Blockchain as a Driver for Smart City Development: Application Fields and a Comprehensive Research Agenda
Abstract
:1. Introduction
- (1)
- In which fields can blockchain technology foster the development of smart cities?
- (2)
- What research propositions arise from the application of blockchain technology in smart cities?
2. Smart Cities and Blockchain Technology
2.1. The Concept of Smart Cities
“A smart city is a geographical area with a high population density that uses information and communication technologies (ICT) to connect and monitor critical infrastructural components and services with the goal of improving the efficiency and the environmental, economic and social sustainability of its operations as well as the quality of life for its citizens”.
2.2. The Concept of Blockchain Technology
“digital, decentralized and distributed ledger in which transactions are logged and added in chronological order with the goal of creating permanent and tamperproof records”[43] (p. 547).
3. Methodology
Algorithm 1 |
1: TOPIC: (blockchain AND “smart cit*”) 2: Refined by: DOCUMENT TYPES: (ARTICLE OR REVIEW) 3: Timespan: All years. Indexes: SCI-EXPANDED, SSCI, A&HCI, ESCI. |
4. Application Fields of Blockchain in Smart Cities and Research Propositions
4.1. Smart Healthcare
- RP_Hea1:
- By enabling shared, immutable and privacy-aware databases, blockchain technology facilitates the design and deployment of smart healthcare systems with better healthcare outcomes at lower costs.
- RP_Hea1:
- The use of blockchain technology in smart-city healthcare increases patient privacy as well as the satisfaction of patients, healthcare-service and insurance providers, and administrators with the system.
4.2. Smart Logistics and Supply Chains
- RP_Log1:
- Blockchain technology can enable smart cities to reduce logistics-related congestion and pollution.
- RP_Log2:
- Blockchain technology can enable companies in smart cities to devise and implement more cost-efficient logistics and supply-chain management systems, to reduce their ecological footprint, and to raise customer satisfaction.
4.3. Smart Mobility
- RP_Mob1:
- Blockchain technology can enable public transportation systems and private mobility providers to reduce emissions, lower costs, raise revenue, and increase customer satisfaction.
- RP_Mob2:
- Blockchain technology can provide citizens of smart cities with better access to public transportation, lower commute times, and higher levels of privacy.
4.4. Smart Energy
- RP_Ene1:
- Blockchain technology can provide public energy management systems for smart cities, with better access to data, and the potential to lower costs and waste in energy production and distribution.
- RP_Ene2:
- Blockchain technology can provide private households and businesses in smart cities with secure access to energy at a lower cost, strengthen their privacy, and facilitate transactions on P2P energy markets.
- RP_Ene3:
- Blockchain technology can provide detailed information on the actual composition of the energy mix, leading to a partial replacement of fossil fuels by green energy.
4.5. Smart Administration and Services
- RP_Adm1:
- Blockchain technology allows for increased efficiency and transparency in the public administration of smart cities and holds the potential for increasing citizen trust in public administration.
- RP_Adm2:
- Blockchain technology can provide citizens of smart cities with more privacy in dealing with the government and more personalized, convenient, and inclusive access to high-quality public services.
4.6. Smart E-Voting
- RP_Vot1:
- Blockchain technology can enable e-voting in smart cities, which increases efficiency, reduces cost, and helps to ensure a fair and democratic voting process.
- RP_Vot2:
- For citizens of smart cities, blockchain technology can facilitate participation and trust in processes of democratic decision making.
4.7. Smart Factory
- RP_Fac1:
- Blockchain technology can form the basis for smart factories within smart cities by creating secure and reliable manufacturing systems.
- RP_Fac2:
- Smart factories based on blockchain technology will lead to automated workflows that increase the efficiency and effectiveness of operations.
4.8. Smart Home
- RP_Hom1:
- Blockchain technology supports the development of smart homes by creating interoperable systems that communicate and exchange data with each other.
- RP_Hom2:
- Within the concept of smart cities, citizens live in smart homes that use blockchain technology to ensure the privacy and data sovereignty of their residents.
4.9. Smart Education
- RP_Edu1:
- Blockchain technology enables smart education by providing a platform for the trustworthy and immutable recording of personal achievements.
5. Discussion, Limitations and Future Research
Author Contributions
Funding
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- United Nations. World Urbanization Prospects: The 2018 Revision; United Nations: New York, NY, USA, 2019; ISBN 978-92-1-148319-2. [Google Scholar]
- Scruggs, G. Everything we’ve heard about global urbanization turns out to be wrong. Reuters 2018, 10, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Allam, Z.; Newman, P. Redefining the smart city: Culture, metabolism and governance. Smart Cities 2018, 1, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sancino, A.; Hudson, L. Leadership in, of, and for smart cities-case studies from Europe, America, and Australia. Public Manag. Rev. 2020, 22, 701–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Jindal, A.; Kumar, N.; Singh, M. A unified framework for big data acquisition, storage, and analytics for demand response management in smart cities. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 2020, 108, 921–934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Veiga, A.A.; Abbas, C.J.B. Proposal and application of bluetooth mesh profile for smart cities’ services. Smart Cities 2019, 2, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Serrano, W. Digital systems in smart city and infrastructure: Digital as a service. Smart Cities 2018, 1, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lu, H.-P.; Chen, C.-S.; Yu, H. Technology roadmap for building a smart city: An exploring study on methodology. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 2019, 97, 727–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ferraro, P.; King, C.; Shorten, R. Distributed ledger technology for smart cities, the sharing economy, and social compliance. IEEE Access 2018, 6, 62728–62746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shen, C.; Pena-Mora, F. Blockchain for cities—A systematic literature review. IEEE Access 2018, 6, 76787–76819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hashem, I.A.T.; Chang, V.; Anuar, N.B.; Adewole, K.; Yaqoob, I.; Gani, A.; Ahmed, E.; Chiroma, H. The role of big data in smart city. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2016, 36, 748–758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hassani, H.; Huang, X.; Silva, E. Big-crypto: Big data, blockchain and cryptocurrency. Big Data Cogn. Comput. 2018, 2, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hassani, H.; Huang, X.; Silva, E.S. Fusing Big Data, Blockchain and Cryptocurrency: Their Individual and Combined Importance in the Digital Economy; Palgrave Pivot: London, UK, 2019; ISBN 978-3-030-31390-6. [Google Scholar]
- Ferdous, M.S.; Biswas, K.; Chowdhury, M.J.M.; Chowdhury, N.; Muthukkumarasamy, V. Chapter two—Integrated platforms for blockchain enablement. In Advances in Computers; Kim, S., Deka, G.C., Zhang, P., Eds.; Role of Blockchain Technology in IoT Applications; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2019; Volume 115, pp. 41–72. [Google Scholar]
- Morabito, V. Big data and analytics for government innovation. In Big Data and Analytics: Strategic and Organizational Impacts; Morabito, V., Ed.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2015; pp. 23–45. ISBN 978-3-319-10665-6. [Google Scholar]
- Caragliu, A.; Bo, C.D.; Nijkamp, P. Smart cities in Europe. J. Urban Technol. 2011, 18, 65–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Jong, M.; Joss, S.; Schraven, D.; Zhan, C.; Weijnen, M. Sustainable–smart–resilient–low carbon–eco–knowledge cities; making sense of a multitude of concepts promoting sustainable urbanization. J. Clean. Prod. 2015, 109, 25–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Herrschel, T. Competitiveness and sustainability: Can ‘smart city regionalism’ square the circle? Urban Stud. 2013, 50, 2332–2348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Allwinkle, S.; Cruickshank, P. Creating smart-er cities: An overview. J. Urban Technol. 2011, 18, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Manville, C.; Cochrane, G.; Cave, J.; Millard, J.; Pederson, J.K.; Thaarup, R.K.; Liebe, A.; Wissner, M.; Massink, R.; Kotterink, B. Mapping Smart Cities in the EU. Available online: https://www.rand.org/pubs/external_publications/EP50486.html (accessed on 25 May 2020).
- Chourabi, H.; Nam, T.; Walker, S.; Gil-Garcia, J.R.; Mellouli, S.; Nahon, K.; Pardo, T.A.; Scholl, H.J. Understanding smart cities: An integrative framework. In Proceedings of the 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Maui, HI, USA, 4–7 January 2012; pp. 2289–2297. [Google Scholar]
- Gong, S.; Tcydenova, E.; Jo, J.; Lee, Y.; Park, J.H. Blockchain-based secure device management framework for an internet of things network in a smart city. Sustainability 2019, 11, 3889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mehmood, Y.; Ahmad, F.; Yaqoob, I.; Adnane, A.; Imran, M.; Guizani, S. Internet-of-things-based smart cities: Recent advances and challenges. IEEE Commun. Mag. 2017, 55, 16–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dameri, R.P. Smart City Definition, Goals and Performance. In Smart City Implementation: Creating Economic and Public Value in Innovative Urban Systems; Dameri, R.P., Ed.; Progress in IS.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 1–22. ISBN 978-3-319-45766-6. [Google Scholar]
- Dall’O, G.; Bruni, E.; Panza, A.; Sarto, L.; Khayatian, F. Evaluation of cities’ smartness by means of indicators for small and medium cities and communities: A methodology for Northern Italy. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2017, 34, 193–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nam, T.; Pardo, T.A. The changing face of a city government: A case study of Philly311. Gov. Inf. Q. 2014, 31, S1–S9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ismagilova, E.; Hughes, L.; Dwivedi, Y.K.; Raman, K.R. Smart cities: Advances in research—An information systems perspective. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2019, 47, 88–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carli, R.; Dotoli, M.; Pellegrino, R.; Ranieri, L. Measuring and managing the smartness of cities: A framework for classifying performance indicators. In Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Manchester, UK, 13–16 October 2013; pp. 1288–1293. [Google Scholar]
- Burnes, B.; Towers, N. Consumers, clothing retailers and production planning and control in the smart city. Prod. Plan. Control 2016, 27, 490–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, F.; Nucciarelli, A.; Roden, S.; Graham, G. How smart cities transform operations models: A new research agenda for operations management in the digital economy. Prod. Plan. Control 2016, 27, 514–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mehta, P.; Gupta, R.; Tanwar, S. Blockchain envisioned UAV networks: Challenges, solutions, and comparisons. Comput. Commun. 2020, 151, 518–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kundu, D. Blockchain and trust in a smart city. Environ. Urban. ASIA 2019, 10, 31–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, M.A.; Salah, K. IoT security: Review, blockchain solutions, and open challenges. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 2018, 82, 395–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haber, S.; Stornetta, W.S. How to time-stamp a digital document. J. Cryptol. 1991, 3, 99–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nakamoto, S. Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System. 2008. Available online: https://nakamotoinstitute.org/bitcoin/ (accessed on 28 May 2020).
- Iansiti, M.; Lakhani, K.R. The truth about blockchain. Harv. Bus. Rev. 2017, 95, 118–127. [Google Scholar]
- Treiblmaier, H. Combining blockchain technology and the physical internet to achieve triple bottom line sustainability: A comprehensive research agenda for modern logistics and supply chain management. Logistics 2019, 3, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Thakkar, P.; Nathan, S.; Viswanathan, B. Performance benchmarking and optimizing hyperledger fabric blockchain platform. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE 26th International Symposium on Modeling, Analysis, and Simulation of Computer and Telecommunication Systems (MASCOTS), Milwaukee, WI, USA, 25–28 September 2018; pp. 264–276. [Google Scholar]
- Treiblmaier, H. Toward more rigorous blockchain research: Recommendations for writing blockchain case studies. Front. Blockchain 2019, 2, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Antonopoulos, A.M. Mastering Bitcoin: Unlocking Digital Cryptocurrencies; O’Reilly Media, Inc.: Sebastopol, CA, USA, 2014; ISBN 978-1-4919-0264-6. [Google Scholar]
- Cao, B.; Li, Y.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, L.; Mumtaz, S.; Zhou, Z.; Peng, M. When internet of things meets blockchain: Challenges in distributed consensus. IEEE Netw. 2019, 33, 133–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Zou, S.; Xi, J.; Wang, S.; Lu, Y.; Xu, G. Reportcoin: A novel blockchain-based incentive anonymous reporting system. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 65544–65559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Treiblmaier, H. The impact of the blockchain on the supply chain: A theory-based research framework and a call for action. Supply Chain Manag. Int. J. 2018, 23, 545–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Banerjee, M.; Lee, J.; Choo, K.-K.R. A blockchain future for internet of things security: A position paper. Digit. Commun. Netw. 2018, 4, 149–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lacity, M.C. A Manager’s Guide to Blockchains for Business: From Knowing What to Knowing How; SB Publishing: Ashford, Kent, UK, 2018; ISBN 978-0-9956820-4-7. [Google Scholar]
- Rejeb, A.; Sűle, E.; Keogh, J.G. Exploring new technologies in procurement. Transp. Logist. Int. J. 2018, 18, 76–86. [Google Scholar]
- Rejeb, A. Blockchain potential in Tilapia supply chain in Ghana. Acta Tech. Jaurinensis 2018, 11, 104–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Keogh, J.G.; Rejeb, A.; Khan, N.; Dean, K.; Hand, K.J. Blockchain and GS1 standards in the food chain: A review of the possibilities and challenges. In Building the Future of Food Safety Technology; Detwiler, D., Ed.; Elsevier: London/Oxford, UK; San Diego, CA, USA; Cambridge, MA, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Keogh, J.G.; Dube, L.; Rejeb, A.; Hand, K.J.; Khan, N.; Dean, K. The Future Food Chain: Digitization as an Enabler of Society 5.0. In Building the Future of Food Safety Technology; Detwiler, D., Ed.; Elsevier: London, UK; Oxford, UK; San Diego, CA, USA; Cambridge, MA, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Rejeb, A.; Bell, L. Potentials of blockchain for healthcare: Case of Tunisia. World Sci. News 2019, 136, 173–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rejeb, A.; Rejeb, K. Blockchain technology in tourism: Applications and possibilities. World Sci. News 2019, 137, 119–144. [Google Scholar]
- Rejeb, A.; Keogh, J.G.; Treiblmaier, H. The impact of blockchain on medical tourism. In Proceedings of the WeB 2019 Workshop on e-Business, Munich, Germany, 14 December 2019; pp. 1–12. [Google Scholar]
- Rejeb, A.; Keogh, J.G.; Treiblmaier, H. How blockchain technology can benefit marketing: Six pending research areas. Front. Blockchain 2020, 3, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Rejeb, A.; Keogh, J.G.; Treiblmaier, H. Leveraging the internet of things and blockchain technology in supply chain management. Future Internet 2019, 11, 161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Rejeb, A. Halal meat supply chain traceability based on HACCP, blockchain and internet of things. Acta Tech. Jaurinensis 2018, 11, 1–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rotună, C.; Gheorghiță, A.; Zamfiroiu, A.; Smada Anagrama, D. smart city ecosystem using blockchain technology. Inform. Econ. 2019, 23, 41–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salah, K.; Rehman, M.H.; Nizamuddin, N.; Al-Fuqaha, A. Blockchain for AI: Review and open research challenges. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 10127–10149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Q.; Zhu, X.; Ni, Y.; Gu, L.; Zhu, H. Blockchain for the IoT and industrial IoT: A review. Internet Things 2020, 10, 100081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chaer, A.; Salah, K.; Lima, C.; Ray, P.P.; Sheltami, T. Blockchain for 5G: Opportunities and challenges. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps), Waikoloa, HI, USA, 9–13 December 2019; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Fernandez-Carames, T.M.; Fraga-Lamas, P. Towards next generation teaching, learning, and context-aware applications for higher education: A review on blockchain, IoT, fog and edge computing enabled smart campuses and universities. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 4479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Zhang, Q. Quality dimensions, perspectives and practices: A mapping analysis. Int. J. Qual. Reliab. Manag. 2001, 18, 708–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grzybowska, K.; Awasthi, A. Literature review on sustainable logistics and sustainable production for Industry 4.0. In Sustainable Logistics and Production in Industry 4.0: New Opportunities and Challenges; Grzybowska, K., Awasthi, A., Sawhney, R., Eds.; EcoProduction; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 1–18. ISBN 978-3-030-33369-0. [Google Scholar]
- Ramos-Rodríguez, A.-R.; Ruíz-Navarro, J. Changes in the intellectual structure of strategic management research: A bibliometric study of the Strategic Management Journal, 1980–2000. Strateg. Manag. J. 2004, 25, 981–1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stafford, T.F.; Treiblmaier, H. Characteristics of a blockchain ecosystem for secure and sharable electronic medical records. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 2020, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ismail, L.; Materwala, H. A review of blockchain architecture and consensus protocols: Use cases, challenges, and solutions. Symmetry 2019, 11, 1198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Makhdoom, I.; Zhou, I.; Abolhasan, M.; Lipman, J.; Ni, W. PrivySharing: A blockchain-based framework for privacy-preserving and secure data sharing in smart cities. Comput. Secur. 2020, 88, 101653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, J.; Greenwood, D.; Kassem, M. Blockchain in the built environment and construction industry: A systematic review, conceptual models and practical use cases. Autom. Constr. 2019, 102, 288–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boulos, M.N.K.; Wilson, J.T.; Clauson, K.A. Geospatial blockchain: Promises, challenges, and scenarios in health and healthcare. Int. J. Health Geogr. 2018, 17, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aggarwal, S.; Chaudhary, R.; Aujla, G.S.; Kumar, N.; Choo, K.-K.R.; Zomaya, A.Y. Blockchain for smart communities: Applications, challenges and opportunities. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 2019, 144, 13–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dwivedi, A.D.; Srivastava, G.; Dhar, S.; Singh, R. A decentralized privacy-preserving healthcare blockchain for IoT. Sensors 2019, 19, 326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Liao, D.-Y.; Wang, X. Applications of blockchain technology to logistics management in integrated casinos and entertainment. Informatics 2018, 5, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Astarita, V.; Giofre, V.P.; Mirabelli, G.; Solina, V. A review of blockchain-based systems in transportation. Information 2020, 11, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mistry, I.; Tanwar, S.; Tyagi, S.; Kumar, N. Blockchain for 5G-enabled IoT for industrial automation: A systematic review, solutions, and challenges. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 2020, 135, 106382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Casado-Vara, R.; Corchado, J. Distributed e-health wide-world accounting ledger via blockchain. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 2019, 36, 2381–2386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rahman, M.A.; Rashid, M.M.; Shamim Hossain, M.; Hassanain, E.; Alhamid, M.F.; Guizani, M. Blockchain and IoT-based cognitive edge framework for sharing economy services in a smart city. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 18611–18621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, L.W.; Lee, S.; Chang, H. A sustainable home energy prosumer-chain methodology with energy tags over the blockchain. Sustainability 2018, 10, 658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Chaudhary, R.; Jindal, A.; Aujla, G.S.; Aggarwal, S.; Kumar, N.; Choo, K.-K.R. BEST: Blockchain-based secure energy trading in SDN-enabled intelligent transportation system. Comput. Secur. 2019, 85, 288–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jindal, A.; Aujla, G.S.; Kumar, N. SURVIVOR: A blockchain based edge-as-a-service framework for secure energy trading in SDN-enabled vehicle-to-grid environment. Comput. Netw. 2019, 153, 36–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bernal Bernabe, J.; Canovas, J.L.; Hernandez-Ramos, J.L.; Torres Moreno, R.; Skarmeta, A. Privacy-preserving solutions for blockchain: Review and challenges. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 164908–164940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- França, A.S.L.; Amato Neto, J.; Gonçalves, R.F.; Almeida, C.M.V.B. Proposing the use of blockchain to improve the solid waste management in small municipalities. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 244, 118529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marsal-Llacuna, M.-L. Future living framework: Is blockchain the next enabling network? Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2018, 128, 226–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sittón-Candanedo, I.; Alonso, R.S.; Corchado, J.M.; Rodríguez-González, S.; Casado-Vara, R. A review of edge computing reference architectures and a new global edge proposal. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 2019, 99, 278–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, W.; Chen, Y.; Chen, X.; Zheng, Z. Toward secure data sharing for the IoV: A quality-driven incentive mechanism with on-chain and off-chain guarantees. IEEE Internet Things J. 2020, 7, 1625–1640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aamir, M.; Qureshi, R.; Khan, F.A.; Huzaifa, M. Blockchain based academic records verification in smart cities. Wirel. Pers. Commun. 2020, 113, 1397–1406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Demirkan, H. A smart healthcare systems framework. IT Prof. 2013, 15, 38–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, Y.; Bai, G. A systematic literature review of cloud computing in eHealth. Health Inform. Int. J. 2014, 3, 11–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muhammed, T.; Mehmood, R.; Albeshri, A.; Katib, I. UbeHealth: A personalized ubiquitous cloud and edge-enabled networked healthcare system for smart cities. IEEE Access 2018, 6, 32258–32285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- AlMuhairi, M.O. Why COVID-19 Makes the Case for Wider Blockchain Integration. Available online: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/05/why-covid-19-makes-a-compelling-case-for-wider-integration-of-blockchain/ (accessed on 26 June 2020).
- Sinclair, S. Spanish Researchers Working to Curb Coronavirus Spread with Blockchain App. Available online: https://in.finance.yahoo.com/news/spanish-researchers-working-curb-coronavirus-140007260.html (accessed on 26 June 2020).
- Mashamba-Thompson, T.P.; Crayton, E.D. Blockchain and artificial intelligence technology for novel coronavirus disease 2019 self-testing. Diagnostics 2020, 10, 198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Russo, F.; Rindone, C.; Panuccio, P. European plans for the smart city: From theories and rules to logistics test case. Eur. Plan. Stud. 2016, 24, 1709–1726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Allam, Z.; Dhunny, Z.A. On big data, artificial intelligence and smart cities. Cities 2019, 89, 80–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guan, W.; Rehme, J. Vertical integration in supply chains: Driving forces and consequences for a manufacturer’s downstream integration. Supply Chain Manag. Int. J. 2012, 17, 187–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Christopher, M.; Holweg, M. “Supply Chain 2.0”: Managing supply chains in the era of turbulence. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 2011, 41, 63–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Viau, M.A.; Trepanier, M.; Baptiste, P. Integration of inventory and transportation decisions in decentralised supply chains. Int. J. Logist. Syst. Manag. 2009, 5, 249–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Benevolo, C.; Dameri, R.P.; D’Auria, B. Smart mobility in smart city. In Empowering Organizations; Torre, T., Braccini, A.M., Spinelli, R., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2016; pp. 13–28. [Google Scholar]
- Chun, B.-T.; Lee, S.-H. Review on ITS in Smart City. Adv. Sci. Technol. Lett. 2015, 98, 52–54. [Google Scholar]
- Alahakoon, D.; Yu, X. Smart electricity meter data intelligence for future energy systems: A survey. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 2016, 12, 425–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kranz, J.; Kolbe, L.M.; Koo, C.; Boudreau, M.-C. Smart energy: Where do we stand and where should we go? Electron. Mark. 2015, 25, 7–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Andoni, M.; Robu, V.; Flynn, D.; Abram, S.; Geach, D.; Jenkins, D.; McCallum, P.; Peacock, A. Blockchain technology in the energy sector: A systematic review of challenges and opportunities. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2019, 100, 143–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Riva Sanseverino, E.; Riva Sanseverino, R.; Vaccaro, V.; Macaione, I.; Anello, E. Smart cities: Case studies. In Smart Cities Atlas: Western and Eastern Intelligent Communities; Riva Sanseverino, E., Riva Sanseverino, R., Vaccaro, V., Eds.; Springer Tracts in Civil Engineering; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 47–140. ISBN 978-3-319-47361-1. [Google Scholar]
- Stillo, S. The role of salary as a motivating strategy for increasing the quality and the stability of the public administration in Albania. Int. J. Econ. Perspect. 2011, 5, 5–15. [Google Scholar]
- Secară, C.G. Analysis of selection and recruitment in the public administration. Agric. Manag. Stiintifice Ser. Manag. Agric. 2010, 12, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
- Mostafa, M.M.; El-Masry, A.A. Citizens as consumers: Profiling e-government services’ users in Egypt via data mining techniques. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2013, 33, 627–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anane, R.; Freeland, R.; Theodoropoulos, G. E-Voting requirements and implementation. In Proceedings of the 9th IEEE International Conference on E-Commerce Technology and the 4th IEEE International Conference on Enterprise Computing, E-Commerce and E-Services (CEC-EEE 2007), Tokyo, Japan, 23–26 July 2007; pp. 382–392. [Google Scholar]
- Zhen, M.; Masood, T.; Rahimifard, A.; Weston, R. A structured modelling approach to simulating dynamic behaviours in complex organisations. Prod. Plan. Control 2009, 20, 496–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Götz, M.; Jankowska, B. On the role of clusters in fostering the Industry 4.0. In International Business in the Information and Digital Age; van Tulder, R., Verbeke, A., Piscitello, L., Eds.; Progress in International Business Research; Emerald Publishing Limited: Bingley, Yorkshire, UK, 2018; Volume 13, pp. 379–390. ISBN 978-1-78756-326-1. [Google Scholar]
- Rashid, A.; Tjahjono, B. Achieving manufacturing excellence through the integration of enterprise systems and simulation. Prod. Plan. Control 2016, 27, 837–852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Stoyanova, M.; Nikoloudakis, Y.; Panagiotakis, S.; Pallis, E.; Markakis, E.K. A survey on the internet of things (IoT) forensics: Challenges, approaches and open issues. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 2020, 22, 1191–1221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wildemann, H.; Hojak, F. Main Differences and Commonalities Between the Aircraft and the Automotive Industry. In Supply Chain Integration Challenges in Commercial Aerospace: A Comprehensive Perspective on the Aviation Value Chain; Richter, K., Walther, J., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 119–138. ISBN 978-3-319-46155-7. [Google Scholar]
- Sripan, M.; Lin, X.; Petchlorlean, P.; Ketcham, M. Research and thinking of smart home technology. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Systems and Electronic Engineering (ICSEE’2012), Phuket, Thailand, 18–19 December 2012; pp. 61–63. [Google Scholar]
- Apthorpe, N.; Reisman, D.; Feamster, N. A smart home is no castle: Privacy vulnerabilities of encrypted IoT traffic. arXiv 2017, arXiv:1705.06805. [Google Scholar]
- Edwards, W.K.; Grinter, R.E. At home with ubiquitous computing: Seven challenges. In Ubicomp 2001: Ubiquitous Computing; Abowd, G.D., Brumitt, B., Shafer, S., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2001; pp. 256–272. [Google Scholar]
- Ortiz-Fournier, L.V.; Márquez, E.; Flores, F.R.; Rivera-Vázquez, J.C.; Colon, P.A. Integrating educational institutions to produce intellectual capital for sustainability in Caguas, Puerto Rico. Knowl. Manag. Res. Pract. 2017, 8, 203–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, H.; Han, D. EduRSS: A blockchain-based educational records secure storage and sharing scheme. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 179273–179289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Druckman, J.N.; Green, D.P.; Kuklinski, J.H.; Lupia, A. Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2011; ISBN 978-0-521-19212-5. [Google Scholar]
- Vu, P.; Adkins, M.; Henderson, S. Aware, but don’t really care: Students’ perspective on privacy and data collection in online courses. J. Open Flex. Distance Learn. 2020, 23, 42–51. [Google Scholar]
- Zhou, Z.; Hu, C. Research on the risk identification of academic information system based on the comprehensive weighting method. Inf. Sci. 2017, 8, 29. [Google Scholar]
- Filvà, D.A.; García-Peñalvo, F.J.; Forment, M.A.; Escudero, D.F.; Casañ, M.J. Privacy and identity management in Learning Analytics processes with Blockchain. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality, Salamanca, Spain, 24–26 October 2018; Association for Computing Machinery: Salamanca, Spain, 2018; pp. 997–1003. [Google Scholar]
- Fadeyi, O.; Krejcar, O.; Maresova, P.; Kuca, K.; Brida, P.; Selamat, A. Opinions on sustainability of smart cities in the context of energy challenges posed by cryptocurrency mining. Sustainability 2020, 12, 169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Example of Articles | ||
---|---|---|
Specific focus | Smart Healthcare | [32,64,65,66,67,68,69,70] |
Smart Logistics and Supply Chains | [14,65,69,71,72,73,74] | |
Smart Mobility | [14,67,72,75] | |
Smart Energy | [66,69,76,77,78] | |
Smart Administration and Services | [32,67,79,80,81] | |
Smart E-Voting | [65,67,69] | |
Smart Factory | [33,67,68,73,82,83] | |
Smart Home | [14,66,67,75,76] | |
Smart Education | [60,84] |
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Treiblmaier, H.; Rejeb, A.; Strebinger, A. Blockchain as a Driver for Smart City Development: Application Fields and a Comprehensive Research Agenda. Smart Cities 2020, 3, 853-872. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities3030044
Treiblmaier H, Rejeb A, Strebinger A. Blockchain as a Driver for Smart City Development: Application Fields and a Comprehensive Research Agenda. Smart Cities. 2020; 3(3):853-872. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities3030044
Chicago/Turabian StyleTreiblmaier, Horst, Abderahman Rejeb, and Andreas Strebinger. 2020. "Blockchain as a Driver for Smart City Development: Application Fields and a Comprehensive Research Agenda" Smart Cities 3, no. 3: 853-872. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities3030044