Previous Issue
Volume 1, December
 
 

Complications, Volume 2, Issue 1 (March 2025) – 2 articles

  • Issues are regarded as officially published after their release is announced to the table of contents alert mailing list.
  • You may sign up for e-mail alerts to receive table of contents of newly released issues.
  • PDF is the official format for papers published in both, html and pdf forms. To view the papers in pdf format, click on the "PDF Full-text" link, and use the free Adobe Reader to open them.
Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
10 pages, 203 KiB  
Article
Thirty-Day Complications Following Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Lumbar Disc Arthroplasty: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis
by Phillip B. Wyatt, Charles R. Reiter, James R. Satalich, Conor N. O’Neill, Anirugh K. Gowd, Dantae King, Albert Anastasio, John Cyrus, Samuel Adams and Prakasam Kalluri
Complications 2025, 2(1), 2; https://doi.org/10.3390/complications2010002 - 9 Jan 2025
Viewed by 369
Abstract
The anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) and lumbar disc arthroplasty (LDA) procedures are both commonly performed to improve the quality of life and pain in people with lower back pain. However, few recent studies have compared 30-day complications on a large scale. The [...] Read more.
The anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) and lumbar disc arthroplasty (LDA) procedures are both commonly performed to improve the quality of life and pain in people with lower back pain. However, few recent studies have compared 30-day complications on a large scale. The objectives of this study were to compare the 30-day complications seen after ALIF and LDA and identify risk factors for these complications. The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database was queried between the years 2012–2021 (10 years in total) for records of patients who underwent either ALIF or LDA as a primary procedure. Patients in each group underwent a 1:1 propensity match for age, gender, BMI, ASA status, diabetes mellitus (DM), hypertension requiring medication, congestive heart failure (CHF), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), inpatient/outpatient status, smoking status, and bleeding disorders. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine significant differences in complications and risk factors between these cohorts. A total of 1218 propensity-matched subjects, with 609 receiving ALIF and 609 receiving LDA, were included in the analyses of this study. The incidence of extended length of stay (LOS) (>4 days) was higher in the ALIF cohort compared to the LDA cohort (14.6% vs. 4.76%, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that subjects who underwent LDA had lower odds (Odds Ratio [OR]: 0.457; 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 0.283–0.738, p = 0.001) of experiencing extended LOS compared to the ALIF cohort. Longer operative times increased the odds of prolonged LOS in both cohorts. The results of this study suggest that ALIF is associated with longer LOS than LDA when baseline demographic data are controlled. Further, longer operative times increase the odds that subjects receiving either ALIF or LDA will experience a prolonged LOS. Besides extended LOS, ALIF and LDA produce a relatively similar 30-day complication profile. Full article
10 pages, 1465 KiB  
Case Report
Posterior Dislocation of Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty—A Case Report and Review
by Valentino de Ruvo, Alfonso Strianese, Lily Chacra, Luca Rossetti, Fabio Patelli and Paolo Fogagnolo
Complications 2025, 2(1), 1; https://doi.org/10.3390/complications2010001 - 3 Jan 2025
Viewed by 307
Abstract
In this study, we describe a case of graft dislocation into the vitreous cavity after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK), and review the risk factors and complications of posterior dislocation. A 70-year-old female with disruption of the iris–lens diaphragm experienced DSAEK graft [...] Read more.
In this study, we describe a case of graft dislocation into the vitreous cavity after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK), and review the risk factors and complications of posterior dislocation. A 70-year-old female with disruption of the iris–lens diaphragm experienced DSAEK graft dislocation into the vitreous cavity during air re-bubbling at 1 week postoperatively. The corneal opacity hindered adequate visualization of the vitreous cavity for the immediate retrieval of the graft. Five days after re-bubbling, vitrectomy and corneal tissue removal was performed using a temporary Eckardt keratoprosthesis, and penetrating keratoplasty was subsequently performed. Two weeks after graft removal, a retinal detachment occurred. Silicon oil was used as a tamponade to reattach the retina. Three months after the last procedure, the retina was attached, and the cornea was clear. Posterior dislocation of DSAEK graft is a rare complication. A disrupted iris–lens diaphragm and previous vitrectomy are the main risk factors. Severe vision loss is more likely to occur when corneal tissue removal is delayed. In cases of delayed removal, it is advisable to take precautions to prevent possible retinal detachment. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Complications in Ophthalmology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Previous Issue
Back to TopTop