Previous Issue
Volume 9, MaxEnt 2023
 
 

Phys. Sci. Forum, 2024, IOCP 2024

  • Issues are regarded as officially published after their release is announced to the table of contents alert mailing list.
  • You may sign up for e-mail alerts to receive table of contents of newly released issues.
  • PDF is the official format for papers published in both, html and pdf forms. To view the papers in pdf format, click on the "PDF Full-text" link, and use the free Adobe Reader to open them.
Number of Papers: 1
Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Other

8 pages, 1811 KiB  
Proceeding Paper
Comparison of Different Far-UVC Sources with Regards to Intensity Stability, Estimated Antimicrobial Efficiency and Potential Human Hazard in Comparison to a Conventional UVC Lamp
by Ben Sicks, Florian Maiss, Christian Lingenfelder, Cornelia Wiegand and Martin Hessling
Phys. Sci. Forum 2024, 10(1), 1; https://doi.org/10.3390/psf2024010001 - 19 Nov 2024
Viewed by 53
Abstract
The recently much noticed Far-UVC spectral range offers the possibility of inactivating pathogens without necessarily posing a major danger to humans. Unfortunately, there are various Far-UVC sources that differ significantly in their longer wavelength UVC emission and, subsequently, in their risk potential. Therefore, [...] Read more.
The recently much noticed Far-UVC spectral range offers the possibility of inactivating pathogens without necessarily posing a major danger to humans. Unfortunately, there are various Far-UVC sources that differ significantly in their longer wavelength UVC emission and, subsequently, in their risk potential. Therefore, a simple assessment method for Far-UVC sources is presented here. In addition, the temporal intensity stability of Far-UVC sources was examined in order to reduce possible errors in irradiation measurements. For this purpose, four Far-UVC sources and a conventional Hg UVC lamp were each spectrally measured for about 100 h and mathematically evaluated for their antimicrobial effect and hazard potential using available standard data. The two filtered KrCl lamps were found to be most stable after a warm-up time of 30 min. With regard to the antimicrobial effect, the radiation efficiencies of all examined (Far-) UVC sources were more or less similar. However, the calculated differences in the potential human hazard to eyes and skin were more than one order of magnitude. The two filtered KrCl lamps were the safest, followed by an unfiltered KrCl lamp, a Far-UVC LED and, finally, the Hg lamp. When experimenting with these Far-UVC radiation sources, the irradiance should be checked more than once. If UVC radiation is to be or could be applied in the presence of humans, filtered KrCl lamps are a much better choice than any other available Far-UVC sources. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Previous Issue
Back to TopTop