Next Article in Journal
Root Traits Differentiates Osmotic Stress Tolerant and Susceptible Wheat Genotypes under PEG-Treatment
Previous Article in Journal
Role of Class III Peroxidases in Stem Lignification of Zinnia elegans Jacq.
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Intergenomic Crossover Formation in Newly Synthesized Trigeneric Hybrids Involving Wheat, Rye and Barley †

by
María-Dolores Rey
1 and
Azahara C. Martín
2,*
1
Agroforestry and Plant Biochemistry, Proteomics and Systems Biology, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Córdoba, 14004 Córdoba, Spain
2
John Innes Centre, Crop Genetics Department, Norwich NR4 7UH, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 1st International Electronic Conference on Plant Science, 1–15 December 2020; Available online: https://iecps2020.sciforum.net/.
Biol. Life Sci. Forum 2021, 4(1), 24; https://doi.org/10.3390/IECPS2020-08747
Published: 1 December 2020
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 1st International Electronic Conference on Plant Science)

Abstract

:
Polyploidization, or whole genome duplication (WGD), has an important role in evolution and speciation. One of the biggest challenges faced by a new polyploid is meiosis, particularly, discriminating between multiple related chromosomes, so that only homologs recombine, to ensure regular chromosome segregation and fertility. Here, we report the production of two new hybrids that are formed by the genomes of species from three different genera, as follows: a hybrid between Aegilops taushii (DD), Hordeum chilense (HchHch), and Secale cereale (RR), with the haploid genomic constitution DHchR (n = 7x = 21); and a hybrid between Triticum turgidum spp. durum (AABB), H. chilense, and S. cereale, with the constitution ABHchR (n = 7x = 28). We used genomic in situ hybridization to establish the chromosome composition of the new hybrids, and to study their meiotic behavior. Interestingly, there were multiple chromosome associations at metaphase I in both hybrids, indicating the presence of a crossover formation between the different genomes. We tried to duplicate the genome of both hybrids, to obtain the corresponding amphiploid, achieving success with the ABHchR hybrid. Several amphiploids AABBHchHchRR were obtained and characterized. These results indicate that recombination between the genera of three economically important crops is possible.

1. Introduction

Many of the world’s most important crops, including wheat, rapeseed, sugarcane, and cotton, are recent allopolyploids. This is not a coincidence; allopolyploidy often show higher adaptability, can grow over larger geographical areas, and show better adaptation to the local environment than their diploid progenitors [1]. Despite their obvious advantages in adaptation, newly formed allopolyploids face the challenge of organizing two or more genomes that have evolved independently, within a single nucleus. Many will be the challenges, but probably, the biggest of all will be meiosis. Meiosis is the specialized cell division that generates haploid gametes for sexual reproduction. During meiosis, at least one crossover (CO) needs to be formed between every pair of homologs, to ensure accurate chromosome segregation and balanced gametes. In newly formed allopolyploids, apart from the two identical homologs present in diploid species, there are also very similar chromosomes (homeologs), which will complicate the process of recognition and synapsis between homologs. Consequently, allopolyploidization is frequently accompanied by irregular meiosis, unbalanced gametes and sterility.
In this study, we describe the production of two new intergeneric hybrids and one amphiploid, formed by the genome of species from three different genera inside the Triticeae tribe. We then used genomic in situ hybridization (GISH) to establish their chromosome composition and to study their meiotic behavior at metaphase I.

2. Materials and Methods

The plant material used in this study includes the following: the wild barley Hordeum chilense accession H7 (2n = 2x = 14; genome HchHch); Aegilops tauschii (2n = 2x = 14; genome DD); Secale cereale (2n = 2x = 14; genome RR); and ×Tritordeum martinii lines HT377 (with the translocation T1RS·1BL) and HT474 (2n = 6x = 42; genome AABBHchHch).
Genomic in situ hybridization (GISH) was performed as previously described [2]. Briefly, genomic DNA from T. durum (A and B genomes), H. chilense (Hch genome) and S. cereale (R genome) were used as probes. H. chilense and S. cereale genomes were labeled with biotin-16-dUTP and digoxigenin-11-dUTP using the biotin- or the DIG-nick translation mix, respectively (Sigma). Biotin-labeled probes were detected with streptavidin-Cy3 or streptavidin-Cy5; digoxigenin-labeled probes were detected with anti-digoxigenin-FITC (Sigma). T. durum genomic DNA was labeled by nick translation with tetramethyl-rhodamine-5-dUTP.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Production and Chromosome Constitution of the Trigeneric Hybrids and Amphyploids

3.1.1. Hybrid HchDR

H. chilense and Ae. taushii were duplicated after colchicine treatment. Tetraploid H. chilense was pollinated with tetraploid Ae. Taushii, and HchHchDD hybrid plants were established after embryo rescue. Finally, H. chilense × Ae. taushii hybrids were pollinated with rye (S. cereale), and out of 200 florets that were pollinated, 2 adult hybrids HchDR were recovered by embryo rescue. The HchDR hybrids showed vigorous vegetative growth and tillered profusely. They showed a similar morphology to the female parent H. chilense × Ae. squarrosa hybrid. All the florets were sterile.
The root-tip metaphase spreads were analyzed by multicolour GISH, to verify the genome constitution of the HchDR hybrid (Figure 1a). The three recovered hybrids had 21 chromosomes, comprising 7 chromosomes from H. chilense (magenta), 7 chromosomes from rye (green), and 7 chromosomes from Ae. taushii (grey), confirming that they are true trigeneric hybrids (n = 3x = 21).

3.1.2. Hybrid ABHchR

To produce the trigeneric hybrid ABHchR, we used hexaploid ×Tritordeum martinii lines HT377 (with the translocation T1RS·1BL) and HT474. Tritordeum was crossed as the female parent, with rye as the male parent. The ABHchR hybrids all showed similar morphology to the tritordeum female parent, with an erect vegetative development and a smaller number of tillers than the DHchR. This hybrid displayed a morphology that was more characteristic of a crop, and not the one of a wild species as the HchDR does. All the florets were sterile.
The root-tip metaphase spreads were analyzed by GISH, to verify the genome constitution of the ABHchR hybrids obtained (Figure 1b). All the recovered hybrids possessed 28 chromosomes, containing 14 chromosomes from the AB genome (grey), 7 from H. chilense (magenta), and 7 from rye (green). This confirmed that they were true trigeneric hybrids (n = 4x = 28; ABHchR).

3.1.3. Amphiploid AABBHchHchRR

Several trigeneric hybrids have been obtained in the last decades, to be used as bridges in the transference of genes from wild species into wheat, with varying degrees of success [3,4,5,6,7]. However, apart from triticale and tritordeo, the production of the stable amphiploid is rare. Here, we treated the HchDR and the ABHchR hybrids with colchicine, to induce whole genome duplication and obtain the corresponding amphiploids. Only the ABHchR, using tritordeum HT377, was duplicated. The chromosome number of the obtained amphiploids AABBHchHchRR ranged from 49 to 54, none of them having the complete set of 56 chromosomes. Only the following two amphiploids produced progeny: AABBHchHchRR-1 and AABBHchHchRR-2. The morphology of the partial amphiploids was similar to ABHchR hybrids, but shorter. Each individual amphiploid was slightly different from each other, due to the different chromosome compositions. Unfortunately, all the florets were sterile.
We used the same combination of genomic GISH probes as with the ABHchR hybrid, to establish the genome constitution of the amphiploids. All the individuals were aneuploids, with chromosome numbers ranging from 46 + 2 telosomic chromosomes (46 + 2 t) to 51 chromosomes (Figure 1c). The H. chilense genome was the most affected, with only seven chromosomes in some of the individuals. All the amphiploids showed at least one T1RS·1BL translocation coming from tritordeum HT377. There were numerous telosomic chromosomes from all the genomes.

3.2. Analysis of Meiotic Metaphase I Configuration in the Trigeneric Hybrid HchDR

In diploid species, only homologous chromosomes recombine during meiosis, to ensure accurate chromosome segregation. However, no homologous chromosomes are present in a haploid hybrid. We used GISH to study the meiotic behavior of the three genome’s chromosomes at metaphase I, using the same labelling conditions as for the somatic cells (Table 1). Surprisingly, 76.7% of the cells showed some chromosome associations. Most of these associations were rod bivalents between two chromosomes, but several ring bivalents and trivalents were also observed (Figure 2a–d). One might expect that most of these associations were between chromosomes belonging to the same genera; however, that was not the case, with the higher number of associations being observed between Hordeum and Aegilops (47.2%), followed by Aegilops and Secale associations (29%). We could even detect several trivalents, where chromosomes from the three genera were involved. These results highlight the potential use of this material to promote or stimulate recombination between genomes that would not normally recombine in a wild-type situation. We are not able to demonstrate that all the associations observed are quiasmatic and produce a recombination event, because this hybrid is sterile, and we cannot recover the results of these recombination events in the next generation. However, even if some of the more end-to-end associations could be non-chiasmatic, there are some very clear examples where the crossover structure is clearly observed between two pairs of chromosomes (Figure 2a,d), confirming that there is recombination between the different genera.

Analysis of Meiotic Metaphase I Configuration in the Trigeneric Hybrid ABHchR and Its Corresponding Amphiploid AABBHchHchRR

A total of 100 meiotic metaphase I cells were analyzed, out of which 38 cells showed some chromosome association, frequently a single association (Table 2). Although associations were observed between all the different genomes (Figure 2e–h), the number was much lower than in HchDR hybrids, and, moreover, only rod bivalent structures were detected. Rod bivalents have one association per bivalent, instead of the two associations per trivalent and ring bivalent structures, which emphasizes the lower number of associations observed in the ABHchR hybrid compared with the HchDR. This could be explained due to the present of the ph1 locus on the 5B genome. Due to its polyploid nature, polyploid wheat had to develop a mechanism to ensure than only homologous chromosomes recombine, ensuring accurate chromosome segregation and fertility. Thus, wheat behaves as a diploid during meiosis, with every chromosome recombining only with its true homolog; this is a phenotypic behavior that has been mostly attributed to Ph1, a dominant locus on chromosome 5B [8,9]. Moreover, not only the number of associations is smaller, but, also, contrary to the associations in HchDR, they are extremely distal, and thus, it is possible that they are non-chiasmatic. Unfortunately, since ABHchR is also sterile, we cannot check the progeny to determine the output of the meiotic associations.
Finally, we analyzed the meiotic behavior of the following two of the amphiploids: AABBHchHchRR-1-1 and AABBHchHchRR-2-1 (Figure 2i–k). A total of 125 and 112 meyocites were analyzed from each genotype, respectively. Interestingly, despite being aneuploids and presenting multiple chromosome reorganizations, the presence of associations between the different genera was only anecdotical, as shown in Figure 2i. There were multiple rod and ring bivalents, as expected in an amphiploid, but also trivalents and quatrivalents were present (Figure 2j), due to their aneuploidy. No difference, in terms of associations, was observed between AABBHchHchRR-1-1 and AABBHchHchRR-2-1.

4. Conclusions

Due to their economic importance, Triticeae species, such as wheat, rye, and barley, have been bred intensively in the past hundreds of years, resulting in massive improvements in yield and quality, but also in a huge decrease in their genetic diversity. Thus, the incorporation of genetic variability, from related and wild species into cultivated ones, is a priority, but also a challenge, due to the presence of reproductive barriers that hinder genetic transfer among them. The results presented here demonstrate that recombination between three cultivated species as distant as wheat, rye, and barley, is possible. The next challenge will be to recover these recombination events, so they can be transferred into crops.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.C.M. and M.-D.R.; investigation, A.C.M. and M.-D.R.; writing—original draft preparation, A.C.M.; writing—review and editing, A.C.M. and M.-D.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the UK Biotechnology and Biological Research Council (BBSRC), through a grant part of the Designing Future Wheat (DFW) Institute Strategic Programme (BB/P016855/1). M.-D.R. is grateful for the Juan de la Cierva-Incorporación contract IJC2018-035272-I by the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created in this study. Data sharing is not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Feldman, M.; Levy, A.A. Genome evolution due to allopolyploidization in wheat. Genetics 2012, 192, 763–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Martín, A.C.; Borrill, P.; Higgins, J.; Alabdullah, A.; Ramírez-González, R.H.; Swarbreck, D.; Uauy, C.; Shaw, P.; Moore, G. Genome-wide transcription during early wheat meiosis is independent of synapsis, ploidy level, and the Ph1 Locus. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Gupta, P.K.; Fedak, G. Hybrids of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum) with Thinopyrum scirpeum (4×) and Thinopyrum junceum (6×). Plant Breed. 1986, 97, 107–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Orellana, J.; Vazquez, J.F.; Carrillo, J.M. Genome analysis in wheat–rye–Aegilops caudata trigeneric hybrids. Genome 1989, 32, 169–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Fernandez-Escobar, J.; Martin, A. A self-fertile trigeneric hybrid in the Triticeae involving Triticum, Hordeum, and Secale. Euphytica 1989, 42, 291–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Yu, C.; Jia, X.; Hu, S.; Zhuang, J. Cytogenetics of the hybrids and their pollen plants of three genera Triticum secale and Thinopyrum. Acta Genet. Sin. 1993, 21, 447–452. [Google Scholar]
  7. Li, X.F.; Song, Z.Q.; Liu, S.B.; Gao, J.R.; Wang, H.G. Cytogenetic study of a trigeneric (triticale× trileymus) hybrid. Euphytica 2006, 150, 117–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sears, E.R.; Okamoto, M. Intergenomic chromosome relationship in hexaploidy wheat. In Proceedings of the 10th International Congress of Genetics, Montreal, QC, Canada, 17–25 August 1958; Volume 2, pp. 258–259. [Google Scholar]
  9. Riley, R.; Chapman, V. Genetic control of the cytologically diploid behavior of hexaploidy wheat. Nature 1958, 182, 713–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Root-tip metaphases of the trigeneric hybrids and amphiploid analyzed by GISH. (a) Hybrid HchDR (n = 3x = 21) showing seven chromosomes of H. chilense (magenta), seven of rye (green) and seven of Ae. taushii (grey). (b) Hybrid ABHchR (n = 4x = 28) using tritordeum HT474, with 14 chromosomes from durum wheat (grey), 7 from H. chilense (magenta) and 7 from rye (green). (c) Aneuploid amphiploid AABBHchHchRR-2-2 with 51 chromosomes. The two translocations T1RS·1BL are indicated by an arrow. Another centromeric translocation between H. chilense and rye is marked with an asterisk.
Figure 1. Root-tip metaphases of the trigeneric hybrids and amphiploid analyzed by GISH. (a) Hybrid HchDR (n = 3x = 21) showing seven chromosomes of H. chilense (magenta), seven of rye (green) and seven of Ae. taushii (grey). (b) Hybrid ABHchR (n = 4x = 28) using tritordeum HT474, with 14 chromosomes from durum wheat (grey), 7 from H. chilense (magenta) and 7 from rye (green). (c) Aneuploid amphiploid AABBHchHchRR-2-2 with 51 chromosomes. The two translocations T1RS·1BL are indicated by an arrow. Another centromeric translocation between H. chilense and rye is marked with an asterisk.
Blsf 04 00024 g001
Figure 2. GISH of meiotic metaphase I configuration in the trigeneric hybrids DHchR (ad), ABHchR (eh) and aneuploid amphiploid AABBHchHchRR (ik). H. chilense is shown in magenta, and rye in green. In DHchR, Ae. Taushii is shown in grey. In ABHchR and AABBHchHchRR, durum wheat is shown in grey.
Figure 2. GISH of meiotic metaphase I configuration in the trigeneric hybrids DHchR (ad), ABHchR (eh) and aneuploid amphiploid AABBHchHchRR (ik). H. chilense is shown in magenta, and rye in green. In DHchR, Ae. Taushii is shown in grey. In ABHchR and AABBHchHchRR, durum wheat is shown in grey.
Blsf 04 00024 g002
Table 1. Number of chromosome associations observed in the trigeneric hybrid HchDR.
Table 1. Number of chromosome associations observed in the trigeneric hybrid HchDR.
No. and Type of Chromosome AssociationsTotal % of Associations
Rod BivalentRing BivalentTrivalent
Hordeum-Hordeum3001.7
Aegilops-Aegilops1000.6
Secale-Secale15008.5
Hordeum-Aegilops735047.2
Hordeum-Secale13007.4
Aegilops-Secale510029.0
Hordeum-Aegilops-Secale0044.5
Hordeum-Aegilops-Aegilops0011.1
Total No. of associations1561010
Table 2. Number of chromosome associations observed in the trigeneric hybrid ABHchR.
Table 2. Number of chromosome associations observed in the trigeneric hybrid ABHchR.
Rod BivalentTotal % of Associations
Triticum-Triticum48.5
Hordeum-Hordeum511.9
Secale-Secale48.5
Triticum-Hordeum1535.7
Triticum-Secale1023.8
Hordeum-Secale48.5
Total No. of associations42
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rey, M.-D.; Martín, A.C. Intergenomic Crossover Formation in Newly Synthesized Trigeneric Hybrids Involving Wheat, Rye and Barley. Biol. Life Sci. Forum 2021, 4, 24. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECPS2020-08747

AMA Style

Rey M-D, Martín AC. Intergenomic Crossover Formation in Newly Synthesized Trigeneric Hybrids Involving Wheat, Rye and Barley. Biology and Life Sciences Forum. 2021; 4(1):24. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECPS2020-08747

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rey, María-Dolores, and Azahara C. Martín. 2021. "Intergenomic Crossover Formation in Newly Synthesized Trigeneric Hybrids Involving Wheat, Rye and Barley" Biology and Life Sciences Forum 4, no. 1: 24. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECPS2020-08747

APA Style

Rey, M. -D., & Martín, A. C. (2021). Intergenomic Crossover Formation in Newly Synthesized Trigeneric Hybrids Involving Wheat, Rye and Barley. Biology and Life Sciences Forum, 4(1), 24. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECPS2020-08747

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop