Promoting Consumer Engagement in Online Communities through Virtual Experience and Social Identity
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Theoretical Background and Hypothesis Development
2.1. Online Game
2.2. Massive Multiplayer Online Role-Playing Games
2.3. Virtual Experience
2.3.1. Social Presence
2.3.2. Telepresence
2.4. Social Identity
2.4.1. Cognitive Social Identity
2.4.2. Affective Social Identity
2.5. Consumer Engagement
3. Methods
3.1. Measures of the Constructs
3.2. Data Collection
4. Results
4.1. Measurement Model
4.2. Common Method Bias
4.3. Structural Model
5. Discussion
6. Limitations and Future Research
7. Conclusions
7.1. Theoretical Implications
7.2. Managerial Implications
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A. Measurements Scales (Strongly Disagree/Agree, 1–7 Scale)
- Social Presence (adapted from [10])
- SP1 In my interactions with other members, I am able to be myself and show what kind of member/person I really am.
- SP2 I trust that other members in this online gaming community will help me if I need it.
- SP3 I feel connected to other players in this online gaming community.
- Telepresence (adapted from [23])
- TP1 Being in this online gaming community often makes me forget where I am
- TP2 After using this online gaming community, I feel like I come back to the "real world" after a journey.
- TP3 This online gaming community creates a new world for me, and this world suddenly disappears when I stop using it.
- Cognitive Social Identity (adapted from [45])
- CSI1 In this online gaming community, my personal identity and the identity of this community is similar to that of other members.
- CSI2 In this online gaming community, my self-image is similar to that of other members.
- CSI3 In this online gaming community, my perspective of online games is similar to that of other members.
- Affective Social Identity (adapted from [45])
- ASI1 I feel a strong sense of being part of this online gaming community.
- ASI2 I am very attached to this online gaming community.
- ASI3 I enjoy myself as a member of this online gaming community.
- Psychological Engagement (adapted from [60])
- PE1 I feel strong and vigorous when I am using this online gaming community.
- PE2 I am enthusiastic in this online gaming community.
- PE3 Using this online gaming community is absorbing and immersive.
- Behavioral Engagement (adapted from [60])
- BE1 I am willing to actively participate in the activities in this online gaming community.
- BE2 I am willing to support other members in this online gaming community.
- BE3 I will recommend this online gaming community to anyone seeking advice about online gaming communities.
References
- Kim, M.G.; Kim, J. Cross-validation of reliability, convergent and discriminant validity for the problematic online game use scale. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2010, 26, 389–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lo, S.; Wang, C.; Fang, W. Physical interpersonal relationships and social anxiety among online game players. Cyberpsychol. Behav. 2005, 8, 15–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, H.; Mori, Y.; Matsuba, I. Solving the balance problem of massively multiplayer online role-playing games using coevolutionary programming. Appl. Soft Comput. 2014, 18, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Codini, A.; Abbate, T.; Aquilani, B. Knowledge co-creation in open innovation digital platforms: Processes, tools and services abstract. J. Bus. Ind. Mark. 2019, 34, 1434–1447. [Google Scholar]
- Paschen, J.; Kietzmann, J.; Kietzmann, T. Artificial intelligence (AI) and its implications for market knowledge in B2B marketing. J. Bus. Ind. Mark. 2019, 34, 1410–1419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, J.; Flaherty, K.; Sohi, R.S.; Deeter-Schmelz, D.; Habel, J.; Le Meunier-FitzHugh, K.; Malshe, A.; Mullins, R.; Onyemah, V. Sales profession and professionals in the age of digitization and artificial intelligence technologies: Concepts, priorities, and questions. J. Pers. Sell. Sales Manag. 2019, 39, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Syam, N.; Sharma, A. Waiting for a sales renaissance in the fourth industrial revolution: Machine learning and artificial intelligence in sales research and practice. Ind. Mark. Manag. 2018, 69, 135–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Verhoef, P.C.; Reinartz, W.I.; Krafft, M. Customer engagement behavior: Theoretical foundations and research directions. J. Serv. Res. 2010, 13, 247–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chan, T.K.H.; Zheng, X.; Cheung, C.M.K.; Lee, M.K.O.; Lee, Z.W.Y. Antecedents and consequences of customer engagement in online brand communities. J. Mark. Anal. 2014, 2, 81–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yee, N. The demographics, motivations and derived experiences of users of massively multi-user online graphical environment. Presence Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 2006, 15, 309–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghazali, E.; Mutum, D.; Woon, M.Y. Multiple Sequential Mediation in an Extended Uses and Gratifications Model of Augmented Reality Game Pokémon Go. Internet Res. 2019, 29, 504–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, M.; Kim, J. The Effects of Perceived Online Justice on Relational Bonds and Engagement Intention: Evidence from an Online Game Community. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2018, 84, 410–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- King, D.L.; Kaptsis, D.; Delfabbro, P.H.; Gradisar, M. Craving for Internet games? Withdrawal symptoms from an 84-h abstinence from massively multiplayer online gaming. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2016, 62, 488–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hussain, Z.; Griffiths, M.D. The attitudes, feelings, and experiences of online gamers: A qualitative analysis. Cyberpsychol. Behav. 2009, 12, 747–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Whitty, M.T.; Young, G.; Goodings, L. What I won’t do in pixels: Examining the limits of taboo violation in MMORPGs. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2011, 27, 268–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Young, G.; Whitty, M.T. Games without frontiers: On the moral and psychological implications of violating taboos within multi-player virtual spaces. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2010, 26, 1228–1236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, V.H.H.; Wu, Y. Group identification as a mediator of the effect of players’ anonymity on cheating in online games. Behav. Inf. Technol. 2015, 34, 658–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, Y.; Chen, V.H.H. Understanding Online Game Cheating: Unpacking the Ethical Dimension. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 2018, 34, 786–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, J.; Lu, Y.; Gupta, S. User innovation evaluation: Empirical evidence from an online game community. Decis. Support Syst. 2019, 117, 113–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, J.H.; Wang, S.C.; Tsai, H.H. Falling in love with online games: The uses and gratifications perspective. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2010, 26, 1862–1871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kong, J.S.L.; Kwok, R.C.K.; Fang, Y. The effects of peer intrinsic and extrinsic motivation on MMOG game-based collaborative learning. Inf. Manag. 2012, 49, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Steinkuehler, C.; Williams, D. Where everybody knows your (screen) name: Online games as ‘third laces’. J. Comput. Mediat. Commun. 2006, 11, 885–909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Griffiths, M.D.; Davies, M.N.O.; Chappell, D. Demographic factors and playing variables in online computer gaming. Cyberpsychol. Behav. 2004, 7, 479–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Williams, D.; Yee, N.; Caplan, S. Who plays, how much, and why? A behavioral player census of virtual World. J. Comput. Mediat. Commun. 2008, 13, 993–1018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ducheneaut, N.; Yee, N.; Nickell, E.; Moore, R.J. The Life and Death of Online Gaming Communities: A Look at Guilds in World of Warcraft. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, San Jose, CA, USA, 28 April–3 May 2007; ACM: San Jose, CA, USA, 2007; pp. 839–848. [Google Scholar]
- Pittman, D.; Dickey, C.G. A Measurement Study of Virtual Populations in Massively Multiplayer Online Games. In Proceedings of the 6th ACM SIGCOMM Workshop on Network and System Support for Games, Melbourne, Australia, 19–20 September 2007; ACM: Melbourne, Australia, 2007; pp. 25–30. [Google Scholar]
- Smahel, D.; Blinka, L.; Ledabyl, O. Playing MMORPGs: Connections between addiction and identifying with a character. Cyberpsychol. Behav. 2008, 11, 715–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bruno, C.D.S.; Leonardo, X.D.L.E.S.; Antonio, R. MMORPGS and cognitive performance. A study with 1280 Brazilian high school students. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2010, 26, 1564–1573. [Google Scholar]
- Mehroof, M.; Griffiths, M. Online gaming addiction: The role of sensation seeking, self-Control, neuroticism, aggression, state anxiety, and trait anxiety. Cyberpsychol. Behav. 2009, 13, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, Y.; Wang, A.; Sun, Y. Technological environment, virtual experience, and MOOC continuance: A stimulus–organism–response perspective. Comput. Educ. 2020, 144, 103721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Animesh, A.; Pinsonneault, A.; Yang, S.B.; Oh, W. An Odyssey into Virtual Worlds: Exploring the Impacts of Technological and Spatial Environments on Intention to Purchase Virtual Products. MIS Q. 2011, 35, 789–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Steuer, J. Defining virtual reality: Dimensions determining telepresence. J. Commun. 1992, 42, 73–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heeter, C. Being there: The subjective experience of presence. Presence Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 1992, 1, 262–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Biocca, F.; Nowak, K. Plugging your body into the telecommunication system. In Communication Technology and Society; Lin, C., Atkin, D., Eds.; Hampton Press: Waverly Hill, VI, USA, 2001; pp. 407–447. [Google Scholar]
- Short, J.A.; Williams, E.; Christie, B. The Social Psychology of Telecommunications; John Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 1976. [Google Scholar]
- Shang, R.A.; Chen, Y.C.; Huang, S.C. A private versus a public space: Anonymity and buying decorative symbolic goods for avatars in a virtual world. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2012, 28, 2227–2235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sallnäs, E.-L. Effects of communication mode on social presence, virtual presence, and performance in collaborative virtual environments. Presence Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 2005, 14, 434–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gefen, D.; Straub, D.W. Consumer trust in B2C e-commerce and the importance of social presence: Experiments in e-products and e-services. Omega 2004, 32, 407–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shen, K.N.; Yu, A.Y.; Khalifa, M. Knowledge contribution in virtual communities: Accounting for multiple dimensions of social presence through social identity. Behav. Inf. Technol. 2010, 29, 337–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Rice, R.E. Media appropriateness: Using social presence theory to compare traditional and new organizational media. Hum. Commun. Res. 1993, 19, 458–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suh, K.S.; Chang, S. User interfaces and consumer perceptions of online stores: The role of telepresence. Behav. Inf. Technol. 2006, 25, 99–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Walker, G.R.; Sheppard, P.J. Telepresence—The future of telephony. BT Technol. J. 1997, 15, 11–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mahfouz, A.Y.; Philaretou, A.G.; Theocharous, A. Virtual social interactions: Evolutionary, social psychological and technological perspectives. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2008, 24, 3014–3026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fiore, A.M.; Kim, J.; Lee, H.H. Effect of image interactivity technology on consumer responses toward the online retailer. J. Interact. Mark. 2005, 19, 38–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gerrig, R.J. Experiencing Narrative Worlds; Yale University Press: New Haven, CT, USA, 1993. [Google Scholar]
- Kim, T.; Biocca, F. Telepresence via television: Two dimensions of telepresence may have different connections to memory and persuasion. J. Comput. Mediat. Commun. 1997, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Turner, J.C. Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory; Blackwell: Oxford, UK, 1987. [Google Scholar]
- Bagozzi, R.P.; Dholakia, U.M. Intentional social action in virtual communities. J. Interact. Mark. 2002, 16, 2–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Papadopoulos, T.; Stamati, T.; Nopparuch, P. Exploring the determinants of knowledge sharing via employee weblogs. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2013, 33, 133–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bagozzi, R.P.; Dholakia, U.M. Open source software user communities: A study of participation in Linux user groups. Manag. Sci. 2006, 52, 1099–1115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Turner, J.C. Towards a cognitive redefinition of the social group. In Social Identity and Intergroup Relations; Tajfel, H., Ed.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1982; pp. 15–40. [Google Scholar]
- Tajfel, H.; Turner, J.C. An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations; Austin, W.G., Worchel, S., Eds.; Brooks/Cole: Monterey, CA, USA, 1979; pp. 33–47. [Google Scholar]
- Ellemers, N.; Kortekaas, P.; Ouwerkerk, J. Self-categorisation, commitment to the group and group self-esteem as related but distinct aspects of social identity. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 1999, 29, 371–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hogg, M.A.; Abrams, D. Social Identifications: A Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations and Group Processes; Routledge: London, UK, 1988. [Google Scholar]
- Bergami, M.; Bagozzi, R.P. Self-categorization, affective commitment and group self-esteem as distinct aspects of social identity in the organization. Br. J. Soc. Psychol. 2000, 39, 555–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Algesheimer, R.; Dholakia, U.M.; Herrmann, A. The social influence of brand community: Evidence from German car clubs. J. Mark. 2005, 64, 19–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheung, C.M.K.; Lee, M.K.O. A Theoretical Model of Intentional Social Action in Online Social Networks. Decis. Support Syst. 2010, 49, 24–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ashforth, B.E.; Mael, F.A. Social identity theory and the organization. Acad. Manag. Rev. 1989, 14, 20–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Terry, D.J.; Hogg, M.A.; White, K.M. The theory of planned behaviour: Self-identity, social identity and group norms. Br. J. Soc. Psychol. 1999, 38, 225–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hobfoll, S.E. Social and psychological resources and adaptation. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 2002, 6, 307–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lapointe, E.; Vandenberghe, C.; Panaccio, A. Organizational commitment, emotional exhaustion and turnover: A conservation of resources perspective. Hum. Relat. 2011, 64, 1609–1631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Schmidt, K.H. Organizational commitment: A further moderator in the relationship between work stress and strain? Int. J. Stress Manag. 2007, 14, 26–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meyer, J.P.; Stanley, D.J.; Herscovitch, L.; Topolnytsky, L. Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: A meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates, and consequences. J. Vocat. Behav. 2002, 61, 20–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhattacharya, C.B.; Sen, S. Consumer-company identification: A framework for understanding consumers’ relationships with companies. J. Mark. 2003, 67, 76–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tsai, H.T.; Pai, P. Why do newcomers participate in virtual communities? An integration of self-determination and relationship management theories. Decis. Support Syst. 2014, 57, 178–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, V.; Aksoy, L.; Donkers, B.; Venkatesan, R.; Wiesel, T.; Tillmanns, S. Undervalued or overvalued customers: Capturing total customer engagement value. J. Serv. Res. 2010, 13, 297–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Cheung, C.M.K.; Shen, X.-L.; Lee, Z.W.Y.; Chan, T.K.H. Promoting sales of online games through customer engagement. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 2015, 14, 241–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ullah, A.; Aimin, W.; Ahmed, M. Smart Automation, Customer Experience and Customer Engagement in Electric Vehicles. Sustainability 2018, 10, 1350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Abbas, M.; Gao, Y.; Shah, S.S.H. CSR and Customer Outcomes: The Mediating Role of Customer Engagement. Sustainability 2018, 10, 4243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hollebeek, L.D.; Glynn, M.S.; Brodie, R.J. Consumer brand engagement in social media: Conceptualization, scale development and validation. J. Interact. Mark. 2014, 28, 149–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fang, J.; Zhao, Z.; Wen, C.; Wang, R. Design and performance attributes driving mobile travel application engagement. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2017, 37, 269–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brodie, R.J.; Ilic, A.; Juric, B.; Hollebeek, L. Consumer engagement in a virtual brand community: An exploratory analysis. J. Bus. Res. 2013, 66, 105–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Vries, N.J.; Carlson, J. Examining the drivers and brand performance implications of customer engagement with brands in the social media environment. J. Brand Manag. 2014, 21, 495–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bohmstedt, G.W. Reliability and validity assessment in attitude measurement. In Attitude Measurement; Summers, G.F., Ed.; Rand-McNally: Chicago, IL, USA, 1970; pp. 80–99. [Google Scholar]
- Jöreskog, K.G.; Sörbom, D. LISREL 8: Structural Equation Modeling with the SIMPLIS Command Language. In Scientific Software International; Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.: Mahwah, NJ, USA, 1993. [Google Scholar]
- Hair, J.F., Jr.; Black, W.C.; Babin, B.J.; Anderson, R.E. Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings, 7th ed.; Pearson: London, UK, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Henseler, J.; Ringle, C.M.; Sinkovics, R.R. The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. In New Challenges to International Marketing (Advances in International Marketing; Sinkovics, R.R., Ghauri, P.N., Eds.; Emerald Group: Bingley, UK, 2009; Volume 20, pp. 277–319. [Google Scholar]
- Fornell, C.; Larcker, D.F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Mark. Res. 1981, 18, 39–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Podsakoff, P.M.; MacKenzie, S.B.; Lee, J.Y.; Podsakoff, N.P. Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies. J. Appl. Psychol. 2003, 88, 879–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chen, C.J.; Hung, S.W. To give or to receive? Factors influencing members’ knowledge sharing and community promotion in professional virtual communities. Inf. Manag. 2010, 47, 226–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, X.; Lynch, J.G.; Chen, Q. Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and Truths about Mediation Analysis. J. Consum. Res. 2010, 37, 197–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Characteristic | Items | Frequency | Percentage | Chi-Square | DF | p-Value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gender | Male | 270 | 79.9% | 1.648 | 1 | 0.199 |
Female | 68 | 20.1% | ||||
Age | 19 or below | 19 | 5.6% | 1.128 | 3 | 0.770 |
20–29 | 208 | 61.5% | ||||
30–39 | 107 | 31.7% | ||||
40 or above | 4 | 1.2% | ||||
Educational Background | High School and under | 31 | 9.2% | 4.333 | 2 | 0.115 |
Bachelor’s degree | 248 | 73.3% | ||||
Master’s degree and over | 59 | 17.5% | ||||
Time spent on average playing this game per day | 1 hour or below | 7 | 2.1% | 1.776 | 4 | 0.777 |
1–2 h | 71 | 21% | ||||
3–4 h | 153 | 45.3% | ||||
5–6 h | 67 | 19.8% | ||||
Over 6 h | 40 | 11.8% | ||||
Time since they started to play this game | 1 year or below | 25 | 7.4% | 3.899 | 4 | 0.420 |
1–2 years | 26 | 7.7% | ||||
2–3 years | 19 | 5.6% | ||||
3–4 years | 19 | 5.6% | ||||
Over 4 years | 249 | 73.7% |
Fit Indices | Recommended Value | Measurement Model | Structural Model |
---|---|---|---|
X2/df | ≤3.00 | 2.064 | 2.639 |
GFI | ≥0.90 | 0.926 | 0.902 |
AGFI | ≥0.80 | 0.894 | 0.868 |
NNFI | ≥0.90 | 0.966 | 0.947 |
CFI | ≥0.90 | 0.973 | 0.956 |
IFI | ≥0.90 | 0.973 | 0.957 |
RFI | ≥0.90 | 0.936 | 0.918 |
RMSEA | ≤0.08 | 0.056 | 0.070 |
Construct | Items | Factor Loading | CR | AVE |
---|---|---|---|---|
SP1 | 0.799 *** | |||
Social Presence | SP2 | 0.811 *** | 0.885 | 0.720 |
SP3 | 0.930 *** | |||
TP1 | 0.781 *** | |||
Telepresence | TP2 | 0.881 *** | 0.859 | 0.670 |
TP3 | 0.790 *** | |||
CSI1 | 0.912 *** | |||
Cognitive Social Identity | CSI2 | 0.915 *** | 0.926 | 0.807 |
CSI3 | 0.867 *** | |||
ASI1 | 0.876 *** | |||
Affective Social Identity | ASI2 | 0.894 *** | 0.925 | 0.804 |
ASI3 | 0.920 *** | |||
PE1 | 0.892 *** | |||
Psychological Engagement | PE2 | 0.748 *** | 0.889 | 0.728 |
PE3 | 0.911 *** | |||
BE1 | 0.894 *** | |||
Behavioral Engagement | BE2 | 0.853 *** | 0.919 | 0.791 |
BE3 | 0.919 *** |
Construct | SP | TP | CSI | ASI | PE | BE |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SP | 0.849 | |||||
TP | 0.312 | 0.819 | ||||
CSI | 0.461 | 0.422 | 0.898 | |||
ASI | 0.635 | 0.321 | 0.416 | 0.897 | ||
PE | 0.584 | 0.349 | 0.492 | 0.505 | 0.853 | |
BE | 0.560 | 0.170 | 0.354 | 0.370 | 0.594 | 0.889 |
Effect | Direct Effect | Indirect Effect | Total Effect | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSI | ASI | PE | BE | CSI | ASI | PE | BE | CSI | ASI | PE | BE | |
SP | 0.378 | 0.651 | 0.409 | 0.261 | 0.378 | 0.651 | 0.409 | 0.261 | ||||
TP | 0.337 | 0.148 | 0.185 | 0.118 | 0.337 | 0.148 | 0.185 | 0.118 | ||||
CSI | 0.364 | 0.232 | 0.364 | 0.232 | ||||||||
ASI | 0.418 | 0.266 | 0.418 | 0.266 | ||||||||
PE | 0.637 | 0.637 |
Path | Point Estimates | Product of Coefficients | Bias-Corrected CI | Percentile CI | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SE | Z | Lower | Upper | Lower | Upper | ||
CSItoPEtoBE | 0.171 | 0.047 | 3.638 | 0.096 | 0.273 | 0.096 | 0.272 |
ASItoPEtoBE | 0.192 | 0.047 | 4.085 | 0.115 | 0.310 | 0.109 | 0.292 |
Direct Effect (CSItoBE) | 0.040 | 0.051 | 0.784 | −0.055 | 0.154 | −0.057 | 0.146 |
Direct Effect (ASItoBE) | 0.088 | 0.071 | 1.239 | −0.043 | 0.231 | −0.046 | 0.230 |
Total Indirect Effect | 0.492 | 0.073 | 6.740 | 0.340 | 0.631 | 0.344 | 0.640 |
© 2020 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Chuang, Y.-W. Promoting Consumer Engagement in Online Communities through Virtual Experience and Social Identity. Sustainability 2020, 12, 855. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12030855
Chuang Y-W. Promoting Consumer Engagement in Online Communities through Virtual Experience and Social Identity. Sustainability. 2020; 12(3):855. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12030855
Chicago/Turabian StyleChuang, Yu-Wei. 2020. "Promoting Consumer Engagement in Online Communities through Virtual Experience and Social Identity" Sustainability 12, no. 3: 855. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12030855
APA StyleChuang, Y. -W. (2020). Promoting Consumer Engagement in Online Communities through Virtual Experience and Social Identity. Sustainability, 12(3), 855. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12030855