Next Article in Journal
Urban Agriculture in Morocco: Which Model Is Adaptable to Socio-Economic and Environmental Challenges? (The Case of Marrakech)
Previous Article in Journal
In-Field Hyperspectral Proximal Sensing for Estimating Grapevine Water Status to Support Smart Precision Viticulture
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Sentinel Data and Machine Learning Algorithms for Soil Moisture Land Classification †

by
Salah Benmahmoud
1,*,
Olfa Charfi
1 and
Chiraz Masmoudi Charfi
2
1
GREEN-TEAM Laboratory (LR17AGR01-INAT), Gabes National School of Engineers (ENIG), Gabes 6029, Tunisia
2
Olive Tree Institute Tunis Office, the University of Sfax, Ariana 3029, Tunisia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 3rd International Electronic Conference on Agronomy, 15–30 October 2023; Available online: https://iecag2023.sciforum.net/.
Biol. Life Sci. Forum 2023, 27(1), 55; https://doi.org/10.3390/IECAG2023-15972
Published: 13 November 2023
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 3rd International Electronic Conference on Agronomy)

Abstract

:
Tunisia needs judicious water allocation to mitigate drought. Remote sensing tools, such as Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2, can be used to estimate soil water status and monitor changes in soil moisture and vegetation cover. The study area covers the Kairouan governorate in the center of Tunisia, (35°40′33.29″ N, 10°5′30.26″ E), which is characterized by a flat relief (plain) covering an area of 6800 Km2 and belonging to the ‘upper arid bioclimatic stage’. The study proposes a formula called “ER” to estimate soil water status from Sentinel-1 data, two color composition images to control changes in soil moisture and vegetation cover, and unsupervised ISODATA and k-means classifications to monitor the impact of climate change and land use. The data used are nine Sentinel-1 images and twelve Sentinel-2 images downloaded from the Copernicus platform at the dates given. The VV and VH Sentinel-1 GRD Level1 products were selected at different dates based on the daily precipitation amount (PA) of the studied region: PA > 55 mm,18.5 mm < PA < 33.5 mm, PA < 10 mm and PA = 0 mm for Sentinel-2, with results collected on 29/01, 23/2, 25/03, 24/04, 16/05, 11/05, 05/06, 13/06, 23/07, 24/08, 18/09 and 11/10 in 2019. For Sentinel-1, the dates of acquisition of images were 24/01, 23/02, 25/03, 12/04, 24/05, 12/06, 27/07, 15/09 and 09/10 in 2019. We chose cloudless images and we chose close dates for the two sentinels, which correspond to the dates of our field visit carried out in June and October 2019. Validation was carried out using two main criteria: (i) the measured mean precipitation deviation over successive months (EP) and (ii) the three reference land cover types (LC): cereals (LC1), fallow land (LC2) and bare soil (LC3). For this case study, three cases of EP were considered: (1) no precipitation (EP ≤ 0), (2) low precipitation (0 < EP ≤ 20 mm), and (3) high precipitation (EP > 20 mm). The results showed that, considering the VH polarization, we obtain ER < 0 for LC3 and ER ≈ 0 for the LC1 and LC2 terrestrial cultures when EP ≤ 0; ER > 0 for LC3 and ER ≈ 0 for the LC1 and LC2 terrestrial cultures when (0 < EP ≤ 20 mm); and ER > 0 for all LCs and the value increases with high rainfall. We validated these ER results using image composition and classified images.

1. Introduction

Water is an inherent necessity for the survival of living organisms, yet its availability and preservation pose a substantial challenge for humanity. In our current research endeavor, we delve into the study of soil moisture (SM), a pivotal parameter in resource management essential for ensuring optimal water productivity and sustainability.
Numerous environmental studies have explored this subject, employing diverse methodologies to monitor SM. Prior investigations have demonstrated the potential of combining radar and optical data to achieve several objectives: (i) recovering SM levels in cereal fields [1], (ii) mapping irrigated and rainfed areas [2], (iii) scrutinizing landscape alterations alongside socio-economic and environmental factors [3], and (iv) establishing correlations between radar backscatter and SM [4]. More recently, researchers in [5] harnessed neural networks to estimate SM in exclusively unvegetated soils across two research sites in France and Tunisia. In this instance, the neural networks were trained using synthetic data generated through the modified integral equation model (IEM) and validated solely with real unvegetated soil data.
This paper presents a holistic approach involving the synergy of three methods for estimating and monitoring water reserves: (1) the utilization of a formula termed ER to assess the water condition of agricultural land and unvegetated soils, employing Sentinel 1 data; (2) the introduction of two novel composite images to monitor moisture levels and changes in crop patterns; and (3) the application of unsupervised classification techniques such as ISODATA and k-means to track the impact of climate variations on land usage.

2. Dataset

2.1. Study Site

The research area is situated in the southwestern part of Tunisia, specifically within the Kairouan region, as illustrated in Figure 1. Additionally, it is bounded by latitudes 35° to 35°45′ N and longitudes 9°30′ to 10°15′ E. This region is renowned for its arid climate and the excessive depletion of its groundwater resources.

2.2. Sentinel’s Data

We obtained the satellite data from the Sentinel-2 and Sentinel-1 GRD Level 1 missions, which were acquired through the “https://scihub.copernicus.eu/dhus/#/home, accessed on 5 March 2023” platform. Sentinel-2′s MSI sensor offers multi-spectral imagery, while Sentinel-1′s synthetic aperture radar antenna provides polarimetric VV and VH data.

2.3. GCP Measures

Numerous GPS points were recorded at the site, covering various land uses such as orchards, vegetable cultivation, cereal fields, bare soils, and fallow land. Two separate measurement campaigns were conducted, one in June 2019 and another in October 2019, as indicated in Figure 1. We consider three different soil coverage types namely: cereals (LC1), fallow (LC2) and bare soil (LC3).

2.4. EP Data

The validation of the soil moisture (SM) estimates generated by our proposed method involved comparison with the measured average deviations of precipitation over consecutive months, referred to as (EP), which were calculated based on the monthly precipitation data for the year 2019, as illustrated in Figure 2.

3. Methodologies

3.1. The Proposed ER Formula

We introduce a formula for relative deviation, denoted as ER and expressed by Equation (1). The ER formula is characterized as a two-dimensional function.
ER(k,l) = (σ (k,l) − σ(k,l + 1))/(σ(k,l) + σ(k,l + 1))
where ER (k,l) represents the relative deviation of the average backscatter value σ (k,l), where k denotes the polarization of the Sentinel 1 image (VV or VH), and l corresponds to the respective month.

3.2. Images Composite Method

We utilized two distinctly colored composition images to monitor changes in humidity and crop patterns:
-
A colored composition derived from Sentinel2′s bands (B8, B4, and B3). This is primarily employed for land cover identification, particularly vegetation detection.
-
A colored composition created from Sentinel1′s polarizations. We assigned the VH polarization image to the green channel and the VV polarization image to the red channel, primarily to visualize variations in humidity relief.
The composite image creation process was conducted using the QGIS platform. To enhance the contrast in the colored composition images generated from Sentinel1 data, we applied an enhancement technique that took into account the minimum (equal to 0) and maximum values from the histograms. Additionally, a grayscale threshold of 40 (equal to the maximum value) was applied to both the VH and VV images.

3.3. Machine Learning Methods (ML)

The k-means algorithm is employed for clustering data into distinct groups or clusters based on their similarity. This iterative algorithm’s objective is to minimize the within-cluster sum of squares, often referred to as inertia.
On the other hand, the ISODATA (iterative self organizing data analysis technique) methodology is a clustering technique utilized for data analysis and pattern recognition. ISODATA combines elements from the k-means algorithm and the principles of self-organizing systems.
For our analysis, we applied both the k-means and ISODATA algorithms to the set of Sentinel2 spectral bands (B2, B3, B4 and B8). These classification processes were executed using the QGIS platform.

4. Results

4.1. ER Model Results

We examined the relationship between EP (measured average deviations of precipitation) and ER values across three land use categories: LC1, LC2, and LC3. The findings revealed that when VH polarization was considered:
-
ER < 0 for LC3, and ER approximately equals 0 for LC1 and LC2 when EP ≤ 0.
-
ER > 0 for LC3, and ER approximately equals 0 for LC1 and LC2 when (0 < EP ≤ 20 mm).
-
ER > 0 for all land cover types (LC), with an increase corresponding to higher rainfall, as shown in Figure 3.

4.2. Image Composite Results

Soil moisture (SM) estimation was conducted through a multi-date analysis of composite images from Sentinel 1 in VH polarization, as presented in Table 1. Meanwhile, the detection of changes in crops was achieved by analyzing multi-date composite images from Sentinel 2, as depicted in Figure 4.
Upon scrutinizing the Sentinel 1 composite images illustrated in Figure 5, it becomes evident that when the polarization backscatter coefficient VV shows an increase from one month to the next, it signifies the occurrence of substantial rainfall. Conversely, if this coefficient remains stable while the VH polarization coefficient decreases, it suggests the absence of rainfall. However, if both VV and VH coefficients decrease, it indicates relatively lower levels of rainfall.

4.3. Results by ML Classifier

The employed classification methods function similarly in recognizing land uses and aiding in the prediction of land use patterns, as depicted in Figure 6 and Figure 7. However, when employing either the ER method or the Sentinel 1 composite image method, it becomes challenging to discern changes in land cover, such as the presence or harvesting of cereals or their growth stage.
The growth stages of cereals can be outlined as follows: (i) January to March marks the grain’s growing season; (ii) from March to May, growth tends to stabilize; and (iii) from May until the end of June, cereals enter the maturity phase. Through the utilization of unsupervised classifiers, we were able to identify certain parcels of cereals that had been harvested in June 2019.

5. Discussion

The results of the ER model provide the best accuracy for soil moisture classification. The Sentinel1 composite images contained by using VH and VV polarizations allow us to classify LC moisture and the Sentinel2 composite images control vegetation growth.
Sentinel 1 composite images offer insights into the radar wave backscatter characteristics. These composite images serve as valuable resources for tasks such as soil classification and wetland mapping. The k-means and ISODATA classification methods enable the segmentation of the image into multiple classes, with each class representing a homogenous region of the image based on its spectral properties. This segmentation is particularly useful for soil mapping and crop monitoring purposes.

6. Conclusions

The collaboration among the three methods outlined in this article holds utmost significance. The sequential processing steps should entail: (1) conducting unsupervised classification, (2) computing ERVH, and (3) estimating PE based on Sentinel1 composite images. By adhering to this procedural sequence, we can effectively forecast both soil moisture levels and the growth stages of crops.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, O.C.; methodology, O.C. and C.M.C.; software, O.C.; validation, S.B., O.C. and C.M.C.; formal analysis, O.C. and C.M.C.; investigation, O.C. and C.M.C.; resources, S.B., O.C. and C.M.C.; data curation, S.B., O.C. and C.M.C.; writing—original draft preparation, O.C.; Sánchez, M; writing—review and editing, S.B., O.C. and C.M.C.; visualization, S.B., O.C. and C.M.C.; supervision, O.C. and C.M.C.; project administration, O.C.; funding acquisition, S.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing is not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ayari, E.; Kassouk, Z.; Lili-Chabaane, Z.; Baghdadi, N.; Bousbih, S.; Zribi, M. Cereal crops soil parameters retrieval using L-Band ALOS-2 and C-Band Sentinel-1 Sensors. Remote Sens. 2021, 13, 1393–1418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Bousbih, S.; Zribi, M.; Lili-Chabaane, Z.; Mougenot, B.; Pelletier, C.; El Hajj, M.; Baghdadi, N. Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 data for characterizing the states of continental surface over a semi-arid region in Tunisia. In Proceedings of the 2020 Mediterranean and Middle-East Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (M2GARSS), Tunis, Tunisia, 9–11 March 2020; pp. 285–288. [Google Scholar]
  3. Mekki, I.; Ferchichi, I.; Taouajouti, N.; Faysse, N.; Zaïri, A.A. Oasis extension trajectories in Kebili territory, Southern Tunisia: Drivers of development and actors’ discourse. New Medit Mediterr. J. Econ. Agric. Environ. 2022, 85–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Han, D.; Vahedifard, F.; Aanstoos, J.V. Investigating the correlation between radar backscatter and in situ soil property measurements. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 2017, 57, 136–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ettalbi, M.; Baghdadi, N.; Garambois, P.-A.; Bazzi, H.; Ferreira, E.; Zribi, M. Soil Moisture Retrieval in Bare Agricultural Areas Using Sentinel-1 Images. Remote Se1S S²Qwns 2023, 15, 3502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. GPS points on Kairouan (El houereb) field carried out in June and October 2019.
Figure 1. GPS points on Kairouan (El houereb) field carried out in June and October 2019.
Blsf 27 00055 g001
Figure 2. Monthly precipitation distributions for 2019.
Figure 2. Monthly precipitation distributions for 2019.
Blsf 27 00055 g002
Figure 3. EP and ERVH curve for land covers LC1, LC2 and LC3.
Figure 3. EP and ERVH curve for land covers LC1, LC2 and LC3.
Blsf 27 00055 g003
Figure 4. Colored composition of Sentinel2 images for two different dates. Images from up to down: 5 June 2019 and 9 March 2023.
Figure 4. Colored composition of Sentinel2 images for two different dates. Images from up to down: 5 June 2019 and 9 March 2023.
Blsf 27 00055 g004aBlsf 27 00055 g004b
Figure 5. Colored composition of Sentinel1 images for four different dates. Images from up to down: 9 October 2019, 15 September 2019, 27 July 2019 and 12 June 2019.
Figure 5. Colored composition of Sentinel1 images for four different dates. Images from up to down: 9 October 2019, 15 September 2019, 27 July 2019 and 12 June 2019.
Blsf 27 00055 g005
Figure 6. ISODATA classification of Sentinel2 dataset of 12 June 2019 with 13 clusters. The polygons represent the field truth.
Figure 6. ISODATA classification of Sentinel2 dataset of 12 June 2019 with 13 clusters. The polygons represent the field truth.
Blsf 27 00055 g006
Figure 7. K-Means classification of Sentinel2 dataset of 12 June 2019 with 16 clusters. The polygons represent the field truth.
Figure 7. K-Means classification of Sentinel2 dataset of 12 June 2019 with 16 clusters. The polygons represent the field truth.
Blsf 27 00055 g007
Table 1. Classification of SM based in variation of EP Values and intensities of Sentinel1 VH and VV data backscatter coefficients.
Table 1. Classification of SM based in variation of EP Values and intensities of Sentinel1 VH and VV data backscatter coefficients.
No RainLittle RainA Lot of Rain
EP < 00< EP < 20 (mm)EP > 20 (mm)
VH believes, VV constantVH decreases, VV constantVH constant, VV decreases
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Benmahmoud, S.; Charfi, O.; Charfi, C.M. Sentinel Data and Machine Learning Algorithms for Soil Moisture Land Classification. Biol. Life Sci. Forum 2023, 27, 55. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECAG2023-15972

AMA Style

Benmahmoud S, Charfi O, Charfi CM. Sentinel Data and Machine Learning Algorithms for Soil Moisture Land Classification. Biology and Life Sciences Forum. 2023; 27(1):55. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECAG2023-15972

Chicago/Turabian Style

Benmahmoud, Salah, Olfa Charfi, and Chiraz Masmoudi Charfi. 2023. "Sentinel Data and Machine Learning Algorithms for Soil Moisture Land Classification" Biology and Life Sciences Forum 27, no. 1: 55. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECAG2023-15972

APA Style

Benmahmoud, S., Charfi, O., & Charfi, C. M. (2023). Sentinel Data and Machine Learning Algorithms for Soil Moisture Land Classification. Biology and Life Sciences Forum, 27(1), 55. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECAG2023-15972

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop