Next Article in Journal
MicroRNAs in Cardiac Hypertrophy
Previous Article in Journal
Drug-Induced Hypertension Caused by Multikinase Inhibitors (Sorafenib, Sunitinib, Lenvatinib and Axitinib) in Renal Cell Carcinoma Treatment
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 20
Issue 19
10.3390/ijms20194713
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Regulation of Heat Shock Factor Pathways by γ-aminobutyric Acid (GABA) Associated with Thermotolerance of Creeping Bentgrass

by
Ting Liu
†,
Zhaoqiao Liu
†,
Zhou Li
*,
Yan Peng
,
Xinquan Zhang
,
Xiao Ma
,
Linkai Huang
,
Wei Liu
,
Gang Nie
and
Liwen He
Department of Grassland Science, College of Animal Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20(19), 4713; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20194713
Submission received: 15 August 2019 / Revised: 13 September 2019 / Accepted: 17 September 2019 / Published: 23 September 2019
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Plant Sciences)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Activation and enhancement of heat shock factor (HSF) pathways are important adaptive responses to heat stress in plants. The γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) plays an important role in regulating heat tolerance, but it is unclear whether GABA-induced thermotolerance is associated with activation of HSF pathways in plants. In this study, the changes of endogenous GABA level affecting physiological responses and genes involved in HSF pathways were investigated in creeping bentgrass during heat stress. The increase in endogenous GABA content induced by exogenous application of GABA effectively alleviated heat damage, as reflected by higher leaf relative water content, cell membrane stability, photosynthesis, and lower oxidative damage. Contrarily, the inhibition of GABA accumulation by the application of GABA biosynthesis inhibitor further aggravated heat damage. Transcriptional analyses showed that exogenous GABA could significantly upregulate transcript levels of genes encoding heat shock factor HSFs (HSFA-6a, HSFA-2c, and HSFB-2b), heat shock proteins (HSP17.8, HSP26.7, HSP70, and HSP90.1-b1), and ascorbate peroxidase 3 (APX3), whereas the inhibition of GABA biosynthesis depressed these genes expression under heat stress. Our results indicate GABA regulates thermotolerance associated with activation and enhancement of HSF pathways in creeping bentgrass.

1. Introduction

Persistent high temperature in summer seriously affects the normal growth and development of plants. Heat stress has become one of the main abiotic stresses limiting crop production and the quality of ground cover plants due to the aggravation of global warming [1,2]. Cool-season turfgrasses such as creeping bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera L.) adapt to cool-humid and cool-arid climates, but are susceptible to heat stress [3,4]. However, creeping bentgrass has become the first choice for establishing high-quality turf, such as the putting green in a golf course, because of its fine texture, charming color, and stoloniferous habit [4,5]. It is of great significance to find an effective way to improve heat tolerance of creeping bentgrass in summer. The application of plant growth regulators (PGRs) for improving heat tolerance of plants has many advantages including low cost and environmental risk, simple operation, and stable effect [6]. Previous studies have shown that suitable dose of exogenous PGRs such as fructose, abscisic acid (ABA), and salicylic acid (SA) can significantly improve heat tolerance of creeping bentgrass [7,8].
γ-Aminobutyric acid (GABA) is a non-protein amino acid and widely exists in eukaryotes and prokaryotes [9]. As an important nerve conduction signal in animals, GABA has been broadly studied and its function is involved in metabolic regulation, antioxidation, and nutrient digestibility under stress condition [10,11]. In higher plants, GABA acts as an important nitrogen source and intermediator of metabolism for plant growth and development and also quickly accumulates in response to various environmental stresses including high temperature stress [12,13,14]. Previous studies have confirmed that GABA priming effectively enhanced tolerance to osmotic stress in black pepper (Piper nigrum) associated with osmotic adjustment and antioxidant defense [15]. GABA treatment could alleviate chilling injury of Anthurium spp. cut flowers by enhancing GABA shunt, ATP supply, and endogenous glycine betaine accumulation [16]. Exogenous application of GABA significantly increased the growth and survival rate of four-day-old rice (Oryza sativa) under heat stress by improving leaf turgor and upregulating osmoprotectants and antioxidants [17]. GABA may act as a signal molecule interacting with plant hormones and other metabolites, which regulates heat tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana [18]. Foliar application of GABA induced heat tolerance of creeping bentgrass involved in regulating osmotic potential, tricarboxylic acid cycle, and metabolic homeostasis [14]. However, limited researches reveal possible effects of GABA on regulating heat tolerance in plants at the transcriptional level.
When plants are exposed to a high-temperature environment, their normal growth and development will be inhibited and physiological metabolism will be disordered [14,19]. A typical heat-induced symptom is leaves turning yellow and withered due to oxidative damage, chlorophyll degradation, and water imbalance [20,21]. Early sensing and transduction of heat stress signals in plants are mainly mediated by heat shock factors (HSFs) leading to the production of various cell-protective molecular chaperone proteins such as heat shock proteins (HSPs) [22]. Activation and enhancement of HSF pathways are important adaptive responses to heat stress in plants. HSFs are critical transcription factors involved in transcriptional activation of heat shock genes. Many downstream heat-defensive genes, including HSPs and ascorbate peroxidases (APXs), could be regulated by HSFs [23,24]. HSPs function to stabilize proteins and refold stress-damaged proteins during heat stress or other abiotic stress [25,26]. APXs play important roles in scavenging stress-induced H2O2 overaccumulation, thereby alleviating oxidative damage in plants [27]. However, it still needs to be further studied whether the mediation of endogenous GABA level affects HSFs pathways contributing to heat tolerance in plants. Objectives of this study were to investigate effects of GABA and its biosynthetic inhibitor 3-mercaptopropionic acid (3-MPA) on physiological changes including water status, photosynthesis, oxidative damage, and antioxidant capacity in creeping bentgrass during a prolonged period of high temperature stress, and to further examine whether the GABA-induced heat tolerance is related to the activation and enhancement of HSF pathways. The current study will contribute to better understanding of the positive function of GABA on regulating heat tolerance in plants at the transcriptional level.

2. Results

2.1. The Mediation of Endogenous GABA Level Affects Water Status and Photosynthesis during Heat Stress

The GABA-pretreated creeping bentgrass (C+GABA) showed significantly higher endogenous GABA content than untreated plants (C) under normal condition. Under heat stress, heat-stressed plants with GABA pretreatment (H+GABA) had a 22% increase in GABA content than heat-stressed plants without GABA application (H). On the contrary, heat-stressed plants pretreated with 3-MPA (H+3-MPA) showed 15% decrease in GABA content than heat-stressed plants without GABA treatment (H) in leaves (Figure 1). The GABA and 3-MPA had no significant effects on relative water content (RWC) and electrolyte leakage (EL) during 30 d of the non-stress condition (Figure 2). Heat stress resulted in a significant decrease in RWC and increase in EL in untreated, GABA-treated, or 3-MPA-treated plants. The GABA-treated creeping bentgrass maintained significantly higher leaf RWC than untreated and 3-MPA-treated plants during 30 d of heat stress (Figure 2A). The exogenous application of GABA reduced heat-induced increase in EL, whereas the 3-MPA application aggravated the heat-induced increase in EL and decrease in RWC (Figure 2). Compared to the untreated control, exogenous GABA and 3-MPA had no significant effects on chlorophyll (Chl) content in plants under normal condition, but GABA-treated plants showed significantly higher total Chl than 3-MPA-treated plants at 30 d of normal condition (Figure 3). Under heat stress, GABA-treated plants maintained higher Chl content than untreated and 3-MPA-treated plants, while the 3-MPA-treated plants had the lower Chl content than GABA-treated and untreated plants in leaves. There were significant differences in Chl a, Chl b, and total Chl among three treatments (H, H+GABA, and H+3-MPA) after 30 days of heat stress (Figure 3). For changes of photosynthesis and water use efficiency (WUE), exogenous GABA and 3-MPA had no significant effects on photochemical efficiency (Fv/Fm), performance index on absorption (PIABS), and net photosynthetic rate (Pn), but the GABA application obviously improved WUE in leaves under normal condition (Figure 4). Heat stress caused persistent declines in Pn, Fv/Fm, PIABS, and WUE in all treatments. The application of GABA or 3-MPA alleviated or aggravated heat-induced decreases in Fv/Fm, PIABS, Pn, and WUE when plants were subjected to 30 d of heat stress. The heat-stressed plants with GABA pretreatment exhibited a 30%, 11%, 46%, or 43% increase in Pn, Fv/Fm, and PIABS, or WUE than heat-stressed plants without GABA pretreatment, respectively. On the contrary, the Chl, Pn, Fv/Fm, or PIABS was significantly lower in heat-stressed plants pretreated with 3-MPA than that in heat-stressed plants without 3-MPA treatment, respectively (Figure 4).

2.2. The Mediation of Endogenous GABA Level Affects Antioxidant Capacity and Oxidative Damage under Heat Stress

The total antioxidant capacity (TAC), generation of superoxide anion (O2−), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), and malondialdehyde (MDA) content were not significantly affected by exogenous application of GABA and 3-MPA under normal condition (Figure 5). The TAC in GABA-treated and untreated plants (H+GABA and H) were obviously improved by heat stress. GABA-treated plants exhibited 33% increase in TAC than untreated plants under heat stress. On the contrary, the TAC in heat-stressed plants with 3-MPA pretreatment (H+3-MPA) decreased by 9%, as compared to heat-stressed plants without 3-MPA treatment (H) (Figure 5A). As shown in Figure 5B–D, heat stress significantly induced the accumulation of O2.−, H2O2, and MDA in all plants. However, exogenous GABA or 3-MPA decreased or enhanced heat-induced O2.−, H2O2, and MDA accumulation in leaves (Figure 5B–D). The generation rate of O2.− in GABA-pretreated plants decreased by 22% than that in untreated plants under heat stress (Figure 5B). Similarly, GABA-pretreated plants showed 30% and 24% decreases in H2O2 and MDA content than untreated plants in response to heat stress, respectively (Figure 5C,D). The O2.−, H2O2, and MDA of 3-MPA-pretreated plants were 34%, 24%, and 14% higher than those of untreated plants under heat stress, respectively (Figure 5A–D).

2.3. The Mediation of Endogenous GABA Level Affects HSFs Pathways during Heat Stress

Key genes involved in HSFs pathways were analyzed, including HSFs (HSFA-6a, HSFA-2c, and HSFB-2b), HSPs (HSP17.8, HSP26.7, HSP70, and HSP90.1-b1), and APX3 under normal and heat stress conditions (Figure 6, Figure 7 and Figure 8). Under normal condition, exogenous GABA and 3-MPA had no significant influences on gene expression levels of HSFs pathways. Heat stress significantly upregulated all genes involved in HSFs pathways in spite of GABA and 3-MPA pretreatment. Obviously, exogenous application of GABA further upregulated heat-induced expression of HSFA-6a, HSFA-2c, and HSFB-2b, whereas the 3-MPA application remarkably inhibited heat-induced expression of these genes. The GABA-treated plants had 51%, 50%, and 66% higher transcript levels of HSFA-6a, HSFA-2c, or HSFB-2b, respectively, than untreated plants at 15 d of heat stress (Figure 6A–C). When creeping bentgrass was subjected to 3 d of heat stress, transcript level of HSFA-6a and HSFA-2c in 3-MPA-treated plants was downregulated by 25% and 27% than that in untreated plants, respectively (Figure 6A,B). The 3-MPA-treated plants also exhibited 75% decrease in HSFB-2b expression than GABA-treated and untreated plants at 3 d of heat stress (Figure 6C). It was remarkably different in HSP17.8 expression level among untreated, GABA-treated, and 3-MPA-treated plants at 3 d of heat stress (Figure 7A). The lowest or highest HSP17.8 expression level was found in 3-MPA-treated or GABA-treated plants at 3 d of heat stress, respectively. When the duration of heat stress reached to 15 d, the GABA-treated plants had 81% increase in HSP17.8 expression relative to 3-MPA-treated plants (Figure 7A). The transcript level of HSP26.7 was significantly inhibited by exogenous 3-MPA at 15 d of heat stress (Figure 7B). The GABA application further improved heat-induced increase in HSP70 expression at 3 d of heat stress (Figure 7C). The GABA-treated or 3-MPA-treated plants had 89% or 53% increase or decrease in HSP70 expression level than untreated plants at 15 d of heat stress, respectively (Figure 7C). Similarly, the expression level of HSP90.1-b1 was upregulated by 27% in GABA-treated plants and downgraded by 30% in 3-MPA-treated plants as compared to that in untreated plants at 15 d of heat stress (Figure 7D). The APX3 expression level was markedly upregulated by GABA pretreatment and dramatically downgraded by the 3-MPA under heat stress. Compared with that in untreated control, the APX3 expression level increased by 25% or 30% in GABA-treated plants and decreased by 35% or 22% in 3-MPA-treated plants at 3 or 15 d of heat stress, respectively (Figure 8). Figure 9 shows proposed HSF pathways regulated by GABA in leaf of creeping bentgrass under heat stress.

3. Discussion

It is generally known that heat stress can reduce photosynthesis and cell membrane stability, accelerate leaf senescence, cause water loss, and inhibit normal growth and development of plants [28,29]. Previous studies have shown that the application of GABA can effectively improve the stress tolerance of various plant species under different stress conditions such as the tolerance to water deficit in black cumin (Nigella sativa) [30], the tolerance to hypoxic stress in melon (Cucumis melo) seedlings [31], and salt tolerance in cucumber (Cucumis sativus) [32]. Our present results showed that the increase in endogenous GABA content by exogenous GABA pretreatment could significantly alleviate heat-induced water loss and membrane damage in leaves of creeping bentgrass, which is consistent with previous report about effects of GABA in rice in response to high temperature stress [17]. In addition, the creeping bentgrass pretreated with GABA showed obviously higher Chl content, Fv/Fm, PIABS, Pn, and WUE than untreated plants under heat stress. In contrast, the decline in endogenous GABA content by 3-MPA application further weakened membrane stability and photosynthesis in creeping bentgrass under heat stress. These results imply that GABA-regulated heat tolerance is closely associated with the photosynthetic maintenance and delaying senescence in creeping bentgrass during heat stress. Earlier studies also found that exogenous application of GABA could effectively improve photosynthesis in pepper (Capsicum annuum) seedlings under low light stress, in pakchoi (Brassica campestris) under waterlogging stress, and in maize seedlings under salt stress [33,34,35]. The increase in WUE induced by GABA helped to reduce water loss and improve water balance when creeping bentgrass suffered from heat damage.
Plants develop very complex regulatory networks to adapt to thermal environments. Different members of HSFs participate in different regulatory processes of the heat stress response (HSR), which endows plants with heat tolerance [36,37]. In higher plants, HSPs could be divided into three categories and several subcategories according to structural characteristics and oligomerization DNA domain. There are three main types of HSFs in plants including class A members: HSF activator (HSFA) containing transcriptional activation domain AHA (aromatic, hydrophobic, and acidic amino acid residues), and class B (HSFB) and C (HSFC) without the AHA domain [37,38,39]. A previous study showed that the overexpression of Fahsfa2b and Fahsfa2c could significantly improve the heat tolerance of Arabidopsis and tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea) through activating downstream small Hsps, Hsp70, and APX2 [36]. During the seed germination and seedling stage, Arabidopsis overexpressing HsfA6a was more tolerant to salt and drought stress than wild type, and microarray and qRT-PCR analysis showed that many stress response genes were upregulated in transgenic plants [40]. The study of Ma et al. (2016) also found that the overexpression of CarHSFB2 enhanced tolerance against drought and heat stress in Arabidopsis and transcript levels of HsfA2, HsfB2a, and HsfA7a in transgenic plants were markedly higher than that in wild type in response to heat stress [41]. Our current transcriptional analyses showed that exogenous GABA could significantly upregulate transcript levels of HSFA-6a, HSFA-2c, and HSFB-2b, whereas the inhibition of GABA biosynthesis depressed these genes expression under heat stress. These results imply that GABA-induced heat tolerance involves the activation of HSFA-6a, HSFA-2c, and HSFB-2b in creeping bentgrass.
HSPs are important downstream functional genes that are regulated by HSFs [42]. As molecular chaperones, HSPs protect plants from stress damage through stabilizing proteins and ensuring proper folding and assemble of proteins. HSPs are not only induced by short-term stress shock, but also essential for heat adaptation to long-term stress [43]. It has been found that HSPs are quickly synthesized and accumulated when plants cope with high-temperature stress, which is positively correlated with heat tolerance in plants [44,45,46]. Previous study found that the heat-tolerant rice cultivar ‘Co39′ had significantly higher expression levels of small HSPs (Hsp16.9A, Hsp17.4, Hsp17.9A, and Hsp23.2) than the heat-susceptible rice cultivar “Azucena” in response to heat stress [47]. Enhanced tolerance against heat stress could be acquired by an OsHSP26 overexpression in tall fescue [48]. Appropriate dose of nitrogen could significantly improve thermotolerance of creeping bentgrass associated with increases in HSP70 and HSP90 accumulation in leaf [49]. Overexpression of five HSP90 genes (GmHsp90A2, GmHsp90A4, GmHsp90B1, GmHsp90C1.1, and GmHsp90C2.1) cloning from soybean (Gycin emax) remarkably increased thermal protection in Arabidopsis [50]. Current findings showed that the GABA could further improved heat-upregulated transcript levels of HSP17.8, HSP26.7, HSP70, and HSP90.1-b1, whereas the inhibition of GABA biosynthesis depressed these genes expression under heat stress. Current results indicate GABA regulates thermotolerance in relation to activation and upregulation of HSPs which play protective roles in stabilizing proteins when creeping bentgrass responds to heat stress.
Environmental stress can significantly increase the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) causing oxidative damage to plants. ROS can damage lipids, nucleic acids and proteins, leading to disruption of physiological processes [51]. Generally, ROS such as hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and superoxide anion (O2.−) are maintained at lower level under normal condition, but heat stress destroys dynamic balance of ROS resulting in their overaccumulation in plant cells [19]. However, plants have developed antioxidant mechanism for ROS scavenging, which plays a critical role in promoting plants adaptation to various environmental stresses. APXs are important downstream functional genes of HSFs pathways and play important roles in antioxidant metabolism in plants [38]. It is well known that superoxide dismutase (SOD) catalyzes the disproportionation of O2.− to H2O2 [27]. APX is a key enzyme involved in the ascorbic acid–glutathione (ASA–GSH) cycle and catalyzes the conversion of H2O2 to H2O and O2 using ASA-specific electronic donors [52]. Salt stress, drought, high or low temperature, strong light, and other environmental stimuli could induce APXs expression in plants [53,54,55,56,57]. It has been proved that overexpression of an Arabidopsis APX3 in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) effectively protected plants from oxidative stress [58]. Transgenic tobacco overexpressing Arabidopsis APX3 could also effectively alleviate drought-induced oxidative damage [59]. Photosystem II complexes (ΦPSII) decreased earlier in the APX3 knockout Arabidopsis mutant compared with the wild type in response to heat stress [60]. The study of Shi et al. (2001) also found that overexpression of an APX (72.1% homology to the Arabidopsis APX3) cloning from barley (Hordeum vulgare) significantly enhanced thermotolerance of Arabidopsis [53]. In this study, the increase or decrease in endogenous GABA level could enhance or inhibit heat-induced APX3 expression. Physiological analysis also proved GABA or 3-MPA effectively alleviated or aggravated heat-induced H2O2 accumulation and oxidative damage in leaves of creeping bentgrass. Thus, the GABA increased APX3 expression resulting in enhanced H2O2 scavenging ability, which effectively alleviated heat-induced oxidative damage. Current results indicate that GABA-regulated antioxidant balance largely contributes to heat tolerance in creeping bentgrass.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Materials and Treatments

Creeping bentgrass seeds (cv. Penncross, 4 g/m2) were sowed in containers (25 cm length, 15 cm width, and 10 cm height) filled with quartz sand and distilled water, and all containers were randomly placed in the growth chamber (21/18 °C (day/night), 65% relative humidity, and 750 μmol m−2·s−1 PAR) for 10 days of germination. Then, seedlings were cultivated with Hoagland’s solution [61] for another 20 days. For priming treatment, the 30-day-old plants were carefully moved out from Hoagland’s solution, and then transferred to new Hoagland’s solution containing 0.5 mmol/L GABA [14] or 2 mmol/L 3-MPA [62] (GABA or 3-MPA was dissolved in Hoagland’s solution) for 2 days. Untreated, GABA-pretreated, and 3-MPA-treated plants were then transferred into a new normal Hoagland’s solution without GABA and 3-MPA and placed in a normal growth chamber (as described above) or in a high-temperature growth chamber (38/33 °C (day/night), 65% relative humidity, and 750 μmol m−2·s−1 PAR) for 30 days. Hoagland’s solution was updated every day to avoid changes of solution concentration during normal cultivation and heat stress. All plant materials were completely placed in the growth chamber. A total of six treatments (C: control; C+GABA: control+GABA; C+3-MPA: control+3-MPA; H: heat; H+GABA: heat+GABA; H+3-MPA: heat+3-MPA) and four independent biological replicates per treatment were set. Leaves were collected for analyzing all parameters.

4.2. The Measurement of Endogenous GABA, Water Status, and Photosynthesis

The endogenous GABA content was determined by using the method of enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The Assay Kit was purchased from Shanghai Enzyme-linked Biotechnology Co., Ltd., China. Leaf EL is calculated as a percentage of Cinitial/Cmax [63]. The 0.1g fresh leaves were immersed in 30 ml deionized water and shaken for 24 h. The initial conductivity (Cinitial) is measured by conductivity meter (YSI 32, yellow spring, OH). Then, leaves were autoclaved at 120 °C for 20 min to measure the maximum conductivity of the solution (Cmax). Leaf RWC was calculated using the formula RWC (%) = [(FW − DW)/(TW ‒ DW)] × 100% [64]. Fresh leaves were collected from plants and immediately weighed for fresh weight (FW), and then leaves were immerged in distilled water for 12 h. After being gently wiped dry, turgid weight (TW) was weigh. Leaves were then dried at 80 °C for 72 h to get a dry weight (DW). For Chl content in leaves, fresh leaves (0.1 g) were soaked in 10 ml 95% alcohol and 80% acetone mixture (1:1) for 48 h in darkness, and then leaf extracts were measured at 663 and 645 nm by spectrophotometer (Spectronic in Instruments, Rochester, New York, USA). The Chl content was calculated according to the formula described in Arnon [65]. The Fv/Fm and PIABS were measured using a Chl fluorescence system (Pocket PEA, Hansatech, the United Kingdom), and a layer of leaves was adapted to darkness for 30 min using leaf clips, and the Fv/Fm ratio and PIABS were recorded. Pn and WUE of 10 individual leaves per replicate per treatment were measured by using a portable photosynthesis system (CIRAS−3, PP Systems, Norfolk, United Kingdom).

4.3. The Measurement of Oxidative Damage and Total Antioxidant Capacity

For MDA, fresh leaves (0.2 g) were ground with 50 mM cold phosphate buffer (4 mL, pH 7.8) containing 1% (w/v) polyvinylpyrrolidone. The homogenate was centrifuged at 4 °C for 30 min at 12000 g. The extraction (0.5 mL) was mixed with the reaction solution (1 mL), which contained 20% (w/v) trichloroacetic acid and 0.5% (w/v) thiobarbituric acid. The mixture is heated for 15 min in a water bath at 95 °C and then cooled rapidly in an ice–water bath. The homogenate was centrifuged at 8000 g for 10 min. The absorbance of supernatant was measured at 532, 600 and 450 nm [66]. For O2−, 0.1 g of leaves was ground with 1.5 mL 65 mM PBS (pH 7.8) and centrifuged at 4 °C for 30 min at 10000 g to collect supernatant. Reaction mixture containing supernatant (0.5 mL), PBS (0.5 mL), and 10 mM hydrochloride (0.1 mL) was incubated in water bath (25 °C) for 20 min, and then 2 mL mixed solution (58 mM sulfonamide and 7 mM alpha-naphthylamine) was added to the reaction mixture for 20 min in 25 °C water bath. The chloroform (2 mL) was added to reaction mixture. Absorption was measured at 530 nm [67]. The content of H2O2 was determined as follows. Leaves (0.1 g) were homogenized with 5 mL 0.1% TCA and centrifuged for 20 min at 12000 g, and the supernatant (0.5 mL) mixed with 10 mM potassium phosphate (0.5 mL) and KI (1 mL). Oxidation products were measured at 390 nm [68]. The TAC was measured using the Assay Kit (Suzhou Comin Biotechnology Co., Ltd., China) according to manufacturer’s instructions.

4.4. Genes Expression Analyses

Genes transcription levels were detected by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). Total RNA was extracted from 0.15 g fresh leaves by using Rneasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Duesseldorf, Germany). The RNA was reverse-transcribed to the cDNA using a revert Aid First Stand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Fermentas, Lithuania). Primers of heat shock factor genes (HSFA-6a, HSFA-2c, and HSFB-2b), heat shock protein genes (HSP17.8, HSP26.7, HSP70, and HSP90.1-b1), and the gene encoding ascorbate peroxidase 3 (APX3) were used for qPCR (Table 1); β-Actin was used as the internal control. The PCR protocol conditions for all genes as follows; 5 min at 94 °C and 30 s at 95 °C (40 repeats of denaturation), annealing 45 s at 58–64 °C, and amplicon from 60 to 95°C. Transcript levels of all genes were calculated according to the formula 2−∆∆Ct described by Xia et al. [69].

4.5. Statistical Analysis

The data was analyzed by using SPSS 20 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA) and the SAS (SAS 9.1, SAS Institute, Cary, NC). Differences among treatments were tested by using Fisher’s protected least significance (LSD) test (Dunnett’s test) at a 0.05 probability level. The two-way ANOVA was made before using the Fisher’s LSD.

5. Conclusions

The mediation of endogenous GABA level could significantly affect heat tolerance in perennial creeping bentgrass. The GABA pretreatment is an effective way to improve heat tolerance of creeping bentgrass through effectively maintaining water balance, enhancing photosynthesis, and reducing oxidative damage caused by high temperature stress. On the contrary, the inhibition of GABA accumulation by the application of GABA biosynthesis inhibitor (3-MPA) further aggravates heat damage in leaves of creeping bentgrass. More importantly, the current results indicate that the GABA-regulated thermotolerance is associated with the activation and enhancement of HSF pathways in creeping bentgrass. The GABA significantly upregulates transcript levels of genes encoding heat shock factors (HSFA-6a, HSFA-2c, and HSFB-2b), heat shock proteins (HSP17.8, HSP26.7, HSP70, and HSP90.1-b1), and ascorbate peroxidase 3 (APX3), whereas the inhibition of GABA biosynthesis depressed these genes expression during heat stress. Further research is still needed about thermal stress signal transduction induced by GABA in plants.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Z.L. (Zhou Li); Formal Analysis, T.L.; Investigation, T.L.; Z.L. (Zhaoqiao Liu); and L.H. (Liwen He); Resources, Z.L. (Zhou Li); Y.P.; and X.Z.; Data Curation, T.L. and Z.L. (Zhaoqiao Liu); Writing—Original Draft Preparation, T.L.; Writing—Review and Editing, Z.L. (Zhou Li); G.N.; and W.L.; Supervision, Z.L. (Zhou Li); X.M.; and L.H. (Linkai Huang); Project Administration, Z.L. (Zhou Li); Funding Acquisition, Z.L. (Zhou Li).

Funding

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 31702182) and the Sichuan International Cooperation Project (Grant No. 2017HH0060).

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Bizhen Cheng and Mr. Weihang Zeng (Sichuan Agricultural University, China) for providing technical support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wahid:, A.; Gelani, S.; Ashraf, M.; Foolad, M.R. Heat tolerance in plants: An overview. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2007, 61, 199–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zhao, J.Y.; Liu, J.M.; Feng, Z.J.; Chen, M.; Zhou, Y.B.; Chen, J.; Zhaoshi, X.U.; Guo, C.H. The response to heat and screening of the interacting proteins of zinc finger protein Gm Di19–5 in soybean. Sci. Agric. Sin. 2017, 50, 2389–2398. [Google Scholar]
  3. Christine, K.; Joshua, H.; Bonos, S.A. Characterization of 215 simple sequence repeat markers in creeping bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera L.). Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2011, 11, 872–876. [Google Scholar]
  4. Hacisalihoglu, G.; Ross, Z. Effectiveness of seed matriconditioning on germination and storability parameters of creeping bentgrass. Proc. Meet. Fla. State Hortic. Soc. 2009, 122, 414–415. [Google Scholar]
  5. Chakraborty, N.; Bae, J.; Warnke, S.; Chang, T.; Jung, G. Linkage map construction in allotetraploid creeping bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera L.). Tag.Theor. Appl. Genet. Theor. Und Angew. Genet. 2005, 111, 795–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Savvides, A.; Ali, S.; Tester, M.; Fotopoulos, V. Chemical priming of plants against multiple abiotic stresses: mission possible? Trends Plant Sci. 2016, 21, 329–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Long, W.; Munshaw, G.; Stewart, B.R.; Massey, J.H.; Lemus, R.W. The effect of exogenous fructose on creeping bentgrass heat tolerance; Mississippi State University: Starkville, MS, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  8. Larkindale, J.; Huang, B. Effects of abscisic acid, salicylic acid, ethylene and hydrogen peroxide in thermotolerance and recovery for creeping bentgrass. Plant Growth Regul. 2005, 47, 17–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Seher, Y.; Filiz, O.; Melike, B. Gamma-amino butyric acid, glutamate dehydrogenase and glutamate decarboxylase levels in phylogenetically divergent plants. Plant Syst. Evol. 2013, 299, 403–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Chen, Z.; Tang, J.; Sun, Y.Q.; Xie, J. Protective effect of γ-aminobutyric acid on antioxidation function in intestinal mucosa of Wenchang chicken induced by heat stress. J. Anim. Plant Sci. 2013, 23, 1634–1641. [Google Scholar]
  11. Cheng, J.B.; Bu, D.P.; Wang, J.Q.; Sun, X.Z.; Pan, L.; Zhou, L.Y.; Liu, W. Effects of rumen-protected γ-aminobutyric acid on performance and nutrient digestibility in heat-stressed dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2014, 97, 5599–5607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Bouche, N.; Fromm, H. GABA in plants: Just a metabolite? Trends Plant Sci. 2004, 9, 110–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Fait, A.; Fromm, H.; Walter, D.; Galili, G.; Fernie, A.R. Highway or byway: The metabolic role of the GABA shunt in plants. Trends Plant Sci. 2008, 13, 14–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Li, Z.; Yu, J.; Peng, Y.; Huang, B. Metabolic pathways regulated by γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) contributing to heat tolerance in creeping bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera). Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 30338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Vijayakumari, K.; Puthur, J.T. γ-Aminobutyric acid (GABA) priming enhances the osmotic stress tolerance in Piper nigrum Linn. plants subjected to PEG-induced stress. Plant Growth Regul. 2015, 78, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Aghdam, M.S.; Naderi, R.; Jannatizadeh, A.; Babalar, M.; Sarcheshmeh, M.A.A.; Faradonbe, M.Z. Impact of exogenous GABA treatments on endogenous GABA metabolism in anthurium cut flowers in response to postharvest chilling temperature. Plant Physiol. Biochem. Ppb 2016, 106, 11–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Nayyar, H.; Kaur, R.; Kaur, S.; Singh, R. γ-Aminobutyric acid (GABA) imparts partial protection from heat stress injury to rice seedlings by improving leaf turgor and upregulating osmoprotectants and antioxidants. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2014, 33, 408–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Locy, R.D.; Wu, S.J.; Bisnette, J.; Barger, T.W.; Mcnabb, D.; Zik, M.; Fromm, H.; Singh, N.K.; Cherry, J.H. The Regulation of GABA Accumulation by Heat Stress in Arabidopsis. In Plant Tolerance to Abiotic Stresses in Agriculture: Role of Genetic Engineering; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2000; pp. 39–52. [Google Scholar]
  19. Liu, X.; Huang, B. Heat stress injury in relation to membrane lipid peroxidation in creeping bentgrass. Crop Sci. 2000, 40, 503–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Jiang, Y.; Huang, B. Osmotic adjustment and root growth associated with drought preconditioning-enhanced heat tolerance in Kentucky bluegrass. Crop Sci. 2001, 41, 1168–1173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yang, X.T.; Zhang, Z.Q.; Joyce, D.; Huang, X.M.; Xu, L.Y.; Pang, X.Q. Characterization of chlorophyll degradation in banana and plantain during ripening at high temperature. Food Chem. 2009, 114, 383–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Czarnecka-sVerner, E.; Yuan, C.-X.; Nover, L.; Scharf, K.-D.; Englich, G.; Gurley, W.B. Plant heat shock transcription factors: Positive and negative aspects of regulation. Acta Physiol. Plant. 1997, 19, 529–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Mittler, R.; Finka, A.; Goloubinoff, P. How do plants feel the heat? Trends Biochem. Sci. 2012, 37, 118–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Wang, X.; Huang, W.; Yang, Z.; Liu, J.; Huang, B. Transcriptional regulation of heat shock proteins and ascorbate peroxidase by CtHsfA2b from African bermudagrass conferring heat tolerance in Arabidopsis. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 28021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Xu, Y.; Zhan, C.; Huang, B. Heat shock proteins in association with heat tolerance in grasses. Int. J. Proteom. 2011, 2011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Vierling, E. The Roles of Heat Shock Proteins in Plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol.Plant Mol. Biol 2003, 42, 579–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Jaleel, C.A.; Riadh, K.; Gopi, R.; Manivannan, P.; Inès, J.; Al-Juburi, H.J.; Zhao, C.X.; Shao, H.B.; Panneerselvam, R. Antioxidant defense responses: Physiological plasticity in higher plants under abiotic constraints. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2009, 31, 427–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Morales, M.A. High temperature effects on photosynthetic activity of two tomato cultivars with different heat susceptibility. J. Plant Physiol. 2005, 162, 281–289. [Google Scholar]
  29. Zhu, X.; Shen, H. Effect of high temperature stress on cell membrane in celery seedlings. North. Hortic. 2014, 7, 16–20. [Google Scholar]
  30. Rezaei-Chiyaneh, E.; Seyyedi, S.M.; Ebrahimian, E.; Moghaddam, S.S.; Damalas, C.A. Exogenous application of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) alleviates the effect of water deficit stress in black cumin (Nigella sativa L.). Ind. Crops Prod. 2018, 112, 741–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wang, C.Y.; Jing-Rui, L.I.; Xia, Q.P.; Xiao-Lei, W.U.; Gao, H.B. Influence of exogenous γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) on GABA metabolism and amino acid contents in roots of melon seedling under hypoxia stress. Chin. J. Appl. Ecol. 2014, 25, 2011–2018. [Google Scholar]
  32. Gao, H.B.; Zhang, T.J.; Gui-Yun, L.; Xiao-Lei, W.U.; Zhou, Z.N. Effects of exogenous γ-aminobutyric acid on growth and reactive oxygen species metabolism of cucumber seedlings under NaCl stress. Acta Bot. Boreali-Occident. Sin. 2007, 27, 2046–2051. [Google Scholar]
  33. Wang, Y.; Gu, W.; Meng, Y.; Xie, T.; Li, L.; Li, J.; Wei, S. γ-Aminobutyric acid imparts partial protection from salt stress injury to maize seedlings by improving photosynthesis and upregulating osmoprotectants and antioxidants. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 43609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Liu, J.P.; Xiao-Feng, L.I.; Zhu, H.F.; Zhu, Y.Y.; Hou, X.L.; University, N.A. Effects of γ-aminobutyric acid on the growth and photosynthesis of Pakchoi under waterlogging stress. Acta Agric. Shanghai 2016, 32, 55–59. [Google Scholar]
  35. Li, Y.; Fan, Y.; Ma, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Yue, H.; Wang, L.; Li, J.; Jiao, Y. Effects of exogenous γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) on photosynthesis and antioxidant system in pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) seedlings under low light stress. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2017, 36, 436–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wang, X.; Huang, W.; Liu, J.; Yang, Z.; Huang, B. Molecular regulation and physiological functions of a novel FaHsfA2c cloned from tall fescue conferring plant tolerance to heat stress. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2017, 15, 237–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Scharf, K.-D.; Berberich, T.; Ebersberger, I.; Nover, L. The plant heat stress transcription factor (Hsf) family: Structure, function and evolution. Biochim. et Biophys. Acta (BBA)-Gene Regul. Mech. 2012, 1819, 104–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Pascal, K.D.R.; Klaus-Dieter, S.; Lutz, N. The diversity of plant heat stress transcription factors. Trends Plant Sci. 2007, 12, 452–457. [Google Scholar]
  39. Nover, L.; Bharti, K.; D.?Ring, P.; Mishra, S.K.; Ganguli, A.; Scharf, K.D. Arabidopsis and the heat stress transcription factor world: How many heat stress transcription factors do we need? Cell Stress Chaperones 2001, 6, 177–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Hwang, S.M.; Kim, D.W.; Woo, M.S.; Jeong, H.S.; Son, Y.S.; Akhter, S.; Choi, G.J.; Bahk, J.D. Functional characterization of Arabidopsis HsfA6a as a heat-shock transcription factor under high salinity and dehydration conditions. Plant Cell Environ. 2014, 37, 1202–1222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ma, H.; Wang, C.; Yang, B.; Cheng, H.; Wang, Z.; Mijiti, A.; Ren, C.; Qu, G.; Zhang, H.; Ma, L. CarHSFB2, a Class B Heat shock transcription factor, is involved in different developmental processes and various stress responses in Chickpea (Cicer Arietinum L.). Plant Mol. Biol. Report. 2015, 34, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Baniwal, S.K.; Bharti, K.; Chan, K.Y.; Fauth, M.; Ganguli, A.; Kotak, S.; Mishra, S.K.; Nover, L.; Port, M.; Scharf, K.D. Heat stress response in plants: A complex game with chaperones and more than twenty heat stress transcription factors. J. Biosci. 2004, 29, 471–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Timperio, A.M.; Egidi, M.G.; Zolla, L. Proteomics applied on plant abiotic stresses: Role of heat shock proteins (HSP). J. Proteom. 2008, 71, 391–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Huang, B.X. Chenping. Identification and characterization of proteins associated with plant tolerance to heat stress. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2010, 50, 1230–1237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Schramm, F.; Ganguli, A.; Kiehlmann, E.; Englich, G.; Walch, D.; von Koskull-Döring, P. The heat stress transcription factor HsfA2 serves as a regulatory amplifier of a subset of genes in the heat stress response in Arabidopsis. Plant Mol. Biol. 2006, 60, 759–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Haslbeck, M. sHsps and their role in the chaperone network. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. CMLS 2002, 59, 1649–1657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Chen, X.; Lin, S.; Liu, Q.; Jian, H.; Zhang, W.; Lin, J.; Wang, Y.; Ke, Y.; He, H. Expression and interaction of small heat shock proteins (sHsps) in rice in response to heat stress. BB-Proteins Proteom. 2014, 1844, 818–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kim, K.H.; Alam, I.; Kim, Y.G.; Sharmin, S.A.; Lee, K.W.; Lee, S.H.; Lee, B.H. Overexpression of a chloroplast-localized small heat shock protein OsHSP26 confers enhanced tolerance against oxidative and heat stresses in tall fescue. Biotechnol. Lett. 2012, 34, 371–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Wang, K.; Zhang, X.; Goatley, M.; Ervin, E. Heat shock proteins in relation to heat stress tolerance of creeping bentgrass at different N levels. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e102914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Jinyan, X.; Chenchen, X.; Dong, X.; Jinming, Z.; Junyi, G.; Na, G.; Han, X. Overexpression of GmHsp90s, a heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90) gene family cloning from soybean, decrease damage of abiotic stresses in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e69810. [Google Scholar]
  51. Gill, S.S.; Tuteja, N. Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant machinery in abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2010, 48, 909–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Caverzan, A.; Passaia, G.; Rosa, S.B.; Ribeiro, C.W.; Lazzarotto, F.; Margispinheiro, M. Plant responses to stresses: Role of ascorbate peroxidase in the antioxidant protection. Genet. Mol. Biol. 2012, 35, 1011–1019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Shi, W.M.; Muramoto, Y.; Ueda, A.; Takabe, T. Cloning of peroxisomal ascorbate peroxidase gene from barley and enhanced thermotolerance by overexpressing in Arabidopsis thaliana. Gene 2001, 273, 23–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Yoshimura, K. Expression of spinach ascorbate peroxidase isoenzymes in response to oxidative stresses. Plant Physiol. 2000, 123, 223–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Agrawal, G.K.; Jwa, N.-S.; Iwahashi, H.; Rakwal, R. Importance of ascorbate peroxidases OsAPX1 and OsAPX2 in the rice pathogen response pathways and growth and reproduction revealed by their transcriptional profiling. Gene 2003, 322, 93–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Menezes-Benavente, L.; Teixeira, F.K.; Kamei, C.L.A.; Margis-Pinheiro, M. Salt stress induces altered expression of genes encoding antioxidant enzymes in seedlings of a Brazilian indica rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Sci. 2004, 166, 323–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Fryer, M.J.; Ball, L.; Oxborough, K.; Karpinski, S.; Mullineaux, P.M.; Baker, N.R. Control of ascorbate peroxidase 2 expression by hydrogen peroxide and leaf water status during excess light stress reveals a functional organisation of Arabidopsis leaves. Plant J. 2010, 33, 691–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Wang, J.; Zhang, H.; Allen, R.D. Overexpression of an Arabidopsis peroxisomal ascorbate peroxidase gene in tobacco increases protection against oxidative stress. Plant Cell Physiol. 1999, 40, 725–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Yan, J.; Jing, W.; Tissue, D.; Holaday, A.S.; Allen, R.; Hong, Z. Photosynthesis and seed production under water-deficit conditions in transgenic tobacco plants that overexpress an ascorbate peroxidase gene. Crop Sci. 2003, 43, 1477–1483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Narendra, S.; Venkataramani, S.; Shen, G.; Wang, J.; Pasapula, V.; Lin, Y.; Kornyeyev, D.; Holaday, A.S.; Zhang, H. The Arabidopsis ascorbate peroxidase 3 is a peroxisomal membrane-bound antioxidant enzyme and is dispensable for Arabidopsis growth and development. J. Exp. Botany 2006, 57, 3033–3042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Hoagland, D.R.; Arnon, D.I. The water-culture method for growing plants without soil. Calif. Agric. Exp. Stn. Circ. 1950, 347, 357–359. [Google Scholar]
  62. Yu, G.H.; Zou, J.; Feng, J.; Peng, X.B.; Wu, J.Y.; Wu, Y.L.; Palanivelu, R.; Sun, M.X. Exogenous γ-aminobutyric acid affects pollen tube growth via modulating putative Ca2+-permeable membrane channels and is coupled to negative regulation on glutamate decarboxylase. J. Exp. Botany 2014, 65, 3235–3248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Blum, A.; Ebercon, A. Cell membrane stability as a measure of drought and heat tolerance in wheat 1. Crop Sci. 1981, 21, 43–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Barr, H.D.; Weatherley, P.E. A reexamination of the relative turgidity technique for estimating water deficit in leaves. Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 1962, 15, 413–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Arnon, D.I. Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts. Polyphenoloxidase in beta vulgaris. Plant Physiol. 1949, 24, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Dhindsa, R.S.; Plumbdhindsa, P.; Thorpe, T.A. Leaf senescence: correlated with increased levels of membrane permeability and lipid peroxidation, and decreased levels of superoxide dismutase and catalase. J. Exp. Botany 1981, 32, 93–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Elstner, E.F.; Heupel, A. Inhibition of nitrite formation from hydroxylammoniumchloride: A simple assay for superoxide dismutase. Anal. Biochem. 1976, 70, 616–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Velikova, V.; Yordanov, I.; Edreva, A. Oxidative stress and some antioxidant systems in acid rain-treated bean plants: Protective role of exogenous polyamines. Plant Sci. 2000, 151, 59–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Xiao-Jian, X. Reactive oxygen species are involved in brassinosteroid-induced stress tolerance in cucumber. Plant Physiol. 2009, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijms 20 04713 g001 550
Figure 1. Effects of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and 3-mercaptopropionic acid (3-MPA) on endogenous GABA content in leaf of creeping bentgrass at 30 d of 23/18 (normal condition) or 38/33 °C (heat stress). Vertical bars above columns indicate ±standard error (SE) of means (n = 4) and different letters above columns indicate significant differences (p ≤ 0.05). C: control; C+GABA: control+GABA; C+3-MPA: control+3-MPA; H: heat; H+GABA: heat+GABA; H+3-MPA: heat+3-MPA.
Figure 1. Effects of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and 3-mercaptopropionic acid (3-MPA) on endogenous GABA content in leaf of creeping bentgrass at 30 d of 23/18 (normal condition) or 38/33 °C (heat stress). Vertical bars above columns indicate ±standard error (SE) of means (n = 4) and different letters above columns indicate significant differences (p ≤ 0.05). C: control; C+GABA: control+GABA; C+3-MPA: control+3-MPA; H: heat; H+GABA: heat+GABA; H+3-MPA: heat+3-MPA.
Ijms 20 04713 g001
Ijms 20 04713 g002 550
Figure 2. Effects of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and 3-mercaptopropionic acid (3-MPA) on (A) relative water content (RWC) and (B) electrolyte leakage (EL) in leaf of creeping bentgrass during 30 days of 23/18 (normal condition) or 38/33 °C (heat stress). Vertical bars below curves represent least significance difference (LSD) values at a given day of treatment (p ≤ 0.05). C: control; C+GABA: control+GABA; C+3-MPA: control+3-MPA; H: heat; H+GABA: heat+GABA; H+3-MPA: heat+3-MPA.
Figure 2. Effects of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and 3-mercaptopropionic acid (3-MPA) on (A) relative water content (RWC) and (B) electrolyte leakage (EL) in leaf of creeping bentgrass during 30 days of 23/18 (normal condition) or 38/33 °C (heat stress). Vertical bars below curves represent least significance difference (LSD) values at a given day of treatment (p ≤ 0.05). C: control; C+GABA: control+GABA; C+3-MPA: control+3-MPA; H: heat; H+GABA: heat+GABA; H+3-MPA: heat+3-MPA.
Ijms 20 04713 g002
Ijms 20 04713 g003 550
Figure 3. Effects of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and 3-mercaptopropionic acid (3-MPA) on (A) chlorophyll (Chl) a content, (B) Chl b content, and (C) total Chl content in leaf of creeping bentgrass during 30 days of 23/18 (normal condition) or 38/33 °C (heat stress). Vertical bars above columns indicate ±standard error (SE) of means (n = 4) and different letters above columns indicate significant differences (p ≤ 0.05). C: control; C+GABA: control + GABA; C+3-MPA: control+3-MPA; H: heat; H+GABA: heat+GABA; H+3-MPA: heat+3-MPA.
Figure 3. Effects of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and 3-mercaptopropionic acid (3-MPA) on (A) chlorophyll (Chl) a content, (B) Chl b content, and (C) total Chl content in leaf of creeping bentgrass during 30 days of 23/18 (normal condition) or 38/33 °C (heat stress). Vertical bars above columns indicate ±standard error (SE) of means (n = 4) and different letters above columns indicate significant differences (p ≤ 0.05). C: control; C+GABA: control + GABA; C+3-MPA: control+3-MPA; H: heat; H+GABA: heat+GABA; H+3-MPA: heat+3-MPA.
Ijms 20 04713 g003
Ijms 20 04713 g004 550
Figure 4. Effects of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and 3-mercaptopropionic acid (3-MPA) on (A) photochemical efficiency (Fv/Fm), (B) performance index on absorption (PIABS), (C) net photosynthesis rate (Pn), and (D) water use efficiency (WUE) in leaf of creeping bentgrass during 30 days of 23/18 (normal condition) or 38/33 °C (heat stress). Vertical bars below curves represent least significance difference (LSD) values at a given day of treatment (p ≤ 0.05); vertical bars above columns indicate ±standard error (SE) of means (n = 4) and different letters above columns indicate significant differences (p ≤ 0.05). C: control; C+GABA: control+GABA; C+3-MPA: control+3-MPA; H: heat; H+GABA: heat + GABA; H+3-MPA: heat+3-MPA.
Figure 4. Effects of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and 3-mercaptopropionic acid (3-MPA) on (A) photochemical efficiency (Fv/Fm), (B) performance index on absorption (PIABS), (C) net photosynthesis rate (Pn), and (D) water use efficiency (WUE) in leaf of creeping bentgrass during 30 days of 23/18 (normal condition) or 38/33 °C (heat stress). Vertical bars below curves represent least significance difference (LSD) values at a given day of treatment (p ≤ 0.05); vertical bars above columns indicate ±standard error (SE) of means (n = 4) and different letters above columns indicate significant differences (p ≤ 0.05). C: control; C+GABA: control+GABA; C+3-MPA: control+3-MPA; H: heat; H+GABA: heat + GABA; H+3-MPA: heat+3-MPA.
Ijms 20 04713 g004
Ijms 20 04713 g005 550
Figure 5. Effects of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and 3-mercaptopropionic acid (3-MPA) on (A) total antioxidant capacity (TAC), (B) superoxide anion (O2.−), (C) hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), and (D) malondialdehyde (MDA) content in leaf of creeping bentgrass at 30 d of 23/18 (normal condition) or 38/33 °C (heat stress). Vertical bars above columns indicate ±standard error (SE) of means (n = 4) and different letters above columns indicate significant differences (p ≤ 0.05). C: control; C+GABA: control + GABA; C+3-MPA: control+3-MPA; H: heat; H+GABA: heat + GABA; H+3-MPA: heat+3-MPA.
Figure 5. Effects of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and 3-mercaptopropionic acid (3-MPA) on (A) total antioxidant capacity (TAC), (B) superoxide anion (O2.−), (C) hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), and (D) malondialdehyde (MDA) content in leaf of creeping bentgrass at 30 d of 23/18 (normal condition) or 38/33 °C (heat stress). Vertical bars above columns indicate ±standard error (SE) of means (n = 4) and different letters above columns indicate significant differences (p ≤ 0.05). C: control; C+GABA: control + GABA; C+3-MPA: control+3-MPA; H: heat; H+GABA: heat + GABA; H+3-MPA: heat+3-MPA.
Ijms 20 04713 g005
Ijms 20 04713 g006 550
Figure 6. Effects of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and 3-mercaptopropionic acid (3-MPA) on (A) HSFA-2a, (B) HSFA-2c, and (C) HSFB-2b relative expression in leaves of creeping bentgrass at 3 and 15 d of 23/18 (normal condition) or 38/33 °C (heat stress). Vertical bars above columns indicate ±standard error (SE) of means (n = 4) and different letters above columns indicate significant differences (p ≤ 0.05). C: control; C+GABA: control + GABA; C+3-MPA: control+3-MPA; H: heat; H+GABA: heat + GABA; H+3-MPA: heat+3-MPA.
Figure 6. Effects of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and 3-mercaptopropionic acid (3-MPA) on (A) HSFA-2a, (B) HSFA-2c, and (C) HSFB-2b relative expression in leaves of creeping bentgrass at 3 and 15 d of 23/18 (normal condition) or 38/33 °C (heat stress). Vertical bars above columns indicate ±standard error (SE) of means (n = 4) and different letters above columns indicate significant differences (p ≤ 0.05). C: control; C+GABA: control + GABA; C+3-MPA: control+3-MPA; H: heat; H+GABA: heat + GABA; H+3-MPA: heat+3-MPA.
Ijms 20 04713 g006
Ijms 20 04713 g007 550
Figure 7. Effects of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and 3-mercaptopropionic acid (3-MPA) on (A) HSP17.8 (B) HSP26.7, (C) HSP70, and (D) HSP90.1-b1 relative expression in leaves of creeping bentgrass at 3 and 15 d of 23/18 (normal condition) or 38/33 °C (heat stress). Vertical bars above columns indicate ±standard error (SE) of means (n = 4) and different letters above columns indicate significant differences (p ≤ 0.05). C: control; C+GABA: control + GABA; C+3-MPA: control+3-MPA; H: heat; H+GABA: heat+GABA; H+3-MPA: heat+3-MPA.
Figure 7. Effects of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and 3-mercaptopropionic acid (3-MPA) on (A) HSP17.8 (B) HSP26.7, (C) HSP70, and (D) HSP90.1-b1 relative expression in leaves of creeping bentgrass at 3 and 15 d of 23/18 (normal condition) or 38/33 °C (heat stress). Vertical bars above columns indicate ±standard error (SE) of means (n = 4) and different letters above columns indicate significant differences (p ≤ 0.05). C: control; C+GABA: control + GABA; C+3-MPA: control+3-MPA; H: heat; H+GABA: heat+GABA; H+3-MPA: heat+3-MPA.
Ijms 20 04713 g007
Ijms 20 04713 g008 550
Figure 8. Effects of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and 3-mercaptopropionic acid (3-MPA) on APX3 relative expression in leaves of creeping bentgrass at 3 and 15 d of 23/18 (normal condition) or 38/33 °C (heat stress). Vertical bars above columns indicate ±standard error (SE) of means (n = 4) and different letters above columns indicate significant differences (p ≤ 0.05). C: control; C+GABA: control + GABA; C+3-MPA: control+3-MPA; H: heat; H+GABA: heat+GABA; H+3-MPA: heat+3-MPA.
Figure 8. Effects of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and 3-mercaptopropionic acid (3-MPA) on APX3 relative expression in leaves of creeping bentgrass at 3 and 15 d of 23/18 (normal condition) or 38/33 °C (heat stress). Vertical bars above columns indicate ±standard error (SE) of means (n = 4) and different letters above columns indicate significant differences (p ≤ 0.05). C: control; C+GABA: control + GABA; C+3-MPA: control+3-MPA; H: heat; H+GABA: heat+GABA; H+3-MPA: heat+3-MPA.
Ijms 20 04713 g008
Ijms 20 04713 g009 550
Figure 9. Proposed heat shock factor pathways regulated by γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) in creeping bentgrass under heat stress.
Figure 9. Proposed heat shock factor pathways regulated by γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) in creeping bentgrass under heat stress.
Ijms 20 04713 g009
Table
Table 1. Primer sequences and annealing temperature of analyzed genes.
Table 1. Primer sequences and annealing temperature of analyzed genes.
Target GeneChromosomeForward Primer (5’-3’)Reverse Primer (5’-3’)Tm (◦C)
HSFA-2c3GCCGTCCAATGTGCCTCCATCCGCTTCAGCCTGTCAATCTCTTCC62
HSFA-6a1CACCTTCGAGGAGCTGGCATTGTGTCTATCTCCGCCTGCTCATCC62
HSFB-2b8GCTGGAGAACTCACGGCTAACGCTGCTGAGTGTCGCTGTACTTGG62
HSP17.85GGCGACATCAAGGTGCAGGTGACTTGGCGTCCTCCTTCTCCTC62
HSP26.74GCGGCGAGCACAAGAAGGAGGACCTGCACGTCGATGACCTTG64
HSP702GCTGAGGATGACGAAGACGAAGACATCGGCGTTGACGTGAACCATC60
HSP90.1-b15ACGAAGTGATCTTCATGGTGGATGCTGTCGCCGAGAATGTCCTTGAT64
APX33GGCTCAAGATCGCAGTCGTGGTAGAGGTCGGCATACG58
β-Actin5CCTTTTCCAGCCATCTTTCAGAGGTCCTTCCTGATATCCA58

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, T.; Liu, Z.; Li, Z.; Peng, Y.; Zhang, X.; Ma, X.; Huang, L.; Liu, W.; Nie, G.; He, L. Regulation of Heat Shock Factor Pathways by γ-aminobutyric Acid (GABA) Associated with Thermotolerance of Creeping Bentgrass. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 4713. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20194713

AMA Style

Liu T, Liu Z, Li Z, Peng Y, Zhang X, Ma X, Huang L, Liu W, Nie G, He L. Regulation of Heat Shock Factor Pathways by γ-aminobutyric Acid (GABA) Associated with Thermotolerance of Creeping Bentgrass. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2019; 20(19):4713. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20194713

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Ting, Zhaoqiao Liu, Zhou Li, Yan Peng, Xinquan Zhang, Xiao Ma, Linkai Huang, Wei Liu, Gang Nie, and Liwen He. 2019. "Regulation of Heat Shock Factor Pathways by γ-aminobutyric Acid (GABA) Associated with Thermotolerance of Creeping Bentgrass" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 20, no. 19: 4713. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20194713

APA Style

Liu, T., Liu, Z., Li, Z., Peng, Y., Zhang, X., Ma, X., Huang, L., Liu, W., Nie, G., & He, L. (2019). Regulation of Heat Shock Factor Pathways by γ-aminobutyric Acid (GABA) Associated with Thermotolerance of Creeping Bentgrass. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 20(19), 4713. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20194713

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop