Next Article in Journal
Environmental Risk Factors and Health: An Umbrella Review of Meta-Analyses
Next Article in Special Issue
Internal and External Load Variations in Young Students: Comparisons between Small-Sided Games and Small-Sided Games Combined with Strength Training during Physical Education Classes
Previous Article in Journal
Comorbidities at Diagnosis, Survival, and Cause of Death in Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: A Population-Based Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
How Does the Execution of the Pilates Method and Therapeutic Exercise Influence Back Pain and Postural Alignment in Children Who Play String Instruments? A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 18
Issue 2
10.3390/ijerph18020703
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Physical Activity and Daily Routine among Children Aged 0–12 during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Spain

by
Javier Cachón-Zagalaz
1,
M.ª Luisa Zagalaz-Sánchez
1,
Víctor Arufe-Giráldez
2,
Alberto Sanmiguel-Rodríguez
3,4 and
Gabriel González-Valero
1,*
1
Department of Didactics of Musical, Plastic and Body Expression, Faculty of Humanities and Educational Sciences, University of Jaén, 23071 Jaén, Spain
2
Specific Didactics Department, Research and Diagnostic Methods in Education, Education Faculty, University of a Coruña, 15001 Coruña, Spain
3
Faculty of Language and Education, University of Antonio de Nebrija, 28015 Madrid, Spain
4
Faculty of Language and Education, University of Camilo José Cela, 28692 Madrid, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18(2), 703; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18020703
Submission received: 1 October 2020 / Revised: 4 January 2021 / Accepted: 12 January 2021 / Published: 15 January 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Physical Activity in Childhood and Adolescence)
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted the lives of many people. Objective: The aim of the present study was to analyse the physical activity (PA) and daily routine among children (0–12 years) during lockdown and to establish the main relationships among the variables. Methods: A quantitative study with a descriptive–comparative and cross-sectional design carried out. The sample, selected for convenience, consisted of 837 Spanish children aged 0–12. The “Children and confinement” questionnaire was used, distributed electronically through Google Forms and social networks and activated for 45 days. The individuals participating in this study were mainly children (50.2%) who were in primary education (44.8%). Predominantly, the families of participants were biparental (87.9%), with established routines and schedules (85.7%). Results and conclusions: The use of digital screens is an important part of children’s daily routine. Their daily activities were practiced for more than three–six years, with more by girls. The time children devoted to sleep was directly proportional to the time they devoted to physical activity and indirectly proportional to the time they spent watching screens. The children who slept the most were those aged zero–three years, especially girls, who belonged to large families. The levels of physical activity in the sample were low, as were the times spent on activities such as music or games.

1. Introduction

Physical activity (PA) constitutes one of the fundamental pillars for the correct physical and psychological developments of a child. Furthermore, it is considered an essential means for the prevention of pathologies, improvement of health and can contribute to reducing childhood obesity [1,2,3]. Thus, childhood should be seen as a critical time for promoting healthy behaviours insofar as PA and energy balance [4] and can impact multiple health and developmental outcomes, including psychosocial well-being [5]. According to Hinkley et al. [5], psychosocial well-being is vital for children’s school readiness and future mental health.
During the confinement in Spain, the activities that children could perform on a regular basis became altered. In particular, practicing the recommended amount of physical activity was made more difficult by the closing of sports facilities and parks [6].
Lockdowns can be more harmful for those who share a home with many live-in partners. Therefore, Rolla [7] recommended spending more time outdoors as a way of mitigating the high rate of overcrowding among the most disadvantaged homes in Spain. Therefore, children can interpret lockdown and the threat of COVID-19 as a danger that causes them anxiety. Even children under two years of age have noticed the changes in their lives and the possible absences of caregivers (grandparents). It is important to address these states of anxiety [8] and the psychological impacts of the quarantine [9]. In recent months, 72% of children and 77% of adults have reported a worsening of their emotional health, and 55% of families have reported an increase in parent–child conflicts at home [10].
Currently, physical exercise (PE) classes at school are the only spaces where children and youngsters can do compulsory physical activity. It should be a space for body movement, fun and gratifying emotions [11], as this subject influences many aspects of their daily lives [12]. Above all, PA contributes enormously to healthy behaviours, and the three-month lockdown prevented children from exercising sufficiently [6], which was associated with weight gain [13]. The WHO [14,15] indicates that children and youngsters aged 5–17 years should invest in at least 60 min per day of moderate-to-vigorous PA.
To alleviate the effects of the pandemic and lockdown on children’s learning, Save the Children created the programme “At your side”. According to this nongovernmental organisation (NGO) [10], the digital divide has affected 39% of children, and 64% have found it difficult to keep up with their schooling due to a lack of support by adults. Guan et al. [16] also provided recommendations for daily PA time to counteract the effects of lockdown and the increased use of digital technologies. These authors gave recommendations to parents and caregivers for the promotion of healthy daily behaviours. Referring specifically to crises in the Spanish education system caused by COVID-19, Gómez-Gerdel [17] mentioned some advantages to virtual education, namely the possibility for children to acquire greater autonomy in daily household tasks and to improve family relations by spending more time together [18].
The WHO [19] and other researchers [20] have warned against screen abuse and physical inactivity in early childhood. Although the excessive use of Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) by children is nothing new [21], the lockdown has compounded the effect in children and adults [22]. Since computer use and Internet access are practically universal, many researchers [23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31] have proposed prevention programmes and instruments to detect addictions and other behaviour problems. To improve the situation, a healthy mix of lifestyle behaviours in childhood involving less screen time, healthy eating patterns and balanced daily PA, is endorsed [32].
Daily routines are an important aspect of childhood development. These include activities such as homework [33,34], participation in domestic chores [35,36,37,38], reading and learning to play a musical instrument [39,40]. Family- or parent-led play can be particularly influential [41]. Some studies have reported a clear association between families’ levels of happiness and time spent playing with children [42]. Free play is also important in promoting skills such as thinking and creativity and can predict social success in adulthood, especially if there is an optimal amount of PA [43,44].
The time spent away from school will have a greater impact in grades where children have to achieve an important learning outcome, such as reading and writing in the last year of preschool [45]. Nevertheless, sociologists and educationalists assure that the youthfulness of these children and the good work of their teachers will allow them to recover the knowledge missing during lockdown in a short time.
Only when the pandemic ends will it be possible to evaluate the total health and social, educational and economic impacts [46] in terms of negative changes in the lifestyles of Spanish children during the COVID-19 lockdown (from 15 March to 2 June) and aggravated by the long period of time without attending school. The aim of the present study was to analyse the PA and daily routines carried out by the child population (0–12 years) during the lockdown, as well as to establish the main relationships among the variables. We hypothesised that PA at home during lockdown would be lower than usual, that healthy behaviours would be affected by the lack of movement and that daily routines would primarily be inclined toward using digital screen devices.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Design and Participants

Our quantitative study was carried out using a descriptive, comparative and cross-sectional design, in which a single measurement was made for a single group. The sample was composed of 837 Spanish children aged 0–12 years (M = 6.22; SD = 3.36). The selection of the participants was done by convenience; families with children in the infant and primary education stages during the COVID-19 pandemic were invited to participate, and we had easy access to them. The distribution of the sample was homogeneous, represented by 50.2% for boys (n = 420) and 49.8% for girls (n = 417)—in total, 837 children of school-going ages from 0 to 12 years old. Table 1 shows the distribution of the sample according to the region (Comunidad Autónoma) in Spain.

2.2. Variables and Instruments

Sociodemographic variables. For this variable, an ad hoc questionnaire was used, which was prepared by us and in which we recorded the sex (categorised as “boy” or “girl”); age; type of family (categorised as “biparental”, “single parent”, “numerous family” or “biparental with separation”) and the establishment of routines and schedules in the children (categorised as “yes” or “no”). These categories were created on the basis of the main characteristics collected by the National Institute of Statistics (INE). This questionnaire is similar to the already existing ones and forms the basis for the very specific data that are collected by any instrument of these characteristics, so it does not need validation. However, the questions formulated were validated by expert judgement and served as a pilot study to provide a solution to the current problem. In addition, various items of the questionnaire created ad hoc were extracted from the validated questionnaire on Equipment and Use of Information and Communication Technologies in Homes (TIC-H2019) prepared by the National Institute of Statistics (INE) following the recommendations of the Statistical Office of the European Union (EUROSTAT), from which items related to the use of technological devices were extracted.
Healthy behaviours. This variable was recorded in order to know and count the time that children performed sedentary behaviours, such as the use of digital screens (time in front of video consoles, televisions, computers, tablets and mobile phones). This data was collected in minutes. The hours dedicated to sleep and the sum of the time spent on PA during lockdown were recorded, being in turn categorised from “does not practice” to “practices 6 to 7 times per week”.
Daily activities during lockdown. This variable refers to the activities usually carried out by the children at home during the lockdown period, such as artistic work, school and domestic chores, free and family play, listening to music or dancing and/or reading. The sum of the time spent by the child in these types of activities during the period of lockdown was recorded in minutes.

2.3. Procedure

The “Children and Lockdown” questionnaire was developed by seven experts from the fields of general didactics, psychology, body expression and sport. After checking the data and the assessment of the questions, a 93% correlation rate was obtained. This was calculated by observing the experts’ findings, dividing it by the total number of items and multiplying by 100. The questionnaire was created on the Google Forms platform and disseminated through social networks to reach the population under investigation, parents with children from 0 to 12 years of age, because children are not trained to give the necessary answers, especially the youngest ones. Likewise, contacts of various education professionals who had access to a large number of families were used to ensure that the questionnaire was well-distributed in the different autonomous communities.
The questionnaire was activated for 45 days (from 23 March to 6 May 2020) within the lockdown period established by the Spanish government [47]. Of all the questionnaires received in the database, 76 were eliminated, because they were not correctly completed or belonged to another educational stage.
By completing the form, all the participants gave their consent to anonymously work with the data. Throughout the research, the ethical principles reflected in different official documents and treaties on research ethics were taken into account, thus guaranteeing the anonymity of the participants, the confidentiality of the data reflected in the questionnaire and other ethical considerations related to educational research [48,49].

2.4. Data Analysis

A descriptive analysis was used to determine the sociodemographic characteristics and behaviours during the COVID-19 pandemic using the mean deviation (M), standard deviation (SD) and frequencies (%). We also used the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test to determine the normality and homogeneity of the variances in the variables. To establish the differences between the variables, we used the Student’s t-test for independent samples and the one-factor ANOVA, employing Pearson’s chi-square statistical indicator to verify such differences. Pearson’s bivariate correlations were thus used to establish relationships between the parameters with mean values at the significance levels of p = 0.01 and p = 0.05. The statistical software SPSS 25.0 (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY, USA) was used for data analysis and processing.

2.5. Ethical Aspects

By completing the form, all participants gave their consent to work anonymously with the data. Throughout the research, the ethical principles reflected in different documents and official treaties on research ethics were taken into account, guaranteeing the anonymity of the participants, the confidentiality of the data reflected in the questionnaire and other ethical considerations related to educational research [48].

3. Results

Table 2 shows the main characteristics of the study sample. The majority were male (50.2%) and represented the primary education stage (44.8%). The predominant type of family was the two-parent family (87.9%), who highlighted that routines and schedules were established to perform tasks (85.7%), although the highest percentage of children did not perform PA for six days a week in lockdown (34.8%) but was very close to those who practiced it between two and three days a week.
Table 3 presents children’s healthy, everyday behaviours related to their sex and the establishment of routines and schedules for tasks. Statistically significant results were obtained from both relationships (p ≤ 0.05). Girls slept more hours a day (M = 10.04; SD = 1.53) and spent more time on daily activities (M = 428.22; SD = 185.24). However, boys spent more time in front of digital screens (M = 163.29; SD = 125.27) compared to girls (M = 152.05; SD = 124.45). Families that did establish routines and schedules for performing tasks were associated with more time spent practicing daily PA (M = 38.13; SD = 35.01). However, those who did not establish them showed a greater number of hours sleeping (M = 10.32; SD = 1.64) and in front of digital screens (M = 186; SD = 135.20).
Table 4 shows children’s healthy, everyday behaviours in relation to age and family type. With respect to age (p ≤ 0.05), higher average values were observed in primary education (6–12 years) for daily PA practice (M = 38.95; SD = 30.25) and the use of digital screens (M = 213.78; SD = 133.12). The highest parameters for daily activities (M = 441.83; SD = 160.48) were in the second cycle of infant education and, for sleep hours (M = 10.98; SD = 1.82), in the first cycle of that stage. According to the type of family (p ≤ 0.05), a greater use of screens was shown in two-parent families who are separated (M = 192.65; SD = 105.05), more hours of sleeping in large families (M = 10.66; SD = 1.32) and daily activities in single-parent families (M = 510.13; SD = 207.49).
Table 5 shows the results related to PA practice during lockdown as a function of children’s healthy and daily behaviours, for which statistically significant data were obtained (p ≤ 0.05). It was confirmed that those who spent more time on PA were those who practiced it six to seven days/week (M = 75.09; SD = 58.65), as opposed to the use of digital screens; those who did not practice PA spent more time on them (M = 173.09; SD = 115.56). Similarly, those who recorded the most hours of sleep (M = 10.19; SD = 0.57) and spent the most time on daily activities (M = 476.52; SD = 180.50) were those who performed PA six to seven days/week.
Table 6 relates healthy, everyday behaviours with the age of the participants. During lockdown, a direct and positive correlation was established between age with daily PA practice (r = 0.168 *) and the use of digital screens (r = 0.595 **), with the relationship with daily sleep hours being indirect and negative (r = −0.547 **), the latter two (digital screens and sleep hours) registering a mean relationship strength. Thus, sleeping hours were indirectly associated with the use of digital screens (r = −0.395 **). Finally, daily activities during lockdown were directly associated with the use of digital screens (r = 0.234 **) and daily PA practice (r = 0.301 **).

4. Discussion

In this sense, teachers need data that allow them to develop the education of students—in this case, in infant and primary education—and for this, we investigated how the pandemic has influenced the activities of Spanish children from zero to 12 years, such as PA; healthy behaviours and daily activities (artistic work, school and home chores, free play and family, listening to music or dance and/or reading).
Five months without physically attending school carries the risk that the objectives established for each year will not be met; this will have to be checked and, if necessary, corrected to ensure that the right to education of school-going children prevails. A partnership between the government and academic communities can be a key component of the public health response to an emergency, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, in which we agree with Cruz-Correa et al. [50].
We know and proved in this study that PE influences many aspects of children’s daily lives [12] and contributes to the acquisition or improvement of healthy behaviours and, therefore, in physical and emotional development. A lack of PA is associated with obesity and other health problems [13]. This was expressed by the WHO [14,15] and was taken up by Guan et al. [16] when they praised the importance of PA to avoid child sedentarism as an effect of lockdown. They indicated that data from the pre-COVID-19 period showed that, on average, only a fifth of preschoolers and less than 10% of school-aged children met all PA and movement guidelines. According to other researchers [51], low percentages of PA in preschool-aged children have been found. Similarly, Ji et al. [52] indicated that Chinese preschool students performed little PA. Although Arufe et al. [53] believed that children under 12 years of age performed a minimum amount of PA with friends in sports schools in times of lockdown, the activities performed at home increased.
Likewise, Gómez-Gerdel [17] talked about the crisis in the Spanish educational system originated by COVID-19 and virtual education, something that contradicts our results, as children spend many hours using digital screens and parents complain about not knowing how well online teaching works, despite the fact there are programs to help families by Save the Children [10] and “A tu lado”, for example. In contrast, some authors, such as Navarrete et al. [54], believe that technological tools also help and support the teaching–learning process for people with disabilities, favouring inclusion.
We tried to find out how long children engage in sedentary behaviours with the manipulation of digital screens (sitting in front of game consoles, televisions, computers, tablets and mobile phones), despite the fact that, sometimes, playing with a mobile phone for 10 to 20 min can affect their balance and cause dizziness [55]. We compared this usage with the hours of sleep and the time spent performing PA (from no practice to six to seven times practicing a week).
This use and/or abuse of digital screens has become one of the daily activities that appears in our study counteracted by PA [19,20]. The problem is that it can become an addiction or behavioural complication [23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31]. The use of screens [21], together with schoolwork [33,34], domestic occupations [35,36,37,38] and reading habits [56,57], make up the usual tasks of children during lockdown. Families who had established routines and schedules for performing them obtained better results than those who did not. In South Korea, 81% of parents reported that their children’s sedentary screen times increased during the time of confinement [16]. In another study [22], they showed that Spanish children’s exposure to screens was 15 h a week and that their lifestyles fell within the health standards in terms of hours of rest and PA habits. The results of another investigation [58] showed that sedentary leisure (number of hours of television, computer and console) maintained a significant and inverse relationship with hours of sleep and PA.
In relation to sleep, girls sleep more hours a day (first cycle of infant education, of course) than boys and spend more time on daily activities (second cycle of infant education). Those who recorded the most hours of sleep and spent the most time on daily activities were those who performed PA (six to seven days). According to other authors [59], children slept for 9.72 h per night. The duration of sleep the previous night was positively associated with daytime PA. Other authors [60] indicated that a longer sleep duration was generally associated with better body composition, emotional self-regulation and growth in children aged 0–4 years. Guan et al. [16], in interviews with parents of preschool-aged children in Beijing (China), found that, compared to pre-COVID-19, almost all children went to bed later and woke up later.
With respect to music, although playing an instrument improves cognitive capacity [39,40], we saw that, on the days of lockdown, the children practiced nursery rhymes and listened to music and danced, turning this action into a PA. Likewise, play, sometimes related to PA [44], has taken up much of children’s time as a replacement for using technological devices [41], thus reinforcing parent–child relationships and increasing the happiness of parents and children [43].
The most significant differences that will be established in education, after this health and social crisis, will be found in the change of the cycles (last year of infant and first of primary and sixth of primary, whose students will go on to Secondary Education centres), although only when the pandemic ends will we be able to evaluate the total health, social, educational and economic impacts of this global disaster [46] in consideration of the negative changes in the lifestyles of Spanish children during lockdown. Other researchers from other countries have also tried to measure the impacts of confinement on levels of PA and sedentary behaviours. Thus, the study by Genevieve et al. [6] suggested that U.S. children performed less PA and engaged in more sedentary behaviours during the early-COVID-19 period as compared to before the pandemic. The most common physical activities during the early-COVID-19 period were free play or unstructured activities such as running and walking. Children were more likely to perform PA at home indoors or on neighbourhood streets during the periods of lockdown against before COVID-19. A sedentary lifestyle can become ingrained, leading to an increased risk of obesity, diabetes and cardiovascular disease in children. Following this idea, another study [61] evidenced the negative impacts of the COVID-19 confinement on the PA levels and sedentary behaviours of Spanish children. These findings should be taken into account to design and implement public health strategies for preserving children’s health during and after the pandemic, particularly for children with social vulnerabilities. A study carried out with 2159 Portuguese children [62] also confirmed less time devoted to PA during confinement compared to what was generally reported on normal days and highlighted the need to establish strategies to increase the levels of PA of children in families whose parents are working and have no outdoor space.
Therefore, in our sample, the hypothesis that PA performed at home would be low was confirmed, because low levels of PA were recorded. The results were similar to other studies cited above. On the other hand, the initial hypothesis that children would spend a large part of their time at home using electronic screen devices was also fulfilled, with high levels of time spent on different electronic devices.

5. Conclusions

Most of the participants in this study were children at elementary school from two-parent families who had established routines and schedules to perform tasks. The children in these families spent more time practicing PA on a daily basis compared to those without rules, who slept more and used digital screens more.
A large percentage of children performed PA during the confinement, especially elementary school children, but they recorded little PA time. The use of digital screens has also formed a prominent part of daily activities to a greater extent among primary school children. Daily activities were practiced more by the between three to six years old group and by girls. Time spent sleeping was directly proportional to the time spent in PA and indirectly proportional to the time spent using display devices. The children who slept the most were those from zero to three years old and those of other ages, especially girls, who belonged to large families.
PA is closely related to healthy behaviours and is part of many daily activities for children ages 0–12, including those related to music and play. During the confinement and the following days, the use of digital screens was the most performed activity, followed with the least amount of time in minutes dedicated to PA in the child population (0–12 years). In this sense, PA minimally counteracts a sedentary lifestyle of the use of screens. It would be useful to analyse in the future daily activities individually so that we can observe the time that children dedicate to each of the activities and, therefore, their interests.
The strengths of this study are its timeliness and punctuality, as it was carried out during the initial dates of the lockdown, providing educational perspectives that other studies do not capture by focusing only on health issues. It is also recommended for future research to create and validate a questionnaire that allows measuring different variables related to the lifestyles of children during the period of confinement in order to be able to use the same data collection instrument for all researchers who work in the future in studies on this subject.

6. Study Limitations

This study was not without its limitations. Although the questionnaire was created on the basis of various national questions and was constructed by experts in the field of PA and education, no quantitative validation was carried out. Thus, the reliability of the study was based on the percentage of concordance of the experts who judged the questionnaire. Likewise, the self-informed opinion of the families could have been another limitation; however, during the pandemic, it was the method used due to the principle of opportunism and the need to offer solutions to the situation. It should be noted that there were also limitations in the statistical analysis of the study; however, this helped to raise some prospects for the future. Firstly, there are other statistical methods that emphasise the importance of the relationships between variables and also can establish a statistical analysis of covariances or structural equation models. In addition, and although the questionnaire is accessible to the entire scientific community, the results will surely be uploaded to a data cloud. However, the importance of this study and its practical applications should be stressed, as it will provide public administration and educational centres with relevant information on children aged 0–12, with the purpose of promoting their healthy physical conditions and intervening in the problem of sedentarism and in other psychosocial aspects.

Author Contributions

Concept, J.C.-Z. and M.L.Z.-S.; methodology, G.G.-V. and V.A.-G.; software, G.G.-V.; validation, G.G.-V.; formal analysis, A.S.-R. and V.A.-G.; investigation V.A.-G., A.S.-R., M.L.Z.-S. and J.C.-Z.; resources, V.A.-G., A.S.-R., G.G.-V., M.L.Z.-S. and J.C.-Z.; data curation, G.G.-V.; writing—original draft preparation, V.A.-G., A.S.-R., G.G.-V., M.L.Z.-S. and J.C.-Z.; writing—review and editing, V.A.-G., A.S.-R., G.G.-V., M.L.Z.-S. and J.C.-Z.; visualisation, V.A.-G., A.S.-R., G.G.-V., M.L.Z.-S. and J.C.-Z.; supervision, V.A.-G.; project administration, J.C.-Z. and V.A.-G. and funding acquisition, V.A.-G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was carried out in accordance with the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Ethics Committee of EDUCA (national platform for educational excellence) with code 22020 and approval date 03/15/2020.

Informed Consent Statement

All participants accepted informed consent.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Jurado, J.M.; Llorente, F.J.; Gil, M. Evaluación de la actividad física en niños. Acta Pediátrica Española 2019, 77, 96–101. [Google Scholar]
  2. Kunzle-Elizeche, H.G.; González-Fernández, D.D.P.; Radice-Oviedo, C.A. Actividad física en niños y adolescentes para prevención de enfermedades crónicas no transmisibles. Pediatría (Asunción) 2018, 45, 83–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Park, S.H.; Park, C.G.; Bahorski, J.S.; Cormier, E. Factors influencing obesity among preschoolers: Multilevel approach. Int. Nurs. Rev. 2019, 66, 346–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Saldanha-Gomes, C.; Heude, B.; Charles, M.A.; de Lauzon-Guillain, B.; Botton, J.; Carles, S.; Forhan, A.; Dargent-Molina, P.; Lioret, S. Prospective associations between energy balance-related behaviors at 2 years of age and subsequent adiposity: The EDEN mother–child cohort. Int. J. Obes. 2017, 41, 38–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Hinkley, T.; Brown, H.; Carson, V.; Teychenne, M. Cross sectional associations of screen time and outdoor play with social skills in preschool children. PLoS ONE 2018, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Genevieve, F.D.; Bridgette, D.; Shirlene, D. Early effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on physical activity and sedentary behavior in children living in the U. S. BMC Public Health 2020, 201351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Rolla, G. Staying home may not be alone: Outdoor Activities at the time of the Coronavirus. Covid Perspect Res. Rev. 2020, 1, 1. Available online: https://researchinfotext.com/ropen/attachments/articles/pdfs/657310COVID20-5004.pdf (accessed on 15 January 2021).
  8. Dalton, L.; Rapa, E.; Stein, A. Protecting the psychological health of children through effective communication about COVID-19. Lancet Child Adolesc. Health 2020, 4, 346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Brooks, S.K.; Webster, R.K.; Smith, L.E.; Woodland, L.; Wessely, S.; Greenberg, N.; Rubin, G.J. The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: Rapid review of the evidence. Lancet 2020, 395, 912–920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Save the Children. Informe de Save the Children: La Pobreza Infantil Podrá llegar al 33% en 2020 Debido a la Crisis Económica por la COVID-19. 2020. Available online: https://bit.ly/3gxCQfW or https://www.savethechildren.es (accessed on 26 July 2020).
  11. Zueck, M.D.C.; Ramírez García, A.A.; Rodríguez Villalobos, J.M.; Irigoyen Gutiérrez, H.E. Satisfacción en las clases de Educación Física y la intencionalidad de ser activo en niños del nivel de primaria. Retos. 2020, 37, 33–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Founaud, M.P.; González-Audicana, C. La vivencia emocional en los estudiantes de Educación Primaria en EF. J. Sport Health Res. 2020, 12 (Suppl. 1), 15–24. [Google Scholar]
  13. Castañeda-Vázquez, C.; Espejo-Garcés, T.; Zurita-Ortega, F.; Fernández-Revelles, A.B. Physical education’s teacher training program through gaming, ict and continuous assessment. SportTK 2019, 8, 55–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. WHO. Estrategia Mundial Sobre Régimen Alimentario, AF y Salud. Recomendaciones Mundiales Sobre AF Para la Salud; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  15. WHO. Global Recommendations on Physical Activity for Health; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2010; Available online: https://www.who.int/dietphysicalactivity/publications/9789241599979/es/ (accessed on 26 July 2020).
  16. WHO. Guidelines on PA, Sedentary Behaviour and Sleep for Children under 5 Years of Age; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2019; Available online: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/311664 (accessed on 26 July 2020).
  17. Guan, H.; Okely, A.D.; Aguilar-Farias, N.; Del Pozo Cruz, B.; Draper, C.E.; El Hamdouchi, A.; Florindo, A.A.; Jáuregui, A.; Katzmarzyk, P.T.; Kontsevaya, A.; et al. Promoting Healthy Movement Behaviours Among Children during The COVID-19 Pandemic. Lancet Child Adolesc. Health 2020, 4, 416–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Gómez-Gerdel, M.A. El cerebro pleno del niño/a: La labor de un/a maestro/a de educación inclusiva con las familias en tiempos de confinamiento. Una reflexión educativa. Rev. Int. Educ. Justicia Soc. 2020, 9, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  19. Moore, S.A.; Faulkner, G.; Rhodes, R.E.; Brussoni, M.; Chulak-Bozzer, T.; Ferguson, L.J.; Tremblay, M.S. Impact of the COVID-19 virus outbreak on movement and play behaviours of Canadian children and youth: A national survey. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Activ. 2020, 17, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. WHO. La OMS Publica las Primeras Directrices Sobre Intervenciones de Salud Digital. WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2019. Available online: https://www.who.int/es/news-room/detail/17-04-2019-who-releases-first-guideline-on-digital-health-interventions (accessed on 26 July 2020).
  21. Guthold, R.; Stevens, G.A.; Riley, L.M.; Bull, F.C. Worldwide trends in insufficient PA from 2001 to 2016: A pooled analysis of 358 population-based surveys with 1•9 million participants. Lancet Glob. Health 2018, 6, e1077–e1086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Boente, B.; Leirós, R.; García-Soidán, J.L. ¿Los menores españoles, en su tiempo libre, prefieren dispositivos electrónicos o actividad física? Sportis 2020, 6, 347–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. National Institute of Statistics. Encuesta Sobre Equipamiento y Uso de Tecnologías de Información y Comunicación en los Hogares; INE: Madrid, Spain, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  24. Tejeiro, R. La adicción a los videojuegos. Una revisión. Adicciones Rev. Socidrogalcohol. 2001, 13, 407–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Justicia, F.; Villadangos, S.M. Menores y nuevas tecnologías: Conductas indicadoras de posible problema de adicción. Psicothema 2010, 22, 180–188. [Google Scholar]
  26. Chamarro, A.; Carbonell, X.; Manresa, J.M.; Muñoz-Miralles, R.; Ortega-González, R.; López-Morrón, M.R.; Batalla, C.; Torán, P. El cuestionario de experiencias relacionadas con los videojuegos (CERV): Un instrumento para detectar el uso problemático de videojuegos en adolescentes españoles. Adicciones Rev. Socidrogalcohol. 2014, 26, 303–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Lloret, D.; Morell, R. Impulsiveness and video game addiction. Health Addict. 2016, 16, 33–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lloret, D.; Morell, R.; Marzo, J.C.; Tirado, S. Validación española de la escala de adicción a videojuegos para adolescentes (GASA). Atención Primaria 2018, 50, 350–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Hernández-Pérez, F. Los riesgos de las tecnologías de la información y la comunicación. CONAMED 2019, 24, 184–189. [Google Scholar]
  30. Lozano, A.; Zurita, F.; Ubago, J.L.; Puertas, P.; Ramírez, I.; Núñez, J.I. Videojuegos, práctica de AF, obesidad y hábitos sedentarios en escolares de entre 10 y 12 años de la provincia de Granada. Retos 2019, 35, 42–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Cuesta-Cambra, U.; Cuesta-Díaz, V.; Martínez, L.; Niño, J.I. Smartphone: En comunicación, algo más que una adicción. Rev. Latina Comu. Soc. 2020, 75, 367–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. González-Valero, G.; Ubago, J.L.; Ramírez, I.R.; Puertas, P. Relationship between the use of video games and physical-healthy, psychosocial and academic indicators in primary schoolchildren. J. Hum. Sport Exerc. 2020, 15, 336–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Nakamura, R.; Yamashita, J.; Akabayashi, H.; Tamura, T.; Zhou, Y. A comparative analysis of children’s time use and educational achievement: Assessing evidence from China, Japan and the United States. Chin. J. Sociol. 2020, 6, 257–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ministerio de Educación y Formación Profesional. Evaluaciones de la OCDE. 2019. Available online: https://www.educacionyfp.gob.es/inee/publicaciones/informes.html (accessed on 26 July 2020).
  35. García-Osuna, S. Actitudes de género sobre las responsabilidades del cuidado de los hijos y tareas domésticas de hombres y mujeres en parejas de doble ingreso con hijos menores en Nuevo León. Perspect. Soc. 2017, 19, 89–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Paterna, C.; Martínez-Martínez, M.C. Influencia de las variables de género en la distribución de las tareas domésticas y de cuidado. Interam. J. Psychol. 2009, 43, 241–249. [Google Scholar]
  37. Scarafoni, M.E. División sexual del trabajo doméstico y el uso del tiempo en las tareas de cuidado. Derecho Cienc. Soc. 2016, 14, 127–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Fiz-Poveda, M.R.; Olea-Aisa, M.J.; Goicoechea-Tabar, M.J.; Ibiricu-Díaz, O. Los hábitos de lectura y su relación con otras variables. Huarte de San Juan Filol. y Didáctica de la Leng. 2000, 5, 7–31. [Google Scholar]
  39. Capistrán, R.W. Educación musical y bienestar psicológico en los niños y adolescentes en etapa temprana de la “Ciudad de los niños de Aguascalientes”. Artseduca 2020, 25, 123–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Guhn, M.; Emerson, S.D.; Gouzouasis, P. A population-level analysis of associations between school music participation and academic achievement. J. Educ. Psychol. 2020, 112, 308–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Fumero, A.; Marrero, R.J.; Bethencourt, J.M.; Peñate, W. Risk factors of internet gaming disorder symptoms in Spanish adolescents. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2020, 111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Cachón, J.; Cabrera, A.; Lara, A.; Zagalaz, M.L. Motricidad Infantil y Juego. In Educación Física. Pasado, presente y futuro, 1st ed.; Zurita Ortega, F., Ubago Jiménez, J.L., Puertas Molero, P., González Valero, G., Ramírez Garnizo, I., Eds.; ADDIJES: Granada, Spain, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  43. Piya-Amornphan, N.; Santiworakul, A.; Cetthakrikul, S.; Srirug, P. PA and creativity of children and youths. BMC Pediatr. 2020, 20, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Greve, W.; Thomsen, T.; Dehio, C. Does playing pay? The fitness-effect of free play during childhood. Evol. Psychol. 2014, 12, 434–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Uka, A.; Uka, A. The effect of students’ experience with the transition from primary to secondary school on self-regulated learning and motivation. Sustainability 2020, 12, 8519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Di Gennaro, F.; Pizzol, D.; Marotta, C.; Antunes, M.; Racalbuto, V.; Veronese, N.; Smith, L. Coronavirus Diseases (COVID-19) Current Status and Future Perspectives: A Narrative Review. Inter. J. Enviro. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 2690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Real decreto 463/2020, de 14 de marzo, por el que se declara el estado de alarma para la gestión de la situación de crisis sanitaria ocasionada por el COVID-19. Boletín Oficial del Estado: Gobierno de España, 2020. Available online: https://www.boe.es/boe/dias/2020/03/14/pdfs/BOE-A-2020-3692.pdf (accessed on 15 January 2021).
  48. World Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjets. Jahrbuch Für Wissenschaft Und Ethik 2009, 14, 233–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Paz-Maldonado, E. La ética en la investigación educativa. Rev. Cien. Pedagógicas Innov. 2018, 6, 45–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Cruz-Correa, M.; Díaz-Toro, C.E.; Falcón, J.L.; García-Rivera, E.J.; Guiot, S.M.; Maldonado-Dávila, W.T.; Martínez, K.G.; Méndez-Latalladi, W.; Pérez, C.M.; Quiñones-Feliciano, M.L.; et al. Alianza Académica de Salud Pública para la respuesta a COVID-19: El papel de una Fuerza de Tarea Médica Nacional en Puerto Rico. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 4839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. De Craemer, M.; McGregor, D.; Androutsos, O.; Manios, Y.; Cardon, G. Compliance with 24-h movement behaviour guidelines among Belgian pre-school children: The ToyBox-study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 2171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Ji, M.; Tang, A.; Zhang, Y.; Zou, J.; Zhou, G.; Deng, J.; Yang, L.; Li, M.; Chen, J.; Qin, H.; et al. The Relationship between Obesity, Sleep and Physical Activity in Chinese Preschool Children. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Arufe, V.; Cachón, J.; Zagalaz, M.L.; Sanmiguel-Rodríguez, A.; González-Valero, G. Equipment and use of Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) in Spanish homes during the period of confinement. Association with the social habits, lifestyle and physical activity of children under 12 years old. Rev. Latina Comun. Soc. 2020, 78, 183–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Navarrete-Mendieta, G.; Guamán-Coronel, M.A.; Arteaga-Marín, M.I.; Guamán-Coronel, D.C. Aulas virtuales como mediación pedagógica para la inclusión y discapacidades. Publicaciones 2020, 50, 31–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Lee, D.; Han, C.; Lee, H.; Shin, D. Effects of a smart phone-based game on balance ability and dizziness in healthy adult individuals. J. Hum. Sport Exerc. 2019, 14, 793–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Perone, S.; Anderson, A.J.; Youatt, E.A. Don’t forget your lunch: Age and individual differences in how children perform everyday tasks. Cogn. Dev. 2020, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Yubero, S.; Larrañaga, E. El valor de la lectura en relación con el comportamiento lector. Un estudio sobre hábitos lectores y estilo de vida en niños. OCNOS 2010, 6, 7–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Amigo, I.; Busto, R.; Herrero, F.J.; Fernández, C. Actividad física, ocio sedentario, falta de sueño y sobrepeso infantil. Psicothema 2008, 20, 516–520. [Google Scholar]
  59. Huang, W.Y.; Lai, K.H.; Xing, R.; Wong, S.H. Temporal Associations of Nocturnal Sleep Duration with Physical Activity and Sedentary Time in Preschool Children: 888: Board# 122 May 29 2: 00 PM–3: 30 PM. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2019, 51, 223–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Chaput, J.P.; Gray, C.E.; Poitras, V.J.; Carson, V.; Gruber, R.; Birken, C.S.; MacLean, J.E.; Aubert, S.; Sampson, M.; Tremblay, M.S. Systematic review of the relationships between sleep duration and health indicators in the early years (0–4 years). BMC Public Health 2017, 17, 855, 92–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Medrano, M.; Cadenas-Sanchez, C.; Oses, M.; Arenaza, L.; Amasene, M.; Labayen, I. Changes in lifestyle behaviours during theCOVID-19 confinement in Spanish children: A longitudinal analysis from theMUGIproject. Pediatr. Obes 2020, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Pombo, A.; Luz, C.; Rodrigues, L.P.; Ferreira, C.; Cordovil, R. Correlates of children’s PA during the COVID-19 confinement in Portugal. BMC Public Health 2020, 189, 14–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table
Table 1. Distribution of the sample according to the region in Spain.
Table 1. Distribution of the sample according to the region in Spain.
Region (Comunidad Autónoma)Frequency (n)Percentage (%)
Andalucía24929.7
Galicia24429.2
Valencia678.0
Madrid506.0
Castilla and León364.3
Baleares283.3
País Vasco273.2
Canarias263.1
Aragón222.6
Murcia182.2
Cataluña161.9
La Rioja151.8
Asturias121.4
Cantabria81.0
Extremadura70.8
Castilla and La Mancha60.7
Navarra60.7
Total837100.0
Table
Table 2. Characteristics of the sample.
Table 2. Characteristics of the sample.
CharacteristicsCategoryFrequency (n)Percentage (%)
SexBoy42050.2%
Girl41749.8%
AgeFirst cycle of Infant School (0–2 year)20224.1%
Second cycle of Infant School (3–5 year)26031.1%
Primary Education (6–12 year)37544.8%
Family typeBiparental73687.9%
Single parent344.1%
Numerous family91.1%
Biparental with separation586.9%
Routines and task schedulesYes71785.7%
No12014.3%
PA during lockdownNo29134.8%
2 to 3 days/week27332.6%
4 to 5 days/week16419.6%
6 to 7 days/week10913.0%
Media (M)SD
Healthy behaviourDaily Physical Activity36.4735.46
Daily use digital screens161.18124.80
Hours of sleep per day9.931.51
Daily activitiesDaily activities413.81185.31
Table
Table 3. Sex and the establishment of routine in reference to children’s healthy and daily behaviours.
Table 3. Sex and the establishment of routine in reference to children’s healthy and daily behaviours.
Levene TestT-Test
CharacteristicsCategoryMSDFSigtSig
By sexDaily Physical ActivityBoy38.0040.6957.5830.0061.2550.210
Girl34.9329.242
Daily use digital screensBoy163.29125.270.1650.7992.4910.013
Girl152.05124.45
Hours of sleep per dayBoy9.821.480.0220.882−2.1350.033
Girl10.041.53
Daily activitiesBoy399.51184.490.1010.750−2.2460.025
Girl428.22185.24
Routines and task schedulesDaily Physical ActivityYes38.1335.010.1400.7083.3230.001
No26.5836.68
Daily use of digital screensYes160.37123.061.5180.218−0.4570.038
No186.00135.20
Hours of sleep per dayYes9.861.484.0890.043−3.0750.005
No10.321.64
Daily activitiesYes412.86177.298.9980.003−0.3610.363
No419.47228.26
Note: Mean (M) and standard deviation (SD).
Table
Table 4. Age and type of family according to children’s healthy and everyday behaviours.
Table 4. Age and type of family according to children’s healthy and everyday behaviours.
CharacteristicsCategoryMSDFp-Value
AgeDaily Physical ActivityFirst cycle of Infant School (0–2 year)30.8642.593.5340.030
Second cycle of infant school (3–5 year)37.2636.01
Primary Education (6–12 year)38.9530.25
Daily use digital screensFirst cycle of Infant School (0–2 year)85.5499.5588.0000.000
Second cycle of infant school (3–5 year)144.0790.75
Primary Education (6–12 year)213.78133.12
Hours of sleep per dayFirst cycle of Infant School (0–2 year)10.981.8294.0670.000
Second cycle of infant school (3–5 year)9.951.28
Primary Education (6–12 year)9.341.11
Daily activitiesFirst cycle of Infant School (0–2 year)381.36225.496.1640.002
Second cycle of infant school (3–5 year)441.83160.48
Primary Education (6–12 year)411.87174.59
Family typeDaily Physical ActivityBiparental36.9436.5820.5090.677
Single parent34.9128.245
Numerous family33.3331.623
Biparental with separation29.7619.526
Daily use digital screensBiparental159.16126.422.8380.043
Single parent192.65105.05
Numerous family140.00113.99
Biparental with separation173.79123.42
Hours of sleep per dayBiparental9.971.543.1420.025
Single parent9.440.90
Numerous family10.661.32
Biparental with separation9.701.62
Daily activitiesBiparental407.09183.733.8270.010
Single parent438.86188.61
Numerous family438.1186.08
Biparental with separation510.13207.49
Table
Table 5. Physical activity during lockdown according to children’s healthy, everyday behaviours.
Table 5. Physical activity during lockdown according to children’s healthy, everyday behaviours.
CharacteristicsCategoryMSDFX2
PA during lockdownDaily Physical ActivityNo12.4017.69150.1160.000
2 to 3 days/week37.6319.83
4 to 5 days/week51.5926.36
6 to 7 days/week75.0958.65
Daily use digital screensNo173.09115.564.6280.018
2 to 3 days/week165.68147.85
4 to 5 days/week157.09108.36
6 to 7 days/week141.50106.97
Hours of sleep per dayNo10.161.737.6100.000
2 to 3 days/week9.801.36
4 to 5 days/week9.561.14
6 to 7 days/week10.191.57
Daily activitiesNo390.77215.346.3760.000
2 to 3 days/week422.69166.60
4 to 5 days/week398.24147.53
6 to 7 days/week476.52180.50
Table
Table 6. The correlation of healthy, everyday behaviours and ages of the children.
Table 6. The correlation of healthy, everyday behaviours and ages of the children.
AgeDPAUDDSHSPDDA
Age10.168 *0.595 **−0.547 **0.146
DPA 1−0.118−0.1310.301 **
UDDS 1−0.395 **0.234 **
HSPD 1−0.111
DA 1
Note 1: Daily Physical Activity (DPA), Daily use of digital screens (UDDS), Hours of Sleep Per Day (HSPD) and Daily Activities (DA). Note 2: Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (**), and correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (*).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cachón-Zagalaz, J.; Zagalaz-Sánchez, M.L.; Arufe-Giráldez, V.; Sanmiguel-Rodríguez, A.; González-Valero, G. Physical Activity and Daily Routine among Children Aged 0–12 during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Spain. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 703. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18020703

AMA Style

Cachón-Zagalaz J, Zagalaz-Sánchez ML, Arufe-Giráldez V, Sanmiguel-Rodríguez A, González-Valero G. Physical Activity and Daily Routine among Children Aged 0–12 during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Spain. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021; 18(2):703. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18020703

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cachón-Zagalaz, Javier, M.ª Luisa Zagalaz-Sánchez, Víctor Arufe-Giráldez, Alberto Sanmiguel-Rodríguez, and Gabriel González-Valero. 2021. "Physical Activity and Daily Routine among Children Aged 0–12 during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Spain" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18, no. 2: 703. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18020703

APA Style

Cachón-Zagalaz, J., Zagalaz-Sánchez, M. L., Arufe-Giráldez, V., Sanmiguel-Rodríguez, A., & González-Valero, G. (2021). Physical Activity and Daily Routine among Children Aged 0–12 during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Spain. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(2), 703. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18020703

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop