Metrics, Volume 2, Issue 2 (June 2025) – 2 articles

Scatterplots can reveal important data relationships, but their visual complexity can make pattern identification challenging. Systematic analytical approaches help structure interpretation by dividing scatterplots into meaningful regions. This paper introduces the region partitioning framework (RCF), a systematic method for dividing scatterplots into interpretable regions using k × k grids, in order to enhance visual data analysis and quantify structural changes through transformation metrics. RCF partitions the x and y dimensions into k × k grids (e.g., 4 × 4 or 16 regions), balancing granularity and readability. Each partition is labeled using an R(p, q) notation, where p and q indicate the position along each axis. Two perspectives are supported: the absolute mode, based on raw values (e.g., “very short, narrow”), and the relative mode, based on min–max normalization (e.g., “short relative to population”). I propose a set of transformation metrics—density, net flow, relative change ratio, and redistribution index—to quantify how data structures change between modes. The framework is demonstrated using both the Iris dataset and a subset of the airquality dataset, showing how RCF captures clustering behavior, reveals outlier effects, and exposes normalization-induced redistributions. Full article

In an era of evolving scholarly ecosystems, machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) have become pivotal in advancing research impact analysis. Despite their transformative potential, the fragmented body of literature in this domain necessitates consolidation to provide a comprehensive understanding of their applications in multidimensional impact assessment. This study bridges this gap by employing bibliometric methodologies, including co-authorship analysis, citation burst detection, and advanced topic modelling using BERTopic, to analyse a curated corpus of 1608 scholarly articles. Guided by three core research questions, this study investigates how ML and AI enhance research impact evaluation, identifies dominant methodologies, and outlines future research directions. The findings underscore the transformative potential of ML and AI to augment traditional bibliometric indicators by uncovering latent patterns in collaboration networks, institutional influence, and knowledge dissemination. In particular, the scalability and semantic depth of BERTopic in thematic extraction, combined with the visualisation capabilities of tools such as CiteSpace and VOSviewer, provide novel insights into the dynamic interplay of scholarly contributions across dimensions. Theoretically, this research extends the scientometric discourse by integrating advanced computational techniques and reconfiguring established paradigms for assessing research contributions. Practically, it provides actionable insights for researchers, institutions, and policymakers, enabling enhanced strategic decision-making and visibility of impactful research. By proposing a robust, data-driven framework, this study lays the groundwork for holistic and equitable research impact evaluation, addressing its academic, societal, and economic dimensions. Full article