Next Article in Journal
Optimization of Metabolic Stability of Ligands of Serotonin Receptor 5-HT7 Using SHAP Values
Previous Article in Journal
Comparison of Remote Sensing Soil Electrical Conductivity from PlanetScope and Ground Measured Data in Wheat and Beet Yields
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Abstract

Metagenomic and Culturomic Approaches for Blueberry Biofertilizer Design †

by
José David Flores Félix
1,*,
Fernando Sanchez-Juanes
2,
Luis R. Silva
1 and
Gilberto Alves
1
1
CICS-UBI–Health Sciences Research Centre, University of Beira Interior, 6201-506 Covilhã, Portugal
2
Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca (IBSAL), Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Salamanca, Universidad de Salamanca, 37007 Salamanca, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 1st International Electronic Conference on Agronomy, 3–17 May 2021; Available online: https://iecag2021.sciforum.net/.
Biol. Life Sci. Forum 2021, 3(1), 49; https://doi.org/10.3390/IECAG2021-09668
Published: 1 May 2021
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 1st International Electronic Conference on Agronomy)

Abstract

:
Some decade ago, the blueberry (Vaccinium myrtillus) crop was introduced in Portugal and is widespread along the North and Center of Portugal. It has great relevance as an exportation product, taking advantage of the climatic conditions they allow to produce when the market does not have entrances from the producing countries of Northern Europe. However, this climate condition could create problems shortly since, if climate change models are correct, an increase in temperature and a reduction in precipitation will happen. In this work, we study the rhizospheric and endophytic population of wild blueberry plants in three locations of mainland Portugal intending to determine the core bacterial populations of these plants in Portugal to design new biofertilizers to improve the adaptation of this crop. The metagenomic approach revealed that the rhizospheric populations are influenced by temperature and climate, but the plant modulates the endophytic populations of Vaccinium. From this plant s total of 318 bacterial strains were isolated, and their infraspecific diversity has been analyzed using RAPD-M13, obtaining 66 different fingerprints, which were identified employing MALDI-TOF MS methodology and a comparison against the MALDI Biotyper 3.0 database. A 64% of the strains were identified at genus level and the remaining ones by 16S rRNA sequencing. Bacillus, Serratia, Streptomyces, Paenibacillus, Pantoea, or Pseudomonas were some of the identified genera. Most strains were able to grow at pH 5.5, in presence of 2% NaCl and were psychoresistant. Plant growth promotion potential of these strains was analyzed revealing that most isolates were capable of solubilizing dicalcium phosphate, and only 17% of the isolates produced siderophores.

Supplementary Materials

The poster presentation is available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/IECAG2021-09668/s1.

Funding

This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No. 101003373.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Félix, J.D.F.; Sanchez-Juanes, F.; Silva, L.R.; Alves, G. Metagenomic and Culturomic Approaches for Blueberry Biofertilizer Design. Biol. Life Sci. Forum 2021, 3, 49. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECAG2021-09668

AMA Style

Félix JDF, Sanchez-Juanes F, Silva LR, Alves G. Metagenomic and Culturomic Approaches for Blueberry Biofertilizer Design. Biology and Life Sciences Forum. 2021; 3(1):49. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECAG2021-09668

Chicago/Turabian Style

Félix, José David Flores, Fernando Sanchez-Juanes, Luis R. Silva, and Gilberto Alves. 2021. "Metagenomic and Culturomic Approaches for Blueberry Biofertilizer Design" Biology and Life Sciences Forum 3, no. 1: 49. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECAG2021-09668

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop