Next Issue
Volume 1, December
Previous Issue
Volume 1, June
 
 

FinTech, Volume 1, Issue 3 (September 2022) – 5 articles

  • Issues are regarded as officially published after their release is announced to the table of contents alert mailing list.
  • You may sign up for e-mail alerts to receive table of contents of newly released issues.
  • PDF is the official format for papers published in both, html and pdf forms. To view the papers in pdf format, click on the "PDF Full-text" link, and use the free Adobe Reader to open them.
Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
18 pages, 365 KiB  
Article
Choice between IEO and ICO: Speed vs. Liquidity vs. Risk
by Anton Miglo
FinTech 2022, 1(3), 276-293; https://doi.org/10.3390/fintech1030021 - 9 Sep 2022
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 3349
Abstract
This paper analyzes a financing problem for an innovative firm that is considering launching a web-based platform. The model developed in the paper is the first one that analyzes an entrepreneur’s choice between initial exchange offering (IEO) and initial coin offering (ICO). Compared [...] Read more.
This paper analyzes a financing problem for an innovative firm that is considering launching a web-based platform. The model developed in the paper is the first one that analyzes an entrepreneur’s choice between initial exchange offering (IEO) and initial coin offering (ICO). Compared to ICO, under IEO the firm is subject to screening by an exchange that reduces the risk of investment in tokens; also the firm receives access to a larger set of potential investors; finally tokens become listed on an exchange faster. The paper argues that IEO is a better option for the firm if: (1) the investment size is relatively large; (2) the extent of moral hazard problems faced by the firm is relatively large; (3) the degree of investors’ impatience is relatively small. Furthermore, a non-linear relationship between firm quality and its financing choice is found. Most of these predictions are new and have not been tested so far. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Development in Fintech)
Show Figures

Figure 1

26 pages, 665 KiB  
Article
A Low-Storage Blockchain Framework Based on Incentive Pricing Strategies
by Po-Han Ko, Yu-Ling Hsueh and Chih-Wen Hsueh
FinTech 2022, 1(3), 250-275; https://doi.org/10.3390/fintech1030020 - 6 Sep 2022
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2436
Abstract
Nowadays, blockchain bloat is an endangering issue caused by inefficient transaction storage mechanisms. Based on the Distributed File System (DFS), the blockchain network can reduce the local storage to solve the blockchain bloat problem. However, storing all blocks on DFS is not durable [...] Read more.
Nowadays, blockchain bloat is an endangering issue caused by inefficient transaction storage mechanisms. Based on the Distributed File System (DFS), the blockchain network can reduce the local storage to solve the blockchain bloat problem. However, storing all blocks on DFS is not durable or scalable. Hence, classifying blocks into hot and cold was adopted in previous works. The blockchain nodes can reduce the time consumption and storage consumption by storing hot blocks locally. However, the previous works are not able to periodically check block integrity and do not provide a reward mechanism to encourage DFS system nodes to store blocks. We extend previous works based on the InterPlanetary File System (IPFS) and design an innovative scheme to incentivize IPFS nodes. The IPFS nodes are regulated with smart contracts and behave under the pricing strategy controls to increase profit. By adopting proof of retrievability, we guarantee the integrity of the blocks. Further, the redundant scheme extends our pricing strategy to improve the durability of our proposed framework. A load-balancing pricing strategy and a general pricing strategy are provided in the framework to reward the DFS nodes. Extensive experiments are presented to demonstrate that the latency and throughputs of our model are competitive, while still maintaining data integrity in the system. The additional increased throughput takes only 0.167% of that produced by the original Bitcoin and the upload latency takes only 6.67% of the mining time of the Bitcoin Mainnet. Furthermore, our load-balancing pricing strategy achieves the effectiveness to ensure the redundancy of blocks and reduces the overall storage consumption up to 97% using the load-balancing pricing strategy, compared to the non-load-balancing pricing strategy. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 984 KiB  
Review
A Comparative Study of the Design Frameworks of the Ghanaian and Nigerian Central Banks’ Digital Currencies (CBDC)
by Kwami Ahiabenu
FinTech 2022, 1(3), 235-249; https://doi.org/10.3390/fintech1030019 - 19 Aug 2022
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 5078
Abstract
This paper discusses critical considerations in the design of central bank digital currency (CBDC) in West Africa through a comparative case study of Ghana’s (eCedi) and Nigeria’s (eNaira) design frameworks. This paper analyses CBDC design options framed through context (digital payment landscape and [...] Read more.
This paper discusses critical considerations in the design of central bank digital currency (CBDC) in West Africa through a comparative case study of Ghana’s (eCedi) and Nigeria’s (eNaira) design frameworks. This paper analyses CBDC design options framed through context (digital payment landscape and CBDC objectives), technical aspects (design principles, architecture, risks), use cases, and deployment plans. This study conducted a thematic analysis of official CBDC design documents to identify similarities, differences, and patterns. The results indicate more similarities between the eCedi and eNaira designs than differences. Differences were observed in the CBDC deployment context, risk profiles, and plans. Surprisingly, neither country has articulated the detailed legal and regulatory environments for CBDC. This paper highlights the use of CBDC designs to promote citizens’ welfare by using financially inclusive policy goals within central banking’s welfare functions, thereby extending their traditional role. Policymakers should focus on adaptive legal and policy design outlooks to address uncertainties associated with CBDC. This paper is important because it is one of the first to contribute to a detailed comparison of Ghana and Nigeria’s CBDC design frameworks. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Development in Fintech)
Show Figures

Figure A1

10 pages, 536 KiB  
Communication
Some Very Simple Economics of Web3 and the Metaverse
by Paul P. Momtaz
FinTech 2022, 1(3), 225-234; https://doi.org/10.3390/fintech1030018 - 1 Jul 2022
Cited by 27 | Viewed by 6447
Abstract
The Metaverse refers to a shared vision among technology entrepreneurs of a three-dimensional virtual world, an embodied internet with humans and the physical world in it. As such, the Metaverse is thought to expand the domain of human activity by overcoming spatial, temporal, [...] Read more.
The Metaverse refers to a shared vision among technology entrepreneurs of a three-dimensional virtual world, an embodied internet with humans and the physical world in it. As such, the Metaverse is thought to expand the domain of human activity by overcoming spatial, temporal, and resource-related constraints imposed by nature. The technological infrastructure of the Metaverse, i.e., Web3, consists of blockchain technology, smart contracts, and Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs), which reduce transaction and agency costs, and enable trustless social and economic interactions thanks to decentralized consensus mechanisms. The emerging Metaverse may give rise to new products and services, new job profiles, and new business models. In this brief note, I assess the promises and challenges of the Metaverse, offer a first empirical glimpse at the emerging Metaverse economy, and discuss some simple Metaverse economics that revolve around building and operating the Metaverse. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Development in Fintech)
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 824 KiB  
Communication
The Non-Fungible Token (NFT) Market and Its Relationship with Bitcoin and Ethereum
by Lennart Ante
FinTech 2022, 1(3), 216-224; https://doi.org/10.3390/fintech1030017 - 29 Jun 2022
Cited by 104 | Viewed by 17619
Abstract
Non-fungible tokens (NFTs) are transferrable rights to digital assets, such as art, in-game items, collectables, or music. The phenomenon and its markets have grown significantly since early 2021. We investigate the interrelationships between NFT sales, NFT users (unique active blockchain wallets), and the [...] Read more.
Non-fungible tokens (NFTs) are transferrable rights to digital assets, such as art, in-game items, collectables, or music. The phenomenon and its markets have grown significantly since early 2021. We investigate the interrelationships between NFT sales, NFT users (unique active blockchain wallets), and the pricing of Bitcoin (BTC) and Ether (ETH). Using daily data between January 2018 and April 2021, we show that a Bitcoin price shock triggers an increase in NFT sales. Also, Ether price shocks reduce the number of active NFT wallets. The results suggest that (larger) cryptocurrency markets affect the growth and development of the (smaller) NFT market, but there is no reverse effect. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Development in Fintech)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Previous Issue
Next Issue
Back to TopTop