Next Article in Journal
Calcium Biofortification in Solanum tuberosum L.: Assessing the Influence of Calcium Nitrate and Calcium Chloride on Yield
Previous Article in Journal
Agriculture Revolutionized by Artificial Intelligence: Harvesting the Future
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Evaluation of Durum Wheat Genotypes at Germination Stage under Salinity Stress †

1
Council for Research in Agriculture and Economics, Research Center for Plant Protection and Certification, Viale Regione Siciliana sud/est, 90121 Palermo, Italy
2
Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Pisa, Viale delle Piagge, 56124 Pisa, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 2nd International Online Conference on Agriculture, 1–15 November 2023; Available online: https://iocag2023.sciforum.net/.
Biol. Life Sci. Forum 2024, 30(1), 12; https://doi.org/10.3390/IOCAG2023-16339
Published: 27 November 2023
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 2nd International Online Conference on Agriculture)

Abstract

:
The aim of this work was to investigate several durum wheat genotypes (eleven landraces, two old varieties and seven modern cultivars) for salt tolerance at germination and early growth stages. Seeds were tested under two different concentrations of NaCl solution (50 mM and 100 mM) and a control (T) with distilled water. Experiments were laid out in a two-factorial design with three replications. Two-way ANOVA was performed and means were compared with Duncan’s Multiple Range test. Seven parameters were measured under laboratory conditions: germination, mean germination time, shoot length, root length, root number, shoot dry matter and root dry matter. Rusticano, with the highest value of root number (5.44), was statistically different from all other genotypes. Timilia reste bianche, Timilia reste nere, Ciciredda and Cappelli are highlighted for the best root length performance at 100 mM.

1. Introduction

Salinity is one of the most severe abiotic stress factors affecting plant growth and agricultural production worldwide. It affects almost 1 billion ha worldwide, globally representing about 7% of the continental extent of the earth [1]. Agricultural crops exhibit a wide spectrum of responses under salt stress. Salinity affects almost all aspects of plant development including germination, vegetative growth and reproductive development. It strongly inhibits seed germination through osmotic stress, ion-specific effects and oxidative stress. Sicily, with its variable pedoclimatic conditions, is an important source of agro-biodiversity. In this context, over recent centuries, farmers have made a continuous selection that has led to the creation of numerous landraces.
Landraces are named and maintained by traditional farmers to meet their social, economic, cultural and environmental needs. Durum wheat [(Triticum turgidum L. subsp. durum (desf.) Husn.] is a typical Sicilian crop with a cultivated area of about 270,000 ha, although on small areas (about 5000 ha), in the last decade, the cultivation of landraces has been reintroduced [2]. Landraces, which have arisen through a combination of natural selection and the selection performed by farmers, usually have a broader genetic base and can therefore provide valuable characteristics important for breeding. To date, 24 Sicilian durum wheat landraces are listed in the national register of varieties (https://www.sian.it/portale-sian/home.jsp consultation in 22 July 2023). Information on the genotypic tolerance to salt stress during the germination process is lacking in Sicilian durum wheat landraces. Limited literature work has been documented so far on these genotypes, so knowing their behavior can help breeding programs in the selection of salt-tolerant varieties to achieve optimum wheat growth under saline conditions. The aim of this work was to investigate several durum wheat genotypes (eleven landraces, two old varieties and seven modern cultivars) for salt tolerance at germination and early growth stages.

2. Materials and Methods

Laboratory experiments were conducted to evaluate the germination traits of 20 durum wheat genotypes at the Council for Research in Agriculture and Economics—Research Centre for Plant protection and Certification Palermo, Italy in 2023. The seeds of all the genotypes tested were obtained in our experimental station during the growing season 2021/2022 and stored at 5 °C with 30% relative humidity.
Seven modern varieties of durum wheat (Ciclope, Duilio, K-26, Mongibello, Quadrato, Rusticano and Simeto), two old varieties (Capeiti 8 and Trinakria) and eleven landraces (Cappelli, Castiglione glabro, Ciciredda, Francesa, Perciasacchi, Russello, Russello Ibleo, Scorsonera, Timilia reste bianche, Timilia reste nere and Urria) were assessed. Seeds were tested under 2 different concentrations of NaCl solution (50 mM and 100 mM) and a control (T) with distilled water. Seeds were surface-sterilized in 5% sodium hypochlorite solution for 3 min and washed thoroughly under tap water for 10 min and at the end with distilled water. To avoid water losses, the edges of Petri dishes were tightly sealed with an impermeable colorless parafilm. Seeds were allowed to germinate at 20 °C in the dark.
To each Petri dish, sterilized in an oven at 120 °C for 2 h, 12 mL of solution was added to keep the filter paper uniformly soaked without flooding. Fifty randomly selected seeds for each variety were placed in Petri dishes with a 13.5 cm diameter (one replication was made up of 2 Petri dishes containing 25 seeds each) on a double layer of Whatman filter paper No. 1 with the crease facing down and kept in a thermostatic cabinet (KW Scientific Equipment model WRS 85). Shoot and root lengths and fresh and dry weights were recorded after 7 days. Data for shoot and root lengths were obtained from 50 seedlings in each replication.
The seedlings’ fresh and dry weights were taken with the help of a digital balance (Mettler Toledo PR503 Delta Range); dry weight was measured by placing them at 80 °C in a hot air oven for 24 h until a constant weight was observed.
Experiments were laid out in a two-factorial design with three replications using a complete randomized design (CRD). A two-way ANOVA was performed and means were compared with Duncan’s Multiple Range test at a 5% level of probability. The assumption of normality and homoscedasticity was verified with Shapiro–Wilk and Levene’s tests, respectively.
Seven parameters were measured under laboratory conditions: germination, mean germination time (MGT), shoot length, root length, root number, shoot dry matter and root dry matter.
Germination percentages were recorded daily up to the 7th day using radicle extrusion (≥2 mm long) as a criterion. A seed was considered to show abnormal germination if shoot growth occurred in the absence of radicle extension. They are expressed as the ratio of germinated seeds on the 7th day to the total number of seeds using the following formula:
G = (c/a) × 100
where a = total number of seeds, c = number of germinated seeds on the 7th day.
Mean germination time (MGT, days): This parameter is determined according to the following formula [3]:
MGT =∑ (ni × di)/Σ b
where n is the number of seeds germinated on day i, d is the incubation period in days, and b is the total number of seeds germinated upon treatment.
To compute shoot and root dry matter, the following formula was used:
Dry matter (%) = (Dry weight/fresh weight) × 100

3. Results

Genotype, concentration and their interaction showed significant differences in many of the parameters studied (Table 1).
As shown in Table 2, Rusticano, Ciclope, Simeto and Mongibello are notable for the significantly shorter mean germination times (ranging from 2.15 to 2.20 days) compared to Cappelli, Francesa, Perciasacchi and Russello Ibleo (ranging from 2.43 to 2.68 days). In general, all the landraces were reported to have better shoot lengths than modern varieties; the top values are for Ciciredda, Scorsonera, Timilia reste nere and Timilia reste bianche with 7.95, 7.85, 7.76 and 7.69 cm, respectively, values significantly higher than all modern varieties.
Rusticano showed the highest value of root number (5.44), statistically different from all other genotypes; however, Timilia reste nere, Timilia reste bianche, Cappelli, Ciciredda were characterized by the lowest values.
In general, modern varieties showed significantly higher shoot dry matter values than landraces except for Francesa, Scorsonera and Russello Ibleo.
A rise in NaCl concentration determined an increase in the mean germination time and shoot dry matter; mean germination time passed from 2.31 days (control) to 2.38 days (50 mM) and 2.43 days (100 mM), while shoot dry matter varied from 8.92 (control) to 10.04 (100 mM). Increasing the concentration of NaCl in the solution led to a significant reduction in shoot length from 7.73 cm (control) to 5.67 cm (100 mM). The root number was higher at 50 mM (Figure 1).
Remarkable germination values, at 100 mM, were obtained by Timilia reste nere (98.67%), Ciclope (98.00%), Mongibello (96.67%) and Timilia reste bianche (96%); in particular, Timilia reste nere showed the highest value, statistically different from the two modern varieties Duilio and Quadrato; Trinakria, Scorzonera, Russello and Russello Ibleo reported the lowest ones, statistically different from all other genotypes.
At 50 mM, the landraces Cappelli, Urria, Timilia reste bianche and Timilia Reste nere showed good performance of germination, while Trinakria, with the lowest value, was statistically different from the other varieties tested.
The root length best performances at 100 mM were achieved by Timilia reste bianche (7.88 cm), Timilia reste nere (6.84 cm), Ciciredda (6.75 cm) and Cappelli (6.54 cm); Perciasacchi, Russello Ibleo and Duilio were statistically different to Ciciredda, Timilia reste bianche and Timilia reste nere (Table 3).

4. Discussion

Seed germination is a major factor limiting the establishment of plants under saline conditions. As supported by the available literature [4,5,6,7], our results confirm that durum wheat seeds tend to germinate at a lower rate and take a longer time when exposed to salt stress. Increasing NaCl concentrations led to a rise in mean germination time and shoot dry matter and a reduction in the shoot length of the seedlings.
The interaction of wheat genotypes with salinity level was found to be significant for germination and root length. This means that there was a crossover effect among the cultivars tested for these parameters.
Among the genotypes, all the landraces showed the best performance in shoot length, and many of them have been signaled for good performance in germination and root length (Timilia reste bianche, Timilia reste nere, Ciciredda and Cappelli).
The root number value being significantly higher at 50 mM is probably due to a stimulating action of the solution, to be investigated in further studies. On the other hand, the increase in the maximum concentration resulted in a statistically significant reduction in this parameter.
In conclusion, we can affirm that landraces are interesting genetic materials to be investigated and used in breeding programs for the selection of varieties better tolerant to salt stress. Timilia reste bianche, Timilia reste nere, Ciciredda and Cappelli are highlighted for the best root length performance at 100 mM.
To confirm our results and extend the study at later growing stages, further study is needed.

Supplementary Materials

The presentation materials can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/IOCAG2023-16339/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization. M.V. and B.F.; methodology. S.S.; software. B.F.; validation. M.V., B.F. and S.S.; formal analysis. B.F.; data curation. B.F.; writing—original draft preparation. M.V. and B.F.; writing—review and editing. C.M.; supervision. M.V.; technical support. A.R., L.R., R.P. and M.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Shrivastava, P.; Kumar, R. Soil salinity: A serious environmental issue and plant growth promoting bacteria as one of the tools for its alleviation. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2015, 22, 123–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Vaccarella, M.; Frangipane, B.; Raimondo, L.; Rigoglioso, A.; Miceli, C. Seed germination of Sicilian durum wheat landraces under the influence of different temperature regimes. In Proceedings of the 1st International Electronic Conference on Agronomy, Online, 3–17 May 2021. [Google Scholar]
  3. Hmissi, M.; Chaieb, M.; Krouma, A. Differences in physiological indicators of seed germination and seedling establishment of durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.) cultivars subjected to salinity stress. Agronomy 2023, 13, 1718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Hasanuzzaman, M.; Nahar, K.; Rahman, A.; Anee, T.I.; Alam, M.U.; Bhuiyan, T.F.; Oku, H.; Fujita, M. Approaches to Enhance Salt Stress Tolerance in Wheat. Wheat Improv. Manag. Util. 2017, 8, 151–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Saboora, A.; Kiarostami, K.; Behroozbayati, F.; Hajihashemi, S. Salinity (NaCl) tolerance of wheat genotypes at germination and early seedling growth. Pakistan J. Biol. Sci. 2006, 9, 2009–2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hussain, S.; Khaliq, A.; Matloob, A.; Wahid, M.A.; Afzal, I. Germination and growth response of three wheat cultivars to NaCl salinity. Soil Environ. 2013, 32, 36–43. [Google Scholar]
  7. Naseer, S.; Nisar, A.; Ashraf, M. Effect of Salt Stress on Germination and Seedling Growth of Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Pakistan J. Biol. Sci. 2001, 4, 359–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Influence of concentration on (a) Mean germination time (MGT); (b) Shoot dry matter (%); (c) Shoot length (cm); (d) Root number. Means followed by the same letter are not statistically different according to Duncan’s Multiple Range test at the 5% probability level.
Figure 1. Influence of concentration on (a) Mean germination time (MGT); (b) Shoot dry matter (%); (c) Shoot length (cm); (d) Root number. Means followed by the same letter are not statistically different according to Duncan’s Multiple Range test at the 5% probability level.
Blsf 30 00012 g001
Table 1. Factorial analysis of variance.
Table 1. Factorial analysis of variance.
Source of VariationdfGermination (%)MGTShoot Length (cm)Root Length (cm)Root Number (n°)Shoot Dry Matter (%)Root Dry Matter (%)
Genotype19********************
Concentration2****************n.s.
Genotype × Concentration38***n.s.n.s.*n.s.n.s.n.s.
*** significantly different at p < 0.001; ** significantly different at p < 0.01; * significantly different at p < 0.5; n.s. not significantly different.
Table 2. Influence of genotype on some parameters studied.
Table 2. Influence of genotype on some parameters studied.
Genotypes MGTShoot
Lenght (cm)
Root
Number (n°)
Shoot
Dry Matter (%)
Root
Dry Matter (%)
Rusticano2.15f6.03efg5.44a9.99bc13.17abc
K-262.26def6.68cde4.83cde10.19b12.86abcd
Capeiti 82.55bc7.61abc4.62ef9.28cdef13.29ab
Ciclope2.19ef5.66fg4.80cde10.52ab11.65bcde
Cappelli2.43cd7.09abcd4.12h8.57fg10.46e
Scorsonera2.29def7.85a4.46fg9.37cde12.89abcd
Mongibello2.20ef6.65cde5.13b9.89bcd10.92cde
Quadrato2.31def6.46def5.07bc10.42ab13.41ab
Francesa2.43cd7.13abcd4.66def9.15defg12.90abcd
Ciciredda2.24def7.95a4.22gh8.52fg11.63bcde
Castiglione glabro2.39cd7.21abcd4.62ef8.66efg12.85abcd
Russello2.33def7.32abcd4.44fg8.48g12.43abcde
Russello Ibleo2.68ab7.60abc4.48fg9.77bcd11.34bcde
Duilio 2.35de6.04efg4.94bcd9.83bcd12.33abcde
Timila reste nere2.39cd7.76ab3.96h8.64efg10.47e
Timilia reste bianche2.39cd7.69ab4.07h8.49g11.41bcde
Perciasacchi2.65ab6.82bcde4.95bc8.98efg13.14abcd
Simeto2.19ef5.34g4.42fg11.02a14.00a
Urria2.29def7.05abcd4.42fg9.00efg11.44bcde
Trinakria2.74a6.49def4.57ef8.91efg10.85de
In each column, means followed by the same letter are not statistically different according to Duncan’s Multiple Range test at the 5% probability level.
Table 3. Influence of the concentration × genotype interaction on some parameters studied.
Table 3. Influence of the concentration × genotype interaction on some parameters studied.
Concentration × GenotypeGermination %Root Lenght (cm)
0 mMCapeiti 897.33abc6.89fghijklmnopqrstuv
Castiglione glabro97.33abc7.83cdefghijk
Ciciredda95.33abcdef7.90cdefghij
Ciclope92.67abcdefghi9.22abc
Duilio 94.00abcdefghij7.72defghijkl
Francesa88.67fghijkl8.12cdefgh
K-2690.00defghijk6.99defghijklmnopqrst
Mongibello93.33abcdefghi7.91cdefghij
Perciasacchi89.33efghijk7.05defghijklmnopqrs
Quadrato94.33abcdefgh6.94efghijklmnopqrstu
Russello88.00ghijkl8.45bcd
Russello Ibleo83.33klm7.56defghijklm
Rusticano96.67abcd7.26defghijklmnopqr
Scorsonera86.67ijkl7.81cdefghijk
Cappelli97.33abc8.01cdefghi
Simeto95.33abcdef6.37klmnopqrstuvwxy
Timila reste nere95.33abcdef9.53ab
Timilia reste bianche91.67abcdefghij10.06a
Trinakria82.00lmn6.69hijklmnopqrstuvw
Urria93.33abcdefghi7.55defghijklmn
50 mMCapeiti 896.67abcd6.92efghijklmnopqrstu
Castiglione glabro88.00ghijkl6.69hijklmnopqrstuvw
Ciciredda88.67fghijkl6.99defghijklmnopqrst
Ciclope95.33abcdef7.38defghijklmnopq
Duilio 92.00abcdefghij5.98pqrstuvwxyz
Francesa91.33bcdefghij7.74defghijkl
K-2692.67abcdefghi8.17cdefg
Mongibello95.33abcdef6.55ijklmnopqrstuvwx
Perciasacchi89.00efghijk6.04opqrstuvwxyz
Quadrato92.00abcdefghij6.49jklmnopqrstuvwx
Russello85.33jkl7.31defghijklmnopq
Russello Ibleo92.67abcdefghi6.48jklmnopqrstuvwx
Rusticano98.33ab7.42defghijklmnop
Scorsonera87.33hijkl7.47defghijklmno
Cappelli98.00ab8.40bcde
Simeto94.00abcdefgh6.99defghijklmnopqrst
Timila reste nere94.67abcdefg8.28bcdef
Timilia reste bianche94.67abcdefg8.22bcdefg
Trinakria74.00o6.55ijklmnopqrstuvwx
Urria95.33abcdef6.99defghijklmnopqrst
100 mMCapeiti 894.00abcdefgh5.83rstuvwxyz
Castiglione glabro88.67fghijkl6.18mnopqrstuvwxy
Ciciredda92.67abcdefghi6.75ghijklmnopqrstuvw
Ciclope98.00ab5.32wxyz
Duilio 90.67cdefghij5.14xyz
Francesa90.00defghijk6.07nopqrstuvwxyz
K-2695.00abcdefg6.00opqrstuvwxyz
Mongibello96.67abcd5.77stuvwxyz
Perciasacchi85.33jkl4.68z
Quadrato87.33hijkl5.78rstuvwxyz
Russello78.00mno5.56tuvwxyz
Russello Ibleo78.33mno4.93yz
Rusticano95.33abcdef6.27lmnopqrstuvwxy
Scorsonera77.33mno6.02opqrstuvwxyz
Cappelli95.00abcdefg6.54ijklmnopqrstuvwx
Simeto94.67abcdefg5.50uvwxyz
Timila reste nere98.67a6.84fghijklmnopqrstuv
Timilia reste bianche96.00abcde7.88cdefghij
Trinakria76.00no5.90qrstuvwxyz
Urria94.00abcdefgh5.44vwxyz
In each column, means followed by the same letter are not statistically different according to Duncan’s Multiple Range test at the 5% probability level.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Vaccarella, M.; Frangipane, B.; Saia, S.; Raimondo, L.; Rigoglioso, A.; Petralia, R.; Genduso, M.; Miceli, C. Evaluation of Durum Wheat Genotypes at Germination Stage under Salinity Stress. Biol. Life Sci. Forum 2024, 30, 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/IOCAG2023-16339

AMA Style

Vaccarella M, Frangipane B, Saia S, Raimondo L, Rigoglioso A, Petralia R, Genduso M, Miceli C. Evaluation of Durum Wheat Genotypes at Germination Stage under Salinity Stress. Biology and Life Sciences Forum. 2024; 30(1):12. https://doi.org/10.3390/IOCAG2023-16339

Chicago/Turabian Style

Vaccarella, Mauro, Benedetto Frangipane, Sergio Saia, Luciano Raimondo, Antonino Rigoglioso, Rosa Petralia, Marco Genduso, and Claudia Miceli. 2024. "Evaluation of Durum Wheat Genotypes at Germination Stage under Salinity Stress" Biology and Life Sciences Forum 30, no. 1: 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/IOCAG2023-16339

APA Style

Vaccarella, M., Frangipane, B., Saia, S., Raimondo, L., Rigoglioso, A., Petralia, R., Genduso, M., & Miceli, C. (2024). Evaluation of Durum Wheat Genotypes at Germination Stage under Salinity Stress. Biology and Life Sciences Forum, 30(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/IOCAG2023-16339

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop