an extensive effect of fishing activities on sea turtles that are located in Spanish waters [31], while an increased frequency of interactions between fishermen and sea turtles have been observed both in Greece [32] and Turkey [33], with all of the above-mentioned regions being identified as the most exposed to risk due to fisheries. The ecoregions of Tunisian Plateau/Gulf of Sidra and Levantine Sea were found to be under lower risk due to fisheries. Still, poor data coverage for countries on northern African coasts and Western Asia [24] could have resulted in downgrading the problem in these regions; thus, we recommend that these results should be interpreted with caution. Bycatch has been also recognized as a major problem worldwide for all sea turtle species [34]. For example, trawl fishery has been identified as the main source of mortality for neritic adult loggerheads in the southwest Atlantic region [35] and the top-ranked threat for all the sea turtle species hosted in Mozambican waters [36]. Despite many attempts to mitigate the consequences of fisheries bycatch (e.g., through awareness campaigns for fishermen and adaptations of fishing tools [12]), the problem persists, highlighting the necessity to enhance trans-boundary and multidisciplinary collaborations for establishing appropriate measures and strengthening the conservation efforts for sea turtles.

5. Conclusions

The current study, compiling a consolidated database with published satellite tracking data and applying an ensemble distribution modeling approach, provides profound knowledge on the distribution of suitable foraging habitat for loggerhead sea turtles across the entire Mediterranean basin. We determined suitable foraging habitat for loggerheads using SST, which has been considered an important factor for the distribution of sea turtles (e.g., [37]). Still, we acknowledge that several other environmental (e.g., benthic habitat cover, ocean currents, primary productivity [38]) and behavioral variables (e.g., site fidelity [39]) could also impact the distribution of foraging habitat. In addition, the development of a risk index that incorporated several types of fisheries allowed us to assess the exposure of the proposed foraging habitat to different levels of threat and to identify critical regions for which potential interventions should be considered. Therefore, we suggest that, building on the spatial information derived from our analyses, additional fine-scale assessments should be conducted so as to provide specific guidelines for effective protection and conservation of the habitats of loggerhead sea turtles.

Author Contributions

V.A. and A.D.M. conceived the study; V.A. and A.D.M. developed the data-analysis approach. V.A. and V.T. collected the data; V.A., A.C. and V.T. performed the analyses; V.A. led the writing of the paper with contributions from all authors. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was co-financed by Greece and the European Union (European Social Fund—ESF) through the Operational Programme “Human Resources Development, Education and Lifelong Learning” in the context of the project “Reinforcement of Postdoctoral Researchers—2nd Cycle” (MIS-5033021), implemented by the State Scholarships Foundation (ΙΚΥ).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data needed to evaluate the conclusions of the paper are presented in the paper. Additional data related to this paper may be requested from the authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Estes, J.A.; Heithaus, M.; McCauley, D.J.; Rasher, D.B.; Worm, B. Megafaunal impacts on structure and function of ocean ecosystems. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 2016, 41, 83–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Pimiento, C.; Leprieur, F.; Silvestro, D.; Lefcheck, J.; Albouy, C.; Rasher, D.; Davis, M.; Svenning, J.-C.; Griffin, J. Functional diversity of marine megafauna in the Anthropocene. Sci. Adv. 2020, 6, eaay7650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Hays, G.C.; Ferreira, L.C.; Sequeira, A.M.; Meekan, M.G.; Duarte, C.M.; Bailey, H.; Bailleul, F.; Bowen, W.D.; Caley, M.J.; Costa, D.P.; et al. Key questions in marine megafauna movement ecology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2016, 31, 463–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Hays, G.C.; Scott, R. Global patterns for upper ceilings on migration distance in sea turtles and comparisons with fish, birds and mammals. Funct. Ecol. 2013, 27, 748–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Rees, A.F.; Margaritoulis, D.; Newman, R.; Riggall, T.E.; Tsaros, P.; Zbinden, J.A.; Godley, B.J. Ecology of loggerhead marine turtles Caretta caretta in a neritic foraging habitat: Movements, sex ratios and growth rates. Mar. Biol. 2013, 160, 519–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Rees, A.F.; Alfaro-Shigueto, J.; Barata, P.; Bjorndal, K.A.; Bolten, A.B.; Bourjea, J.; Broderick, A.; Campbell, L.; Cardona, L.; Carreras, C.; et al. Are we working towards global research priorities for management and conservation of sea turtles? Endanger. Species Res. 2016, 31, 337–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Wallace, B.P.; DiMatteo, A.D.; Bolten, A.B.; Chaloupka, M.Y.; Hutchinson, B.J.; Abreu-Grobois, F.A.; Mortimer, J.A.; Seminoff, J.A.; Amorocho, D.; Bjorndal, K.A.; et al. Global conservation priorities for marine turtles. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e24510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Luschi, P.; Mencacci, R.; Cerritelli, G.; Papetti, L.; Hochscheid, S. Large-scale movements in the oceanic environment identify important foraging areas for loggerheads in central Mediterranean Sea. Mar. Biol. 2018, 165, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Casale, P.; Broderick, A.C.; Camiñas, J.A.; Cardona, L.; Carreras, C.; Demetropoulos, A.; Fuller, W.J.; Godley, B.J.; Hochscheid, S.; Kaska, Y.; et al. Mediterranean sea turtles: Current knowledge and priorities for conservation and research. Endanger. Species Res. 2018, 36, 229–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Mazor, T.; Beger, M.; McGowan, J.; Possingham, H.P.; Kark, S. The value of migration information for conservation prioritization of sea turtles in the Mediterranean. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 2016, 25, 540–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hays, G.C.; Hawkes, L.A. Satellite tracking sea turtles: Opportunities and challenges to address key questions. Front. Mar. Sci. 2018, 5, 432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Casale, P. Sea turtle by-catch in the Mediterranean. Fish Fish. 2011, 12, 299–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Spalding, M.D.; Fox, H.E.; Allen, G.R.; Davidson, N.; Ferdaña, Z.A.; Finlayson, M.; Halpern, B.S.; Jorge, M.A.; Lombana, A.; Lourie, S.A.; et al. Marine ecoregions of the world: A bioregionalization of coastal and shelf areas. BioScience 2007, 57, 573–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Cavicchia, L.; Gualdi, S.; Sanna, A.; Oddo, P. The Regional Ocean-Atmosphere Coupled Model COSMO-NEMO_MFS. In CMCC Research Paper; The Euro-Mediteranean Centre on Climate Change: Lecce, Italy, 2015; Volume RP0254, pp. 1–22. [Google Scholar]
  15. Hijmans, R.J.; Cameron, S.E.; Parra, J.L.; Jones, P.G.; Jarvis, A. Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int. J. Clim. 2005, 25, 1965–1978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Araújo, M.B.; New, M. Ensemble forecasting of species distributions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2007, 22, 42–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Naimi, B.; Araújo, M.B. sdm: A reproducible and extensible R platform for species distribution modelling. Ecography 2016, 39, 368–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Fielding, A.H.; Bell, J.F. A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models. Environ. Conserv. 1997, 24, 38–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Allouche, O.; Tsoar, A.; Kadmon, R. Assessing the accuracy of species distribution models: Prevalence, kappa and the true skill statistic (TSS). J. Appl. Ecol. 2006, 43, 1223–1232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Liu, C.; White, M.; Newell, G. Selecting thresholds for the prediction of species occurrence with presence-only data. J. Biogeogr. 2013, 40, 778–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Luschi, P.; Casale, P. Movement patterns of marine turtles in the Mediterranean Sea: A review. Ital. J. Zool. 2014, 81, 478–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. GEBCO—General Bathymetric Chart of the Oceans. Gridded Bathymetry Data. Available online: https://download.gebco.net/ (accessed on 15 December 2020).
  23. Global Fishing Watch. Available online: http://globalfishingwatch.org/ (accessed on 20 December 2020).
  24. Kroodsma, D.A.; Mayorga, J.; Hochberg, T.; Miller, N.A.; Boerder, K.; Ferretti, F.; Wilson, A.; Bergman, B.; White, T.D.; Block, B.A.; et al. Tracking the global footprint of fisheries. Science 2018, 359, 904–908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Sequeira, A.M.M.; Hays, G.C.; Sims, D.W.; Eguíluz, V.M.; Rodríguez, J.P.; Heupel, M.R.; Harcourt, R.; Calich, H.; Queiroz, N.; Costa, D.P. Overhauling ocean spatial planning to improve marine megafauna conservation. Front. Mar. Sci. 2019, 6, 639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Haywood, J.C.; Fuller, W.J.; Godley, B.J.; Margaritoulis, D.; Shutler, J.D.; Snape, R.T.; Widdicombe, S.; Zbinden, J.A.; Broderick, A.C. Spatial ecology of loggerhead turtles: Insights from stable isotope markers and satellite telemetry. Divers. Distrib. 2020, 26, 368–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Schofield, G.; Dimadi, A.; Fossette, S.; Katselidis, K.A.; Koutsoubas, D.; Lilley, M.K.; Luckman, A.; Pantis, J.D.; Karagouni, A.D.; Hays, G.C. Satellite tracking large numbers of individuals to infer population level dispersal and core areas for the protection of an endangered species. Divers. Distrib. 2013, 19, 834–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Darmon, G.; Miaud, C.; Claro, F.; Doremus, G.; Galgani, F. Risk assessment reveals high exposure of sea turtles to marine debris in French Mediterranean and metropolitan Atlantic waters. Deep Sea Res. 2017, 141, 319–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Tomás, J.; Gozalbes, P.; Raga, J.A.; Godley, B.J. Bycatch of loggerhead sea turtles: Insights from 14 years of stranding data. Endanger. Species Res. 2008, 5, 161–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Lucchetti, A.; Vasapollo, C.; Virgili, M. An interview-based approach to assess sea turtle bycatch in Italian waters. PeerJ 2017, 5, e3151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Báez, J.C.; García-Barcelona, S.; Camiñas, J.A.; Macías, D. Fishery strategy affects the loggerhead sea turtle mortality trend due to the longline bycatch. Fish. Res. 2019, 212, 21–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Panagopoulou, A.; Meletis, Z.A.; Margaritoulis, D.; Spotila, J.R. Caught in the same net? small-scale fishermen’s perceptions of fisheries interactions with sea turtles and other protected species. Front. Mar. Sci. 2017, 4, 180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Esenlioğulları Mete, A.; Tosunoğlu, Z. Interactions between sea turtles and fishing along the Aegean Coast of Turkey. Aquat. Sci. Eng. 2019, 34, 7–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Lewison, R.L.; Crowder, L.B.; Wallace, B.P.; Moore, J.E.; Cox, T.; Zydelis, R.; McDonald, S.; DiMatteo, A.; Dunn, D.C.; Kot, C.Y.; et al. Global patterns of marine mammal, seabird, and sea turtle bycatch reveal taxa-specific and cumulative megafauna hotspots. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 5271–5276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. López-Mendilaharsu, M.; Giffoni, B.; Monteiro, D.; Prosdocimi, L.; Vélez-Rubio, G.M.; Fallabrino, A.; Estrades, A.; dos Santos, A.S.; Lara, P.H.; Pires, T.; et al. Multiple-threats analysis for loggerhead sea turtles in the southwest Atlantic Ocean. Endanger. Species Res. 2020, 41, 183–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Williams, J.L.; Pierce, S.J.; Hamann, M.; Fuentes, M.M. Using expert opinion to identify and determine the relative impact of threats to sea turtles in Mozambique. Aquat. Conserv. 2019, 29, 1936–1948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Varo-Cruz, N.; Bermejo, J.A.; Calabuig, P.; Cejudo, D.; Godley, B.J.; López-Jurado, L.F.; Pikesley, S.K.; Witt, M.J.; Hawkes, L.A. New findings about the spatial and temporal use of the Eastern Atlantic Ocean by large juvenile loggerhead turtles. Divers. Distrib. 2016, 22, 481–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Pikesley, S.K.; Broderick, A.C.; Cejudo, D.; Coyne, M.S.; Godfrey, M.H.; Godley, B.J.; Lopez, P.; López-Jurado, L.F.; Elsy Merino, S.; Varo-Cruz, N. Modelling the niche for a marine vertebrate: A case study incorporating behavioural plasticity, proximate threats and climate change. Ecography 2015, 38, 803–812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Schofield, G.; Hobson, V.J.; Fossette, S.; Lilley, M.K.; Katselidis, K.A.; Hays, G.C. Fidelity to foraging sites, consistency of migration routes and habitat modulation of home range by sea turtles. Divers. Distrib. 2010, 16, 840–853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Distribution of suitable neritic foraging habitat (pink polygons) of adult loggerhead sea turtles, Caretta caretta, under current climatic conditions (1991–2020) across the Mediterranean Sea. The locations (red points) that represent foraging adult loggerhead sea turtles, derived from the available published satellite tracked data, based on which the map of suitable foraging grounds was delineated, are also presented. Marine ecoregions [13] comprising the Mediterranean Sea are delineated by black dashed lines.
Figure 1. Distribution of suitable neritic foraging habitat (pink polygons) of adult loggerhead sea turtles, Caretta caretta, under current climatic conditions (1991–2020) across the Mediterranean Sea. The locations (red points) that represent foraging adult loggerhead sea turtles, derived from the available published satellite tracked data, based on which the map of suitable foraging grounds was delineated, are also presented. Marine ecoregions [13] comprising the Mediterranean Sea are delineated by black dashed lines.
Blsf 02 00027 g001
Figure 2. Sites (red polygons) of increased cumulative risk due to different types of fisheries (i.e., from medium up to very high exposure to longlines, trawlers, fixed nets, and purse seines fisheries) within the suitable neritic foraging habitat (striped polygons) of adult loggerhead sea turtles, Caretta caretta, under current climatic conditions (1991–2020) across the Mediterranean Sea. Marine ecoregions [13] comprising the Mediterranean Sea are delineated by black dashed lines.
Figure 2. Sites (red polygons) of increased cumulative risk due to different types of fisheries (i.e., from medium up to very high exposure to longlines, trawlers, fixed nets, and purse seines fisheries) within the suitable neritic foraging habitat (striped polygons) of adult loggerhead sea turtles, Caretta caretta, under current climatic conditions (1991–2020) across the Mediterranean Sea. Marine ecoregions [13] comprising the Mediterranean Sea are delineated by black dashed lines.
Blsf 02 00027 g002
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Almpanidou, V.; Chatzimentor, A.; Tsapalou, V.; Mazaris, A.D. Investigating the Distribution of Foraging Habitat for Loggerhead Sea Turtles, Caretta caretta, in the Mediterranean Sea. Biol. Life Sci. Forum 2021, 2, 27. https://doi.org/10.3390/BDEE2021-09423

AMA Style

Almpanidou V, Chatzimentor A, Tsapalou V, Mazaris AD. Investigating the Distribution of Foraging Habitat for Loggerhead Sea Turtles, Caretta caretta, in the Mediterranean Sea. Biology and Life Sciences Forum. 2021; 2(1):27. https://doi.org/10.3390/BDEE2021-09423

Chicago/Turabian Style

Almpanidou, Vasiliki, Anastasia Chatzimentor, Vasiliki Tsapalou, and Antonios D. Mazaris. 2021. "Investigating the Distribution of Foraging Habitat for Loggerhead Sea Turtles, Caretta caretta, in the Mediterranean Sea" Biology and Life Sciences Forum 2, no. 1: 27. https://doi.org/10.3390/BDEE2021-09423

APA Style

Almpanidou, V., Chatzimentor, A., Tsapalou, V., & Mazaris, A. D. (2021). Investigating the Distribution of Foraging Habitat for Loggerhead Sea Turtles, Caretta caretta, in the Mediterranean Sea. Biology and Life Sciences Forum, 2(1), 27. https://doi.org/10.3390/BDEE2021-09423

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop