Next Article in Journal
Future of Chondroprotectors in the Treatment of Degenerative Processes of Connective Tissue
Next Article in Special Issue
Topical Administration of Cannabidiol: Influence of Vehicle-Related Aspects on Skin Permeation Process
Previous Article in Journal
Metformin Derivative HL156A Reverses Multidrug Resistance by Inhibiting HOXC6/ERK1/2 Signaling in Multidrug-Resistant Human Cancer Cells
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Pharmaceuticals
Volume 13
Issue 9
10.3390/ph13090219
pharmaceuticals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Towards Better Delivery of Cannabidiol (CBD)

by
Sophie Anne Millar
1,
Ryan Francis Maguire
2,
Andrew Stephen Yates
1 and
Saoirse Elizabeth O’Sullivan
1,*
1
Artelo Biosciences, 888 Prospect Street, Suite 210, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA
2
Division of Graduate Entry Medicine and Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Royal Derby Hospital, Derby DE22 3DT, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pharmaceuticals 2020, 13(9), 219; https://doi.org/10.3390/ph13090219
Submission received: 7 August 2020 / Revised: 26 August 2020 / Accepted: 27 August 2020 / Published: 28 August 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cannabidiol: Advances in Therapeutic Applications and Future Perspectives)
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Cannabidiol (CBD) has substantial therapeutic potential, but its development as an effective drug by the pharmaceutical industry is hindered by intrinsic characteristics such as low bioavailability, low water solubility, and variable pharmacokinetic profiles. Importantly, lack of patentability of the drug substance also limits the likelihood of an expensive, full development programme in anything other than orphan indications. Potential avenues to overcome these issues with CBD include self-emulsifying drug delivery systems, improved crystal formulations and other solid-state delivery formulations, which are mostly in the pre-clinical or early clinical stages of development. This review identifies issues compromising current delivery of solid-state CBD, and how advanced pharmaceutical development strategies can enable CBD to realise the full potential as a successful therapeutic agent.

1. Introduction

Cannabidiol (CBD) is a phytocannabinoid used globally for a variety of indications, but with few approved medicinal applications. Purified CBD is only licensed in treatment-resistant, rare paediatric forms of epilepsy [1,2,3,4,5]. Ongoing clinical trials are being conducted in potential indications such as anxiety, schizophrenia, addiction, post-traumatic stress disorder, graft-versus-host disease, cancer and inflammatory bowel disease. The United States (US) Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicine Agency approved drug formulations containing CBD include Epidiolex® (a pure CBD oral solution) and Sativex® (a CBD and Delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC, 1:1) oromucosal spray), both developed by GW pharmaceuticals.
In order to be successfully utilised as a medicine, it is paramount to identify and overcome the inherent challenges that face CBD’s effective delivery, particularly through the oral route, which is the most preferred route for drug delivery by patients and drug developers. Some of the most significant issues with oral CBD include poor bioavailability, variable pharmacokinetics profiles, and possible polymorphisms [6], which may have unintended consequences of less predictable efficacy, increased side effects and drug–drug interactions with higher doses. This review will outline some of the current issues with CBD pharmaceutics, the novel CBD formulations under development and under clinical investigation, and the strategies to improve CBD delivery and efficacy.

2. The Problems with CBD

2.1. Bioavailability and Pharmacokinetics

Successful drug delivery to the intended target sites of action is dependent on multiple factors including the individual’s physiology and the drug’s physicochemical properties (solubility, dissolution, stability, permeability and metabolism). Poor bioavailability, which is dependent on these factors, generally leads to insufficient therapeutic efficacy and is more likely to produce high inter-individual variability in pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters [7,8]. In this context, the bioavailability of CBD varies greatly with route and mode of administration [9,10]. The oil/water partition coefficient (Log P) describes a drug preference which exists either in the water or oil part of a solution; higher Log P values mean more of the drug will be distributed in the oil part of the solution. Due to the highly lipophilic nature of CBD (Log P 6.3) [11], it is most commonly supplied as an oil or alcoholic formulation either in soft-gel capsules, liquid solution, sublingual drops, or as an oromucosal spray [12]. Studies examining oral and oromucosal delivery of CBD and THC at equimolar concentrations in humans show high inter/intra-individual variability [13,14].
Highly lipophilic drugs delivered orally in solution can precipitate in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, resulting in an absorption rate slower than elimination [8]. The oral bioavailability of CBD is estimated at 6%, although data in this area have been noted to be considerably lacking [15]. Time to peak plasma concentration following oral delivery is slow (1–4 h), the Cmax (maximum concentration) generated from 20 mg of orally delivered CBD/THC sprayed onto a gelatin capsule was 2.4 ng/mL of CBD, and the half-life of CBD was reported between 1.4 and 10.9 h after oromucosal spray [14,15]. Oil suspensions designed for oral and oromucosal routes of administration are currently favoured; Epidiolex® is delivered orally in an oil solution, and Sativex as an oromucosal spray. The oromucosal route circumvents some of the problems associated with the oral route, and provides a more rapid onset of action. However, Itin and colleagues suggest that a substantial proportion of the oromucosal delivered dose may actually be absorbed through the GI tract [16]. Authors noted that the PK of Sativex is different when administered in a fasting state relative to a fed state (as is Epidiolex), but that this should not be the case as PK profiles should only be substantially influenced by a fed-state when consumed orally. Furthermore, in work published by Guy and colleagues, the PK parameters of Sativex were similar between oromucosal and oral routes of administration [14]. These observations are in agreement with further work by Itin and colleagues, demonstrating CBD’s lipophilic nature causes it to accumulate in the oral mucosal lining or enter the GI tract upon swallowing [17]. However, the authors suggest this route of administration remains viable, so long as exposure times to the oral mucosal lining are adequate, and a method of preventing washout of the drug by saliva is present.
A potential method to increase oral bioavailability is to administer CBD alongside a high-fat/high-calorie meal [16]. This has been demonstrated in healthy subjects with about four-fold increases in bioavailability compared to fasted, and in adult patients with refractory epilepsy with four- and fourteen-fold increases in area under the curve (AUC) and Cmax, respectively, in the fed state compared to fasted [18,19,20]. This is likely due to increased micelle and chylomicron formation making more drugs available for lymphatic transport [21,22]. High fat meals also potentially inhibit the activity of drug efflux transporters present on the apical membrane of enterocytes, and stimulate the release of biliary secretion, which further inhibits efflux transporter activity [23,24]. Although lymphatic transport bypasses the liver into systemic circulation, CBD delivered orally is still subject to first pass metabolism. One study showed the AUC of 7-hydroxy-cannabidiol (7-OH-CBD) is about 40% the level of orally delivered CBD, however participants were also receiving concomitant treatment Clobazam, Valproate or Stripentol [25]. Indeed, impaired hepatic metabolism has been shown to cause an increase in the bioavailability of CBD, and indicates first pass metabolism represents a significant barrier in increasing the bioavailability of CBD [26].
Smoking or vaporisation can overcome some of the problems of CBD delivery. The bioavailability of five individuals after smoking 20 mg of deuterium-labelled CBD was reported at 31 ± 13% (range 11–45%) [27]. Smoking allows for rapid delivery of CBD, and peak plasma levels occurred within 3 min following inhalation (110 ± 55 ng/mL). A more recent study assessing the pharmacokinetics of vaporised CBD (100 mg) in healthy men (n = 6) and women (n = 6) showed a mean Cmax of 125.4 ng/mL ± 95.2 in men and 83.7 ng/mL ± 8.8 in women [28]. This study also compared vaporised CBD to orally delivered CBD at the same dose, and found vaporisation produced around a ten-fold increase in Cmax. Whilst vaporisation increases the bioavailability of CBD, large standard deviations indicate there is still substantial variability in inter-subject pharmacokinetics. Furthermore, the use of solubilisers required to create a vaporisable solution can result in irritation of the airways and may not be suitable for all patients. Smoking a cannabis-based medicinal product is also not currently allowed under legislation in the UK.
A number of alternative delivery methods by-passing the digestive tract and first pass metabolism are currently under investigation including transdermal and nasal routes, and eye drops, which have been reviewed elsewhere [29].

2.2. Stability

CBD can be degraded depending on temperature, light and auto-oxidation. Mazzetti and colleagues examined nine commercially available CBD E-liquids and found an average degradation by 13% in 30 days when exposed to light and room temperature. However, samples stored in the dark at room temperature only suffered 4% degradation, suggesting light is a significant contributing factor in degradation at room temperature [30]. Another recent analysis found that CBD samples stored in the dark at room temperature for three months showed the presence of Δ9-THC and Δ8-THC impurities [31]. Whether the stability of CBD products is altered by different formulations is not known [32]. However, one study demonstrated that CBD dissolved in medium-chain triglycerides (MCT) oil is completely devoid of any lipid oxidation products, indicating MCT oil matrices are less susceptible to oxidative degradation than olive oil or hemp seed oil. Oxidative processes are associated with rancidity and deterioration of fats, as well as decreased concentrations of cannabinoids and terpenes [33]. Epidiolex® (suspended in sesame seed oil and ethanol) and Sativex (suspended in ethanol anhydrous, propylene glycol and peppermint oil) are said to be stable 56 and 48 days after opening the container, respectively (see prescribing information (https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2018/210365lbl.pdf) and online website (http://sativex.co.uk/ms-nurses/frequently-asked-questions/)).

2.3. Dosing and Side Effects

In our systematic review, within randomised controlled trials administering CBD (by oral solution, capsules, or oromucosal spray), an average dose of 14 mg/Kg/day was reported in positive outcome trials, compared to 5 mg/Kg/day average dose reported in trials in which CBD did not demonstrate efficacy [34]. The high oral doses that are required for efficacy may impact the occurrence of adverse events (AEs), as well as increasing drug costs to the healthcare provider or patient.
CBD is generally described as well tolerated, with a favourable safety profile, and does not demonstrate any evidence of abuse potential [35,36]. CBD has been most extensively studied in the clinical setting of patients with epilepsy. Within these trials, the most common side effects observed have been somnolence/sedation, diarrhoea, loss of appetite, fatigue, and sleep disturbances [37]. Concomitant increases in anti-epileptic drug metabolites because of drug–drug interactions (DDIs) with CBD may contribute to particular side effects observed such as somnolence [2,38]. A recent review which analysed prescribing information and new drug applications from federal agency websites (U.S. FDA, Health Canada, and others) reported that nearly one half of CBD users experienced an AE, which generally followed a dose-dependent relationship [39]. In one randomised controlled trial in treatment resistant epilepsy, AEs were reported in 93% of patients taking CBD and included vomiting and diarrhoea, while 86% of patients in another trial reported similar AEs [4,40]. A recent systematic review and meta-analysis on the clinical benefits of CBD found mild side effects to be present in 76% of patients taking purified CBD (such as Epidiolex®) and 33% in those taking CBD-rich extracts, and this was statistically different from placebo [41]. It was also noted that those receiving pure CBD reported administering higher doses compared to those taking CBD-rich extracts (25 mg/Kg/day vs. 6 mg/Kg/day), without differences in efficacy. It is unclear whether CBD-rich extracts demonstrate a more favourable side effect profile due to the presence of non-standardised herbal compositions, improved absorption of the CBD in the more complex mixture of compounds or whether it is due to the lower doses of individual cannabinoids reportedly consumed. It is also noteworthy that all CBD-rich extract studies were retrospective records or online surveys, while pure CBD trials were prospective, randomised controlled trials [41]. Thus, it is not clear whether various CBD formulations have different side effect profiles.

2.4. Drug–Drug Interactions

Drug–drug interactions (DDIs) with CBD are a high risk as it is metabolised by, and a competitive inhibitor of, CYP450 enzymes (specifically CYP3A4 and CYP2C19) [39,42]. A case report of a 32-year-old woman with refractory epilepsy receiving tacrolimus (5 mg/day) and CBD (2000–2900 mg/day) reported that after two weeks of co-administration there was a threefold increase in dose-normalised tacrolimus concentrations [43]. A case report of a 37-year-old male similarly suggested CBD can increase warfarin concentrations [44]. More robust evidence of DDIs comes from a meta-analysis assessing four randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials in Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS) and Dravet syndrome (DS) (n = 396 LGS, 318 DS) [45]. Authors noted incidences of serious AEs were 8% higher in CBD groups relative to placebo, and in patients taking clobazam alongside CBD, AEs were 14% more common than CBD alone. Blood plasma levels of the pharmacological active metabolite of clobazam, N-desmethylclobazam, were three times higher when administered alongside CBD. Likewise, increases in the CBD metabolite, 7-OH-CBD, are also seen when these drugs are co-administered [46]. Valprorate, another common anti-epileptic drug, is strongly associated with increased liver transaminases levels with CBD use. An FDA report describing clinical data for Epidiolex® in the treatment of LGS or Dravet syndrome highlighted alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels were three times the normal limit in 13% of Epidiolex® treated patients. This AE was also true for patients taking clobazam, but was more common in valproate treated patients. Another study investigating the potential for DDIs with cannabis-based medications using the FDA drug interaction database identified three of the main cytochrome enzymes (CYP3A4, CYP2C9 and CYP2C19) responsible for 20–70% of total cytochrome p450 activity were inhibited by CBD [47]. Furthermore, following oxidative reactions at phase 1 metabolism, CBD is then subject to phase II glucuronidation reactions by the enzymes UGT1A9 UGT2B7 and UGT1A7. Competitive binding for these enzymes between drugs also presents another point at which drug metabolite levels could be altered [47]. These observations indicate the potential for DDIs with CBD in a variety of conditions are likely, and needs to be investigated using large patient studies.

2.5. Polymorphisms

In material science, a polymorphism refers to the occurrence of differing crystalline structures of the same chemical compound which can be due to the crystallisation conditions (such as the rate of crystallisation) leading to different molecular conformations [48]. Polymorphic substances have identical chemical composition, thus will demonstrate the same chemical behaviour once in solution. Polymorphism screening is a vital component of pharmaceutical drug development as the existence of polymorphisms can affect drug performance and characteristics; for example, a fourfold difference in solubility can occur between different forms due to differences in dissolution rates [49]. An active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) based on a single polymorphism is likely to have an improved and consistent safety and efficacy profile. These properties may include thermodynamic, kinetic, surface, and mechanical properties, amongst others [48]. Polymorphism is acknowledged as an issue in drug development by key regulatory agencies who have issued guidance on approaches used to control for and to justify using polymorphic forms in drug substances. As stated by the FDA’s guidance document “polymorphism can affect the quality, safety, and efficacy of the drug product”; so controlling polymorphism from the drug substance can provide an easier development with regards to regulatory approval [50]. CBD has been shown to be present as two or more inherent crystalline forms which have potential effects on drug absorption and bioavailability due to different physicochemical properties [6]. To date, no studies have assessed how different crystalline forms may impact the pharmacokinetic profile of CBD, which may have implications for CBD being developed as solid-state forms.

3. Novel CBD Medical Products in Development

Due to the challenges with CBD, many companies are trying to develop CBD medicines with better PK profiles. These strategies include self-emulsifying drug delivery systems, improved single crystal structures, and CBD cocrystals. Table 1 summarises some of the different CBD formulations under development by commercial companies with information in the public domain.

3.1. Self-Emulsifying Drug Delivery Systems

Methods to increase oral CBD bioavailability have included self-emulsifying drug delivery systems (SEDDS). These involve mixtures of oils, surfactants, and solvents that produce nano or micro sized droplets when they come into contact with an aqueous solution such as in the gut [51]. The small nature of the droplets increases the surface area available for drugs to be dissolved and absorbed. For example, soft gelatin capsules containing CBD developed by Satipharm, based on an advanced self-nanoemulsifying technology, have demonstrated greater bioavailability (about 31–34% higher compared to a reference oromucosal spray), solubility, and faster time to peak plasma concentrations in humans [52,53,54]. However, inter-individual variations were still high. This formulation has been proven safe and effective in a paediatric population with treatment-resistant epilepsy [1]. Another group recently reported a 4.4-fold increase in Cmax, enhanced bioavailability, and shorter Tmax with a SEDDS-CBD formulation based on VESIsorb® technology compared to a control CBD oil [51]. VESIsorb® is a novel lipid-based delivery system which self-assembles on contact with an aqueous phase into a colloidal delivery system, which solubilises the drug and improves diffusion and absorption and thus bioavailability [55]. In rats, another approach of a nano-emulsion (NE) formulation has been tested. CBD-NE oil drops increased absorption and bioavailability (21% higher) compared to a control CBD oil [56]. However, there may be practical (stability, complex formulations, safety of excipients, scalability) and economic (cost of formulation, patentability) issues with this method of increasing oral CBD bioavailability.
Although the methodology is not clear from publicly available information, Echo Pharmaceuticals and Ananda Scientific are also investigating formulations which claim to enhance bioavailability and consistency in PK profiles by increasing CBD’s water solubility; Ananda’s Liquid Structure™ Enhanced CBD and Echo Pharmaceutical’s Arvisol, using their lipophilic compound delivery technology Alitra®. Both compounds are in preclinical or early clinical phase 1 development (see Table 1).
Another encapsulated form of CBD is APH-1501 (produced by Aphios), which are time-released capsules in which CBD is encapsulated in biodegradable polymer nanospheres as a lyophilised powder. This CBD is awaiting phase 2 testing in opioid addiction.

3.2. Solid-State Delivery Formulations

Solid-state oral delivery allows for 100% of the drug to reach the GI tract and has the potential to improve PK characterisation [76,77]. CBD delivered via this route would also further avoid local side effects associated with use of Sativex oromucosal spray (1:1 CBD:THC) or GI discomfort or pain associated with the vehicle itself in oral liquid formulations [78]. Current investigated solid-dose oral formulations of CBD include a 200 mg CBD tablet by Columbia Care called BeneCeed™, which will be used in a UK clinical trial. Elsewhere, a patent by GW pharmaceuticals lists a solid-state CBD as a potential clinical consideration in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease [79]. Whilst dosing in this fashion ensures a consistent dose, formulations of this nature do not necessarily address problems associated with poor bioavailability.

3.3. Improved Single Crystal Structures

Some researchers claim to have improved the single crystal form of CBD. For example, one patent listed describes a crystalline CBD of a novel form, including (R,R)-(−)-crystalline cannabidiol [80]. This crystalline form was shown to possess a melting point of 37–50 °C, compared with a melting point of 66–67 °C for CBD. Intramolecular crystal lattice binding between ions within a crystal affects its melting point and reductions in lattice energies may increase aqueous solubility [8]. PureForm CBD™ is described as a molecularly identical, non-hemp-based CBD that has been developed using their Inter-Molecular Stacking Technology to improve solubility and stability [81]. There is no further publicly available information on these products.

3.4. Cocrystal Engineering as a Potential Solution for CBD Oral Delivery

Interest and progress in the concept of cocrystallisation have expanded over recent years and is becoming a well-established process in drug development. Cocrystals consist of the API and one or more unique crystalline co-formers which modify the material properties whilst retaining the intrinsic pharmacological drug activity. Cocrystallisation is a useful method for overcoming problematic properties of drugs by increasing the bioavailability, solubility, dissolution rate, physical form, melting point, tableting, stability, or permeability of drug substances [82,83,84]. Further advantages of crystal preparations include the potential for numerous co-molecules including preservatives, other APIs, and pharmaceutical excipients, as well as providing the opportunity to address intellectual property issues by extending API life cycles and fulfilling patent eligibility criteria [85].
Entresto™ is an example of a drug–drug cocrystal containing monosodium sacubitril and disodium valsartan used to treat chronic heart failure that has obtained FDA approval. PK studies demonstrated a mean relative bioavailability of 161% in the cocrystal form of valsartan compared to reference valsartan tablets [86]. The cocrystal demonstrates high solubility and medium permeability. Suglat® is another marketed cocrystal, comprised of the sodium glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor ipragliflozin and L-proline, approved in Japan for the treatment of diabetes mellitus. The third cocrystal currently on the market is Depakote®, an anti-convulsant drug, which is comprised of valproate sodium with valproic acid [87].
Artelo Biosciences have developed a cocrystal with CBD that was designed to take advantage of cocrystal properties and help alleviate some of the problems with CBD delivery. This cocrystal uses the co-former tetramethylpyrazine (TMP; also called ligustrazine), a plant-derived compound from the Ligusticum species that is widely used in Chinese medicine. TMP may offer increased efficacy and bioavailability, by acting synergistically and changing the physiochemical properties that are associated with ineffective absorption. ART12.11 (CBD:TMP cocrystal) is currently in the nonclinical phase of pharmaceutical development targeted towards post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), stroke and rare diseases, and has been recently granted a composition of matter patent in the US.

3.5. Other Delivery Systems and Formulation in Development

An oral capsule developed by Lexaria Bioscience Corp called “TurboCBD” claims to result in increased circulating CBD levels compared to control CBD, and contains American ginseng, ginkgo biloba, and organic hemp oil, produced using DehydraTECH™ delivery technology [69].
Preveceutical’s “Sol-Gel” is exploring an intranasal CBD formulation to increase bioavailability and is currently in the pre-clinical stage (see Table 1). Zynerba Pharmaceuticals have progressed a permeation-enhanced CBD gel “Zygel” for transdermal application to phase 2 trials [75]. Botanix pharmaceuticals are exploring a number of gel formulations for transdermal application in indications such as acne, psoriasis and dermatitis that are in early clinical development.
Kalytera are also exploring inflammatory skin conditions using an L-valine-ester derivative of CBD for topical delivery, which is in pre-clinical stages. Kalytera are also developing a bi-sulphate derivative of CBD for oral delivery which claims to be water soluble, a bi-phosphate CBD derivative aimed for intra-tracheal delivery via a novel aerosolised formulation, and an intravenous (IV) formulation (see Table 1). GW Pharmaceuticals list an IV formulation in phase 1 trial for neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (NHIE).
A sublingual formulation by Diverse Biotech Inc., and an oral liquid by Emerald Health Pharmaceuticals containing a pure synthetic CBD are both in early clinical phases (see Table 1).
Complexation of CBD with cyclodextrins (CD) has also been investigated as a potential method to increase the water solubility and subsequently improve the bioavailability of sublingually delivered CBD. Mannila and colleagues demonstrated precipitation complexation of CBD and β-CD at a 1:2 ratio could increase the water solubility of CBD and increase the dissolution rate [88]. The authors noted sublingual delivery of the CBD/β-CD complex produced superior bioavailability compared to oral dosage forms of CBD in rabbits. However, in this study, CBD delivered in an ethanol solution sublingually was comparable to sublingual delivery of the CBD/β-CD complex. Two formulations of CBD and CDs are currently in development by Medexus pharmaceuticals and Vireo health LLC. These companies propose complexes of CBD and CDs will increase the aqueous solubility and subsequently improve bioavailability. However no clinical studies have been performed using these exact formulations to date.

4. Conclusions

Intrinsic problematic issues, such as polymorphism, low aqueous solubility and poor bioavailability, hinder the effective clinical development of CBD as an oral drug in the solid-state. SEDDS offer a way to increase bioavailability by increasing the solubilisation of CBD in the aqueous environment of the GI tract, allowing more CBD to cross the unstirred water layer of the GI tract and move into lymphatic or blood circulation [51]. However, SEDDS can cause chemical instabilities of drugs and high surfactant concentrations have the potential to irritate the GI tract. Furthermore, some of hydrophilic components can diffuse into the shells of gelatine capsules causing precipitation and poor dissolution rates of the drug in the GI tract [89]. While SEDDS formulations may have merit, these approaches suffer from using a lipophilic molecule which is not optimised for absorption within the gut, and intellectual property protecting these innovations can often be circumnavigated by experienced scientists. A cocrystal modification has the potential to overcome numerous physiochemical issues, allowing improved stability and bioavailability. Cocrystals can be “fine-tuned” using various inert or pharmacologically active co-formers, which may provide a more predictable pharmacokinetic profile and subsequently reduce side effects associated with high intra- and inter-personal variability. Importantly, because co-crystal formulations offer a unique and defined composition of matter, patentability ensures financial investment is available to push CBD from bench to bedside. What is clear is that the field of cannabinoid-based medicines, with CBD as a leading example, has a rich and diverse future ahead with continued preclinical research and a strong clinical pipeline. If companies are able to overcome the challenges facing the druggability of CBD, or indeed other cannabinoids or phytochemicals, in the oral solid dosage form, and protect their investment through strong intellectual property, it will undoubtedly lead to the best chance of wide therapeutic applications, offering solutions to many more patients.

Author Contributions

Conceptualisation, S.E.O. and A.S.Y.; investigation, S.A.M. and R.F.M.; writing—original draft preparation, S.A.M.; writing—review and editing, S.E.O., A.S.Y., S.A.M. and R.F.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

S.E.O., S.A.M. and A.S.Y. are independent consultants and work as paid scientific advisors to Artelo Biosciences.

References

  1. Mitelpunkt, A.; Kramer, U.; Hausman Kedem, M.; Zilbershot Fink, E.; Orbach, R.; Chernuha, V.; Fattal-Valevski, A.; Deutsch, L.; Heffetz, D.; Sacks, H. The safety, tolerability, and effectiveness of PTL-101, an oral cannabidiol formulation, in pediatric intractable epilepsy: A phase II, open-label, single-center study. Epilepsy Behav. 2019, 98, 233–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Devinsky, O.; Patel, A.D.; Cross, J.H.; Villanueva, V.; Wirrell, E.C.; Privitera, M.; Greenwood, S.M.; Roberts, C.; Checketts, D.; VanLandingham, K.E.; et al. Effect of Cannabidiol on Drop Seizures in the Lennox–Gastaut Syndrome. N. Engl. J. Med. 2018, 378, 1888–1897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Devinsky, O.; Marsh, E.; Friedman, D.; Thiele, E.; Laux, L.; Sullivan, J.; Miller, I.; Flamini, R.; Wilfong, A.; Filloux, F.; et al. Cannabidiol in patients with treatment-resistant epilepsy: An open-label interventional trial. Lancet Neurol. 2016, 15, 270–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Thiele, E.A.; Marsh, E.D.; French, J.A.; Mazurkiewicz-Beldzinska, M.; Benbadis, S.R.; Joshi, C.; Lyons, P.D.; Taylor, A.; Roberts, C.; Sommerville, K.; et al. Cannabidiol in patients with seizures associated with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (GWPCARE4): A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet 2018, 391, 1085–1096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Hess, E.J.; Moody, K.A.; Geffrey, A.L.; Pollack, S.F.; Skirvin, L.A.; Bruno, P.L.; Paolini, J.L.; Thiele, E.A. Cannabidiol as a new treatment for drug-resistant epilepsy in tuberous sclerosis complex. Epilepsia 2016, 57, 1617–1624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Mayr, T.; Grassl, T.; Korber, N.; Christoffel, V.; Bodensteiner, M. Cannabidiol revisited. IUCrData 2017, 2, x170276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Hellriegel, E.T.; Bjornsson, T.D.; Hauck, W.W. Interpatient variability in bioavailability is related to the extent of absorption: Implications for bioavailability and bioequivalence studies. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 1996, 60, 601–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chan, O.H.; Stewart, B.H. Physicochemical and drug-delivery considerations for oral drug bioavailability. Drug Discov. Today 1996, 1, 461–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Huestis, M.A. Human cannabinoid pharmacokinetics. Chem. Biodivers 2007, 4, 1770–1804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Martin, J.H.; Schneider, J.; Lucas, C.J.; Galettis, P. Exogenous Cannabinoid Efficacy: Merely a Pharmacokinetic Interaction? Clin. Pharmacokinet. 2018, 57, 539–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Odi, R.; Bibi, D.; Wager, T.; Bialer, M. A perspective on the physicochemical and biopharmaceutic properties of marketed antiseizure drugs—From phenobarbital to cenobamate and beyond. Epilepsia 2020, 61, 1543–1552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Thomas, B.F.; Compton, D.R.; Martin, B.R. Characterization of the lipophilicity of natural and synthetic analogs of delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol and its relationship to pharmacological potency. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1990, 255. [Google Scholar]
  13. Guy, G.W.; Robson, P.J. A phase I, double blind, three-way crossover study to assess the pharmacokinetic profile of Cannabis Based Medicine Extract (CBME) administered sublingually in variant cannabinoid ratios in normal healthy male volunteers (GWPK0215). J. Cannabis Ther. 2003, 3, 121–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Guy, G.W.; Robson, P.J. A phase I, open label, four-way crossover study to compare the pharmacokinetic profiles of a single dose of 20 mg of a Cannabis Based Medicine Extract (CBME) administered on 3 different areas of the Buccal Mucosa and to investigate the pharmacokinetics of CBME per oral in healthy male and female volunteers (GWPK0112). J. Cannabis Ther. 2003, 3, 79–120. [Google Scholar]
  15. Millar, S.A.; Stone, N.L.; Yates, A.S.; O’Sullivan, S.E. A Systematic Review on the Pharmacokinetics of Cannabidiol in Humans. Front. Pharmacol. 2018, 9, 1365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Itin, C.; Domb, A.J.; Hoffman, A. A meta-opinion: Cannabinoids delivered to oral mucosa by a spray for systemic absorption are rather ingested into gastro-intestinal tract: The influences of fed/fasting states. Expert Opin. Drug Deliv. 2019, 16, 1031–1035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Itin, C.; Barasch, D.; Domb, A.J.; Hoffman, A. Prolonged oral transmucosal delivery of highly lipophilic drug cannabidiol. Int. J. Pharm. 2020, 581, 119276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Birnbaum, A.K.; Karanam, A.; Marino, S.E.; Barkley, C.M.; Remmel, R.P.; Roslawski, M.; Gramling-Aden, M.; Leppik, I.E. Food effect on pharmacokinetics of cannabidiol oral capsules in adult patients with refractory epilepsy. Epilepsia 2019, 60, 1586–1592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Stott, C.G.; White, L.; Wright, S.; Wilbraham, D.; Guy, G.W. A phase i study to assess the effect of food on the single dose bioavailability of the THC/CBD oromucosal spray. Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2013, 69, 825–834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Taylor, L.; Gidal, B.; Blakey, G.; Tayo, B.; Morrison, G. A Phase I, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Single Ascending Dose, Multiple Dose, and Food Effect Trial of the Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics of Highly Purified Cannabidiol in Healthy Subjects. CNS Drugs 2018, 32, 1053–1067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Porter, C.J.H.; Trevaskis, N.L.; Charman, W.N. Lipids and lipid-based formulations: Optimizing the oral delivery of lipophilic drugs. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2007, 6, 231–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Zgair, A.; Wong, J.C.M.; Lee, J.B.; Mistry, J.; Sivak, O.; Wasan, K.M.; Hennig, I.M.; Barrett, D.A.; Constantinescu, C.S.; Fischer, P.M.; et al. Dietary fats and pharmaceutical lipid excipients increase systemic exposure to orally administered cannabis and cannabis-based medicines. Am. J. Transl. Res. 2016, 8, 3448–3459. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  23. Wu, C.Y.; Benet, L.Z. Predicting drug disposition via application of BCS: Transport/absorption/ elimination interplay and development of a biopharmaceutics drug disposition classification system. Pharm. Res. 2005, 22, 11–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Ingels, F.; Beck, B.; Oth, M.; Augustijns, P. Effect of simulated intestinal fluid on drug permeability estimation across Caco-2 monolayers. Int. J. Pharm. 2004, 274, 221–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Morrison, G.; Crockett, J.; Blakey, G.; Sommerville, K. A Phase 1, Open-Label, Pharmacokinetic Trial to Investigate Possible Drug-Drug Interactions Between Clobazam, Stiripentol, or Valproate and Cannabidiol in Healthy Subjects. Clin. Pharmacol. Drug Dev. 2019, 8, 1009–1031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Taylor, L.; Crockett, J.; Tayo, B.; Morrison, G. A Phase 1, Open-Label, Parallel-Group, Single-Dose Trial of the Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Cannabidiol (CBD) in Subjects With Mild to Severe Hepatic Impairment. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2019, 59, 1110–1119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ohlsson, A.; Lindgren, J.-E.; Andersson, S.; Agurell, S.; Gillespie, H.; Hollister, L.E. Single-dose kinetics of deuterium-labelled cannabidiol in man after smoking and intravenous administration. Biol. Mass Spectrom. 1986, 13, 77–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Spindle, T.R.; Cone, E.J.; Goffi, E.; Weerts, E.M.; Mitchell, J.M.; Winecker, R.E.; Bigelow, G.E.; Flegel, R.R.; Vandrey, R. Pharmacodynamic effects of vaporized and oral cannabidiol (CBD) and vaporized CBD-dominant cannabis in infrequent cannabis users. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020, 211, 107937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Bruni, N.; Pepa, C.D.; Oliaro-Bosso, S.; Pessione, E.; Gastaldi, D.; Dosio, F. Cannabinoid delivery systems for pain and inflammation treatment. Molecules 2018, 23, 2478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Mazzetti, C.; Ferri, E.; Pozzi, M.; Labra, M. Quantification of the content of cannabinol in commercially available e-liquids and studies on their thermal and photo-stability. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Citti, C.; Russo, F.; Linciano, P.; Strallhofer, S.S.; Tolomeo, F.; Forni, F.; Vandelli, M.A.; Gigli, G.; Cannazza, G. Origin of Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol Impurity in Synthetic Cannabidiol. Cannabis Cannabinoid Res. 2020, can.2020.0021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. FAIRBAIRN, J.W.; LIEBMANN, J.A.; ROWAN, M.G. The stability of cannabis and its preparations on storage. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 1976, 28, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Calvi, L.; Pentimalli, D.; Panseri, S.; Giupponi, L.; Gelmini, F.; Beretta, G.; Vitali, D.; Bruno, M.; Zilio, E.; Pavlovic, R.; et al. Comprehensive quality evaluation of medical Cannabis sativa L. inflorescence and macerated oils based on HS-SPME coupled to GC–MS and LC-HRMS (q-exactive orbitrap®) approach. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2018, 150, 208–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Millar, S.A.; Stone, N.L.; Bellman, Z.D.; Yates, A.S.; England, T.J.; O’Sullivan, S.E. A systematic review of cannabidiol dosing in clinical populations. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2019, 85, 1888–1900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Chesney, E.; Oliver, D.; Green, A.; Sovi, S.; Wilson, J.; Englund, A.; Freeman, T.P.; McGuire, P. Adverse effects of cannabidiol: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Neuropsychopharmacology 2020, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Iffland, K.; Grotenhermen, F. An Update on Safety and Side Effects of Cannabidiol: A Review of Clinical Data and Relevant Animal Studies. Cannabis Cannabinoid Res. 2017, 2, 139–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Franco, V.; Perucca, E. Pharmacological and Therapeutic Properties of Cannabidiol for Epilepsy. Drugs 2019, 79, 1435–1454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Devinsky, O.; Patel, A.D.; Thiele, E.A.; Wong, M.H.; Appleton, R.; Harden, C.L.; Greenwood, S.; Morrison, G.; Sommerville, K. Randomized, dose-ranging safety trial of cannabidiol in Dravet syndrome. Neurology 2018, 90, e1204–e1211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Brown, J.; Winterstein, A. Potential Adverse Drug Events and Drug–Drug Interactions with Medical and Consumer Cannabidiol (CBD) Use. J. Clin. Med. 2019, 8, 989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Devinsky, O.; Cross, J.H.; Laux, L.; Marsh, E.; Miller, I.; Nabbout, R.; Scheffer, I.E.; Thiele, E.A.; Wright, S. Trial of Cannabidiol for Drug-Resistant Seizures in the Dravet Syndrome. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017, 376, 2011–2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Pamplona, F.A.; Da Silva, L.R.; Coan, A.C. Potential clinical benefits of CBD-Rich cannabis extracts over purified CBD in treatment-resistant epilepsy: Observational data meta-analysis. Front. Neurol. 2018, 9, 759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Zendulka, O.; Dovrtělová, G.; Nosková, K.; Turjap, M.; Šulcová, A.; Hanuš, L.; Juřica, J. Cannabinoids and Cytochrome P450 Interactions. Curr. Drug Metab. 2016, 17, 206–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Devinsky, O.; Marsh, E.; Friedman, D. Cannabidiol in patients with treatment-resistant epilepsy - Authors’ reply. Lancet Neurol. 2016, 15, 545–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Groeneveld, G.J.; Martin, J.H. Parasitic pharmacology: A plausible mechanism of action for cannabidiol. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2020, 86, 189–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Devinsky, O.; Thiele, E.A.; Wright, S.; Checketts, D.; Morrison, G.; Dunayevich, E.; Knappertz, V. Cannabidiol efficacy independent of clobazam: Meta-analysis of four randomized controlled trials. Acta Neurol. Scand. 2020, ane.13305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. HIGHLIGHTS OF PRESCRIBING INFORMATION. Available online: www.fda.gov/medwatch (accessed on 28 August 2020).
  47. Kocis, P.T.; Vrana, K.E. Delta-9-Tetrahydrocannabinol and Cannabidiol Drug-Drug Interactions. Med. Cannabis Cannabinoids 2020, 3, 61–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. WHO. WHO Drug Information; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  49. Pudipeddi, M.; Serajuddin, A.T.M. Trends in Solubility of Polymorphs. J. Pharm. Sci. 2005, 94, 929–939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. FDA. Guidance for Industry ANDAs: Pharmaceutical Solid Polymorphism Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Controls Information. 2007. Available online: https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/andaspharmaceutical-solid-polymorphism-chemistry-manufacturing-and-controls-information (accessed on 28 August 2020).
  51. Knaub, K.; Sartorius, T.; Dharsono, T.; Wacker, R.; Wilhelm, M.; Schön, C. A novel self-emulsifying drug delivery system (SEDDS) based on Vesisorb® formulation technology improving the oral bioavailability of cannabidiol in healthy subjects. Molecules 2019, 24, 2967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Atsmon, J.; Cherniakov, I.; Izgelov, D.; Hoffman, A.; Domb, A.J.; Deutsch, L.; Deutsch, F.; Heffetz, D.; Sacks, H. PTL401, a New Formulation Based on Pro-Nano Dispersion Technology, Improves Oral Cannabinoids Bioavailability in Healthy Volunteers. J. Pharm. Sci. 2018, 107, 1423–1429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Atsmon, J.; Heffetz, D.; Deutsch, L.; Deutsch, F.; Sacks, H. Single-Dose Pharmacokinetics of Oral Cannabidiol Following Administration of PTL101: A New Formulation Based on Gelatin Matrix Pellets Technology. Clin. Pharmacol. Drug Dev. 2018, 7, 751–758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Cherniakov, I.; Izgelov, D.; Barasch, D.; Davidson, E.; Domb, A.J.; Hoffman, A. Piperine-pro-nanolipospheres as a novel oral delivery system of cannabinoids: Pharmacokinetic evaluation in healthy volunteers in comparison to buccal spray administration. J. Control. Release 2017, 266, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Liu, Z.X.; Artmann, C. Relative bioavailability comparison of different coenzyme Q10 formulations with a novel delivery system. Altern. Ther. Health Med. 2009, 15, 42–46. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  56. Nakano, Y.; Tajima, M.; Sugiyama, E.; Sato, V.H.; Sato, H. Development of a Novel Nano emulsion Formulation to Improve Intestinal Absorption of Cannabidiol. Med. Cannabis Cannabinoids 2019, 2, 35–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Research & Development—Ananda Scientific. Available online: https://www.anandascientific.com/research-development/groundbreaking-delivery-technology/ (accessed on 24 August 2020).
  58. Aphios Pharma LLC—Aphios. Available online: https://aphios.com/investors/investors-overview/aphios-pharma-llc/ (accessed on 24 August 2020).
  59. Pipeline—Artelo Biosciences. Available online: https://artelobio.com/pipeline/ (accessed on 24 August 2020).
  60. Evaluation of BTX 1503 in Patients With Moderate to Severe Acne Vulgaris—Full Text View—ClinicalTrials.gov. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03573518 (accessed on 24 August 2020).
  61. Pipeline—Botanix Pharmaceuticals. Available online: https://botanixpharma.com/pipeline/ (accessed on 24 August 2020).
  62. Study of the Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of BTX 1204 in Patients With Moderate Atopic Dermatitis—Full Text View—ClinicalTrials.gov. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03824405 (accessed on 24 August 2020).
  63. Columbia Care Announces Collaboration with IPS Specials and Grow Biotech to Import BeneCeedTM Tablets to the United Kingdom for Clinical Study—Columbia Care. Available online: https://col-care.com/2019/08/22/columbia-care-announces-collaboration-with-ips-specials-and-grow-biotech-to-import-beneceed-tablets-to-the-united-kingdom-for-clinical-study/ (accessed on 24 August 2020).
  64. A Study of the Efficacy of Cannabidiol in Patients With Multiple Myeloma, Glioblastoma Multiforme, and GI Malignancies—Full Text View—ClinicalTrials.gov. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03607643 (accessed on 24 August 2020).
  65. Development of Cannabinoid based medicines—Echo Pharmaceuticals. Available online: https://www.echo-pharma.com/clinical-development/ (accessed on 24 August 2020).
  66. Evaluation of Safety, Tolerability and Preliminary Efficacy of EHP-101 in Diffuse Cutaneous Systemic Sclerosis—Full Text View—ClinicalTrials.gov. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04166552 (accessed on 24 August 2020).
  67. Therapeutic Areas. GW Pharmaceuticals, plc. Available online: https://www.gwpharm.co.uk/healthcare-professionals/research/therapeutic-areas (accessed on 24 August 2020).
  68. Kalytera Therapeutics, Inc. Available online: https://kalytera.co/programs/preclinical/ (accessed on 24 July 2020).
  69. Patrician, A.; Versic-Bratincevic, M.; Mijacika, T.; Banic, I.; Marendic, M.; Sutlović, D.; Dujić, Ž.; Ainslie, P.N. Examination of a New Delivery Approach for Oral Cannabidiol in Healthy Subjects: A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Pharmacokinetics Study. Adv. Ther. 2019, 36, 3196–3210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Cannabinoid Supplementation on Vascular and Cognitive Function—Full Text View—ClinicalTrials.gov. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03295903 (accessed on 24 August 2020).
  71. CA2476833C—Novel methylated cyclodextrin complexes—Google Patents. Available online: https://patents.google.com/patent/CA2476833C/zh (accessed on 24 August 2020).
  72. PreveCeutical Medical Inc. Available online: https://www.preveceutical.com/pipeline/cannabinoid-sol-gel/ (accessed on 24 August 2020).
  73. PureForm CBDTM—PureForm Global. Available online: https://www.pureformglobal.com/pureform-cbd (accessed on 24 August 2020).
  74. Kingsley, K.; Lee, S.; Greenbaum, E.; Vireo Health LLC. Cannabinoid formulations with improved solubility. U.S. Patent US2019030170, 31 January 2019. Available online: https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/patent/US2019030170 (accessed on 24 August 2020).
  75. Heussler, H.; Cohen, J.; Silove, N.; Tich, N.; Bonn-Miller, M.O.; Du, W.; O’Neill, C.; Sebree, T. A phase 1/2, open-label assessment of the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of transdermal cannabidiol (ZYN002) for the treatment of pediatric fragile X syndrome. J. Neurodev. Disord. 2019, 11, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Yin, H.S.; Wolf, M.S.; Dreyer, B.P.; Sanders, L.M.; Parker, R.M. Evaluation of consistency in dosing directions and measuring devices for pediatric nonprescription liquid medications. JAMA J. Am. Med. Assoc. 2010, 304, 2595–2602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Shonna Yin, H.; Parker, R.M.; Sanders, L.M.; Dreyer, B.P.; Mendelsohn, A.L.; Bailey, S.; Patel, D.A.; Jimenez, J.J.; Kim, K.Y.A.; Jacobson, K.; et al. Liquid medication errors and dosing tools: A randomized controlled experiment. Pediatrics 2016, 138. [Google Scholar]
  78. Wade, D.T.; Makela, P.M.; House, H.; Bateman, C.; Robson, P. Long-term use of a cannabis-based medicine in the treatment of spasticity and other symptoms in multiple sclerosis. Mult. Scler. 2006, 12, 639–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. WO2009004302A1—Use of Tetrahydrocannabinol and/or Cannabidiol for the Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease—Google Patents. Available online: https://patents.google.com/patent/WO2009004302A1/en (accessed on 20 August 2020).
  80. Dickman, D.; Levin, D. Crystalline Form of Cannabidiol. 2017. Available online: http://www.freepatentsonline.com/y2017/0349518.html (accessed on 24 August 2020).
  81. Pivotal Science—PureForm Global. Available online: https://www.pureformglobal.com/pivotal-science (accessed on 24 August 2020).
  82. Emami, S.; Siahi-Shadbad, M.; Adibkia, K.; Barzegar-Jalali, M. Recent advances in improving oral drug bioavailability by cocrystals. BioImpacts 2018, 8, 305–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Duggirala, N.K.; Perry, M.L.; Almarsson, Ö.; Zaworotko, M.J. Pharmaceutical cocrystals: Along the path to improved medicines. Chem. Commun. 2016, 52, 640–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Bolla, G.; Nangia, A. Pharmaceutical cocrystals: Walking the talk. Chem. Commun. 2016, 52, 8342–8360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Trask, A.V. An overview of pharmaceutical cocrystals as intellectual property. Mol. Pharm. 2007, 4, 301–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  86. Fala, L. Entresto (Sacubitril/valsartan): First-in-class angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor FDA approved for patients with heart failure. Am. Heal. Drug Benefits 2015, 8, 330. [Google Scholar]
  87. Petruševski, G.; Naumov, P.; Jovanovski, G.; Bogoeva-Gaceva, G.; Seik, W.N. Solid-state forms of sodium valproate, active component of the anticonvulsant drug epilim. ChemMedChem 2008, 3, 1377–1386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Mannila, J.; Järvinen, T.; Järvinen, K.; Jarho, P. Precipitation complexation method produces cannabidiol/β-cyclodextrin inclusion complex suitable for sublingual administration of cannabidiol. J. Pharm. Sci. 2007, 96, 312–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Gabriele Reich Formulation and physical properties of soft capsules. In Pharmaceutical Capsules; Pharmaceutical Press: London, UK, 2004; Available online: https://www.pharmpress.com/files/docs/Chap 11.pdf (accessed on 24 August 2020).
Table
Table 1. Cannabidiol (CBD) formulations under development by commercial companies (presented in alphabetical order) with information in the public domain. Abbreviations: CBD, cannabidiol; i.v., intravenous; N/A, not available; NHIE, Neonatal Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy; TMP, tetramethylpyrazine; PPARγ, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma; CB2, cannabinoid type 2 receptor; US, ultrasound; BBB, blood–brain barrier.
Table 1. Cannabidiol (CBD) formulations under development by commercial companies (presented in alphabetical order) with information in the public domain. Abbreviations: CBD, cannabidiol; i.v., intravenous; N/A, not available; NHIE, Neonatal Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy; TMP, tetramethylpyrazine; PPARγ, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma; CB2, cannabinoid type 2 receptor; US, ultrasound; BBB, blood–brain barrier.
CompanyNameFormulation (If Available)DeliveryPK Data/OtherClinical DevelopmentReferences
Ananda ScientificEnhanced CBDANANDA’s Liquid Structure™ Enhanced CBDN/A (presumed oral)Reported as: fully water soluble (100%); high bioavailability (20× more than other CBD oils at 30 min); no degradation in stomach; stable—storable at room temperature for at least 2 years; consistent dosing—reliable results with usePhase 1 studies underway for indications: neuropathic pain and opioid replacement and withdrawal[57]
AphiosAPH-1501Nanoencapsulated Cannabidiol Time Released Capsules; CBD encapsulated in biodegradable polymer nanospheres as a lyophilised powderOral capsuleN/APhase 2 trial planned for the treatment of opioid addiction[58]
Artelo BiosciencesART12.11Co-crystal solid state formulation with TMPOralN/APre-clinical development for PTSD, IBD, Stroke and Rare Diseases [59]
Botanix PharmaceuticalsBTX1503GelTransdermalN/APhase 1b study completed, phase 2 study underway in moderate to severe acne[60]
BTX1308GelTransdermalN/APhase 1b study planned in Plaque psoriasis[61]
BTX1204GelTransdermalN/APhase 1b study—unknown status. Phase 2 study recruiting. Indication: atopic dermatitis[62]
BTX 1701Facial cleanser utilising Permetrex™ skin delivery technology in conjunction with a novel oil clearing agentFacial cleanserN/ASmall clinical study performed in mild acne[61]
Columbia CareBeneCeed200 mg CBD tabletOralN/AN/A[63]
Diverse Biotech Inc.BRCX014Sublingual formulationSublingualN/ATwo registered phase 1/2 trials in Cancer[64]
Echo PharmaceuticalsArvisolLipophilic compound delivery technology Alitra®OralClaims to improve bioavailability and steadier temporal profilePreclinical – indicated for Rett Syndrome—Epilepsy, and Schziophrenia[65]
Emerald Health PharmaceuticalsEHP-101Synthetic CBD designed to enhance the therapeutic benefits of CBD by being a dual PPARγ and CB2 agonistOral liquidN/APhase 1 trial completed in healthy volunteers but no results published yet. Phase 2a trial registered but not yet recruiting for Diffuse Cutaneous Systemic Sclerosis[66]
GW PharmaceuticalsGWP42003NAi.v.N/APhase 1 trial completed in NHIE [67]
KalyteraK-1052CBD +(S)-2-amino-(1-iminoethylamino)-5-thioheptanoic acid (iNOS inhibitor) coupled pro-drug moleculei.v.N/AIn vivo efficacy studies in rodents completed in Sepsis-induced Acute Renal Failure and Traumatic Brain Injury[68]
KAL-1816CBD conjugated with naproxenOral and i.v.N/APatents filed in acute and chronic pain[68]
K-1022Bi-sulphate derivative of CBDOralWater solubleIn vivo efficacy studies performed in Ulcerative Colitis; currently ADME/PK analysis in rats, as well as non-clinical safety assessment of K-1022 in rats and dogs[68]
K-1012Bi-phosphate derivative of CBD; novel aerosolised formulationIntra-tracheallySoluble in aqueous solution; expected to increase the bioavailabilityIn vivo efficacy studies carried out in rodents in Adult Respiratory Distress Syndrome[68]
K-1032L-valine-ester derivative of CBDTopical deliveryN/AIn vivo efficacy models in rodents conducted in chronic inflammatory skin diseases[68]
Lexaria Bioscience CorpTurboCBDCapsules also containing American ginseng, ginkgo biloba, and organic hemp oil using DehydraTECH™ delivery technologyOralIncreased circulating CBD levels compared to control CBD (+86% at 90 min)On the market (over the counter)[69,70]
Medexus PharmaceuticalsCA2476833CComplex of RM-β-, DM-β and TM-β cyclodextrin with CBDN/AImprove aqueous solubility, dissolution rate, absorption and bioavailability N/A [71]
PreveceuticalSol-GelCBD gelIntranasalExpected to increase bioavailabilityPre-clinical evidence to suggest better distribution along the olfactory epithelia[72]
PureForm GlobalPureForm CBDMolecularly identical, non-hemp-based CBD, developed using InterMolecular Stacking TechnologyLiquid and powderExpected to improve solubility and stabilityN/A[73]
SatipharmGelpell (PLT-101)CBD in gelatine beads encapsulated in gastro-resistant capsulesOral30% higher bioavailability compared to oromucosal spray.Phase 1 and phase 2 (efficacy in paediatric epilepsy) trials completed[1,52]
Vireo Health LLCUS2019030170CBD and a sulfoalkyl ether cyclodextrinN/AIncrease water solubilityN/A[74]
Zynerba PharmaceuticalsZygelTM ZYN002Permeation-enhanced gelTransdermalN/APre-clinical, phase 1 and phase 2 trials all underway in Fragile X syndrome and other rare neuro-psychiatric conditions[75]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Millar, S.A.; Maguire, R.F.; Yates, A.S.; O’Sullivan, S.E. Towards Better Delivery of Cannabidiol (CBD). Pharmaceuticals 2020, 13, 219. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph13090219

AMA Style

Millar SA, Maguire RF, Yates AS, O’Sullivan SE. Towards Better Delivery of Cannabidiol (CBD). Pharmaceuticals. 2020; 13(9):219. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph13090219

Chicago/Turabian Style

Millar, Sophie Anne, Ryan Francis Maguire, Andrew Stephen Yates, and Saoirse Elizabeth O’Sullivan. 2020. "Towards Better Delivery of Cannabidiol (CBD)" Pharmaceuticals 13, no. 9: 219. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph13090219

APA Style

Millar, S. A., Maguire, R. F., Yates, A. S., & O’Sullivan, S. E. (2020). Towards Better Delivery of Cannabidiol (CBD). Pharmaceuticals, 13(9), 219. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph13090219

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop