Laboratories, Volume 2, Issue 3 (September 2025) – 5 articles

Online laboratories have emerged as a viable alternative for providing hands-on experience to engineering students, especially in fields related to computer, software, and electrical engineering. In particular, remote laboratories enable users to interact in real time with physical hardware via the internet. However, current remote laboratory systems often restrict access to a single user per session, limiting broader participation. Embedded systems laboratory activities have traditionally relied on in-person instruction and direct interaction with hardware, requiring significant time for code development, compilation, and hardware testing. Students typically spend an important portion of each session coding and compiling programs, with the remaining time dedicated to hardware implementation, data collection, and report preparation. This paper proposes a remote laboratory implementation that optimizes remote laboratory stations’ availability, allowing users to lock the system only during the project debugging and testing phases while freeing the remote laboratory station for other users during the code development phase. The implementation presented here was developed for a microprocessor laboratory course. It enables users to code the solution in their preferred local or remote environments, then upload the resulting source code to the remote laboratory hardware for cross-compiling, execution, and testing. This approach enhances usability, scalability, and accessibility while preserving the core benefits of hands-on experimentation and collaboration in online embedded systems education. Full article

The Multi-User Textile Analysis Laboratory (LTex), a case study from a Brazilian university, was established to address the technical demands of the local textile industry, a regional hub with a predominantly female workforce. Globally, laboratories seeking recognition for their technical competence rely on accreditation to a widely adopted international standard. This work explores how the technical requirements of this standard can be integrated with Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) principles, using a Brazilian recommended practice aligned with global frameworks such as the UN Sustainable Development Goals as a reference. The goal is to propose a unified framework for sustainable and inclusive management in university laboratories. The research employed an exploratory literature review, a documentary analysis comparing the two normative documents, the development of a structured checklist, and the formulation of a conceptual model for sustainable and inclusive laboratory management. The findings identified both overlaps and gaps, particularly regarding risk management, transparency, and gender equity, and supported the creation of an evaluation tool structured around six thematic axes. The proposed checklist enables simultaneous assessment of technical compliance and ESG maturity, guiding laboratories toward aligning accreditation processes with sustainability goals. The LTex case study demonstrates the model’s applicability and its potential to foster regulatory compliance, organizational improvement, and female empowerment in technical leadership. Full article

Polycarbonate laboratory safety glasses and facial shields were tested for impact resistance. Impacts from 22-caliber bullets fired from a firearm were compared with impacts of pellets fired from an air rifle. A low-weight pellet fired from an air rifle is a suitable and safer alternative to the use of a firearm. The results show that if there is a need for protection from flying projectiles, one should use multiple layers of protection. Furthermore, already-damaged protective equipment, even if the damage appears to be minor, may not provide any protection and should not be used. The resulting impacted polycarbonate lenses and sheets were used in a classroom discussion with the undergraduate chemistry students about polymer properties and adequate safety protection. Full article

This review recalls some ISO 15189:2022 requirements for the management of examination results and emerging alternatives to internal quality control (IQC) in relation to Italian Society of Clinical Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (SIPMeL) Recommendation Q19. We observed phenomena of contrasting “metrological”, or rather “tracealogic”, and “statistical” approaches. SIPMeL Recommendation Q19 enhances IQC with a moving average based on ISO 15189, which enables the use of the moving average of patient sample results (MA). In the veterinary field, the procedure of QC with repeat testing on patient samples (RPT-QC) has met with some success. The “Bayesian approach” of IQC makes use of the distinction between a priori probability, evidential probability (data) and a posteriori probability (IQC rules). SIPMeL Recommendation Q19 strictly adheres to the ISO 15189:2022 document. SIPMeL Q19 calls for abandoning the 1–2 s rule, using appropriate computer tools, not only control charts, and trying to reduce false positives to very low frequencies. Alternatives to IQC using patient results and the Bayesian approach are compatible with ISO 15189 and SIPMeL Q19. In contrast, the alternative using material designed for traceability with assigned values, is not compatible with the ISO standard. Full article

From an occupational health perspective, if not stored, handled, and disposed of properly, laboratory chemicals exhibit hazardous properties such as flammability, corrosion, and explosibility. Additionally, they can also cause a range of health effects in handlers, including irritation, sensitization, and carcinogenicity. Additionally, the chemical waste generated during the planned assay is a significant byproduct and, if left untreated, can cause detrimental effects on both living organisms and non-living elements when released into the environment. Chemically, laboratory waste contains reagents, organic and inorganic compounds, and diagnostic stains. These agents are more toxic and hazardous than residential waste and affect the personnel handling them and the environments in which they are released. Considering this, it is crucial to adhere to waste management regulations during the various stages including generation, segregation, collection, storage, transportation, and treatment. This is extremely important and necessary if we are to avoid harm to individuals and environmental contamination. This review encompasses the examination of laboratory medical waste, various categories of chemical waste, and strategies to minimize and ensure the safe disposal of these toxic agents. As far as the authors are aware, this is the first review that focuses on the effects of laboratory-generated chemical wastes and environmental ethics. This is a neglected topic in healthcare education, and this review will serve as a valuable resource for students. Full article